Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Frontispiece
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Values
- Part II Modalities
- Part III Institutions
- Part IV Challenges for Constitutional Democracy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2025
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Frontispiece
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Values
- Part II Modalities
- Part III Institutions
- Part IV Challenges for Constitutional Democracy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory , pp. 1089 - 1210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The Concept of Legalization. International Organization, 54 (3), 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries: The RIT Model. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670 (1), 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abebe, A. (2020). The Vulnerability of Constitutional Pacts: Inclusive Majoritarianism as Protection Against Democratic Backsliding. In Abebe, A. et al., eds., Annual Review of Constitution-Building 2019. Stockholm: International IDEA, pp. 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abendroth, W. (1968). Zum Begriff des demokratischen und sozialen Rechtsstaates im Grundgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Forsthoff, E., ed., Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Sozialstaatlichkeit. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 114–144.Google Scholar
Åberg, J., & Sedelius, T. (2018). A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results and Missing Pieces. British Journal of Political Science, 50 (3), 1111–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abidi, N., & Miquel-Flores, I. (2018). Who Benefits from the Corporate QE? A Regression Discontinuity Design Approach. ECB Working Paper No. 2145. Frankfurt-am-Main: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory, 36 (1), 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, A. (2019). In Defense of Imperfection: An Election-Sortition Compromise. In Gastil, J., & Wright, E. O. eds., Legislatures by Lot. Transformative Design for Deliberative Governance. London and New York: Verso, pp. 249–255.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, A. (2021a). Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers. American Political Science Review, 115 (3), 742–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, A. (2021b). Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly. Perspectives on Politics, 19 (3), 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, A. (2023). The Grammar of Social Power: Power-to, Power-with, Power-despite, and Power-over. Political Studies, 71 (1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ablavsky, G. (2018). The Rise of Federal Title. California Law Review, 106 (3), 631–695.Google Scholar
Abolafia, M. Y. (2010). Narrative Construction as Sensemaking: How a Central Bank Thinks. Organization Studies, 31 (3), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abolafia, M. Y. (2012). Central Banking and the Triumph of Technical Rationality. In Knorr-Cetina, K., & Preda, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–112.Google Scholar
Abou El-Fadl, R. (2019). Building Egypt’s Afro-Asian Hub: Infrastructures of Solidarity and the 1957 Cairo Conference. Journal of World History, 30 (1–2), 157–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramovich, V., & Courtis, C. (2002). Los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles, Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Abramovich, V., & Courtis, C. (2009). Apuntes sobre la exigibilidad judicial de los derechos sociales. In Gargarella, R., ed., Teoría y crítica del derecho constitucional. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2009). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The Narrow Corridor: How Nations Struggle for Liberty, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Achen, C., & Bartels, L. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. (1991). We the People: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (1998). We the People: Transformations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2000). The New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, 113 (3), 633–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2004). The Emergency Constitution. Yale Law Journal, 113 (5), 1029–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2006). Before the Next Attack: Preserving Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2011). Lost Inside the Beltway: A Reply to Professor Morrison. Harvard Law Review Forum, 124 (13), 13–41.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2014). We the People: The Civil Rights Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2018). We The People Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2019). Revolutionary Constitutions: Charismatic Leadership and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Adler, M. (2009). Social Facts, Constitutional Interpretation and the Rule of Recognition. In Adler, M., & Himma, K. E., eds., The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 193–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, M. (2012). Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, M. (2016). Benefit-Cost Analysis and Distributional Weights. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10 (2), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, M. (2019). Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, M., & Posner, E. (2006). New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Admati, A., & Hellwig, M. (2014). The Bankers’ New Clothes: What’s Wrong with Banking and What to Do about It, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolph, C. (2013). Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AfD. (2017). Manifesto for Germany. The Political Programme of the Alternative for Germany.Google Scholar
Affolder, N. (2021). Transnational Climate Law. In Zumbansen, P., ed., Oxford Handbook of Transnational Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afilalo, A (2001). Constitutionalization Through the Back Door: A European Perspective on NAFTA’s Investment Chapter. NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, 34 (1), 1–55.Google Scholar
Afonso Da Silva, V. (2013). Deciding without Deliberating. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (3), 557–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacre: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. by D. Heller-Roazen. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. Translated by Kevin Attell. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (2014). What Is a Destituent Power? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32 (1), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agirdag, O. (2014). The Long-Term Effects of Bilingualism on Children of Immigration: Student Bilingualism and Future Earnings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17 (4), 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrama, H. A. (2012). Questioning Secularism: Islam, Sovereignty, and the Rule of Law in Modern Egypt, Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, A. (2012). Democracy and the Politics of Electoral System Choice: Engineering Electoral Dominance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, F. (2021). The Delegation Theory of Judicial Review. Modern Law Review, 84 (4), 772–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, F., & Jhaveri, S. (2021). Deconstitutionalising and Localising Administrative Law in India. In Jhaveri, S., & Ramsden, M., eds., Judicial Review of Administrative Action across the Common Law World: Origins and Adaptations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, F, & Perry, A. (2014). The Quasi-Entrenchment of Constitutional Statutes. Cambridge Law Journal, 73 (3), 514–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, F., & Perry, A. (2018). Standing and Civic Virtue. Law Quarterly Review, 134 (April), pp. 239–256.Google Scholar
Albert, R. (2009). The Fusion of Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 57 (3), 531–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R. (2010). Constitutional Handcuffs. Arizona State Law Review, 42 (3), 664–716.Google Scholar
Albert, R. (2013). The Expressive Function of Constitutional Amendment Rules. McGill Law Journal, 59 (2), 225–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R. (2014a). The Importance of Constitutional Amendment by Constitutional Desuetude. American Journal of Comparative Law, 62 (3), 641–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R. (2014b). The Structure of Constitutional Amendment Rules. Wake Forest Law Review, 49 (4), 913–976.Google Scholar
Albert, R. (2015). Amending Constitutional Amendment Rules. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13 (3), 655–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R. (2019). Constitutional Amendments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albi, A., & Bardutzky, S. (2019). Revisiting the Role and Future of National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Introduction to the Research Project. In Albi, A., & Bardutzky, S., eds., National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleinikoff, A. (1987). Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing. Yale Law Journal, 96 (5), 943–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleinikoff, A. (2002). Semblances of Sovereignty: The Constitution, the State, and American Citizenship, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, E., & Tsebelis, G., eds. (2016). Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L. (2009). Constitutionalism. In Christiano, T., & Christman, J., eds., Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. (2005). Balancing, Constitutional Review, and Representation. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3 (4), 572–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Fahad, A. (2005). Ornamental Constitutionalism: The Saudi Basic Law of Governance. The Yale Journal of International Law, 30 (2), 375–396.Google Scholar
Al-Hout, S. (2006). My Life in the PLO: The Inside Story of the Palestinian Struggle, New York: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. (1994). Law, Liberty and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. (2003). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. (2013). The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. S., (2004). Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allinson, J. (2019). A Fifth Generation of Revolution Theory? Journal of Historical Sociology, 32 (1), 142–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, K. (2001). Establishing the Supremacy of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, K. (2014). The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alterio, A. M. (2019). Reactive vs Structural Approach: A Public Law Response to Populism. Global Constitutionalism, 8 (2), 270–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusius, J. (1995 [1603]). Politica Methodice Digesta, Atque Exemplis Sacris et Profanis Illustrata. Edited and translated by Frederick S. Carney. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Altman, D. (2010). Direct Democracy Worldwide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J. (2003). The New Dispute Settlers: Half-Truths and Consequences. Texas International Law Journal, 38 (3), 405–444.Google Scholar
Amar, A. R. (2012). America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
American Bar Association, Special Committee on Administrative Law. (1938). Annual Reports of the American Bar Association 63, 331–368.Google Scholar
American Immigration Council. (2010). The Ones They Leave Behind: Deportation of Lawful Permanent Residents Harm U.S. Citizen Children. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20201028021851/ www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/ones-they-leave-behind-deportation-lawful-permanent-residents-harm-us-citizen-children [Viewed 4 January 2020].Google Scholar
American National Election Studies. (2020). Available from: https://electionstudies.org/data-center/.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2010). The Imperative of Integration, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2017). Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why we Don’t Talk about It), Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, R. (2014). Illegality, Inc.: Clandestine Migration and the Business of Bordering Europe, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Andeweg, R. B. (2015). Consociationalism. In Wright, J. D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, vol. IV. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 692–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, R. B. (2019). Consociationalism in the Low Countries: Comparing the Dutch and Belgian Experience. Swiss Political Science Review, 25 (4), 408–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankersmit, F. R. (2002). Political Representation, Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1981). Rules, Rights, and Promises. In Ethics, Religion, and Politics: Collected Philosophical Papers. Vol III. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
APSA. (1950). Summary of Conclusions and Proposals. American Political Science Review, 44 (3), Part 2, Supplement, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2000a). Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2000b). The New Democracies and American Constitutional Design. Constellations, 7 (3), 316–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2016). Post Sovereign Constitution Making: Legitimacy and Learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2017). The Adventures of the Constituent Power: Beyond Revolutions? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2019). Populism, Constitutional Courts, and Civil Society. In Landfried, C., ed., Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 318–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2020). How We Got Here? Transition Failures, Their Causes and the Populist Interest in the Constitution. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45 (9–10), 1106–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A., & Cohen, J. (2021). Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arban, E., Bottini, E., & Samararatne, D. (2020). Bruce Ackerman, Revolutionary Constitutions: Charismatic Leadership and the Rule of Law, Belknap Press: Harvard University Press, 2019. Modern Law Review, 83 (5), 1108–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H. (1970). Reflections on civil disobedience. The New Yorker. 12 September. pp. 70–105.Google Scholar
Arendt, H., (1998). The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1906). The Nichomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Translated by F. H. Peters, 10th edn, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1975). Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by H. Rackman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1996). The Politics: In The Politics and The Constitution of Athens. Edited by Everson, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2000). Nicomachean Ethics. Edited and translated by Roger Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (2009). Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by David Ross. Edited by Brown, Lesley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armitage, D. (2014). Foreword. In Palmer, R. R., (ed.),(2014). The Age of the Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. xv–xxii.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. J. (2004). Luck Egalitarianism Interpreted and Defended. Philosophical Topics, 32 (1/2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, A. (2010). Monetary Theory and Policy from Hume and Smith to Wicksell: Money, Credit, and the Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroney, N. (2007). The Constitution of a Federal Commonwealth: The Making and Meaning of the Australian Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aroney, N. (2015). Law and Convention. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroney, N., et al. (2015). The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia: History, Principle and Interpretation, Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroney, N. (2019). The Federal Condition. In Lev, A., ed., The Federal Idea: Public Law between Governance and Political Life. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
Asad, T. (2012). Thinking about Religious Belief and Politics. In Orsi, R., ed., Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36–57.Google Scholar
Aspinall, E. (2011). Democratization and Ethnic Politics in Indonesia: Nine Theses. Journal of East Asian Studies, 11 (2), 289–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. (1861). Lectures on Jurisprudence, or The Philosophy of Positive Law, 2nd edn, volume I, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1885). Lectures on Jurisprudence, or The Philosophy of Positive Law, 5th edn, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (2000). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Austin, L., & Klimchuk, D., eds. (2014). The Rule of Law and Private Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Election Commission. (© 2018). Compulsory voting. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20180715211955/ www.aec.gov.au/Voting/Compulsory_Voting.htm [Viewed 15 July 2018].Google Scholar
Avineri, S. (1971). The Social & Political Thought of Karl Marx, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Avril, P. (1997). Les conventions de la constitution, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydın, A. (2013). Judicial Independence across Democratic Regimes: Understanding the Varying Impact of Political Competition. Law & Society Review, 47 (1), 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydogan, A. (2019). Constitutional Foundations of Military Coups. Political Science Quarterly, 134 (1), 85–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azoulai, L., & Rasnača, Z. (2016). The Court of Justice of the European Union as a Self-Made Statesmen. In Patterson, D., & Södersten, A., eds., A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 166–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, S. (2003). Platypus and parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice, Canberra: Department of the Senate.Google Scholar
Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2016). Multi-level Governance. In Ansell, C., & Torfing, J., eds., Handbook on Theories of Governance. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 486–498.Google Scholar
Bader, R. M. (2018). Moralized Conceptions of Liberty. In Schmidtz, D., & Pavel, C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
Badura, P. (1967). Das Verwaltungsrecht des liberalen Rechtsstaates, Goettingen: Verlag Otto Schwartz.Google Scholar
Baer, S. (2018). The Rule of – and Not by Any – Law. On Constitutionalism. Current Legal Problems, 71 (1), 335–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, M., Campiglio, E., & Deyris, J. (2021). It Takes Two to Dance: Institutional Dynamics and Climate-Related Financial Policies. Ecological Economics, 190, 107210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagehot, W. (2001 [1867]). The English Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. (2013). The New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift. New Political Economy, 18 (1), 112–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, E. C. (2007). Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., & Black, J. (2010). Really Responsive Risk Based Regulation. Law and Policy, 32 (2), 181–213.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2010). Oxford Handbook of Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. (2011). Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, L. (1993). What Determines the Sacrifice Ratio? Working Paper No. 4306. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Banai, A. (2013). Language Recognition and Fair Terms of Inclusion: Minority Languages in the European Union. In de Latour, S. G., & Balint, P., eds., Liberal Multiculturalism and the Fair Terms of Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, A. (2015). Canada. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, S. (2007). How the Indians Lost Their Land: Law and Power on the Frontier, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baradaran, M. (2017). The Color of Money: Black Banks and the Racial Wealth Gap, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barak, A. (2015). Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranger, D. (2018). Penser La Loi: Essai sur le législateur des temps modernes, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1984). Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barber, N. (2004). Must Legalistic Conceptions of the Rule of Law Have a Social Dimension? Ratio Juris, 17 (4), 474–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N. (2016). Why Entrench? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (2), 325–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N. (2018). The Principles of Constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N. (2019). The Two Europes. In Cahill, M., Ekins, R., & Barber, N. W., eds., The Rise and Fall of the European Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barère, B. (2002 [1794]). Rapport du comité de salut public sur les idiomes. In de Certeau, M., Julia, D., & Revel, J., eds., Une politique de la langue. La Révolution française et les patois: l’enquête de Grégoire. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 323–331.Google Scholar
Barnett, H. (2002). Constitutional and Administrative Law, 4th edn, London: Cavendish Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, R. (2003). Constitutional Legitimacy. Columbia Law Review, 103 (1), 111–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, R. (2004). Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barontini, C., & Holden, H. (2019). Proceeding with Caution: A Survey on Central Bank Digital Currency, Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Barradas de Freitas, R. (2016). Three Questions for Moderate Sceptics. Analisi e Diritto, 305–319.Google Scholar
Barritt, E., & Sediti, B. (2019). The Symbolic Value of Leghari v Federation of Pakistan: Climate Change Adjudication in the Global South. King’s Law Journal, 20 (2), 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroso, L. R. (2012). Here, There, and Everywhere: Human Dignity in Contemporary Law and in the Transnational Discourse. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 35 (2), 331–393.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1975). Political Accommodation and Consociational Democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 5 (4), 477–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, N., & Miragliotta, N. (2015). Australia. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, J., Goldstein, J., Josling, T., & Steinberg, R. (2008). The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, W. (2020). Public Finance and Parliamentary Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D. W. (2012). States of War: Enlightenment Origins of the Political, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Baturo, A. (2014). Democracy, Dictatorship, and Term Limits, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baturo, A., & Elgie, R., eds. (2019). The Politics of Presidential Term Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauböck, R. (1994). Transnational Citizenship: Membership and Rights in International Migration, Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Baume, S., Boillet, V., & Martenet, V., eds. (2021). Misinformation in Referenda, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baynes, K. (2000). Rights as Critique and the Critique of Rights: Karl Marx, Wendy Brown, and the Social Function of Rights. Political Theory, 28 (4), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC News. (2019). Citizenship Amendment Bill: India’s New “anti-Muslim” Law Explained. 11 December. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20201129115229/ www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50670393 [Viewed 29 November 2020]Google Scholar
BBC News. (2020). Windrush Generation: Who Are They and Why Are They Facing Problems? 31 July. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20200825024907/ www.bbc.com/news/uk-43782241 [Viewed 25 August 2020].Google Scholar
Beard, C. (1913). An Economic Interpretation of the Origins of the Constitution of the United States, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beaud, O. (1999). Le Sang contaminé. Essai critique sur la criminalisation de la responsabilité des gouvernants, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Beaud, O. (2005). De quelques particularités de la justice constitutionnelle dans un système federal. In Grewe, C., Jouanjan, O., Maulin, E., & Wachsmann, P., eds., La notion de la “justice constitutionnelle”. Paris: Dalloz, pp. 49–72.Google Scholar
Beaud, O. (2013). Conceptions of the State. In Rosenfeld, M., & Sajó, A., eds., Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–282.Google Scholar
Beaud, O. (2017). The Founding Constitution Reflections on the Constitution of a Federation and Its Peculiarity. Jus Politicum; Revue de Droit Politique, 17, 33–63.Google Scholar
Becchi, P. (2019). Manifesto sovranista. Per la liberazione dei popoli europei, Rome: Giubilei Regnani.Google Scholar
Becher, M., & Stegmuller, D. (2021). Reducing Unequal Representation: Labor Unions and Equal Representation: The Impact of Labor Unions on Legislative Responsiveness in the U. S. Congress. Perspectives on Politics, 19 (1), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedau, H. (1968). On Civil Disobedience. Journal of Philosophy, 58 (21), 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beers, D. J. (2012). Judicial Self-Governance and the Rule of Law: Evidence from Romania and the Czech Republic. Problems of Post-Communism, 59 (5), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, D. (2013). The Legitimation of Power, 2nd edn, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C. (2013). Human Dignity in the Theory of Human Rights: Nothing but a Phrase? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 41 (3), 259–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. (1978). The Referendum: Democracy’s Barrier to Racial Equality. Washington Law Review, 54 (1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Bell, J., Elliott, M., Murray, P., & Varuhas, J., eds. (2016). Public Law Adjudication in the Common Law World: Process and Substance, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (1999). Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. ed. (2005). The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2007). Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2011). Political Constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9 (1), 86–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2012). Rights as Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15 (4), 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2014a). Croce, Gramsci, Bobbio and the Italian Political Tradition, Colchester: ECPR Press/Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2014b). The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Conventions: Political Constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 25 (4), 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2015). Rights, Democracy and Republicanism. In Nierderberger, A., ed., Republican Democracy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press, pp. 253–275.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2016). Turtles All the Way Down? Is the Political Constitutionalist Appeal to Disagreement Self-Defeating? A Reply to Cormac Mac Amhlaigh. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (1), 204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2019). A Republican Europe of States. Cosmopolitanism, Intergovernmentalism, and Democracy in the EU, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2023). Political Constitutionalism and Referendums: The Case of Brexit. Social & Legal Studies, 32 (6), 973–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In Benhabib, S., ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. (2004). The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, W. (2003). Selected Writings. Volume 4, 1938–1940, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, Steven, eds. (2021). The Disinformation Age: Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1834). Traités de Legislation. Translated as C. K. Ogden ed., The Theory of Legislation. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1843a). Anarchical Fallacies. In Bowring, J., ed., The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. II. Edinburgh: William Tait, pp. 489–534.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1843b). Plan of Parliamentary Reform. Vol. III of Works. Edited by Stark, W.. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1977). A Fragment on Government. In A Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government. Edited by Burns, J. H., & Hart, H. L. A.. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1990). Securities against Misrule and other Constitutional Writings for Tripoli and Greece, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benton, L. (2006). Constitutions and Empires. Law and Social Inquiry, 31 (1), 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, E. (1999). Margin of Appreciation, Consensus and Universal Standards. NYU Journal, 31 (3), 843–854.Google Scholar
