Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education
- Cambridge Handbooks in Education
- The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part One Historical Perspectives
- Part Two Philosophical and Normative Foundations
- Part Three Key Topics and Concepts
- Part Four Challenges
- 26 Wealth Stratification in US Higher Education and Democratic Education, 1890s–2020s
- 27 Mentoring and Instructional Duties of Professors
- 28 Racism, Moral Transformation, and Democratic Education
- 29 Postcolonial Perspectives on Democratic Education
- 30 Populist Challenges to Democratic Education
- 31 Religion and Democratic Education
- 32 The Epistocratic Challenge to Democratic Education
- 33 Climate Change and Democratic Education
- 34 The COVID-19 Pandemic and Democratic Education
- 35 Teacher Neutrality, Pedagogical Impartiality, and Democratic Education
- Index
- References
30 - Populist Challenges to Democratic Education
from Part Four - Challenges
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education
- Cambridge Handbooks in Education
- The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part One Historical Perspectives
- Part Two Philosophical and Normative Foundations
- Part Three Key Topics and Concepts
- Part Four Challenges
- 26 Wealth Stratification in US Higher Education and Democratic Education, 1890s–2020s
- 27 Mentoring and Instructional Duties of Professors
- 28 Racism, Moral Transformation, and Democratic Education
- 29 Postcolonial Perspectives on Democratic Education
- 30 Populist Challenges to Democratic Education
- 31 Religion and Democratic Education
- 32 The Epistocratic Challenge to Democratic Education
- 33 Climate Change and Democratic Education
- 34 The COVID-19 Pandemic and Democratic Education
- 35 Teacher Neutrality, Pedagogical Impartiality, and Democratic Education
- Index
- References
Summary
“Populism” is a much used but still rather vague term employed mostly in political but also in educational discourses. To understand what is meant by “populist challenges to democratic education” this chapter first analyzes the historical relations between liberal democracy and public education. I then refer to a discussion of “populism” using a social-political definition of the term that was coined by American sociologist Edward Shils. This is followed by a discussion of populist changes in public discourse and education created by new media. My main focus is on the populist challenges to systems education systems and the challenges of populist positions in education itself. Finally, I will suggest the perspectives that remain for democratic education.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education , pp. 512 - 530Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Anselmi, M. (2018). Populism. An introduction. Trans. by Laura Fano Morrisey. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bender, M. C. (2021). “Frankly, we did win this election”: The inside story how Trump lost. New York/Boston: Twelve Books, Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar
Benoist, A. de (2019). Contre le libéralisme: La société n’est pas un marché. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1817). Plan of parliamentary reform, in the form of a catechism, with reasons for each article, with an introduction, renewing the necessity of radical, and the inadequacy of moderate, reform. London: R. Hunter.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1821). On the liberty of the press and public discussion. London: William Hone.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernecker, S., Flowerree, A. K., & Grundmann, T. (Eds.) (2021). The epistemology of fake news. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, G. (2020). Vox populi: Essays in the history of an idea. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Brexel, B. (2004). The populist party. A voice for the farmers in an industrial society. New York: Rosen.Google Scholar
Brühwiler, C. F., & Goktepe, K. (2021). Populism with a Ph.D.: Education levels and populist leaders. Journal of Political Power, 14(3), 449–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1904366.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (1855). Latter-day pamphlets. Boston/New York: Philipps, Sampson, and Company; J.C. Derby.Google Scholar
Deneen, P. J. (2018): Why liberalism failed. With a new preface. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1916/1985). The middle works 1899–1924, vol. 9: Democracy and education 1916. Ed. by Boydston, J. A.; introduced by S. Hook. Carbondale/Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Drinhausen, K., & Brussee, V. (2021, March 3): China’s social credit system in 2021. From fragmentation toward integration. Merics China Monitor. Available at: https://ccn.unistra.fr/websites/ccn/documentation/Cybersecurite/MERICS_ChinaMonitor_67_Social_Credit_System_final_1.pdf (accessed: December 27, 2021).Google Scholar
Giudici, A. (2021). Seeds of authoritarian opposition: Far-right education politics in post war Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 121–42.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. Microstudies of the public order. Harmondsworth/Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2021). Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit. In Seeliger, M. & Sevignani, S., eds., Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? (Leviathan Sonderband 37), Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 470–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haitiwaji, G., & Morgat, R. (2021). Rescapée du goulag Chinois. Paris: Editions des Equateurs.Google Scholar
Hersh, E. D. (2015). Hacking the electorate. How campaigns perceive voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, R. (1964, November). The paranoid style in American politics. Harper’s Magazine, 77–86.Google Scholar
Inazu, J. D. (2016). Confident pluralism. Surviving and thriving through deep difference. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, J. (2013). Democratic enlightenment. Philosophy, revolution, and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keefer, P., Scartascini, C., & Vlaicu, R. (2021). Trust, populism, and the quality of government. In Bågenholm, A., Bauhr, M., Grimes, M. & Rothstein, B., eds., The Oxford handbook of quality of government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–67.Google Scholar
Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics. Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, S. A. K., Lieb, R., Freeman, D., Andreou, C., & Zander-Schellenberg, T., (2021). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: Endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia. Psychological Medicine. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721001124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. P. (2016). The internet of us: Knowing more and understanding less in the age of big data. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Mårdh, A., & Tryggvason, Á. (2017). Democratic education and the mode of populism. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 601–13.Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement. How politics became our identity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moreau, I., & Holtz, G. (Eds.) (2005). “Parler librement”. La liberté de parole au tournant de XVIe auf XVIIe siècle. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oelkers, J. (2018). Autoritarismus und liberale öffentliche Bildung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 64(6), 728–48.Google Scholar
Oelkers, J. (2020). Authoritarianism ande in the interwar period. Paedagogica Historica, 56, 572–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (2020). The far-right education and violence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rucker, P., & Leonnig, C. (2021). A very stable genius. Donald J. Trump’s testing of America. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Runciman, D. (2018). Political hypocrisy. The mask of power. From Hobbes to Orwell and beyond. Rev. ed. with a new afterword by the author, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sant, E. (2019). Democratic education: A theoretical review (2006–2017). Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 655–96.Google Scholar
Shils, E. (1954). Populism and the rules of law. In S. Buchanan, et al., eds., University of Chicago Law School conference on jurisprudence and politics, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
Shils, E. (1956). The tournament of secrecy: The background and consequences of American politics. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Shils, E. (1982). The constitution of society. With a new introduction by the author. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
State Council Information Office (2021). China: Democracy that works. white paper. The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. Available at: www.news.cn/english/2021-12/04/c_1310351231.htm (accessed: December 28, 2021).Google Scholar
Stitzlein, S. M. (2017). American public education and the responsibility of its citizens. Supporting democracy in the age of accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strittmatter, K. (2018). Die Neuerfindung der Diktatur. Wie China den digitalen Überwachungsstatt aufbaut und uns damit herausfordert. 2nd ed., Munich: Piper Verlag.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #republic. Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Suthaharan, P., Reed, E. J., Leptourgos, P., et al. (2021). Paranoia and belief updating during the Covid-19 crisis. Human Nature Behavior, 5, 1190–202.Google Scholar
Thalmann, K. (2019). The stigmatization of conspiracy theory since the 1950’s. “A plot to make us look foolish”. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ungar-Sargon, B. (2021). Bad news: How woke media is undermining democracy. New York: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
Van der Geest, I., Jansen, H., & Van Klink, B. (Eds.) (2020). Vox populi: Populism as a rhetorical and democratic challenge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2020). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspirational thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 32–51.Google Scholar
Watson, S., & Barnes, N. (2021). Online educational populism and New Right 2.0 in Australia and England. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(22), 208–20. DOI: 10.1080/14767744.2021.1882292 (accessed: December 25, 2021).Google Scholar
Zhang, C. (2019). Right-wing populist discourse on Chinese social media: Identity, otherness, and global imaginaries. Les Cahiers des Cevipol, 3, 2–31.Google Scholar