Assessment

doi:10.1017/9781108848916.021

Part III - Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2021

Edited by

Jennifer M. Brown and

Miranda A. H. Horvath

Show author details

Jennifer M. Brown: Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Miranda A. H. Horvath: Affiliation:
University of Suffolk

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology , pp. 337 - 490

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108848916.021 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alison, L., Power, N., Heuvel, C., Humann, M., Palasinksi, M., & Crego, J. (2015). Decision inertia: Deciding between least worst outcomes in emergency responses to disasters. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(2), 295–321.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A., (2007). Motivational bias in criminal investigators’ judgments of witness reliability. Applied Social Psychology, 37, 561–591.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. (1992). Videotaping of police interviews with suspects – An evaluation (Police Research Series Paper No. 1). Home Office.Google Scholar

Boon, R., Milne, R., Rosloot, E., & Heinsbroek, J. (2020). Demonstrating detail in investigative interviews: An examination of the DeMo technique. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3700 Google Scholar

Bull, R., & Milne, R. (2004). Attempts to improve the police interviewing of Suspects. In Lassiter, D. (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 181–196). Kluwer Academic.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burrows, K., Powell, M., & Benson, M. (2015). A guide to clarifying evidence in Australian child forensic interviews. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 18, 91–103.Google Scholar

Christianson, S. A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284–309.Google Scholar

Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). National Evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course (Police Research Award Scheme No. PRAS/149). Home Office.Google Scholar

Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2016). Interviewing suspects in England and Wales: A National Evaluation of PEACE interviewing: One decade later. In Walsh, D., Oxburgh, G., Redlich, A., & Mykleburst, T. (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: Vol. 2. Suspects (pp. 101–108). Routledge.Google Scholar

Cohen-Hatton, S. R., Butler, P. C., & Honey, R. C. (2015). An investigation of operational decision making in situ. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(5), 793–804.Google Scholar

Dalton, G., & Milne, R. (2020). Interviewing witnesses and victims of crime. In Marques, P. & Paulino, M. (Eds.), Police psychology: New trends in forensic psychological science. Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, G., Milne, R., Hope, L., Vernham, Z., & Nunan, J. (2021). “He was just your typical average guy”: Examining how person descriptions are elicited by frontline police officers. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3778 Google Scholar

Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don’t. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795.Google Scholar

Fahsing, I., & Ask, K. (2015). The making of an expert detective: The role of experience in English and Norwegian police officers’ investigative decision-making. Psychology, Crime and Law, 22, 203–223.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K. (2019). A missed opportunity to improve on credibility analysis in criminal law. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), My biggest research mistake (pp. 201–203). Sage.Google Scholar

Fisher, R., & Geiselman, R. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Thomas.Google Scholar

Frenda, S. J., Nichols, R. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 20–23.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2005). Will it all end in tiers: Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In Williamson, T. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing Rights, research, regulation (pp. 167–189). Willan.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2018, Eds.). The psychology of criminal investigation; From theory to practice. Routledge.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A., Milne, B., & Cherryman, J. (2011). Question of control? The formulation of suspect and witness interview question strategies by advanced interviewers. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 13, 255.Google Scholar

Grubin, D. (2008). The case for polygraph testing of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(2), 177–189.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Wiley.Google Scholar

Heaton-Armstrong, A., & Wolchover, D. (1999). The recording of witness statements. In Heaton-Armstrong, A., Shepherd, E., & Wolchover, D. (Eds.), Analysing witness testimony. Blackstone Press.Google Scholar

Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S.-A. (2002). Murders’ and sex offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 20, 31–45.Google Scholar

Jores, T., Colloff, M., Kloft, L., Smailes, H., & Flowe, H. (2019). A meta-analysis of acute alcohol intoxication on witness recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 324–343.Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–330.Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1999). Face value? Factors that influence eyewitness accuracy. Home Office.Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., Wagstaff, G. F., & Covey, J. A. (1996). The influence of item difficulty on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 653–662.Google Scholar

Kontogianni, F., Hope, L., Taylor, P. J., Vrij, A., & Gabbert, F. (2018). The benefits of a self-generated cue mnemonic for timeline interviewing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 454–461.Google Scholar

Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G. L., & Rumpel, C. (1981). Can people detect eyewitness identification accuracy within and across situations? Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79–89.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560–572.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1979). The malleability of human memory: Information introduced after we view an incident can transform memory. American Scientist, 67(3), 312–320.Google Scholar

Luus, E. C. A., & Wells, G. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714–723.Google Scholar

MacDonald, S., Snook, B., & Milne, R. (2017). Witness interview training: A field evaluation. Journal of Police and Criminological Psychology, 32, 77–84.Google Scholar

McLean, M. (1995). Quality investigation? Police interviewing of witnesses. Medicine, Science and the Law, 35, 116–122.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Wiley.Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2003). Interviewing by the police. In Carson, D. & Bull, R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 111–125). Wiley.Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2006). Interviewing victims of crime, including children and people with intellectual difficulties. In Kebbell, M. R. & Davies, G. M. (Eds.), Practical psychology for forensic investigations (pp. 7–23). Wiley.Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2016). Witness interviews and crime investigation. In Groome, D. & Eysenck, M. W. (Eds.), An introduction to applied cognitive psychology. Routledge.Google Scholar

Milne, R., Griffiths, A., Clarke, C., & Dando, C. (2019). The Cognitive Interview – a tiered approach in the real world. In Schwartz, B., Dickenson, J., Schreiber Compo, N., & McCauley, M. (Eds.), Evidence-based investigative interviewing (pp. 56–73). Routledge.Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Shaw, G. (1999). Obtaining witness statements: Best practice and proposals for innovation. Medicine, Science and the Law, 39, 127–138.Google Scholar

Milne, R., Shaw, G., & Bull, R. (2007). Investigative interviewing: The role of psychology. In Carson, D., Milne, R., Pakes, F., & Shalev, K. (Eds.), Applying psychology to criminal justice (pp. 65–80). Wiley.Google Scholar

Milne, R., Shawyer, A., Dalton, G., May, B., Nunan, J., & Bull, R. (2020). Interviewing adults: Communication at the frontline. In Shapiro, L. R. & Maras, M.-H. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of security and emergency management. Springer.Google Scholar

Nunan, J., Milne, R., Shawyer, A., Wakefield, A., Dalton, G., Abbot, R., & Cowup, P. (2016). Don’t break the chain: from effective communication to successful decision-making. Emergency Services Times, 17(6), 50–52.Google Scholar

O’Neill, M., & Milne, B. (2014). Success within criminal investigations: is communication still a key component? In Bull, R. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 123–146). Springer.Google Scholar

Ord, B., & Shaw, G. (1999). Investigative interviewing explained. New Police Bookshop.Google Scholar

Parker, A. D., & Brown, J. (2000). Detection of deception: Statement Validity Analysis as a means of determining truthfulness or falsity of rape allegations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5(2), 237–259.Google Scholar

Plimmer, J. (1997, February 7). Confession rate. Police Review, pp. 16–18.Google Scholar

Powell, M., & Snow, P. C. (2013). A guide to questioning children during the free-narrative phase of an interview about abuse. Australian Psychologist, 42, 57–65.Google Scholar

Poyser, S., Nurse, A., & Milne, R. (2018). Miscarriages of justice. Policy Press.Google Scholar

Risan, P., Binder, P.-E., & Milne, R. (2016). Regulating and coping with distress during police interviews of traumatized victims. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 8(6), 736–744.Google Scholar

Risan, P., Binder, P.-E., & Milne, R. (2017). Establishing and maintaining rapport in investigative interviews of traumatized victims: A qualitative study. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 12(2), 372–387.Google Scholar

Risan, P., Milne, R., & Binder, P.-E. (2020). Trauma narratives: Recommendations for investigative interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(4), 678–694.CrossRef Google Scholar

Savage, S., & Milne, R. (2007). Miscarriages of justice – the role of the investigative process. In Newburn, T., Williamson, T., & Wright, A. (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation. Willan.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E. (1993). Resistance in interviews: The contribution of police perception and behaviour. In Shepherd, E. (Ed.), Aspects of police interviewing (pp. 5–12). The British Psychological Society.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E., & Milne, R. (1999). Full and faithful: Ensuring quality practice and integrity of outcome in witness interviews. In Heaton-Armstrong, A., Wolchover, D., & Shepherd, E. (Eds.), Analysing witness testimony (pp. 124–145). Blackstone Press.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E., & Milne, R. (2006). Have you told the management about this? Bringing witness interviewing into the 21st century. In A. Heaton-Armstrong, Shepherd, E., Gudjonsson, G., & Wolchover, D. (Eds.), Witness testimony: Psychological, investigative, and evidential perspectives (pp. 131–151). Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, K., & Milne, B. (2018). Witness interview strategy for critical incidents (WISCI). Journal of Forensic Practice, 20(4), 268–278.Google Scholar

Stockdale, J. E. (1993). Management and supervision of police interviews. Home Office Police Research Group.Google Scholar

Vanderhallen, M., Jaspaert, E., & Vervaeke, G. (2016). SCAN as an investigative tool. Police Practice and Research, 17(3), 279–293.Google Scholar

Vrij, A. (2006). Detecting deception. In Kebbell, M. R. & Davies, G. M. (Eds.), Practical psychology for forensic investigations and prosecutions (pp. 89–102). Wiley.Google Scholar

Walsh, D., King, M., & Griffiths, A. (2017). Evaluating interviews which search for the truth with suspects: But are investigators self-assessments of their own skills truthful ones? Psychology, Crime and Law, 23, 647–665.Google Scholar

Westera, N. J., Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (2011). Interviewing rape complainants: Police officers’ perceptions of interview format and quality of evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 917–926.CrossRef Google Scholar

Westera, N. J., Kebbell, M. R., Milne, R., & Green, T. (2016). Towards a more effective detective. Policing and Society, 26, 1–17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Westera, N. J., Powell, M., Milne, R., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2019). Police organizational responses to interviewing victims of sexual offences. In Bull, R. & Blandon-Gitlin, I. (Eds.), Handbook of legal and investigative psychology (pp. 182–196). Routledge.Google Scholar

Wilson, C., & Powell, M. (2001). A guide to interviewing children. Essential skills for counsellors, police, lawyers and social workers. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

References

Ackerman, R., & Koriat, A. (2011). Response latency as a predictor of the accuracy of children’s reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 406–417.Google Scholar

American National Academy of Sciences. (2009). Committee on identifying the needs of the forensic sciences community & national research council. Author.Google Scholar

Amsterdam Laboratory for Legal Psychology. (2020). Eyewitness memory in cross-cultural contexts. https://allp.nl/cases/eyewitness-memory-in-cross-cultural-contexts/Google Scholar

Anakwah, N., Horselenberg, H., Hope, L., Amankwah-Poku, M., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2020). Cross-cultural differences in eyewitness memory reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(2), 504–515.Google Scholar

Benton, T. R., Ross, D. F., Bradshaw, E., Thomas, W. N., & Bradshaw, G. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 115–129.Google Scholar