Bergallo, P. (2013). El género en el constitucionalismo latinoamericano contemporáneo. Draft on file with the author.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (2013). The Pursuit of the Ideal. In The Crooked Timber of Humanity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, H. J. (1983). Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bermann, G. A., & Picard, E., eds. (2012). An Introduction to French Law, Alpjem aam dem, Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bermeo, N. (2003). Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, A. M. (2017). Beyond Origins: Rethinking Foundings in a Time of Constitutional Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, C. (2022). Plebiscites and Peace: Comparative Lessons from the 2016 Colombian Plebiscite for Peace. In Albert, R., & Stacey, R., eds., The Limits and Legitimacy of Referendums. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernanke, B., Laubach, T., Mishkin, F., & Posen, A. (2001). Inflation Targeting: Lessons from the International Experience, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernhard, L. (2012). Campaign Strategy in Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstorff, J. v. (2019). The Decay of the International Rule of Law Project (1990–2015). In Krieger, H., Nolte, G., & Zimmermann, A., eds., The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, S. (2021). Reconstruire l’ordre institutionnel international, Paris: Fayard, Collège de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, J. (2016). Rethinking Central Bank Accountability in Uncertain Times. Ethics & International Affairs, 30 (2), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, D., Ryan-Collins, J., van Lerven, F., & Zhang, L. (2018). Credit where it’s due: A historical, theoretical and empirical review of credit guidance policies in the 20th century. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper Series No. 2018–11. Retrieved from www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/publications/2018/nov/credit-where-its-due.Google Scholar
Bhargava, R. ed., (1998). Secularism and Its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhat, M. A. (2021). Governing Democracy Outside the Law: India’s Election Commission and the Challenge of Accountability. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 16 (S1), S85–S104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, M. A. (2022). Between Trust and Democracy: The Election Commission of India and the Question of Constitutional Accountability. In Jhaveri, S., Khaitan, T., & Samararatne, D., eds., Constitutional Resilience beyond Courts: Views from South Asia. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Bhatia, G. (2018). The Sole Route to an Independent Judiciary? The Primacy of Judges in Appointment. In Sengupta, A., & Sharma, R., eds., Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India: Transparency, Accountability, and Independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biaggini, G., 2011. Switzerland. In Oliver, D., & Fusaro, C., eds., How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 303–328.Google Scholar
Bickel, A. (1962). The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, A. (1986). The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, 2nd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bilancia, F. (2001). Brevi note su costituzione materiale, legalitá ed Unione Europea. In Catelani, A., & Labriola, S., eds., La costituzione materiale. Milan: Giuffrè, pp. 143–156.Google Scholar
Bilodeau, A., Turgeon, L., White, S., & Henderson, A, (2015). Seeing the Same Canada? Visible Minorities’ Views of the Federation, IRPP Study No.56.Google Scholar
Bindseil, U. (2014). Monetary Policy Operations and the Financial System, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindseil, U., & Papadia, F. (2009). Risk Management and Market Impact of Central Bank Credit Operations. In Bindseil, U., Gonzalez, F., & Tabakis, E., eds., Risk Management for Central Banks and Other Public Investors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIS. (2014). Re-thinking the Lender of Last Resort, Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Bishop, W. (1990). A Theory of Administrative Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 19 (2), 489–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, T. (2009). The Crisis of the Twelfth Century: Power, Lordship, and the Origins of European Government, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, C. (1997). A New Birth of Freedom, Human Rights, Named and Unnamed, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Black, J. (2001). Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World. Current Legal Problems, 54 (1), 103–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (2002). Regulatory Conversations. Journal of Law and Society, 29 (1), 163–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (2003). Enrolling Actors in Regulatory Systems: Examples from UK Financial Services Regulation. Public Law, 63–91.Google Scholar
Black, J. (2008). Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes. Regulation and Governance, 2 (2), 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (2013a). Reconceiving Financial Markets – From the Economic to the Social. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 13 (2), 401–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (2013b). Calling Regulators to Account: Challenges, Capacities and Prospects. In Bamforth, N., & Leyland, P., eds., Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 354–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, W. (1979 [1765–1769]). Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blake, M. (2002). Discretionary Immigration. Philosophical Topics, 30 (2), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, M. (2005). Immigration. In Frey, R. G., & Heath Wellman, C., eds., A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, M. (2013). Immigration, Jurisdiction, and Exclusion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41 (2), 103–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. (2018). Should We Reject the Natural Rate Hypothesis? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32 (1), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O., & Katz, L. F. (1997). What We Know and Do Not Know About the Natural Rate of Unemployment. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O., Cerutti, E., & Summers, L. (2015). Inflation and Activity – Two Explorations and their Monetary Policy Implications. Working Paper No. 21726. National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankenburg, E. (1995). The Purge of Lawyers after the Breakdown of the East German Communist Regime. Law & Social Inquiry, 20 (1), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blick, A. (2012). The Cabinet Manual and the Codification of Conventions. Parliamentary Affairs, 67 (1), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blick, A. (2015). Constitutional Reform. In B. Galligan, & S. Brenton, eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokker, P. (2018). Populist Constitutionalism. In de la Torre, C., ed., Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blokker, P. (2019a). Populism as a Constitutional Project. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (2), 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokker, P. (2019b). Varieties of Populist Constitutionalism: The Transnational Dimension. German Law Journal, 20 (3), 332–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokker, P. (2020). Populist Understandings of the Law: A Conservative Backlash? Participation and Conflict, 13 (3), 1411–1416.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. (1997). Political Opposition in the Contemporary World. Government and Opposition, 32 (4), 462–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, M. C., & Wood, M. C. (2017). “No Ordinary Lawsuit”: Climate Change, Due Process, and the Public Trust Doctrine. American University Law Review, 67 (1), 1–88.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, U.-R. (1988). The Investiture Controversy: Church and Monarchy from the Ninth to the Twelfth Century, Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobek, M., & Kosař, D. (2014). Global Solutions, Local Damages: A Critical Study in Judicial Councils in Central and Eastern Europe. German Law Journal, 15 (7), 171–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (1976). Die Bedeutung der Unterscheidung von Staat und Gesellschaft im demokratischen Sozialstaat der Gegenwart. In Böckenförde, E.-W., ed., Staat, Gesell- schaft, Freiheit, Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 185–220.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (1987). Demokratie als Verfassungsprinzip. In Staat, Verfassung, Demokratie. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 289–378.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (1991). State, Society, and Liberty: Studies in Political Theory and Constitutional Law. Translated by J. Underwood. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (1992). Staat, Verfassung, Demokratie, Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (2017a). Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings. Edited by Kunkler, M., & Stein, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (2017b). The Constituent Power of the People: A Liminal Concept of Constitutional Law. In Kunkler, M., & Stein, T., eds., Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (2020 [1967]). The Rise of the Modern State as a Process of Secularization. In Künkler, M., & Stein, T., eds., Religion, Law, and Democracy: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, J. (1955 [1576]). Six Books of the Commonwealth. Abridged and translated by M. J. Tooley. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bodin, J. (1962 [1576]). The Six Bookes of a Commonweale. Translated by R. Knolles. Edited by McRae, K. D.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, J. (1992 [1576]). On Sovereignty. Edited and translated by J. Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BoE. (2021). Options for greening the Bank of England’s Corporate Bond Purchase Scheme [Discussion Paper]. London: Bank of England.Google Scholar
Bogaards, M. (2005). The Italian First Republic: “Degenerated Consociationalism” in a Polarised Party System. West European Politics, 28 (3), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, M. (2019). Consociationalism and Centripetalism: Friends or Foes? Swiss Political Science Review, 25 (4), 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdandy, A. v., & Schill, S. (2011). Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty. Common Market Law Review, 48 (5), 1417–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdandy, A. v., Huber, P. M., & Grabenwarter, C. (2020). Constitutional Adjudication in the European Legal Space. In Bogdandy, A. v., Huber, P. M., & Grabenwarter, C., eds., Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions, vol. III of The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V. (1981). The People and the Party System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bogg, A., & Estlund, C. (2018). The Right to Strike and Contestatory Citizenship. In Collins, H., Lester, G., & Mantouvalou, V., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolívar, S. (1951). Selected Writings of Bolívar. Compiled by V. Lecuna. Edited by Bierck, H.. Translated by L. Bertrand. New York: The Colonial Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, P., Depres, M., Pereira da Silva, L. A., Samama, F., & Svartzman, R. (2020). The Green Swan: Central Banking and Financial Stability in the Age of Climate change, Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Bonelli, M., & Claes, M. (2018). Judicial Serendipity: How Portuguese Judges Came to the Rescue of the Polish Judiciary (ECJ 27 February 2018, Case C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses). European Constitutional Law Review, 14 (3), pp. 622–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonotti, M. (2017). Partisanship and Political Liberalism in Diverse Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borio, C. (2011). Central Banking Post-crisis: What Compass for Uncharted Water? Bank of International Settlements.Google Scholar
Bork, R. (1971). Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems. Indiana Law Journal, 47 (1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Bork, R. (1979). The Impossibility of Finding Welfare Rights in the Constitution. Washington University Law Quarterly, 1979 (3), 695–702.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. (2013). EU-Staatlichkeit – ein Oxymoron?, Der Staat, Beiheft 21, pp. 221–235.Google Scholar
Bossacoma Busquets, P. (2020). Morality and Legality of Secession: A Theory of National Self-Determination, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosselmann, K. (2013). Grounding the Rule of Law. In Voigt, C., ed., Rule of Law for Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1987). The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal, 38 (5), 805–853.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the State: Lectures at the Collège de France 1989–1992, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bouwer, K. (2018). The Unsexy Future of Climate Change Litigation. Journal of Environmental Law, 30 (3), 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M. (2012). Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13 (4), 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M., Goodin, R., & Schillemans, T., eds. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, S. (2016). The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. R. (2011). The Environmental Rights Revolution, Vancouver: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysen, S. (2019). Remants of a Constitutional Moment: The Right to Democracy in International Law. In von Arnauld, A., von der Decken, K., & Susi, M., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 465–480.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. (2019). Unearthed. Meanjin. Available from: https://meanjin.com.au/essays/unearthed/.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. (1982). The Wheels of Commerce. Vol. II of Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Braun, B. (2015). Governing the Future: The European Central Bank’s Expectation Management during the Great Moderation. Economy and Society, 44 (3), 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, B. (2018). Central Bank Planning? Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Price of Bending the Yield Curve. In Beckert, J., & Bronk, R., eds., Uncertain Futures: Imaginaries, Narratives, and Calculation in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 194–218.Google Scholar
Braun, B. (2020). Central Banking and the Infrastructural Power of Finance: The Case of ECB Support for Repo and Securitization Markets. Socio-Economic Review, 18 (2), 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, B., & Downey, L. (2020). Against Amnesia: Re-Imagining Central Banking. Discussion Note No. 2020/01. Council on Economic Policies.Google Scholar
Brazier, R. (1999). Constitutional Practice: The Foundations of British Government, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredin, J.-D. (1988). Sieyès: La clé de la revolution française, Paris: Editions de Fallois.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1985). The Reason of Rules, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, J. (2009). Polluting the Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87 (4), 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, J., & Hill, L. (2014). Compulsory Voting: For and Against, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brest, P. (1980). The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding. Boston University Law Review, 60 (2), 204–238.Google Scholar
Brier, R. (2009). The Roots of the “Fourth Republic” Solidarity’s Cultural Legacy to Polish Politics. East European Politics and Societies, 23 (1), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brilmayer, L (1989). Consent, Contract, and Territory. Minnesota Law Review, 74 (1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Brinks, D. (2005). Judicial Reform and Independence in Brazil and Argentina: The Beginning of a New Millennium? Texas International Law Journal, 40 (3), 595–622.Google Scholar
Brinks, D. (2008). The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, D. (2020). Social Rights Constitutionalism in Latin America. In Hubner, C., & Gargarella, R., eds., The Latin American Handbook of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 744–757.Google Scholar
Brookfield, F. M. (2006). Waitangi and Indigenous Rights: Revolution, Law and Legitimation, Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. (2017). A Theory of Legitimate Expectations for Public Administration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. (2014). The Integrity Branch: A “System”, An “Industry”, Or a Sensible Emerging Fourth Arm of Government? In Groves, M., eds., Modern Administrative Law in Australia: Concepts and Context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. M. (2012). Comparative Climate Change Policy and Federalism: An Overview. Review of Policy Research, 29 (3), 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. B. (2009). Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N. J. (2001). Constitutions in a Nonconstitutional World: Arab Basic Laws and the Prospects for Accountable Government, New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (2002). Suffering the Paradoxes of Rights. In Brown, W., & Halley, J., eds., Left Legalism/Left Critique, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 420–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, K. (2012). Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, K. (2020). Being Sure of Each Other: An Essay on Social Rights and Freedoms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, I. (2003). Principles of Public International Law, 6th edn, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brudnick, I. A., (2018). Congressional Salaries and Allowances: In Brief. Congressional Research Service Report RL30064. Washington: Library of Congress. Available from: www.senate.gov/CRSpubs/9c14ec69-c4e4-4bd8-8953-f73daa1640e4.pdf.Google Scholar
Brummer, C. (2015). Soft Law and the Global Financial System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, J. A. (2008). The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, J., & Toope, S. J. (2013). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryde, B.-O. (1982). Verfassungsentwicklung: Stabilität und Dynamik im Verfassungsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (1988). Ethics, Efficiency, and the Market. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2003). Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 2000. The Reason of Rules. 10 edition. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2013). The Heart of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1995–1996). Federalism and Individual Sovereignty. Cato Journal 15 (2–3), 259–268.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Vol. VII of The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1990). The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Bugaric, B., & Tushnet, M. (2021). Populism and Constitutionalism: An Essay on Definitions and Their Implications, Cardozo Law Review, 42 (6), 2345–2393.Google Scholar
Buiter, W. (2014). Central Banks: Powerful, Political and Unaccountable? Journal of the British Academy, 2, 269–303.Google Scholar
Bunn, P., Pugh, A. & Yeates, C. (2018). The Distributional Impact of Monetary Policy Easing in the UK between 2008 and 2014. Staff Working Papers. Bank of England, March 27.Google Scholar
Burbank, S. B., & Friedman, B. (2002). Reconsidering Judicial Independence. In Burbank, S. B., & Friedman, B., eds. Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 9–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdeau, G. (1969). Le statut du pouvoir dans l’État. Vol. IV of Traité de Science Politique. Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar
Burdon, P. (2011). The Great Jurisprudence. In Burdon, P., ed., Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence, Kent Town, SA: Wakefield Press, pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
Burgers, L. (2020). Should Judges Make Climate Law? Transnational Environmental Law, 9 (1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, G. (1993). The Politics of the Ancient Constitution: An Introduction to English Political Thought, 1603–1642, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, M. (2012). In Search of the Federal Spirit: New Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives in Comparative Federalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, M., & Gagnon, A-G., eds. (2010). Federal Democracies, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E. (1949 [1774]). Speech to the Electors of Bristol. In Hoffmann, R., & Levack, P., eds., Burke’s Politics, Selected Writings and Speeches. New York: AA Knopf, p. 115.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1993). Reflections on the Revolution in France. Edited by Mitchell, L. G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burley, A.-M., & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the Court. International Organization, 47 (1), 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buscaglia, E., & Dakolias, M. (1999). An Analysis of the Causes of Corruption in the Judiciary, Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. (1951). The Whig Interpretation of History, London: G. Bell and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Byrd, S. B., & Hruschka, J. (2010). Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, J. (2016). Mecca of Revolution: Algeria, Decolonization, and Third World Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabral, A. (1966). The Weapon of Theory. Available from: www.marxists.org/subject/africa/cabral/1966/weapon-theory.htm.Google Scholar
Cagé, J. (2020). The Price of Democracy: How money Shapes Politics and What to Do About It, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahier, P. (1998). L’ordre juridique interne des organisations internationals. In Dupuy, R.-J., ed., A Handbook on International Organizations, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 377–397.Google Scholar
Cairns, A. (2000). Citizens Plus. Aboriginal Peoples and the Canadian State, Vancouver/Toronto: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, S. (2001). The Virtues of Presidential Government: Why Professor Ackerman Is Wrong to Prefer the German to the US Constitution. Constitutional Commentary, 18 (1), 51–104.Google Scholar
Calabresi, S. and Lawson, G. (2007), “The unitary executive, jurisdiction stripping and the Hamdan opinions”, Columbia Law Review 107, 1002–1048.Google Scholar
Caldwell, P. (1997). Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005a). Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices. Organization Studies, 26 (8), 1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005b). Peripheral Vision: Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices. Organization studies, 26 (8), 1229–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calloway, C. G. (1995). The American Revolution in Indian Country: Crisis and Diversity in Native American Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calomiris, C. W., & Khan, U. (2015). An Assessment of TARP Assistance to Financial Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29 (2), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caluwaerts, D., & Reuchamps, M. (2018). The Legitimacy of Citizen-led Deliberative Democracy: The G1000 in Belgium, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, G. (1967). In White America: Liberal Conscience vs. Radical Consciousness. In Davidson, C., ed., Revolutionary Youth & the New Working Class: The Praxis Papers, the Port Authority Statement, the RYM Documents and Other Lost Writings of SDS. Pittsburgh: Changemaker Publications 2011. pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. (2018). Infinite Regress Arguments. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/infinite-regress/.Google Scholar
Caminker, E. H. (2003). Thayerian Deference to Congress and Supreme Court Supermajority Rule: Lessons from the Past. Indiana Law Journal, 78 (1), 73–122.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. (2022). Formula for Appointing Chancellor, CJ “makes no sense”; Constitutional Reform Could Fix Deadlock – Nandlall. Newsroom. April 6. Available from: https://newsroom.gy/2022/04/06/formula-for-appointing-chancellor-cj-makes-no-sense-constitutional-reform-could-fix-deadlock-nandlall/.Google Scholar
Canada. (1970a). Proclamation declaring that apprehended insurrection exists and has existed as and from the 15th October, 1970 (16 October 1970). SOR/70-443. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. (1970b). Public Order Regulations, P.C. 1970–1808, 16 October 1970, SOR/70-444. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Cane, P. (2003). Theories and Values in Public Law. In Craig, P., & Rawlings, R., eds., Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14–17.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2001). Cosmopolitan Justice and Equalizing Opportunities. Metaphilosophy, 32 (1–2), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S. (2014). Justice and the Basic Right to Justification. In Forst, R., ed., Justice, Democracy and Justification. Rainer Forst in Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, J. P. (1098). The Corporation in the Political Thought of the Italian Jurists of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries. History of Political Thought, 1 (1), 9–32.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (2001). Sleeping Dogs, Prowling Cats and Soaring Doves: Three Paradoxes in the Political Theory of Nationhood. Political Studies, 49 (2), 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, J. (1987). Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders. Review of Politics, 49 (2), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, J. (1992). Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective. In Barry, B., & Goodin, R. E., eds, Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Carens, J. (2000). Culture, Citizenship and Community. A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J. M. (2007). Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (1), 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S., eds. (1998). Executive Decree Authority, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, A. (2008). Iterative Federalism and Climate Change. Journal of Scholarly Perspectives, 4 (1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (1845). Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: With Elucidations, vol. I, New York: Wiley & Putnam.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. (1902). The Bastille. Vol. I of The French Revolution: A History, London: Chiswick Press.Google Scholar
Carney, G. (1989). An Overview of Manner and Form in Australia. Queensland University of Technology Law Journal, 5, 69–96.Google Scholar
Carolan, E. (2015). Ireland’s Constitutional Convention: Behind the Hype about Citizen-led Constitutional Change. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13 (3), 733–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolan, E. (2020). Constitutional Change Outside the Courts: Citizen Deliberation and Constitutional Narrative(s) in Ireland’s Abortion Referendum. Federal Law Review, 48 (4), 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, D., & Moss, D. A., eds. (2014). Preventing Regulatory Capture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carré de Malberg, R. (2004 [1920–1922]). Contribution à la théorie générale de l’État spécialement d’après les données fournies par le Droit constitutionnel français, Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Carreras, M. (2014). Outsiders and Executive-Legislative Conflict in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 56 (3), 70–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, M. (2017). Institutions, Governmental Performance and the Rise of Political Newcomers. European Journal of Political Research, 56 (2), 364–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, D. (1973). The Corsican Constitution of Pasquale Paoli (1755–1769). The English Historical Review, 88 (348), 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, I. (2011). Respect and the Basis of Equality. Ethics, 121 (3), 679–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casaleggio, G., & Grillo, B. (2011). Siamo in guerra. Per una nuova politica, Milan: Chiarelettere.Google Scholar
Cass, D. (2005). The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, S. (2010). Die Entfaltung des Verwaltungsstaates in Europa. In von Bogdandy, Cassese, , S., & Huber, P., eds., Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum, Bd. III, Verwaltungsrecht in Europa: Grundlagen. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, §41.Google Scholar
Cassese, S. (2015). Dentro la Corte. Diario di un giudice costituzionale, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Casson, D. (2008). Emergency Judgment: Carl Schmitt, John Locke, and the Paradox of Prerogative. Politics & Policy, 36 (6), 944–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castagnola, A. (2018). Manipulating Courts in New Democracies: Forcing Judges off the Bench in Argentina, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, W. T. (2009). Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecot, C., & Viscusi, W. K. (2015). Judicial Review of Agency Benefit-Cost Analysis. George Mason Law Review, 22 (3), 575–617.Google Scholar
Celikates, R. (2016). Democratizing Civil Disobedience. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 42 (10), 982–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency. (2020). The World Factbook: Military Service Age and Obligation. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20180716003832/ www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2024.html [Viewed 16 July 2018].Google Scholar
