Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:40:00.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Corrective Feedback and Language Skills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Edited by
Hossein Nassaji  and
Eva Kartchava
Hossein Nassaji
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, British Columbia
Eva Kartchava
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching , pp. 365 - 470
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammar, A. & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all?: Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060268.Google Scholar
Basturkmen, H. (2017). Explicit versus implicit grammar knowledge. In Liontas, J. (ed.), TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (Vol. V, pp. 2738–2743). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley .Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1994). Adjusting the focus: Teacher roles in task-based learning of grammar. In M. Bygate, A. Tonkyn, & E. Williams, (eds.), Grammar and the Language Teacher (pp. 237–259). London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00290.x.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 94–112). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fu, M. (2019). The timing effects of corrective feedback and their associations with working memory, declarative memory and procedural memory. PhD dissertation in progress. University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Goldschneider, J. & DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A Meta‐analysis of multiple determinants. Language learning, 51(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000149.Google Scholar
Guchte, M., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G. & Bimmel, P. (2015). Learning new grammatical structures in task-based language learning: The effects of recasts and prompts. Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12211.Google Scholar
Harmer, J. (1983). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Educational Limited.Google Scholar
Hawkes, L. & Nassaji, H. (2016). The role of extensive recasts in error detection and correction by adult ESL students. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 19–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.2.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2014). The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of the linguistic target. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813510384.Google Scholar
Li, S., Zhu, Y. & Ellis, R. (2016). The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12315.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2012). The role of feedback. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 24–40). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 361–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59(2), 453–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 269–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060128.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: a series of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Park, H. & Tagarelli, K. (2016). Errors, corrective feedback and repair. In Hall, H. (ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 499–512). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59(2), 411–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00511.x.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2017). The effectiveness of extensive versus intensive recasts for learning L2 grammar. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12387.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1988). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 52–79.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. (2014). Delayed versus immediate corrective feedback on orally produced passive errors in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Startvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive grammar of the English language. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ranta, L. & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The awareness-practice-feedback sequence. In DeKeyser, R. (ed.), Practice in a second language: perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sato, M. & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000356.Google Scholar
Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning teaching: The essential guide to English language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford: Macmillan Educational.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thornbury, S. (2018). Learning grammar. In Richards, J. & Burns, A. (eds.), The Cambridge guide to learning a second language (pp. 183–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990519.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2012). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 344–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams044.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. & Yuksel, D. (2011). Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412873.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2015). The effects of explicit and implicit recasts on the acquisition of two grammatical structures and the mediating role of working memory. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar

References

Adams, R. (2003). L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 347–376. DOI:10.1191/1362168803lr127oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcón, E. & García Mayo, M. P. (2008). Incidental focus on form and learning outcomes with young foreign language classroom learners. In Philp, J., Oliver, R. & Mackey, A. (eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child’s play? (pp. 173–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, H., Jeon, K. S., MacGregor, D. & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 209–236. DOI:10.1017/S0272263106060104.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. DOI:10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00038-9.Google Scholar
Chen, C. & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 693–713. DOI:10.1093/applin/amq031.Google Scholar
Coyle, Y. & Roca de Larios, J. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 451–485. DOI:10.1017/s0272263113000612.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B. & Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50(1), 1–56. DOI:10.1111/0023-8333.00110.Google Scholar
de la Fuente, M. J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 263–295. DOI:10.1191/1362168806lr196oa.Google Scholar
Dilāns, G. (2010). Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), 787–816. DOI:10.3138/cmlr.66.6.787.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egi, T. (2007a). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(4), 511–537. DOI:10.1017/S0272263107070416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egi, T. (2007b). Recasts, learners’ interpretation, and L2 development. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 249–267). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335–349. DOI:10.1017/s0272263109990544.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 575–600. DOI:10.1017/S027226310606027X.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers?: New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., Behney, J. & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Torres, M. J. A. (2005). Attention when? An investigation of the ordering effects of input and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 1–31. DOI:10.1017/S0272263105050011.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474. DOI:10.1017/S0272263112000149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haastrup, K. & Henriksen, B. (2001). The interrelationship between vocabulary acquisition theory and general SLA research. EUROSLA Yearbook, 1, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four- stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11(4), 459–479. DOI:10.1177/1362168807080963.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (eds.). (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, K. S. (2007). Interaction-driven L2 learning: Characterizing linguistic development. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 379–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kamiya, N. (2016). The relationship between stated beliefs and classroom practices of oral corrective feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 206–219. DOI:10.1080/17501229.2014.939656.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (2009). Second language vocabulary acquisition from language input and from form-focused activities. Language Teaching, 42(3), 341–354. DOI:10.1017/s0261444809005771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26. DOI:10.1093/applin/22.1.1.Google Scholar
Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37–63. DOI:10.1017/S0272263103000020.Google Scholar
Li, J., Link, S. & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18. DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2012). The role of feedback. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 24–40). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183–218. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00019.x.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 51–81. DOI:10.1017/S027226319800103X.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. DOI:10.1017/S0272263197001034.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. DOI:10.1017/s0272263109990520.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K. & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. DOI:10.1017/s0261444812000365.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Al-Khalil, M., Atanassova, G., Hama, M., Logan-Terry, A. & Nakatsukasa, K. (2007). Teachers’ intentions and learners’ perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 129–152. DOI:10.2167/illt047.0.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Gass, S. & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. DOI:10.1017/S0272263100004022.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 408–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (ed.). (2011). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meara, P. M. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, 13(4), 221–246. DOI:10.1017/S0261444800008879.Google Scholar
Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 677–711. DOI:10.1017/s0272263114000825.Google Scholar
Nakata, T. & Webb, S. (2016). Does studying vocabulary in smaller sets increase learning? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 523–552. DOI:10.1017/s0272263115000236.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (eds.). (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51(4), 719–758. DOI:10.1111/0023-8333.00172.Google Scholar
Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. DOI:10.1111/0023-8333.00136.Google Scholar
Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS–NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 99–126. DOI:10.1017/S0272263103000044.Google Scholar
Qi, D. S. & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 277–303. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P. & Nakata, T. (2017). The timing of oral corrective feedback. In Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 35–47). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. A. (1995). Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In Schmidt, R. W. (ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 163–182). Manoa, HI: Second Language Teaching Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Santos, M., López-Serrano, S. & Manchón, R. M. (2010). The differential effects of two types of direct written corrective feedback on noticing and uptake: Reformulation vs. error correction. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 131–154. DOI:10.6018/ijes.10.1.114011.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. DOI:10.1093/applin/11.2.129.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300. DOI:10.1191/1362168804lr146oa.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361–392. DOI:10.1191/1362168806lr203oa.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835–874. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 203–234. DOI:10.1017/s0272263109990507.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 593–610). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x.Google Scholar
Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334. DOI:10.1017/s0272263109990532.Google Scholar
Suzuki, W. (2012). Written languaging, direct correction, and second language writing revision. Language Learning, 62(4), 1110–1133. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00720.x.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. & DeKeyser, R. (2017). Effects of distributed practice on the proceduralization of morphology. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 166–188. DOI:10.1177/1362168815617334.Google Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. DOI:10.1093/applin/16.3.371.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A. & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts?: The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 171–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14(2), 103–135. DOI:10.1191/026765898674803209.Google Scholar
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H. & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1985). Communicative value and information processing in second language acquisition. In Judd, E., Nelson, P., & Messerschmitt, D. (eds.), On TESOL ’84: A brave new world (pp. 88–99). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 269–304. DOI:10.1017/S0272263105050138.Google Scholar

