Application Areas of Interaction Analysis

Part II - Application Areas of Interaction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018

Edited by

Elisabeth Brauner ,

Margarete Boos and

Michaela Kolbe

Show author details

Elisabeth Brauner: Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos: Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe: Affiliation:
ETH Zürich

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 43 - 162

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286302 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. S., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., Williams, T., Melton, J., & Clements, M. L. (2008). Premarital precursors of infidelity. Family Process, 47, 243–259. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00251.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bakeman, R., McArthur, D., & Quera, V. (1996). Detecting group differences in sequential association using sampled permutations: Log odds, kappa, and phi compared. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 446–457. doi:10.3758/BF03200524CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1992). SDIS: A sequential data interchange standard. Behavior Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 554–559. doi:10.3758/BF03203604CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995a). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1958). Naven. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1936).CrossRef Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. H. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251–264. doi:10.1002/bs.3830010402CrossRef Google Scholar

Baucom, K. J. W., Baucom, B. R., & Christensen, A. (2015). Changes in dyadic communication after traditional and integrative behavioral couple therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 65, 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.004CrossRef Google Scholar

Baucom, K. J. W., Sevier, M., Eldrigde, K. A., & Doss, B. D. (2011). Observed communication in couples two years after integrative and traditional behavioral couple therapy: Outcome and link with five-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 565–576. doi:10.1037/a0025121CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bavelas, J. B., Rogers, L. E., & Millar, F. E. (1985). Interpersonal conflict. In van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 9–26). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392–423. doi.org/10.1037/h0037024 CrossRef Google Scholar

Beyebach, M., & Escudero Carranza, V. (1997). Therapeutic interaction and dropout: Measuring relational communication in solution-focused therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 173–212. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00047CrossRef Google Scholar

Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295–318. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295CrossRef Google Scholar

Cartensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140–149. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.140CrossRef Google Scholar

Clements, M. L., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Before they said “I do”: Discriminating among marital outcomes over 13 years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 613–626. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00041.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Coady, N. F., & Marziali, E. (1994). The association between global and specific measures of the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 31, 17–27. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.31.1.17CrossRef Google Scholar

Cordova, J. V., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Rushe, R., & Cox, G. (1993). Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 559–564. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.102.4.559CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Courtright, J. A., Fairhurst, G. T., & Rogers, L. E. (1989). Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 773–802. doi:10.2307/256568CrossRef Google Scholar

Courtright, J. A., Millar, F. E., & Rogers-Millar, L. E. (1979). Domineeringness and dominance: Replication and expansion. Communication Monographs, 46, 179–192. doi:10.1080/03637757909376005CrossRef Google Scholar

Eggly, S., & Tzelepis, A. (2001). Relational control in difficult physician-patient encounters: Negotiating treatment for pain. Journal of Health Communication, 6, 323–333. doi:10.1080/108107301317140814Google Scholar PubMed

Eide, H., Quera, V., Graugaard, P., & Finset, A. (2003). Physician-patient dialogue surrounding patients’ expression of concern: Applying sequence analysis to RIAS. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.011CrossRef Google Scholar

Ericson, P. M., & Rogers, L. E. (1973). New procedures for analyzing relational communication. Family Process, 12, 245–267. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1973.00245.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Escudero, V., & Rogers, L.E. (2004a). Observing relational communication. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Escudero, V., & Rogers, L. E. (2004b). Analyzing relational communication. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Escudero, V., Rogers, L. E., & Gutierrez, E. (1997). Patterns of relational control and nonverbal affect in clinic and nonclinic couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 5–29. doi:10.1177/0265407597141001CrossRef Google Scholar

Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Organizational relational control research: Problems and possibilities. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 197–215). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fairhurst, G. T., Green, S., & Courtright, J. (1995). Inertial forces and the implementation of a socio-technical systems approach: A communication study. Organization Science, 6, 168–185. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.2.168CrossRef Google Scholar

Fairhurst, G. T., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 1043–1062. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedlander, M. L. (1982). Counseling discourse as a speech event: Revision and extension of the Hill Counselor Verbal Response Category System. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 425–429. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.29.4.425CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedlander, M. L. (1993). Does complementarity promote or hinder client change in brief therapy?: A review of the evidence from two theoretical perspectives. The Counseling Psychologist, 21, 457–486. doi:10.1177/0011000093213010CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedlander, M. L., Siegel, S. M., & Brenock, K. (1989). Parallel processes in counseling supervision: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 149–157. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.149CrossRef Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M. (Ed.). (1996). What predicts divorce?: The measures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. The Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 737–745. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M., Levenson, R. W., Swanson, C., Swanson, K., Tyson, R., & Yoshimoto, D. (2003). Observing gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples’ relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflictual interaction. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 65–91. doi:10.1300/J082v45n01_04CrossRef Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. (1990). Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data: Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Haley, J. (1963). Strategies of psychotherapy. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heatherington, L., & Allen, G. J. (1984). Sex and relational communication patterns in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 287–294. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.31.3.287CrossRef Google Scholar

Heatherington, L., Escudero, V., & Friedlander, M. L. (2005). Couple interaction during problem discussions: Toward an integrative methodology. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 191–207. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0503_2CrossRef Google Scholar

Henry, W. P., Schacht, T. E., & Strupp, H. H. (1986). Structural analysis of social behavior: Application to a study of interpersonal process in differential psychotherapeutic outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 27–31. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.54.1.27CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interactions: 30 years of research. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 351–374. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.082905.093959 CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, S. L., & Jacob, T. (2000). Sequential interactions in the marital communication of depressed men and women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 4–12. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.1.4CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ladany, N., Friedlander, M. L., & Nelson, M. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Google Scholar

Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York, NY: Ronald Press.Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, J. W., & Barké, K. H. (1981). Investigation of transactional communication relationship patterns in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 471–480. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.471CrossRef Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, J. W., & Tracey, J. G. (2003). Interaction rules and strategies in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 267–275. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.267CrossRef Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, J. W., Wettersten, K. B., Mull, H., Moberly, R. L., Merkley, K. B., Corey, A. T. (1998). Relationship formation and relational control as correlates of psychotherapy quality and outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 322–337. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.322CrossRef Google Scholar

Millar, F. E., & Rogers, L. E. (1887). Relational dimensions of interpersonal dynamics. In Roloff, M. & Miller, G. R. (Eds.), Explorations in interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 117–139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Millar, F. E., Rogers, L. E., & Bavelas, J. B. (1984). Identifying patterns of verbal conflict in interpersonal dynamics. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 232–246.CrossRef Google Scholar

Muñiz de la Peña, C., Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., and Heatherington, L. (2012). How do therapists ally with adolescents in family therapy? An examination of relational control communication in early sessions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 339–351. doi:10.1037/a0028063CrossRef Google Scholar

Notarius, C. I., & Markman, H. J. (1981). The Couples Interaction Scoring System. In Filsinger, E. & Lewis, R. (Eds.), Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches (pp. 112–127). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Notarius, C. I., Markman, H. J., & Gottman, J. M. (1983). The Couples Interaction Scoring System: Clinical issue. In Filsinger, E. (Ed.), Marriage and family assessment: A sourcebook for family therapy (pp. 117–136). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

O’Hair, D. (1989). Dimensions of relational communication and control during physician-patient interactions. Health Communication, 1(2), 97–115. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0102_2CrossRef Google Scholar

Patterson, G. R., Weiss, R. L., & Hops, H. (1976). Training of marital skills: Some problems and concepts. In Leitenberg, H. (Ed.), Handbook of behavior modification and behavior therapy (pp. 242–254). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Quera, V., & Bakeman, R. (2000). Quantification strategies in behavioral observation research. In Thompson, T., Felce, D., & Symons, F. J. (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 297–315). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Raymond, L., Friedlander, M. L., Heatherington, L., Ellis, M. V., & Sargent, J. (1993). Communication processes in structural family therapy: Case study of an anorexic family. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 308–326. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.29.4.425CrossRef Google Scholar

Rehman, U. S., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2006). A cross-cultural analysis of the demand-withdraw marital interaction: Observing couples from a developing country. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 755–766. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.755CrossRef Google Scholar

