Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T06:14:05.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Complications in Predicting Intergroup Behavior from Implicit Biases: One Size Does Not Fit All

from Section IV - Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2024

By
Galen V. Bodenhausen  and
Christopher D. Petsko
Edited by
Jon A. Krosnick ,
Tobias H. Stark  and
Amanda L. Scott
Jon A. Krosnick
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Tobias H. Stark
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Amanda L. Scott
Affiliation:
The Strategy Team, Columbus, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Scholars have long recognized that successful prediction of behavior on the basis of explicit attitudes depends on the correspondence between the attitude measure and the focal behavior. Fishbein and Ajzen (2010) argued that behaviors vary in terms of their action, target, context, and time, and that the prediction of specific behaviors is greatly enhanced when explicit attitude measures reflect these features of the to-be-predicted behavior. We argue that the same principle applies in the case of predicting behavior from implicit attitudes, and we review relevant evidence relating to each of Fishbein and Ajzen’s parameters. Special attention is paid to the target parameter, given increasing awareness of the intersectional nature of bias. A global race bias may not extend equally to all members of a particular racial identity, and cross-cutting factors such as gender, age, or sexuality may qualify the extent to which global measures of race bias predict discriminatory behavior toward particular individuals.

Keywords

implicit biasdiscriminationattitude–behavior relationintersectionalitysituated social cognition
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism , pp. 541 - 558
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorization. In Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 179–193.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amodio, D. M., & Devine, P. G. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 652–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, A. H., LaFrance, M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2019). Is man the measure of all things? A social cognitive account of androcentrism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 307–331.Google Scholar
Barden, J., Maddux, W. W., Petty, R. E., et al. (2004). Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biernat, M., & Vescio, T. K. (1993). Categorization and stereotyping: Effects of group context on memory and social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 166–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Chapleau, K. M. (2004). The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science, 15, 674–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., Sadler, M. S., et al. (2002). The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: Judging by features and categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In Wyer, R. S. Jr. (Ed.), Stereotype Activation and Inhibition: Advances in Social Cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 243–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Garst, J. (1998). Stereotypes in thought and deed: Social-cognitive origins of intergroup discrimination. In Sedikides, C., Schopler, J., & Insko, C. A. (Eds.), Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 311–335.Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Peery, D. (2009). Social categorization and stereotyping in vivo: The VUCA challenge. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Uleman, J. S. & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), Unintended Thought. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 212–252.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooley, E., & Payne, B. K. (2017). Using groups to measure intergroup prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 46–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., et al. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Park, B., et al. (2011). Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Kurzban, R. (2003). Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, W. T. L., & Devine, P. G. (2015). Stereotypes possess heterogeneous directionality: A theoretical and empirical exploration of stereotype structure and content. PLoS ONE, 10, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, M. A., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2018). Category (non)fit modulates extrapolative stereotyping of multiply categorizable targets. Social Cognition, 36, 559–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, K. W. (1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. In Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.), Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York, NY: New Press, pp. 357–383.Google Scholar
Deaux, K. (2018). Ethnic/racial identity: Fuzzy categories and shifting positions. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 677, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehon, H., & Brédart, S. (2001). An ‘other-race’ effect in age estimation from faces. Perception, 30, 1107–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devaraj, S., Quigley, N. R., & Patel, P. C. (2018). The effects of skin tone, height, and gender on earnings. PLoS ONE, 13, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., et al. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., et al. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhardt, J. L., Davies, P. G., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., et al. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17, 383–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., et al. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, A. J., Eder, A. B., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2013). Approach–avoidance motivation and emotion: Convergence and divergence. Emotion Review, 5, 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Chen, J. M., McDonel, E. C., et al. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude—behavior processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 155–171.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. B., Penner, A. M., Saperstein, A., et al. (2011). Looking the part: Social status cues shape race perception. PLoS ONE, 6, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative–propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, DB. A. L., et al. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 526–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goff, P. A., Thomas, M. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, 59, 392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008). Convergent and predictive validity of implicit and explicit anxiety measures as a function of specificity similarity and content similarity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. C. (1991). Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood: People = male, male = people. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M. S., & Thomas, K. M. (2009). The hidden prejudice in selection: A research investigation on skin color bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 134–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinzman, L., & Maddox, K. B. (2017). Conceptual and visual representations of racial categories: Distinguishing subtypes from subgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2003). Facing prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14, 640–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization. Psychological Science, 15, 342–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, K. B., & Davies, P. G. (2010). Differentially dangerous? Phenotypic racial stereotpicality increases implicit bias among ingroup and outgroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, K. B., & Davies, P. G. (2017). What influences shooter bias? The effects of suspect race, neighborhood, and clothing on decisions to shoot. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, S. K., & Chasteen, A. L. (2009). Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 1281–1285.Google Scholar