References

Adolphs, S. & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 425–438.Google Scholar
Ammar, A. & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543–574.Google Scholar
Baker, A. & Burri, M. (2016). Feedback on second language pronunciation: A case study of EAP teachers’ beliefs and practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In Bohn, O., & Munro, M. (eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R. & Tohkura, Y. I. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310.Google Scholar
Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436–458.Google Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R., Best, C., Kroos, C. & Tyler, M. (2012). Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 643–664.Google Scholar
Carpenter, H., Jeon, K. S., MacGregor, D. & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 209–236.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., Goodwin, J. & Griner, B. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Bot, K. (1983). Visual feedback of intonation: I. Effectiveness and induced practice behaviour. Language and Speech, 26(4), 331–350.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In Williams, J.. & VanPatten, B. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
Dilāns, G. (2010). Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), 787–815.Google Scholar
Dlaska, A. & Krekeler, C. (2013). The short-term effects of individual corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation. System, 41(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H. & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281–318.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 575–600.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (2016). The role of phonetic category formation in second language speech acquisition. Plenary address delivered at New Sounds, Aarhus University, Denmark, June 10–12, 2016.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M. & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134.Google Scholar
Goo, J. & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 127–165.Google Scholar
Gooch, R., Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2016). Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English [r] to Korean adult EFL learners. System, 60, 117–127.Google Scholar
Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343.Google Scholar
Hahn, L. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223.Google Scholar
Hincks, R. (2003). Speech technologies for pronunciation feedback and evaluation. ReCALL, 15(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
Hincks, R. & Edlund, J. (2009). Promoting increased pitch variation in oral presentations with transient visual feedback. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 32–50.Google Scholar
Huang, X. & Jia, X. O. (2016). Corrective feedback on pronunciation: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(6), 245.Google Scholar
Isaacs, T., (2008). Towards defining a valid assessment criterion of pronunciation proficiency in non-native English-speaking graduate students. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 555–580.Google Scholar
Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P. & Foote, J. A. (2017). Developing a user-oriented second language comprehensibility scale for English-medium universities. Language Testing, 35(2), 193–216. DOI: 10.1177/0265532217703433.Google Scholar
Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P. & Foote, J. A. (2018). Developing a user-oriented second language comprehensibility scale for English-medium universities. Language Testing, 35, 193–216.Google Scholar
Joly-Pottuz, B., Mercier, M., Leynaud, A. & Habib, M. (2008). Combined auditory and articulatory training improves phonological deficit in children with dyslexia. Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 18(4), 402–429.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D. & Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of English language learner proficiency in oral English, Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566.Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Han, Z. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap? In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Series of Empirical Studies (pp. 269–297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kissling, E. M. (2013). Teaching pronunciation: Is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners? Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 720–744.Google Scholar
Kissling, E. M. (2014). What predicts the effectiveness of foreign-language pronunciation instruction? Investigating the role of perception and other individual differences. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70, 532–558.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97(22), 11850–11857.Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2005). Error correction: Students’ versus teachers’ perceptions. Language Awareness, 14(2), 112–127.Google Scholar
Lee, A. H. & Lyster, R. (2016a). The effects of corrective feedback on instructed L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 35–64.Google Scholar
Lee, A. H. & Lyster, R. (2016b). Effects of different types of corrective feedback on receptive skills in a second language: A speech perception training study. Language Learning, 66, 809–833.Google Scholar
Lee, A. H. & Lyster, R. (2017). Can corrective feedback on second language speech perception errors affect production accuracy? Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 371–393.Google Scholar
Lee, B., Plonsky, L. & Saito, K. (2020). The effects of perception- vs. production-based pronunciation instruction. System. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102185.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Jang, J. & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366.Google Scholar
Li, M. & DeKeyser, R. (2017). Perception practice, production practice, and musical ability in L2 Mandarin tone-word learning. Studies in Second Language Learning, 39(4), 593–620.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97, 634–654.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S. & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91–104.Google Scholar
Logan, J., Lively, S. & Pisoni, D. (1992). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /ɹ/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lord, G. (2005). (How) can we teach foreign language pronunciation? On the effects of a Spanish phonetics course. Hispania, 557–567.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183–218.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 167–184.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Corrective feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K. & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Gass, S. & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356.Google Scholar
McCandliss, B. D., Fiez, J. A., Protopapas, A., Conway, M. & McClelland, J. L. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 89–108.Google Scholar
Moskovsky, C., Assulaimani, T., Racheva, S. & Harkins, J. (2016). The L2 motivational self system and L2 achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 641–654.Google Scholar
Munro, M. & Derwing, T. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520–531.Google Scholar
Munro, M. & Derwing, T. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502.Google Scholar
Nagle, C. (2018). Motivation, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: Investigating motivation as a time-varying predictor of pronunciation development. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 199–217.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., Pham, T. & Pham, M. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 416–434.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51(4), 719–758.Google Scholar
Parlak, Ö. & Ziegler, N. (2017). The impact of recasts on the development of primary stress in a synchronous computer-mediated environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(2), 257–285.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2013). The acquisitional value of recasts in instructed second language speech learning: Teaching the perception and production of English /ɹ/ to adult Japanese learners. Language Learning, 63(3), 499–529.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2015a). Variables affecting the effects of recasts on L2 pronunciation development. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 276–300.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2015b). Communicative focus on L2 phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 377–409.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2017). Effects of sound, vocabulary and grammar learning aptitude on adult second language speech attainment in foreign language classrooms. Language Learning, 67(3), 665–693.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2018). Advanced segmental and suprasegmental acquisition. In P. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 282–303). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2019). Individual differences in second language speech learning in classroom settings: Roles of awareness in the longitudinal development of Japanese learners’ English /ɹ/ pronunciation. Second Language Research, 35(2), 149–172.Google Scholar
Saito, K. & Akiyama, Y. (2017). Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 67(1), 43–74.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Dewaele, J.-M. & Hanzawa, K. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between motivation and late second language speech learning in classroom settings. Language and Speech, 60(4), 614–632.Google Scholar
Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2012a). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of [r] by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633.Google Scholar
Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2012b). Investigating pedagogical potential of recasts for L2 vowel acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 387–398.Google Scholar
Saito, K. & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Sun, H. & Tierney, A. (2019). Explicit and implicit aptitude effects on second language speech learning: Scrutinizing segmental, prosodic and temporal sensitivity and performance via behavioral and neurophysiological measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1123–1140.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Suzuki, S., Oyama, T. & Akiyama, Y. (2019). How does longitudinal interaction differentially promote experienced vs. inexperienced learners’ L2 speech learning? Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319884981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P. & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P. & Isaacs, T. (2017). Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 439–462.Google Scholar
Saito, K. & Wu, X. (2014). Communicative focus on form and L2 suprasegmental learning: Teaching Cantonese learners to perceive Mandarin tones. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(4), 647–680.Google Scholar
Sakai, M. & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA‐Colombia. Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361–392.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835–874.Google Scholar
Solon, M., Long, A. Y. & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2017). Task complexity, language-related episodes, and production of L2 Spanish vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(2), 347–380.Google Scholar
Suzukida, Y. & Saito, K. (2019). Which segmental features matter for successful L2 comprehensibility? Revisiting and generalizing the pedagogical value of the Functional Load principle. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819858246.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755–803.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past-tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 235–263.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. & Granena, G. (2016). The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 147–161.Google Scholar
Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78–93.Google Scholar

References

Ajabshir, Z. F. (2014). The effect of implicit and explicit types of feedback on learners’ pragmatic development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 463–471.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996). Pragmatics and language teaching: Bringing pragmatics and pedagogy together. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 7, 21–39.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). The interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(4), 677–713.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2009). Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 59(4), 755–795.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(Suppl. 1), 68–86.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2015). Operationalizing conversation in studies of instructional effects in L2 pragmatics. System, 48, 21–34.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2017). Acquisition of pragmatics. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), Handbook of instructed SLA (pp. 224–245). New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2018a). Matching modality in L2 pragmatics research. System, 75, 13–22.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2018b). Pragmatic awareness in second language acquisition. In Garret, P. & Maria Cots, J. (eds.), Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 323–338). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2019). Routines in L2 pragmatics research. In Taguchi, N. (ed.), Handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 47–62). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–259.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33(3), 401–415.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Hartford, B. S. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 279–304.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Su, Y. (2018). The acquisition of conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource in Chinese as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 102(4), 732–757.Google Scholar
Barekat, B. & Mehri, M. (2013). Investigating effects of metalinguistic feedback in L2 pragmatic instruction. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(2), 197–208.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (ed.). (1997). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368.Google Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199–208.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. & Cohen, A. D. (2012). Teaching pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: Grammar as a communicative resource. Hispania, 95(4), 650–669.Google Scholar
Fukuya, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2002). Effects of recasts on EFL learners’ acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies, 21(1), 1–47.Google Scholar
Fukuya, Y. J. & Zhang Hill, Y. (2006). The effects of recasting on the production of pragmalinguistic conventions of request by Chinese learners of English. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 59–91.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1997). Input, Interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2016). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity: A replication. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O. & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 276–302). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y. & Novella, M. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. In Rebuschat, P. (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (Vol. IV, pp. 443–483). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goo, J. & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 127–165.Google Scholar
Guo, L. (2013). Effects of recasts and metalinguistic feedback on developing ESL learners’ pragmatic competence. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Holden, C. L. & Sykes, J. M. (2013). Complex L2 pragmatic feedback via place-based mobile games. In Taguchi, N. & Sykes, J. M. (eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 155–170). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. (2007). Web-based curriculum for pragmatics instruction in Japanese as a foreign language: An explicit awareness-raising approach. Language Awareness, 16(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. & Cohen, A. D. (2014). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (1997). The role of pragmatics in language teacher education. In Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Hartford, B. S. (eds.), Beyond methods: Components of language teacher education (pp. 113–136). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In Rose, K. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koike, D. & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33(3), 481–501.Google Scholar
Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37–63.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 361–377). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In De Bot, K., Ginsberg, R. & Kramsch, C. (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59(3), 453–498.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K. & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking Theory, Research and Practice. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. T. T., Do, H. T., Nguyen, A. T. & Pham, T. T. (2015). Teaching email requests in the academic context: A focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 24(2), 169–195.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. T. T., Do, H. T., Nguyen, A. T. & Pham, T.T. (2017). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight-month investigation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) early access.Google Scholar
Nipaspong, P. & Chinokul, S. (2010). The role of prompts and explicit feedback in raising EFL learners’ pragmatic awareness. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5, 101–146.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1988). Interlanguage adjustments as outcome of NS–NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 38(1), 45–73.Google Scholar
Ranta, L. & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The awareness-practice-feedback sequence. In DeKeyser, R. (ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45(2), 283–331.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learners’ uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50.Google Scholar
Takenoya, M. (2003). Terms of address in Japanese: An interlanguage pragmatics approach. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press.Google Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback and form-meaning processing on the development of pragmatic proficiency in consciousness-raising tasks. System, 34(4), 601–614.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–111.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183–204.Google Scholar
Washburn, G. (2001). Using situation comedies for pragmatic language teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 10(4), 21–26.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2012). The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning, 62(4), 1134–1169.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). The relative effectiveness of mixed, explicit and implicit feedback. System, 41(3), 691–705.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2016a). The effectiveness of explicit correction under two different feedback exposure conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 65–96.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2016b). The linguistic environment, interaction and negative feedback. Brill Research Perspectives in Multilingualism and Second Language Acquisition, 1, 45–86.Google Scholar
Yoshimi, D. R. (2001). Explicit instruction and JFL learners’ use of interactional discourse markers. In Rose, K. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 223–244). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Adrián, J. A., Alegria, J. & Morais, J. (1995). Metaphonological abilities of Spanish illiterate adults. International Journal of Psychology, 30(3), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010). F-10 Curriculum: English. www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/english/.Google Scholar
Bigelow, M., Delmas, R., Hansen, K. & Tarone, E. (2006). Literacy and the processing of oral recasts in SLA. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 665–689.Google Scholar
Bigelow, M. & Tarone, E. (2004). Doesn’t who we study determine what we know? TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 689–700.Google Scholar
Castro-Caldas, A., Petersson, K. M., Reis, A., Stone-Elander, S. & Ingvar, M. (1998). The illiterate brain: Learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult brain. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 121(6), 1053–1063. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9648541.Google Scholar
Castro-Caldas, A., Miranda, P. C., Canno, L., Reis, A., Leote, F., Ribero, C. & Ducla-Soares, E. (1999). Influence of learning to read and write on the morphology of the corpus callosum. European Journal of Neurology, 6(1), 23–28.Google Scholar
Dellatolas, G., Braga, L. W., Souza, L. D. N., Nunes Filho, G., Queiroz, E., & Deloche, G. (2003). Cognitive consequences of early phase of literacy. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9(5), 771–782.Google Scholar
Hansen, K. (2005). Impact of literacy level and task type on oral L2 recall accuracy. MA thesis, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.Google Scholar
Kurvers, J., Vallen, T. & van Hout, R. (2006). Discovering language: Metalinguistic awareness of adult illiterates. In van de Craats, I., Kurvers, J. & Young-Scholten, M. (eds.), Low-educated second language and literacy acquisition: Proceedings of the inaugural symposium (pp. 69–88). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
LaScotte, D. & Tarone, E. (2019). Heteroglossia and constructed dialogue in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 103, 95–112.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in second language acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.Google Scholar
Martin-Mejía, C. (2011). Low-literacy adult English language learners: Oral recall and recasts. MA thesis, School of Education, Hamline University, St. Paul, Minnesota. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/460/.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegría, J. & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7(4), 323–331.Google Scholar
Mueller, R. (2013). How do context and low L1 literacy of non-native speakers of English affect their noticing of L2 learner recasts? MA thesis, School of Education, Hamline University, St. Paul, Minnesota. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/531/.Google Scholar
Nelson Australia (2003). The PM Benchmark Kit. Toronto: Thomson Learning Australia.Google Scholar
Ngo, B., Bigelow, M. & Lee, S. (2014) What does it mean to do ethical and engaged research with immigrant communities? Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education: Studies of Migration, Integration, Equity, and Cultural Survival, Special Issue, 8(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
Oliver, R. & Steele, C. (2019). Can print literacy impact upon learning to speak Standard Australian English? In Lenzing, A., Nicholas, H. & Roos, J. (eds.), Widening contexts for processability theory: Theories and issues (pp. 349–369). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 257–281.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C., Van Dyke, J. & Hat, L. (2001). The psycholinguistics of basic literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 127–149.Google Scholar
Pettitt, N. & Tarone, E. (2015). Following Roba: What happens when a low-educated adult immigrant learns to read. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 20–38.Google Scholar
Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 99–126.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 217–243.Google Scholar
Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H. & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic spelling. Cognition, 24(1–2), 31–44.Google Scholar
Reis, A. & Castro-Caldas, A. (1997). Illiteracy: A cause for biased cognitive development. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(5), 444–450.Google Scholar
Richwine, J. (2017). Immigrant literacy: Self-assessment vs. reality. Center for Immigration Studies (June 2017). https://cis.org/Immigrant-Literacy-Self-Assessment-vs-Reality.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner. In Day, R. (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2010). Introduction: The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 169–179.Google Scholar
Steele, C. (2014) Can print literacy impact upon learning to speak Standard Australian English? MA dissertation, Curtin University, Australia.Google Scholar
Strube, S. (2007). Recasts and learner uptake: The non-literate adult L2 classroom during oral skills practice. In Young-Scholten, Martha (ed.), Proceedings of the Third annual LESLLA Forum (pp. 61–74). Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University. Available at www.leslla.org.Google Scholar
Strube, S. (2014). Grappling with the oral skills: The learning and teaching of the low-literate adult second language learner. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. & Bigelow, M. (2007). Impact of literacy on oral language processing: Implications for second language acquisition research. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 101–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E., Bigelow, M. & Hansen, K. (2009). Literacy and second language oracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E., Swierzbin, B. & Bigelow, M. (2006). The impact of literacy level on features of interlanguage in oral narratives. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 6(3), 65–77.Google Scholar
UNESCO eAtlas of Literacy (2017). https://tellmaps.com/uis/literacy/#!/tellmap/-601865091.Google Scholar
Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. (2012). The straight and narrow path. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(3), 319–323.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, P. E. (2012). “You just get a deeper understanding of things by talking:” Study circles for teachers of ESL emergent readers. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 1, 34–48.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, P. E. (2016). Crossing contexts for teacher learning: Adult ESL teachers in kindergarten. In Crandall, J. A. & Christison, M. A. (eds.), Teacher education and professional development in TESOL: Global perspectives (pp. 161–175). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, P. E. & Bigelow, M. (2010). Using oral language skills to build literacy of adult learners with emerging English literacy. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×