Brewer, N., Caon, A., Todd, C., & Weber, N. (2006). Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency. Law and Human Behavior, 30(1), 31–50.Google Scholar

Brewer, N., Potter, R., Fisher, R. P., Bond, N., & Luszcz, M. A. (1999). Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 297–313.Google Scholar

Dando, C. J., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2008). Victims and witnesses of crime: Police officers’ perceptions of interviewing practices. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 59–70.Google Scholar

De Poot, C. J., Bokhorst, R. J., Van Koppen, P. J., & Muller, E. R. (2004). Recherche portret: Over dilemma’s in de opsporing. Kluwer.Google Scholar

Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687–706.Google Scholar

Dubelaar, M. J. (2014). Betrouwbaar getuigenbewijs: Totstandkoming en waardeing van strafrechtelijke getuigenverklaringen in perspectief (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Evans, J. R., Schreiber Compo, N., & Russano, M. B. (2009). Intoxicated witnesses and suspects: Procedures and prevalence according to law enforcement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(3), 194–221.Google Scholar

Fawcett, J. M., Russell, E. J., Peace, K. A., & Christie, J. (2013). Of guns and geese: A meta-analytic review of the ‘weapon focus’ literature. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(1), 35–66.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. In Davis, G., Lloyd-Bostock, S., McMurran, M., & Wilson, C. (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 21–28). De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. P., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Psychological Science, 20(1), 16–19.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2018). Suggestibility in the courtroom. In Otgaar, H. & Howe, M. L. (Eds.), Finding the truth in the courtroom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Confrey, M. (2018). Witness testimony. In Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (Eds.), The psychology of criminal investigation: From theory to practice. Routledge.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 298–307.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading post-event information with the Self-Administered Interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 568–575.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 533–543.Google Scholar

Garrett, B. L. (2008). Judging innocence. Columbia Law Review, 108(1), 55–142.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2018). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. Norton.Google Scholar

Gilbert, J. A. E., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(6), 723–739.Google Scholar

Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2005). Eyewitness testimony: Tracing the beliefs of Swedish legal professionals. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(5), 709–727.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A., & Rachlew, A. (2018). From interrogation to investigative interviewing: The application of psychology. In Griffiths, A. & Milne, R. (Eds.), The psychology of criminal investigation. From theory to practice. (pp. 154–178). Routledge.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, P. U., Lindholm, T., & Jönsson, F. U. (2019). Predicting accuracy in eyewitness testimonies with memory retrieval effort and confidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00703 Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.Google Scholar

Hewitt, M. (2001). Nine force attrition study. Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.Google Scholar

Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Fisher, R. J., & Jamieson, K. (2014). Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: The impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 304–313.Google Scholar

Houston, K. A., Hope, L., Memon, A., & Read, J. D. (2013). Expert testimony on eyewitness evidence: In search of common sense. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(5), 637–651.Google Scholar

Innocence Project. (2017). DNA exonerations in the United States. https://innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/Google Scholar

Innocence Project. (2019). www.innocenceproject.org/Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61(8), 760–771.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52.Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–330.Google Scholar

Lindholm, T., Jönsson, F. U., & Liuzza, M. T. (2018). Retrieval effort cues predict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(4), 534–542.Google Scholar

Lindsay, R. C., Semmler, C., Weber, N., Brewer, N., & Lindsay, M. R. (2008). How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 32(6), 526–535.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1996). Eyewitness testimony. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F., Coan, J., & Pickrell, J. E. (1996). Lost in a shopping mall: An experience with controversial research. Ethics & Behavior, 7(3), 271–284.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, R. (1987). Some facts about ‘weapon focus’. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 55–62.Google Scholar

MacLin, O. H., MacLin, M. K., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Race, arousal, attention, exposure and delay: An examination of factors moderating face recognition. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7(1), 134–152.Google Scholar

Mapes, A., De Poot, C. J., & Kloosterman, A. (2014). De rol van DNA bij het vinden van een dader. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 56(3), 29–46.Google Scholar

Mapes, A., Kloosterman, A. D., & De Poot, C. J. (2015). DNA in the criminal justice system: The DNA succes story in perspective. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60(4), 851–856.Google Scholar

McNally, R. J. (2003). Recovering memories of trauma: A view from the laboratory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 32–35.Google Scholar

Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & Le Doux, J. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406, 722–726.Google Scholar

Netherlands Register of Court Experts. (2020). Standards Legal Psychology (009.0) (Version 2.0). www.nrgd.nl/binaries/Standards%20Legal%20Psychology%202.0%20def_tcm39–421076.pdf Google Scholar

O’Brien, M., & Kebbell, M. (2014). Interview techniques in International Criminal Court and Tribunals. In Bull, R. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 91–101). Springer.Google Scholar

Odinot, G. (2008). Eyewitness confidence: The relation between accuracy and confidence in episodic memory (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., Boon, B., & Wolters, L. (2015). Het episodisch geheugen en getuigenverhoor. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 57(3), 279–299.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., Memon, A., La Rooy, D., & Millen, A. (2013). Are two interviews better than one? Eyewitness memory across repeated cognitive interviews. PLoS One, 8(10), e76305.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., & Wolters, G. (2006). Repeated recall, retention interval and the accuracy-confidence relation in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(7), 973–985.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., Wolters, G., & Van Giezen, A. (2012). Accuracy, confidence and consistency in repeated recall of events. Psychology, Crime and Law, 19(7), 1–14.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., Wolters, G., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2009). Eyewitness memory of a supermarket robbery: A case study of accuracy and confidence after 3 months. Law and Human Behavior, 33(6), 506–514.Google Scholar

Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12(2), 181–191.Google Scholar

Penrod, S. D., Loftus, E. F., & Winkler, J. (1982). The reliability of eyewitness testimony: A psychological perspective. In Kerr, N. L. & Bray, R. M. (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 119–168). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Powell, M. B., & Bartholomew, T. (2003). Interviewing and assessing clients from different cultural backgrounds: Guidelines for all forensic professionals. In Carson, D. & Bull, R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 625–643). John Wiley.Google Scholar

Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L. (2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67(8), 603–613.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). Memory and law: What can cognitive neuroscience contribute? Nature Neuroscience, 16(2), 119–123.Google Scholar

Smeets, T., Candel, I., & Merckelbach, H. (2004). Accuracy, completeness, and consistency of emotional memories. The American Journal of Psychology, 117(4), 595–610.Google Scholar

Spencer, J. R. (2016). Adversarial vs inquisitorial systems: Is there still such a difference? The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(5), 601–616.Google Scholar

Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14(5), 455–461.Google Scholar

Van Koppen, P. J., & Penrod, S. D. (2003). Adversarial or inquisitorial. In van Koppen, P. J. & Penrod, S. D. (Eds.), Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems (pp. 1–19). Plenum.Google Scholar

Van Oorsouw, K., & Merckelbach, H. (2012). The effects of alcohol on crime‐related memories: A field study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 82–90.Google Scholar

Van Oorsouw, K., Merckelbach, H., & Smeets, T. (2015). Alcohol intoxication impairs memory and increases suggestibility for a mock crime: A field study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(4), 493–501.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Charman, S. D., Den Blanken, A., & Hooydonk, M. (2018). Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(4), 420–428.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Groen, R. N., Ampt, J. E., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2017). When discussion between eyewitnesses helps memory. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(2), 242–259.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Hildebrandt, A., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2016). Acknowledge, repeat, rephrase, elaborate: Witnesses can help each other remember more. Memory, 24(5), 669–682.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Van Deuren, S., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2019). Remembering with a stranger: Comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews. Memory, 27(10), 1390–1403.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2018). Recounting a common experience: On the effectiveness of instructing eyewitness pairs. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–11.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Van Koppen, P. J., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). The inconsistent suspect: A systematic review of consistency in truth tellers and liars. In Bull, R. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 183–207). Springer.Google Scholar

Wagenaar, W. A., & van der Schrier, J. H. (1996). Face recognition as a function of distance and illumination: A practical tool for use in the courtroom. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2(4), 321–332.Google Scholar

Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1546–1557.Google Scholar

Wise, R. A., & Safer, M. A. (2004). What US judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(4), 427–443.Google Scholar

Wise, R. A., Safer, M. A., & Maro, C. M. (2011). What U.S. law enforcement officers know and believe about eyewitness factors, eyewitness interviews and identification procedures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 488–500.Google Scholar

Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2018). Rethinking the reliability of eyewitness memory. Perspectives of Psychological Science, 13(3), 324–335.Google Scholar

Woolnough, P. S., & MacLeod, M. D. (2001). Watching the birdie watching you: Eyewitness memory for actions using CCTV recordings of actual crimes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 395–411.Google Scholar

Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E. M., & Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 174–178.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

Beaver, K. M., Rowland, M. W., Schwartz, J. A., & Nedelec, J. L. (2011). The genetic origins of psychopathic personality traits in adult males and females: Results from an adoption-based study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(5), 426–432.Google Scholar

Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., Stokes, J., Handelsman, L., Medrano, M., Desmond, D., Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 169–190.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R. (2007). Personality disorder and antisocial deviance: Comments on the debate on the structure of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(2), 142–159.Google Scholar

Briere, J. (2010). Trauma Symptom Inventory – 2nd edition (TSI-2) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). Mosby.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J. (1996). Psychopathic personality in different cultures: What do we know? What do we need to find out?. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10(1), 23–40.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J. (2010). Personality disorder and violence: Understand violence risk: An introduction to the special section personality disorder and violence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(5), 539–550.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J. (2016). Violence risk: The actuarial illusion. In D. Farrington & A. Kapardis (Eds.), Psychology, crime, policing and courts. Routledge.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J. (2018). Psychopathic personality disorder: Capturing an elusive concept. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 14(1), 15–32.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2004). Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality–Institutional Rating Scale (CAPP–IRS). Unpublished manual.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2012). Explicating the Construct of Psychopathy: Development and Validation of a Conceptual Model, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(4), 242–252.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Logan, C. (2015). Capturing clinical complexity: Towards a personality-oriented measure of psychopathy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), 262–273.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Logan, C. (2018). Capturing psychopathic personality: Penetrating the mask of sanity through clinical interview. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), The handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1999). Psychopathy across cultures: North America and Scotland Compared. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(1), 55–68.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2010). Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: A challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 258–274.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Reconstructing psychopathy: Clarifying the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 337–357.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. (2005). Assessing psychopathy in the UK: Concerns about cross-cultural generalisability. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(4), 335–341.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., & Skeem, J. L. (2007). Understanding the structure of the Psychopathy Checklist Revised: An exploration of methodological confusion. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(Suppl. 49), 39–50.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Sellbom, M. (2019). An examination of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised latent factor structure via exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 31(5), 581.Google Scholar

DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., Galloway, M., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., Koller, J. P., & Bersoff, B. (2014). Investigating the role of the Psychopathy Checklist?Revised in United States case law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 11.Google Scholar

