Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Ethics and Education
- The Cambridge Handbook of Ethics and Education
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Traditions in Ethics and Education
- 1 Ancient Chinese Ethics and Education
- 2 Ancient Greek and Roman Ethics and Education
- 3 Ubuntu Ethics and Education in Southern Africa
- 4 Ethical and Environmental Knowledge and Education
- 5 Ethics, Education, and the Inheritance of Abraham
- 6 Prioritizing Outcomes
- 7 Freedom and the Ethics of Educational Authority
- 8 Moral Education in the Virtues
- 9 The Ethics of Bildung and Liberal Education
- 10 American Pragmatism, Democratic Ethics, and Education
- 11 Radical Ethics
- 12 The Ethics of Phenomenology and Hermeneutics in Education
- 13 Feminist Ethics and the Contradictions of Gender
- 14 Postmodern/Poststructuralist Ethics and Education
- Part II Ethics and Education in Practice
- Part III Emerging Ethical Pathways and Frameworks
- Index
- References
6 - Prioritizing Outcomes
Utilitarian Ethics and Education
from Part I - Traditions in Ethics and Education
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 March 2024
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Ethics and Education
- The Cambridge Handbook of Ethics and Education
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Traditions in Ethics and Education
- 1 Ancient Chinese Ethics and Education
- 2 Ancient Greek and Roman Ethics and Education
- 3 Ubuntu Ethics and Education in Southern Africa
- 4 Ethical and Environmental Knowledge and Education
- 5 Ethics, Education, and the Inheritance of Abraham
- 6 Prioritizing Outcomes
- 7 Freedom and the Ethics of Educational Authority
- 8 Moral Education in the Virtues
- 9 The Ethics of Bildung and Liberal Education
- 10 American Pragmatism, Democratic Ethics, and Education
- 11 Radical Ethics
- 12 The Ethics of Phenomenology and Hermeneutics in Education
- 13 Feminist Ethics and the Contradictions of Gender
- 14 Postmodern/Poststructuralist Ethics and Education
- Part II Ethics and Education in Practice
- Part III Emerging Ethical Pathways and Frameworks
- Index
- References
Summary
The chapter discusses the influence of utilitarianism on education. It begins by introducing the core principles of utilitarianism. The chapter then argues that it is possible to distinguish between two major strands within the utilitarian view of education: one that focuses on promoting the happiness of each individual, and the other on enhancing the happiness of the greatest number by creating facilitating social conditions for it. Each of these two strands is separately examined. The chapter also maintains that the second strand had a lasting impact on education that finds its clearest current expression in the emphasis on education’s role in economic development. Finally, the chapter suggests that reviving certain traditional forms of utilitarianism has significant potential to improve education.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Ethics and Education , pp. 106 - 124Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Allen, Danielle. Education and Equality. Princeton, NJ: Institute for Advanced Study, 2014.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. “John Stuart Mill: Democracy as Sentimental Education.” In Philosophers on Education: Historical Perspectives, edited by Rorty, A. O., 333–351. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth Secor. “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living.” Ethics 102, no. 1 (1991): 4–26.Google Scholar
Ball, Stephen John “Labour, Learning and the Economy: A ‘Policy Sociology’ Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Education 29, no. 2 (1999): 195–206.Google Scholar
Baujard, Antoinette. Utilitarianism and Anti-Utilitarianism. Lyon: Groupe D’Analyse de Theorie Economique, 2013.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.Google Scholar
Biesta, Gert. Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Blanchflower, David G., and Oswald, Andrew J.. “Well-Being over Time in Britain and the USA.” Journal of Public Economics 88, nos. 7–8 (2004): 1359–1386.Google Scholar
Burston, Wyndham Hedley. James Mill on Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Bykvist, Krister. “Utilitarianism in the Twentieth Century.” In The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, edited by Eggleston, Ben and Miller, Dale, 103–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Capaldi, Nicholas. John Stuart Mill: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Crisp, Rorger. “Sidgwick and Utilitarianism in the Late Nineteenth Century.” In The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, edited by Eggleston, B. and Miller, D., 81–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Dineen, Katy. “Mary Wollstonecraft and Harriet Taylor Mill on Women, Education, and Gender Socialization.” In A History of Western Philosophy of Education in the Age of Enlightenment, edited by Gilead, T., 181–208. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.Google Scholar
Dishon, Gideon, and Gilead, Tal. “Adaptability and Its Discontents: 21st-Century Skills and the Preparation for an Unpredictable Future.” British Journal of Educational Studies 69, no. 4 (2021): 393–413.Google Scholar
Duraiappah, Anantha Kumar, Atteveldt, Nienke M., Borst, Gregoire, Bugden, Stephanie, Ergas, Oren, Gilead, Tal, et al. Reimagining Education: The International Science and Evidence Based Education Assessment. UNESCO, MGIEP, 2022. Online.Google Scholar
