Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T22:36:22.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Politics, Power, State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

Edited by
Katharine Legun ,
Julie C. Keller ,
Michael Carolan  and
Michael M. Bell
Katharine Legun
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands
Julie C. Keller
Affiliation:
University of Rhode Island
Michael Carolan
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Michael M. Bell
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology , pp. 283 - 396
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abrahamsky, K. 2012, “Energy and social reproduction,” The Commoner, 15: 337–52.Google Scholar
Baker, L. 2015, The political economy of decarbonisation: Exploring the dynamics of South Africa’s electricity sector. Cape Town: Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. 2014, Blue Gold: The fight to stop the corporate theft of the world’s water. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. 2015, “Paradigm dressed as epoch,” Environmental Values, 24 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Bennie, A. 2010, “The relation between environmental protection and ‘development’: A case study of the social dynamics involved in the proposed mining at Xolobeni, Wild Coast.” MA thesis, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Bennie, A. 2017, “Ways to resist: Amadiba agriculture challenges elite mining agenda,” Daily Maverick, 20 July.Google Scholar
Brissette, E. 2016, “From competent citizen to potential prey: State imaginaries and subjectivities in US War Resistance,” Critical Sociology, 42 (7–8): 1163–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, P. 2017, “Climate debt, community resistance and conservation alliances against Kwa-Zulu-Natal coal mining at Africa’s oldest nature reserve.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Carolan, M., 2016, “Adventurous Food Futures,” Agriculture and Human Values, 33: 141–52.Google Scholar
Cock, J. 2018, Writing the ancestral river: The story of the Kowie. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Cousins, B. and Walker, C.(eds) 2015, Land divided land restored. Johannesburg: Jacana.Google Scholar
Davis, D. 2013, Imperialism, orientalism and the environment in the Middle East: History, policy, power and practice. In Davis, Diana and Burk, Edmond (eds), Environmental Imaginaries of the Middle East and North Africa, pp. 1–21. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Death, C. 2014, “Environmental movements, climate change and consumption in South Africa,” Journal of Southern African Studies, 40 (6): 1215–34.Google Scholar
De Toqueville, A. 1946, Democracy in America. New York: Alfred A. Knoph.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. 1996, Elements for a poststructural political ecology. In Peet and Watts (eds) pp. 46–68.Google Scholar
Fioramonti, L., 2017, Wellbeing economy. Johannesburg: Pan Macmillan South Africa.Google Scholar
Fraser, M. 2006, Re-thinking growth. Mail and Guardian June 2.Google Scholar
George, S., 2010, Whose crisis? Whose future? Amsterdam. Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Hansen, Thomas, and Stepputat, Finn (eds) 2001, States of imagination: Ethnographic explorations of the postcolonial state. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hermanssen, K., 2015, “Impact of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act on levels of mining, land utility and people.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Hallowes, D., 2002, Toxic Futures: South Africa in the crises of energy, environment and capital. Scottsville: University of Kwa-Zulu Natal Press.Google Scholar
Kaspar, D., 2016, “Re-conceptualizing (environmental) sociology,” Environmental Sociology, 2 (4): 32–42.Google Scholar
Krog, A. 2013, Body bereft. Johannesburg: Jacana.Google Scholar
Masie, D., and Bond, P. 2018, Eco-capitalist crises in the “Blue Economy” in Vishwas, Satgar (ed), Climate crises and just transitions: Democratic eco-socialist alternatives for South Africa and the world. Johannesburg: Wits University Press, pp. 314–17.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T., 2002, Rule of Experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Molewa, E. 2008. “Trouble at Xolobeni.” Sunday Tribune 17 August.Google Scholar
National Planning Commission, 2012, National Development Plan 2030. Pretoria: Government PrinterGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Growth and Development (OECD), 2017, Organisation for Economic Growth and Development Report, “Reducing Carbon Emissions” May 2017.Google Scholar
Oelshlaeger, M., 1991, The Idea of wilderness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Peet, R. and Watts, M. (eds) 1996, Liberation Ecologies: environment, development, social movements. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Size, J, and London, J., 2008, “Environmental justice at the crossroads,” Sociology Compass, 2(4): 1331–54.Google Scholar
Stats SA. 2017, South African Demographic and Health Survey, 2016. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Stats SA. 2014, Household Income Survey, 2014. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Sweeney, S., 2012, Resist, reclaim, restructure: The union’s struggle for energy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Global Labour Institute.Google Scholar
Swilling, M., Borat, H., Buthelezi, M., Chipkin, I., et al., 2017, Betrayal of the promise: How South Africa is being stolen, An SCRP report. Cape Town, Stellenbosch, Johannesburg: State Capacity Research Project.Google Scholar
Walker, C. 2008, Landmarked: Land claims and land restitution in South Africa. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, C. 2013, Sketch Map to the future: Restitution unbound. In Walker, C. and Cousins, B. (eds) Land Divided, Land Restored. Johannesburg: Jacana.Google Scholar
Warner, R., 2010, “Ecological modernization theory: Towards a critical ecopolitics of change,” Environmental Politics, 19 (4): 538–56.Google Scholar
Wulf, Andrea, 2016, The invention of nature: The adventures of Alexander Von Humboldt. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

References

Bell, S., and Morse, S. (2003). Measuring Sustainability: Learning from Doing. London: Routledge Earthscan.Google Scholar
Berdegué, J., Balsevich, F., Flores, L., and Reardon, T. (2005). ‘Central American supermarkets’ private standards of quality and safety in procurement of fresh fruits and vegetables’, Food Policy, 30: 254–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, K., Legun, K., and Campbell, H. (2018). ‘Not defined by the numbers: distinction, dissent and democratic possibilities in debating the data’, in Forney, J., Rosin, C., and Campbell, H. (eds.), Agri-Environmental Governance as an Assemblage: Multiplicity, Power, and Transformation, 127–44. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Busch, L. (2000). ‘The moral economy of grades and standards’, Journal of Rural Studies, 16 (3): 273–83.Google Scholar
Busch, L. (2011). Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute for Technology Press.Google Scholar
Busch, L., and Tanaka, K. (1996). ‘Rites of passage: constructing quality in a commodity subsector’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21(1): 3–27.Google Scholar
Busch, L., and Bain, C. (2004). ‘New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system’, Rural Sociology, 69(3): 321–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, H., and Liepins, R. (2001). ‘Naming organics: understanding organic standards in New Zealand as a discursive field’, Sociologia Ruralis, 41(1): 21–39.Google Scholar
Campbell, H., and Stuart, A. M. (2005). ‘Disciplining the organic commodity’, in Higgins, V., and Lawrence, G. (eds.), Agricultural Governance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation, 84–97. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, H., Murcott, A., and Mackenzie, A. (2010). ‘Kosher in New York City, Halal in Aquitaine: challenging the relationship between neoliberalism and food auditing’, Agriculture and Human Values, 28(1): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, J., Bredahl, M., and Hooker, N. (1998). ‘How quality management metasystems are affecting the food industry’, Review of Agricultural Economics, 20(2): 547–57.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. H., and Rosin, C. (2014). ‘Absolving the sins of emission: the politics of regulating agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand’, Journal of Rural Studies, 36: 391–400.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. H. (2015). ‘Measure for measure? Commensuration, commodification, and metrology in emissions markets and beyond’, Environment and Planning A, 47(9): 1787–804.Google Scholar
Farina, E., and Reardon, T. (2000). ‘Agrifood grades and standards on the extended Mercosur: their role in the changing agrifood system’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(5): 1170–6.Google Scholar
Forney, J., Rosin, C., and Campbell, H. (eds). (2018). Agri-Environmental Governance as an Assemblage: Multiplicity, Power, and Transformation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fulponi, L. (2006). ‘Private voluntary standards in the food system: the perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries’, Food Policy, 31: 1–13.Google Scholar
Guthman, J. (1998). ‘Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: the codification of Californian organic agriculture’, Antipode, 30(2): 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthman, J. (2000). ‘Raising organic: an agro-ecological assessment of grower practices in California’, Agriculture and Human Values, 17(X): 257–66.Google Scholar
Guthman, J. (2004). Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hale, J., Legun, K. A., Campbell, H. and Carolan, M. (2019). ‘Social sustainability indicators as performance’, Geoforum, 103: 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., and Busch, L. (2005). ‘Third-party certification in the global agrifood system’, Food Policy, 30: 354–69.Google Scholar
