from Part III - Temporal and aspectual ontology and other semantic structures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2016
Introduction
Vagueness is an ultimate challenge. An enormous diversity of literature on the topic has accumulated over the years, with no hint of a consensus emerging. In light of this, Section 14.2 presents the main aspects of the challenge vagueness poses, focusing on the category of adjectives, and then gives some brief illustrations of the pervasive manifestations of vagueness in grammar.
Section 14.3 deals with the Sorites paradox, which for many philosophers is the hallmark of vagueness. The efforts to solve the Sorites paradox have uncovered a range of important connections between vagueness and other aspects of language and thought. Linguists traditionally leave it to the philosophers to deal with the Sorites and put their own efforts into dealing with other correlates of vagueness in natural language and their consequences for grammar.
Section 14.4 reviews some of these additional phenomena, centering around three issues: (i) the controversial connections between vagueness and morphological gradability, (ii) the similarity and differences between the phenomena of vagueness and imprecision, and (iii) the ways in which vagueness infiltrates various grammatical constructions we find in language, with consequences for the architecture of grammar. The aim of this section is to highlight the main questions which any theory of vagueness will ultimately have to address.
Indications of vagueness
Almost all of the literature on vagueness focuses on the vagueness of predicates. Moreover, much of the literature on vague predicates has concentrated on adjectives. For much of this chapter we follow the tradition in both these respects.
Vagueness in adjectives
Relative adjectives, such as tall, short, big, small, clever, and obtuse, have long since been prominent examples of vagueness, as opposed to sharp adjectives like prime or even, which exemplify what it is for an adjective not to be vague. A third type of absolute adjectives, such as clean, dirty, straight, and bent, suggests that presence or absence of the features indicative of vagueness may not be a black or white matter (see Section 14.4 for more on this point). The present section explains this classification. Positive forms of relative adjectives, as in Danny is tall or The pencil is big, exhibit a bundle of features indicative of vagueness, as follows.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.