Kang, S. K., Chasteen, A. L., Cadieux, J., et al. (2014). Comparing young and older adults’ perceptions of conflicting stereotypes and multiply-categorizable targets. Psychology and Aging, 29, 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., et al. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, A. M. (2018). Comparing prescriptive and descriptive gender stereotypes about children, adults, and the elderly. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Adams, B. D., et al. (2002). The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurdi, B., Seitchik, A., Axt, J., et al. (2019). Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387–15392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 801–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, G. J. W., Neel, R., Lassetter, B., et al. (2018). Racial bias in implicit danger associations generalizes to older male targets. PLoS ONE, 13, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, D. S., & Correll, J. (2011). Target prototypicality moderates racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago Face Database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2018). The effects of category and physical features on stereotyping and evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, K. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 383–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddox, K. B., & Perry, J. M. (2018). Racial appearance bias: Improving evidence-based policies to address racial disparities. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. E., North, M. S., & Phillips, K. W. (2019). Intersectional escape: Older women elude agentic prescriptions more than older men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 342–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, M. M., Sidanius, J., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Developing a theory of gendered prejudice: An evolutionary and social dominance perspective. In Kramer, R. M., Leonardelli, G. J., & Livingston, R. W. (Eds.), Social Cognition, Social Identity, and Intergroup Relations. New York, NY: Psychology Press, pp. 189–220.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1981). The spontaneous self-concept as affected by personal distinctiveness. In Lynch, M., Norem-Hebeison, A. A., & Gergen, K. (Eds.), Self-Concept: Advances in Theory and Research. New York, NY: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. J., & Miller, D. T. (1995). The distinctiveness effect in social categorization: You are what makes you unusual. Psychological Science, 6, 246–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolas, G., de la Fuente, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Mind the overlap in multiple categorization: A review of crossed categorization, intersectionality, and multiracial perception. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 621–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In Bargh, J. A. (Ed.), Social Psychology and the Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press, pp. 265–292.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell (Eds.), M. S., Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 117–141.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, K. E. (1982). Measures of explained variance: Cautions and limitations. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 766–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 562–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, K., & Lundberg, K. (2014). The affect misattribution procedure: Ten years of evidence on reliability, validity, and mechanisms. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 672–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedulla, D. S. (2014). The positive consequences of negative stereotypes: Race, sexual orientation, and the job application process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, A. M., & Saperstein, A. (2008). How social status shapes race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 19628–19630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perszyk, D. R., Lei, R. F., Bodenhausen, G. V., et al. (2019). Bias at the intersection of race and gender: Evidence from preschool-aged children. Developmental Science, 22, e12788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Zogmaister, C. (2010). Prediction of behavior. In Gawronski, B. & Payne, B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 255–278.Google Scholar
Petsko, C. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2019a). Race-crime congruency effects revisited: Do we take defendants’ sexual orientation into account? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petsko, C. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2019b). Racial stereotyping of gay men: Can a minority sexual orientation erase race? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petsko, C. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2020). Multifarious person perception: How social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 14, e12518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., et al. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high-and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, E. A., Goplen, J., & Kunstman, J. W. (2011). Selective responses to threat: The roles of race and gender in decisions to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1274–1281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, J. R., & Olson, K. R. (2018). Test–retest reliability and predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in children. Developmental Psychology, 54, 308–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rattan, A., Steele, J., & Ambady, N. (2019). Identical applicant but different outcomes: The impact of gender versus race salience in hiring. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remedios, J. D., Chasteen, A. L., Rule, N. O., et al. (2011). Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1312–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Prestwich, A., et al. (2007). The IAT as a predictor of food choice: The case of fruits versus snacks. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, A. M., Sherman, J. W., Rees, H. R., et al. (2020). On the roles of stereotype activation and application in diminishing implicit bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 46, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sesko, A. K., & Biernat, M. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.) (2014). Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J. T., Navarro, M. A., Tan, C. N., et al. (2014). Attitude–behavior consistency, the principle of compatibility, and organ donation: A classic innovation. Health Psychology, 33, 1084–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 56, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepanova, E. V., Strube, M. J., Clote, L. E., et al. (2016). Pictorial race activation in priming measures. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. R., & Simpson, A. J. (2017). Perspective taking and member‐to‐group generalization of implicit racial attitudes: The role of target prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. R., Thiem, K. C., & Neel, R. (2016). Does seeing faces of young Black boys facilitate the identification of threatening stimuli? Psychological Science, 27, 384–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veenstra, G. (2013). The gendered nature of discriminatory experiences by race, class, and sexuality: A comparison of intersectionality theory and the subordinate male target hypothesis. Sex Roles, 68, 646–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, R. H., & Newman, L. S. (1976). Increasing attitude-behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of the behavioral measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 793–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, R. H., Vernon, D. T., & Tognacci, L. N. (1974). Specificity of the attitude as a determinant of attitude-behavior congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 724–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. P., Remedios, J. D., & Rule, N. O. (2017). Interactive effects of obvious and ambiguous social categories on perceptions of leadership: When double-minority status may be beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 888–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolsiefer, K., Westfall, J., & Judd, C. M. (2017). Modeling stimulus variation in three common implicit attitude tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1193–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×