Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-j5c6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T13:50:29.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Pitfalls of Social Interaction in Online Group Learning

from Part III - Activities in Cyber Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2024

By
Karel Kreijns ,
Joshua Weidlich  and
Paul A. Kirschner
Edited by
Zheng Yan
Zheng Yan
Affiliation:
University at Albany, State University of New York
Get access

Summary

1 Introduction

2 Pitfall 1: Assuming that Cooperative and Collaborative Learning Are the Same

3 Pitfall 2: Assuming that Social Interaction in Group Learning Is Automatic

 3.1 Traditional Pedagogical Techniques

  3.1.1 Conceptual Approach to Structuring Group Learning: Johnson and Johnson’s Five Basic Elements

  3.1.2 Direct Approach to Structuring Group Learning: Structured Academic Controversy, Jigsaw, Reciprocal Teaching, Student Teams Achievement Division

 3.2 Technology-Enabled Pedagogical Techniques

  3.2.1 Dillenbourg’s Four Categories of Lines to Structure Collaborative Learning

  3.2.2 Scripting and the Script Theory of Guidance

  3.3.3 Knowledge-Building Framework

4 Pitfall 3: Being Unaware of the Need for Academic Skills

 4.1 Epistemic Skills

 4.2 Metacognitive Skills

5 Pitfall 4: Restricting Social Interaction to Socio-cognitive Processes

 5.1 Group Dynamics

6 Pitfall 5: Being Unaware of the Need for Social Skills

 6.1 Interpersonal and Small-Group Skills

 6.2 Skills for the Regulation of Emotion and Motivation

7 Pitfall 6: Ignoring the Students’ Dispositions toward Group Learning

8 Pitfall 7: Assuming that Online Group Learning Does Not Differ from Face-to-Face Learning

9 Future Directions

10 In Conclusion

Keywords

online group learningCSCLsocial presencecollaborative learningpitfalls of social interactionstructuring group learninggroup dynamicsface-to-face versus online learningsocial spacesociability
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Cyber Behavior , pp. 588 - 630
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, P. & O’Brien, C. L. (2008) Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255–64. http://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algarni, A., & Burd, L. (2015). Perceptions of students and instructors toward the role of CommEasy in tackling communication and interaction barriers in distance-learning classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Frontiers in education conference (FIE ’15). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344130Google Scholar
Alvídrez, S., Piñeiro-Naval, V., Marcos-Ramos, M., & Rojas-Solís, J. L. (2015). Intergroup contact in computer-mediated communication: The interplay of a stereotype-disconfirming behavior and a lasting group identity on reducing prejudiced perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom. Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Bagherian, F., & Thorngate, W. (2000). Horses to water: Student use of course newsgroups. FirstMonday, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v5i8.779Google Scholar
Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(3), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00019.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1965) The equilibrium problem in small groups. In Hare, A. P., Borgatta, E. F., & Bales, R. F. (Eds.), Small groups: Studies in social interaction. Knopf.Google Scholar
Bodemer, D., & Dehler, J. (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1043–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boekaerts, M., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Emotions and emotion regulation in academic settings. In Corno, L., & Anderman, E. M. (Eds), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 76–90). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2012). Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Education, 33(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonebright, D. A. (2010). Perspectives. 40 years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman’s model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678861003589099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, C. W. (2000). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, J., & Kumar, P. (2015). Students’ perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 10(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0783-3.ch073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromme, R., Hesse, F. W., Spada, H. (Eds.). (2005). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication: And how they may be overcome (Vol. 5). Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran, S., Badwal, P. S., Littlefair, G., & Mühlfelder, M. (2016). Framework guidelines for students: Collaborative learning in distance education. Journal of Modern Education Review, 6(12), 940–951. https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/12.06.2016/008Google Scholar
Chauhan, J. (2017). An insight to collaboration in MOOC. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 4(7), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.21090/IJAERD.21579Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comer, D. R. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48(6), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, G., Lockee, B., & Meng, C. (2013). Building modern online social presence: A review of social presence theory and its instructional design implications for future trends. Education and Information Technologies, 18(4), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9192-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2013). The benefits of cooperative learning to socio-scientific discussion in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1533–1560, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.642324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, F. (2019). Kennis in-(ter)-actie: Responsief leren als kennis constructie. Inaugural address. Heerlen, The Netherlands. Open University of the Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lima, D. P. R., Gerosa, M. A., & Conte, T.U (2019). What to expect, and how to improve online discussion forums: The instructors’ perspective. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 10(22). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-019-0120-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–16). Pergamon, Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In Kirschner, P. A. (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Open Universiteit Nederland.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007), Designing integrative scripts. In Fischer, F., Kollar, I.., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (Vol. 6, pp. 275–301). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erichsen, E. A., & Bolliger, D. U. (2011). Towards understanding international graduate student isolation in traditional and online environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/41414943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertl, B., Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2007). Supporting collaborative learning in videoconferencing using collaboration scripts and content schemes. In Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (Vol. 6, pp. 213–236). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exter, M. E., Korkmaz, N., Harlin, N. M., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2009). Sense of community within a fully online program: Perspective of graduate students. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(20), 177–194.Google Scholar