Cepeda, M. (2004). Judicial Activism in a Violent Context: The Origin, Role, and Impact of the Colombian Constitutional Court. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 3, 529–700.Google Scholar
Cepeda Espinosa, M. J., & Landau, D. (2017). Colombian Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cetra, D., Casanas-Adam, E., & Tarrega, M. (2018). The 2017 Catalan Independence Referendum: A Symposium. Scottish Affairs, 27 (1), 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CGFS. (2015). Central bank operating frameworks and collateral markets. Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures Papers No. 53. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N., & Power, T. (2018). Coalitional Presidentialism in Comparative Perspective: Minority Presidents in Multiparty Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. (2016). Humanities in the Anthropocene: The Crisis of an Enduring Kantian Fable. New Literary History, 47 (2–3), 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalifour, N. J. (2015). Environmental Justice and the Charter: Do Environmental Injustices Infringe Sections 7 and 15 of the Charter? Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 28 (1), 89–124.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. (2018a). Kickstarting the Bootstrapping: Jürgen Habermas, Deliberative Constitutionalization and the Limits of Proceduralism. In Levy, R., Kong, H., Orr, G., & King, J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, S. (2018b). Making Referendums Safe for Democracy: A Call for More and Better Deliberation. Swiss Political Science Review, 24 (3), 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, S. (2019a). Democracy and Constitutional Reform: Deliberative Versus Populist Constitutionalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45 (9–10), 1116–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, E. B. (2019b). The Distinctive Value of Elections and the Case for Compulsory Voting. American Political Science Review, 63 (1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheesman, N. (2014). Law and Order as Asymmetrical Opposite to the Rule of Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 6 (1), 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J. (2006). Presidentialism, Electoral Identifiability, and Budget Balances in Democratic Systems. American Political Science Review, 100 (3), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J. (2007). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, J. (2021). Intrinsic Backsliders? Presidentialism and Democratic Backsliding. Democracy and Autocracy (American Political Science Association, published by the Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies (WCED), University of Michigan), 19 (1), 4–8.Google Scholar
Cheibub, J., & Medina, A. (2019). The Politics of Presidential Term Limits in Latin America: From Re-democratization to Today. In Baturo, A., & Elgie, R., eds., The Politics of Presidential Term Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J. A., & Rasch, B. E. (2022). Constitutional Parliamentarism in Europe, 1800–2019. West European Politics, 45 (3), 470–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J., Elkins, Z., & Ginsburg, T. (2014). Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 44 (3), 515–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J., Przeworski, A., & Saiegh, S. (2004). Government Coalitions and Legislative Success under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34 (4), 565–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemerinsky, E. (2019). Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, 6th edn, New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cheneval, F., & el-Wakil, A. (2018). The Institutional Design of Referendums: Bottom-Up and Binding. Swiss Political Science Review, 24 (3), 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenwi, L. (2015). Democratizing the Socio-Economic Rights Enforcement Process. In Alviar García, H., Klare, K., & Williams, L., eds., Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 178–197.Google Scholar
Chhibber, P., & Kollman, K. (2004). The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India and the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Choudhry, S., & Howse, R. (2000). Constitutional Theory and the Quebec Secession Reference. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 13 (2), 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhry, S., & Hume, N. (2011). Federalism, Secession & Devolution: From Classical to Post-Conflict Federalism. In Ginsburg, T., & Dixon, R., eds., Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 356–383.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (1996). The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2008). The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. (2011). An Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to Democracy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39 (2), 142–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. (2012). Rational Deliberation among Experts and Citizens. In Mansbridge, J., & Parkinson, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T. (2020). The Arbitrary Circumscription of the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 23 (3), 352–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, T., & Braynen, W. (2008). Inequality, Injustice and Leveling Down. Ratio, 21 (4), 392–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, M. T. (2017 [52 BC]). On The Commonwealth and On The Laws. Translated by J. E. Zetzel. 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ciepley, D. (2006). Liberalism in the Shadow of Totalitarianism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ciepley, D. (2017). Is the U.S. Government a Corporation? The Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism. American Political Science Review, 111 (2), 418–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çıdam, C. (2017). Radical Democracy Without Risks? Habermas on Constitutional Patriotism and Civil Disobedience. New German Critique, 44 (2), 105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (2012). After 1848: The European Revolution in Government. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 22, 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. S. (2011). The Limits of Judicial Independence, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. V. (1964). Medieval Representation and Consent: A Study of Early Parliaments in England and Ireland, with Special Reference to the Modus Tenendi Parliamentum, New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Clifford, R. (2019). Saanich Law and the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion. Centre for International Governance Innovation. Available from: www.cigionline.org/articles/saanich-law-and-trans-mountain-pipeline-expansion.Google Scholar
Clemens, M. (2011). Economics and Emigration: Trillion-Dollar Bills on the Sidewalk? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25 (3), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbe, J. (2019). Administrative Law and the Machines of Government: Judicial Review of Automated Public-Sector Decision-Making. Legal Studies, 39 (4), 636–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, C., & Lazer, D. (2003). Management‐based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals. Law & Society Review, 37 (4), 691–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, C. (1971). Civil Disobedience: Conscience, Tactics, and the Law, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, E. F. (2015). The Political Economy of Immigrant Time: Rights, Citizenship and Temporariness in the Post-1965 Era. Polity, 47 (3), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E. F. (2018). The Political Value of Time: Citizenship, Duration and Democratic Justice, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E. F., & Ghosh, C. (2019). Citizenship (Key Concepts in Political Theory). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing Justice and Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2011a). Equality of What? On Welfare, Goods and Capabilities. In Cohen, G. A., ed., On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Edited by M. Otsuka. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2011b). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1996). Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In Benhabib, S. ed., Democracy and Difference: Changing Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 407–437.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Bohman, J., & Rehg, W., eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (2006). Is There a Human Right to Democracy? In Sypnowich, C., ed., The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–250.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 154–180.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2012). Globalization and Sovereignty. Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., & Sabel, C. (1997). Directly Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3 (4), 313–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kueng, L., & Silvia, J. (2017). Innocent Bystanders? Monetary Policy and Inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 88, 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coicaud, J.-M., & Heiskanen, V., eds. (2001). The Legitimacy of International Organizations. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, D. (2003). Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism, New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Cole, D. (2004). The Priority of Morality: The Emergency Constitution’s Blind Spot. Yale Law Journal, 113, 1753–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. (1999). Colonialism & Revolution in the Middle East: Social and Cultural Origins of Egypt’s ‘Urabi Movement, Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
Cole, P. (2000). Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, R., Kincaid, J., & Rodriguez, A. (2004). Public Opinion on Federalism and Federal Political Culture in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Publius, 34 (3), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, L. (2021). The Gun, the Ship, and the Pen: Warfare, Constitutions, and the Making of the Modern World, London: Profile.Google Scholar
Collin, P. (2017). The Legitimation of Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in Corporatist Concepts of Legal Scholars in the Weimar Republic. Politics and Governance, 5 (1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collings, J. (2015). Democracy’s Guardian: A History of the German Federal Constitutional Court 1951–2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. (2014). On the (In)compatibility of Human Rights Discourse and Private Law. In Micklitz, H., ed., Constitutionalization of European Private Law, Oxford University Press, pp. 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking Expertise, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., & Sossin, L. (2019). In Search of an Ecological Approach to Constitutional Principles and Environmental Discretion in Canada. University of British Columbia Law Review, 52 (1), 293–343.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (2008). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 1st edn, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colomer, J. (2013). Elected Kings with the Name of Presidents. On the Origins of Presidentialism in the United States and Latin America. Revista Lationamericana de Politica Comparada, 7 (1), 79–97.Google Scholar
Colomer, J., & Negretto, G. (2005). Can Presidentialism Work Like Parliamentarism? Government and Opposition, 40 (1), 60–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colón-Ríos, J. (2011). The Three Waves of the Constitutionalism-Democracy Debate in The United States: And an Invitation to Return to the First. Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Papers VUWLRP.Google Scholar
Colón-Ríos, J. (2020). Constituent Power and the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comella, V. F. (2013). The Constitution of Spain: A Contextual Analysis, Oxford: Hart Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. (2011). Deep Water. The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future of Offshore Drilling. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office.Google Scholar
Constitute Project. (2020). Constitute The World’s Constitutions to Read, Search, and Compare. Available from Constituteproject.org website: www.constituteproject.org/ (Accessed: 9 September 2020).Google Scholar
Constitutional Reform Committee. (1992[1848]). Report on the 1848 Draft Constitution of Switzerland. In Lijphart, A., ed., Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–174.Google Scholar
Cook, B. J. (2014). Bureaucracy and Self-government: Reconsidering the Role of Public Administration in American Politics, Baltimore: JHU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, B. J. (2021). The Fourth Branch: Reconstructing the Administrative State for the Commercial Republic, Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooray, L. J. M. (1979). Conventions. The Australian Constitution and the Future, Sydney: Legal Books.Google Scholar
Cornell, D. (2014). Law and Revolution in South Africa: uBuntu, Dignity, and the Struggle for Constitutional Transformation, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, N. (2015). Wrongs, Rights, and Third Parties. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 43 (2), 109–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrias, L. (2016). Populism in a Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity. European Constitutional Law Review, 12 (6), 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T. (2000). Limits to International Trade: The Constitutional Challenge. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 94, 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T. (2013). Poverty, Redistribution, and International Trade Regulation. In Schefer, K., ed., Poverty and the International Economic Legal System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G. (2006). The Organization of Democratic Legislatures. In Weingast, B., & Wittman, D., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–161.Google Scholar
Cox, A. B., & Rodridguez, C. (2020). The President and Immigration Law, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. (1997). Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law. Public Law, 467–487.Google Scholar
Craig, P. (2014). Economic Governance and the Euro Crisis: Constitutional Architecture and Constitutional Implications. In Adams, M., Fabbrini, F., & Larouche, P., eds, The Constitutionalization of European Budgetary Constraints. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
Craig, P. (2005 [2017]). Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework. In Bellamy, R., ed., The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers. London: Routledge, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
Craig, P., & de Búrca, (2015). EU Law. Text, Cases, and Materials, 6th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P., & Rawlings, R., eds. (2003). Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, R., Ekins, R., & Laws, S. (2019). Lost in Transition: The Conservative Leadership Contest and the Confidence of the Commons, London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
Craiutu, A. (2012). A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought. 1748–1830, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Craiutu, A. (2017). Faces of Moderation: The Art of Balance in an Age of Extremes, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, C. C. (1915). The Suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act and the Revolution of 1689. The English Historical Review, 30 (120), 613–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. (2003). International Law and the Rule of Law. Adelaide Law Review, 24 (1), 3–12.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1988). Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Anti-discrimination Law. Harvard Law Review, 107 (7), 1331–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1994). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. In Jaggar, A., ed., Living With Contradictions: Controversies in Feminist Social Ethics. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Cretney, S. (1998). Law, Law Reform and the Family, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criddle, E. (2006). Fiduciary Foundations of Administrative Law. UCLA Law Review, 54 (1), 117–183.Google Scholar
Criddle, E., Fox-Decent, E., Gold, A., Hui Kim, S., & Miller, P., eds. (2018a). Fiduciary Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criddle, E., Fox-Decent, E., Gold, A., Hui Kim, S., & Miller, P. (2018b). Fiduciary Government: Provenance, Promise, and Pitfalls. In Criddle, et al., eds., Fiduciary Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criddle, E., Miller, P., Sitkoff, R., eds. (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croce, M., & Goldoni, M. (2020). The Legacy of Pluralism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Croce, M., & Salvatore, A. (2013). The Legal Theory of Carl Schmitt, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, N., & Nethercut, D. (2005). Citizen Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People. In Gastil, J., & Levine, P., eds., The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 111–119.Google Scholar
Cruft, R. (2019). Human Rights, Ownership, and the Individual, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, P. J. (2006). The “Anthropocene”. In Ehlers, E., & Krafft, T., eds., Earth System Science in the Anthropocene. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 13–18.Google Scholar
Cullen, M. (2020). Separation of Powers in the United Nations System? Institutional Structure and the Rule of Law. International Organizations Law Review, 17 (3), 492–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullinan, C. (2011). Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice, 2nd edn, Devon, UK: Green Books.Google Scholar
Culver, K., & Giudice, M. (2010). Legality’s Borders, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custos, D. (2017). The 2015 French Code of Administrative Procedure; an Assessment. In Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P., & Emerson, B., eds., Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 284–301.Google Scholar
Daalder, H. (1984). In Search of the Center of European Party Systems. American Political Science Review, 78 (1), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1957). Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker. Journal of Public Law, 6 (2), 279–295.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (2006). A Preface to Democratic Theory, 3rd edn, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, E. (2015). A Republican Defence of the Constitutional Referendum, Legal Studies, 35 (1), 30–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, P. (2016). Administrative Law: A Values-Based Approach. In Bell, J., Elliott, M., Murray, P., & Varuhas, J., eds., Public Law Adjudication in the Common Law World: Process and Substance. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
Damiani, M. (2020). Populist Radical Left Parties in Western Europe: Equality and Sovereignty, London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, J., Cain, D., & Dawes, R. (2006). What You Don’t Know Can’t Hurt Me. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Angelo, J., & Ranalli, B. (2019). The Dark of Sunlight. Foreign Affairs, 98 (3), pp. 155–168.Google Scholar
Darag, A. (2016). Politics or piety? Why the Muslim Brotherhood engages in social service provision. Brookings Rethinking Islam Series. Available from: www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Amr-Darrag-FINAL-3-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Darnton, R. (1989). What Was Revolutionary about the French Revolution? New York Review of Books. 19 January 1989.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (2006). The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect and Accountability, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (2012). Bipolar Obligation. In Shafer-Landau, R., ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. VII. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 333–358.Google Scholar
Daugirdas, K. (2016). How and Why International Law Binds International Organizations. Harvard Journal of International Law, 57 (2), 325–381.Google Scholar
Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, K. E., & Trebilcock, M. J. (2008). The Relationship between Law and Development: Optimists Versus Skeptics. American Journal of Comparative Law, 56 (4), 895–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawood, Y. (2006). Democracy, Power, and the Supreme Court: Campaign Finance Reform in Comparative Context. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4 (2), 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawood, Y. (2012). Electoral Fairness and the Law of Democracy: A Structural Rights Approach to Judicial Review. University of Toronto Law Journal, 62 (4), 499–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, N., & van ’t Klooster, J. (2020). The ECB, the Courts and the Issue of Democratic Legitimacy after Weiss. Common Market Law Review, 57 (6), 1689–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, N., & van ’t Klooster, J. (2021). The ECB’s Neglected Secondary Mandate: An Inter-institutional Solution, Brussels: Positive Money Europe.Google Scholar
de Búrca, G., & Scott, J. (2001). The EU and WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
De Cleen, B., Moffitt, B., Panayotu, P., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2020). The Potentials and Difficulties of Transnational Populism: The Case of the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25). Political Studies, 68 (1), 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehousse, R. (1998). The European Court of Justice: The Politics of Judicial Integration, New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jouvenel, B. (1966). The Means of Contestation. Government and Opposition, 1 (2), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, P. (2008). Legislating for Equality in Colombia: Constitutional Jurisprudence, Tutelas, and Social Reform. The Equal Rights Review, 1, 50–59.Google Scholar
de la Calle, H. (2004). Contra todas las Apuestas: Historia Íntima de la Constituyente de 1991, Bogotá: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
de la Torre, C., & Burbano de Lara, F. (2020). Populism, Constitution Making, and the Rule of Law in Latin America. Partecipazione e conflitto, 13 (3), 1453–1468.Google Scholar
D’Elia-Kueper, J., & Segal, J. (2017). Ideology and Partisanship. In Epstein, L., & Lindquist, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–319.Google Scholar
Della Mirandola, G. P. (1996). Oration on the Dignity of Man. Translated by A. Robert Caponigri. Washington, DC: Gateway Editions.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D., Peterson, A., & Reiter, H., eds., (2006). The Policing of Transnational Protest, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Delmas, C. (2018). A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, C. (2019). Civil Disobedience, Punishment, and Injustice. In Ferzan, K., & Alexander, L., eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, C. (2020). Uncivil Disobedience in Hong Kong. Boston Review. 13 January. Available from: http://bostonreview.net/global-justice/candice-delmas-uncivil-disobedience-hong-kong.Google Scholar
de Maistre, J. (1884). Etude sur la Souveraineté. In Archives de la Révolution Française.Google Scholar
De Maistre, J. (1994). Considerations on France. Translated and edited by R. Lebrun. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMott, D. (2019). Fiduciary Principles in Agency Law. In Criddle, E., Miller, P., & Sitkoff, R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Denninger, E. (1990). Verfassungsrechtliche Anforderungen an die Normsetzung im Umwelt- und Technikrecht, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Department of Justice, Government of the United States. (2020). Country Policy and Information Note. Iran: Miltary Service. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20201128232832/ www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1274581/download. [Viewed 28 November 2020].Google Scholar
Derthick, M. (2010). Compensatory Federalism. In Rabe, B., ed., Greenhouse Governance: Addressing Climate Change in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 58–72.Google Scholar
Desan, C. (2014). Making Money: Coin, Currency, and the Coming of Capitalism, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschouwer, K. (1994). The Decline of Consociationalism and the Reluctant Modernization of Belgian Mass Parties. In Katz, R. S., & Mair, P., eds., How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage, pp. 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2011). Federalism as fairness, The Journal of Political Philosophy 19(2), 167–189.Google Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2014), Testing for Linguistic Injustice: territoriality and pluralism. Nationalities Papers. 42:6, 1034–1052. De Schutter, H. (2017) Two principles of equal language recognition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20:1, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2016). The Liberal Linguistic Turn: Kymlicka’s Freedom Account Revisited. Dve Domovini – Two Homelands (44), 51–65.Google Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2022). Linguistic Justice for Immigrants. Nations and Nationalism, 28 (2), 418–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2023). Taming Dignity for Multiculturalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26 (1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. (1856). The Old Regime and the Revolution. John Bonner, trans. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Developments in the Law. (2010). State Action and the Public/Private Distinction, Harvard Law Review, 123 (5), 1248–1314.Google Scholar
De Wet, E. (2006). The International Constitutional Order. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 55 (1), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1918). Philosophy and Democracy. In John Dewey, The Middle Works, 1899–1924 vol. XI. Edited by J. A. Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
De Wilde, M. (2010). Locke and the State of Exception: Towards a Modern Understanding of Emergency Government. European Constitutional Law Review, 6 (2), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, M. (2012). The Dictator’s Trust: Regulating and Constraining Emergency Powers in the Roman Republic. History of Political Thought, 33 (4), 555–577.Google Scholar
Díaz de Valdés, J. M., & Verdugo, S. (2019). The ALBA Constitutional Project and Political Representation. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (2), 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicey, A. V. (1915). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th edn, London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. (1982 [1915]) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th edn, Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. (2007). Lectures on the Relationship between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. (2013). The Law of the Constitution. Edited by Allison, J. W. F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dicke, K. (2002). The Founding Function of Human Dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In Kretzmer, D., & Klein, E., eds., The Concept of Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 111–120.Google Scholar
Dienel, P. C. (1999). Planning Cells: The German Experience. In Khan, U., ed., Participation Beyond the Ballot Box. London: UCL Press, pp. 81–93.Google Scholar
Dienstag, J. F. (1996). Between History and Nature: Social Contract Theory in Locke and the Founders. Journal of Politics, 58 (4), 985–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietsch, P., Claveau, F., & Fontan, C. (2018). Do Central Banks Serve the People? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Dikau, S., & Volz, U. (2021). Central Bank Mandates, Sustainability Objectives and the Promotion of Green Finance. Ecological Economics, 184, 107022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinan, J. (2006). The American State Constitutional Tradition, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Disch, L. (2015). The Constructivist Turn in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead-End? Constellations, 22 (4), 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, M., & McCorquodale, R. (2003). Cases and Materials on International Law, 4th edn, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. (2012). The Politics of Conflict: A Constructivist Critique of Consociational and Civil Society Theories. Nations and Nationalism 18 (1), 98–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. (2018). Constitutional Rights as Bribes. Connecticut Law Review, 50 (3), 767–818.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. (2023). Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R., & Landau, D. (2018). Tiered Constitutional Design. The George Washington Law Review, 86 (2), 438–512.Google Scholar
Dixon, R., & Landau, D. (2020). Constitutional End Games: Making Presidential Term Limits Stick. Hastings Law Journal, 71 (2), 359–418.Google Scholar