DeMatteo, D., Hart, S. D., Heilbrun, K., Boccaccini, M. T., Cunningham, M. D., Douglas, K. S., Dvoskin, J. A., Edens, J. F., Guy, L. S., Murrie, D. C., Otto, R. K., Packer, I. K., & Reidy, T. J. (2020). Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(2), 133–144.CrossRef Google Scholar

DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2004). Anger Disorders Scale (ADS): Technical manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk for violence: User guide. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Vincent, G. M., & Edens, J. F. (2018). Risk for criminal recidivism: The role of psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Edens, J. F., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., DeMatteo, D., & Sörman, K. (2015). How reliable are Psychopathy Checklist–Revised scores in Canadian criminal trials? A case law review. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 447.Google Scholar

Edworthy, R., Sampson, S., & Völlm, B. (2016). Inpatient forensic-psychiatric care: Legal frameworks and service provision in three European countries. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 47, 18–27.Google Scholar

Ellingson, J. M., Littlefield, A. K., Verges, A., & Sher, K. J. (2018). Psychopathy and substance abuse disorders. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1993). Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.Google Scholar

Fallon Report. (1999). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Personality Disorder Unit, Ashworth Special Hospital VOLUME 1 His Honour Peter Fallon QC Professor Robert Bluglass CBE Professor Brian Edwards CBE Mr Granville Daniels Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health by Command of Her Majesty, January 1999 Cm 4194-ii.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P., & Bergstrom, H. (2018). Family background and psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 354–379). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Forouzan, E., & Cooke, D. J. (2005). Figuring out la femme fatale: Conceptual and assessment issues concerning psychopathy in females. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(6), 765–778.Google Scholar

Flórez, G., Ferrer, V., García, L. S., Crespo, M. R., Pérez, M., Saiz, P. A., & Cooke, D. J. (2020). Comparison between the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised and the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality in a representative sample of Spanish prison inmates. Plos One, 15(2), e0228384.Google Scholar

Gatner, D. (2019). How much does that cost? Examining the economic costs of crime in North America attributable to people with psychopathic personality disorder (Unpublished dissertation). Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: forensic assessments and instruments (1st ed.). Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1(2), 111–119.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D., Cooke, D. J., & Hart, S. D. (1999). Psychopathy and sadistic personality disorder. In Millon, T., Blaney, P. H., & Davis, R. D. (Eds.), Oxford textbooks in clinical psychology: Vol. 4. Oxford textbook of psychopathology (p. 555–584). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Mokros, A. (2018). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, properties, debates, and new directions. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2006). Treatment of psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D. (1998). Psychopathy and risk for violence. In Cooke, D. J., Forth, A. E. & Hare, R. D. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society (pp. 355–374). Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D. (2001). Forensic issues. In Livesley, W. J. (Ed.), Forensic and clinical issues in the assessment of psychopathy (pp. 555–569). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D. (2016). Culture and violence risk assessment: The case of Ewert v. Canada. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(2), 76.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., & Cook, A. N. (2012). Current issues in the assessment and diagnosis of psychopathy (psychopathic personality disorder). Neuropsychiatry, 2(6), 497–508.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (1st ed.). Multi-Health Systems Inc.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., & Logan, C., (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In Sturmey, P. & McMurran, M. (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. J. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of violence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(S49), s60–s65.Google Scholar

Henderson, D. K. (1939). Psychopathic states. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Karpman, B. (1948). The myth of psychopathic personality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 104(9), 523–534.Google Scholar

Kreis, M. K., & Cooke, D. J. (2011). Capturing the psychopathic female: A prototypicality analysis of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) across gender. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(5), 634–648.Google Scholar

Larsen, R. R., Jalava, J., & Griffiths, S. (2020). Are Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R) psychopaths dangerous, untreatable, and without conscience? A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Psychopathy, Public Policy, and Law, 26(3), 297–311.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological psychiatry, 62(6), 553–564.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in non-criminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(3), 488–524.CrossRef Google Scholar

Logan, C., & Weizmann-Henelius, G. (2012). Psychopathy in women: presentation, assessment, and management. In Psychopathy and law: A practitioner’s guide. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that psychopathy scores in early adolescence predict adult psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(1), 155.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., Miller, D. J., Mullins-Sweatt, S., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 108.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marshall, L. A., & Cooke, D. J. (1999). The childhood experiences of psychopaths: A retrospective study of familial and societal factors. Journal of Personality Disorders, 13(3), 211–225.Google Scholar

Miller, A. K., Rufino, K. A., Boccaccini, M. T., Jackson, R. L., & Murrie, D. C. (2011). On individual differences in person perception: Raters’ personality traits relate to their Psychopathy Checklist-Revised scoring tendencies. Assessment, 18(2), 253–260.Google Scholar

Millon, T. (1981). Disorders of personality. Wiley.Google Scholar

Millon, T. (2011). Classifying personality disorders: An evolution-based alternative to an evidence-based approach. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(3), 279–304.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moreira, D., Moreira, D. S., Oliveira, S., Ribeiro, F. N., Barbosa, F., Fávero, M., & Gomes, V. (2020). Relationship between adverse childhood experiences and psychopathy: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 101452.Google Scholar

Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Guarnera, L. A., & Rufino, K. A. (2013). Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?. Psychological science, 24(10), 1889–1897.Google Scholar

Murphy, J. M. (1976). Psychiatric labelling in cross-cultural perspective: Similar kinds of disturbed behavior appear to be labelled abnormal in diverse cultures. Science, 191(4231), 1019–1028.Google Scholar

Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and psychopathology, 21(3), 913–938.Google Scholar

Polaschek, D. L., & Skeem, J. (2018). Treatment of adults and juveniles with psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Poythress, N., & Petrila, J. P. (2010). PCL-R psychopathy: threats to sue, peer review, and potential implications for science and law. A commentary. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(1), 3–10.Google Scholar

Preszler, J., Marcus, D. K., Edens, J. F., & McDermott, B. E. (2018). Network analysis of psychopathy in forensic patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(2), 171.Google Scholar

Repo-Tiihonen, E., Virkkunen, M., & Tiihonen, J. (2001). Mortality of antisocial male criminals. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 12(3), 677–683.Google Scholar

Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Cormier, C. A. (1992). An evaluation of a maximum-security therapeutic community for psychopaths and other mentally disordered offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 16(4), 399–412.Google Scholar

Schneider, K. (1958). Psychopathic personalities (9th ed.). Cassell.Google Scholar

Salekin, R. T. (2002). Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism: Clinical lore or clinical reality? Clinical Psychology Review, 22(1), 79–112.Google Scholar

Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality Disorders, 69(6), 847–879.Google Scholar

Sellbom, M., & Cooke, D. J. (2019). Manual for the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality – Self-Report (CAPP-SR). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Sellbom, M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Fowler, K. A., & McCrary, K. L. (2018). The self-report assessment of psychopathy: Problems, pitfalls, and promises. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Shariat, S. V., Assadi, S. M., Noroozian, M., Pakravannejad, M., Yahyazadeh, O., Aghayan, S., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. (2010). Psychopathy in Iran: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(5), 676–691.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E. (2019). The Hunt for Non-Barking Dogs and Other Curiosities: Identifying and Managing Anomaly Within Forensic Interviews. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 18(1), 66–84.Google Scholar

Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010a). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 433–445.Google Scholar

Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010b). One measure does not a construct make: Directions toward reinvigorating psychopathy research. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 455–459.Google Scholar

Tolman, A. O., & Mullendore, K. B. (2003). Risk evaluations of the courts: Is service quality a function of specialization. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 225–232.Google Scholar

Tew, J., & Atkinson, R. (2013). The Chromis programme: from conception to evaluation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(5–6), 415–431.Google Scholar

Tew, J., Bennett, A., & Dixon, L. (2020). The Chromis programme: Exploratory research using multiple case studies. London: HM Prison & Probation Service, Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.Google Scholar

Verschuere, B., & te Kaat, L. (2019). What are the core features of psychopathy? A prototypicality analysis using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Journal of Personality Disorders, 1–10.Google Scholar

Verschuere, B., van Ghesel Grothe, S., Waldorp, L., Watts, A. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., & Noordhof, A. (2018). What features of psychopathy might be central? A network analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in three large samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000315 Google Scholar

Viding, E., & Larsson, H. (2010). Genetics of child and adolescent psychopathy. In Salekin, R. T. & Lynam, D. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Child and Adolescent Psychopathy (pp. 113–134). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). https://icd.who.int/Google Scholar

Yang, M., Wong, S., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767.Google Scholar

References

Adshead, G. (2001). Murmurs of discontent: Treatment and treatability of personality disorder. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7(6), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.7.6.407 Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.Google Scholar

Babchishin, K. M., Nunes, K. L., & Hermann, C. A. (2013). The Validity of the implicit association test (IAT) measures of sexual attraction to children: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sex Behaviour, 42(3), 487–99.Google Scholar

Banse, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Clarbour, J. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 319–335.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(7), 813–22.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S, Robinson, J., & Woodbury-Smith, M. (2006). The Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA): A diagnostic method. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 35(6), 807–819.CrossRef Google Scholar

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., Stokes, J., Handelsman, L., Medrano, M., Desmond, D., & Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the childhood trauma questionnaire. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27(2), 169–190.Google Scholar

Birchwood, M., Gilbert, P., Gilbert, J., Trower, P., Meaden, A., Hay, J., Murray, E., & Miles, J. N. V. (2004). Interpersonal and role-related schema influence the relationship with the dominant ‘voice’ in schizophrenia: A comparison of three models. Journal of Psychological Medicine, 34, 1571–1580.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R. (1998). Criminality and the interpersonal circle in mentally disordered offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(2), 155–176.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., Logan, C., Donnelly, J., & Renwick, S. (2003). Personality disorders, psychopathy and other mental disorders: Co-morbidity among patients at English and Scottish high-security hospitals. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 14(1), 111–137.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., Logan, C., Renwick, S., & Donnelly, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of personality disorder: Hierarchical structure and relationships with the five-factor model, the interpersonal circle, and psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(6), 597–623.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., & Renwick, S. J. (1996). Rating scales for measuring the interpersonal circle in forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 8(1), 76–84.Google Scholar

Blom-Cooper, Sir L., Brown, M., Dolan, R., & Murphy, E. (1992). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Complaints about Ashworth Hospital, Cmnd 2028, vols 1 and 2 (Chairman: Sir Louis Blom-Cooper). HMSO.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., Tough, S., & Haaven, J. (2004). Assessment of risk manageability of intellectual disabled sex offenders. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(4), 275–283.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., Wilson, R. J., Gauthier, C. M., & Hart, S. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk – 20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.Google Scholar

Briere, J. (2011). Trauma Symptom Inventory–2 (TSI–2). Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Bruce, T. (2015). The DSM-5 definition of mental disorder: Critique and alternatives. Critical Thinking in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis, 9(64), 45–68.Google Scholar

Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.Google Scholar

Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Cappai, A., Wells, J., Tapp, J., et al. (2017). Substance misuse in personality disorder and schizophrenia: findings and clinical implications from a high secure hospital. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-07–2016–0035 Google Scholar

Chadwick, P., Lees, S., Birchwood, M. (2000). The revised Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R). British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(3), 229–232.Google Scholar

Collins, N. (2020). The use of polygraph test in clinical forensic psychiatry setting. In Igoumenou, A. (Ed.), Ethical issues in clinical forensic psychiatry (pp. 85–96). Springer.Google Scholar

Daffern, M., Jones, L., & Shine, J. (2010). Wiley series in forensic clinical psychology. Offence paralleling behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Davidson, M., Humphreys, M. S., Johnstone, E. C., & Cunningham Owens, D. G. (1995). Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among remand prisoners in Scotland. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 545–548.Google Scholar

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(85). www.sjdm.org/dmidi/Interpersonal_Reactivity_Index.html Google Scholar

Dean, C., & Perkins, D. (2008). Penile plethysmography. Prison Service Journal, 178, 20–25.Google Scholar

de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries, R. (2009). SAPROF: Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk (English version). Forum Educatief.Google Scholar

DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2004). The Anger Disorder Scale: Technical manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., et al. (2013). Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3): Development and Overview. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 93–108.Google Scholar

D’Zurilla, T., Nezu, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2002). Social Problem-Solving Inventory–Revised (SPSI-R): Manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Edworthy, R., Sampson, S., & Vollm, B. (2016). Inpatient forensic-psychiatric care: Legal frameworks and service provision in three European countries. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 47, 18–27.Google Scholar

Eke, A. W., Helmus, L. M., & Seto, M. C. (2019). A Validation Study of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Sexual Abuse, 31(4), 456–476.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1993).?Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R)?[Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05461-000 Google Scholar

First, M. B., & Gibbon, M. (2004). The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID-I) and the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II disorders (SCID-II). In Hilsenroth, M. & Segalaniel, D. L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 2. Personality assessment (pp. 134–143). John Wiley.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H., & Singh, K. K. (1989). The revised Gudjonsson blame attribution inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(1), 67–70.Google Scholar

Hammond, S. M., & O’Rourke, M. M. (2004) Developing a psychometric model of risk. Issues in Forensic Psychology, 5, 100–114.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 97–04). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Mcgrath, R, Kroner, D., et al. (2017). A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results in corrections through the development of a common language. http://saratso.org/pdf/A_Five_Level_Risk_and_Needs_System_Report.pdf Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154 –1163.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Scott, H. (1995). Assessing perspective taking among sexual offenders, nonsexual criminals and non-offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 259–277.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sexual offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behaviour, 24(1), 119–136.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Harper, C. A., Bartels, R. M., & Hogue, T. E. (2016). Reducing stigma and punitive attitudes toward pedophiles through narrative humanization. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(5), 533–555.Google Scholar

Hart, S., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. (2016). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In Craig, L. & Rettenberger, M. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment, treatment of sexual offending (Vol. 2, pp. 643–666). John Wiley.Google Scholar

Hart, S., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R.; with Klaver, J., Logan, C, & Watt, K. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. The Institute Against Family Violence.Google Scholar

Heather, N., & Rollnick, S. (1993). Readiness to Change Questionnaire: User’s manual. University of New South Wales.Google Scholar

Hogue, T., Wesson, C., & Perkins, D. (2016). Eye tracking and assessing sexual interests in forensic contexts. In Boer, D. P. (Ed.), Theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending. John Wiley.Google Scholar

Home Office/Department of Health. (1986). Offenders suffering from a psychopathic disorder: A joint DHSS/HO consultation document. Home Office/Department of Health.Google Scholar

Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (Eds.). (2014). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Jones, L. (2004). Offence paralleling behaviour (OPB) as a framework for assessment and interventions with offenders. In Needs, A. & Towl, G. (Eds.), Applying psychology to forensic practice (pp. 34–63). Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. W., & Eaves, D. (1995). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (2nd ed.). Institute on Family Violence.Google Scholar

Loranger, A. W., Janca, A., & Sartorius, N. (1997). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders: The ICD-10 Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maden, A. (2007). Dangerous and severe personality disorder: Antecedents and origins. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 49(49), 8–11.Google Scholar

Markham, S. (2020). Collaborative risk assessment in secure and forensic mental health settings in the UK. General Psychiatry, 33, 1–6.Google Scholar

McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(3), 219–238.Google Scholar

Mental Health Act. (2007). Amendments to Mental Health Act 1983. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/12/contents Google Scholar

Mezzich, J. E. (2002). International surveys on the use of ICD-10 and related diagnostic systems. Psychopathology, 35, 72–75.Google Scholar

Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Millon, C. (2015). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–IV manual. Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar

Morey, L. C. (2004). The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). In Maruish, M. E. (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults (pp. 509–551). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Murphy, L., Gottfried, E., Dimario, K., Perkins, D, & Fedoroff, P. (2020). Use of penile plethysmography in the court: A review of practices in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 38(2), 79–99.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2009). Borderline personality disorder: Treatment and management (NICE Guideline No. 78). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg78 Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Antisocial personality disorder: Prevention and management (NICE Guideline No. 77). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg77 Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016). Mental health problems in people with learning disabilities: Prevention, assessment and management (NICE Guideline No. 54). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng54 Google Scholar

Ó Ciardha, C., Barnoux, M., Alleyne, E., Tyler, N., Mozova, K., & Gannon, T. (2015). Multiple factors in the assessment of firesetters’ fire interest and attitudes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 37–47.Google Scholar

Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C. P., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale – Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 318–329.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L. (1999). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding-7 (user’s manual). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In Braun, H., Jackson, D., & Wiley, D. (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 39–69). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perkins, D., Farr, C., Romero, J., Kirkpatrick, T., & Ebrahimjee, A. (2015). DSPD ten years on at Broadmoor. The Prison Service Journal, 128, 10–16.Google Scholar

Santtila, P., Mokros, A., Viljanen, K., Koivisto, M., Sandnabba, N. K., Zappalà, A., et al. (2009). Assessment of sexual interest using a choice reaction time task and priming: A feasibility study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1081–1090.Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. F., & Perkins, D. E. (2020). Using the Explicit and Implicit Sexual Interest Profile (EISIP) in applied forensic or clinical contexts. In Akerman, G., Perkins, D., & Bartels, R. (Eds.), Assessing and managing problematic sexual interests. Routledge.Google Scholar

Seto, M. C., & Eke, A. W. (2015). Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Law Human Behaviour, 39(4), 416–429.Google Scholar

Smith, G. P. (1997). Assessment of malingering with self-report instruments. In Rogers, R. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 351–370). Guilford.Google Scholar

Snowden, R. J., Wichter, J., & Gray, N. S. (2008). Implicit and explicit measurements of sexual preference in gay and heterosexual men: A comparison of priming techniques and the Implicit Association Task. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 37(4), 558–565.Google Scholar

Spielberger, D. C. (1999). STAXI-2 state trait anger expression inventory-2, professional manual. PAR.Google Scholar

Stephens, S., Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2019). The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) may be a measure of pedohebephilia. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(10), 1655–1663.Google Scholar

Tennent, G., Tennent, D., Prins, H., & Bedford, A. (1993). Is psychopathic disorder a treatable condition? Medicine, Science and the Law, 33(1), 63–66.Google Scholar

Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 139–153.Google Scholar

Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225–235; discussion 236–246.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P., Mulder, R., Crawford, M., Newton-Howes, G., Simonsen, E., Ndetei, D., Koldobsky, N., Fossati, A., Mbatia, J., & Barrett, B. (2010). Personality disorder: A new global perspective. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 56–60.Google Scholar

Walker, J. S. (2005). The Maudsley Violence Questionnaire: Initial validation and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 187–201.Google Scholar

Walters, G. D. (1995). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles. Part I-III: Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307–325.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2010). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar

Weschler, D. (2010). Wechsler Memory Scale (4th ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2011). Test of Premorbid Functioning. UK version (TOPF UK). Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2016). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wong, S. C. P., Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Gordon, A. (2003). Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version (VRS-SO). Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1990). Young Schema Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar

References

Allan, R., Lindsay, W. R., Macleod, F., & Smith, A. H. W. (2001). Treatment of women with intellectual disabilities who have been involved with the criminal justice system for reasons of aggression. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual disabilities, 14(4), 340–347.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental. American Psychiatric Pub.Google Scholar

British Psychological Society (2015). Guidance on the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disabilities in adulthood. Leicester: BPS.Google Scholar

Brookbanks, W., & Freckelton, I. (2018). Legal issues concerning offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In Lindsay, W. & Taylor, J. L. (Eds.), Wiley Handbook on Offenders with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (pp. 56–85). London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Care Quality Commission (2011). Count me in 2010: Results of the 2010 national census of inpatients and patients on supervised community treatment in mental health and learning disability services in England and Wales. London: Care Quality Commission.Google Scholar

Clare, I. C. H., Murphy, G. H., Cox, D., & Chaplin, E. H. (1992). Assessment and treatment of firesetting: A single case investigation using a cognitive behavioural model. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 2(3), 253–268.Google Scholar

Cohen, G., & Harvey, J. (2016). The use of psychological interventions for adult male sex offenders with a learning disability: A systematic review. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 22(2), 206–223.Google Scholar

Conolly, J. (1847). The construction and government of lunatic asylums and hospitals for the insane. London: John Churchill. https://books.google.co.uk Google Scholar

Courtney, J., & Rose, J. (2004). The effectiveness of treatment for male sex offenders with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10(2), 215–236.Google Scholar

Crocker, A. J., Cote, G., Toupin, J., & St-Onge, B. (2007). Rate and characteristics of men with an intellectual disability in pre-trial detention. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 143–152.Google Scholar

Davidson, M., Humphreys, M. S., Johnstone, E. C., Cunningham Owens, D. G. (1995). Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among remand prisoners in Scotland. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 545–548.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2001). Valuing people: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. Cm 5086. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2012a). Transforming care: A national response to Winterbourne View Hospital. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2015). Mental Health Act 1983: Code of practice. Norwich: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar

Department of Health and Social Security (1971). Better services for the mentally handicapped. London: Author.Google Scholar

Drope v Missouri, 420 US 162 (1975).Google Scholar

Dusky v United States, 362 US 402 (1960).Google Scholar

Emerson, E. (2004). Deinstitutionalisation in England. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29, 17–22.Google Scholar

Emerson, E., & Halpin, S. (2013). Anti-social behaviour and police contact among 13- to 15-year-old English adolescents with and without mild/moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(5), 362–369.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 6(36), 929–64.Google Scholar

Fazel, S., Xenitidis, K., & Powell, J. (2008). The prevalence of intellectual disabilities among 12,000 prisoners: A systematic review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(4), 369–373.Google Scholar

Freckelton, I. (2016). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, expert evidence and the unreliability of admissions during police interview. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(2), 173–183. Doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1149898Google Scholar

Freckelton, I. (2019). Expert evidence: Law, practice and procedure, 6th edn, Sydney: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar

Gall, J. A. M., & Freckelton, I. (1999). Fitness for interview: Current trends, views and an approach to the assessment procedure. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 6(4), 213–223.Google Scholar

Gannon, T. A., Olver, M. E., Mallion, J. S., & James, M. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101752.Google Scholar

Goodman, R., Simonoff, E., & Stevenson, J. (1995). The impact of child IQ, parent IQ and sibling IQ on child and behaviour deviance scores. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 36(3), 409–425.Google Scholar

Gray, N. S., Fitzgerald, S., Taylor, J., MacCulloch, M., & Snowden, R. (2007). Predicting future reconviction in offenders with intellectual disabilities: The predictive efficacy of the VRAG, PCL-SV and the HCR-20. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 474–79.Google Scholar

Hall, I., Clayton, P., & Johnson, P. (2005). Arson and learning disability. In Riding, T., Swann, C. & Swann, B. (Eds.), The handbook of forensic learning disabilities (pp. 51–72). Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar

Hall v Florida, 134 S Ct 1986 (2014).Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. (User report 1999-02). Ottowa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar

Hayes, S. (2018). Criminal behavior and intellectual and developmental disabilities. In Lindsay, W. R. & Taylor, J. L. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Research, training and practice (pp 21–37). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Health and Social Care Information Centre (2014). Inpatients formally detained in hospitals under the Mental Health Act 1983, and patients subject to community treatment: Annual report, England, 2013/14. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre.Google Scholar

Heaton, K. M. & Murphy, G. H. (2013). Men with intellectual disabilities who have attended sex offender treatment groups: A follow-up. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(5), 489–500.Google Scholar

Heddell, F. (1980). Accident of birth: Aspects of mental handicap. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar

Hogue, T., Steptoe, L., Taylor, J. L., Lindsay, W. R., Mooney, P., Pinkney, L., Johnston, S., Smith, A. H. W., & O’Brien, G. (2006). A comparison of offenders with intellectual disability across three levels of security. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 16(1), 13–28.Google Scholar

Holland, S., & Persson, P. (2011). Intellectual disability in the Victorian prison system: Characteristics of prisoners with an intellectual disability released from prison in 2003–2006. Psychology, Crime and Law, 17(1), 25–41.Google Scholar

Jones, E., & Chaplin, E. (2017). A systematic review of the effectiveness of psychological approaches in the treatment of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12345Google Scholar

Kerlin, I. N. (1858). A brief history of twenty-two imbecile children. Philadelphia, PA: Hunt.Google Scholar

Kim, B., Benekos, P. J., & Merlo, A. V. (2016). Sex offender recidivism revisited: Review of recent meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 17(1), 105–117.Google Scholar

Klimecki, M. R., Jenkinson, J., & Wilson, L. (1994). A study of recidivism among offenders with intellectual disability. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities. 19(3), 209–219.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R. (2009). The treatment of sex offenders with developmental disabilities. A practice workbook. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Allan, R., Macleod, F., Smart, N., & Smith, A. H. W. (2003). Long term treatment and management of violent tendencies of men with intellectual disabilities convicted of assault. Mental Retardation, 41(1), 47–56.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Allan, R., Parry, C., Macleod, F., Cottrell, J., Overend, H., & Smith, A. H. W. (2004). Anger and aggression in people with intellectual disabilities: Treatment and follow-up of consecutive referrals and a waiting list comparison. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 11(4), 225–264.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., & Dernevik, M. (2013). Risk and offenders with intellectual disabilities. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23, 151–157.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Hogue, T. E., Taylor, J. L., Steptoe, L., Mooney, P., O’Brien, G., Johnston, S., & Smith, A. H. W. (2008). Risk assessment in offenders with intellectual disability: A comparison across three levels of security. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(1), 90–111.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Steptoe, L., Wallace, L., Haut, F., & Brewster, E. (2013). An evaluation and 20 year follow up of recidivism in a community intellectual disability service. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23(2), 138–49.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Taylor, J. L., & Murphy, G. H. (2018). The treatment and management of sex offenders. In Lindsay, W. R. & Taylor, J. L. (Eds.). The Wiley handbook on offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Research, training and practice, pp. 229–247. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Linhorst, D. M., McCutchen, T. A., & Bennett, L. (2003). Recidivism among offenders with developmental disabilities participating in a case management Programme. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24(3), 210–230.Google Scholar

Lofthouse, R. E. Totsika, V., Hastings, V., Lindsay, R. P., Hogue, W. R., T., & Taylor, J. L. (2014). How do static and dynamic risk factors work together to predict violence amongst offenders with an intellectual disability? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58(2), 125–133.Google Scholar

Lund, J. (1990). Mentally retarded criminal offenders in Denmark. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156(5), 726–731.Google Scholar

Mackay, R., & Brookbanks, W. (2018). Fitness to plead: International and comparative perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Marotta, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of behavioral health interventions for sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. Sexual Abuse, 29(2), 148–185.Google Scholar

McGillivray, J. A., Gaskin, C. J., Newton, D. C., & Richardson, B. A. (2016). Substance use, offending, and participation in alcohol and drug treatment programmes: A comparison of prisoners with and without intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 29(3), 289–294.Google Scholar

Mears, D. P., & Cochran, J. C. (2013). What is the effect of IQ on offending? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(11), 1280–1300.Google Scholar

Meichenbaum, D. (1985). Stress inoculation training. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Mews, A., Di Bella, L., & Purver, M. (2017). Impact evaluation of the prison-based core sex offender treatment programme. London, UK: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar

Moffit, T. E., Gabrielli, W. F., Mednick, S. A., & Schulsinger, F. (1991). Socio-economic status, IQ and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90(2), 152–157.Google Scholar

Murphy, G. H., Powell, S., Guzman, A.-M., & Hays, S.-J. (2007). Cognitive-behavioural treatment for men with intellectual disabilities and sexually abusive behaviour: A pilot study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), 902–912.Google Scholar

Murphy, G. H., Sinclair, N., Hays, S. J., Heaton, K. M., Powell, S., Langdon, P. E., Stagg, J., Williams, J., Scott, J., Mercer, K., Lippold, T., Tufnell, J., Langheit, G., Goodman, W., Leggett, J., & Craig, L. A. (SOTSEC-ID) (2010). Effectiveness of Group Cognitive-Behavioural Treatment for Men with Intellectual Disabilities at Risk of Sexual Offending. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23(6), 537–551.Google Scholar

Murphy, G., & Triantafyllopoulou, P. (2017). Offenders with intellectual disabilities in prison: What happens when they leave? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 61(10): 957–968, DOI: 10.1111/jir.12374Google Scholar

NHS England (2015). Building the right support: a national plan to develop community services and close inpatient facilities for people with a learning disability and/or autism who display behaviour that challenges, including those with a mental health condition. Available at: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ld-nat-imp-plan-oct15.pdf Google Scholar

Nixon, M., Thomas, S., Daffern, M., & Ogloff, J. (2017). Estimating the risk of crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: A data-linkage study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 52(5), 617–626. DOI: 10.1007/s00127–017-1371-3.Google Scholar

Nicoll, M., Beail, N., & Saxon, D. (2013). Cognitive behavioural treatment for anger in adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(1), 47–62.Google Scholar

Novaco, R. W. (1975). Anger control: The development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar

Novaco, R. W., & Taylor, J. L. (2004). Assessment of anger and aggression in male offenders with developmental disabilities. Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 42–50.Google Scholar

Novaco, R. W., & Taylor, J. L. (2015). Reduction of assualtive behaviour following anger treatment of forensic hospital patients with intellectual disabilities. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 65, 52–59.Google Scholar

O’Brien, G., Taylor, J. L., Lindsay, W. R., Holland, A. J., Carson, D., Steptoe, L., Price, K., Middleton, C., & Wheeler, J. (2010). A multi-centre study of adults with learning disabilities referred to services for antisocial or offending behaviour: Demographic, individual, offending and service characteristics. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 1(2), 5–15.Google Scholar

Pora v The Queen [2015] UKPC 9.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Strugar, IT-01-42-A. Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Chamber for the Former State of Yugoslavia, 17 July 2008.Google Scholar

Quinsey, V. L. (2004). Risk assessment and management in community settings. In Lindsay, W. R., Taylor, J. L. & Sturmey, P. (Eds.), Offenders with developmental disabilities (pp. 131–142), Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

R v MT [2020] NZHC 1490.Google Scholar

R v Presser [1958] VR 45.Google Scholar

R v Pritchard (1836) 7 C & P 103; 173 ER 135.Google Scholar

Rice, M. E., & Chaplin, T. C. (1979). Social skills training for hospitalised male arsonists. Journal of Behaviour Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 10(2), 105–108.Google Scholar

Scheerenberger, R. C. (1983). A history of mental retardation. London: Brooks Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Schmucker, M., & Losel, F. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 597–630.Google Scholar

Seguin, E. (1846). Traitement moral, hygiène et éducation des idiots et des autres enfants arriérés. Paris, France: J.B. Bailliere.Google Scholar

Søndenaa, E., Rasmussen, K., Palmstierna, T., & Nøttestad, J. (2008). The prevalence and nature of intellectual disability in Norwegian prisons. Journal of Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 52(12), 1129–1137.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L. (2014). Roots, referrals, risks and remedies for offenders with intellectual disabilities. Paper presented to ‘A Risky Business’ BPS conference, October 2014, University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L. (2019a). Delivering the Transforming Care Programme: A case of smoke and mirrors? British Journal of Psychiatry Bulletin, 43(5), 201–203. doi:10.1192/bjb.2019.3Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L. (2019b). Developing discharge pathways for detained patients with intellectual disabilities. Paper presented at the Forensic Dual Diagnosis Speciality Service Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 18 September 2019.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., & Lindsay, W. R. (2018). Offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Future directions for research and development. In Lindsay, W. R. & Taylor, J. L. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Research, training and practice (pp. 453–471). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L. Hanna, J., Gillmer, B. T., & Ledwith, S. (2009). Code of Practice Mental Health Act 1983 (as amended by the Mental Health Act 2007). Interim supplementary guidance for chartered psychologists seeking approval and acting as Approved Clinicians. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., McKinnon, I., Thorpe, I., & Gillmer, B. T. (2017). The impact of Transforming Care on the care and safety of patients with learning disabilities and forensic needs. British Journal of Psychiatry Bulletin, 41(3), 205–208. DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.116.055095Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., & Novaco, R. W. (2005). Anger treatment for people with developmental disabilities: A theory, evidence and manual based approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., & Novaco, R. W. (2018). Treatment for anger, aggression and violence. In Lindsay, W. R. & Taylor, J. L. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Research, training and practice (pp 248–271). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., Novaco, R. W., Gillmer, B. T., Robertson, A., & Thorne, I. (2005). Individual cognitive-behavioural anger treatment for people with mild-borderline intellectual disabilities and histories of aggression: A controlled trial. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(3), 367–382.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., Novaco, R. W., Gillmer, B., & Thorne, I. (2002a). Cognitive-behavioural treatment of anger intensity among offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15(2), 151–165.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., Novaco, R. W., Guinan, C., & Street, N. (2004a). Development of an imaginal provocation test to evaluate treatment for anger problems in people with intellectual disabilities. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 11(4), 233–246.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., Robertson, A., Thorne, I., Belshaw, T., & Watson, A. (2006). Responses of female firesetters with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities to a group-based intervention. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19(2), 179–190.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., Thorne, I., Robertson, A., & Avery, G. (2002b). Evaluation of a group intervention for convicted arsonists with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12(4), 282–293.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. L., Thorne, I., & Slavkin, M. (2004b). Treatment of firesetters. In Lindsay, W. R., Taylor, J. L. & Sturmey, P. (Eds.), Offenders with developmental disabilities (pp. 221–240). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Terman, L. (1911). The measurement of intelligence. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar

Ward, T., & Gannon, T. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology and self-regulation: The comprehensive Good Lives Model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(1), 214–223.Google Scholar

Webster, C. D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K. S., & Wintrup, A. (1997). The HCR-20: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Version 2. Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University and British Colombia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

World Health Organisation (WHO) (1992). ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar

Wolfensburger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar

Wolfensburger, W. (1983). Social role valorization: A proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 19, 1–7.Google Scholar

References

Bick, J., & Nelson, C. A. (2016). Early adverse experiences and the developing brain. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(1), 177–196.Google Scholar

Blakemore, S. J. (2012). Development of the social brain in adolescence. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105(3), 111–116.Google Scholar

Bombardier, C. (2000). Alcohol and traumatic disability. In: R. Frank and T. Elliott, Handbook of rehabilitation psychology, pp. 399–416. American Psychological Association: Washington DC.Google Scholar

Carroll, L. J., Cassidy, J. D., Holm, L., et al. (2004). Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43,113–125.Google Scholar

Colantonio, A., Kim, H., Allen, S., Asbridge, M., Petgrave, J., & Brochu, S. (2014). Traumatic brain injury and early life experiences among men and women in a prison population. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 20(4), 271–279.Google Scholar

College of Policing (2014). Detention and custody. www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/detention-and-custody-2/Google Scholar

Corrigan, J. D., & Bogner, J. (2007). Screening and identification of TBI. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 22(6), 315–317.Google Scholar

Corrigan, J. D., & Hammond, F. M. (2013). Traumatic brain injury as a chronic health condition. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(6), 1199–1201.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. M., Harzke, A. J., Magaletta, P. R., Cummins, A. G., & Frankowski, R. (2007). Screening for traumatic brain injury in an offender sample: A first look at the reliability and validity of the Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 22(6), 330–338.Google Scholar

Elbogen, E. B., Wolfe, J. R., Cueva, M., Sullivan, C., & Johnson, J. (2015). Longitudinal predictors of criminal arrest after traumatic brain injury: results from the Traumatic Brain Injury Model System National Database. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 30(5), 3–13.Google Scholar

Farrer, T. J., & Hedges, D. W. (2011). Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in incarcerated groups compared to the general population: A meta-analysis. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 35(2), 390–394.Google Scholar

Farrer, T. J., Frost, R. B., & Hedges, D. W. (2012). Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in intimate partner violence offenders compared to the general population: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(2), 77–82.Google Scholar

Farrer, T. J., Frost, R. B., & Hedges, D. W. (2013). Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in juvenile offenders: A meta-analysis. Child Neuropsychology, 19(3), 225–234.Google Scholar

Fazel, S., Lichtenstein, P., Grann, M., & Långström, N. (2011). Risk of violent crime in individuals with epilepsy and traumatic brain injury: A 35-year Swedish population study. PLoS Med, 8(12), e1001150.Google Scholar

Frost, R. B., Farrer, T. J., Primosch, M., & Hedges, D. W. (2013). Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in the general adult population: A meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology, 40(3), 154–159.Google Scholar

Goldstein, K. (1959). Notes on the developments of my concepts. Journal Individual Psychology, 15, 5–14.Google Scholar

Harrison-Felix, C. L., Whiteneck, G. G., Jha, A., DeVivo, M. J., Hammond, F. M., & Hart, D. M. (2009). Mortality over four decades after traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A retrospective cohort study. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 90(9), 1506–1513.Google Scholar

James, S. L., Theadom, A., Elenbogen, R. G., et al. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurology, 18, 56–87.Google Scholar

Kennedy, E., Heron, J., & Munafò, M. (2017). Substance use, criminal behaviour and psychiatric symptoms following childhood traumatic brain injury: Findings from the ALSPAC cohort. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 26(10), 1197–1206.Google Scholar

Kwako, L. E., Glass, N., Campbell, J., Melvin, K. C., Barr, T., & Gill, J. M. (2011). Traumatic brain injury in intimate partner violence: A critical review of outcomes and mechanisms. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12(3), 115–126.Google Scholar

Luukkainen, S., Riala, K., Laukkanen, M., Hakko, H., & Räsänen, P. (2012). Association of traumatic brain injury with criminality in adolescent psychiatric inpatients from Northern Finland. Psychiatry Research, 200(2-3), 767–772.Google Scholar

McGinley, A., & McMillan, T. (2019). The prevalence, characteristics, and impact of head injury in female prisoners: A systematic PRISMA review. Brain injury, 33(13-14), 1581–1591.Google Scholar

McIsaac, K. E., Moser, A., Moineddin, R., Keown, L. A., Wilton, G., Stewart, L. A., … & Matheson, F. I. (2016). Association between traumatic brain injury and incarceration: A population-based cohort study. CMAJ open, 4(4), E746.Google Scholar

McKinlay, A., Corrigan, J., Horwood, L. J., & Fergusson, D. M. (2014). Substance abuse and criminal activities following traumatic brain injury in childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(6), 498–506.Google Scholar

McMillan, T. M., Jongen, E. L., & Greenwood, R. J. (1996). Assessment of post-traumatic amnesia after severe closed head injury: Retrospective or prospective?. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 60(4), 422–427.Google Scholar

McMillan, T. M. (2015). Post traumatic amnesia. International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2(8), 636–639.Google Scholar

McMillan, T. M., Weir, C. J., & Wainman-Lefley, J. (2014). Mortality and morbidity 15 years after hospital admission with mild head injury: A prospective case-controlled population study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 85(11), 1214–1220.Google Scholar

McMillan, T. M., & Williams, H. (2017). Neurobehavioural Disability and the Criminal Justice System. In: McMillan, T. M. and Wood, R. L., Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury (2nd Ed), pp. 57–68. Routledge: Oxon.Google Scholar

McMillan, T. M., & Wood, R. L. (2017). Neurobehavioural Disability and Social Handicap following Traumatic Brain Injury. (2nd Ed.). Routledge: Oxon.Google Scholar

McMillan, T. M., Graham, L., Pell, J. P., McConnachie, A., & Mackay, D. F. (2019). The lifetime prevalence of hospitalised head injury in Scottish prisons: A population study. Plos One, 14(1), e0210427.Google Scholar

Moynan, C. R., & McMillan, T. M. (2018). Prevalence of head injury and associated disability in prison populations: A systematic review. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 33(4), 275–282.Google Scholar

National Prisoner Healthcare Network. Brain Injury and Offending (2016). NHS Scotland, Edinburgh. www.nphn.scot.nhs.uk/Google Scholar

Pitman, I., Haddlesey, C., Ramos, S. D., Oddy, M., & Fortescue, D. (2015). The association between neuropsychological performance and self-reported traumatic brain injury in a sample of adult male prisoners in the UK. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25(5), 763–779.Google Scholar

Ponsford, J., Facem, P. C., Willmott, C., Rothwell, A., Kelly, A. M., Nelms, R., & Ng, K. T. (2004). Use of the Westmead PTA scale to monitor recovery of memory after mild head injury. Brain Injury, 18(6), 603–614.Google Scholar

Rosen, D. L., Hammond, W. P., Wohl, D. A., & Golin, C. E. (2012). Disease prevalence and use of health care among a national sample of black and white male state prisoners. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 23(1), 254.Google Scholar

Russell, W. R., Nathan, P. W. (1946). Traumatic amnesia. Brain, 69, 280–300Google Scholar

Ryan, N. P., Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Beauchamp, M. H., Coleman, L., Eren, S., … & Catroppa, C. (2014). Predictors of very-long-term sociocognitive function after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Evidence for the vulnerability of the immature ‘social brain’. Journal of Neurotrauma, 31(7), 649–657.Google Scholar

Schofield, P., Butler, T., Hollis, S., & D’Este, C. (2011). Are prisoners reliable survey respondents? A validation of self-reported traumatic brain injury (TBI) against hospital medical records. Brain Injury, 25(1), 74–82.Google Scholar

Schofield, P. W., Malacova, E., Preen, D. B., D’Este, C., Tate, R., Reekie, J., … & Butler, T. (2015). Does traumatic brain injury lead to criminality? A whole-population retrospective cohort study using linked data. PLoS One, 10(7), e0132558.Google Scholar

Schofield, P. W., Mason, R., Nelson, P. K., Kenny, D., & Butler, T. (2019). Traumatic brain injury is highly associated with self-reported childhood trauma within a juvenile offender cohort. Brain Injury, 33(4), 412–418.Google Scholar

Shiroma, E. J., Ferguson, P. L., & Pickelsimer, E. E. (2010). Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in an offender population: A meta-analysis. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 16(2), 147–159.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. K., Sabaz, M., & Daher, M. (2013). Prevalence, clinical features, and correlates of inappropriate sexual behavior after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter study. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 28(3), 202–210.Google Scholar

Timonen, M., Miettunen, J., Hakko, H., Zitting, P., Veijola, J., von Wendt, L., & Räsänen, P. (2002). The association of preceding traumatic brain injury with mental disorders, alcoholism and criminality: The Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Study. Psychiatry Research, 113(3), 217–226.Google Scholar

Thornhill, S., Teasdale, G. M., Murray, G. D., McEwen, J., Roy, C. W., & Penny, K. I. (2000). Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: Prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 320(7250), 1631–1635.Google Scholar

Vaughn, M. G., Salas‐Wright, C. P., DeLisi, M., & Perron, B. (2014). Correlates of traumatic brain injury among juvenile offenders: A multi‐site study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24(3), 188–203.Google Scholar

Walker, W. C., Ketchum, J. M., Marwitz, J. H., Chen, T., Hammond, F., Sherer, M., & Meythaler, J. (2010). A multicentre study on the clinical utility of post-traumatic amnesia duration in predicting global outcome after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 81(1), 87–89.Google Scholar

Weil, Z. M., Corrigan, J. D., & Karelina, K. (2016). Alcohol abuse after traumatic brain injury: Experimental and clinical evidence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 62, 89–99.Google Scholar

Williams, C., & Wood, R. L. (2017). Disorders of emotion recognition and expression. In: McMillan, T. M. and Wood, R. L., Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury (2nd Ed.), pp. 30–42. Routledge: Oxon.Google Scholar

Williams, W., Cordan, G., Mewse, A. J., Tonks, J., & Burgess, C. N. (2010). Self-reported traumatic brain injury in male young offenders: A risk factor for re-offending, poor mental health and violence?. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(6), 801–812.Google Scholar

Williams, W. H., Chitsabesan, P., Fazel, S., McMillan, T., Hughes, N., Parsonage, M., & Tonks, J. (2018). Traumatic brain injury: A potential cause of violent crime?. The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(10), 836–844.Google Scholar

Wood, R. L., (2017). Disorders of impulse control. In: McMillan, T. M. and Wood, R. L., Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury (2nd Ed.), pp. 43–56. Routledge: OxonGoogle Scholar

Wood, R. L., & Worthington, A. (2017). Neurobehavioral abnormalities associated with executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 195.Google Scholar

References

Ægisdóttir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., … Rush, J. D. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 341–382.Google Scholar

Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs and crime rates (Document ID 06-10-1201). Retrieved from Washington State Institute for Public Policy website: www. wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/06-10-1201.pdf Google Scholar

Balko, R. (2018, September 18). There’s overwhelming evidence that the criminal-justice system is racist. Here’s the proof. Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/news/opinions/wp/2018/09/18/theres-overwhelming-evidence-that-the-criminal-justice-system-is-racist-heres-the-proof/Google Scholar

Barrett, K., & Greene, R. (2016, September). To work on parole boards, no experience necessary. Retrieved from www.governing.com/columns/smart-mgmt/gov-parole-boards-hiring-decisions.html Google Scholar

Bengtson, S., & Langstrom, N. (2007). Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: A direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(2), 135–153.Google Scholar

Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T. L., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., & Li, J. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1127–1148.Google Scholar

Bottoms, A., & Roberts, J. (2010). Hearing the victim: Adversarial justice, crime victims and the state. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bradley, M. S., & Engen, R. L. (2016). Leaving prison: A multilevel investigation of racial, ethnic, and gender disproportionality in correctional release. Crime & Delinquency, 62(2), 253–279.Google Scholar

Brown, S. L., St. Amand, M. D., & Zamble, E. (2009). The dynamic prediction of criminal recidivism: A three-wave prospective study. Law and Human Behavior, 33(1), 25–45.Google Scholar

Burke, P. B. (2011). The future of parole as a key partner in assuring public safety. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.Google Scholar

Burke, P. B., & Tonry, M. H. (2006). Successful transition and reentry for safer communities: A call to action for parole. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Effective Public Policy.Google Scholar

Burkes, K. J., Rhine, E. E., Robey, J. P., & Ruhland, E. L. (2017). Releasing authority chairs: A comparative snapshot across three decades. Minneapolis, MN: Robina Institute of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice.Google Scholar

Caplan, J. M. (2007). What factors affect parole – a review of empirical research. Federal Probation, 71(1), 16–19.Google Scholar

Chadwick, N., deWolf, A. H., & Serin, R. C. (2015). Effectively training community supervision officers: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(10), 977–989.Google Scholar

Colorado Board of Parole. (2012). Parole board release guide instrument. Retrieved from https://cdpsdocs.state.co.us/ors/docs/Risks/SUMMARY-PBRGI_2012-11-01.pdf Google Scholar

Conner, D. P. (2016). How to get out of prison: Views from parole board members. Corrections: Policy, Practice, and Research, 1(2), 107–126.Google Scholar

Council of State Governments. (2018). Confined and costly: How supervision violations are filling prisons and burdening budgets. Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/confinedandcostly/Google Scholar

Dickson, S. R., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Casey, A. R. (2013) Can the quality of high-risk violent prisoners’ release plans predict recidivism following intensive rehabilitation? A comparison with risk assessment instruments. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(4), 371–389.Google Scholar

Elgoben, E. B., Mercado, C. C., Scalora, M. J., & Tomkins, A. J. (2002). Perceived relevance of factors for violence risk assessment: A survey of clinicians. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(1), 37–47.Google Scholar

Fouzder, M. (2018, January 5). Parole chief announces transparency consultation amid Worboys furore. Retrieved from www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/parole-chief-announces-transparency-consultation-amid-worboys-furore-/5064213.article Google Scholar

Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole. (2020). Parole consideration, eligibility and guidelines. Retrieved from https://pap.georgia.gov/parole-consideration/parole-consideration-eligibility-guidelines Google Scholar

Grierson, J. (2018, November 9). Parole board has no black people among 240 members. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/society/2018/nov/09/parole-board-diversity-crisis-black-members Google Scholar

Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of formal (mechanical, algorithmic) and informal (subjective, impressionistic) prediction procedures: The clinical/statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 293–323.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K. (2009). The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Canadian Psychology, 50(3), 172–182.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., McGrath, R. J., Kroner, D., D’Amora, D. A., Thomas, S. S., & Tavarez, L. P. (2017). A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results in corrections through the development of a common language. Justice Center: The National Reentry Resource Center. Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/nrrc/publications/a-five-level-risk-and-needs-system-maximizing-assessment-results-in-corrections-through-the-development-of-a-common-language/Google Scholar

Herberman, E. J., & Bonczar, T. P. (2014). Probation and parole in the United States, 2013. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar

Hilton, N. Z., Carter, A. M., Harris, G. T., & Sharpe, A. J. B. (2008). Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(2), 171–188.Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. B. (2003). History of the federal parole system. Retrieved from www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/uspc/legacy/2009/10/07/history.pdf Google Scholar

Huebner, B. M., & Bynum, T. S. (2008). The role of race and ethnicity in parole decisions. Criminology, 46(4), 907–938.Google Scholar

Lin, J., Grattet, R., & Petersilia, J. (2010). “Back‐end sentencing” and reimprisonment: Individual, organizational, and community predictors of parole sanctioning decisions. Criminology, 48(3), 759–795.Google Scholar

Linsey, S. C., & Miller, M. K. (2011). Discretionary release decisions of actual and mock parole board members: Implications for community sentiment and parole decision-making research. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 18(4), 498–516.Google Scholar

Lloyd, C. D., Perley-Robertson, B., & Serin, R. C. (2019). Age and strengths in a community corrections sample. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 19(3), 215–226.Google Scholar

Lloyd, C. D., & Serin, R. C. (2012). Agency and outcome expectancies for crime desistance: Measuring offenders’ personal beliefs about change. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 6, 543–565.Google Scholar

Kennealy, P. J., Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S. M., & Eno Louden, J. (2012). Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 496–505.Google Scholar

Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 22(35), 22–54.Google Scholar

Martinson, R. (1976). California research at the crossroads. Crime and Delinquency, 22(2), 180–191.Google Scholar

Meehl, P. E. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence (New Preface). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield/Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1954)Google Scholar

Ministry of Justice. (n.d.). IPP factsheet. Retrieved from www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/legislation/bills-acts/legal-aid-sentencing/ipp-factsheet.pdf Google Scholar

Morgan, K. D., & Smith, B. (2008). The impact of race on parole decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 25(2), 411–435.Google Scholar

Mujuzi, J. D. (2016). A prisoner’s right to be released or place on parole: A comment on Öcalan v. Turkey (No. 2) (18 March 2014). Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 9(1), 69–92.Google Scholar

Turkey, Öcalan v. (No. 2), Application nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07 (March 18, 2014) (Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Pinto De Albuquerque)Google Scholar

Office of the Correctional Investigator. (2020). 2018–2019 annual report. Retrieved from www.oci-bec.gc.ca/cnt/rpt/pdf/annrpt/annrpt20182019-eng.pdf Google Scholar

Ostermann, M. (2015). How do former inmates perform in the community? A survival analysis of rearrests, reconvictions, and technical parole violations. Crime & Delinquency, 61(2), 163–187.Google Scholar

Parole Board of Canada. (2018a). History of parole in Canada. Retrieved from www.canada.ca/en/parole-board/corporate/history-of-parole-in-canada.html Google Scholar

Parole Board Canada. (2018b). 2017–2018 performance monitoring report. Retrieved from www.canada.ca/en/parole-board/corporate/transparency/reporting-to-canadians/performance-monitoring-report/2017-2018.html Google Scholar

Parole Board for England and Wales. (2019a). The parole board decision-making framework. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843522/Decision_Making_Framework_Public_Document.pdf Google Scholar

Parole Board for England and Wales. (2019b). The parole board: Working with others to protect the public. Annual report and accounts 2018/19. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/818677/The_Parole_Board_for_England___Wales_Annual_Report_and_Accounts_2018-19.pdf Google Scholar

Parsonage, W. H., Bernat, F. P., & Helfgott, J. (1992). Victim impact testimony and Pennsylvania`s parole decision making process: A pilot study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3, 187–206.Google Scholar

Petersilia, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Public safety and reintegration challenges. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 360–375.Google Scholar

Petersilia, J., & Reitz, K. R. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of sentencing and corrections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pickett, J. T., Mancini, C., & Mears, D. P. (2013). Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: Explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology, 51(3), 729–759.Google Scholar

Public Safety Canada. (2018). 2018 Corrections and conditional release statistical overview. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.Google Scholar

Re, R. M., & Solow-Niederman, A. (2019). Developing artificially intelligent justice. Stanford Technical Law Review, 22, 242–289.Google Scholar

Rhine, E. E., Petersilia, J., & Reitz, K. R. (2016). The future of parole release: A ten-point reform plan. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 16, 1–69.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. (2009). Listening to the crime victim: Evaluating victim input at sentencing and parole. Crime and Justice, 38(1), 347–412.Google Scholar

Ruhland, E. L., Rhine, E. E., Robey, J. P., & Mitchell, K. L. (2016). The continuing leverage of releasing authorities: Findings from a national study. Minneapolis, MN: Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice.Google Scholar

Schlager, M. D., & Robbins, K. (2008). Does parole work? Revisited: Reframing the discussion of the impact of postprison supervision on offender outcome. The Prison Journal, 88(2), 234–251.Google Scholar

Schwartzapfel, B. (2015a). Nine things you probably didn’t know about parole. Retrieved from www.themarshallproject.org/2015/07/10/nine-things-you-probably-didn-t-know-about-parole Google Scholar

Schwartzapfel, B. (2015b). Life without parole. Retrieved from www.themarshallproject.org/2015/07/10/life-without-parole Google Scholar

Serin, R. C., Chadwick, N., & Lloyd, C. D. (2015). Dynamic risk and protective factors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 151–170.Google Scholar

Serin, R. C., & Gobeil, R. (2013). Analysis of the use of the structured decision-making framework in three states. (NIC Accession No. 028408)Google Scholar

Serin, R. C., Gobeil, R., Lloyd, C. D., Chadwick, N., Wardrop, K., & Prell, L. (2016). Using dynamic risk to enhance conditional release decisions in prisoners to improve their outcomes. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 34(2), 321–336.Google Scholar

Shaffer, J. (2020, March 5). Personal communication.Google Scholar

Smith, P., Gendreau, P., & Swartz, (2009). Validating the principles of effective intervention: A systematic review of the contributions of meta-analysis in the field of corrections. Victims and Offenders, 4, 148–169.Google Scholar

Smith, B. L., Watkins, E., & Morgan, K. (1997). The effect of victim participation on parole decisions: Results from a southeastern state. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 8(1), 57–74.Google Scholar

Travis, L. F., & Stacey, J. (2010). A half century of parole rules: Conditions of parole in the United States, 2008. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 604–608.Google Scholar

Solomon, A. L., Kachnowski, V., & Bhati, A. (2005). Does parole work? Analyzing the impact of postprison supervision on rearrest outcomes. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar

US Courts. (2017). Incarceration costs significantly more than supervision. Retrieved from www.uscourts.gov/news/2017/08/17/incarceration-costs-significantly-more-supervision Google Scholar

Vito, G. F., Higgins, G. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2017). The effectiveness of parole supervision: Use of propensity score matching to analyze reincarceration rates in Kentucky. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(7), 627–640.Google Scholar

Wardrop, K., Serin, R. C., Gobeil, R., Rentler, D., & Braxton, R. (2017, April). An evaluation of the structured decision making framework in 3 U.S. states. Workshop presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Paroling Authorities International Training Conference, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar

Wardrop, K., Serin, R. C., & Rentler, D. (2019 ). Evaluating the structured parole decision making framework in three U.S. states. The American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 37(2).Google Scholar

Young, K. M., Mukamal, D. A., & Favre-Bulle, T. (2015). Predicting parole grants: An analysis of suitability hearings for California’s lifer inmates. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 28(4), 268–277.Google Scholar

References

Ægisdóttir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., Nichols, C. N., Lampropoulos, G. K., Walkers, B. S., Cohen, G., & Rush, J. D. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 341–382.Google Scholar

Allan, A., Dawson, D., & Allan, M. M. (2006). Prediction of the risk of male sexual reoffending in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 41(1), 60–68.Google Scholar

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar

Babchishin, K.M, Hanson, R.K., & Helmus, L. (2012). Even highly correlated measures can add incrementally to predicting recidivism among sex offenders. Assessment, 19(4), 442–461.Google Scholar

Baltieri, D. A., & de Andrade, A. G. (2008). Comparing serial and nonserial sexual offenders: Alcohol and street drug consumption, impulsiveness and history of sexual abuse. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 30(1), 25–31.Google Scholar

Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 490–521.Google Scholar

Beggs, S. M., & Grace, R. C. (2010). Assessment of dynamic risk factors: An independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 234–251.Google Scholar

Bengtson, S. (2008). Is new better? A cross-validation of the Static-2002 and the Risk Matrix 2000 in a Danish sample of sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(2), 85–106.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., & Hart, S. D. (2009). Sex Offender Risk Assessment: Research, Evaluation, ‘Best-practice’ Recommendations and Future Directions. In Ireland, J. L., Ireland, C. A. & Birch, P. (Eds.), Violent and sexual offenders: Assessment, treatment, and management (pp. 27–42). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk – 20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, BC: Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Proactive Resolutions.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (2017). Manual for version 2 of the Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20 V2): Structured Professional Judgment guidelines for assessing and managing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, BC: Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123–142.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.Google Scholar

Cortoni, F., Hanson, R. K., & Choache, M.-E. (2010). The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(4), 387–401.Google Scholar

Craig, L. A., & Beech, A. R. (2010). Towards a guide to best practice in conducting actuarial risk assessments with sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(4), 278–293.Google Scholar

Craig, L. A., Beech, A. R., & Browne, K. D. (2006). Cross-validation of the Risk Matrix 2000 Sexual and Violent scales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(5), 612–633.Google Scholar

Craig, L. A., & Rettenberger, M. (2016). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the theories, assessment, and treatment of sexual offending – volume II: Assessment. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgement. Science, 243(4899), 1668–1674.Google Scholar

de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., van Beek, D., & Mead, G. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(3), 235–251.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrge, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk for violence – user’s guide. Burnaby, Canada: Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Hart, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Services, 54(10), 1372–1379.Google Scholar

Ducro, C., & Pham, T. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(1), 15–26.Google Scholar

Eher, R., Matthes, A., Schilling, F. Haubner-MacLean, T., & Rettenberger, M. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(1), 5–28.Google Scholar

Eher, R., Olver, M. E., Heurix, I., Schilling, F., & Rettenberger, M. (2015). Predicting reoffense in pedophilic child molesters by clinical diagnoses and risk assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 39(6), 571–580.Google Scholar

Eisenbarth, H., Osterheider, M., Nedopil, N., & Stadtland, C. (2012). Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30(5), 575–584.Google Scholar

Etzler, S., Eher, R., & Rettenberger, M. (2018). Dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Validity and dimensional structure of the Stable-2007. Assessment. Advance online publication. 10.1177/1073191118754705Google Scholar

Glover, A. J. J., Churcher, F. P., Gray, A. L., Mills, J. F., & Nicholson, D. E. (2017). A crossvalidation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide—Revised (VRAG-R) within a correctional sample. Law and Human Behavior, 41(6), 507–518.Google Scholar

Gray, N. S., Fitzgerald, S., Taylor, J., MacCulloch, M. J., & Snowden, R. J. (2007). Predicting future reconviction in offenders with intellectual disabilities: The predictive efficacy of VRAG, PCL-SV, and the HCR-20. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 474–479.Google Scholar

Gregório Hertz, P., Eher, R., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger, M. (2019). Cross-validation of the revised version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a sample of individuals convicted of sexual offences. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219841901 Google Scholar

Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical—statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 293–323.Google Scholar

Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19–30.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K. (2009). The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Canadian Psychology, 50(3), 172–182.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 6–35.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2014). High risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(15), 2792–2813.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R, Scott, T. L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Corrections research user report 2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/crp2007-05-en.pdf Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Helmus, M.-L., & Harris, A. J. R. (2015). Assessing the risk and needs of supervised sexual offenders: A prospective study using STABLE-2007, Static-99R, and Static-2002R. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(12), 1205–1224.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2007). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessment for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis (Corrections Research User Report No. 2007-01). Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Sheahan, C. L., & van Zuylen, H. (2013). STATIC-99 and RRASOR predict recidivism among developmentally delayed sexual offenders: A cumulative meta-analysis. Sexual Offender Treatment, 8(1), 1–14. Retrieved from www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/index.php?id=119&type=123 Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333 Google Scholar

Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(4), 315–335.Google Scholar

Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Cormier, C. A. (2015). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Lalumière, M. L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 413–425.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., & Boer, D. P. (2010). Structured Professional Judgement guidelines for sexual violence risk assessment: The Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20) and Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). In Otto, R. K. & Douglas, K. S. (Eds.). Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 269–294). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Thornton, D., Babchishin, K. M., & Harris, A. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 1148–1171.Google Scholar

Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(1), 64–101.Google Scholar

Hilton, N. Z., Carter, A. M., Harris, G. T., & Sharpe, A. J. B. (2008a). Does using non-numerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision-making. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(2), 171–188.Google Scholar

Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Houghton, R. E., & Eke, A. W. (2008b). An indepth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 150–163.Google Scholar

Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2006). Sixty-six years of research on the clinical versus actuarial prediction of violence. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 400–409.Google Scholar

Hill, A., Rettenberger, M., Habermann, N., Berner, W., Eher, R., & Briken, P. (2012). The utility of risk assessment instruments for the prediction of recidivism in sexual homicide perpetrators. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(18), 3553–3578.Google Scholar

Klein, V., Rettenberger, M., Yoon, D., Köhler, N., & Briken, P. (2015). Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 71–90.Google Scholar

Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2015). SARA-V3: User manual for version 3 of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Proactive Resolutions.Google Scholar

Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1999). Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 191–217.Google Scholar

Marshall, W. L. (2006). Clinical and research limitations in the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders. Sexual Offender Treatment, 1(1), 1–19. Retrieved from http://sexual-offender-treatment.org/index.php?id=18&type=123 Google Scholar

Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Guarnera, L. A., & Rufino, K. (2013). Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1889–1897.Google Scholar

Neal, T. M. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). The cognitive underpinnings of bias in forensic mental health evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 200–211.Google Scholar

Olver, M. E., & Sewall, L. (2018). Cross-validation of the discrimination and calibration properties of the VRAG-R in a treated sexual offender sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(6), 741–761.Google Scholar

Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 318–329.Google Scholar

Otto, R. K., & Douglas, K. S. (2010). Handbook of violence risk assessment. Oxford, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Quinsey, V.L., Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Cormier, C.A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Rettenberger, M., & Craig, L. A. (2016). Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders. In Craig, L. A. & Rettenberger, M. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the theories, assessment, and treatment of sexual offending – Volume II: Assessment (pp. 609–641). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rettenberger, M., & Eher, R. (2013). Actuarial risk assessment in sexually motivated intimate-partner violence. Law and Human Behavior, 37(2), 75–86.Google Scholar

Rettenberger, M., Haubner-MacLean, T., & Eher, R. (2013). The contribution of age to the Static-99 risk assessment in a population-based prison sample of sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(12), 1413–1433.Google Scholar

Rettenberger, M. Matthes, A., Boer, D. P., & Eher, R. (2010). Actuarial recidivism risk assessment and sexual delinquency: A comparison of five risk assessment tools in different sexual offender subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 169–186.Google Scholar

Rettenberger, M., Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Eher, R. (2017). Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG). Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 624–638.Google Scholar

Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 737–748.Google Scholar

Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC, Cohen’s d and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620.Google Scholar

Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Hilton, N. Z. (2010). The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide and Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide for violence risk assessment and the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment and Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for wife assault risk assessment. In Otto, R. & Douglas, K. (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment tools (pp. 99–119). Oxford, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Lang, C. (2013). Validation of and revision to the VRAG and SORAG: The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised (VRAG-R). Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 951–965.Google Scholar

Schwalbe, C. S., Fraser, M. W., Day, S. H., & Cooley, V. (2006). Classifying juvenile offenders according to risk of recidivism: Predictive validity, race/ethnicity, and gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(3), 305–324.Google Scholar

Scurich, N., & John, R. S. (2011). The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 35(2), 83-91.Google Scholar

Singer, J. C., Boer, D. P., & Rettenberger, M. (2013). A convergent approach to sex offender risk assessment. In Harrison, K. & Rainey, B. (Hrsg.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of legal and ethical aspects of sex offender treatment and management (pp. 341–355). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Singh, J. P., Bjørkly, S., & Fazel, S. (2016). International perspectives on violence risk assessment. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sjöstedt, G., & Långstrom, N. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A crossvalidation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25(6), 629–645.Google Scholar

Skelton, A., Riley, D., Wales, D., & Vess, J. (2006). Assessing risk for sexual offenders in New Zealand: Development and validation of a computer-scored risk measure. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12(3), 277–286.Google Scholar

Webster, C. D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K. S., & Wintrup, A. (1995). The HCR-20 Scheme: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University and British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.Google Scholar

Wong, S. C., & Gordon, A. (2009). Manual for the Violence Risk Scale (VRS). Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar

Yang, M., Wong, S. C., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part III - Assessment

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive