Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:49:29.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Markedness, Naturalness and Complexity

from Part III - Principles and Constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Ian Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackema, P. 2002. ‘A morphological approach to the absence of expletive PRO’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 291319.Google Scholar
Battistella, E. 1996. The logic of markedness. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berwick, R. 1985. The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T. and Roberts, I. 2009. ‘The return of the subset principle’, in Paola, C. and Longobardi, G. (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics and linguistic theory. Oxford University Press, pp. 5874.Google Scholar
Borer, H. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L.L.-S. 1991. ‘On the typology of wh-questions’, unpublished PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Cheng, L.L.-S. 2003a. ‘Wh-in-situ’, Glot International 7(4): 103–9.Google Scholar
Cheng, L.L.-S. 2003b. ‘Wh-in-situ: Part II’, Glot International 7(5): 129–37.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. 1969. Acquisition of syntax in children 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. ‘Minimalist inquiries: the framework’, in Martin, R., Michaels, D. and Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89156.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2001. ‘Derivation by phase’, in Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 152.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2004. ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’, in Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and beyond. Oxford University Press, pp. 104–31.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. 1977. ‘Filters and control’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425504.Google Scholar
Croft, W. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dresher, E. 1999. ‘Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting’, Linguistic Inquiry 30: 2768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. 1990. ‘Understood subjects in English diaries’, Multilingua 9: 157–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2006. ‘Against markedness (and what to replace it with)’, Journal of Linguistics 42: 2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, E. 2005. ‘Deconstructing markedness: A predictability-based approach. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 182–98. Available on line http://elanguage.net/journals/bls/article/viewFile/796/685.Google Scholar
Hume, E. 2011. ‘Markedness’, in van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C.J., Hume, E. and Rice, K. (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 1. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 79106.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. 1986. Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1941. Kindersparche, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. English translation: Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals, trans. Kiesler, A.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Koster, J. and Reuland, E. (eds.) 1991. Long-distance anaphora. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. R. and Savoia, L. 2007. A unification of morphology and syntax: Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pires, A. and Taylor, H. 2007. ‘The syntax of wh-in situ and common ground’, Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 43(2): 201–15.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1986. ‘Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–57.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. and Roussou, A. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1988. ‘Language acquisition: Learnability, maturation, and the fixing of parameters’, Cognitive Neuropsychology 5(2): 235–65.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. 1931. ‘Die phonologischen Systeme’, Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 4: 96116.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. 1996. The prefunctional stage of first language acquisition: A crosslinguistic study. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. 2005. ‘Peripheral positions in early Greek’, in Stavrou, M. and Terzi, A. (eds.), Advances in Greek generative syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 179216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. and Hulk, A. 2013. ‘Grammatical gender and the notion of default: Insights from language acquisition’, Lingua 137: 128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlachos, C. 2012. ‘Wh-constructions and the division of labour between syntax and the interfaces’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Patras.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. and Manzini, M. R. 1987. ‘Parameters and learnability in binding theory’, in Roeper, T. and Williams, E. (eds.), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 4176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. 1978. ‘On markedness in morphology’, Die Sprache 24: 129–43.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×