Rogers, L. E., Castleton, A., & Lloyd, S. A. (1996). Relational control and physical aggression in satisfying marital relationships. In Cahn, D. D. & Lloyd, S. A. (Eds.), Family violence from a communication perspective (pp. 218–239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rogers, L. E., & Escudero, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Rogers, L. E., & Farace, R. V. (1975). Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222–239. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00270.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Roter, D. (1977). Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: The effects of patient question-asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Education Monographs, 5, 281–330. doi:10.1177/109019817700500402CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Roter, D., & Larson, S. (2002). The Roter Interaction Analysis System: Utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling, 46, 243–251. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00012-5CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sabourin, T. C. (1995). The role of negative reciprocity in spouse abuse: A relational control analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 271–283. doi:10.1080/00909889509365431CrossRef Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Strong, S. R., Hills, H. I., Kilmartin, C. T., DeVries, H., Lanier, K., Nelson, B. N., Strickland, D., & Meyer, C. W. III (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomplementarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 798–810. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.798CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Tomm, K. (2014). Introducing the IPscope: A systematic assessment tool for distinguishing interpersonal patterns. In Tomm, K., St. George, S., Wulff, D., & Strong, T. (Eds.), Patterns in interpersonal interactions: Inviting relational understandings for therapeutic change (pp. 13–35). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tracey, J. G., Bludworth, J., & Glidden-Tracey, C. E. (2012). Are there parallel processes in psychotherapy supervision: An empirical examination. Psychotherapy, 49, 330–343. doi:10.1037/a0026246CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tracey, T. J., & Miars, R. D. (1986). Interpersonal control in psychotherapy: A comparison of two definitions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 585–592. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198607)42:4<585::aid-jclp2270420407>3.0.CO;2-L3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tracey, T. J., & Ray, P. B. (1984). Stages of successful time-limited counseling: An interactional examination. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 13–27. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.1.13CrossRef Google Scholar

von Friederichs-Fitzwater, M. M., Callahan, E. J., Flynn, N., & Williams, J. (1991). Relational control in physician-patient encounters. Health Communication, 3, 17–36. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0301_2CrossRef Google Scholar

von Friederichs-Fitzwater, M. M., & Gilgun, J. (2001). Relational control in physician-patient encounters. Health Communication, 13, 75–87. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1301_07CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wampold, B. E. (1989). Kappa as a measure of pattern in sequential data. Quality and Quantity, 23, 171–187. doi:10.1007/BF00151902CrossRef Google Scholar

Wampold, B. E. (1992). The intensive examination of social interaction. In Kratochvill, T. R. & Levin, J. R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 93–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Watson, K. M. (1982). An analysis of communication patterns: A method for discriminating leader and member roles. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 107–120. doi:10.2307/256027CrossRef Google Scholar

Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Wigginton Cecil, D. (1998). Relational control patterns in physician-patient clinical encounters: Continuing the conversation. Health Communication, 10, 125–150. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1002_2CrossRef Google Scholar

Williamson, R. N., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1985). Two approaches to marital interaction: Relational control patterns in marital types. Communication Monographs, 52, 236–252. doi:10.1080/03637758509376108CrossRef Google Scholar

Yoder, P. J., & Feurer, I. D. (2000). Quantifying the magnitude of sequential association between events of behaviors. In Thompson, T., Felce, D., & Symons, F. J. (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 317–333). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.Google Scholar

References

Allen, J. A., Yoerger, M. A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Jones, J. (2015). Would you please stop that!?: The relationship between counterproductive meeting behaviors, employee voice, and trust. Journal of Management Development, 34, 1272–1287. doi:10.1108/JMD-02-2015-0032CrossRef Google Scholar

Argyris, C. (2002). Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 206–218. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2002.8509400CrossRef Google Scholar

Arora, S., Ahmed, M., Paige, J., Nestel, D., Runnacles, J., Hull, L., … Sevdalis, N. (2012). Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD): Bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery. Annals of Surgery, 256, 982–988. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182610c91CrossRef Google Scholar

Ballard, D. I., Tschan, F., & Waller, M. J. (2008). All in the timing: Considering time at multiple stages of group research. Small Group Research, 39, 328–351. doi:org/10.1177/1046496408317036 CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bhanji, F., Mancini, M. E., Sinz, E., Rodgers, D. L., McNeil, M. A., Hoadley, T. A.,… Hazinski, M. F. (2010). Part 16: Education, implementation, and teams. American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care 122 (18 suppl 3), S920–S933. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.971135Google Scholar PubMed

Boos, M., Kolbe, M., & Strack, M. (2011). An inclusive model of group coordination. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 11–36). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boos, M., Pritz, J., Lange, S., & Belz, M. (2014). Leadership in moving human groups. PLoS Computational Biology, 10, e1003541. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003541CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brauer, D. G., Strand, M. S., Sanford, D. E., Kushnir, V. M., Lim, K.-H., Mullady, D. K.,… Fields, R. C. (2017). Utility of a multidisciplinary tumor board in the management of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal diseases: an observational study. HPB, 19, 133–139. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brett-Fleegler, M., Rudolph, J. W., Eppich, W. J., Monuteaux, M., Fleegler, E., Cheng, A., & Simon, R. (2012). Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare. Development and psychometric properties. Simulation in Healthcare, 7, 288–294. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182620228CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brodbeck, F. & Greitemeyer, T. (2000). A dynamic model of group performance: Considering the group members’ capacity to learn. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 159–182. doi:10.1177/1368430200003002004CrossRef Google Scholar

Burtscher, M. J., Manser, T., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Grande, B., Spahn, D. R., & Wacker, J. (2011). Adaptation in anaesthesia team coordination in response to a simulated critical event and its relationship to clinical performance. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 10, 801–806. doi:10.1093/bja/aer039CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Sherbino, J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 48, 657–666. doi:10.1111/medu.12432CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cooper, J. B., Newbower, R. S., & Kitz, R. J. (1984). An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: Considerations for prevention and detection. Anesthesiology, 60, 34–42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cooper, S. J., & Cant, R. P. (2014). Measuring non-technical skills of medical emergency teams: An update on the validity and reliability of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation, 85(1), 31–33. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.08.276CrossRef Google Scholar

Couto, T. B., Kerrey, B. T., Taylor, R. G., FitzGerald, M., & Geis, G. L. (2015). Teamwork skills in actual, in situ, and in-center pediatric emergencies: Performance levels across settings and perceptions of comparative educational impact. Simulation in Healthcare, 10, 76–84. doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000081CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 571–612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297CrossRef Google Scholar

DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. (2012). A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 997–1015. doi:org/10.1037/a0028244 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dietz, A. S., Pronovost, P. J., Benson, K. N., Mendez-Tellez, P. A., Dwyer, C., Wyskiel, R., & Rosen, M. A. (2014). A systematic review of behavioural marker systems in healthcare: what do we know about their attributes, validity and application? BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 1031–1039. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002457CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eddy, E. R., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Mathieu, J. E. (2013). Helping teams to help themselves: Comparing two team-led debriefing methods. Personnel Psychology, 66, 975–1008. doi:10.1111/peps.12041CrossRef Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999CrossRef Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Ellis, S., Ganzach, Y., Castle, E., & Sekely, G. (2010). The effect of filmed versus personal after-event reviews on task performance: The mediating and moderating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 122–131. doi:10.1037/a0017867CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ellis, S., Mendel, R., & Aloni-Zohar, M. (2009). The effect of accuracy of performance evaluation on learning from experience: The moderating role of After-Event Reviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 541–563. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00450.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Eppich, W., Mullan, P. C., Brett-Fleegler, M., & Cheng, A. (2016). “Let’s talk about it”: translating lessons from healthcare simulation to clinical event debriefings and clinical coaching conversations. Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine, 17, 200–211. doi:10.1016/j.cpem.2016.07.001CrossRef Google Scholar