Dixon, R., & Tushnet, M. (2021). Constitutional Democracy and Electoral Commissions: A Reflection from Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, Online First.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobner, P. (2012). More Law, Less Democracy? Democracy and Transnational Constitutionalism. In Dobner, P., & Loughlin, M., eds., The Twilight of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the Environment, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. (2016). Environmental Politics: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, V., Gayle, D., & Murray, J. (2019). Police Seek Tougher Powers against Extinction Rebellion. The Guardian. 19 October. Available from: www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/19/police-seek-tougher-powers-against-extinction-rebellion (Accessed: 1 November 2019).Google Scholar
Donald, A. (2016). Immigration Points-based Systems Compared. BBC. 1 June. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20180819133654/ www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-29594642 [Viewed 19 August 2018].Google Scholar
Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, C. (2007). Delegation of Governmental Power to Private Parties: A Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, L. (2008). The Cost of Counterterrorism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorf, M. (2008). The Morality of Prophylactic Legislation. Current Legal Problems, 61 (1), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, V. M. (1994). Absurdity and the Limits of Literalism: Defining the Absurd Result Principle in Statutory Interpretation. American University Law Review, 44 (1), 127–166.Google Scholar
Dowdle, M. (2006). Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Downey, L. (2021). Delegation in Democracy: A Temporal Analysis. Journal of Political Philosophy, 29 (3), pp. 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, L. (2022). Governing Money Democratically: Rechartering the Federal Reserve. In Allen, D., et al., ed., Governing Money Democratically: Rechartering the Federal Reserve. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 340–366.Google Scholar
Doyle, O. (2021). Order from Chaos: Typologies and Models of Constitutional Change. In Contiades, X., & Fotiadou, A., eds., Routledge Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Change. London: Routledge, pp. 45–60.Google Scholar
Doyle, O., & Walsh, R. (2020). Deliberation in Constitutional Amendment: Reappraising Ireland’s Deliberative Mini-Publics. European Constitutional Law Review, 16 (3), 440–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (2009). Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building. Comparative Political Studies, 42 (11), 1379–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchacek, I. (1970). Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Duchacek, I. (1986). Territorial Dimension of Politics: Within, among, and across Nations, Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Dukes, R. (2014). The Labour Constitution: The Enduring Idea of Labour Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. (1997). Principles of Electoral Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, G. (2015). New Zealand. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (1969). The Political Thought of John Locke, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (1999). Situating Democratic Political Accountability. In Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., & Manin, B., eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (2008). Understanding Revolution. In Foran, J., Lane, D., & Zivkovic, A., eds., Revolution in the Making of the Modern World: Social Identities, Globalization and Modernity. London: Routledge, pp. 17–26.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. (2006). Constitutional Conceits: The WTO’s “Constitution” and the Discipline of International Law. European Journal of International Law, 17 (3), 647–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, J. (2009). The Politics of International Constitutions: The Curious Case of the World Trade Organization. In Dunoff, J., & Trachtman, J., eds., Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, J., & Trachtmann, J. (2009a). A Functional Approach to International Constitutionalization. In Dunoff, J., & Trachtman, J., eds., Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, J., & Trachtman, J., eds. (2009b). Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, J., Ratner, S., & Wippman, D. (2015). International Law: Norms, Actors, Process: A Problem-Oriented Approach, New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1997 [1893]). The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by W. D. Hall. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Duverger, M. (1980). A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research, 8 (2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, G. (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1978 [1977]) Taking Rights Seriously, 5th edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., (1981). The Forum of Principle. New York University Law Review, 56 (2–3), 469–511.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1994). Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom, New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1995). Constitutionalism and Democracy. European Journal of Philosophy, 3 (1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1996a). Does Britain Need a Bill of Rights? In Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 352–372.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1996b). Introduction: The Moral Reading and the Majoritarian Premise. In Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1996c). Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1998). Affirming Affirmative Action. The New York Review of Books. 22 October.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dyevre, A. (2015). Technocracy and Distrust: Revisiting the Rationale for Constitutional Review. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13 (1), 30–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, K. (2009). The State Tradition in Western Europe. A Study of an Idea and Institution, 2nd edn, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (1997). Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen, and Hermann Heller in Weimar, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (1998a). Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves: Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (1998b). Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik’s Conception of Legal Culture. South African Journal on Human Rights, 14 (1), 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2005). The State of Emergency in Legal Theory. In Ramraj, V. V., Hor, M., & Roach, K., eds., Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2006a). The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2006b). Schmitt V. Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order? Cardozo Law Review, 27 (5), 2005–2040.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2007a). Deference, Security and Human Rights. In Goold, B., & Lazarus, L., eds., Security and Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 125–156.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2007b). The Politics of the Question of Constituent Power. In Loughlin, M., & Walker, N., eds., The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–145.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2008). The Compulsion of Legality. In Ramraj, V. V. ed., Emergencies and the Limits of Legality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2009a). Review Article: How Hobbes Met the “Hobbes Challenge”. Modern Law Review, 72 (3), pp. 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2009b). The Puzzle of Martial Law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 59 (1), 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2010). Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2012a). Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power. Global Constitutionalism, 1 (2), 229–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2012b). States of Emergency. In Rosenfeld, M., & Sájo, A., eds., Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 442–460.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2014). Proportionality and Deference in a Culture of Justification. In Huscroft, G., Miller, B., & Webber, G., eds., Proportionality and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 234–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2016). The Idea of a Constitution: A Plea for Staatsrechtslehre. In Dyzenhaus, D., & Thorburn, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2019). Introduction: The Politics of Sovereignty. In Heller, H., ed., Sovereignty: A Contribution to the Theory of Public and International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2020). The Janus-Faced Constitution. In Bomhoff, J., Dyzenhaus, D., & Poole, T., eds., The Double-Facing Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., & Thorburn, M., eds. (2016). Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzur, A. W. (2012). Punishment, Participatory Democracy, and the Jury. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzur, A. W. (2013). Twelve Absent Men: Rebuilding the American Jury. The Boston Review, 38 (4), 30–35.Google Scholar
Eatwell, R., & Goodwin, M. (2018). National Populism: The Revolt against Liberal Democracy, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Eberle, C., & Cuneo, T., (2015). Religion and Political Theory. In Zalta, E., ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition). Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/religion-politics/Google Scholar
Eberlein, B., Abbott, K. W., Black, J., Meidinger, E., & Wood, S. (2014). Transnational Business Governance Interactions: Conceptualization and Framework for Analysis. Regulation & Governance, 8 (1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahim, H. (1999). The Soul of a Nation: Constitution-making in South Africa, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ECB. (2021). The ECB’s Monetary Policy Strategy Statement. 8 July. Available from: www.ecb.europa.eu/home/search/review/html/ecb.strategyreview_monpol_strategy_statement.en.html (last Accessed: 18 July 2021).Google Scholar
Eckersley, R. (2004). The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, D. (2022). Rousseau, Bodin, and the Medieval Corporatist Origins of Popular Sovereignty. Political Theory, 50 (1), 142–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edge, P., Corrin, J., & Than, C. (2019). The Appointment and Removal of the Head of Government of the Kiribati Republic. A Report for Daphne Caine MHK, October 2019. Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
Edward, D. (2003). National Court – the Powerhouse of Community Law. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 5 (1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, P. (2013). Human Rights and the Autonomy of EU Law: Pluralism or Integration? Current Legal Problems, 66 (1), 169–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eekelaar, J. M. (1973). Principles of Revolutionary Legality. In Simpson, A. W. B., ed., Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 22–43.Google Scholar
Ehmke, H. (1962). “Staat” und “Gesellschaft” als verfassungstheoretisches Problem. In Hesse, K., Reicke, S., & Scheuner, U., eds., Staatsverfassung und Kirchenordnung. Festgabe für Rudolf Smend zum 80. Geburtstag, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 23–49.Google Scholar
Eifert, M. (2014). Conceptualizing Administrative Law – Legal Protection Versus Regulatory Approach. In Punder, H., & Waldhoff, C., eds., Debates in German Public Law. Oxford: Hart, pp. 203–218.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, C. (2001). Constitutional Self-Government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisgruber, C., & Sager, L. (2007). Religious Freedom and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R. (2011). Legislative Intent in Law’s Empire. Ratio Juris, 24 (4), 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R. (2012). The Nature of Legislative Intent, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R. (2013). How to Be a Free People. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 58 (2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R. (2014). Legislating Proportionately. In Huscroft, G., Miller, B., & Webber, G., eds., Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 343–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R. (2017a). Legislative Freedom in the United Kingdom. Law Quarterly Review, 132, 582–605.Google Scholar
Ekins, R. (2017b). Objects of Interpretation. Constitutional Commentary, 32 (1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Ekins, R. (2019a). Intentions and Reflections: The Nature of Legislative Intent Revisited. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 64 (1), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R. (2019b). Constitutional Conversations in Britain (in Europe). In Sigalet, G., Webber, G., & Dixon, R., eds., Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 436–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R. (2019c). Models of (and Myths About) Rights Protection. In Crawford, L., Emerton, P., & Smith, D., eds., Law Under a Democratic Constitution: Essays in Honour of Jeffrey Goldsworthy. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 224–247.Google Scholar
Ekins, R. (2020). The Dynamics and Objects of Democratic Agency. Comment on Tuck 2019. Available from: www.kcl.ac.uk/c-ppl/assets/inaugural-lecture-series/r-ekins-revised-comment-on-richard-tuck-ytl-annual-lecture.pdf.Google Scholar
Ekins, R., & Laws, S. (2019a). Securing Electoral Accountability, London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
Ekins, R., & Laws, S. (2019b). Endangering Constitutional Government: The Risks of the House of Commons Taking Control, London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
Ekins, R., & Webber, G. (2018). Legislated Rights in the Anglo-American Tradition. Faulkner Law Review, 10 (1), 129–169.Google Scholar
Elazar, D., ed. (1994). Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal and Autonomy Arrangements, 2nd edn, Harlow: Longmans.Google Scholar
Elderkin, R. (2015). The Impact of International Criminal Law and the ICC on National Constitutional Arrangements. Global Constitutionalism, 4 (2), 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Electoral Commission. Register to vote. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20210102043337/https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/voter/register-vote-and-update-your-details [Viewed 1 January 2021].Google Scholar
Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types and Democratic Performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgie, R. (2016). Varieties of Presidentialism & of Leadership Outcomes, Daedalus, 145 (3), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkink, J. A., Farrell, D. M., Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2016). Understanding the 2015 Marriage Referendum in Ireland: Context, Campaign, and Conservative Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 32 (3), 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkink, J. A., Farrell, D. M., Marien, S. Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2019). The Death of Conservative Ireland? The 2018 Abortion Referendum. UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy Discussion Paper Series. Available at www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/workingpapers/gearywp201911.pdf.Google Scholar
Elkins, Z, Ginsburg, T, & Melton, J. (2009). The Endurance of National Constitutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkjaer, A. M., & Iverson, T. (2020). The Political Representation of Economic Interests: Subversion of Democracy or Middle-Class Supremacy? World Politics, 72 (2), 254–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, B. (2019). Independent Regulatory and Oversight (Fourth Branch) Institutions. IDEA. Available from: www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/independent-regulatory-and-oversight-fourth-branch-institutions (Accessed: 4 January 2022).Google Scholar
Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2014). Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M., Varuhas, J., & Stark, S., eds. (2018). The Unity of Public Law? Doctrinal, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1984). Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality, rev. edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2006). Legislatures as Constituent Assemblies. In Bauman, R. W., & Kahana, T., eds., The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (2007). Unwritten Constitutional Norms. Working Paper. Columbia University.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2013). Securities Against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (2016). Icelandic Constitution-Making in Comparative Perspective. In Ingimundarson, V., Urfalino, P., & Erlingsdóttirr, I., eds., Iceland’s Financial Crisis. London: Routledge, pp. 187–202.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2017). Constitutions and Constitution-Making. 10 September 2017. Available from: www.hr.fudan.edu.cn/_upload/article/64/c3/6a6475fd465ba83bf340746409e9/32b0f60b-8a82-48af-9e16-1a6f80fd6111.pdf (Accessed: 28 February 2020).Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2018). The Political Psychology of Constitution Making. In Elster, J., Gargarella, R., Naresh, V., & Rasch, B. E., eds., Constitutent Assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J., & Slagstad, R., eds. (1988). Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elstub, S., & Escobar, O., eds., (2019). Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elstub, S., & McLaverty, P. (2014). Introduction. In Elstub, S., & McLaverty, P., eds., Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elstub, S., & Pomatto, G. (2018). Minipublics and Deliberative Constitutionalism. In Levy, R. et al. eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, J. H. (1980). Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, B. (2017a). Affirmatively Furthering Equal Protection: Constitutional Meaning in the Administration of Fair Housing. Buffalo Law Review, 65 (1), 163–235.Google Scholar
Emerson, B. (2017b). The Administration of Constitutional Conflict: Structural Transformations in American Public Law, 1877–1946. Quaderni Fiorentini, 46, 385–415.Google Scholar
Emerson, B. (2019). The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, B. (2021). The Departmental Structure of Executive Power: Subordinate Checks from Madison to Mueller. Yale Journal on Regulation, 38 (1), 90–174.Google Scholar
Emerson, T. I. (1963). Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment. Yale Law Journal, 72 (5), 877–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmert, F. (2008). Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe. Fordham International Law Journal, 32 (2), 551–586.Google Scholar
Endicott, T. (2012). Legal Interpretation. In Marmor, A., ed., The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. New York: Routledge, pp. 109–122.Google Scholar
Endicott, T. (2014). Proportionality and Incommensurability. In Huscroft, G., Miller, B., & Webber, G., eds., Proportionality and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, T. (2016). Equity and Administrative Behaviour: A Commentary. In Turner, P., ed., Equity and Administration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, R., & Swartz, K. (2014). Race, Crime, and Policing. In Bucerius, S., & Tonry, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–165.Google Scholar
Engst, B. et al. (2017). Zum Einfluss der Parteinähe auf das Abstimmungsverhalten der Bundesverfassungsrichter – eine quantitative Untersuchung. JuristenZeitung, 72 (11), 816–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epperly, B. (2019). The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in Dictatorship and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, B. (2015). The Ant-Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, G. A., & Yeldan, A. E. (2009). Beyond Inflation Targeting: Assessing the Impacts and Policy Alternatives, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. (2014). The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1970). “They Have the Power, We Have the People”: The Status of Equal Employment Opportunity in Houston, Texas, 1970. Washington, DC: EEOC.Google Scholar
Erdos, D. (2010). Delegating Rights Protection: The Rise of Bills of Rights in the Westminster World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R. (2015). Income Inequality and Policy Responsiveness. Annual Review of Political Science, 18 (1), 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erk, J. (2008). Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erk, J., & Anderson, L. M. (2010). The Paradox of Federalism: Does Self-Rule Accommodate or Exacerbate Ethnic Divisions? London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ertman, T. (1997). Birth of the Leviathan. Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, D. R. (2014). Tocqueville’s Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America, 1914–1940, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, W. (2010). The California Proposition 8 Case: What Is a Constitution For? California Law Review 98 (4), 1235–1252.Google Scholar
Eskridge, W., Jr. & Ferejohn, J. A. (2010). A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esterling, K. M., Fung, A., & Lee, T. (2021). When Deliberation Produces Persuasion Rather than Polarization: Measuring and Modeling Small Group Dynamics in a Field Experiment. British Journal of Political Science, 51 (2), 666–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, D. (1997). Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority. In Bohman, J., & Rehg, W., eds., Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eule, J. N. (1987). Temporal Limits on the Legislative Mandate: Entrenchment and Retroactivity. Law and Social Enquiry, 12 (2–3), 381–459.Google Scholar
Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the State back in, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, K. D, Rowbottom, J., & Tham, Joo-Cheong (2012). The Funding of Political Parties: Where Now? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2001). Features and Implications of Semi-Parliamentarism: The Direct Election of Italian Mayors. South European Society and Politics, 6 (2), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, C. (2000). Social Rights under the Constitution. Government and the Decent Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, C. (2005). Social Rights in European Constitutions. In de Búrca, G., & de Witte, B., eds., Social Rights in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Failer, J. L. (2002). Who Qualifies for Rights?: Homelessness, Mental Illness, and Civil Commitment, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, A. (1987). To Redeem the Soul of America: The Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Martin Luther King, Jr., Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
FallonJr, R. H. (1997). “The Rule of Law” as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse. Columbia Law Review, 97 (1), 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, Jr., R. (2019). The Nature of Constitutional Rights: The Invention and Logic of Strict Judicial Scrutiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanon, F. (2018). Alienation and Freedom. Edited by Khalfa, J. & Young, Robert J. C.. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Farrand, M., ed. (1937). The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, D., Suiter, J., & Harris, C. (2019). “Systematizing” Constitutional Deliberation: The 2016–2018 Citizens’ Assembly in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 34 (1), 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassbender, B. (1998). The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 (3), 529–619.Google Scholar
Fassbender, B. (2009). Rediscovering the Forgotten Constitution: Notes on the Place of the UN Charter in the International Legal Order. In Dunoff, J., & Trachtman, J., eds., Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatin-Rouge Stefanini, M. (2017). Referendums, Minorities and Individual Freedoms. In Morel, L., & Qvortrup, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Referendums and Direct Democracy. London: Routledge, pp. 371–387.Google Scholar
Fatovic, C. (2004). Constitutionalism and Presidential Prerogative: Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian Perspectives. American Journal of Political Science, 48 (3), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatovic, C. (2009). Outside the Law: Emergency and Executive Power, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatovic, C., & Kleinerman, B. A., eds. (2013). Extra-Legal Power and Legitimacy: Perspectives on Prerogative, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Hay, C., & Wood, M. (2017). Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance. In Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. (2012). The Political Theory of Federalism. Flinders Journal of History and Politics, 28, 1–15.Google Scholar
Feeley, M., & Rubin, E. (2008). Federalism: Political Identity and Tragic Compromise, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). The Economics of Strong Reciprocity. In Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E., eds., Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 151–192.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1970). The Nature and Value of Rights. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 4 (4), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1986). Harm to Self. Volume III of The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1988). Harmless Wrongdoing. Volume IV of The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. (2008). Judging Necessity: Democracy and Extralegalism. Political Theory, 36 (4), 550–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, N. (2021). The Broken Constitution: Lincoln, Slavery, and the Refounding of America, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Fenton, W. N. (1998). The Great Law of the Longhouse: A Political History of the Iroquois Confederacy, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (1999). Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence. Southern California Law Review, 72 (2–3), 353–384.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (2002). Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 65 (3), 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (2008). The Citizen’s Assembly Model. In Warren, M., & Pearse, H. eds., Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J., & Pasquino, P. (2002). Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions. Towards an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice. In Wojciech, S., ed., Constitutional Justice, East and West. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 21–36.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J., & Pasquino, P. (2004). The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2 (2), 210–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J., & Sager, L. (2002). Commitment and Constitutionalism. Texas Law Review, 81 (7), 1929–1964.Google Scholar
Ferrajoli, L. (2011). Principia Iuris: Teoría del Derecho y de la Democracia. Vol I. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. et al. (2019). Noncitizen Voting Rights in the Global Era: A Literature Review and Analysis. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 21 (3), 949–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filgueira, B., & Mason, I. (2011). Is There Any Evidence of Earth Jurisprudence in Existing Law. In Burdon, P., ed., Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence, Kent Town, SA: Wakefield Press, pp. 192–203.Google Scholar
Filippov, M., Ordeshook, P. C., & Shvetsova, O. (2004). Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finchelstein, F. (2019). From Fascism to Populism in History, Berkely: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fine, S. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration: Self-Determination and the Right to Exclude. Philosophy Compass, 8 (3), 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, S. E. (1999). Empires, Monarchies, and the Modern State. Volume III of The History of Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finkel, J. S. (2008). Judicial Reform as Political Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelman, P. (2014). Slavery and the Founders: Race and Liberty in the Age of Jefferson. 3rd edn, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, C. (2015). Terrorism and the Right to Resist: A Theory of Just Revolutionary War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. (1998). Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. (2011 [1980]). Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fioravanti, M. (2007). Siéyès et le jury constitutionnaire: perspectives historico-juridiques, Annales historiques de la Révolution française, 349, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, M., & Abrams, S. (2008). Political Polarization in the American Public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. (2000). Mission Impossible. Settling the Just Bounds Between Church and State. In Feldman, S. M., ed., Law & Religion. A Critical Anthology. New York: New York University Press, pp. 383–410.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. C. (2007). Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. et al. (2017). The Legally Disruptive Nature of Climate Change. Modern Law Review, 80 (2), 172–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J. S. (2018). Democracy When the People Are Thinking. Revitalizing our Politics through Public Deliberation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J. S., & Pozen, D. E. (2018). Asymmetrical Constitutional Hardball. Columbia Law Review, 118 (3), 915–982.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. (1993). The Limits of Judicial Independence. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 25 (1), 57–76.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G. (1957). The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law. Recueil des cours – Académie de Droit International, 92, 1–227.Google Scholar
