Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions
- Copyright page
- Dedications
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Creativity and Emotions
- Part I Methods in the Study of Creativity and Emotions
- 1 Experimental Methods in the Study of Emotions and Creativity
- 2 Affect, Complexity, and the Case Study Method
- 3 Observational Methods in the Study of Creativity and Emotions
- 4 Assessing Creativity and Affect in Everyday Environments
- Part II The Development of Creativity
- Part III Emotions and the Creative Person
- Part IV Emotions and Creative Products
- Part V Emotions and Creativity at School and Work
- Index
- References
2 - Affect, Complexity, and the Case Study Method
from Part I - Methods in the Study of Creativity and Emotions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions
- Copyright page
- Dedications
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Creativity and Emotions
- Part I Methods in the Study of Creativity and Emotions
- 1 Experimental Methods in the Study of Emotions and Creativity
- 2 Affect, Complexity, and the Case Study Method
- 3 Observational Methods in the Study of Creativity and Emotions
- 4 Assessing Creativity and Affect in Everyday Environments
- Part II The Development of Creativity
- Part III Emotions and the Creative Person
- Part IV Emotions and Creative Products
- Part V Emotions and Creativity at School and Work
- Index
- References
Summary
Case study method is a crucial research tool that works in dialogue with other methodologies to identify the real-world challenges of creative work. Whereas most psychological methodologies isolate variables or measure their relative importance in predicting what is likely to happen across a population, case studies attempt to understand the systemic complexity of specific instances, describing how things can happen in order to consider why. Cases can elaborate on findings from other research, offer caveats to those findings, or raise new research questions. Affect, an important topic that both draws on researchers’ insights and tests their perspectives, exemplifies the data that case work is adept at recognizing and can offer to such a dialogue. This chapter discusses how case research can examine affect and provides examples from research on creative work using the evolving systems and participatory framework approaches. Five guiding questions are provided to help researchers integrate analyses of affect into case studies and situate those findings in relation to other research. These questions address the researcher’s philosophical stance, the possibilities and limits of a given case, the functions of affect within the case, patterns in affective systems, and the potential for both insight and bias.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions , pp. 30 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 20–46. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2012). Emotions are real. Emotion, 12(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027555Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2017). How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Houghton-Mifflin-Harcourt.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., & Lindquist, K. A. (2008). The embodiment of emotion. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (Eds.), Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches (pp. 237–262). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805837.011Google Scholar
Bruce, S. G. (2019). Curiosity killed the monk: The history of early medieval vice. Journal of Medieval Monastic Studies, 8, 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JMMS.5.117960Google Scholar
Clapp, E. P. (2016). Participatory Creativity: Introducing Access and Equity to the Creative Classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671512Google Scholar
Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In Wyer, R. S. & Srull, T. (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 323–417). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clore, G. L., Wyer, R. S., Dienes, B., et al. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In Martin, L. L. & Clore, G. L. (Eds.), Theories of Mood and Cognition: A User’s Guidebook (pp. 27–62). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2000). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Mariner Books.Google Scholar
Duffy, E. (1934). Is emotion a mere term of convenience? Psychological Review, 41(1), 103–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075951Google Scholar
Dunikowska, M., & Turko, L. (2011). Fritz Haber: The damned scientist. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 50(43), 10050–10062.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1972). Universal and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotions. In Cole, J. K. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (vol. 19, pp. 207–283). University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 52–72). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fieguth, P. (2017). An Introduction to Complex Systems: Society, Ecology, and Nonlinear Dynamics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44606-6Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B Series, 359(1449), 1367–1378. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frijda, N. H. (1988). The law of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349Google Scholar
Fussell, P. (2000). The Great War and Modern Memory. Oxford University Press. (Original published in 1975)Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00445.xGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed Creativity: Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual. Springer.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., & Womersley, G. (2021). Affective mobilities: Migration, emotion and (im)possibility. Mobilities, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1920337Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., et al. (2020), Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural manifesto. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395Google Scholar
Gilet, A.-L., & Jallais, C. (2012). Mood’s influence on semantic memory: Valence or arousal? In Masmoudi, S., Dai, D. Y., & Naceur, A. (Eds.), Attention, Representation, and Human Performance: Integration of Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation (pp. 77–91). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In Wallace, D. B. & Gruber, H. E. (Eds.), Creative People at Work (pp. 3–24). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. N. (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving systems approach to creative thinking. In Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 243–270). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487Google Scholar
Haber, F. (1933). Correspondence. Fritz Haber. Haber Collection, Rep. 13, 911. Archives of the Max Planck Society, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Hanchett Hanson, M. (2005). Irony and conflict: Lessons from Shaw’s wartime journey. In Wallace, D. B. (Ed.), Education, Art and Morality: Creative Journeys (pp. 19–44). Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hanchett Hanson, M. (2015). Worldmaking: Psychology and the Ideology of Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hanchett Hanson, M., Amato, A., Durani, A., et al. (2021). Improvised Educations: Case Studies for Understanding Impact and Implications. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanchett Hanson, M., & Glăveanu, V. (2020). The importance of case studies and the evolving systems. In Dörfler, V. & Stierand, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods on Creativity (pp.195–208). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439659.00023Google Scholar
Huxtable, R. J. (2002). Reflections: Fritz Haber and the ambiguity of ethics. Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society, 45, 1–3.Google Scholar
Immordino‐Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Body, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.xGoogle Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Hoffmann, J. (2019). Emotions and creativity: From process to person and product. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R.J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., pp. 273–295). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100(2), 189–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21202Google Scholar
Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K. (2017). A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2036–2051. http://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000339Google Scholar
Laird, J. D. (1984). The real role of facial response in the experience of emotion: A reply to Tourangeau and Ellsworth, and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 909-917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.909Google Scholar
Lane, R. D., & Schwartz, G. E. (1987). Levels of emotional awareness: A cognitive-developmental theory and its application to psychopathology. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(2), 133–143.Google Scholar
Löfgren, O. (1981). On the anatomy of culture: The problem of home blindness. Ethnologia Europaea, 12(1), 26–46. http://doi.org/10.16995/EE.1860Google Scholar
Manchester, K. L. (2002). Man of destiny: The life and work of Fritz Haber. Endeavour, 26(2), 64–69. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0160–9327(02)01420-5Google Scholar
Oyama, H. T. (2015). Setsuro Tamaru and Fritz Haber: Links between Japan and Germany in science and technology. The Chemical Record, 15(2), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201402086Google Scholar
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648–006-9029-9Google Scholar
Sawyer, K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046234Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513Google Scholar
Shaw, G. B. (1931). Commonsense about the war. In, What I Really Wrote about the War (pp. 19–96). Brentano. (Original published in 1914)Google Scholar
Siegel, E. H., Sands, M. K., Van den Noortgate, W., et al. (2018). Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A meta-analytic investigation of autonomic features of emotion categories. Psychological Bulletin, 144(4), 343–393. http://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000128Google Scholar
Stern, F. (2012). Fritz Haber: Flawed greatness of person and country. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201107900Google Scholar
Stern, R. A. (1963). Fritz Haber: Personal recollections. The Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook, 8(1), 70–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/leobaeck/8.1.70Google Scholar
Wallace, D. B., & Gruber, H. E. (Eds.). (1989). Creative People at Work: Twelve Cognitive Case Studies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. J. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention and the Arts. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Witschi, H. (2000a). Fritz Haber: 1868–1934. Toxicological Sciences, 55(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/55.1.1Google Scholar
Witschi, H. (2000b). Fritz Haber: December 9, 1868 – January 29, 1934. Toxicology, 149(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300–483x(00)00227-4Google Scholar
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102Google Scholar
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3085Google Scholar