Farrugia, D. J., Fischer, T. D., Delitto, D., Spiguel, L. R. P., & Shaw, C. M. (2015). Improved breast cancer care quality metrics after implementation of a standardized tumor board documentation template. Journal of Oncology Practice, 11, 421–423. doi:10.1200/jop.2015.003988CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fernandez Castelao, E., Russo, S. G., Cremer, S., Strack, M., Kaminski, L., Eich, C.,… Boos, M. (2011). Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation, 82, 1338–1343. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.009CrossRef Google Scholar

Fernandez Castelao, E., Russo, S. G., Riethmüller, M., & Boos, M. (2013). Effects of team coordination during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Critical Care, 28, 504–521. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.01.005CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2004). Rating non-technical skills: Developing a behavioral marker system for use in anaesthesia. Cognition, Technology, & Work, 6, 165–171. doi:10.1007/s10111-004-0158-yCrossRef Google Scholar

Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.). (2009). Safer surgery: Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Graumann, C. F. (1979). Die Scheu des Psychologen vor der Interaktion. Ein Schisma und seine Geschichte [The unease of the psychologist in face of interaction. A schism and its history]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 10, 284–304.Google Scholar

Grote, G., Kolbe, M., Zala-Mezö, E., Bienefeld-Seall, N., & Künzle, B. (2010). Adaptive coordination and heedfulness make better cockpit crews. Ergonomics, 52, 211–228. doi:10.1080/00140130903248819CrossRef Google Scholar

Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15. doi:org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0061 CrossRef Google Scholar

Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N.-K., & Naegele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 127–142. doi:org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.002 CrossRef Google Scholar

Homayounfar, K., Mey, D., Boos, M., Gaedcke, J., & Ghadimi, M. (2015). Communication in the tumor board. Forum, 30, 214–217. doi:10.1007/s12312-015-1301-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Hull, L., Russ, S., Ahmed, M., Sevdalis, N., & Birnbach, D. J. (2017). Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), 9–16. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000125CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunziker, S., Johansson, A. C., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Rock, L., Howell, M. D., & Marsch, S. (2011). Teamwork and leadership in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57, 2381–2388. doi:org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.017 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Husebø, S. E., Dieckmann, P., Rystedt, H., Søreide, E., & Friberg, F. (2013). The relationship between facilitators’ questions and the level of reflection in postsimulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 8, 135–142. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827cbb5cCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jones, K., Rosen, M., Duval-Arnould, J., & Hunt, E. (2014). Development of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation non-technical skills scoring tool (CPR-NTS). Critical Care Medicine, 42, A1427. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000457773.66160.b8CrossRef Google Scholar

Keating, N. L., Landrum, M. B., Lamont, E. B., Bozeman, S. R., Shulman, L. N., & McNeil, B. J. (2013). Tumor boards and the quality of cancer care. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105, 113–121. doi:10.1093/jnci/djs502CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kehl, K. L., Landrum, M. B., Kahn, K. L., Gray, S. W., Chen, A. B., & Keating, N. L. (2015). Tumor board participation among physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer. Journal of Oncology Practice, 11, e267–e278. doi:10.1200/jop.2015.003673CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kemper, P. F., van Noord, I., de Bruijne, M., Knol, D. L., Wagner, C., & van Dyck, C. (2013). Development and reliability of the explicit professional oral communication observation tool to quantify the use of non-technical skills in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 586–595. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001451CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kessler, D. O., Cheng, A., & Mullan, P. C. (2015). Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: A practical guide. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 65, 690–698. doi:org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.019 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kim, T., McFee, E., Olguin Olguin, D., Waber, B., & Pentland, A. (2012). Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 412–427. doi:10.1002/job.1776CrossRef Google Scholar

Kolbe, M. (2007). Koordination von Entscheidungsprozessen in Gruppen. Die Bedeutung expliziter Koordinationsmechanismen. [Coordination of decision making in groups. The importance of explicit coordination mechanisms.] Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM.Google Scholar

Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M., & Manser, T. (2013). Co-ACT – A framework for observing coordination behavior in acute care teams. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 596–605. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., Manser, T., Künzle, B., & Grote, G. (2011). The role of coordination for preventing harm in healthcare groups: Research examples from anaesthesia and an integrated model of coordination for action teams in healthcare. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 75–92). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Nohynkova, R., Manser, T.,… Grote, G. (2012). Speaking-up is related to better team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions: An observational study. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 115, 1099–1108. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318269cd32CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kolbe, M., Grande, B., & Spahn, D. R. (2015). Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude, and setting. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 29(1). doi:org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M., & Spahn, D. (2014). Monitoring and talking to the room: Autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1254–1267. doi:org/10.1037/a0037877 CrossRef Google Scholar

Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behaviour in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 203–221). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., Spahn, D. R., & Grote, G. (2010). Adaptive coordination makes better anesthesia crews. Paper presented at the 25th SIOP Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Kolbe, M., Marty, A., Seelandt, J., & Grande, B. (2016). How to debrief teamwork interactions: using circular questions to explore and change team interaction patterns. Advances in Simulation, 1(1), 29. doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0029-7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kolbe, M., Strack, M., Stein, A., & Boos, M. (2011). Effective coordination in human group decision making: MICRO-CO. A micro-analytical taxonomy for analysing explicit coordination mechanisms in decision-making groups. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 199–219). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Konradt, U., Schippers, M. C., Garbers, Y., & Steenfatt, C. (2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 777–795. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1005608CrossRef Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 270–299. doi:10.1177/2041386614533586CrossRef Google Scholar

Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., Kolbe, M., & Grote, G. (2010). Leadership in anaesthesia teams: The most effective leadership is shared. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19, 1–6. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.030262Google Scholar PubMed

Lamb, B. W., Green, J. S. A., Benn, J., Brown, K. F., Vincent, C. A., & Sevdalis, N. (2013). Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: Prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 217, 412–420. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.035CrossRef Google Scholar

Lamb, B. W., Sevdalis, N., Mostafid, H., Vincent, C., & Green, J. S. A. (2011). Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: An investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 18, 3535–3543. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1773-5CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Larson, J. J. R., Sargis, E. G., Elstein, A. S., & Schwartz, A. (2002). Holding shared versus unshared information: Its impact on perceived member influence in decision-making groups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 145–155. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2402_6CrossRef Google Scholar

Larson, J. R. J., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Franz, T. M. (1998). Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 482–495. doi:org/10.1177/0146167298245004 CrossRef Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2017). Team learning. Small Group Research, 48, 123–130. doi:0.1177/1046496416689308CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Allen, J. A., & Kauffeld, S. (2013). A sequential analysis of procedural meeting communication: How teams facilitate their meetings. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41, 365–388. doi:10.1080/00909882.2013.844847CrossRef Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Chiu, M. M., Lei, Z., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). Understanding positivity within dynamic team interactions. Group & Organization Management, 42(1), 39–78. doi:10.1177/1059601116628720CrossRef Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meinecke, A. L., Rowold, J., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A behavioral process analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 1017–1033. doi:org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meyers, R. A., Kauffeld, S., Neininger, A., & Henschel, A. (2011). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of team planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639–668. doi:10.1177/1046496411398397CrossRef Google Scholar

Lei, Z., Waller, M. J., Hagen, J., & Kaplan, S. (2016). Team adaptiveness in dynamic contexts: Contextualizing the roles of interaction patterns and in-process planning. Group & Organization Management, 41, 491–525. doi:10.1177/1059601115615246CrossRef Google Scholar

Manser, T., Dieckmann, P., Wehner, T., & Rall, M. (2007). Comparison of anaesthetists’ activity patterns in the operating room and during simulation. Ergonomics, 50, 246–260. doi:10.1080/00140130601032655CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Manser, T., Howard, S. K., & Gaba, D. M. (2008). Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: A study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics, 51, 1153–1178. doi:10.1080/00140130801961919CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785CrossRef Google Scholar

Marshall, C. L., Petersen, N. J., Naik, A. D., Velde, N. V., Artinyan, A., Albo, D., … Anaya, D. A. (2014). Implementation of a regional virtual tumor board: A prospective study evaluating feasibility and provider acceptance. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 20, 705–711. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0320CrossRef Google Scholar

Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160. doi:10.1177/0149206313503014CrossRef Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology. Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546. doi:10.1037/a0013773CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Knowing others’ preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 794–808. doi:org/10.1037/a0017627 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mullan, P. C., Kessler, D. O., & Cheng, A. (2014). Educational opportunities with postevent debriefing. JAMA, 312, 2333–2334. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15741CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nestel, D., Walker, K., Simon, R., Aggarwal, R., & Andreatta, P. (2011). Nontechnical skills: An inaccurate and unhelpful descriptor? Simulation in Healthcare, 6(1), 2–3. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182069587CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pox, C., Aretz, S., Bischoff, S. C., Graeven, U., Hass, M., Heußner, P., … Schmiegel, W. (2013). S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom Version 1.0 – Juni 2013 AWMF-Registernummer: 021/007OL. [S3-Guideline Colorectal Cancer Version 1.0]. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie, 51, 753–854. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1350264Google Scholar

Reynard, J., Reynolds, J., & Stevenson, P. (2009). Practical patient safety. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Riethmüller, M., Fernandez Castelao, E., Eberhardt, D., Timmermann, A., & Boos, M. (2012). Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: A longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 55(1), 55–68. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.636455CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Robertson, E. R., Hadi, M., Morgan, L. J., Pickering, S. P., Collins, G., New, S.,… Catchpole, K. C. (2014). Oxford NOTECHS II: A modified theatre team non-technical skills scoring system. PLoS ONE, 9, e90320. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090320CrossRef Google Scholar

Roe, R. A. (2008). Time in applied psychology: The study of “what happens” rather than “what is”. European Psychologist, 13(1), 37–52. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.37CrossRef Google Scholar

Roe, R. A. (2011). What is wrong with mediators and moderators? Paper presented at the 15th European Congress of Work & Organizational Psychology, Maastricht, Netherlands.CrossRef Google Scholar

Roe, R. A. (2014). Test validity from a temporal perspective: Incorporating time in validation research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 754–768. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.804177CrossRef Google Scholar

Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Rivard, P., Dufresne, R. L., & Raemer, D. B. (2007). Debriefing with good judgment: Combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiology Clinics, 25, 361–376. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.007CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Salas, E., & Frush, K. (Eds.). (2013). Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36, 555–599. doi:10.1177/1046496405277134CrossRef Google Scholar

Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S., Cohen, D., & Latham, G. (Eds.). (2013). Developing and enhancing teamwork in organisations: Evidence-based best practices and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Schmutz, J., Hoffman, F., Heimberg, E., & Manser, T. (2015). Effective coordination in medical emergency teams: The moderating role of task type. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 24, 761–776. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1018184CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmutz, J. B., & Eppich, W. J. (2017). Promoting learning and patient care through shared reflection: A conceptual framework for team reflexivity in health care. Academic Medicine. Advance online publication. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001688CrossRef Google Scholar

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Seelandt, J., Grande, B., Kriech, S., & Kolbe, M. (2017). DE-CODE: A coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000233CrossRef Google Scholar

Seelandt, J. C., Kolbe, M., Heckel, H., & Grande, B. (2016). Enhancing team learning in acute care team by using debriefings. Paper presented at the SESAM, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar

Seelandt, J. C., Tschan, F., Keller, S., Beldi, G., Jenni, N., Kurmann, A., … Semmer, N. K. (2014). Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: developing an event-based method for direct observation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 918–929. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shah, S., Arora, S., Atkin, G., Glynne-Jones, R., Mathur, P., Darzi, A., & Sevdalis, N. (2014). Decision-making in colorectal cancer tumor board meetings: Results of a prospective observational assessment. Surgical Endoscopy, 28, 2783–2788. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3545-3CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Snyder, J., Schultz, L., & Walbert, T. (2017). The role of tumor board conferences in neuro-oncology: a nationwide provider survey. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 133(1), 1–7. doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2416-xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Soar, J., Mancini, M. E., Bhanji, F., Billi, J. E., Dennett, J., Finn, J., … Morley, P. T. (2010). Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams. Resuscitation, 81(1), e288–e332. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.030CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stachowski, A. A., Kaplan, S. A., & Waller, M. J. (2009). The benefits of flexible team interaction during crisis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1536–1543. doi:10.1037/a0016903CrossRef Google Scholar

Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426–434. doi:org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426 CrossRef Google Scholar

Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1578. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467CrossRef Google Scholar

Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81CrossRef Google Scholar

Su, L., Kaplan, S., Burd, R., Winslow, C., Hargrove, A., & Waller, M. (2017). Trauma resuscitation: can team behaviours in the prearrival period predict resuscitation performance? BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 106–110. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000143CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tafe, L. J., Gorlov, I. P., de Abreu, F. B., Lefferts, J. A., Liu, X., Pettus, J. R., … Chamberlin, M. D. (2015). Implementation of a molecular tumor board: The impact on treatment decisions for 35 patients evaluated at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. The Oncologist, 20, 1011–1018. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0097CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Conducting team debriefings that work: Lessons from research and practice. In Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Cohen, D., & Latham, G. (Eds.), Developing and enhancing teamwork in organizations: Evidence-based best practices and guidelines (pp. 488–519). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2–24. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01396.xCrossRef Google Scholar

The Center for Medical Simulation. (2010). Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH)©. Rater’s Handbook. Retrieved September 23, 2013, from www.harvardmedsim.org/_media/DASH.handbook.2010.Final.Rev.2.pdf.Google Scholar

Thenappan, A., Halaweish, I., Mody, R. J., Smith, E. A., Geiger, J. D., Ehrlich, P. F., … Newman, E. A. (2017). Review at a multidisciplinary tumor board impacts critical management decisions of pediatric patients with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 64, 254–258. doi:10.1002/pbc.26201CrossRef Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Seelandt, J. C., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical-site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 102, 1718–1725. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRef Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Gautschi, D., Hunziker, P., Spychiger, M., & Marsch, S. U. (2006). Leading to recovery: Group performance and coordinative activities in medical emergency driven groups. Human Performance, 19, 277–304. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1903_5CrossRef Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Gurtner, A., Bizzari, L., Spychiger, M., Breuer, M., & Marsch, S. U. (2009). Explicit reasoning, confirmation bias, and illusory transactive memory. A simulation study of group medical decision making. Small Group Research, 40, 271–300. doi:10.1177/1046496409332928CrossRef Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, S., Kolbe, M., Jenni, N., & Marsch, S. U. (2014). Leadership in different resuscitation situations. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 4, 32–36. doi:org/10.1016/j.tacc.2013.12.001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Vetterli, M., Gurtner, A., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. U. (2011). Developing observational categories for group process research based on task and coordination-requirement analysis: Examples from research on medical emergency-driven teams. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 93–118). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., Healey, A. N., Darzi, A., & Vincent, C. A. (2007). Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS): Refinement and application in urological surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 31, 1373–1381. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9053-zCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2009). Observing and assessing surgical teams: The Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS). In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 83–101). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Valentine, M. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2015). Measuring teamwork in health care settings: A review of survey instruments. Medical Care, 53, e16–e30. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feef6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., & Erez, M. (2013). Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 945–971. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0501CrossRef Google Scholar

Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Dambach, M., Marty, A., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2014). Agency and communion predict speaking up in acute care teams. Small Group Research, 45, 290–313. doi:10.1177/1046496414531495CrossRef Google Scholar

Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2017). Why didn’t you say something? Using after-event reviews to affect voice behavior and hierarchy beliefs in multi-professional action teams. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 26(1), 66–80. doi:org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1208652 CrossRef Google Scholar

Wittenbaum, G. M., Bowman, J. M., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2003). Strategic information sharing in mixed-motive decision-making groups. Paper presented at the Small Group Division of the National Communication Association. Miami, FL.Google Scholar

Woolley, A. W., Aggarwal, I., & Malone, T. W. (2015). Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 420–424. doi:10.1177/0963721415599543CrossRef Google Scholar

Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686–688. doi:10.1126/science.1193147CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S., Maran, N., & Rowley, D. (2006). Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Medical Education, 40, 1098–1104. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02610.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., Künzle, B., Brüesch, M., & Grote, G. (2009). The influence of standardisation and task load on team coordination patterns during anaesthesia inductions. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18, 127–130. doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.025973CrossRef Google Scholar

Zijlstra, F. R. H., Waller, M. J., & Phillips, S. I. (2012). Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 749–777. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.690399CrossRef Google Scholar

References

Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bliese, P. D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362–387. doi:10.1177/109442802237116CrossRef Google Scholar

Boos, M., Pritz, J., Lange, S., & Belz, M. (2014). Leadership in moving human groups. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(4), e1003541. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003541Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593CrossRef Google Scholar

Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in geographically dispersed teams, Organization Science, 12, 346–371. doi.10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098CrossRef Google Scholar

Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297CrossRef Google Scholar

DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, 5(2), 121–147. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121CrossRef Google Scholar

Dutton, J., Workman, K., & Hardin, A. (2014). Compassion at Work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 277–304. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091221CrossRef Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305CrossRef Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586086CrossRef Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In Devine, P., & Plant, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 47 (pp. 1–54). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gevers, J. M., van Eerde, W., & Roe, R. (2014). The relevance of time in organizations and organizational studies: Introduction to the special issue. Gedrag & Organisatie, 27(1), 5–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibson, C. B. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 193–223. doi:10.1177/1094428116639133CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibson, D. R. (2003). Participation shifts: Order and differentiation in group conversation. Social Forces, 81, 1335–1381. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0055CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibson, D. R. (2005). Taking turns and talking ties: Network structure and conversational sequences. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1561–1597. doi:10.1086/428689CrossRef Google Scholar

Hackman, J. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd edn.), New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130–158. doi:10.1177/1046496411429599CrossRef Google Scholar

Kauffeld, S., & Meyers, R. A. (2009). Complaint and solution-oriented circles in work groups. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 267–294. doi:10.1080/13594320701693209CrossRef Google Scholar

King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In Cassell, C. & Symon, G. (Eds.) Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M. & Spahn, D. R. (2014). Monitoring and talking to the room: Autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1254–1267. doi:10.1037/a0037877CrossRef Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270–299. doi:10.1177/2041386614533586CrossRef Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2008). Team learning, development, and adaptation. In Sessa, V.I. & Lonson, M. (Eds.), Work group learning (pp. 15–44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meyers, R. A., Kauffeld, S., Neininger, A., & Henschel, A. (2011). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639–668. doi:10.1177/1046496411398397CrossRef Google Scholar

Lei, Z., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2015). Affect in meetings: An interpersonal construct in dynamic interaction processes. In Allen, J. A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Rogelberg, S. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 456–482). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lei, Z., Waller, M. J., Hagen, J., & Kaplan, S. (2016). Team adaptiveness in dynamic contexts: Contextualizing the roles of interaction patterns and in-process planning. Group & Organization Management, 41(4), 491–525. doi:10.1177/1059601115615246CrossRef Google Scholar

Magnusson, M. S. (2016). Time and self-similar structure in behavior and interactions: From sequences to symmetry and fractals. In Magnusson, M. S. et al. (Eds.), Discovering Hidden Temporal Patterns in Behavior and Interaction: T-Pattern Detection and Analysis with THEME™, 3–35. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Magnusson, M. S. (2017). Why search for hidden repeated temporal behavior patterns: T-pattern analysis with theme. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapy, 2, 128. https://doi.org/10.15344/2017/2456-3501/128.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mangold, P. (2010). INTERACT quick start manual V2. 4. www.mangold-international.com.Google Scholar

Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785CrossRef Google Scholar

Mathieu, J. E., Marks, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In Anderson, N., Ones, D., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 289–313). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar

Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473–492. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200CrossRef Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Perlow, L., Gittell, J. H., Katz, N. (2004). Contextualizing patterns of work group interaction: Toward a nested theory of structuration. Organization Science, 15(5), 520–536. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0097CrossRef Google Scholar

Picard, R. W., Vyzas, E., & Healey, J. (2001). Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23, 1175–1191. doi:10.1109/34.954607CrossRef Google Scholar

Poh, M., Swenson, N. C., & Picard, R. W. (2010). A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57, 1243–1252. doi:10.1109/TBME.2009.2038487Google Scholar PubMed

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd edn.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ripley, R., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2009). Manual for SIENA Version 4.0. Department of Statistics, Nufield College, University of Oxford, UK.Google Scholar

Riethmüller, M., Fernandez, C. E., Eberhardt, I., Timmermann, A., & Boos, M. (2012). Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 55(1), 55–68. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.636455CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schneeweiss, S. (2014). Learning from big health care data. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(23), 2161–2163. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1401111CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schulte, M., Cohen, N. A., & Klein, K. J. (2012). The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organization Science, 23(2), 564–581. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0582CrossRef Google Scholar

Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (Eds)., Models in social network analysis (pp. 215–247). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In van Montfort, K., Oud, H., Satorra, A. (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 41–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–325. doi:10.2307/3069458CrossRef Google Scholar

Stachowski, A. A., Kaplan, S. A., & Waller, M. J. (2009). The benefits of flexible team interaction during crises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1536–1543. doi:10.1037/a0016903CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sterman, J. D. (1989). Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 301–335. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoolmiller, M., Eddy, J. M., & Reid, J. B. (2000). Detecting and describing preventive intervention effects in a universally school-based randomized trial targeting delinquent and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(2), 296–306.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 61–71. doi:10.1518/001872099779577273CrossRef Google Scholar

Tröster, C., Mehra, A., & van Knippenberg, D.. (2014). Structuring for team success: the interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 245–255. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.04.003CrossRef Google Scholar

Waller, M. J., & Kaplan, S. (2016). Systematic behavioral observation for emergent team phenomena: Key considerations for quantitative video-based approaches. Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1094428116647785CrossRef Google Scholar

Waller, M. J., Lei, Z., & Pratten, R. (2014). Focusing on teams in crisis management education: An integration and simulation-based approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 208–221. doi:10.5465/amle.2012.0337CrossRef Google Scholar

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Vol. 8. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingart, L. R. (2012). Studying dynamics within groups. In Neale, M. A. & Mannix, E. A. (Eds.), Looking back, moving forward: A review of group and team-based research (pp. 1–25). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar

Zellmer-Bruhn, M., Waller, M. J., & Ancona, D. (2004). The effect of temporal entrainment on the ability of teams to change their routines. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Press.Google Scholar

References

Afifi, W. A., & Johnson, M. L. (1999). The use and interpretation of tie signs in a public setting: Relationship and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(1), 9–38. doi:10.1177/0265407599161002CrossRef Google Scholar

Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1987). Measurement and reliability of nonverbal behavior and percepts. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 205–233. doi:10.1007/BF00987254CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (2009). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 163–194. doi:10.1177/0261927X00019002001CrossRef Google Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (2006). Hand gestures and facial displays as part of language use in face-to-face dialogue. In Manusov, V. & Patterson, M. L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 97–115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Boice, R., & Monti, P. M. (1982). Specification of nonverbal behaviors for clinical assessment. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 79–94. doi:10.1007/BF00986870CrossRef Google Scholar

Bonito, J. A., Ruppel, E. K., DeCamp, M. H., & Garreaud de Mainvilliers, I. (2011). Evaluating participation in small groups: Stimulated recall, self-ratings, and their effects on task-relevant judgments. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 28–47. doi:10.1080/19312458.2010.527873CrossRef Google Scholar

Boos, M., Pritz, J., Lange, S., & Belz, M. (2014). Leadership in moving human groups. PLOS Computational Biology, 10(4), e1003541. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003541CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Burgoon, J. K. (1985). The relationship of verbal and nonverbal codes. In Dervin, B. & Voight, M. J. (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 263–298). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., & Baesler, E. J. (1991). Choosing between micro and macro nonverbal measurement: Application to selected vocalic and kinesic indices. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 57–78. doi:10.1007/BF00997767CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., & Dunbar, N. E. (2006). Dominance, power and influence. In Manusov, V. & Patterson, M. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 279–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2010). Nonverbal communication. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., Wilson, D., Hass, M., & Schuetzler, R. (2015). Interactive deception in group decision-making: New insights from communication pattern analysis. In Magnusson, M. S., Burgoon, J. K., & Casarrubea, M. (Eds.), Discovering hidden temporal patterns in behavior and interaction: T-pattern detection and analysis with THEME. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Canary, D., & Dindia, K. (Eds.) (1998). Sex differences and similiarities in communication. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.CrossRef Google Scholar

Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The specific affect coding system (SPAFF). In Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 267–285). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005). Nonverbal measurement of dominance. In Manusov, V. (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 361–374). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., Tower, D. C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2014). Synchronization of nonverbal behaviors in detecting mediated and non-mediated deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 355–376. doi:10.1007/s10919-014-0179-zCrossRef Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1982). Methods for measuring facial action. In Scherer, K. R. & Ekman, P. (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 45–90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98. doi:10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49CrossRef Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215CrossRef Google Scholar

Hale, J. L., Burgoon, J. K., & Householder, B. (2005). Nonverbal measurement of relational communication. In Manusov, V. (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 127–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Harris, M. (1976). History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 5, 329–350.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haviland-Jones, J., Wilson, P. & Freyberg, R. (2016). Signs, signals, and symbols in olfactics. In Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H. C., & Frank, M. G. (Ed). APA handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 363–385). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heath, C., Sanchez Svensson, M., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., & vom Lehn, D. (2002). Configuring awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 317–347. doi:10.1023/A:1021247413718CrossRef Google Scholar

Hewes, G. W. (1957). The anthropology of posture. Scientific American, 196, 123–132. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0257-122CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, S. E. (1994). The right touch: Understanding and using the language of physical contact. Cresshill, NJ: Hampton Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1981). Geography of gesture. Semiotica, 37, 129–163.Google Scholar

Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 78–100. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koch, S. C., Baehne, C. G., Kruse, L., Zimmermann, F., & Zumbach, J. (2010). Visual dominance and visual egalitarianism: Individual and group-level influences of sex and status in group interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(3), 137–153. doi:10.1007/s10919-010-0088-8CrossRef Google Scholar

LaFrance, M., & Broadbent, M. (1976). Group rapport: Posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group & Organization Management, 1(3), 328–333. doi:10.1177/105960117600100307CrossRef Google Scholar

Lepri, B., Staiano, J., Rigato, G., Kalimeri, K., Finnerty, A., Pianesi, F., Sebe, N. & Pentland, A. (2012, September). The sociometric badges corpus: A multilevel behavioral dataset for social behavior in complex organizations. In Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom) (pp. 623–628). IEEE.Google Scholar

Magnusson, M. S. (2005). Understanding social interaction: Discovering hidden structure with model and algorithms. In Anolli, L., Duncan, S. Jr., Magnusson, M. S., & Riva, G. (Eds.), The hidden structure of interaction: From neurons to culture patterns (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar

Magnusson, M., Burgoon, J. K., & Casarrubea, M. (Eds.) (2016). Discovering hidden temporal patterns in behavior and interaction: T-pattern detection and analysis with THEME. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Manusov, V. (2005) (Ed.). The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Meservy, T. O. (2010). CBAS 2.0. University of Arizona, AZ: Center for Identification Technology Research.Google Scholar

Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures, their origins and distribution. New York, NY: Stein & Day.Google Scholar

Noldus (2013). The Observer. Noldus Information Technology.Google Scholar

Patterson, M. L. (1994). Strategic functions of nonverbal exchange. In Daly, J. A. & Wiemann, J. M. (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 273–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Pika, S., Nicoladis, E., & Marentette, P. F. (2006). A cross-cultural study on the use of gestures: Evidence for cross-linguistic transfer? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 319–327. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002665CrossRef Google Scholar

Poggi, I. (2002). Symbolic gestures: The case of the gestionary. Gesture, 2, 71–98. doi:10.1075/gest.2.1.05pogCrossRef Google Scholar

Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., Jurafsky, D., Coccaro, N., Meteer, M., Bates, R., … & Van Ess-Dykema, C. (1998). Can prosody aid in automatic classification of dialog acts in conversational speech? Language and Speech, 41, 439–487. doi:10.1177/002383099804100410CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Waldron, V. R. (1997). Toward a theory of interactive conversational planning. In Greene, J. O. (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 195–220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

References

Akinyi, M. Y., Tung, J., Jeneby, M., Patel, N. B., Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2013). Role of grooming in reducing tick load in wild baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Animal Behavior, 85, 559–568. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.012CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227–263.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aureli, F., Fraser, O. N., Schaffner, C. M., & Schino, G. (2012). The regulation of social relationships. In Mitani, J. C., Call, J., Kappeler, P. M., Palombit, R. A., & Silk, J. B. (Eds.), Evolution of primate societies (pp. 531–550). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Aureli, F., Preston, S. D., & Waal, F. d. (1999). Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): A pilot study. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(1), 59–65.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H., & White, J. S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(3), 127–135. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boyland, N. K., James, R., Mlynski, D. T., Madden, J. R., & Croft, D. P. (2013). Spatial proximity loggers for recording animal social networks: consequences of inter-logger variation in performance. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67(11), 1877–1890. doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1622-6CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, F. E. (2011). Space to choose: network analysis of social preferences in a captive chimpanzee community, and implications for management. American Journal of Primatology, 73(8), 748–757.CrossRef Google Scholar

Croft, D. P., James, R., & Krause, J. (2008). Exploring animal social networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Curtis, D. J., Setchell, J.M., & Talebi, M. (2011). Introduction. In Setchell, J. M. & Curtis, D. J. (Eds.), Field and laboratory methods in primatology: A practical guide (2nd edn., pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray.Google Scholar

de Vries, H. (1995). An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Animal Behavior, 50, 1375–1389.CrossRef Google Scholar

Drickamer, L. C., & Vessey, S. H. (2001). Animal behavior: Mechanisms, ecology, evolution (5th edn.). Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate social systems. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(2), 260–268. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fedigan, L. M. (2010). Ethical issues faced by field primatologists: Asking the relevant questions. American Journal of Primatology, 72(9), 754–771. doi:10.1002/ajp.20814CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Flack, J. C., Girvan, M., de Waal, F. M., & Krakauer, D. C. (2006). Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature, 439(7075), 426–429. doi:10.1038/nature04326CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hinde, R. A. (1976). Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man, 11, 1–17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hinde, R. A., & Atkinson, S. (1970). Assessing the roles of social partners in maintaining mutual proximity, as exemplified by mother-infant relations in rhesus monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 18, 169–176.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hobaiter, C., Poisot, T., Zuberbühler, K., Hoppitt, W., & Gruber, T. (2014). Social network analysis shows direct evidence for social transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees. PLoS Biology, 12(9), e1001960. https:doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001960 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Honess, P. E., & MacDonald, D. W. (2013). Marking and radio-tracking primates. In Setchell, J. M. & Curtis, D. J. (Eds.), Field and laboratory methods in primatology: A practical guide (2nd edn., pp. 189–206). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Hooff, J. M., & Wensing, J. B. (1987). Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive wolf pack. In Frank, H. & Frank, H. (Eds.), Man and wolf: Advances, issues, and problems in captive wolf research (pp. 219–252). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Dr W Junk Publishers.Google Scholar

Janson, C. (2012). Reconciling rigor and range: Observations, experiments, and quasi-experiments in field primatology. International Journal of Primatology, 33(3), 520–541. doi:10.1007/s10764-011-9550-7CrossRef Google Scholar

Ji, W., White, P. L., & Clout, M. N. (2005). Contact rates between possums revealed by proximity data loggers. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(3), 595–604. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01026.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, C. A., Raubenheimer, D., Rothman, J. M., Clarke, D., & Swedell, L. (2013). 30 days in the life: Daily nutrient balancing in a wild chacma baboon. Plos One, 8(7), e70383. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070383CrossRef Google Scholar

Jouventin, P. (1975). Les rôles des colorations du mandrill (Mandrillus sphinx). Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 39, 455–462.Google Scholar

Kappeler, P. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2002). Evolution of primate social systems. International Journal of Primatology, 23(4), 707–740. doi:10.1023/A:1015520830318CrossRef Google Scholar

Krause, J., Croft, D. P., & James, R. (2007). Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: Potential applications. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(1), 15–27. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0445-8CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kurvers, R. M., Krause, J., Croft, D. P., Wilson, A. M., & Wolf, M. (2014). The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: Emerging issues. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(6), 326–335. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lehner, P. N. (1998). Handbook of ethological methods (2nd edn.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lusseau, D., & Newman, M. J. (2004). Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 271, S477–S481. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0225Google Scholar PubMed

MacKinnon, K. C., Riley, E. P., Garber, P. A., Setchell, J. M., & Fernandez-Duque, E. (2014). Code of best practices for field primatology. www.internationalprimatologicalsociety.org/policy.cfm.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, K. C., & Riley, E. P. (2010). Field primatology of today: Current ethical issues. American Journal of Primatology, 72(9), 749–753. doi:10.1002/ajp.20836CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Malone, N. M., Fuentes, A., & White, F. J. (2010). Ethics commentary: Subjects of knowledge and control in field primatology. American Journal of Primatology, 72(9), 779–784. doi:10.1002/ajp.20840CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Martin, R. D., & Bateson, P. P. G. (1994). Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide (2nd edn.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McDonald, M. M., & Johnson, S. (2014). ‘There’s an app for that’: a new program for the collection of behavioural field data. Animal Behaviour, 95, 81–87. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.06.009CrossRef Google Scholar

Mitani, J. C., Call, J., Kappeler, P. M., Palombit, R. A., & Silk, J. B. (Eds.) (2013). The evolution of primate societies. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Neumann, C., Duboscq, J., Dubuc, C., Ginting, A., Irwan, A. M., Agil, M., … Engelhardt, A. (2011). Assessing dominance hierarchies: Validation and advantages of progressive evaluation with Elo-rating. Animal Behaviour, 82(4), 911–921. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.016CrossRef Google Scholar

Nowak, K., le Roux, A., Richards, S. A., Scheijen, C. J., & Hill, R. A. (2014). Human observers impact habituated samango monkeys’ perceived landscape of fear. Behavioral Ecology, 25(5), 1199–1204. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru110CrossRef Google Scholar

Parr, L. A., & Waller, B. M. (2006). Understanding chimpanzee facial expression: Insights into the evolution of communication. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 221–228. doi:10.1093/scan/nsl031CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Perry, S., Godoy, I., & Lammers, W. (2012). The Lomas Barbudal Monkey Project: Two decades of research on Cebus capucinus. In Kappeler, P. M. & Watts, D. P. (Eds.), Long-term field studies of primates (pp. 141–163). Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Preuschoft, S., & van Hooff, J. (1997). The social function of “smile” and “laughter”: Variations across primate species and societies. In Segerstrale, U. & Mobias, P. (Eds.), Nonverbal communication: Where nature meets culture (pp. 252–281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Rushmore, J., Caillaud, D., Matamba, L., Stumpf, R. M., Borgatti, S. P., & Altizer, S. (2013). Social network analysis of wild chimpanzees provides insights for predicting infectious disease risk. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82(5), 976–986. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12088CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Saunders, C. D., & Hausfater, G. (1988). The functional significance of baboon grooming behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 525, 430–432.CrossRef Google Scholar

Setchell, J. M. (2016). Sexual selection and the differences between the sexes in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 159(Suppl 61), S105–S129. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22904CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Setchell, J. M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2003). Selection in relation to sex in primates. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 33, 87–173. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(03)33003-7CrossRef Google Scholar

Setchell, J. M., & Jean Wickings, E. (2005). Dominance, status signals and coloration in male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Ethology, 111(1), 25–50. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01054.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Shutt, K., MacLarnon, A., Heistermann, M., & Semple, S. (2007). Grooming in Barbary macaques: Better to give than to receive?. Biology Letters, 3(3), 231–233. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0052CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Silk, J., Cheney, D., & Seyfarth, R. (2013). A practical guide to the study of social relationships. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22(5), 213–225. doi:10.1002/evan.21367CrossRef Google Scholar

Silk, J. B. (2012). The adaptive value of sociality. In Mitani, J. C., Call, J., Kappeler, P. M., Palombit, R. A., & Silk, J. B. (Eds.), Evolution of primate societies (pp. 552–564). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Silk, J. B., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2003). Social bonds of female baboons enhance infant survival. Science, 302, 1231–1234.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Silk, J. B., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2006). Social relationships among adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus) II. Variation in the quality and stability of social bonds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61(2), 197–204. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0250-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Silk, J. B., Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2006). Social relationships among adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus) I. Variation in the strength of social bonds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61(2), 183–195. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0249-2CrossRef Google Scholar

Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., …Cheney, D. L. (2010). Female chacma baboons form strong, equitable, and enduring social bonds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64(11), 1733–1747. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0986-0CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Simonds, P. E. (1974). Sex differences in bonnet macaque networks and social structure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(2), 151–166.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sueur, C., Jacobs, A., Amblard, F., Petit, O., & King, A. J. (2011). How can social network analysis improve the study of primate behavior? American Journal of Primatology, 73(8), 703–719. doi:10.1002/ajp.20915CrossRef Google Scholar

Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.CrossRef Google Scholar

Veenema, H. (2000). Methodological progress in post-conflict research. In Aureli, F. (Ed.), Natural Conflict Resolution (pp. 21–23). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, E. A., & Feistner, A. T. C. (2011). Habituating primates: Processes, techniques, variables and ethics. In Setchell, J. M., & Curtis, D. J. (Eds.), Field and laboratory methods in primatology: A practical guide (2nd edn., pp. 33–50). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, M. L. (2012). Long-term field studies of the chimpanzees of Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In Kappeler, P. M., & Watts, D. P. (Eds.), Long-term field studies of primates (pp. 357–384). Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, G. H., Coelho, A. M., & Bramblett, C. A. (1982). The development of grooming, sociosexual behavior, play and aggression in captive baboons in their first two years. Primates, 23(4), 511–519. doi:10.1007/BF02373962CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuberbühler, K., & Wittig, R. M. (2011). Field experiments with non-human primates: A tutorial. In Setchell, J. M. & Curtis, D. J. (Eds.), Field and laboratory methods in primatology: A practical guide (2nd edn., pp. 207–224). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

References

Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef Google Scholar

Behoora, I., & Tucker, C. S. (2015). Machine learning classification of design team members’ body language patterns for real time emotional state detection. Design Studies, 39, 100–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Bowers, C. A., Jentsch, F., Salas, E., & Braun, C. C. (1998). Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Human Factors, 40(4), 672–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872098779649265 CrossRef Google Scholar

Butts, C. T. (2008). A relational event framework for social action. Sociological Methodology, 38(1), 155–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2008.00203.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F., & McClintock, M. K. (2000). Multilevel integrative analyses of human behavior: Social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 829–843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.829 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chaffin, D., Heidl, R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Howe, M., Yu, A., Voorhees, C., & Calantone, R. (2017). The promise and perils of wearable sensors in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(1), 3–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428115617004 CrossRef Google Scholar

Chancellor, J., Layous, K., Margolis, S., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2017, March 30). Clustering by well-being in workplace social networks: Homophily and social contagion. Emotion. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000311 CrossRef Google Scholar

de Montjoye, Y. A., Stopczynski, A., Shmueli, E., Pentland, A., & Lehmann, S. (2014). The strength of the strongest ties in collaborative problem solving. Scientific Reports, 4, 5277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05277 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dietz, A. S., Pronovost, P. J., Benson, K. N., Mendez-Tellez, P. A., Dwyer, C., Wyskiel, R., & Rosen, M. A. (2014). A systematic review of behavioural marker systems in healthcare: What do we know about their attributes, validity and application? BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 1031–1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002457 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R. (2016). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1964–1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525205 CrossRef Google Scholar