Flavin, P. (2016). Labor Union Strength and Equality of Political Representation. British Journal of Political Science, 48 (4), 1075–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, J. ed. (2011). Getting to the Rule of Law: NOMOS L, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, K. (2008). Reason, Right and Revolution: Kant and Locke. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36 (4), 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, A. (2020). Survey Article: The Legitimacy of International Courts. Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (4), 476–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, A., & Wind, M. (2009). Introduction: Nordic Reluctance Towards Judicial Review Under Siege, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 27 (2), 131–142.Google Scholar
Fombad, C. M. (2017). An Overview of Contemporary Models of Constitutional Review in Africa. In Fombad, C. M., ed., Constitutional Adjudication in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–48.Google Scholar
FOMC. (2020). Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy, Washington, DC: Federal Open Market Committee.Google Scholar
Foner, E. (2019). The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Foran, J. (1996). Reinventing the Mexican Revolution: The Competing paradigms of Alan Knight and John Mason Hart. Latin American Perspectives, 23 (4), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foran, J. (2005). Taking Power: On the Origins of Third World Revolutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foran, J., Lane, D., & Zivkovic, A., eds. (2008). Revolution in the Making of the Modern World: Social Identities, Globalization and Modernity. Abdingdon Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forbath, W. (2001). Constitutional Welfare Rights: A History, Critique and Reconstruction. Fordham Law Review, 69 (5), 1821–1892.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2002). Contexts of Justice. Political Philosophy Beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2012). The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Jeffrey Flynn (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2014). Justification and Critique. Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2016). The Justification of Basic Rights. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 45 (3), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. (2017a). Normativity and Power. Analyzing Social Orders of Justification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. (2017b). Political Liberalism: A Kantian View. Ethics, 128 (1), pp. 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. (2017c). Toleration. In Zalta, E., ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition). Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/toleration/.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2019). The Justification of Progress and the Progress of Justification. In Allen, A., & Mendieta, E., eds., Justification and Emancipation. The Critical Theory of Rainer Forst. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 17–37.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2020a). The Point of Justice: On the Paradigmatic Incompatibility of Rawlsian “Justice as Fairness” and Luck Egalitarianism. In Mandle, J., Roberts-Cady, S., & Rawls, J., eds., Debating the Major Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R (2020b). The Constitution of Justification. Replies and Comments. In Herlin-Karnell, E., & Klatt, M., eds., Constitutionalism Justified. Rainer Forst in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 295–346.Google Scholar
Forsthoff, E. (1954). Begriff und Wesen des sozialen Rechtsstaates. Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 12, 9–36.Google Scholar
Forsthoff, E. (1961). Lehrbuch des Verwaltungsrechts, vol. I, 8th edn, Munich, Berlin: C.H. Beck’sche.Google Scholar
Forsthoff, E. (1971). Der Staat der Industriegesellschaft. Dargestellt am Beispiel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Forsyth, M. (1981). Union of States: The Theory and Practice of Confederations, Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Fortas, A. (1968). Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience, New York: The American Library.Google Scholar
Fortescue, J. (1997). On the Laws and Governance of England. Edited by Lockwood, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. Edited by Senellart, M.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fournier, P., et al. (2011). When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizen Assemblies on Electoral Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, R., & Blackwell, J. (2014). The Devil in the Detail: Parliament and Delegated Legislation, London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
Fox-Decent, E. (2008). Is the Rule of Law Really Indifferent to Human Rights? Law and Philosophy, 27 (6), 533–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Decent, E. (2011). Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Decent, E. (2019). New Frontiers in Public Fiduciary Law. In Criddle, E., Miller, P., & Sitkoff, R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 910–924.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2017 [1941]). The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, P., & Vauchez, A. (2017). Sphère Publique, Intérêts Privés: Enquête sur un Grand Brouillage. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2017. [Available in English as Vauchez, A., and France, P. (2021). The Neoliberal Republic: Corporate Lawyers, Statecraft, and the Making of Public-Private France, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, D. (2017). The Decline of the Dormant Commerce Clause. Denver Law Review 94 (2), 255–319.Google Scholar
Frank, T. (2005). Legality and Legitimacy in Humanitarian Intervention. In Nardin, T., & Williams, M., eds., Humanitarian Intervention: NOMOS XLVII. New York: New York University Press, pp. 143–157.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G. (1985). Critical Comparisons: Re-Thinking Comparative Law. Harvard International Law Journal, 26 (2), 411.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G. (2006). Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals, and Ideology – Toward a Layered Narrative. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4 (3), 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. H. (1978). John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty: Mixed Monarchy and the Right of Resistance in the Political Thought of the English Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, M. (1970). Legal Method in the Philosophies of Hegel and Savigny. Tulsa Law Review, 44 (4), 766–797.Google Scholar
Frantz, L. (1962). The First Amendment in the Balance. Yale Law Journal, 71 (8), 1424–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fredman, S. (2008). Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, S. (2016). Substantive Equality Revisited. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (3) 712–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, M. (2016). After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22 (1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, A. (1990). Antidiscrimination Law: The View from 1989. In Kairys, D., ed., The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 121–150.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29 (4), 371–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frega, R. (2020). Il populismo di sinistra come altro della socialdemocrazia. In Masala, A., & Viviani, L., L’età dei populismi, Rome: Carocci, 227–254.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1962). Should there be an Independent Monetary Authority? In Yeager, L., ed., In Search of a Monetary Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review, 58 (1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Friedmann, D. (2016). The Purse and the Sword: The Trials of Israel’s Legal Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, C. J. (1963). Man and His Government: An Empirical Theory of Politics, New York: McGraw Book Company.Google Scholar
Friedrich, C. J. (1968). Trends of Federalism in Theory and Practice, London: Frederick A. Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, D., & Dolan, P. (2016). Happiness-Based Policy Analysis. In Adler, M., & Fleurbaey, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 286–317.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The Morality of Law, rev. edn, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2004). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2007). Minipublics: Deliberative Designs and Their Consequences. In Rosenberg, S. W., ed., Deliberation, Participation, and Democracy: Can the People Govern? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovation in Empowered Participatory Governance, London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Furedi, F. (2017). Populism and the European Culture Wars: The Conflict of Values between Hungary and the EU, London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furet, F. (1981). Interpreting the French Revolution. Translated by E. Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furet, F. (2000). The Passing of an Illusion: The Idea of Communism in the Twentieth Century. 2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gabor, D., & Ban, C. (2016). Banking on Bonds: The New Links Between States and Markets. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54 (3), 617–635.Google Scholar
Gabor, D., & Vestergaard, J. (2016). Towards a Theory of Shadow Money. INET Working Paper. Institute for New Economic Thinking.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H., (2004). Truth and Method. Translated by J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gagnon, A.-G., ed. (2009). Contemporary Canadian Federalism, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, A-G, & Tully, J., eds. (2001). Multinational Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gajda-Roszczynialska, K., & Markiewicz, K. (2020). Disciplinary Proceedings as an Instrument for Breaking the Rule of Law in Poland. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 12 (3), 451–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1997). Time to Ditch the NAIRU. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (1), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gales, J., ed. (1834). The Debates and Proceedings of the Congress of the United States, vol. I. Washington, DC: Gales and Seaton.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, B. (2001). Amending Constitutions through the Referendum Device. In Mendelsohn, M., & Parkin, A., eds., Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds. (2015). Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems: Controversies, Changes, and Challenges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, D. J. (2008). Constitutional Paradox or the Potential of Constitutional Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28 (2), 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, B. (1997). Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote. American Journal of Political Science, 41 (1), 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamper, A. (2005). A “Global Theory of Federalism”: The Nature and Challenges of a Federal State. German Law Journal, 6 (10), 1297–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, M. (2005). Gandhi: Selected Writings. Edited by Duncan, R.. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Ganghof, S. (2014). Bicameralism as a form of Government (or: Why Australia and Japan Do Not Have a Parliamentary System). Parliamentary Affairs, 67 (3), 647–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganghof, S. (2015). Is the “Constitution of Equality” Parliamentary, Presidential or Hybrid? Political Studies, 63 (4), 814–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganghof, S. (2018). A New Political System Model: Semi-parliamentary Government. European Journal of Political Research, 57 (2), 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganghof, S. (2021). Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism: Democratic Design and the Separation of Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, C. (2016). A Political Theory for the Jewish People, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Agustín, Ó. (2020). Left-Wing Populism: The Politics of the People, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, L., Grande, I., & Cussó, R. (2017). La Question Moreno face à l’essor du séparatisme en catalogne. L’identité duale est-elle nationale? Pôle Sud, 47 (2), 119–132.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S. (2010). A Democratic Defense of Constitutional Balancing. Law and Ethics of Human Rights, 4 (1), 78–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, S. (2011). The Structure and Scope of Constitutional Rights. In Ginsburg, T., & Dixon, R., eds., Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 278–297.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S. (2013). The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, S. (2014). Separation of Powers and the Growth of Judicial Review in Established Democracies (or Why has the Model of Legislative Supremacy Mostly been Withdrawn from Sale?). The American Journal of Comparative Law, 62 (3), 613–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. R., (1906). The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1625–1660, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. (2011). Can There be a Written Constitution? In Green, L., & Leiter, B., eds., Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 162–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. (2012). Some Types of Law. In J. Gardner, Law as a Leap of Faith: Essays on Law in General, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. (2018). From Personal Life to Private Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2003). The Majoritarian Reading of the Rule of Law. In Maravall, J. M., & Przeworski, A., eds., Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2010). The Legal Foundations of Inequality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2013). Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810–2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2019). Why Do We Care about Dialogue. In Young, K., ed., The Future of Social and Economic Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlicki, L. (2007). Constitutional Courts Versus Supreme Courts. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5 (1), 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlicki, L. (2019). Constitutional Court and Politics. The Polish Crisis. In Landfried, C., ed., Judicial Power. How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsey, P. (2007). Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garoupa, N., & Ginsburg, T. (2009). Guarding the Gardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Indpendence. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 57 (1), 103–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, J., & Wright, E. O. (2018). Legislature by Lot: Envisioning Sortition within a Bicameral System. Politics & Society, 46 (3), 303–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, J., & Wright, E. O. (2019). Legislature by Lot, Envisioning Sortition Within A Bicameral System. In Gastil, , & Wright, , eds., Legislature by Lot. Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance. London, New York: Verso, pp. 3–38.Google Scholar
Gathii, J. T. (2001). Re-Characterizing the Social in the Constitutionalization of the WTO: A Preliminary Analysis. Widener Law Symposium Journal, 7 (1), 137–174.Google Scholar
Gauchet, M. (1995). La révolution des pouvoirs: La souveraineté, le peuple, et la représentation, 1789–1799, Paris: Gallimard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G. (1996). Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G., & Vallier, K. (2009). The Roles of Religious Conviction in a Publicly Justified Polity: The Implications of Convergence, Asymmetry and Political Institutions. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35 (1–2), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, G., & Webber, G. (2010). What Is a Political Constitution? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30 (2), 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. (2019). The Digital Party: Political Organization and Online Democracy, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, M., et al. (2018). Deliberative Abilities and Deliberative Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis). British Journal of Political Science, 48 (4), 1093–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardt, M. (2019). The Federal Impeachment Process: A Constitutional and Historical Analysis, 3rd edn, Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, H. (2007). The Hydraulics of Constitutional Reform: A Skeptical Response to Our Democratic Constitution. Drake Law Review, 55, 925–943.Google Scholar
Gerrards, J., & Senden, H., (2009). The Structure of Fundamental Rights and the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (4), 619–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstenberg, O. (2004). What Constitutions Can Do (but Courts Sometimes Don’t): Property, Speech, and The Influence of Constitutional Norms on Private Law. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 17 (1), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstenberg, O. (2018). Euroconstitutionalism and Its Discontents, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstenberg, O. (2021). Fundamental Rights and Democratic Sovereignty in the EU: The Role of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFREU) in Regulating the European Social Market Economy. Yearbook of European Law, 39 (1), 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genn, H. (2009). Judging Civil Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genovese, E. D. (1992). From Rebellion to Revolution: Afro-American Slave Revolts in the Making of the Modern World, Baton Rogue: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Getachew, A. (2019). Worldmaking After Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyh, C. G. (2013). The Dimensions of Judicial Impartiality. Florida Law Review, 65 (2), 493–551.Google Scholar
Gherghina, S., Racu, A., Giugal, A., Gavris, A., Silagadze, N., & Johnston, R. (2019). Non-voting in the 2018 Romanian Referendum: The Importance of Initiators, Campaigning and Issue Saliency. Political Science 71 (3), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, E. (2010). Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2), 327–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, E. (2018). Deliberative Constitutionalism: An Empirical Dimension. In Levy, R., Kong, H., Orr, G., & King, J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1973). Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica, 41 (4), 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. A. (2009). Confirmation Politics and the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination. American Journal of Political Science, 53 (1), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierke, O. (1868–1913). Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht, 4 vols., Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1900). The Political Theories of Middle Ages. Translated by F. W. Maitland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1958). Political Theories of the Middle Age. Translated by F. W. Maitland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (2019 [1889]). The Social Role of Private Law. Translated by E. McGaughey. German Law Review, 19 (4), 1017–1116.Google Scholar
Gil, R. Z. (2008). De la Expectativa al Desconcierto: El Proceso Constituyente de 1991 Visto por sus Protagonistas, Cali: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.Google Scholar
Gilad, S. (2014). Beyond Endogeneity: How Firms and Regulators Co‐construct the Meaning of Regulation. Law & Policy, 36 (2), 134–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F. (2009). Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Gilardi, F., Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2006). Regulation in the Age of Globalization: The Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies across Europe and Latin America. In Hodge, G., ed., Privatisation and Market Development: Global Movements in Public Policy Ideas. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 127–147.Google Scholar
Gill, S., & Claire Cutler, A., eds. (2014). New Constitutionalism and World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilley, B. (2006). The Meaning and Measure of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45 (3), 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillis, J. (2018). The Montreal Protocol, a Little Treaty That Could. The New York Times, October 19, sec. Science. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2013/12/10/science/the-montreal-protocol-a-little-treaty-that-could.html.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, D., & Menashi, S. (2010). Nondelegation and the Unitary Executive. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 12 (2), pp. 251–276.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T. (2020). Authoritarian International Law? The American Journal of International Law, 114 (2), 221–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T., & Elkins, Z. (2019). One Size Does Not Fit All: The Provision and Interpretation of Presidential Term Limits. In Baturo, A., & Elgie, R., eds., The Politics of Presidential Term Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T., & Huq, A. (2016). Assessing Constitutional Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T., & Huq, A. (2018). How to Save a Constitutional Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., & Moustafa, T., eds. (2008). Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T., & Simpser, A., eds. (2013). Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. (2014). Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review? The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 30 (3), 587–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendon, M. A. (1991). Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, A., & Schmulow, A. (2021). Cambridge Handbook of Twin Peaks Financial Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goitein, E., (2020). Opinion: The Power Trump Can Wield Like a Dictator. New York Times. 12 February [viewed 12 June 2020]. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/opinion/trump-emergency-act.html.Google Scholar
Gold, A., & Miller, P., eds. (2014). Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldoni, M. (2012). At the Origins of Constitutional Review: Sieyès’ Constitutional Jury and the Taming of Constituent Power. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 32 (2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldoni, M., & Wilkinson, M. (2018). The Material Constitution. Modern Law Review, 81 (4), 567–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, J. (1999). The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J. (2010). Parliamentary Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golia, A., & Peters, A. (2022). The Concept of International Organization. In Klabbers, J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to International Organizations Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, M. A. (2018). African Dominion: A New History of Empire in Early and Medieval West Africa, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Jacome, J. (2011). Emergency Powers and the Feeling of Backwardness in Latin American State Formation. American University International Law Review, 26 (4), 1073–1106.Google Scholar
González-Salzberg, D. (2011). Economic and Social Rights within the Inter-American Court. International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional, 9 (18), 117–154.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C., & Lastra, R. (2018). Populism and Central Bank Independence. Open Economies Review, 29 (1), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. (2007). Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (1), 40–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. (2008). The Place of Parties. In Innovating Democracy. Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. (2016). Enfranchising All Subjected, Worldwide. International Theory, 8 (3), 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R., & Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics & Society, 34 (2), 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R., & Jackson, F. (2007). Freedom from Fear. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R., & Spiekermann, K. (2018). An Epistemic Theory of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R., & Tanasoca, A. (2014). Double Voting. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92 (4), 743–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, M. (2005–6). Human Dignity in Supreme Court Constitutional Jurisprudence. Nebraska Law Review, 84 (3), 740–794.Google Scholar
Goodman, S. W. (2014). Immigration and Membership Politics in Western Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and Administration: A Study in Government, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotanda, N. (1991). A Critique of “Our Constitution Is Color Blind.” Stanford Law Review, 44 (1), 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, C. (2004). Globalising Democracy and Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, C. (2014). Interactive Democracy: The Social Roots of Global Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Australia. (2016). Juries, no. 47 of 1967. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20160309085701/ www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/1967-47/19680101-44861/pdf/1967-47.pdf [Viewed 9 March 2016].Google Scholar
Government of New Zealand. About this visa: skilled migrant category resident visa. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20180715224216/https://www.immigration.govt.nz/new-zealand-visas/apply-for-a-visa/about-visa/skilled-migrant-category-resident-visa [Viewed 15 July 2018].Google Scholar
Graber, M. (2010). Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1989). The Modern Prince and Other Writings. Translated by Louis Marks. New York: International Publisher Company.Google Scholar
Gravelle, S. (1988). The Latin-Vernacular Question and Humanist Theory of Language and Culture. Journal of the History of Ideas, 49 (3), 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, G., & Silbey, S. (2014). Governing Inside the Organization: Interpreting Regulation and Compliance. American Journal of Sociology, 120 (1), 96–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graziani, A. (2003). The Monetary Theory of Production, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grear, A. (2014). Towards “Climate Justice?”: A Critical Reflection on Legal Subjectivity and Climate Injustice: Warning Signals, Patterned Hierarchies, Directions for Future Law and Policy. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 5, 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. (2016). The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. (2011). The Supreme Court as a Constitutional Court. Harvard Law Review, 124 (1), 124–153.Google Scholar
Greenwald, G. (2011). Obama Libya War Powers Debate: Obama’s Lawyers Are Worse than Bush’s. Huffpost. 19 June [viewed 12 June 2020]. Available from: www.huffpost.com/entry/obama-libya-lawyers-war-powers_n_879951Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E., eds. (2017). The Sage Handbook of Organizational institutionalism, Los Angeles, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grégoire, H. (2002 [1794]). Rapport sur la nécessité et les moyens d’anéantir les patois et d’universaliser l’usage de la langue française. In de Certeau, M., Julia, D., & Revel, J., eds., Une politique de la langue. La Révolution française et les patois: l’enquête de Grégoire. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 331–351.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. A. G. (1979). The Political Constitution. Modern Law Review, 42 (1), pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorescu, A. (2015). Democratic Intergovernmental Organizations? Normative Pressures and Decision-Making Rules, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigoriadis, I. N. (2018). Democratic Transition and the Rise of Populist Majoritarianism: Constitutional Reform in Greece and Turkey, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (1986). The Modern State: Continental Traditions. In Kaufmann, F.-X., Majone, G., & Ostrom, V., eds., Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 89–109.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2004). Treaty or Constitution? The Legal Basis of the European Union after Maastricht. In Eriksen, E. O., Fossum, J. E., & Menendez, A. J., eds., Developing a Constitution for Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 7–89.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2010). The Achievement of Constitutionalism and Its Prospects in a Changed World. In Dobner, P., & Loughlin, M., eds, The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2016). Constitutionalism: Past, Present and Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2017). The Constitution of European Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2019a). Constitutionalisation without Constitution: A Democracy Problem. In Barber, N. W., Cahill, M., & Ekins, R., eds., The Rise and Fall of the European Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2019b). What Exactly Is Political about Constitutional Adjudication? In Landfried, C., ed., Judicial Power. How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2020a). Neue Radikalkritik an der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Der Staat, 59 (3), 321–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2020b). Recht oder Politik? Die Kelsen-Schmitt-Kontroverse zur Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und die heutige Lage, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, E. (1968). Dissent – 1968 Style [The George Abel Dreyfous Lecture on Civil Liberties, given at the Tulane University School of Law, New Orleans, La.]. United States of America Congressional Record – Proceedings and Debates of the 90th Congress, Second Session. 114 (8), 9407–10822.Google Scholar