Finntrack Ltd. (2011). Group development. Available at: http://finntrack.co.uk/leadership/people_and_org/grp8.htmGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002) Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C., (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. doi: 10.4324/9780203838020Google Scholar
Fransen, J., Weiberger, A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.747947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbert, B., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. (1986). Cooperative learning, group-to-individual transfer, process gain, and the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1986%20.10545253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, D. R. (1993). Quality and theory in distance education: Theoretical consideration. In Keegan, D. (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ghaffari, M. (2019). Building a community of learners: Lessons learned. Nursing Practice and Health Care, 1(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web-courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29–35.Google Scholar
Gillies, R. M. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00072-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroom-based work groups. Learning and Instruction, 6(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(96)00002-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1998). Behavior and interactions of children in cooperative groups in lower and middle elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. W. (1999). Cooperative learning and social skills: What skills to teach and how to teach them. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129903500105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, P., & Zenios, M. (2007). Discussion, collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 351–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00383.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430303953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2&3), 147–166.Google Scholar
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. https://dxo.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAGCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunawardena, C. N., and Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gweon, G., Jain, M., McDonough, J., Raj, B., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). Measuring prevalence of other-oriented transactive contributions using an automated measure of speech style accommodation. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9172-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadwin, A. F., Jarvela, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In Schunk, D. & Greene, J. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 83–106). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning Higher Education, 14(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannafin, R. D., & Foshay, W. R. (2008). Computer-based instruction’s (CBI) rediscovered role in K-12: An evaluation case study of one high school’s use of CBI to improve pass rates on high-stakes tests. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9007-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner–interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltz, S. R. (1990). Evaluating the virtual classroom. In Harasim, L. (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 133–183). Praeger/Greenwood.Google Scholar
Hobaugh, C. F. (1997). Interactive strategies for collaborative learning. In Olgren, C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning: Competition–Connection–Collaboration (pp. 121–125). University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. (2016) Social Identity Theory. In: McKeown, S., Haji, R., Ferguson, N. (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1Google Scholar
Hong, H. Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl1423-009-9122-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurme, T-R., Merenluoto, K., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Socially shared metacognition of pre-service primary teachers in a computer-supported mathematics course and their feelings of task difficulty: A case study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(5), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610903444659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 52(4). Available from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss4/5Google Scholar
Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isohätälä, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Socially shared regulation of learning and participation in social interaction in collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., & Baker, M. J. (2018). Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., … & Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Regulating emotions together for motivated collaboration. In Baker, M., Järvelä, S., & Andriessen, J. (Eds.), Affective learning together (pp. 162–181). Routledge.Google Scholar
Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., Törmänen, T., Näykki, P., Malmberg, J. Kurki, K., … Isohätälä, J. (2018). Capturing motivation and emotion regulation during a learning process. Frontline Learning Research, 6(3), 85–104. http://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i3.369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Koivuniemi, M. (2016). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 42, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvenoja, H., Näykki, P. & Törmänen, T. (2019). Emotional regulation in collaborative learning: When do higher education students activate group level regulation in the face of challenges? Studies in Higher Education, 44(10), 1747–1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019%20.1665318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvenoja, H., Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (2012). Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: An instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology, 33, 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.742334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010, June). An overview of CSCL methodologies. In Gomez, K., Lyons, L., & Radinsky, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Vol. 1 (pp. 921–928). International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. (2017). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (12th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1988). Critical thinking through structured controversy. Educational Leadership, 45(8), 58–64.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher’s role. In Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A. F., & Terwel, J. (Eds.), The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (Vol. 7, pp. 9–37). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social inter-dependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in the 21st century. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 841–851. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017, September, 22–23). Cooperative learning. Paper presented at the Innovación educación: I congreso internacional. Zaragoza, Spain.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. In Brito, S. M. (Ed.), Active learning – Beyond the future (pp. 59–70). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory [Special focus issue: Small-group learning in higher education – Cooperative, collaborative, problem-based, and team-based learning]. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 85–118.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Cooperative Learning Center at the University of Minnesota. Available at: www.clcrc.com/pages/cl-methhods.htmlGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlin, M., & Ozogul, G. O. (2018). Design and implementation of a structured academic controversy for preservice teachers in a computer education licensure program. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 7(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.28990/jaid2018.071005Google Scholar
Kaye, A. R. (1992). Learning apart together. In Kaye, A. R. (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 1–24). Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kear, K. (2010, May 3–4). Social presence in online learning communities. In Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., Jones, C., de Laat, M., McConnell, D., & Ryberg, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning 2010 (NLC2010) (pp. 541–548). Aalborg.Google Scholar
Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1981). Ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 1–15.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00021-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Kreijns, K., Phielix, C., & Fransen, J. (2015). Awareness of cognitive and social behaviour in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koedinger, K., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 239–264. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts: A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003, August, 26–30). Affording sociability for distributed teamwork: Trials and tribulations. Presentation at the 10th European conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Padova, Italy.Google Scholar
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Van Buuren, H., & Jochems, W. (2004). Determining sociability, social space and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborative groups. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104323024429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreijns, K., Xu, K. Weidlich, J. (2021). Social presence: Conceptualization and measurement. Educational Psychology Review. Open Access. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09623-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulik, C.-L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(91)90030-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Mannonen, J. (2020). The potential of temporal analysis: Combining log data and lag sequential analysis to investigate temporal differences between scaffolded and non-scaffolded group inquiry-based learning processes. Computers & Education, 143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018) Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y-H. (2015). Facilitating critical thinking using the C-QRAC collaboration script: Enhancing science reading literacy in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 88, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legon, R., & Garrett, R. (2018). The changing landscape of online learning. A deeper dive. The Changing Landscape of Online Education (The Education Report). Available at: www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/2018-QM-Eduventures-CHLOE-2-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lethinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review of CL-Net Project (The J. H. G. I. Giesbers Reports on Education No. 10). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2000). Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40(3), 41–45.Google Scholar
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (Eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education (pp. 31–51). Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2002). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two different experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26(2), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260220144748Google Scholar
Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Holappa, J., Haataja, E., Huang, X., & Siipo, A. (2018). Going beyond what is visible: What multichannel data can reveal about interaction in the context of collaborative learning. Computers and Human Behavior, 96, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high- and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez, L. M. T., Llinás, J. G., & Macías, F. S. (2017). Collaborative learning: Use of the jigsaw technique in mapping concepts of physics. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(1), 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhaw, K., Schnackenberg, H., Sclater, J., & Abrami, P. C. (2013). From co-operation to collaboration: Helping students become collaborative learners. In Gillies, R. M. & Ashman, A. F. (Eds.), Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 69–86). Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Miles, J. R., & Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (2012). Perceptions of group climate by social identity group in intergroup dialogue. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. L. (2003). The stages of group development: A retrospective study of dynamic team processes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00698.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. (2015). Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: Changing the landscape of support in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 573–588. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.chb.2015.01.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millis, B. J., & Cottell, P. G. (1998) Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Oryx Press.Google Scholar
Molenaar, I. (2014). Advances in temporal analysis in learning and instruction. Frontline Learning Research, 2(4), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i4.118Google Scholar
Molenaar, I., Sleegers, P., & van Boxtel, C. (2014). Metacognitive scaffolding during collaborative learning: A promising combination. Metacognition and Learning, 9(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9118-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In Keegan, D. (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, M. G. (2019). The theory of transactional distance. In Moore, M. G. & Diehl, W. C. (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 32–46). Routledge.Google Scholar
Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In Wilson, B. (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 107–119). Educational Technology Press.Google Scholar
Mu, J. Stegman, K. & Fisher, F. (2013). How collaboration scripts are internalized: A script theory of guidance perspective. In Rummel, N., Kapur, M., Nathan, M., & Puntambekar, S. (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 conference proceedings (Vol. 2): Short papers, panels, posters, demos & community events (pp. 113–116). ISLS.Google Scholar
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, B. (2001). Raising student social presence in online classes. In WebNet 2001. Proceedings of the World conference on the WWW and Internet. AACE.Google Scholar
Norman, E., Tjomsland, H. E., & Huegel, D. (2016). The distance between us: Using construal level theory to understand interpersonal distance in a digital age. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 3, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2016.00005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education, 61, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northrup, P. T. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity into web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2), 31–39.Google Scholar
OECD: PISA 2015. (2017). Results (Volume V): Collaborative problem polving. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling. In Reimann, P. & Spada, H. (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines (pp. 37–62). Pergamon, Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, C. (Ed.) (1995). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), vol. 128. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986) Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 771–777.Google Scholar
Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panhwar, A. H., Gopang, A. S., Chachar, Z. A. & Baloch, S. (2017). Differentiating cooperative learning and collaborative Learning: What is fit for Pakistani higher education? International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n5p119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panitz, T. (1996a). Collaborative versus cooperative Learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive Learning. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED448443Google Scholar
Panitz, T. (1996b). A definition of collaborative vs. cooperative learning. Available at: http://colccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/a_definition_of_collaborative_vs_cooperative_learning.pdf.Google Scholar
Panitz, T. (1999). Benefits of cooperative learning in relation to student motivation. In Theall, M. (Ed.), Motivation from within: Approaches for encouraging faculty and students to excel (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, pp. 59–68). Josey-Bass Publishing.Google Scholar
Panitz, T (2019). Cooperative learning (Chapter 3) [e-book version]. Available at: https://tpanitz.jimdo.com/ted-s-coop-learning-ebook/Google Scholar
Paul, R. C., Swart, W., Zhang, A. M., & MacLeod, K. R. (2015). Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional distance: Refinement and validation using structural equation modeling. Distance Education, 36(3), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phirangee, K. & Malec, A. (2017) Othering in online learning: An examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Distance Education, 38(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigliapoco, E., & Bogliolo, A. (2008). The effects of psychological sense of community in online and face-to-face academic courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 3(4), 60–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v3i4.201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popov, V., van Leeuwen, A., & Buis, S. C. A. (2017). Are you with me or not? Temporal synchronicity and transactivity during CSCL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism and social learning. Routledge.Google Scholar
Puzio, K., & Colby, G. T. (2013). Cooperative learning and literacy: A meta-analytic review. .Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(4), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747%20.2013.775683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raidal, S. L., & Volet, S. E. (2009). Preclinical students’ predispositions towards social forms of instruction and self-directed learning: A challenge for the development of autonomous and collaborative learners. Journal of Higher Education, 57, 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734‑008-9163-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raviv, A., Cohen, S., & Aflalo, E. (2019). How students learn in the school science laboratory? The benefits of cooperative learning. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9618-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, C. A., & Sutton, J. (2014). The importance of social presence and motivation in distance learning. The Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering, 30(2). Available at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.atmae.org/resource/resmgr/articles/robb___sutton-the_importance.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rochelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Malley, C. O (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), vol. 128. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5Google Scholar
Rockwood, R. (1995). Cooperative and collaborative learning. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/ntlf.10024Google Scholar
Rodríguez‐Triana, M. J., Martínez‐Monés, A., Asensio‐Pérez, J. I., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, E., van der Linden, J., & Erkens, G. (2000). Leren in dialoog: Een discussie over samenwerkend leren in onderwijs en opleiding. In van der Linden, J. & Roelofs, E. (Eds.), Leren in dialoog: Een discussie over samenwerkend leren in onderwijs en opleiding (pp. 7– 34). Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Rourke, L. (2000). Operationalizing social interaction in computer conferencing. In Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the Canadian Association for Distance Education (pp. 335–353). Quebec City.Google Scholar
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002) Exploring social communication in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 259–275.Google Scholar
Sawyer, J., & Obeid, R. (2017). Cooperative and collaborative learning: Getting the best of both words. In Obeid, R., Schwartz, A., Shane-Simpson, C., & Brooks, P. J. (Eds.), How we teach now: The GSTA guide to student-centered teaching (pp. 163–177). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In Smith, B. (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Open Court.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In Guthrie, J. W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (pp. 1370–1373). Mcamillan Reference.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2006). About scripting: The effects of two CSCL scripts on university students’ critical thinking. In Current developments in technology-assisted education: proceedings of m-ICTE2006 (vol. 2: Technological Science Education, Collaborative Learning, Knowledge Management, pp. 1374–1378). FORMATEX.Google Scholar
Shimazou, J., & Aldrich, H. (2010). Group work can be gratifying: Understanding and overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 58(2),52–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903418594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Student teams achievement divisions. In Sharan, S. (Ed.), Handbook of co-operative learning methods (pp. 3–19). Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., Jaspers, J., Janssen, J. & Phielix, C. (2010). Fostering complex learning-task performance through scripting student use of computer supported representational tools. Computers & Education, 55, 1707–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 40–62.Google Scholar