Hatanaka, M., Konefal, J., and Constance, D. H. (2012). ‘A tripartite standards regime analysis of the contested development of a sustainable agriculture standard’, Agriculture and Human Values, 29(1): 65–78.Google Scholar
Hatanaka, M., and Konefal, J. (2013). ‘Legitimacy and standard development in multi-stakeholder initiatives: a case study of the Leonardo Academy’s Sustainable Agriculture Standard initiative’, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food, 20(2): 155–73.Google Scholar
Henry, M. (2017). ‘Meat, metrics and market devices: commensuration infrastructures and the assemblage of ‘the schedule’ in New Zealand’s red meat sector’, Journal of Rural Studies, 52: 100–9.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. (1983). ‘Standards as public, collective and private goods’, Kyklos, 36(3): 377–96.Google Scholar
Konefal, J., and Hatanaka, M. (2011). ‘Enacting third-party certification: a case study of science and politics in organic shrimp certification’, Journal of Rural Studies, 27(2): 125–33.Google Scholar
Krislov, S. (1997). How Nations Choose Product Standards and Standards Change Nations, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Larner, W. (2003). ‘Guest editorial: “neoliberalism?” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(5): 309–12.Google Scholar
Legun, K. A., and Sautier, M. (2018), ‘Sustainability programs and deliberative processes: assembling sustainable winegrowing in New Zealand’, Agriculture and Human Values, 35(4): 837–52.Google Scholar
Legun, K. A., and Henry, M. (2017). ‘Introduction to the special issue on the post-human turn in agri-food studies: thinking about things from the office to the page’, Journal of Rural Studies, 100(52): 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Heron, R. (2003). ‘Cr(eat)ing food futures: reflections on food governance issues in New Zealand’s agri-food sector’, Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1): 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Heron, R. (2005). ‘Re-constituting New Zealand’s agri-food chains for international competition’, in Pritchard, B., and Folds, N. (eds.), Cross-Continental Food Commodity Chains, 52–77. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mainville, D., Zylbersztajn, D., Farina, E., and Reardon, T. (2005). ‘Determinants of retailers’ decisions to use public or private grades and standards: Evidence from the fresh produce market of Sao Paulo, Brazil’, Food Policy, 30: 334–353.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. (2020). “Indirect” land grabbing, private certification and GlobalGAP’, in Bjorkhaug, H., McMichael, P., and Muirhead, B. (eds.), Finance or Food?: The Role of Cultures, Values, and Ethics in Land Use Negotiations, 80–107. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.Google Scholar
Mutersbaugh, T. (2005). ‘Fighting standards with standards: harmonization, rents, and social accountability in certified agrofood networks’, Environment and Planning A, 37(11), 2033–51.Google Scholar
Peck, J., and Tickell, A. (2002). ‘Neoliberalizing space’, Antipode, 34(3): 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reardon, T., Timmer, C., Barrett, C., and Berdegué, J. (2003). ‘The rise of supermarkets in Africa, Asia, and Latin America’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85 (5): 1140–6.Google Scholar
Rosin, C., Campbell, H., Hunt, L., and Stringer, C. (2007). ‘Audit me this! Orchard-level effects of the EurepGAP audit system on New Zealand kiwifruit producers’, in Stringer, C., and. Le Heron, R. (eds.), Agri-Food Commodity Chains and Globalising Networks, 61–74. Avebury: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Rosin, C. (2008). ‘The conventions of agri-environmental practice in New Zealand: farmers, retail driven audit schemes and a new spirit of farming’, GeoJournal, 73(1): 45–54.Google Scholar
Rosin, C., and Campbell, H. (2009). ‘Beyond bifurcation: examining the conventions of organic agriculture in New Zealand’, Journal of Rural Studies, 25(1): 35–47.Google Scholar
Rosin, C., Campbell, H., and Reid, J. (2017a). ‘Metrology and sustainability: using sustainability audits in New Zealand to elaborate the complex politics of measuring’, Journal of Rural Studies, 52: 90–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosin, C. J., Legun, K. A., Campbell, H., and Sautier, M. (2017b). ‘From compliance to co-production: emergent forms of agency in sustainable wine production in New Zealand’, Environment and Planning A, 49(12): 2780–99.Google Scholar
Sautier, M., Legun, K., Rosin, C., and Campbell, H. (2018). ‘Sustainability: a tool for governing wine production in New Zealand?’ Journal of Cleaner Production, 179: 347–56.Google Scholar
Shore, C., and Wright, S. (1999). ‘Audit culture and anthropology: neo-liberalism in British higher education’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5 (4): 557–75.Google Scholar
Shore, C., and Wright, S. (2000). ‘Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture in higher education’, in Strathern, M. (ed.), Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, 57–89. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (ed.) (2000). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Adams, W. M. (2004). Against Extinction, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649.Google Scholar
Ashwood, L., & MacTavish, K. (2016). Tyranny of the Majority and Rural Environmental Injustice. Journal of Rural Studies, 47(Part A), 271–277.Google Scholar
Bell, S. E. (2016). Fighting King Coal: The Challenges to Micromobilization in Central Appalachia, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. M. (2002). Beyond the Natural Resource and Environmental Sociology Divide: Insights from a Transdisciplinary Perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 15(3), 269–280.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking Community-Based Conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630.Google Scholar
Blaikie, P. M., & Muldavin, J. S. S. (2004). Upstream, Downstream, China, India: The Politics of Environment in the Himalayan Region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(3), 520–548.Google Scholar
Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., & West, P. C. (2002). Beyond the Square Wheel: Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of Biodiversity Conservation as Social and Political Process. Society & Natural Resources, 15(1), 41–64.Google Scholar
Brockington, D. (2002). Fortress Conservation: The Preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania, Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
Brockington, D., Duffy, R., & Igoe, J., eds., (2008). Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Bryant, R. L. (1999). A Political Ecology for Developing Countries? Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 43(1), 148–157.Google Scholar
Bunker, S. G., & Ciccantell, P. S. (2005). Globalization and the Race for Resources, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buscher, B. E. (2008). Conservation, Neoliberalism, and Social Science: A Critical Reflection on the SCB 2007 Annual Meeting in South Africa. Conservation Biology, 22, 229–231.Google Scholar
Buttel, F. H. (2002). Environmental Sociology and the Sociology of Natural Resources: Institutional Histories and Intellectual Legacies. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 205–211.Google Scholar
Clement, F., & Amezaga, J. M. (2008). Linking Reforestation Policies with Land Use Change in Northern Vietnam: Why Local Factors Matter. Geoforum, 39(1), 265–277.Google Scholar
Coronil, F. (1997). The Magical State: Nature, Money, and Modernity in Venezuela, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coronil, F. (2001). Smelling Like a Market. The American Historical Review, 106(1), 119–129.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. (1995). The Trouble with Wilderness, or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature. In Cronon, W., ed., Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature, New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (2006). Planet of Slums, London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, M. (2012). Stealing Shining Rivers: Agrarian conflict, Market logic, and Conservation in a Mexican Forest, Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Dokshin, F. A. (2016). Whose Backyard and What’s at Issue? Spatial and Ideological Dynamics of Local Opposition to Fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013. American Sociological Review, 81(5), 921–948.Google Scholar
Dove, M. R. (2006). Indigenous People and Environmental Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 191–208.Google Scholar
Dressler, W., & Roth, R. (2011). The Good, the Bad, and the Contradictory: Neoliberal Conservation Governance in Rural Southeast Asia. World Development, 39(5), 851–862.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J., Hunold, C., Schlosberg, D., Downes, D., & Hernes, H. (2002). Environmental Transformation of the State: The USA, Norway, Germany and the UK. Political Studies, 50(4), 659–682.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. R., & Clement, M. T. (2017). Natural Hazards and Local Development: The Successive Nature of Landscape Transformation in the United States. Social Forces, 96(2), 851–876.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. R., & Frickel, S. (2013). The Historical Nature of Cities: A Study of Urbanization and Hazardous Waste Accumulation. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 521–543.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (1998). Whose Knowledge, Whose Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements. Journal of Political Ecology, 5, 53–82.Google Scholar
Fairhead, J., & Leach, M. (1996). Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 237–261.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. R. (2013). Understanding the Relationship between Subnational and National Climate Change Politics in the United States: Toward a Theory of Boomerang Federalism. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 769–784.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., Büscher, B., & Anderson, Z. R. (2016). Questioning REDD+ and the Future of Market-Based Conservation. Conservation Biology, 30 (3): 673–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenburg, W. R. (2005). Privileged Access, Privileged Accounts: Toward a Socially Structured Theory of Resources and Discourses. Social Forces, 84(1), 89–114.Google Scholar
Geisler, C. (2003). A New Kind of trouble: Evictions in Eden. International Social Science Journal, 55(175), 69–78.Google Scholar
Grant, D., Jorgenson, A. K., & Longhofer, W. (2018). Pathways to Carbon Pollution: The Interactive Effects of Global, Political, and Organizational Factors on Power Plants’ CO2 Emissions. Sociological Science, 5, 58–92.Google Scholar
Hall, D., Hirsch, P., & Li, T. M. (2011). Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. L. (2011). Pesticide Drift and the Pursuit of Environmental Justice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://lib.myilibrary.com/detail.asp?ID=334369Google Scholar
Hathaway, M. J. (2014). Transnational Matsutake Governance: Endangered Species, Contamination, and the Reemergence of Global Commodity Chains. In Yeh, E. T. & Coggins, C. R., eds., Mapping Shangrila: Nature, Personhood and Polity in the Sino–Tibetan Borderlands, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, pp. 153–173.Google Scholar
Hooks, G., & Smith, C. L. (2004). The Treadmill of Destruction: National Sacrifice Areas and Native Americans. American Sociological Review, 69(4), 558–575.Google Scholar
Hunsberger, C., & Alonso-Fradejas, A. (2016). The Discursive Flexibility of “Flex Crops”: Comparing Oil Palm and Jatropha. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(1), 225–250.Google Scholar
Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. (2007). Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction. Conservation and Society, 5(4), 432–449.Google Scholar
Igoe, J., Neves, K., & Brockington, D. (2010). A Spectacular Eco-Tour around the Historic Bloc: Theorising the Convergence of Biodiversity Conservation and Capitalist Expansion. Antipode, 42(3), 486–512.Google Scholar
Jacoby, K. (2001). Crimes against Nature Squatters, Poachers, Thieves, and the Hidden History of American Conservation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. B. (2011). Conservation Practice as Primitive Accumulation. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 683–701.Google Scholar
Klooster, D. (2003). Forest Transitions in Mexico: Institutions and Forests in a Globalized Countryside. The Professional Geographer, 55(2), 227–237.Google Scholar
Kröger, M. (2016). The Political Economy of “Flex Trees”: A Preliminary Analysis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(4), 886–909.Google Scholar
Kull, C. A., Arnauld de Sartre, X., & Castro-Larrañaga, M. (2015). The Political Ecology of Ecosystem Services. Geoforum, 61, 122–134.Google Scholar
Li, T. M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Li, T. M. (2008). Contested Commodifications: Struggles over Nature in a National Park. In Nevins, J. & Peluso, N. L., eds., Taking Southeast Asia to Market: Commodities, Nature, and People in the Neoliberal Age, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 124–139.Google Scholar
Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mather, A. S. (1992). The Forest Transition. Area, 24(4), 367–379.Google Scholar
Mathews, A. S. (2011). Instituting Nature: Authority, Expertise, and Power in Mexican Forests, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://newcatalog.library.cornell.edu/catalog/7541488Google Scholar
McAfee, K., & Shapiro, E. N. (2010). Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico: Nature, Neoliberalism, Social Movements, and the State. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(3), 579–599.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (2005). Devolution in the Woods: Community Forestry as Hybrid Neoliberalism. Environment and Planning A, 37(6), 995–1014.Google Scholar
McElwee, P. D. (2012). Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? Geoforum, 43(3), 412–426.Google Scholar
Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E. F. (2011). Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 343–371.Google Scholar
Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. H. (2010). Reconciling Theory and Practice: An Alternative Conceptual Framework for Understanding Payments for Environmental Services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1202–1208.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. P. (2004). Moral and Discursive Geographies in the War for Biodiversity in Africa. Political Geography, 23(7), 813–837.Google Scholar
Nygren, A. (2000). Environmental Narratives on Protection and Production: Nature-based Conflicts in Rio San Juan, Nicaragua. Development and Change, 31(4), 807–830.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. (2015). Tradeoffs in Carbon Commodification: A Political Ecology of Common Property Forest Governance. Geoforum, 67, 64–77.Google Scholar
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G. (2005). Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America. World Development, 33(2), 237–253.Google Scholar
Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New Frontiers of Land Control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 667–681.Google Scholar
Peluso, N. L., & Vandergeest, P. (2001). Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The Journal of Asian Studies, 60(3), 761–812.Google Scholar
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Lima, E., Sandoval, C., & Herrera, L. D. (2014). Governance, Location and Avoided Deforestation from Protected Areas: Greater Restrictions Can Have Lower Impact, Due to Differences in Location. World Development, 55, 7–20.Google Scholar
Qin, H., Bent, E., Brock, C., … Ojewola, O. (2018). Fifteen Years after the Bellingham ISSRM: An Empirical Evaluation of Frederick Buttel’s Differentiating Criteria for Environmental and Resource Sociology. Rural Sociology, 83(1): 6–23.Google Scholar
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. (2000). The Practical Politics of Knowing: State Environmental Knowledge and Local Political Economy. Economic Geography, 76(2), 126–144.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. (2004). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction, 1st ed., Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. (2008). The State in Political Ecology: A Postcard to Political Geography from the Field. In The SAGE Handbook of Political Geography, edited by Cox, K. R., Low, M., and Robinson, J. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 205–218.Google Scholar
Robbins, P. (2012). Political ecology: A Critical Introduction, 2nd ed., Chichester, West Sussex: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rosa, E. A., & Machlis, G. E. (2002). It’s a Bad Thing to Make One Thing into Two: Disciplinary Distinctions as Trained Incapacities. Society & Natural Resources, 15(3), 251–261.Google Scholar
Rudel, T. K. (2005). Tropical Forests: Regional Paths of Destruction and Regeneration in the Late Twentieth Century, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rudel, T. K. (2009). How Do People Transform Landscapes? A Sociological Perspective on Suburban Sprawl and Tropical Deforestation. American Journal of Sociology, 115(1), 129–154.Google Scholar
Rudel, T. K. (2013). Defensive Environmentalists and the Dynamics of Global Reform, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rudel, T. K., Coomes, O. T., Moran, E., … Lambin, E. (2005). Forest Transitions: Towards a Global Understanding of Land Use Change. Global Environmental Change, 15(1), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shandra, J. M., Rademacher, H., & Coburn, C. (2016). The World Bank and Organized Hypocrisy? A Cross-National Analysis of Structural Adjustment and Forest Loss. Environmental Sociology, 2(2), 192–207.Google Scholar
Shapiro-Garza, E. (2013). Contesting the Market-Based Nature of Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs: Four Sites of Articulation and Hybridization. Geoforum, 46, 5–15.Google Scholar
Shwom, R. L. (2011). A Middle Range Theorization of Energy Politics: The Struggle for Energy Efficient Appliances. Environmental Politics, 20(5), 705–726.Google Scholar
Sikor, T. (2012). Tree Plantations, Politics of Possession and the Absence of Land Grabs in Vietnam. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 1077–1101.Google Scholar
Trac, C. J., Schmidt, A. H., Harrell, S., & Hinckley, T. M. (2013). Is the Returning Farmland to Forest Program a Success? Three Case Studies from Sichuan. Environmental Practice, 15(03), 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. D. (2006). Shifting Scales, Lines, and Lives: The Politics of Conservation Science and Development in the Sahel. In Zimmerer, K. S., ed., Globalization and New Geographies of Conservation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 166–185.Google Scholar
Van Hecken, G., & Bastiaensen, J. (2010). Payments for Ecosystem Services in Nicaragua: Do Market-based Approaches Work? Development and Change, 41(3), 421–444.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, H. (2011). Climate Change, Conflict and Development in Sudan: Global Neo-Malthusian Narratives and Local Power Struggles. Development and Change, 42(3), 679–707.Google Scholar
Watts, M. (2004). Violent Environments: Petroleum Conflict and The Political Ecology of Rule in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. In Peet, R. & Watts, M., eds., Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, 2nd ed, London: Routledge, pp. 250–272.Google Scholar