Grodzins, M. (1996). The American System. Edited by Elazar, D. J.. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.Google Scholar
Grofman, B., & Feld, S. (1988). Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective. American Political Science Review, 82 (2), 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., & Setälä, M., eds. (2014). Deliberative Mini-publics: Practices and Prospects, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Gross, O. (2003). Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always be Constitutional? Yale Law Journal, 112 (5), 1011–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, O. (2004). Prohibition on Torture. In Levinson, S., ed., Torture: A Collection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, O. (2008). Extralegality and the Ethic of Political Responsibility. In Ramraj, V. V., ed., Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, O., & Ni Aolain, F. (2006). Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guastini, R. (2019). An Analytical Foundation of Rule Scepticism. In Duarte, D., Lopes, P. M., & Sampaio, J. S., eds., Legal Interpretation and Scientific Knowledge. New York: Springer, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
Guerrero, A. (2014). Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42 (2), 135–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, P. (1981). Initiatives and Referendums: Direct Democracy and Minority Interests. Urban Law Annual Review, 22, 135–159.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. (2010). Enforcement and Compliance Strategies. In Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M., eds., Oxford Handbook on Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 120–145.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (2009). Organizational Trust and the Limits of Management‐based Regulation. Law & Society Review, 43 (4), 865–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guntermann, E. (2020). Does Economic Inequality Undermine Political Equality? Testing Two Common Assumptions. Electoral Studies, 69, 102–202.Google Scholar
Gushee, D. (2013). A Christian Theological Account of Human Worth. In McCrudden, C., ed., Understanding Human Dignity. London: The British Academy, pp. 275–288.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, J. (2019). Philippines Officially Leaves the International Criminal Court. The New York Times, March 17, sec. World. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2019/03/17/world/asia/philippines-international-criminal-court.html.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. (2000). Religion and state in the United States: A Defense of Two-Way Protection. In Rosenblum, N., ed., Obligations of Citizenship and the Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A. (2003). Identity in Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2012). The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. (2011). Against Consent. Virginia Journal of International Law, 52 (4), 747–790.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. (2013). International Organizations and the Frankenstein Problem. European Journal of International Law, 24 (4), 999–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyorfi, T. (2016). Against the New Constitutionalism, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society, London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Boston: Beacon Pres.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1985). Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State. Translated by J. Torpey. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30, 95–116.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, W. Rehg, trans. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 43–115.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992 [1962]). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 92 (3), 109–131.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (2001). Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles? Political Theory, 29 (6), 766–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (2008). Between Naturalism and Religion. Translated by Ciaran Cronin, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2010). The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights. Metaphilosophy, 41 (4), 464–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, E., & Haslanger, S., eds. (2006). Theorizing Feminisms: A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, D., Querze, A., & Lindaman, K. (2007). Lose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights. Political Research Quarterly, 60 (2), 304–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hailbronner, M. (2017). Transformative Constitutionalism: Not Only in the Global South. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 65 (3), 527–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, Z., Gerber, E., & Louch, H. (2002). Minorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections. The Journal of Politics, 64 (1), 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, A. (2014, May). Unfair Shares. Presented at the Bristol Festival of Ideas event, Bristol.Google Scholar
Hale, M. (1976). The Prerogatives of the King. Edited by Yale, D. E. C.. London: Selden Society.Google Scholar
Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, F. (1999). Revolution and World Politics: The Rise and Fall of the Sixth Great Power, London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, S. (2004). Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Halmai, G. (2018). Is There Such Thing as “Populist Constitutionalism”? The Case of Hungary. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11 (3), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmai, G. (2019). Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism. German Law Journal 20 (3), 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, S. M. (1986). The Disorderly Universe of Consociational Democracy. West European Politics, 9 (2), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, P. (2014). Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. (1961a [1788]). The Federalist No. 70. In Madison, J., Hamilton, A., Jay, J., & Cooke, J. E., eds., The Federalist. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, pp. 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. (1961b [1787]). The Necessity of a Government as Energetic as the One Proposed to the Preservation of the Union. In Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J., eds., The Federalist Papers. Edited by C. Rossiter. New York: New American Library, pp. 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1961 [1787–88]). The Federalist Papers. Edited by Rossiter, C.. New York: New American Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2003 [1787–88]). The Federalist; With Letters of Brutus. Edited by Ball, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2008 [1787–88]). The Federalist Papers. Edited by Goldman, L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D., & Darity, W. 2010. Can “baby Bonds” Eliminate the Racial Wealth Gap in Putative Post-Racial America? Review of Black Political Economy, 37 (3–4), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R., & Nichols, J. (2019). The Tin Ear of the Court: Ktunaxa Nation and the Foundation of the Duty to Consult. Alberta Law Review, 56 (3), 729–760.Google Scholar
Hammergren, L. (2002). Do Judicial Councils Further Judicial Reform? Lessons from Latin America. Carnegie Endowment Rule of Law Series’ Working Paper No. 28.Google Scholar
Hampshire, S. (2000). Justice Is Conflict, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanretty, C., & Koop, C. (2011). Measuring the Formal Independence of Regulatory Agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 19 (2), 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, A. F. (2004). Is There a Politically Optimal Level of Judicial Independence? The American Economic Review, 94 (3), pp. 712–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S., & Kroeger, S. (2021). How a Lack of Truthfulness Can Undermine Democratic Representation: The Case of Post-referendum Brexit Discourses. British Jurnal of Politics and International Relations, 23 (4), 609–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (1999). Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (2000). Democratic Epistemology and Accountability. Social Philosophy and Policy, 17 (1), 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (2013). Why a Constitution? In Galligan, D., & Versteeg, , eds., Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harel, A. & Kahana, T. (2010). The Easy Core Case for Judicial Review. Journal of Legal Analysis, 2, 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, C. (2002). Accountability in the European Union. In Alston, P., & de Witte, B., eds., Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, C. (2006). Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values. European Journal of International Law, 17 (1), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2009). Law and Administration, 3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J. (1992 [1656]). The Commonwealth of Oceana. Edited by Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. (2003). Profiles in Injustice: Why Racial Profiling Cannot Work, New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, K. (2013). Federalism and Climate Policy Innovation: A Critical Reassessment. Canadian Public Policy, 34 (Suppl. 2), S95–S108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are There Any Natural Rights? Philosophical Review, 64 (2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1973). Rawls on Liberty and Its Priority. University of Chicago Law Review, 40 (3), 534–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1982). Bentham on Legal Rights. In Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, J. (2003). The Rule of Law 1603–1660: Crown, Courts, and Judges, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartz, L. (1955). The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havercroft, J., Eisler, J., Shaw, J., Wiener, A., & Napoleon, V. (2020). Decolonising Global Constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism, 9 (1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayduk, R. (2006). Democracy For All: Restoring Immigrant Voting Rights in the United States, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayduk, R., & Coll, K. (2018). Urban Citizenship: Campaigns to Restore Immigrant Voting Rights in the US. New Political Science, 40 (2), 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Rules and Order. Vol. I of Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1976). The Mirage of Social Justice. Vol. II of Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hazell, R. (2015). The United Kingdom. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, A. (1989). Recognizing the Variety Among Constitutional Conventions. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 22 (1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, A. (1991). Canadian Constitutional Conventions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (2020). The Machinery of Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research. (2021). Conflict Barometer 2020, Heidelberg: HIIK.Google Scholar
Heimberger, P., & Kapeller, J. (2017). The Performativity of Potential Output: Pro-cyclicality and Path Dependency in Coordinating European Fiscal Policies. Review of International Political Economy, 24 (5), 904–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinzerling, L. (2019). A Meditation on Juliana v. United States. SSRN. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3395471Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1967 [1821]). Philosophy of Right. Edited and translated by T. M. Knox. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991 [1821]). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Edited by Wood, A.. Translated by H. B. Nisbett. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbrunn, J. (2004). Anti-Corruption Commissions Panacea or Real Medicine to Fight Corruption? Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.Google Scholar
Heldt, E., & Schmidtke, H. (2019). Global Democracy in Decline? How Rising Authoritarianism Limits Democratic Control over International Institutions. Global Governance, 25 (2), 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, H. (1987 [1930]). Rechtsstaat or Dictatorship? Economy and Society, 16 (1), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, H. (1996 [1934]). The Nature and Structure of the State. Cardozo Law Review, 18 (3), 1139–1216.Google Scholar
Heller, H. (2019 [1927]). Sovereignty: A Contribution to the Theory of Public and International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, G. (2002). The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy. American Political Science Review, 69 (2), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, G. (2017). Institutions on the Edge: The Origins and Consequences of Inter-Branch Crises in Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, L. (2004). Five Ways of Institutionalizing Political Opposition: Lessons from Advanced Democracies. Government and Opposition, 39 (1), 22–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L. (1979). How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd edn, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hennette-Vauchez, S. (2011). A Human Dignitas: Remnants of the Ancient Legal Concept in Contemporary Dignity Jurisprudence. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9 (1), 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, L. (2017). Democratic Partisanship: From Theoretical Ideal to Empirical Standard. American Political Science Review, 111 (4), 783–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Herron, E. S., & Randazzo, K. A. (2003). The Relationship Between Indpendence and Judicial Review in Post-Communist Courts. The Journal of Politics, 65 (2), 422–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuschling, L. (2021). État de droit: The Gallicization of the Rechtsstaat. In Meierhenrich, J., & Loughlin, M., eds., The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heupel, M., & Zürn, M. (2017). Protecting the Individual from International Authority: Human Rights in International Organizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, T. (2019). The Republican Core of the Case for Judicial Review. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (1), 288–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higonnet, P. (1998). Goodness Beyond Virtue: Jacobins During the French Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hiebert, J. L. (2005). Interpreting a Bill of Rights: The Importance of Legislative Rights Review. British Journal of Political Science, 35 (2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiebert, J. L. (2006). Parliamentary Bills of Rights: An Alternative Model? Modern Law Review, 69 (1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiebert, J. L., & Kelly, J. B. (2015). Parliamentary Bills of Rights: The Experiences of New Zealand and the United Kingdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillbink, L. (2007). Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R. (2010). Constitutional Theocracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, R. (2015). The Origins of the New Constitutionalism: Lessons from the “Old” Constitutionalism. In Gill, S., & Butler, A. C., eds., New Constitutionalism and World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–107.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (1989). The Pluralist Theory of the State: Selected Writings of G. D. H. Cole, J. Figgis, and H. J. Laski, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoar, R. S. (2004). Constitutional Conventions: Their Nature, Powers and Limitations, Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1991 [1651]). Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1988). Leviathan, ed. Richard Tuck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1999). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. Edited by Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobolt, S. B. (2009). Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1996a [1962]). The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1996b). The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (2016) Strangers in their Own Land. Anger and Mourning on the American Right, New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, R., & James, A. (2020). Money from Nothing: Or, why we should stop worrying about debt and learn to love the Federal Reserve, New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Hockett, R., & Omarova, S. (2017). The Finance Franchise. Cornell Law Review, 102 (5), 1143.Google Scholar
Hockin, T. A. (1971). The Roles of the Loyal Opposition in Britain’s House of Commons: Three Historical Paradigms. Parliamentary Affairs, 25 (1), 50–68.Google Scholar
Hoexter, C. (2017). South African Administrative Law at a Crossroads: The PAJA and the Principle of Legality. Admin Law Blog, 28 April 2017. Available from: adminlawblog.org/2017/04/28Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. (1964 [1919]). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H., eds. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. (1913/1920). Law and the Court. In Holmes, O. W, ed., Collected Legal Papers. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (1993). Gag Rules or the Politics of Omission. In Elster, J., & Slagstad, R., eds., Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (1995). Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (2012). Constitutions and Constitutionalism. In Rosenfeld, M., & Sajo, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, S., & Sunstein, C. (1999). The Cost of Rights, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Hong, L., & Page, S. (2004). Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of High-Ability Problem Solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 101 (46), 16385–16389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honig, B. (1993). Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, B. (2017). Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair, New York City: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, T. (1994). The Basic Norm of a Society. In Paulson, S. L., & Litchewski Paulson, B., eds., Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001). Government of Risk, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration, London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Höpner, M., & Schmidt, S. (2020). Can We Make the European Fundamental Freedoms Less Constraining? A Literature Review. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 22, 182–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörcher, F. (2017). Is the Historical Constitution of Hungary Still a Living Tradition? A Proposal for Reinterpretation. In Górnisiewicz, A., & Szlachta, B., eds., The Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought. Warsaw, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. L. (1991). A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society, Berkeley: University of California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, D. L. (2004). The Alternative Vote and Interethnic Moderation: A Reply to Fraenkel and Grofman. Public Choice, 121 (3/4), 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, D. L. (2013). Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, D. L. (2014). Ethnic Power-Sharing: Three Big Problems. Journal of Democracy, 25 (2), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwill, H. (1908). The Problem of the House of Lords. Political Science Quarterly 23 (1), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwill, H. (1925). The Usages of the American Constitution, Glasgow: The University Press.Google Scholar
House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee. (2019). Disinformation and “Fake News”: Final Report, Eighth Report of Session 2017–19, HC 1791, 18 February 2019.Google Scholar
Howard, J. (2019). Dangerous Speech. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 47 (2) 208–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, W., & Moe, T. (2020). Presidents, Populism, and the Crisis of Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueglin, T. O. (1999). Early Modern Concepts for a Late Modern World: Althusius on Community and Federalism, Waterloo: WLU Press.Google Scholar
Hueglin, T. O., & Fenna, A. (2006). Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Enquiry, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Hueglin, T. O., & Fenna, A. (2015). Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Enquiry, 2nd edn, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. v. (1920 [1792]). Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen, Leipzig: Meiner Verlag. [translated as W. v. Humboldt (1854) The Sphere and Duties of Government. Translated by Joseph Coulthard. London: John Chapman].Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1978 [1739–40]). A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A. & Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1985 [1742]). On the Independence of Parliament. In Miller, E. F., ed., Essays: Moral, Political, Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1998 [1748]). Of Parties in General. In K. Haakonssen, ed., Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. ed. (2010). Human Rights and Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. (2014). Climate Justice: The Claim of the Past. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 5, 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, M. H. (1987). Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2021). Marx’s Critique and the Constitution of the Capitalist State. In O’Connell, P., & Otzsu, U., eds., Research Handbook on Law and Marxism. Chetelham: Edward Elgar, pp. 190–208.Google Scholar
Huq, A. (2019). A Tactical Separation of Powers?, University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 709. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3369820Google Scholar
Hurd, I. (2011). Is Humanitarian Intervention Legal? The Rule of Law in an Incoherent World. Ethics & International Affairs, 25 (3), 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, T. (2005). Proportionality in the Morality of War. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (1), 34–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, N. (2003). The Jurisprudence of Emergency: Colonialism and The Rule of Law, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hylland, A. (2007). Opening the archives (in Norwegian). Working Paper. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Ignazi, P. (2017). Party and Democracy: The Uneven Road to Party Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihara, C. K. (2004). Are Individual Rights Necessary? A Confucian Perspective. In Shun, K.-L., & Wong, D. B., eds., Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, S. (2019). Rule by Multiple Majorities: A New Theory of Popular Control, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inuit Circumpolar Conference. (2005). Petition to the Inter American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting from Global Warming Caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States.Google Scholar
Invernizzi Accetti, C., & Wolkenstein, F. (2017). The Crisis of Party Democracy, Cognitive Mobilization and the Case for Making Parties More Deliberative. American Political Science Review, 111 (1), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionescu, G., & de Madariaga, I. (1972). Opposition: Past and Present of a Political Institution, Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
IPCC. (1990). Policymaker Summary of Working Group I (Scientific Assessment of Climate Change). In Climate Change: The 1990 and 1992 IPCC Assessments. Available from: www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/ipcc_90_92_assessments_far_wg_I_spm.pdfGoogle Scholar
IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In Field, C. B. et al., eds., Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. (2018). Summary for Policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte, et al., eds., Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Available from: www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ipsen, H. P. (1972). Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Irfan, A. (2020). An Unusual Revolution: The Palestinian Thawra in Lebanon, c 1969–1982. Durham Middle East Papers.Google Scholar
Isaac, R., Mathieu, D., & Zajac, E. (1991). Institutional Framing and Perceptions of Fairness. Journal of Constitutional Political Economy, 2 (3), 329–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishay, M. (2004). The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J. (2012). Explaining Ethnic Bloc Voting in Africa. Democratization, 19 (4), 761–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama Smithey, S., & Ishiyama, J. (2002). Judicial Activism in Post-Communist Politics. Law & Society Review, 36 (4), 719–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isiksel, T. (2013). Between Text and Context: Turkey’s Tradition of Authoritarian Constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (3), 702–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isiksel, T. (2016). Europe’s Functional Constitution: A Theory of Constitutionalism Beyond the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, S. (2015). Fragile Democracies. Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, S., & Pildes, R. H. (1998). Politics as Market: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process. Stanford Law Review, 50 (3), 643–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, S., & Pildes, R. H. (2004). Between Civil Libertarianism and Executive Unilateralism: An Institutional Process Approach to Rights During Wartime. In Tushnet, M., ed., The Constitution in Wartime: Beyond Alarmism and Complacency. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 161–197.Google Scholar
Issing, O. (2008). The Birth of the Euro, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. (2018). The Failure of British and Irish Federalism, circa 1800–1950. In Schütze, R., & Tierney, S., eds., The United Kingdom and the Federal Idea. Oxford: Hart, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
Jackson, A., & Dyson, B. (2012). Modernising Money: Why Our Monetary System Is Broken and How it Can be Fixed, London: Positive Money.Google Scholar
Jackson, K. (2022). All the Sovereign’s Agents: The Constitutional Credentials of Administration. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 30 (3), 777–824.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. (2003). Warlords as Alternative Forms of Governance. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 14 (2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, V. (2012). Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies. In Rosenfeld, M., & Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54–74.Google Scholar
Jacobson, G. (2010). Constitutional Identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jaconelli, J. (1999). The Nature of Constitutional Convention. Legal Studies, 19 (1), 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaconelli, J. (2005). Do Constitutional Conventions Bind. Cambridge Law Journal, 64 (1), 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakubowski, A., & Wierczyńska, K., eds., (2016). Fragmentation vs the Constitutionalisation of International Law: A Practical Inquiry, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, J. A. (1887). A Treatise on Constitutional Conventions, 4th edn, Chicago: Callaghan and Co.Google Scholar
Jansen, R., & Aelen, M. (2015). Biases in Supervision: What are they and how can we deal with them? DNB Occasional Studies 1306. Netherlands: De Nederlansche Bank.Google Scholar
Jaria-Manzano, J. I. (2019). Law in the Anthropocene. In Jaria-Manzano, J., & Borras, S., eds., Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Edgar Publishing, pp. 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaria-Manzano, J. I., & Borràs, S. (2019). Introduction to the Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism. In Jaria-Manzano, J., & Borras, S., eds., Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Edgar Publishing, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva, 41 (3), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2017). Science and Democracy. In Felt, U. et al., eds., The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 259–288.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T., eds. (2001). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Jefferson, T. (1905 [1810]). Letter from Thomas Jefferson to John B. Colvin, 20 September 1810. In P. L. Ford, ed., The Works of Thomas Jefferson. vol. XI. New York, NY: GP Putnam’s Sons. Article 2, Section 3, Document 8.Google Scholar
