Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:34:50.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Tone Accent in North and West Germanic

from Part I - Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2020

By
Björn Köhnlein
Edited by
Michael T. Putnam  and
B. Richard Page
Michael T. Putnam
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
B. Richard Page
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

This chapter discusses tonal accent in North and West Germanic. Varieties with tonal accent display (primarily) tone-based oppositions between two accents in stressed syllables, commonly referred to as Accent 1 and Accent 2. In North Germanic, tonal accent occurs in most varieties of Norwegian and Swedish, as well as some in varieties of Danish; in West Germanic, it can be found in dialects spoken in Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands. Examples are [man1] ‘basket’ vs. [man2] ‘man’ for West Germanic (Arzbach), or [1andən] ‘the duck’ [2andən] ‘the spirit’ for North Germanic (Stockholm). For each of the two areas, this chapter reviews some basic synchronic properties of the respective tone accent systems, including patterns of variation across dialects. It furthermore provides a brief overview of the tenets of different synchronic analyses of the phenomena, as well as of diachronic approaches to the genesis and diachronic typology of tonal accent.

Keywords

tone accentfoot structurelexical tonestressdiachronic typologysynchronic typologylexical distributionfocusintonation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics , pp. 143 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, A. 1921. “Die Schärfung in der moselfränkischen Mundart von Arzbach (Unterwesterwaldkreis),” Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 45: 266–290.Google Scholar
Basbøll, H. 2005. The phonology of Danish. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. 2017. “The History of the Franconian Tone Contrast.” In Kehrein et al. (eds.): 27–98.Google Scholar
Botma, B. and Noske, R. (eds.) 2012. Phonological Explorations: Empirical, Theoretical and Diachronic Issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bruce, G. 1973 “Tonal accent rules for compound stressed words in the Malmö dialect,” Working papers 7: 1–35. Lund: Phonetics laboratory, Lund University.Google Scholar
Bruce, G. 1977. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Bye, P. 2004. Evolutionary Typology and Scandinavian Pitch Accent. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Cajot, J. 2006. “Phonologisch bedingter Polytonieverlust – eine tonlose Enklave südlich von Maastricht.” In de Vaan (ed.): 11–24.Google Scholar
d’Alquen, R. and Brown, K. 1992. “The origin of Scandinavian accents I and II.” In Rauch, I., Carr, G. F., and Kyes, R. L. (eds.), On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 61–79.Google Scholar
de Vaan, M. (ed.) 2006. Germanic Tone Accents. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Franconian Tone Accents, Leiden, June 13–14, 2003. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik – Beiheft 131. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
de Vaan, M. 1999. “Towards an explanation of the Franconian tone accents,” Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 51: 3–44.Google Scholar
Dols, W. 1953. Sittardse diftongering. Sittard.Google Scholar
Ejskjær, I. 2005. “Dialects and regional linguistic varieties in the 20th century, Vol. III: Denmark.” In Bandle, O., Braunmüller, K., Jahr, E., Karker, A., Naumann, H-P., Telemann, U., Elmevik, L., and Widmark, G. (eds.), The Nordic Languages. An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, Vol. 2. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 1721–1741.Google Scholar
Gårding, E. 1977. The Scandinavian Word Accents. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N., Vazquez-Larruscain, M., and Basbøll, H., 2013. “Danish stød: Laryngealization or tone,” Phonetica 70.1–2: 66–92.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. 2000. “The lexical tone contrast of Roermond Dutch in Optimality Theory.” In Horne, M. (ed.), Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Amsterdam: Kluwer: 129–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. 2012. “Quantity or durational enhancement of tone: the case of Maastricht Limburgian high vowels.” In B. Botma and R. Noske (eds.): 241–254.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. 2013. “From Cologne to Arzbach: An account of the Franconian ‘tone reversal’.” In Asu, E-L. and Lippus, P. (eds.), Nordic Prosody. Proceedings of the XIth Conference, Tartu 2012. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag: 11–24.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. 2018. “In defense of a dialect-contact account of the Central Franconian tonogenesis.” In Kubozono, H. and Giriko, M. (eds.), Tonal Change and Neutralization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 350–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. and Peters, J. (2004). “A tonal analysis of Cologne Schärfung,” Phonology 21.2: 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. ‘t 1998. “Intonation in Dutch.” In D. Hirst and A. Di Cristo (eds.): 96–111.Google Scholar
Haukur, Þ. 2013. Hljóðkerfi og bragkerfi. Doctoral dissertation, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, B. 2012. “The phonological representation of the Limburgian tonal accents.” In B. Botma and R. Noske (eds.): 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höder, S. 2014. “Low German: A profile of a word language.” In Reina, J. C. and Szczepaniak, R. (eds.), Syllable and Word Languages. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 305–326.Google Scholar
Hognestad, J. K. 2007. “Tonelag i Flekkefjord bymål,” Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift 25.1: 57–88.Google Scholar
Hognestad, J. K. 2012. Tonelagsvariasjon i norsk. Ph.D. thesis. Kristiansand, University of Agder.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. 1976. “Phonologization.” In Juilland, A. (ed.), Linguistic Studies Presented to Joseph H. Greenberg. Saratoga: Anma Libri: 407–418.Google Scholar
Iosad, P. 2016a. “Prosodic structure and suprasegmental features: Short-vowel stød in Danish,” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19.3: 221–268.Google Scholar
Iosad, P. 2016b. “Tonal stability and tonogenesis in North Germanic.” In Giles, I., Chapot, L., Cooijmans, C., Foster, R., and Tesio, B. (eds.), Beyond Borealism: New perspectives on the North. London: Norvik Press: 80–98.Google Scholar
Itô, J. and Mester, A. 2015. “The perfect prosodic word in Danish,” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38.1: 5–36.Google Scholar