Elkins, A. N., Muth, E. R., Hoover, A. W., Walker, A. D., Carpenter, T. L., & Switzer, F. S. (2009). Physiological compliance and team performance. Applied Ergonomics, 40(6), 997–1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.02.002 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Funke, G. J., Knott, B. A., Salas, E., Pavlas, D., & Strang, A. J. (2012). Conceptualization and measurement of team workload: A critical need. Human Factors, 54(1), 36–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720811427901 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fusaroli, R., Bjørndahl, J. S., Roepstorff, A., & Tylén, K. (2016). A heart for interaction: Shared physiological dynamics and behavioral coordination in a collective, creative construction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(9), 1297–1310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000207 Google Scholar

Gallup, A. C., Hale, J. J., Sumpter, D. J., Garnier, S., Kacelnik, A., Krebs, J. R., & Couzin, I. D. (2012). Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(19), 7245–7250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116141109 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gorman, J. C., Hessler, E. E., Amazeen, P. G., Cooke, N. J., & Shope, S. M. (2012). Dynamical analysis in real time: Detecting perturbations to team communication. Ergonomics, 55(8), 825–839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.679317 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Guastello, S. J. (2013). Chaos, catastrophe, and human affairs: Applications of nonlinear dynamics to work, organizations, and social evolution. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guastello, S. J. (2016). Physiological synchronization in a vigilance dual task. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 20(1), 49–80.Google Scholar

Guastello, S. J., Marra, D. E., Perna, C., Castro, J., Gomez, M., & Peressini, A. F. (2016). Physiological synchronization in emergency response teams: Subjective workload, drivers and empaths. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 20(2), 223–270.Google Scholar PubMed

Guastello, S. J., & Peressini, A. F. (2017). Development of a synchronization coefficient for biosocial interactions in groups and teams. Small Group Research, 48(1), 3–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496416675225 CrossRef Google Scholar

Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26(4), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496495264003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Hackman, J. R. (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 905–922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.226 CrossRef Google Scholar

Halberstadt, J., Jackson, J. C., Bilkey, D., Jong, J., Whitehouse, H., McNaughton, C., & Zollmann, S. (2016). Incipient social groups: An analysis via in-vivo behavioral tracking. PloS ONE, 11(3), e0149880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149880 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrison, D. A., Mohammed, S., McGrath, J. E., Florey, A. T., & Vanderstoep, S. W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 633–669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00753.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.904140 CrossRef Google Scholar

Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Isella, L., Romano, M., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Colizza, V., Van den Broeck, W., … Tozzi, A. E. (2011). Close encounters in a pediatric ward: Measuring face-to-face proximity and mixing patterns with wearable sensors. PloS ONE, 6(2), e17144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017144 CrossRef Google Scholar

Knight, A. P., Kennedy, D. M., & McComb, S. A. (2016). Using recurrence analysis to examine group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20 (3), 223–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000046 CrossRef Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041386614533586 CrossRef Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., Chang, C. H., & Fernandez, R. (2015). Team dynamics: Using ‘‘big data’’ to advance the science of team effectiveness. Big data at work: The data science revolution and organizational psychology. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 581–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428113493119 CrossRef Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Lazega, E., & Snijders, T. A. B. (Eds.). (2015). Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences: Theory, methods and applications (Vol. 12). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Leenders, R. T. A., Contractor, N. S., & DeChurch, L. A. (2016). Once upon a time: Understanding team processes as relational event networks. Organizational Psychology Review, 6(1), 92–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041386615578312 CrossRef Google Scholar

LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta‐analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 587–597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.587 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259182 CrossRef Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Mehl, R. M. & Conner, T. S. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612441215 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mosier, K. L., & Chidester, T. R. (1991). Situation assessment and situation awareness in a team setting. In Queinnec, Y. and Daniellou, F. (Eds.), Designing for Everyone (pp. 798–800). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Moya‐Albiol, L., Andrés‐García, D., Sanchis‐Calatayud, M. V., Sariñana‐González, P., Ruiz‐Robledillo, N., Romero‐Martínez, Á., & González‐Bono, E. (2013). Psychophysiological responses to cooperation: The role of outcome and gender. International Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 542–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.666552 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology (Vol. 647). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Olguín Olguín, D., Waber, B. N., Kim, T., Mohan, A., Ara, K., & Pentland, A. (2009). Sensible organizations: Technology and methodology for automatically measuring organizational behavior. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 39(1), 43–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2006638 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Onnela, J. P., Waber, B. N., Pentland, A., Schnorf, S., & Lazer, D. (2014). Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns. Scientific Reports, 4, 5604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05604 Google Scholar

Orlitzky, M., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). To err is human, to correct for it divine: A meta-analysis of research testing the functional theory of group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 32(3), 313–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200303 CrossRef Google Scholar

Palumbo, R. V., Marraccini, M. E., Weyandt, L. L., Wilder-Smith, O., McGee, H. A., Liu, S., & Goodwin, M. S. (2017). Interpersonal autonomic physiology: A systematic review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 99–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868316628405 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pentland, A., & Heibeck, T. (2010). Honest signals: How they shape our world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Robins, G., Snijders, T. A. B., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P. (2007). Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 192–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosen, M. A., Dietz, A., Yang, T., Priebe, C. E., & Pronovost, P. J. (2015). An integrative framework for sensor-based measurement of teamwork in healthcare. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(1), 11–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002606 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rosen, M. A., Schiebel, N., Salas, E., Wu, T., Silvestri, S., & King, H. (2012). How can team performance be measured, assessed, and diagnosed? In Salas, E. & Frush, K. (Eds.), Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training (pp. 59–79). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Swezey, R. W. & Salas, E. (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3–29). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar

Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schmid Mast, M., Gatica-Perez, D., Frauendorfer, D., Nguyen, L., & Choudhury, T. (2015). Social sensing for psychology: Automated interpersonal behavior assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 154–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721414560811 CrossRef Google Scholar

Schuller, B., & Batliner, A. (2013). Computational paralinguistics: Emotion, affect and personality in speech and language processing. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39(3), 303–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496408317794 CrossRef Google Scholar

Stevens, R. H., Galloway, T., & Berka, C. (2007). EEG-related changes in cognitive workload, engagement and distraction as students acquire problem solving skills. In Conati, C., McCoy, K. & Paliouras, G. (Eds.), User modeling 2007. UM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4511. Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73078-1_22 Google Scholar

Stevens, R. H., Galloway, T. L., Wang, P., & Berka, C. (2012). Cognitive neurophysiological synchronies: What can they contribute to the study of teamwork? Human Factors, 54(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811427296 CrossRef Google Scholar

Stevens, R., Gorman, J. C., Amazeen, P., Likens, A., & Galloway, T. (2013). The organizational neurodynamics of teams. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 17(1), 67–86.Google Scholar PubMed

Strang, A. J., Funke, G. J., Russell, S. M., Dukes, A. W., & Middendorf, M. S. (2014). Physio-behavioral coupling in a cooperative team task: Contributors and relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 145–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033125 Google Scholar

Tesluk, P., Mathieu, J. E., Zaccaro, S. J., & Marks, M. (1997). Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In Brannick, M. T., Salas, E., & Prince, C. W. (Eds.). Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 197–224). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Tschan, F. (2002). Ideal cycles of communication (or cognitions) in triads, dyads, and individuals. Small Group Research, 33(6), 615–643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496402238618 CrossRef Google Scholar

Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., & Bourlard, H. (2009). Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain. Image and Vision Computing, 27(12), 1743–1759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2008.11.007 CrossRef Google Scholar

Walker, A. D., Muth, E. R., Switzer, F. S., & Rosopa, P. J. (2013). Predicting team performance in a dynamic environment: A team psychophysiological approach to measuring cognitive readiness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 7(1), 69–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1555343412444733 CrossRef Google Scholar

Wild, J. (2017, February 28). Wearables in the workplace and the dangers of staff surveillance. Financial Times. Retrieved February 16, 2018, from https://www.ft.com/content/089c0d00-d739-11e6-944b-e7eb37a6aa8e Google Scholar

Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J. C., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p052 CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

Part II - Application Areas of Interaction Analysis

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive