Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:47:22.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Female Sexual Orientation Spectrum in Evolutionary Perspective

from Part I - Controversies and Unresolved Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

By
Scott W. Semenyna ,
Paul L. Vasey  and
P. Lynne Honey
Edited by
Todd K. Shackelford
Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Oakland University, Michigan
Get access

Summary

Human female sexual orientation has received increased attention from scholars in evolutionary and sexuality-related sciences. As our understanding of female sexual orientation matures, especially same-sex attractions, many of our scientific assumptions must similarly progress. Better operational definitions will help focus current theoretical frameworks for understanding same-sex attraction among females, and guide future refinements to these models. Here we advocate for more precise characterization of the female sexual orientation spectrum, which in turn forces reconsideration of two pervasive assumptions in this domain. The first is that female sexual orientation is accurately characterized as a smooth unidimensional continuum. While concepts and terminology that aid our understanding of female same-sex attraction often convey stepwise gradations along a sexual orientation spectrum, we present relevant considerations for treating categories of female sexual orientation as more dissociable than typically acknowledged. Reframing this discussion leads naturally to reconsidering a second assumption –that all female same-sex attractions require adaptationist explanations, or the same kind of evolutionary account. Here we propose that most female non-heterosexuality poses little or no challenge to Darwinian frameworks, although evolutionary considerations can nonetheless help our understanding of the proximate development of such attractions.