White, B Jr, S. M. B., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012). The New Enclosures: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Land Deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 619–647.Google Scholar
White, D. F., Rudy, A. P., & Gareau, P. C. (2016). Environments, Natures and Social Theory: Towards a Critical Hybridity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wolford, W., Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & White, B. (2013). Governing Global Land Deals: The Role of the State in the Rush for Land. Development and Change, 44(2), 189–210.Google Scholar
Woodworth, M. (2017). Disposable Ordos: Mining, Urban Growth, and the Development of China’s West from a Commodity Frontier Perspective. Geoforum, 78, 133–140.Google Scholar
Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts, Jakarta, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
Yeh, E. T. (2009). Greening Western China: A Critical View. Geoforum, 40, 884–894.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Zinda, J. A., & Li, W. (2017). Forest Transitions in Chinese Villages: Explaining Community-Level Variation under the Returning Farmland to Forest Program. Land Use Policy, 64, 245–257.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S., Galt, R. E., & Buck, M. V. (2004). Globalization and Multi-Spatial Trends in the Coverage of Protected-Area Conservation (1980–2000). Ambio, 33(8), 520–529.Google Scholar
Zinda, J. A. (2017). Tourism Dynamos: Selective Commodification and Developmental Conservation in China’s Protected Areas. Geoforum, 78, 141–152.Google Scholar
Zinda, J. A., Trac, C. J., Zhai, D., & Harrell, S. (2017). Dual-Function Forests in the Returning Farmland to Forest Program and the Flexibility of Environmental Policy in China. Geoforum, 78, 119–132.Google Scholar
Zinda, J. A. & Zhang, Zhiming. (2018). Stabilizing Forests and Communities: Accommodative Buffering within China’s Collective Forest Tenure Reform. The China Quarterly, 235: 828–848.Google Scholar

References

Alberta Tar Sands Industry Group. 2015. Quarterly Update: Spring 2015. https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/b70a79b3-387f-475a-be38-6fe4cd5bb007/resource/5fd600ff-ce99-41e3-8235-8eb6bcbe414d/download/2614198-2015-sring-aosid-quarterlyupdate.pdf .Google Scholar
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., et al. 2011. “Has the Earth’s Sixth Mass Extinction Already Arrived?” Nature 471(7336): 51–57.Google Scholar
Barrett, K. L., Lynch, M. J., Long, M. A. and Stretesky, P. B.. 2018. “Monetary Penalties and Noncompliance with Environmental Laws: A Mediation Analysis.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 43: 530–550. DOI:10.1007/s12103-017-9428-0.Google Scholar
Beirne, P. 2009. Confronting Animal Abuse: Law, Criminology, and Human–Animal Relationships. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Beirne, P. 2007. “Rethinking Bestiality: Towards a Concept of Interspecies Sexual Assault.” Theoretical Criminology 1(3): 317–340.Google Scholar
Beirne, P. 1999. “For a Nonspeciesist Criminology: Animal Abuse as an Object of Study.” Criminology 37(1): 117–148.Google Scholar
BirdLife, 2017. “Falco Cherrug. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017.” Available from: www.iucnredlist.org/details/22696495/1Google Scholar
Bisschop, L. 2012. “Is It All Going to Waste? Illegal Transports of e-Waste in a European Trade Hub.” Crime, Law and Social Change 58(3): 221–249.Google Scholar
Brisman, A., and South, N.. 2013. “A Green-Cultural Criminology: An Exploratory Outline.” Crime, Media, Culture 9(2): 115–135.Google Scholar
Brulle, R. J., Turner, L., Carmichael, J. and Jenkins, J.. 2007. “Measuring Social Movement Organization Populations: A Comprehensive Census of US Environmental Movement Organizations.” Mobilization 12(3): 255–270.Google Scholar
Bunker, S. G. 1985. Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, unequal exchange, and the failure of the modern state. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carrington, K., Hogg, R. and McIntosh, A.. 2011. “The Resource Boom’s Underbelly: Criminological Impacts of Mining Development.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 44 (3): 335–354.Google Scholar
Chavko, J. 2010. “Trend and Conservation of Saker Falcon (falco cherrug) Population in Western Slovakia between 1976 and 2010.” Slovak Raptor Journal 4: 1–22.Google Scholar
Chen, B., Luo, J., and Hendryx, M.. 2015. “Zinc Compound Air Releases from Toxics Release Inventory Facilities and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Rates.” Environmental Research 142: 96–103.Google Scholar
Clark, B., and Foster, J. B.. 2009. “Ecological Imperialism and the Global Metabolic Rift: Unequal Exchange and the Guano/Nitrates Trade.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50 (3–4): 311–334.Google Scholar
Clark, R. V., and Rolf, A., 2013. “Poaching, Habitat Loss and the Decline of Neotropical Parrots: A Comparative Spatial Analysis.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 9: 333–353.Google Scholar
Dixon, A., Ragyov, D., Ayas, Z., et al. 2009. “Population Status of Breeding Sake Falcons (Falco cherrug) in Turkey.” Avian Biology Research. 2: 213–220.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B. 1992. “The Absolute General Law of Environmental Degradation Under Capitalism.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 3(3): 77–81.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B. 2000. Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, J. B, Clark, B. and York, R.. 2010. The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on the Earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, W. 1992. “Addictive Economies: Extractive Industries and Vulnerable Localities in a Changing World Economy.” Rural Sociology 57(3): 305–332.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, W. 1984. “Boomtown’s Youth: The Differential Impacts of Rapid Community Growth on Adolescents and Adults.” American Sociological Review 49(5): 697–705.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, W. 1979. “An Ounce of Prevention: Another Approach to Mitigating the Human Problems of Boomtowns,” pp. 55–62 in United States Civil Rights Commission (ed.) Energy Resource Development: Implications for Women and Minorities in the Intermountain West. United States Civil Rights Commission, Rocky Mountain Region. Washington, DC: USGAO.Google Scholar
Gould, K. A., Pellow, D. N. and Schnaibert, A.. 2008. The Treadmill of Production: Injustice and Unsustainability in the Global Economy. Boulder, CO: ParadigmGoogle Scholar
Hendryx, M., and Entwhistle, J.. 2015. “Association between Residence near Surface Coal Mining and Blood Inflammation.” The Extractive Industries and Society 2 (2): 246–251.Google Scholar
Hendryx, M., and Luo, J.. 2017. “Children’s Environmental Chemical Exposures in the USA, NHANES 2003–2012.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (6): 5336–5343.Google Scholar
Hendryx, M., and Luo, J.. 2015. “An Examination of the Effects of Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining on Respiratory Symptoms and COPD Using Propensity Scores.” International Journal of Environmental Health Research 25 (3): 265–276.Google Scholar
Hendryx, M., and Luo, J.. 2013. “Cancer Hospitalizations in Rural–Urban Areas in Relation to Carcinogenic Discharges from Toxics Release Inventory Facilities.” International Journal of Environmental Health Research 23 (2): 155–169.Google Scholar
Hendryx, M., Luo, J., and Chen, B. 2014. “Total and Cardiovascular Mortality Rates in Relation to Discharges from Toxics Release Inventory Sites in the United States.” Environmental Research 133: 36–41.Google Scholar
Hillyard, P., and Tombs, S.. 2007. “From Crime to Social Harm?” Crime, Law and Social Change 48(1): 9–25.Google Scholar
Hornborg, A. 2012. Global Ecology and Unequal Exchange: Fetishism in a Zero-Sum World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jarrell, M. L., Lynch, M. J. and Stretesky, P. B.. 2013. “Green Criminology and Green Victimization,” pp.423–444 in Arrigo, B. and Bersot, H. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of International Crime and Justice Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K. 2012. “The Sociology of Ecologically Unequal Exchange and Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 1960–2005.” Social Science Research 41 (2): 242–252.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K. 2011. “Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Central and Eastern European Nations, 1992–2005: A Test of Ecologically Unequal Exchange Theory.” Human Ecology Review 18 (2): 105–114.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K. 2010. “World-Economic Integration, Supply Depots, And Environmental Degradation: A Study of Ecologically Unequal Exchange, Foreign Investment Dependence, And Deforestation in Less Developed Countries.” Critical Sociology 36 (3): 453–477.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K. 2009. “The Sociology of Unequal Exchange in Ecological Context: A Panel Study of Lower‐Income Countries, 1975–2000.” Sociological Forum, 24 (1): 22–46.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K. 2006. “Unequal Ecological Exchange and Environmental Degradation: A Theoretical Proposition and Cross‐National Study of Deforestation, 1990–2000.” Rural Sociology 71 (4): 685–712.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K., Austin, K. and Dick, C.. 2009. “Ecologically Unequal Exchange and the Resource Consumption/Environmental Degradation Paradox: A Panel Study of Less-Developed Countries, 1970–2000.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50 (3–4): 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K., and Clark, B.. 2009. “The Economy, Military, and Ecologically Unequal Exchange Relationships in Comparative Perspective: A Panel Study of The Ecological Footprints Of Nations, 1975–2000.” Social Problems 56 (4): 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K., Dick, C. and Austin, K.. 2009. “The Vertical Flow of Primary Sector Exports and Deforestation in Less-Developed Countries: A Test of Ecologically Unequal Exchange Theory.” Society and Natural Resources 23 (9): 888–897.Google Scholar
Long, M. A., Lynch, M. J. and Stretesky, P. B.. 2018. “The Great Recession, the Treadmill of Production and Ecological Disorganization: Did the Recession Decrease Toxic Releases Across US States, 2005–2014?” Ecological Economics 146: 184–192.Google Scholar
Long, M. A., Stretesky, P. B. and Lynch, M. J.. 2017. “Foreign Direct Investment, Ecological Withdrawals and Natural Resource Dependent Economies.” Society and Natural Resources 30(10): 1261–1276.Google Scholar
Long, M.A., Stretesky, P. B. and Lynch, M. J.. 2014. “The Treadmill of Production, Planetary Boundaries, and Green Criminology,” pp.263–275 in Spapens, Toine, Kluin, Marieke and White, Rob (eds.) Environmental Crime and its Victims: Perspectives within Green Criminology. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Long, M. A., Stretesky, P. B., Lynch, M. J. and Fenwick, E.. 2012. “Crime in the Coal Industry: Implications for Green Criminology and Treadmill of Production.” Organization & Environment 25(3): 328–346.Google Scholar
Luo, J., Hendryx, M. and Ducatman., A. 2011. Association between Six Environmental Chemicals and Lung Cancer Incidence in The United States. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, ID # 463701. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/463701Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J. 2017. “Conceptualizing Green Victimization, Green Criminology and Political Economy.” Critical Sociology 43 (3): 473–478.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J. 2016a. “Green Criminology and Social Justice: A Reexamination of the Lynemouth Plant Closing and the Political Economic Causes of Environmental and Social Injustice.” Critical Sociology 43 (3): 449–464.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J. 2016b. “A Marxian Interpretation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Global Capitalism and the Rise, Fall (and Rise) of Pollution.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 27 (4): 77–95.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J. 2016c. “The Ecological Distribution of Community Advantage and Disadvantage: Power Structures, Political Economy, Communities, Crime and Justice.” Critical Criminology 24, 2: 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. J. 2013. “Reflecting on Green Criminology and its Boundaries: Comparing Environmental and Criminal Victimization and Considering Crime from an Eco-city Perspective,” pp. 43–57 in South, N. and Brismans, A. (eds.) The Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J. 2012. Evidence of Widespread Green Victimization and the Treadmill of Production: Areas of Concern Uniting Radical Criminology, Green Criminology and the Political Economy of Environmental Crime. The Critical Criminologist Blog. http://studylib.net/doc/8951221/evidence-of-widespread-green-victimizationGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. J. 1990. “The Greening of Criminology: A Perspective on the 1990s.” The Critical Criminologist 2(3): 3–12.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., and Barrett, K. L.. (2015). “Death Matters: Victimization by Particle Matter from Coal Fired Power Plants in the US, a Green Criminological View.” Critical Criminology 23 (3): 219–234.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Barrett, K. L., Stretesky, P. B., and Long, M. A.. 2016. “The Weak Probability of Punishment for Environmental Offenses and Deterrence of Environmental Offenders: A Discussion Based on USEPA Criminal Cases, 1983–2013.” Deviant Behavior 37(10): 1095–1109.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., and Boggess, L. N.. 2015. “Ecocities, Crime and Justice: The Implication of Ecocity Theory for Social Disorganization Theory and Green Criminology.” Sociological Spectrum. 35: 309–328.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Long, M. A., Barrett, K. L. and Stretesky, P. B.. 2013. “Is It a Crime to Produce Ecological Disorganization? Why Green Criminology and Political Economy Matter in the Analysis of Global Ecological Harms.” British Journal of Criminology 53(6): 997–1016.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Long, M. A. and Stretesky, P. B.. 2015. “Anthropogenic Development Drives Species to be Endangered: Capitalism and the Decline of Species,” pp. 117–146 in Sollund, Ragnhild (ed.) Green Harms and Crimes: Critical Criminology in a Changing World. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Long, M.A., Stretesky, P. B. and Barrett, K. L.. 2017. Green Criminology: Crime, Justice, and the Environment. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M.J., and Stretesky, P. B.. 2013. “The Distribution of Water-Monitoring Organizations across States: Implications for Community Environmental Policing and Social Justice.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 36 (1): 6–26.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., and Stretesky, P. B.. 2012. “Native Americans, Social and Environmental Justice: Implications for Criminology.” Social Justice 38 (3): 34–54.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J. and Stretesky, P. B.. 2010. “Global Warming, Global Crime: A Green Criminological Analysis,” pp. 62–86 in White, R. (ed.) Global Environmental Harm and the Greening of Criminology. London: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B. and Burns, R. G.. 2004a. “Determinants of Environmental Law Violation Fines Against Oil Refineries: Race, Ethnicity, Income and Aggregation Effects.” Society and Natural Resources 17 (4): 333–347.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B. and Burns, R. G.. 2004b. “Slippery Business: Race, Class and Legal Determinants of Penalties Against Petroleum Refineries.” Journal of Black Studies 34 (3): 421–440.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B. and Long, M. A.. 2020. “The Treadmill of Production and the Treadmill of Law: Propositions for Analyzing Law, Ecological Disorganization and Crime.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 31(1): 107–122.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B. and Long, M. A.. 2017. “Blaming the Poor for Biodiversity Loss: A Political Economic Critique of the Study of Poaching and Wildlife Trafficking.” Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 25(3): 263–275.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B. and Long, M.A.. 2016. “A Proposal for the Political Economy of Green Criminology: Capitalism and the Case of the Alberta Tar Sands.” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 58(2): 137–160.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B. and Long, M. A.. 2015a. Defining Crime: A Critique of the Concept and Its Application. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B. and Long, M. A.. 2015b. Environmental Justice: A Criminological Perspective. Environmental Research Letters 10: 085008.Google Scholar
Nurse, A. 2013. Animal Harm: Perspectives on Why People Harm and Kill Animals. Oxon, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. R. 1998. Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Quinney, R. 1970. The Social Reality of Crime. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Pires, S. F. 2015. “A CRAVED Analysis of Multiple Illicit Parrot Markets in Peru and Bolivia.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 21(3): 321–336.Google Scholar
Pires, S. F., and Clarke, R. V.. 2011. “Sequential Foraging, Itinerant Fences and Parrot Poaching in Bolivia.” British Journal of Criminology 51(2): 314–335.Google Scholar
Rice, J. 2007. “Ecological Unequal Exchange: Consumption, Equity, and Unsustainable Structural Relationships within the Global Economy.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48(1): 43–72.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., et al. 2009a. “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature 461(24): 472–475.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., et al. 2009b. “Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Ecology and Society 14(2): 32.Google Scholar
Ruddell, R., Jayasundara, D. S., Mayzer, R. and Heitkamp, T.. 2014. “Drilling Down: An Examination of the Boom-Crime Relationship in Resource-Based Boom Counties.” Western Criminology Review 15(1): 3–17Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. and Groves, W. B.. 1989. “Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 94(4): 774–802.Google Scholar
Schnaiberg, A. 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schnaiberg, A. and Gould, K. A.. 2000. Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.Google Scholar