Frijters, Paul, Clark, Andrew E., Krekel, Christian, and Layard, Richard. “A Happy Choice: Wellbeing as the Goal of Government.” Behavioural Public Policy 4, no. 2 (2020): 126–165.Google Scholar
Gilead, Tal. “Introduction: Enlightenment and Education.” In A History of Western Philosophy of Education in the Age of Enlightenment, edited by Gilead, Tal, 1–44. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.Google Scholar
Gilead, Tal. “The Provenances of Economic Theory’s Impact on Education: French Educational Thought at the End of the Ancien Régime.” Educational Theory 61, no. 1 (2011): 55–73.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert. E. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hans, Nicholas. “Bentham and the Utilitarians.” In Pioneers of English Education, edited by Judges, A. V., 83–103. London: Faber and Faber, 1954.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. Morality within the Limits of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard Mervyn. “Utilitarianism and Moral Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 11, no. 3 (1992): 197–205.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel, McPherson, Michael, and Satz, Deborah. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Itzkin, Elissa S. “Bentham’s Chrestomathia: Utilitarian Legacy to English Education.” Journal of the History of Ideas 39, no. 2 (1978): 303–316.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. “Mill, Education, and the Good Life.” In John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life, edited by Eggleston, Ben, Miller, David, and Weinstein, David, 192–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Knoll, Michael. “From Kidd to Dewey: The Origin and Meaning of ‘Social Efficiency.’” Journal of Curriculum Studies 41, no. 3 (2009): 361–391.Google Scholar
Labaree, David F. “How Dewey Lost: The Victory of David Snedden and Social Efficiency in the Reform of American Education.” In Pragmatism and Modernities, edited by Throler, Daniel, Schlag, Thomas, and Osterwalder, Fritz, 163–188. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Layard, Peter, and Grenville, Richard. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin, 2011.Google Scholar
Levy, Sanford S. “Moral Education: An Act-Utilitarian View.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 10, no. 2 (1990): 165–174.Google Scholar
Little, I. M. D. Ethics, Economics, and Politics: Principles of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. In the Interest of the Governed: A Study in Bentham’s Philosophy of Utility and Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Marginson, Simon. “Limitations of Human Capital Theory.” Studies in Higher Education 44, no. 2 (2019): 287–301.Google Scholar
Mesquita, Leopoldo. “The Lancasterian Monitorial System as an Education Industry with a Logic of Capitalist Valorisation.” Paedagogica Historica 48, no. 5 (2012): 661–675.Google Scholar
Mill, J. “Education.” In James Mill on Education, edited by Burston, W. H., 41–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter. “Factories, Monitorial Schools and Jeremy Bentham: The Origins of the ‘Management Syndrome’ in Popular Education.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 5, no. 2 (1973): 10–20.Google Scholar
Mongin, Philippe, and d’Aspremont, Claude. “Utility Theory and Ethics.” In Handbook of Utility Theory, edited by Salvador, Barbera, Hammond, Peter, and Seidl, Christian, vol. 1: 371–481. Boston: Kluwer, 1998.Google Scholar
Ng, Yew Kwang. “From Preference to Happiness: Towards a More Complete Welfare Economics.” Social Choice and Welfare 20, no. 2 (2003): 307–350.Google Scholar
OECD. “The Future We Want.” In The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD Press, 2018.Google Scholar
OECD. OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
OECD. OECD Skills Strategy 2019: Skills to Shape a Better Future. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.Google Scholar
Philipsen, Dirk. The Little Big Number: How GDP Came to Rule the World and What to Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rosen, Frederick. Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, Pasi. “The Fourth Way of Finland.” Journal of Educational Change 12, no. 2 (2011): 173–185.Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome Borges. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip. Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, and Williams, Bernard. “Introduction: Utilitarianism and Beyond.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter., “Twenty Questions.” Journal of Practical Ethics 4, no. 2 (2016): 67–78.Google Scholar
Smart, John, Jamieson, Carswell, and Williams, Bernard. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph Eugene, Sen, Amartya, and Fitoussi, Jean Paul. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (2009).Google Scholar
Taylor, Brian. “A Note in Response to Itzkin’s ‘Bentham’s Chrestomathia.’” Journal of the History of Ideas 43, no. 2 (1982): 309–313.Google Scholar
White, John. Exploring Well-Being in Schools: A Guide to Making Children’s Lives More Fulfilling. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
White, Ralph. “The Anatomy of a Victorian Debate: An Essay in the History of Liberal Education.” British Journal of Educational Studies 34, no. 1 (1986): 38–65.Google Scholar