Keywords

female gynephiliasexual orientationintrasexual competitionintersexual mate competition
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology , pp. 3 - 27
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008). Cohort differences in tolerance of homosexuality: Attitudinal change in Canada and the United States, 1981–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 311–330.Google Scholar
Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 403–409.Google Scholar
Apostolou, M. (2017). Individual mate choice in an arranged marriage context: Evidence from the Standard Cross-cultural Sample. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(3), 193–200.Google Scholar
Apostolou, M., Shialos, M., Khalil, M., & Paschali, V. (2017). The evolution of female same-sex attraction: The male choice hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 372–378.Google Scholar
Apostolou, M., Wang, Y., & O, J. (2018). Do men prefer women who are attracted to women? A cross-cultural evolutionary investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 31–39.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In Hope, D. A. (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (Vol. 54, pp. 43–63). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. M., Vasey, P. L., Diamond, L. M., Breedlove, S. M., Vilain, E., & Epprecht, M. (2016). Sexual orientation, controversy, and science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 45–101.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C. (2020). Deciding what to observe: Thoughts for a post-WEIRD generation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 347–374.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 166–203.Google Scholar
Ben Mocha, Y. (2020). Why do human and non-human species conceal mating? The cooperation maintenance hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1932), 20201330.Google Scholar
Bettinsoli, M. L., Suppes, A., & Napier, J. L. (2019). Predictors of attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women in 23 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619887785Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2018). Personality and sexual orientation: Extension to asexuality and the HEXACO model. Journal of Sex Research, 55(8), 951–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogaert, A. F., & Skorska, M. N. (2020). A short review of biological research on the development of sexual orientation. Hormones and Behavior, 119, 104659.Google Scholar
Breedlove, S. M. (2017). Prenatal influences on human sexual orientation: Expectations versus data. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1583–1592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burri, A., Spector, T., & Rahman, Q. (2015). Common genetic factors among sexual orientation, gender nonconformity, and number of sex partners in female twins: Implications for the evolution of homosexuality. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(4), 1004–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533–548.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110.Google Scholar
Camperio Ciani, A., Battaglia, U., Cesare, L., Camperio Ciani, G., & Capiluppi, C. (2018). Possible balancing selection in human female homosexuality. Human Nature, 29(1), 14–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, G. L., Campbell, A. C., & Muncer, S. (2014). The Dark Triad: Beyond a ‘male’ mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 159–164.Google Scholar
Carter, G. L., Montanaro, Z., Linney, C., & Campbell, A. C. (2015). Women’s sexual competition and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 275–279.Google Scholar
Chivers, M. L. (2017). The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1161–1179.Google Scholar
Coome, L. A., Skorska, M. N., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2020). Direct reproduction and sexual orientation and gender diversity in Thailand. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508–020-01830-8Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. D., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2016). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology – Vol. 1: Foundations, 2nd ed. (pp. 88–114). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2013). Concepts of female sexual orientation. In Patterson, C. J. & D’Augelli, A. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and sexual orientation (pp. 3–17). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2016). Sexual fluidity in male and females. Current Sexual Health Reports, 8(4), 249–256.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2021). The new genetic evidence on same-gender sexuality: Implications for sexual fluidity and multiple forms of sexual diversity. Journal of Sex Research, 58, 1–20.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M., & Alley, J. (2019). Was it good for her? An alternative perspective on life history theory, female same-sex sexuality, and pleasure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(5), 1315–1320.Google Scholar
Dickenson, J. A., Diamond, L., King, J. B., Jenson, K., & Anderson, J. S. (2020). Understanding heterosexual women’s erotic flexibility: The role of attention in sexual evaluations and neural responses to sexual stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15, 447–465.Google Scholar
Fethers, K., Marks, C., Mindel, A., & Estcourt, C. S. (2000). Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviours in women who have sex with women. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 76, 345–349.Google Scholar
Fetner, T. (2016). US attitudes toward lesbian and gay people are better than ever. Contexts, 15(2), 20–27.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Vasquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., … & Jacobs, W. J. (2006). Consilience and Life History Theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, C. (2017). Testosterone rex: Myths of sex, science, and society. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Frederick, D. A., John, H. K. S., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a US national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 273–288.Google Scholar
Ganna, A., Verweij, K. J. H., Nivard, M. G., Maier, R., Wedow, R., Busch, A. S., … & Zietsch, B. P. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, R. S., Tanton, C., Erens, B., Clifton, S., Prah, P., Wellings, K., … & Mercer, C. H. (2018). Sexual identity, attraction and behaviour in Britain: The implications of using different dimensions of sexual orientation to estimate the size of sexual minority populations and inform public health interventions. PLOS ONE, 13(1), e0189607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 205, 581–598.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goy, R. W., & Goldfoot, D. A. (1975). Neuroendocrinology: Animal models and problems of human sexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 4, 405–420.Google Scholar
Greaves, L. M., Barlow, F. K., Huang, Y., Stronge, S., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Personality across sexual identity and gender in a national probability sample in New Zealand. Sex Roles, 77(9–10), 653–662.Google Scholar
Hamer, D., Mustanski, B., Sell, R., Sanders, S. A., & Garcia, J. R. (2021). Comment on “Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior.” Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2941Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (2016). Psychopathy, the PCL-R, and criminal justice: Some new findings and current issues. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 57(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83; discussion 83–135.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. (2012). Considering the role of conditioning in sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. (2017). Situating human sexual conditioning. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(8), 2213–2229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janicke, T., Häderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, M. J., & Anthes, N. (2016). Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Science Advances, 2(2), e1500983.Google Scholar
Jeffery, A. J., Shackelford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Vonk, J., & McDonald, M. (2018). The evolution of human female sexual orientation. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(1), 71–86.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Lalumière, M. L., Sawatsky, M. L., Dawson, S. J., & Suschinsky, K. D. (2020). The empirical status of the preparation hypothesis: Explicating women’s genital responses to sexual stimuli in the laboratory. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508–019-01599-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legate, N., & Rogge, R. D. (2019). Identifying basic classes of sexual orientation with latent profile analysis: Developing the multivariate sexual orientation classification system. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(5), 1403–1422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, D. M. G., Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Friends with benefits II: Mating activation in opposite-sex friendships as a function of sociosexual orientation and relationship status. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 622–628.Google Scholar
Lindley, L. L., Walsemann, K. M., & Carter, J. W. Jr. (2012). The association of sexual orientation measures with young adults’ health-related outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 102(6), 1177–1185.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. A. (2007). The relation between sex drive and sexual attraction to men and women: A cross-national study of heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 209–222.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. A. (2020). Personality, and sexual traits that distinguish heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual individuals: Are there two dimensions that underlie variations in sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(2), 607–622.Google Scholar
Luoto, S., Krams, I., & Rantala, M. J. (2019). A life history approach to the female sexual orientation spectrum: Evolution, development, causal mechanisms, and health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(5), 1273–1308.Google Scholar
Money, J. (1988). Gay, straight, and in-between: The sexology of erotic orientation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Morandini, J. S., Blaszczynski, A., & Dar-Nimrod, I. (2017). Who adopts queer and pansexual sexual identities? Journal of Sex Research, 54(7), 911–922.Google Scholar
Murray, S. O. (2000). Homosexualities. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019, Mar). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 221–229.Google Scholar
Norton, R. (1997). The myth of the modern homosexual. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Klaiber, P. (2020). HEXACO, Dark personalities, and Brunswik symmetry. European Journal of Personality, 34, 541–542.Google Scholar
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135.Google Scholar
Perales, F., Campbell, A. K., Everett, B. G., McNair, R., & Hughes, T. L. (2021). Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of identifying as mainly heterosexual: Stability and change across three cohorts of Australian women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508–021-02000-0Google Scholar
Persson, T. J., Ryder, A. G., & Pfaus, J. G. (2016). Comparing subjective ratings of sexual arousal and desire in partnered sexual activities from women of different sexual orientations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(6), 1391–1402.Google Scholar
Rahman, Q., Xu, Y., Lippa, R. A., & Vasey, P. L. (2019). Prevalence of sexual orientation across 28 nations and its association with gender equality, economic development, and individualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(2), 595–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, T. A. (2021). Our grandmothers’ legacy: Challenges faced by female ancestors leave traces in modern women’s same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508–020-01768-xGoogle Scholar
Safron, A., Klimaj, V., Sylva, D., Rosenthal, A. M., Li, M., Walter, M., & Bailey, J. M. (2018). Neural correlates of sexual orientation in heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual women. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 673.Google Scholar
Saini, A. (2017). Inferior: How science got women wrong and the new research that’s rewriting the story. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Savin-Williams, R. C. (2016). Sexual orientation: Categories or continuum? Commentary on Bailey et al. (2016). Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(2), 37–44.Google Scholar
Savin-Williams, R. C., & Vrangalova, Z. (2013). Mostly heterosexual as a distinct sexual orientation group: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Developmental Review, 33, 58–88.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2007). Sexual strategies across sexual orientations. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 18(2–3), 183–214.Google Scholar
Semenyna, S. W., Belu, C. F., Vasey, P. L., & Honey, P. L. (2017). Not straight and not straightforward: The relationships between sexual orientation, sociosexuality, and Dark Triad traits in women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 24–37.Google Scholar
Semenyna, S. W., Gómez Jiménez, F. R., VanderLaan, D. P., & Vasey, P. L. (2020). Inter-sexual mate competition in three cultures. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0236549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semenyna, S. W., Vasey, P. L., & Honey, P. L. (2019). Replicating the relationships between Dark Triad traits and female mate-competition tactics in undergraduate women. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 73–78.Google Scholar
Smuts, B. (1995). The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 6, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 137–168.Google Scholar
Stief, M. C., Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2014). Bisexuality is associated with elevated sexual sensation seeking, sexual curiosity, and sexual excitability. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 193–198.Google Scholar
Stillman, T. F., & Maner, J. K. (2009). A sharp eye for her SOI: Perception and misperception of female sociosexuality at zero acquaintance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 124–130.Google Scholar
Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2011). Prepared for anything? An investigation of female genital arousal in response to rape cues. Psychological Science, 22, 159–165.Google Scholar
Sylva, D., Safron, A., Rosenthal, A. M., Reber, P. J., Parrish, T. B., & Bailey, J. M. (2013). Neural correlates of sexual arousal in heterosexual and homosexual women and men. Hormones and Behavior, 64(4), 673–684.Google Scholar
Tavris, C. (1993). The mismeasure of woman. Feminism & Psychology, 3, 149–168.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., & Blake, A. B. (2020). Increased support for same-sex marriage in the US: Disentangling age, period, and cohort effects. Journal of Homosexuality, 68, 1774–1784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y., Wu, H., & Sun, Z. S. (2019). The biological basis of sexual orientation: How hormonal, genetic, and environmental factors influence to whom we are sexually attracted. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 55, 100798.Google Scholar
Wickler, W. (1967). Socio-sexual signals and their intra-specific imitation among primates. In Morris, D. (Ed.), Primate ethology (pp. 69–147). London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 289–322). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T. H., & Brym, R. (2019). Tolerance of homosexuality in 88 countries: Education, political freedom, and liberalism. Sociological Forum, 34(2), 501–521.Google Scholar
Zietsch, B., Morley, K., Shekar, S., Verweij, K., Keller, M., Macgregor, S., … & Martin, N. (2008). Genetic factors predisposing to homosexuality may increase mating success in heterosexuals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(6), 424–433.Google Scholar
Zucker, K. J. (2017). Epidemiology of gender dysphoria and transgender identity. Sex Health, 14(5), 404–411.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×