Soller, A. L., Lesgold, A., Linton, F., & Goodman, B. (1999). What makes peer interaction effective? Modeling effective communication in an intelligent CSCL. In Brennan, S. E., Giboin, A. & Traum, D. (Eds.), Psychological models of communication in collaborative systems: Papers from the AIII Fall Symposium (Technical Report FS-99–03, pp. 116–123). The AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Spoelstra, H. (2015). Collaborations in open learning environment. Unpublished dissertation. Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit.Google Scholar
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 479–500). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staublitz, T., Pfeiffer, T., Renz, J., Willems, C., & Meinel, C. (2015). Collaborative learning in a MOOC environment. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference of education, research and innovation (pp. 8237–8246). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3053975Google Scholar
Stern, A., Schultze, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2017). How much group is necessary? Group-to-individual transfer in estimation tasks. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strijbos, J-W. (2004). The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit.Google Scholar
Strijbos, J-W., & Weinberger, A. (2010). Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 491–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thai, M., Sheeran, N., & Cummings, D. J. (2019). We’re all in this together: The impact of Facebook groups on social connectedness and other outcomes in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 40, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/0.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups, Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Supporting teachers in guiding collaborating students: Effects of learning analytics in CSCL. Computers & Education, 79, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Enschede, The Netherlands: Print Partners Ipskamp.Google Scholar
Veldman, M. A., & Kostons, D. (2019). Cooperative and collaborative learning: Considering four dimensions of learning in groups. Pedagogische Studiën, 96, 76–81.Google Scholar
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fisher, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 477–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E. D. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., & Fang, Y. (2005). Benefits of cooperative learning un Weblog networks. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490815Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2256–2268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G, & Johnson, D. W. (1972). Social psychology: Issues and insights (2nd ed.). Lippincott.Google Scholar
Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2017). Explaining social presence and the quality of online learning with the SIPS model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2018). Technology matters – The impact of transactional distance on satisfaction in online distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2019). Designing sociable online learning environments and enhancing social presence: An affordance enrichment approach. Computers & Education, 142, 103622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning: Effects of social and epistemic scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Unpublished PhD dissertation. München, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.Google Scholar
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: Scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups. In Koschmann, T., Suthers, D., & Chan, T. W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning: learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 717–726). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wheelan, S. A. (2004). Group processes: A developmental perspective (Vol. 34). Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Wheelan, S. A., & Lisk, A. R. (2000). Cohort group effectiveness and the educational achievement of adult undergraduate students. Small Group Research, 31(6), 724–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, T. W., & Sherman, T. M. (1991). Telecommunications-based distance education: Who’s doing what? Educational Technology, 31(11), 54–59. https://doi.org/0.1111/j.1937-8327.1998.tb00096.xGoogle Scholar
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). nStudy: Tracing and supporting self-regulated learning in the Internet. In Azevedo, R. & Aleven, V. (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (vol. 26., pp. 293–308). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Perry, N. E. (2013). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In Hmelo-Silver, C., O’Donnell, A., Chan, C., & Chinn, C. (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462–479). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wise, A. F., Cui, Y., Jin, W., & Vytasek, J. (2017). Mining for gold: Identifying content-related MOOC discussion threads across domains through linguistic modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, A. F., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 423–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412–017–9267–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B. (2013) Assessing and predicting college students’ use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation, The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. M. & Chen, K-C. (2010). Evaluation techniques for cooperative learning. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v14i1.815Google Scholar
Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Román-Martínez, I., & Gómez-Miranda, M. E. (2015). Measuring the impact of inquiry-based learning on outcomes and student satisfaction. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1050–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.963836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano, R. J., Kirschner, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). The effect of the prior collaborative experience op the effectiveness and efficiency of collaborative learning. In Kay, J. & Luckin, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference of the learning sciences: Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count (ICLS 2018) (Vol 1., pp. 112–119). ICLS.Google Scholar
Zenios, M. (2011). Epistemic activities and collaborative learning: Towards an analytical model for studying knowledge construction in networked learning settings. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00394.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, L., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2017). The effect of socially shared regulation approach on learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226Google Scholar
Zheng, W., & Wei, J. (2018). Linking ethnic composition and performance: Information integration between majority and minority members. Small Group Research, 49(3), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417749727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, J., Xing, W., & Zhu, G. (2019). Examining sequential patterns of self-and socially shared regulation of STEM learning in a CSCL environment. Computers & Education, 136, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×