Sollund, R. 2013. “Animal Trafficking and Trade: Abuse and Species Injustice,” pp.72–92 in Walters, R., Westerhuis, D. and Wyatt, T. (eds.) Emerging Issues in Green Criminology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sollund, R. 2011. “Expressions of Speciesism: The Effects of Keeping Companion Animals on Animal Abuse, Animal Trafficking and Species Decline.” Crime, Law and Social Change 55(5): 437–451.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. R. and McKay, H. D.. 1942. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. and McNeill, J.. 2011. “The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369: 842–867.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. and McNeill, J.. 2007. “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature.” Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment 36(8): 614–621.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. and Hogan, M. J. 1998. “Environmental Justice: An Analysis of Superfund Sites in Florida.” Social Problems 45(2): 268–287.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., Long, M. A. and Lynch, M. J.. 2017a. “A Cross-National Study of the Association between Natural Resource Rents and Homicide Rates, 2000–12.” European Journal of Criminology 14(4): 393–414.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., Long, M. A. and Lynch, M. J.. 2017b. “Trends in the Formation of Environmental Enforcement International Non-Governmental Organizations, 1950–2010.” Globalizations 14(4): 627–642.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., Long, M. A. and Lynch, M. J.. 2013a. The Treadmill of Crime: Political Economy and Green Criminology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., Long, M. A. and Lynch, M. J.. 2013b. “Does Environmental Enforcement Slow the Treadmill of Production? The Relationship Between Large Money Penalties and Toxic Releases within Offending Corporations.” Journal of Crime and Justice 36(2): 233–247.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., Long, M. A., McKie, R. and Aryee, F.. (2018). Does Oil and Gas Development Increase Crime within UK Local Authorities? The Extractive Industries and Society 5: 356–365.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., and Lynch, M. J.. 2011. “Coal Strip Mining, Mountaintop Removal, and the Distribution of Environmental Violations across the United States, 2002–2008.” Landscape Research 36 (2): 209–230.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., and Lynch, M. J.. 2009a. “Does Self-Policing Reduce Chemical Emissions? A Further Test of the EPA Self Audit Policy.” Social Science Research 38 (1): 239–250.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., and Lynch, M. J.. 2009. “A Cross-National Study of the Association between Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Exports to the United States.” Social Science Research 38:239–250.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., and Lynch, M. J.. 2002. “Environmental Hazards and School Segregation in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1987–1999.” The Sociological Quarterly 43 (4): 553–573.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., and Lynch, M. J.. 1999. “Environmental Justice and the Prediction of Distance to Accidental Chemical Releases in Hillsborough County, Florida.” Social Science Quarterly 80 (4): 830–846.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., and Lynch, M. J.. 1998. “Corporate Environmental Violence and Racism.” Crime, Law and Social Change 30 (2): 163–184.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., Lynch, M. J., Long, M. A. and Barrett, K. L.. 2017. “Does the Modernization of Enforcement Reduce Toxic Releases? An Examination of Self-Policing, Criminal Prosecutions and Toxic Releases in the United States, 1988–2014.” Sociological Spectrum 37(1): 48–62.Google Scholar
Stretesky, P. B., McKie, R. E., Lynch, M. J., Long, M. A. and Barrett, K. L.. 2018. “Where Have All the Falcons Gone? Saker Falcon (Falco Cherrug) Exports in a Global Economy.” Global Ecology and Conservation 13 e00372 doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2017.e00372.Google Scholar
Walters, R. 2006. “Crime, Bio-Agriculture and the Exploitation of Hunger.” British Journal of Criminology 46(1): 26–45.Google Scholar
White, R. (ed.). 2012. Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
York, R. 2004. “The Treadmill of (Diversifying) Production.” Organization & Environment 17(3): 355–362.Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W. and Crutzen, P.. 2010. “The New World of the Anthropocene.” Environmental Science & Technology 44(7): 2228–2231.Google Scholar

References

Adam, B., Groves, G., 2011. Futures Tended: Care and Future-Oriented Responsibility. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 31, 17–27.Google Scholar
Beck, U., 1992. The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Brooks, S., Leach, M., Lucas, H., Millstone, E., 2009. Silver Bullets, Grand Challenges and the New Philanthropy. STEPS Working Paper 24, STEPS Centre, Brighton. Downloaded from www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/STEPSWorkingPaper24.pdf (26 September 2018).Google Scholar
Bush, V., 1945. Science – The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President. United States Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Calvert, J., 2013. Systems Biology: Big Science and Grand Challenges. BioSocieties 8, 466–79.Google Scholar
Chilvers, J., Kearnes, M. (eds.), 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Collingridge, D., 1980. The Social Control of Technology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
Douglas, H., 2003. The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists (Tensions Between Autonomy and Responsibility). American Philosophical Quarterly 40, 59–68.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D., 2004. The Linear Model Did Not Exist. In Grandin, K., Worms, N., Widmalm, S. (eds.), The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications. Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, MA, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
EPSRC. 2013. Framework for Responsible Innovation. Downloaded from https://epsrc.ukri.org/index.cfm/research/framework/ (26 September 2018).Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., 2000. The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy 29, 109–23.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2007. The European Research Area: New Perspectives. Green Paper 04.04.2007. Text with EEA relevance, COM161, EUR 22840 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2013. Fact Sheet: Science with and for Society in Horizon 2020. Downloaded from: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/FactSheet_Science_with_and_for_Society.pdf (26 September 2018).Google Scholar
Finkel, A., 2018. What Kind of Society Do We Want to Be? Keynote Address by Australian Government Chief Scientist, Human Rights Commission ‘Human Rights and Technology’ Conference, Four Seasons Hotel, Sydney. Downloaded from: www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Human-Rights-and-Technology.pdf (26 September 2018).Google Scholar
Flink, T., Kaldewey, D., 2018. The New Production of Legitimacy: STI Policy Discourses Beyond the Contract Metaphor. Research Policy 47, 14–22.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures 25, 739–55.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., et al. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Godin, B., 2006. The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Science, Technology & Human Values 31, 639–67.Google Scholar
Grinbaum, A., Groves, C., 2013. What Is ‘Responsible’ about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues. In Owen, R., Bessant, J., Heintz, M. (eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Wiley, London, pp. 119–42.Google Scholar
Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P., Mayer, S., Wynne, B., 1997. Uncertain World: Genetically Modified Organisms, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain. Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
Hajer, M., 2003. Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void. Policy Sciences 36, 175–95.Google Scholar
Hessels, L., van Lente, H., 2008. Re-Thinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda. Research Policy 37, 740–60.Google Scholar
Irvine, J., Martin, B., 1984. Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners. Pinter, London.Google Scholar
Irwin, A., 2006. The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance. Social Studies of Science 36, 299–330.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., 2003. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva 41, 223–44.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., (ed.) 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., 2016. The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. W. W. Norton and Co., New York.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., Simmet, H., 2017. No Funeral Bells: Public Reason in a ‘Post-Truth’ World. Social Studies of Science 47, 751–70.Google Scholar
Jump, P., 2014. ‘No Regrets’, Says Outgoing EPSRC Chief David Delpy: ‘Thick Skin’ Helped Research Council Boss Take the Flak for Controversial Shaping Capability Measures. Times Higher Education, 17 April 2014. Downloaded from: www.timeshighereducation.com/news/no-regrets-says-outgoing-epsrc-chief-david-delpy/2012694.article (26 September 2018).Google Scholar
Ludwig, D., Pols, A., Macnaghten, P., 2018. Organisational Review and Outlooks: Wageningen University and Research. In van der Molen, F., Consoli, L., Ludwig, D., Pols, A., Macnaghten, P. (eds.) Report from National Case Study: The Netherlands. Deliverable 9.1, Responsible Research and Innovation Project, pp. 29–54. Downloaded from: www.rri-practice.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/RRI-Practice_National_Case_Study_Report_NETHERLANDS.pdf (26 September 2018).Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P., 2004. Animals in Their Nature: A Case Study of Public Attitudes on Animals, Genetic Modification and ‘Nature’. Sociology 38, 533–51.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P., 2010. Researching Technoscientific Concerns in the Making: Narrative Structures, Public Responses and Emerging Nanotechnologies. Environment & Planning A 41, 23–37.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P., Chilvers, J., 2014. The Future of Science Governance: Publics, Policies, Practices. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy 32, 530–48.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P., Szerszynski, B., 2013. Living the Global Social Experiment: An Analysis of Public Discourse on Geoengineering and Its Implications for Governance. Global Environmental Change 23, 465–74.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P., Urry, J., 1995. Towards a Sociology of Nature. Sociology 29, 203–20.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P., Urry, J., 1998. Contested Natures. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P., Davies, S., Kearnes, M., 2015 online. Understanding Public Responses to Emerging Technologies: A Narrative Approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Policy. http://goo.gl/7mOfDvGoogle Scholar