Jongen, R. 1972. Phonologie der Moresneter Mundart; Eine Beschreibung der Phonologie der Moresneter Mundart. Eine Beschreibung der segmentalen und prosodischen Wortformdiakrise. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Kehrein, W. 2017. “There’s no tone in Cologne: Against tone segment interactions in Franconian.” In Kehrein et al. (eds.): 147–195.Google Scholar
Kehrein, W, Köhnlein, B., Boersma, P., and van Oostendorp, M. (eds.) 2017. Segmental Structure and Tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kingston, J. 2011. “Tonogenesis.” In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E., and Keren, K. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell: 2304–2333.Google Scholar
Kock, A. 1901. Die alt- und neuschwedische Accentuierung. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. 2011. Rule Reversal Revisited: Synchrony and Diachrony of Tone and Prosodic Structure in the Franconian Dialect of Arzbach. Utrecht: LOT. Dissertation Series 274.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. 2013. “Optimizing the relation between tone and prominence: Evidence from Franconian, Scandinavian, and Serbo-Croatian tone accent systems,” Lingua 131: 1–28.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. 2015a. “An asymmetry in the interaction of pitch and duration,” Diachronica 32.2: 231–267.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. 2015b. “A tonal semi-reversal in Franconian dialects: Rule A vs. Rule B,” North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 68.1: 81–112.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. 2016. “Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone-accent dialects,” Phonology 33.1: 87–123.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. 2017. “Synchronic alternations between monophthongs and diphthongs in Franconian: a metrical approach.” In Kehrein et al. (eds.): 211–236.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, G. 2000. The Phonology of Norwegian. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristoffersen, G. 2006. “Markedness in Urban East Norwegian tonal accent,” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29.1: 95–135.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, G. 2010. Fra jamvekt til etterleddstrykk og tonelag 3: Kvantitetsomleggingen in Ovansiljan. Maal og Minne 2010.2: 1–5.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A., Wetterlin, A., and Jönsson-Steiner, E. 2005a. “Lexical specification of tone in North Germanic,” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 61–96.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. S. 1982. Germanic Accentology. Vol. 1: The Scandinavian Languages. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. 1937. Die Intonation im Schwedischen I: Die Sveamundarten. Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. 1954. Die Intonation im Schwedischen II: Die Norrländischen Mundarten. Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Morén-Duolljá, B. 2013. “The prosody of Swedish underived nouns: No lexical tones required,” Nordlyd 40.1: 196–248.Google Scholar
Myrberg, S. and Riad, T. 2015. “The prosodic hierarchy of Swedish,” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38.2: 115–147.Google Scholar
Myrvoll, K. J. and Trygve, S. 2010. “Tonelagsskilnad i islendsk i Tridje grammatiske avhandling,” Maal og Minne 2010.1: 68–97.Google Scholar
Nörrenberg, K. 1884. “Ein niederrheinisches Accentgesetz,” Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 9: 402–412.Google Scholar
Oftedal, M. 1952. “On the origin of the Scandinavian tone distinction,” Norsk tidsskrift for sprogvidenskap 16: 201–225.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, M. van 2005. “Expressing inflection tonally,” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4.1: 107–127.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, M. van 2017. “Tone, Final Devoicing and Assimilation in Moresnet.” In Kehrein et al. (eds.): 237–252.Google Scholar
Peters, J. 2008. “Tone and intonation in the dialect of Hasselt,” Linguistics 46: 983–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prehn, M. 2012. Vowel Quantity and the fortis-lenis Distinction in North Low Saxon. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation series.Google Scholar
Riad, T. 1998. “The origin of Scandinavian tone accents,” Diachronica 15.1: 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riad, T. 2000. “The origin of Danish stød.” In Lahiri, A. (ed.), Analogy, Levelling, Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 261–300.Google Scholar
Riad, T. 2013. The phonology of Swedish. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ringgaard, K. 1960. Vestjysk stød. Aarhus: Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. E. 1986. Die Mittelfränkischen Tonakzente (Rheinische Akzentuierung). Mainzer Studien zur Sprach- und Volksforschung 8. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. E. 2002. “Die sprachhistorische Genese der mittelfränkischen Tonakzente.” In Auer, P., Gilles, P., and Spiekermann, H., (eds.), Silbenschnitt und Tonakzente, Linguistische Arbeiten 463. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag: 201–233.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. E. and Künzel, H. J. 2006. “Das Rätsel löst sich: Phonetik und sprachhistorische Genese der Tonakzente im Regelumkehrgebiet (Regel B).” In de Vaan (ed.): 135–163.Google Scholar
Smith, N. and Leyden, K. van 2007. “The unusual outcome of a level-stress situation: The case of Wursten Frisian,” NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 52.1: 31–66.Google Scholar
Versloot, A. P. 2008. Mechanisms of Language Change: Vowel Reduction in 15th Century West Frisian. Doctoral Dissertation, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Werth, A., 2011. “Perzeptionsphonologische Grundlagen der Prosodie Eine Analyse der mittelfränkischen Tonakzentdistinktion,” Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 143. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Wetterlin, A., and Lahiri, A. 2015. The diachronic development of stød and tonal accent in North Germanic. In: Haug, D.T.T. (ed.), Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International conference on historical linguistics (pp. 53–67). Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, P. 1970. Phonetisch-phonologische Untersuchungen zur Vokalentwicklung in den deutschen Dialekten. Bd. 1: Die Langvokale im Hochdeutschen. Bd. 2: Die Diphthonge im Hochdeutschen. Studia Linguistica Germanica. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×