Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:54:54.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

59 - Human dignity and commodification in bioethics

from Part VII - Biology and bioethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Alastair V. Campbell
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Marcus Düwell
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jens Braarvig
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Roger Brownsword
Affiliation:
King's College London
Dietmar Mieth
Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Get access

Summary

The meaning of human dignity

This chapter is concerned with how the concept of human dignity relates to the current debates in biomedical ethics about the commodification of the human body and its parts. Before considering the specific topics dealt with in this discussion, I shall clarify how I am using the term ‘human dignity’. In accordance with the approach of this volume as a whole, my use depends on the way in which the concept functions in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) of 1948. It appears in the very first sentence of the Preamble to the Declaration:

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world…

As this wording makes clear, dignity is closely aligned to human rights, but also to the human family – not merely to the rights of individual members. This emphasis on human solidarity will be very important for my exposition of the issues in the current move towards the commodification of human bodily materials through what has been called the ‘tissue economy’ (Waldby and Mitchell 2006). In the decades since the UDHR was adopted, biomedical ethics developed dramatically in the United States and other Western nations; however, the debate rapidly seemed to place the sole focus on a notion of autonomy, narrowly understood as the individual's capacity of free choice. Such a narrow focus cannot be justified if we look at the detailed requirements of the UDHR, based on the core concepts of inherent dignity and equal and inalienable rights. Just a few of the specific requirements of the UDHR illustrate this:

  • Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

  • Article 25: Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

  • Article 29: Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity
Interdisciplinary Perspectives
, pp. 535 - 540
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, L. B., and Nelkin, D. 2001. Body Bazaar: The Market for Human Tissue in the Biotechnology Age. New York: Crown PublishersGoogle Scholar
Dickenson, D. 2007. Property in the Body: Feminist Perspectives. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. B., and Sade, R. M. 2002. ‘Paying for Kidneys: The Case Against Prohibition’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12: 17–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Titmuss, R. M. 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: George Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
Waldby, C., and Mitchell, R. 2006. Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, R. F., and Olick, R. S. 2004. The Stored Tissue Issue: Biomedical Research, Ethics, and Law in the Era of Genomic Medicine. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S. 2003. Bodies for Sale: Ethics and Exploitation in the Human Body Trade. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. 2008. ‘Blood Safety and Donation’, (accessed October 2010)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×