Miller, C., 2004. Climate Science and the Making of a Global Social Order. In: Jasanoff, S. (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. Routledge, New York, pp. 247–85.Google Scholar
Merton, R., 1973. The Normative Structure of Science. In Storer, N. (ed.), The Sociology of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 267–78.Google Scholar
Murphy, J., Parry, S., Walls, J., 2016. The EPSRC’s Policy of Responsible Innovation from a Trading Zones Perspective. Minerva 54, 151–74.Google Scholar
National Council on Bioethics. 2012. Emerging Biotechnologies: Technology, Choice and the Public Good. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M., 2001. Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 2014. The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council’s Commitment to a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1, 113–17.Google Scholar
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., Stilgoe, J., 2012. Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society. Science and Public Policy 39, 751–60.Google Scholar
Owens, S., 2015. Knowledge, Policy, and Expertise: The UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1970–2011. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Perrow, C., 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M., 1962. The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Minerva 1, 54–73.Google Scholar
Rip, A., 2016. The Clothes of the Emperor. An Essay on RRI in and around Brussels. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3, 290–304.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M., 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press of Glencoe, New York.Google Scholar
Rose, N., 2006. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., 2013. Developing a Framework of Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42, 1568–80.Google Scholar
Stirling, A., 2008. ‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 23, 262–94.Google Scholar
Stirling, A., 2014. Emancipating Transformations: From Controlling ‘the Transition’ To Culturing Plural Radical Progress. STEPS Working Paper 64, STEPS Centre, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
von Schomberg, R., 2013. A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In: Owen, R., Bessant, J., Heintz, M. (eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Wiley, London, pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., Curtis, S., 2017. Framing Fracking: Exploring Public Responses to Hydraulic Fracturing in the UK. Public Understanding of Science 26, 89–104.Google Scholar
Yearley, S., 2008. Nature and the Environment in Science and Technology Studies. In: Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., Wajcman, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 921–47.Google Scholar
Zwart, H., Landeweerd, L., van Rooij, A., 2014. Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10, 11.Google Scholar

References

Allen, B. L. (2003). Uneasy Alchemy: Citizens and experts in Louisiana’s chemical corridor disputes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2004). Scientisation vs. civic expertise in environmental governance: Eco-feminist, eco-modern and post-modern responses. Environmental Politics, 13(4), 695–714.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. M. W., & Gregory, J. (2008). From journalism to corporate communication in post-war Britain. In Bauer, M. W. and Bucchi, M., (eds.) Journalism, Science and Society, pp. 45–64. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a new modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1996). World risk society as cosmopolitan society? Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured uncertainties. Theory, Culture & Society, 13(4), 1–32.Google Scholar
Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in Practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Bonneuil, C., & Levidow, L. (2012). How does the World Trade Organization know? The mobilization and staging of scientific expertise in the GMO trade dispute. Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 75–100.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Mikkelsen, E. J. (1997). No Safe Place: Toxic waste, leukemia, and community action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carrozza, C. (2015). Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: Different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(1), 108–126.Google Scholar
Casas-Cortés, M. I., Osterweil, M., & Powell, D. E. (2008). Blurring boundaries: Recognizing knowledge-practices in the study of social movements. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(1): 17–58.Google Scholar
Choudry, A. (2015). Learning Activism: The intellectual life of contemporary social movements. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2014). Are We All Scientific Experts Now? New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296.Google Scholar
Collins, H., Weinel, M., & Evans, R. (2010). The politics and policy of the Third Wave: New technologies and society. Critical Policy Studies, 4(2), 185–201.Google Scholar
Corburn, J. (2007). Community knowledge in environmental health science: Co-producing policy expertise. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(2), 150–161.Google Scholar
Curtis, A., Ross, H., Marshall, G. R., et al. (2014). The great experiment with devolved NRM governance: lessons from community engagement in Australia and New Zealand since the 1980s. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 21(2), 175–199.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems: An essay in political inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Dotson, T. (2015). Technological determinism and permissionless innovation as technocratic governing mentalities: Psychocultural barriers to the democratization of technology. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 98–120.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (1996). Impure Science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge (Vol. 7). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (2011). Misguided boundary work in studies of expertise: Time to return to the evidence. Critical Policy Studies, 5(3), 323–328.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (1998). Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology, 5(1), 53–82.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Frickel, S., Gibbon, S., Howard, J., et al. (2010). Undone science: charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(4), 444–473.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S., & Strand, R. (2007). Models of science and policy. In Traavik, T. and Lim, L. C., (eds.) Biosafety First: Holistic approaches to risk and uncertainty in genetic engineering and genetically modified organisms, pp. 263–278. Oslo, Norway: Tapir Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gouldson, A. (2004). Risk, regulation and the right to know: Exploring the impacts of access to information on the governance of environmental risk. Sustainable Development, 12(3), 136–149.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Ryan. (2014). Habermas in environmental thought: Anthropocentric Kantian or forefather of ecological democracy? Sociological Inquiry, 84(4), 626–653.Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, (3), 49–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity?” The Centennial Review, 36(3), 437–470.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (2015). Methodological Individualism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition). Retrieved December 31, 2018, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/methodological-individualism/Google Scholar
Hess, D. J. (2004). Medical modernisation, scientific research fields and the epistemic politics of health social movements. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(6), 695–709.Google Scholar
Irwin, A. (1993). Citizen Science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irwin, A. (2014). From deficit to democracy (re-visited). Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 71–76.Google Scholar
Jamison, A. (2010). Climate change knowledge and social movement theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(6), 811–823.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (2002). The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1980). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewenstein, B. V. (1992). The meaning of “public understanding of science” in the United States after World War II. Public Understanding of Science 1 (1): 45–58.Google Scholar
Longino, H. E. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, H. E. (2006). Philosophy of science after the social turn. In Galavotti, M. C. (ed.) Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle, pp. 167–177. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Markoff, J. (2015). Waves of Democracy: Social movements and political change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, T. R. (2013). Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 279–293.Google Scholar
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (eds.). (2011). Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From process to outcomes. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Morello-Frosch, R., Brody, J. G., Brown, P., et al. (2009). Toxic ignorance and right-to-know in biomonitoring results communication: A survey of scientists and study participants. Environmental Health, 8(1), 6. https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1476-069X-8-6Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1985). New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, 52(4): 817–868.Google Scholar
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of Doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google Scholar
