Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:26:48.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Changing Implicit Bias versus Empowering People to Address the Personal Dilemma of Unintentional Bias

from Section V - How to Change Implicit Bias?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2024

Jon A. Krosnick
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Tobias H. Stark
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Amanda L. Scott
Affiliation:
The Strategy Team, Columbus, Ohio
Get access

Summary

A primary goal of prejudice and stereotyping research is to reduce intergroup disparities arising from various forms of bias. For the last thirty years, much, perhaps most, of this research has focused on implicit bias as the crucial construct of interest. There has been, however, considerable confusion and debate about what this construct is, how to measure it, whether it predicts behavior, how much it contributes to intergroup disparities, and what would signify successful intervention against it. We argue that this confusion arises in part because much work in this area has focused narrowly on the automatic processes of implicit bias without sufficient attention to other relevant psychological constructs and processes, such as people’s values, goals, knowledge, and self-regulation (Devine, 1989). We believe that basic research on implicit bias itself is important and can contribute to reducing intergroup disparities, but those potential contributions diminish if and when the research disregards controlled processes and the personal dilemma faced by sincerely nonprejudiced people who express bias unintentionally. We advocate a renewed focus on this personal dilemma as an important avenue for progress.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amodio, D. M., Devine, P. G., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2007). A dynamic model of guilt: Implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychological Science, 18(6), 524530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01933.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Manwell, L. B., et al. (2015). Effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine, 90(2), 221230. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, W. T. L., Abramson, L. Y., Devine, P. G., et al. (2012). Stereotypes, prejudice, and depression: The integrated perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 427449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, W. T. L. (2022). Developing scientifically validated bias and diversity trainings that work: Empowering agents of change to reduce bias, create inclusion, and promote equity. Management Decision (online). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2021-0839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W. T. L., & Devine, P. G. (2019). The prejudice habit-breaking intervention: An empowerment-based confrontation approach. In Mallett, R. K. & Monteith, M. J. (Eds.), Confronting Prejudice and Discrimination: The Science of Changing Minds and Behaviors. London: Academic Press, pp. 249274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W. T. L., Dix, E., Scott, K., et al. (2022). Empowering people to break the bias habit: A randomized-controlled field test of the updated bias habit-breaking training. Available at: www.biashabit.com/research [last accessed March 6, 2023].Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 800814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G., & Ash, T. L. (2022). Diversity training goals, limitations, and promise: A review of the multidisciplinary literature. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, P. G., Ash, T. L., & Scott, K. E. (in press). Prejudice reduction. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, E. Finkel, & W. Mendes (Eds.). The Handbook of Social Psychology (6th ed.).Google Scholar
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., et al. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 12671278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Cox, W. T. L., et al. (2017). A gender bias habit-breaking intervention led to increased hiring of female faculty in STEM departments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 211215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., et al. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 817830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, E. L., Harris, B. M., & Devine, P. G. (under review). White people’s receptivity to Black people’s confrontations of bias: Concern about discrimination.Google Scholar
Forscher, P. S., & Devine, P. G. (2014). Breaking the prejudice habit: Automaticity and control in the context of a long-term goal. In Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Troppe, Y. (Eds.) Dual Process Theories of the Social Mind. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 468482.Google Scholar
Forscher, P. S., & Devine, P. G. (2015). Controlling implicit bias: Insights from a public health perspective. In Scott, R. A., & Kosslyn, S. M., (Eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Forscher, P. S. Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., et al. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 552559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forscher, P. S., Mitamura, C., Dix, E. L., et al. (2017). Breaking the prejudice habit: Mechanisms, timecourse, and longevity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 133146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015) Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 553561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., et al. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 1741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., et al. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., et al. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 17651785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, M. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 469485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, M. J., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., et al. (2002). Putting the brakes on prejudice: On the development and operation of cues for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 10291050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 421433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., et al. (2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 562571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (2009). The active control of prejudice: Unpacking the intentions guiding control efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 640652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rokeach, M. (1973). A Theory of Cognitive and Behavioral Change. The Nature of Human Values. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Singal, J. (2017a). The Creators of the Implicit Association Test Should Get Their Story Straight. Retrieved from: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/12/iat-behavior-problem.htmlGoogle Scholar
Singal, J. (2017b). Psychology’s Favorite Tool for Measuring Racism Isn’t Up to the Job. Retrieved from: www.thecut.com/2017/01/psychologys-racism-measuring-tool-isnt-up-to-the-job.htmlGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×