Orsini, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Social movements, knowledge and public policy: The case of autism activism in Canada and the US. Critical Policy Studies, 4(1), 38–57.Google Scholar
Ottinger, G. (2010). Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(2), 244–270.Google Scholar
Pallett, H., & Chilvers, J. (2013). A decade of learning about publics, participation, and climate change: Institutionalising reflexivity? Environment and Planning A, 45(5), 1162–1183.Google Scholar
Pellizzoni, L. (2003). Knowledge, uncertainty and the transformation of the public sphere. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(3), 327–355.Google Scholar
Pellizzoni, L. (2010). Environmental knowledge and deliberative democracy. In Gross, M. and Heinrichs, H. (eds.) Environmental Sociology: European perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges, pp. 159–182. Dordrecht: Springer,Google Scholar
Phadke, R. (2005). People’s science in action: The politics of protest and knowledge brokering in India. Society and Natural Resources, 18(4), 363–375.Google Scholar
PielkeJr, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, L. (2003). Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(3), 41–57.Google Scholar
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431.Google Scholar
Sarzynski, A. (2015). Public participation, civic capacity, and climate change adaptation in cities. Urban Climate, 14, 52–67.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540.Google Scholar
Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.Google Scholar
Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., et al. (2006). Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society, 11(2): 39.Google Scholar
Whitley, R. (1985). Knowledge producers and knowledge acquirers. In Shinn, T. and Whitley, R. P. (eds.) Expository Science: Forms and functions of popularization, pp. 3–28. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(1), 281–304.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (1996). A reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide. In Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., and Wynne, B. (eds.) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a new ecology, pp. 44–83. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (2001). Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 10(4), 445–481.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (2013). Rationality and Ritual: Participation and exclusion in nuclear decision-making. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yearley, S. (2010). Science and the environment in the twenty-first century. In Redclift, M. R. and Woodgate, G. (eds.) The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, pp. 212–225. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. M. (1968). Public Knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science (Vol. 519). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Abramson, David M., Grattan, L. M., Mayer, B., Colten, C. E., et al. 2014. “The Resilience Activation Framework: A Conceptual Model of How Access to Social Resources Promotes Adaptation and Rapid Recovery in Post-Disaster Settings.” Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 42(1):42–57.Google Scholar
Adger, W. N. 2000. “Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related?” Progress in Human Geography 24(3):347–364.Google Scholar
Binkley, Sam. 2011. “Happiness, Positive Psychology and the Program of Neoliberal Governmentality.” Subjectivity 4(4):371–394.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16(1):4–33.Google Scholar
Caniglia, B. S., Frank, B., Delano, D., and Kerner, B.. 2014. “Enhancing Environmental Justice Research and Praxis: The Inclusion of Human Security, Resilience and Vulnerabilities Literature.” International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 8(4):409–426.Google Scholar
Caniglia, Beth, Vallee, Manuel, and Frank, Beatrice. 2016. Resilience, Environmental Justice and the City. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael. 2017a. “Agro-Digital Governance and Life Itself: Food Politics at the Intersection of Code and Affect.” Sociologia Ruralis 57(November):816–835.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael. 2017b. “More-than-Active Food Citizens: A Longitudinal and Comparative Study of Alternative and Conventional Eaters.” Rural Sociology 82(2):197–225.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael. 2017c. No One Eats Alone: Food as a Social Enterprise. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael. 2017d. “Publicising Food: Big Data, Precision Agriculture, and Co-Experimental Techniques of Addition.” Sociologia Ruralis 57(2):135–154.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael. 2018. “Justice Across Real and Imagined Food Worlds: Rural Corn Growers, Urban Agriculture Activists and the Political Ontologies They Live By.” Rural Sociology 83(4): 823–856.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael, and Stuart, Diana. 2016. “Get Real: Climate Change and All That ‘It’ Entails.” Sociologia Ruralis 56(1):74–95.Google Scholar
Cote, Muriel, and Nightingale, Andrea J.. 2012. “Resilience Thinking Meets Social Theory Situating Social Change in Socio-Ecological Systems (SES) Research.” Progress in Human Geography 36(4):475–489.Google Scholar
Davidson, Debra J. 2010. “The Applicability of the Concept of Resilience to Social Systems: Some Sources of Optimism and Nagging Doubts.” Society & Natural Resources 23(12):1135–1149.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” October 59(1):3–7.Google Scholar
Flora, C. B., Flora, J. L., and Gasteyer, S. P.. 2015. Rural Communities: Legacy + Change. Boulder, CO: Avalon Publishing.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lecture at the College De France, 1975–1976. edited by Bertani, Mauro and Macey, David. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Good, Jennifer. 2007. “Shop ’til We Drop? Television, Materialism and Attitudes About the Natural Environment.” Mass Communication and Society 10(3):365–383.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S.. 2001. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Hale, James, and Carolan, Michael. 2018a. “Cooperative or Uncooperative Co-Operatives?: Digging into the Process of Cooperation in Food and Agriculture Cooperatives.” Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 8(1):1–20.Google Scholar
Hale, James, and Carolan, Michael. 2018b. “Framing Cooperative Development: The Bridging Role of Cultural and Symbolic Value between Human and Material Resources.” Community Development 49(4): 360–379.Google Scholar
Hale, James, Legun, Katharine, Campbell, Hugh, and Carolan, Michael. 2019. “Social Sustainability Indicators as Performance.” Geoforum (March):1–9.Google Scholar
Hatt, Ken. 2013. “Social Attractors: A Proposal to Enhance ‘Resilience Thinking’ about the Social.” Society & Natural Resources 26(1):30–43.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S., and Gunderson, L. H.. 2002. “Resilience and Adaptive Cycles,” pp. 25–62 in Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, edited by Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S.. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, Judith V. 2013. “Relational Resilience in Girls,” pp. 73–86 in Handbook of Resilience in Children, edited by Ferrari, Michel and Fernando, Chandi. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Kasser, T. 2003. The High Price of Materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Law, John, and Urry, John. 2004. “Enacting the Social.” Economy and Society 33(3):390–410.Google Scholar
Magis, Kristen. 2010. “Community Resilience: An Indicator of Social Sustainability.” Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 23(5): 401–416.Google Scholar
Mayer, Brian. 2016. “A Framework for Improving Resilience Adaptation in Urban Contexts,” pp. 37–56 in Resilience, Environmental Justice and the City, edited by Caniglia, Beth, Vallee, Manuel, and Frank, Beatrice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIvor, David W., and Hale, James. 2015. “Urban Agriculture and the Prospects for Deep Democracy.” Agriculture and Human Values 32(4):727–741.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Michael, Griffith, Rod, Ryan, Paul, et al. 2014. “Applying Resilience Thinking to Natural Resource Management through a ‘Planning-By-Doing’ Framework.” Society & Natural Resources 27(3): 299–314.Google Scholar
Norris, Fran H., Stevens, Susan P., Pfefferbaum, Betty, Wyche, Karen F., and Pfefferbaum, Rose L.. 2008. “Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness.” American Journal of Community Psychology 41(1–2):127–150.Google Scholar
Olsson, Lennart, Jerneck, Anne, Thoren, Henrik, Persson, Johannes, and Byrne, David O.. 2015. “Why Resilience Is Unappealing to Social Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations of the Scientific Use of Resilience.” Science Advances (May):1–11.Google Scholar
Pauwelussen, Annet. 2016. “Community as Network: Exploring a Relational Approach to Social Resilience in Coastal Indonesia.” Maritime Studies 15(1):2.Google Scholar
Ross, Helen, and Berkes, Fikret. 2014. “Research Approaches for Understanding, Enhancing, and Monitoring Community Resilience.” Society & Natural Resources 27(8):787–804.Google Scholar
Smith, Carolyn, and Carlson, Bonnie E.. 2016. “Stress, Coping, and Resilience in Children.” Social Science Review 71(2):231–256.Google Scholar
Walker, Brian, Gunderson, Lance, Kinzig, Ann, et al. 2006. “A Handful of Heuristics and Some Propositions for Understanding Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 11(1): 13.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1985. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Richard C. 2012. The Cooperative Movement: Globalization from Below. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Wright, Sarah. 2015. “More-than-Human, Emergent Belongings: A Weak Theory Approach.” Progress in Human Geography 39(4):391–411.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×