Jelin, E. (2000). Towards a Global Environmental Citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 4 (1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, I. W. (1959). Cabinet Government, 3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, I. W. (1961). The British Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, I. W. (1963). The Law and the Constitution, London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Jesse, N. G., & Williams, K. P. (2010). Ethnic Conflict: A Systemic Approach to Cases of Conflict, Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2019). Critical Theory of the State. In Christodoulidis, E., Dukes, R., & Goldoni, M., eds., Research Handbook on Critical Legal Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 114–134.Google Scholar
Jestaedt, M. et al (2020). The Federal Constitutional Court – The Court without Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhaveri, S., & Ramsden, M., eds. (2021). Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Origins and Adaptations across the Common Law World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jodoin, S. et al. (2020). Realizing the Right to be Cold? Framing Processes and Outcomes Associated with the Inuit Petition on Human Rights and Global Warming. Law and Society Review, 54 (1), 168–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John Paul II. (1995). Encyclical Letter “Evangelium Vitae.” Vatican. Available from: http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae.htmlGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. (1978). Law as the Articulation of the State in Western Germany: A German Tradition Seen from a British Perspective. West European Politics, 1 (2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., Arel‐Bundock, V., & Portniaguine, V. (2019). Adding Rooms onto a House We Love: Central Banking after the Global Financial Crisis. Public Administration, 97 (3), 546–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. S. (1993). The French State in Question. Public Law and Political Argument in the Third Republic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, N. (2017). Let immigrants reunite with their parents: NZ people’s party. New Zealand Herald. 7 July. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20181009012654/ www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11886934 [Viewed 9 October 2018]Google Scholar
Jordan, W. (1968). White Over Black: American Attitudes toward the Negro, 1550–1812, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D., eds. (2004). The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, S. (2011). Blame it on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joss, S. (1998). Danish Consensus Conferences as a Model of Participatory Technology Assessment. Science and Public Policy, 25 (1), 2–22.Google Scholar
Jouanjan, O. (2004). Braucht das Verfassungsrecht eine Staatslehre? – Eine französische Perspektive. Europäische Grundrechtezeitschrift, 31 (13), 362–370.Google Scholar
Jouanna, A. (1998). Les temps de guerre de religion en France, 1559–1598. In Jouanna, A. et al., eds., Histoire et dictionnaire des guerres de religion. Paris: Laffont, pp. 6–445.Google Scholar
Jubb, R. (2019). Disaggregating Authority: What’s Wrong with Rawlsian Civil Disobedience. Political Studies, 67 (4), 955–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission. 2008. Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar
Kagan, E. (1992). The Changing Faces of First Amendment Neutrality: R.A.V. v St Paul, Rust v Sullivan, and the Problem of Content-Based Underinclusion. Supreme Court Review, 1992, pp. 29–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, E. (1996). Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine. University of Chicago Law Review, 63 (2), 413–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, E. (2001). Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review, 114 (8), 2245–2385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. (2003). Comparative Constitutionalism in a New Key. Michigan Law Review, 101 (8), 2677–2705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. (2004). Putting Liberalism in Its Place, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, S. P., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A., eds. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A., eds. (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kairys, D., ed. (1990). The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Kaisary, P. (2015). Hercules, the Hydra, and the 1801 Constitution of Toussaint Louverture. Atlantic Studies, 12 (4), 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenbrunner, A., & Painceira, J. P. (2017). The Impossible Trinity: Inflation Targeting, Exchange Rate Management and Open Capital Accounts in Emerging Economies. Development and Change, 48 (3), 452–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Populism vs. Constitutionalism? Comparative Perspectives on Contemporary Western Europe, Latin America, and the United States. The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Policy Brief.Google Scholar
Kammen, M. (2006). A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kälin, C., & Kochenov, D., (2020). The nationality index. The Nationality Index. Available from: www.nationalityindex.com/. [Viewed 29 November 2020.]Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1991). Kant: Political Writings, 2nd edn. Edited by Reiss, H. S.. Translated by H. B. Nisbett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1996 [1784]). An Answer to the Question: “What Is Enlightenment?” In Kant, I., ed., Practical Philosophy, Edited and translated by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2007 [1784]). Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. In Zöller, G. & Louden, B. eds., The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Anthropology, History, and Education. Translated by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (2012 [1785]). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited and translated by Mary Gregor, Jens Timmerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2017 [1797]). The Metaphysics of Morals. Edited by Dennis, L., translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, J., & Garoupa, N. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, 2003–2014, Constitutional Political Economy, 27 (1), 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, L. (2019a). On the Design of Legal Rules: Balancing versus Structured Decision Procedures. Harvard Law Review, 132 (3), 992–1065.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. (2019b). Balancing versus Structured Decision Procedures: Antitrust, Title VII Disparate Impact, and Constitutional Law Strict Scrutiny. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 167 (6), 1375–1462.Google Scholar
Karlan, P. (2007). Judicial Independences. The Georgetown Law Journal, 95 (4), 1041–1059.Google Scholar
Karlan, P., & Cole, D. 2020. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 1933–2020.” New York Review of Books, October. Available from: www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/10/22/ruth-bader-ginsburg/.Google Scholar
Karmis, D. (1998). Fédéralisme et relations intercommunautaires chez Tocqueville: entre prudence et négation des possible. Politique et Sociétés, 17 (3), 59–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmis, D., & Norman, W., eds. (2005). Theories of Federalism, New York: Palgrave-Macmillan Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaswan, A. (2008). A Cooperative Federalism Proposal for Climate Change Legislation: The Value of State Autonomy in a Federal System. Denver University Law Review, 8 (4), 791–839.Google Scholar
Kateb, G. (1992). “Remarks on the Procedures of Constitutional Democracy,” In The Inner Ocean: Individualism and Democratic Culture, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, R., & Mair, P. (2009). The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement. Perspectives on Politics, 7 (4), 753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1987). Policy and Politics in West Germany. The Growth of a Semisovereign State, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kaupa, C. (2016). The Pluralist Character of the European Economic Constitution, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A. (2002). Original Intention, Enacted Text and Constitutional Interpretation. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 47 (1), 255–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, A. (2009). Constitutional Review Under the UK Human Rights Act, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, M. (2001). Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-sovereignty Era, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedar, S. (2001). The Legal Transformation of Ethnic Geography: Israeli Law and the Palestinian Landholder 1948–1967. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 33, 923–1000.Google Scholar
Keller, S. (2004). Welfare and the Achievement of Goals. Philosophical Studies, 121 (1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D. (2017). From King’s Prerogative to Constitutional Dictatorship as Reason of State. In Kapossy, B., Nakhimovsky, I., & Whatmore, R., eds., Commerce and Peace in the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 300–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, K. (2017). Woodrow Wilson and the Challenge of Federalism in World War One. In Lev, A., ed., The Federal Idea: Public Law Between Governance and Political Life. Oxford: Hart, pp. 167–188.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. (2020). Short Money. House of Commons Research Briefing Paper SN01663. [online] London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1928). Der soziologische und der juristische Staatsbegriff. Kritische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses von Staat und Recht, 2nd edn, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1929). Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit. In Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 5, 30–88.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1932). Wer soll der Hater der Verfassung sein? [Who Should be the Guardian of the Constitution?], Die Justiz, 6 (11/12), 576–628.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1942). Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and American Constitution. Journal of Politics, 4 (2), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1946a). General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Anders Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1946b). Natural Law Doctrine and Legal Positivism. In Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Anders Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 389–446.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1948). The Political Theory of Bolshevism, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1952). Principles of International Law, New York: Rinehart & Company, Inc. republished by New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. in 2003.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1967 [1960]). Pure Theory of Law, 2nd edn, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1981). Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts, 2nd edn, Aalen: Scientia Verlag.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1992 [1934]). Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2013 [1929]). The Essence and Value of Democracy. Edited by Urbinati, N. & Invernizzi-Accetti, C.. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2015). Who Ought to be the Guardian of the Constitution. In Vinx, L., ed., The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174–221.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1979). The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries. Buffalo Law Review, 28 (2), 205–382.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1980). Towards an Historical Understanding of Legal Consciousness: The Case of Classical Legal Thought in America, 1850–1940. Research in Law and Sociology, 3, 3–24.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1997). A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siècle, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2008). A Left Phenomenological Critique of the Alternative to Hart/Kelsen Theory of Legal Interpretation. In his Legal Reasoning: Collected Essays. Aurora: The Davies Group Publishers.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2011). A Transnational Genealogy of Proportionality in Private Law. In Brownsword, R., Micklitz, H., Niglia, L., & Weatherill, S., eds., The Foundations of European Private Law. London: Hart Publishing, pp. 185–220.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2014). The Hermeneutic of Suspicion in Contemporary American Legal Thought. Law Critique, 25 (2), 91–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2020). A Political Economy of Contemporary Legality. In Kjaer, P. F., ed., The Law of Political Economy: Transformations of the Function of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshavarzian, A., & Mirsepassi, A., eds. (2021). Global 1979: Geographies and Histories of the Iranian Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, J. K. (2014). The Administrative Origins of Modern Civil Liberties Law, Columbia Law Review, 114 (5), 1083–1167.Google Scholar
Khaitan, T. (2019). Constitutional Directives. Modern Law Review, 82 (4), 603–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaitan, T. (2021a). Balancing Accountability and Effectiveness: A Case for Moderated Parliamentarism. Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law, 7 (1), 81–155.Google Scholar
Khaitan, T. (2021b). Guarantor Institutions. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 16 (S1), S40–S59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. E., & Margalit, Y. (2017). Informed Preferences? The Impact of Unions on Workers’ Policy Views. American Journal of Political Science, 61 (3), 728–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, J., & Cole, R. (2004). Public Opinion on Federalism in Canada, Mexico and the USA in 2003. Publius, 33 (3), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. (1997). Running Scared: Why America’s Politicians Campaign Too Much and Govern Too Little, New York: Martin Kessler Books.Google Scholar
King, D. (1995). Actively Seeking Work? The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States and Great Britain, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, D. (1997). Separate and Unequal: Black Americans and the US Federal Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (2008). Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28 (3), 409–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (2012). Judging Social Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (2013). Constitutions as Mission Statements. In Galligan, D., & Versteeg, M., eds., Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (2015). Parliament’s Role following Declarations of Incompatibility under the Human Rights Act. In Hooper, H., Hunt, M. & Yowell, P., eds., Parliaments and Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 165–192.Google Scholar
King, J. (2018). Social Rights in Comparative Constitutional Theory. In Jacobson, G., & Schor, M., eds., Comparative Constitutional Theory. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
King, J. (2019a). Martin Krygier and the Tempering of Power. Hague Journal of the Rule of Law, 11 (2–3), 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (2019b) The Democratic Case for a Written Constitution, Current Legal Problems, 72 (1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (2022). Effective Governance and the Social Dimension of the Rule of Law. In Jackson, V., & Dawood, Y., eds., Constitutionalism and a Right to Effective Government? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (2024). The Social Dimension of the Rule of Law. In: Cambridge UK: Cambridge Handbook for Constitutional Theory.Google Scholar
King, Jr., M. L. (1963). Letter from a Birmingham jail. Available from: www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., & Stewart, R. B. (2005). The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68 (3/4), 15–61.Google Scholar
Kingston, L. N. (2019). Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, O., & Neumann, F. (1987). Social Democracy and the Rule of Law. Translated by L. Turner. Edited by Tribe, K.. Translated by L. Tanner and K. Tribe. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kishlansky, M. (1986). Parliamentary Selection: Social and Political Choice in Early Modern England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissinger, H., (2001). The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction. Foreign Affairs, 80 (4), 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J. (2009). An Introduction to International Institutional Law, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J. (2015). The EJIL Foreword: The Transformation of International Organizations Law. European Journal of International Law, 26 (1), 9–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J., Peters, A., & Ulfstein, G. (2009). The Constitutionalization of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klare, K. (1998). Legal Culture and Tranformative Constitutionalim. South African Journal on Human Rights, 14 (1), 146–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarman, M. (2016). The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, C., & Sajó, A. (2012). Constitution-Making: Process and Substance. In Rosenfeld, M., & Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 419–438.Google Scholar
Klein, S. (2020a). A Good War: Mobilizing Canada for the Climate Emergency, Toronto: ECW Press.Google Scholar
Klein, S. (2020b). The Work of Politics: Making a Democratic Welfare, Cambridge, UK: Cambrige University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, S. (2021). Democracy Requires Organized Collective Power. Journal of Political Philosophy. Online first.Google Scholar
Klein, S., & Lee, C.-S. (2019). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Civil Society: The Politics of Forward and Backward Infiltration. Sociological Theory, 37 (1), 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinig, J. (2014). On Loyalty and Loyalties: The Contours of a Problematic Virtue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinlein, T., & Peters, A. (2018). International Constitutional Law. In Oxford Bibliographies. Available from: www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199796953/obo-9780199796953-0039.xml.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, J. T. (1986). Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American thought, 1870–1920, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr, K, (1944). British Colonial Theories 1570–1850, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J. H. (2009). Climate Change and Human Rights Law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 50 (1), 163–218.Google Scholar
Knudsen, C., & Tsoukas, H. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koch, C. M. (2020). Varieties of populism and the challenges to Global Constitutionalism: Dangers, promises and implications, Global Constitutionalism, Online first, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochi, T. (2020). Global Justice and Social Conflict: The Foundations of Liberal Order and International Law, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kolodny, N. (2014). Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42 (4), 287–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kommers, D. (2001). Autonomy versus Accountability: The German Judiciary. In Russel, P. H., & O’Brien, D. M., eds. Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, pp. 131–154.Google Scholar
Kommers, D., & Miller, R., eds. (1997). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kong, H. (2015). Election Law and Deliberative Democracy: Against Deflation. Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law, 9, 35–58.Google Scholar
Kong, H., & Levy, R. (2018). Deliberative Constitutionalism. In Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 625–639.Google Scholar
Koop, C., & Lodge, M. (2017). What Is Regulation? An Inter-Disciplinary Concept Analysis. Regulation and Governance, 11 (1), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, A. M. (2015). Debating the American State: Liberal Anxieties and the New Leviathan, 1930–1970, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A. (2002). Is Judicial Independence a Useful Concept? In Burbank, S. B., & Friedman, B., eds., Judicial Independence at the Crossroads. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 45–55.Google Scholar
Korsch, K. (2013). Revolutionary Theory. Edited by Kellner, D.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kosař, D. (2016). Perils of Judicial Self-Fovernment in Transitional Societies: Holding the Least Accountable Branch to Account, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosař, D., & Šipulová, K. (2023). Comparative Court-Packing. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 21 (1), 80–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, R. (1989 [1967]). Preußen zwischen Reform und Revolution: Politische Reform in Preußen und in Süddeutschen Staaten, 1800–1820, München: Deutschen Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (1992). Verwaltung, Amt, Beamter. Einleitung. In O. Brunner, W. Conze, & R. Koselleck, eds., Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostal, R. (2005). A Jurisprudence of Power: Victorian Empire and the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. (2012). Arguing Global Environmental Constitutionalism. Transnational Environmental Law, 1 (1), 199–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzé, L. (2016). Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. (2018). Six Constitutional Elements for Implementing Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. In Daly, E., & May, J. R., eds, Implementing Environmental Constitutionalism: Current Global Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajewski, M. (2019). International Organizations or Institutions, Democratic Legitimacy. In Peters, A., & Wolfrum, R., eds., Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, L. (2004). The People Themselves: Popular Constitutional and Judicial Review, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (1998). Rights without Trimmings. In Kramer, M., Simmonds, N. E., & Steiner, H., A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7–111.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. (2007). Objectivity and the Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2010). Refining the Interest Theory of Rights. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 55 (1), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2017). Liberalism with Excellence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2021). Freedom of Expression as Self-Restraint, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranenpohl, U. (2010). Hinter dem Schleier des Beratungsgeheimnisses, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N. (2016). Pouvoir constituant and pouvoir irritant in the postnational order. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (3), 637–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnaswamy, S. (2009). Democracy and Constitutionalism in India, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krygier, M. (2011). Four Puzzles about the Rule of Law: Why? What? Where? And Who Cares? In Fleming, J., ed., Getting to the Rule of Law: NOMOS L. New York: New York University Press, pp. 64–104.Google Scholar
Krygier, M. (2012a). Philip Selznick: Ideals in the World, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Krygier, M. (2012b). The Rule of Law. In Sajó, A., & Rosenfeld, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, pp. 233–249.Google Scholar
Krygier, M. (2014). Inside the Rule of Law. Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto, 3 (1), pp. 77–98.Google Scholar
Krygier, M. (2017). Tempering Power. In Adams, M. et al., eds, Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Ideas and Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühn, Z. (2012). Judicial Administration Reforms in Central-Eastern Europe: Lessons to be Learned. In Seibert-Fohr, A., ed. Judicial Independence in Transition. Dodrecht: Springer, pp. 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V. (2016). International Law, Kelsen and the Aberrant Revolution: Excavating the Politics and Practices of Revolutionary Legality in Rhodesia and Beyond. In Rajkovic, N. M., Aalberts, T. E., & Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., eds., The Power of Legality: Practices of International Law and Their Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumhof, M., & Benes, J. (2012). The Chicago Plan Revisited. IMF Working Paper 12/202. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Kumm, M. (1999). Who Is the Final Arbiter of Constitutionality in Europe? Three Conceptions of the Relationship between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review, 36 (2), 351–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M. (2005). The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty. European Law Journal, 11 (3), 262–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M. (2009). The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship Between Constitutionalism in and Beyond the State. In Dunoff, J. L., & Trachtman, J. P., eds., Ruling the World? International Law, Global Governance, Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M. (2010a). The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Between Constitutional Triumphalism and Nostalgia. In Dobner, P., & Loughlin, M., eds., The Twilight of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kumm, M., (2010b). The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review. Law and Ethics of Human Rights, 4 (2), 142–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M. (2013). The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2), 605–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M. (2016). Constituent Power, Cosmopolitan Constitutionalism, and Post-Positivist Law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (3), 697–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M., & Walen, A., (2014). Human Dignity and Proportionality. In Huscroft, G., Miller, B., & Webber, G., eds., Proportionality and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
Kumm, M., Lang, A., Tully, J., & Wiener, A. (2014). How Large Is the World of Global Constitutionalism? Global Constitutionalism, 3 (1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurian, J., (2016). Expanding the idea of India. The Hindu. 15 July. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20190106042838/ www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/Expanding-the-Idea-of-India/article14488980.ece. [Viewed 6 January 2019].Google Scholar
Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1977). Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85 (3), 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the Vernacular, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyritsis, D. (2014). Whatever Works: Proportionality as a Constitutional Doctrine. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34 (2), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. (2000). Pluralist Thought and the State in Britain and France, 1900–25. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. (2008). Critical Republicanism. The Hijab Controversy and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. (2013). Political Liberalism and Religion: On Separation and Establishment. Journal of Political Philosophy, 21 (1), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. (2014). Equal Liberty, Non-Establishment and Religious Freedom. Legal Theory, 20 (1), pp. 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. (2017a). Liberalism’s Religion, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. (2017b). The Evanescence of Neutrality. Political Theory, 46 (1), 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C., & Maynor, J., eds. (2007). Republicanism and Political Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lacerda, A. D. F. (2020). The Normative Bases of Semi-Presidentialism: Max Weber and the Mitigation of Caesarism. Brazilian Political Science Review, 14 (1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, J. (2017). Centripetal Democracy: Democratic Legitimacy and Political Identity in Belgium, Switzerland and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCroix, A. (2011). The Ideological Origins of American Federalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladeur, K-H. (2012). The Emergence of Global Administrative Law and Transnational Regulation. Transnational Legal Theory, (3) 3, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, C. (2015). Deliberation, Participation and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Minipublics Shape Public Policy? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23 (1), 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, C. (2016). Philosophical Foundations of Judicial Review. In Dyzenhaus, D., & Thorburn, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, C. (2017). Can Democracy be Deliberative and Participatory? The Democratic Case for Political Uses of Minipublics. Daedalus, the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 146 (3), 85–105.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2023). A Democracy, If We Can Keep It. Remarks on J. Habermas’s The New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Constellations.Google Scholar
Laing, M., & McCaffrie, B. (2013). The Politics Prime Ministers Make: Political Time and Executive Leadership in Westminster Systems. In Strangio, P., Hart, P., & Walter, J., eds., Understanding Prime Ministerial Performance: Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–101.Google Scholar
Lake, D., Martin, L., & Risse, T. (2021). Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization, 75 (2), 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, D., & Pevnik, R. (2021). Is Random Selection a Cure for the Ills of Electoral Representation? Journal of Political Philosophy, 29 (1), 46–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, D. (2018). Populist Constitutions. University of Chicago Law Review, 85 (2), 521–544.Google Scholar
Landau, R. S. (1995). Specifying Absolute Rights. Arizona Law Review, 37 (1), 209–225.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2012). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2019). The Principles of Open Democracy. In Urbinati, N., ed., Thinking Democracy Now: Between Innovation and Regression. Milan: Feltrinelli, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2020). Open Democracy. Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, H., & Page, S. (2015). Deliberation and Disagreement: Problem Solving, Prediction, and Positive Dissensus. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 14 (3), 229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. (1975). The Independent Judiciary in an Interest Group Perspective. Journal of Law and Economics 18 (3), 875–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landfried, C. (1994). The Judicialization of Politics in Germany. International Political Science Review, 15 (2), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landfried, C. (2019). Introduction. In Landfried, C., ed., Judicial Power. How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landfried, C. (2023). Constitutional Review in the European Legal Space: A Political Science Perspective. In: Bogdandy, A. v., Huber, P. M., & Grabenwarter, C., eds., Constitutional Adjudication: Common Themes and Challenges. Volume IV of Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 591–612.Google Scholar
Landis, J. M. (2018). Whither Parties? Hume on Partisanship and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 112 (2), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. (2011). World Trade Law after Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langford, M. (2009). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara, M. P. (2002a). Cultural Citizenship. In Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S., eds., Handbook of Citizenship Studies. London: Sage, pp. 232–243.Google Scholar
Lara, M. P. (2002b). Democracy and Cultural Rights: Is there a New State of Citizenship? Constellations, 9 (2), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, C. M. (1996). Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis. American Journal of Comparative Law, 44 (4), 605–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, S. R. (2021). The Constitutional Theory of the Federation and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassalle, F. (1942). On the Essence of Constitutions. Marxist Archive. Available from: www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/fi/vol03/no01/lassalle.htm.Google Scholar
La Serna, M. (2012). The Corner of the Living: Ayacucho on the Eve of the Shining Path Insurgency, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lastra, R. (2015). International Financial and Monetary Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, R. T. E. (1949). The Law and the Commonwealth, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Law, S. (1984). Rethinking Sex and the Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 132 (5), 955–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, J. (2018). Gruesome Freedom: The Moral Limits of Non-constraint. Philosopher’s Imprint, 18 (3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Laws, S. (2020). Parliamentary Sovereignty, Statutory Interpretation and the UK Supreme Court. In Clarry, D., ed., The UK Supreme Court Yearbook, Volume 10: 2018–2019 Legal Year. London: Appellate Press, pp. 160–206.Google Scholar
Lawson, G. (1992 [1678]). Politica sacra et civilis. Edited by Condren, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, G. (1994). The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State. Harvard Law Review, 107 (6), 1231–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, N. C. (2009). States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, N. C. (2019). Out of Joint: Power, Crisis and the Rhetoric of Time, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, A. (2008). Telephone Justice in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 14 (4), 324–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, L. (2015). Referendums and Deliberative Democracy. Electoral Studies, 38, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C., ed. (2010). Making a World After Empire: The Bandung Moment and Its Political Afterlives. Ohio: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, D. (2008). The Legacy of Medieval Constitutionalism in the Philosophy of Right: Hegel and the Prussian Reform Movement. History of Political Thought, 29 (4), 601–634.Google Scholar
Lee, D. (2013). “Office Is a Thing Borrowed”: Jean Bodin on Offices and Seigneurial Government. Political Theory, 41 (3), 409–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. (2016). Popular Sovereignty in the Early Modern Constitutional Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. Z. (2010). Race, Sex, and Rulemaking: Administrative Constitutionalism and the Workplace, 1960 to the Present. Virginia Law Review, 96 (4), 799–886.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, D. (2007). On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience. Ethics, 117 (2), 202–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefort, C. (2007). Complications: Communism and the Dilemmas of Democracy. Translated by J. Bourg. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1984). Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks. In Goldthorpe, J., ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 60–80.Google Scholar
Leib, E. J. (2004). Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Leib, E. J., Ponet, D., & Serota, M. (2014). Mapping Public Fiduciary Relationships. In Gold, A., & Miller, P., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenard, P., (2016). Democracies and the Power to Revoke Citizenship. Ethics & International Affairs, 30 (1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, T. M. et al. (2019). Climate Tipping Points – Too Risky to Bet Against. Nature Comment, 575, 592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leow, R. (2019). Understanding Agency: A Proxy Power Definition. Cambridge Law Journal, 78 (1), 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G. (2006). Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (4), 705–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G. (2007). A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G. (2015a). Rescuing Proportionality. In: Cruft, R., Liao, S., & Renzo, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 316–340.Google Scholar
Letsas, G. (2015b). The Scope and Balancing of Rights: Diagnostic or Constitutive? In Brems, E., & Gerards, J., eds., Shaping Rights in the ECHR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–64.Google Scholar
Letsas, G. (2017). Reclaiming Proportionality. A Reply to Ripstein. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34 (1), 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G. (2018a). Proportionality as Fittingness. Current Legal Problems, 71 (1), 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G. (2018b). The Margin of Appreciation Revisited: A Response to Follesdal. In Etinson, A., ed., Human Rights: Moral or Political? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lettanie, U. (2019). The ECB’s Performance Under the ESM Treaty on a Sliding Scale of Delegation. European Law Journal, 25 (3), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev, A. (2019). Introduction: Federalism and Public Law Theory. In Lev, A., ed., The Federal Idea: Public Law between Governance and Political Life. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Levellers. (1967). A Remonstrance of Many Thousand Citizens, and Other Free-born People of England, to their Own House of Commons. In Wolfe, D. M., ed., Leveller Manifestoes of the Puritan Revolution. New York: Humanities Press, pp. 112–134.Google Scholar
Lever, A. (2005). Why Racial Profiling Is Hard to Justify. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (1), 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lever, A. (2009). Democracy and Judicial Review: Are They Really Incompatible? Perspectives on Politics, 7 (4), 805–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lever, A. (2017). Democracy, Epistemology and the Problem of All-White Juries. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34 (4), 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lever, A. (2020). A Sense of Proportion: Some Thoughts on Equality, Security and Justice. Res Publica, 26 (3), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, G. B., & Modood, T., eds., (2009). Secularism, Religion and Multicultural Citizenship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, M. E., & Forrence, J. L. (1990). Regulatory capture, public interest, and the public agenda: Toward a synthesis. JL Econ & Org. 6.Google Scholar
Levinson, D. (2011). Parchment and Politics: The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment. Harvard Law Review, 124 (3), 657–746.Google Scholar
Levinson, D., & Pildes, R. (2006). Separation of Parties, Not Powers. Harvard Law Review 119 (8), 2312–2386.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2008). Our Undemocratic Constitution. Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (and How We the People can Correct It), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2011). Do Constitutions Have a Point? Reflections on Parchment Barriers and Preambles. Social Philosophy and Policy, 28 (1), 150–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J. T. (2007). Federalism, Liberalism, and the Separation of Loyalties. American Political Science Review, 101 (3), 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J. T. (2015). Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, J. T. (2016). There Is No Such Thing as Ideal Theory. Social Philosophy and Policy, 33 (1–2), 312–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J. T. (2021). The Separation of Powers and the Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. Review of Constitutional Studies, 25 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Levy, R., Kong, H., Orr, G., & King, , eds. (2018). The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, R., O’Flynn, I., & Kong, H. (2021). Deliberative Peace Referendums, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J. D., Leibfried, S., & Nullmeier, F. (2015). Changing Perspectives on the State, In Leibfried, S., Huber, E., & Lange, M. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–58.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. (2018). Environmental Human Rights and Climate Change Current Status and Future Prospects, Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. A Philosophical Study, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2012). Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ley, I. (2015). Opposition in International Law: Alternativity and Revisibility as Elements of a Legitimacy Concept for Public International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 28 (4), 717–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebenberg, S. (2012). Engaging the Paradoxes of the Universal and Particular in Human Rights Adjudication. The Possibilities and Pitfalls of ‘Meaningful Engagement. African Human Rights Law Journal, 12 (1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, S. (2015). Toward an Equality-Promoting Interpretation Interpretation of Socio-economic Rights in South Africa. Insights from the Egalitarian Liberal Tradition. The South African Law Journal, 132 (2), 411–437.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of Democratic Systems. Comparative Political Studies 1 (1), 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational Democracy. World Politics, 21 (2), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1975). The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, 2nd edn, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1986). Proportionality by Non-PR Methods: Ethnic Representation in Belgium, Cyprus, Lebanon, New Zealand, West Germany and Zimbabwe. In Grofman, B., & Lijphart, A., eds., Electoral Laws and their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 113–123.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1992). Introduction. In Lijphart, A., ed., Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1996). The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation. American Political Science Review, 90 (2), 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2008). Self-determination versus Pre-determination of Ethnic Minorities in Power-Sharing Systems. In Lijphart, A., Thinking About Democracy: Power-Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 66–74.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy, 2nd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, A. C. (2019). President Trump’s War on Regulatory Science. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 43 (2), 247–306.Google Scholar
Lincoln, A. (1861 [1953]). First Inaugural Address. In Basler, R. et al, eds., Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, vol. IV. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 263–271.Google Scholar
Lindahl, H. (2008). Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood. In Loughlin, M., & Walker, N., eds., The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, H. (2013). Fault Lines of Globalisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, H. (2015). Law as Concrete Order. In Dyzenhaus, D., & Poole, T., eds., Law, Liberty and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, W., & Mueller, S. (2021). Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies, 4th edn, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindseth, P. (2004). The Paradox of Parliamentary Supremacy: Delegation, Democracy, and Dictatorship in Germany and France, 1920s–1950s. Yale Law Journal, 113 (7), 1341–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindseth, P. (2010). Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, J. (1990). The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1 (1), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, J. (1994). Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference? In Linz, J., & Valenzuela, A., eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippman, M. (1994). Liberating the Law: The Jurisprudence of Civil Disobedience and Resistance. San Diego Justice Journal, 2 (2), 299–394.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2018). Relational Egalitarianism: Living as Equals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C., & Goodin, R. (2001). Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9 (3), 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2003). Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edn, New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, W. S. (1956). Federalism and Constitutional Change, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobel, J. (1989). Emergency Power and the Decline of Liberalism. Yale Law Journal, 98 (7), 1385–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1980 [1689]). Second Treatise of Government. Edited by Macpherson, C. B.. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1988 [1689]). Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loevy, K. (2016). Emergencies in Public Law: The Legal Politics of Containment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lokdam, H. (2020). “We Serve the People of Europe”: Reimagining the ECB’s Political Master in the Wake of Its Emergency Politics. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58 (4), 978–998.Google Scholar
Lombaerde, P., Söderbaum, F., van Langenhove, L., & Baert, F. (2010). Problems and Divides in Comparative Regionalism. In Laursen, F., ed., Comparative Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Farnham: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lopez-Guerra, C. (2011). The Enfranchisement Lottery. Politics, Philosophy, and Economics, 10 (2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Guerra, C. (2014). Democracy and Disenfranchisement. The Morality of Electoral Exclusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losurdo, D. (2020). War and Revolution: Rethinking the Twentieth Century. Translated by Gregory Elliott. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M. (1992). Public Law and Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (1999). The State, the Crown and the Law. In Sunkin, M., & Payne, S., eds., The Nature of the Crown. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2005). Constitutional Theory: A 25th Anniversary Essay. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25 (2), pp. 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2007). Constituent Power Subverted: From Constitutional Argument to British Constitutional Practice. In Loughlin, M., & Walker, N., eds., The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2010). Foundations of Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2013). The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2014). Constitutional Pluralism: An Oxymoron? Global Constitutionalism, 3 (1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2015). Nomos. In Dyzenhaus, D., & Poole, T., eds., Law, Liberty and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2022). Against Constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2010). A General Theory of Domination and Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, A. L. (1920). The Government of England, new edn, vol. I, New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G. (1981). Hegels Staatsrecht als Stellungsnahme im ersten preußischen Verfassungskampf. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 35 (3/4), 476–501.Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2016). Cultures of Deliberation in Constitutional Courts. In Maraniello, P., ed., Justicia Constitucional, vol. I. Resistencia – Chaco: ConTexto Libreria, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2020a). Das dysfunktionale Gericht. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 6 October, 11.Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2020b). Why Is the German Federal Constitutional Court a Deliberative Court, and Why Is that a Good Thing? In Häcker, B., & Ernst, W., eds., Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Intersentia 2020, pp. 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2022). Beratungskulturen. Wie Verfassungsgerichte arbeiten, und wovon es abhängt, ob sie integrieren oder polarisieren. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Lucy, W. (2014). The Rule of Law and Private Law. In Austin, L., & Klimchuk, D., eds., The Rule of Law and Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–66.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1998). Der Staat des politischen Systems. In Beck, U., ed., Perspektiven der Weltgesellschaft, Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 345–380.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. (1968). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (2005). Power. A Radical View, 2nd edn, Houndsmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, A. (2016). Uninformed: Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What we Can Do about It, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxemburg, R. (2006). Reform or Revolution and Other Writings, Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. (2013). Confronting Injustice: Moral History and Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, W. (2017). Multilevel Citizenship. In Shachar, A. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 644–668.Google Scholar
Mac Amhlaigh, C. (2016). Putting Political Constitutionalism in Its Place. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (1), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, M. (2018). Bernie and the Donald: A Comparison of Left- and Right-Wing Populist Discourse. In Macaulay, M., ed., Populist Discourse: International Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 165–196.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. (1982). Legal Rights and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. (1984). Der Rechtsstaat und die rule of law, Juristenzeitung, 39 (2), 65–70.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. (1989). Spontaneous Order and the Rule of Law: Some Problems. Ratio Juris, 2 (1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, R. (2000). The Charter of the United Nations as a World Constitution. International Law Studies 75 (1), 263–300.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, E. (2016). Constitutional Constraints on Electoral Reform in Canada: Why Parliament Is (Mostly) Free to Implement a New Voting System. Supreme Court Law Review, 76, 400–416.Google Scholar
Macfarquhar, N., & Shadid, A. (2012). Russia and China Block U.N. Action on Syrian Crisis. The New York Times, February 4.Google Scholar
Machiavelli. (1965 [1517]). Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius. In Machiavelli: The Chief Works and Others. Volume 1. Translated by A. Gilbert. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 175–532.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (2005). ‘A Discourse or Dialogue Concerning Our Language’ (ed. and tr.W. J. Landon), In. Landon, W. J., Politics, Patriotism, and Language : Niccolò Machiavelli’s “secular patria” and the Creation of an Italian National Identity. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, M. K., & Warren, M. E. (2012). Two Trust-Based Uses of Minipublics in Democratic Systems. In Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, G. (2012). Rational Ignorance and Beyond. In Landemore, H., & Elster, J., eds., Collective Wisdom: Principles of Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 290–318.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C. A. (1988). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 290–318.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). The Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination, New Jersey: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Macklin, R. (2003). Dignity Is a Useless Concept. British Medical Journal, 327 (7429), 1419–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maclure, J., & Taylor, C. (2011). Secularism and Freedom of Conscience. Translated by J. M. Todd. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, J. (1787). Vices of the Political System. Available from: https://sls-ushistory11.wikispaces.com/file/view/Vices+of+the+Political+System.PDFGoogle Scholar
Madison, J. (1961). Federalist No. 51: The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments. In The Federalist Papers. Edited by Clinton Rossiter. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Maduro, M. (2003). Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action. In Walker, N., ed., Sovereignty in Transition, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Maduro, M. (2005a). The Importance of Being Called a Constitution: Constitutional Authority and the Problem of Constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3 (3), 332–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maduro, M. (2005b). Sovereignty in Europe: The European Court of Justice and the Creation of a European Political Community. In Volcansek, M., & Stack, J., eds., Courts Crossing Borders: Blurring the Lines of Sovereignty. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maeda, Ko (2010). Two Modes of Democratic Breakdown: A Competing Risks Analysis of Democratic Durability. The Journal of Politics, 72 (4), 1129–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnetter, P. (2003). Between Parliamentary Control and the Rule of Law: The Political Role of the Ombudsman in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 10 (5), 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S. (2009). Religious Reason and Secular Affect. Critical Inquiry 35 (4), 836–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmud, T. (1994). Jurisprudence of Successful Treason: Coup d’Etat and Common Law. Cornell International Law Journal, 27 (1), 49–140.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S., & Shugart, M. (1997). Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy. Comparative Politics, 29 (4), 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maistre, J. D. (1994). Considerations on France. Edited by Lebrun, Richard A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1994). The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics, 17 (3), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (2001). Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations. European Union Politics, 2 (1), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (2005). Dilemmas of European Integration. The ambiguities and pitfalls of integration by stealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, D. B. (2013). Introduction: Toward a Constitutionalism of the Global South. In Maldonado, D. B., ed., Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malleson, K. (2002). Safeguarding Judicial Impartiality. Legal Studies, 22 (1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1987). On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. Political Theory, 15 (3), 338–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, B. (2008). The Emergency Paradigm and the New Terrorism: What If the End of Terrorism Was Not in Sight? In Baume, S., & Fontana, B., eds., Les usages de la séparation des pouvoirs. Paris: Michel Houdiard, pp. 136–171 (also available at http://as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/2792/emerg.pdf).Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1993). The Sources of Social Power: Volume II, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. (1997). Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State? Review of International Political Economy, 4 (3), pp. 472–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, G., & Wainwright, J. (2018). Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Manning, J (2003). The Absurdity Doctrine. Harvard Law Review, 116 (8), 2387–2486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J. (2005). Textualism and Legislative Intent. Virginia Law Review, 91 (2), 419–450.Google Scholar
Manning, J. (2006). What Divides Textualists From Purposivists. Columbia Law Review, 106 (1), 70–111.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. ed. (1990). Beyond Self-Interest, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes.” Journal of Politics, 61 (3), 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review, 97 (4), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J., et al. (2010). The Place of Self-interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J., et al. (2012). A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2020). Representation Failure. In Schwartzberg, M., & Viehoff, D., eds., NOMOS LXIII: Democratic Failure. New York: New York University Press, pp. 101–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, H. (1989). Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power, New York: Free Press; London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marceau, G. (2011). IGOs in Crisis? or New Opportunities to Demonstrate Responsibility? International Organizations Law Review, 8 (1), 1−13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcussen, M. (2009). Scientization of Central Banking: The Politics of A-Politicization. In Dyson, K. H. F., & Marcussen, M., eds., Central Banks in the Age of the Euro: Europeanization, Convergence, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marglos, E., & Laurence, S. (2019). Concepts. In E. Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/Google Scholar
Markesinis, B. S., Unberath, H., & Johnston, A. (2010). The German Law of Contract, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Markovits, I. (1996). Children of a Lesser God: GDR Lawyers in Post-Socialist Germany. Michigan Law Review, 94 (7), 2270–2308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, A. (2001). Positive Law and Objective Values, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. (1987). Citizenship and Social Class, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Marten, K. (2007). Warlordism in Comparative Perspective. International Security, 31 (3), 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, J. (2012). Horizontal Structuring. In Rosenfeld, M., & Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 547–575.Google Scholar
Marx, F. M. (1957). The Administrative State: An Introduction to Bureaucracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1849). The Trial of the Rhenish District Committee of Democrats. Neue Rheinische Zeitung, No. 231 and 232, February 1849.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1978a). The Civil War in France. In Tucker, R. ed. The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edn, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, p. 618.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1978b). Critical Marginal Notes on the Article “The King of Prussia and Social Reform”. In Tucker, R. ed. The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edn. W.W. Norton & Company. p. 126.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1978c). On the Jewish Question. In Tucker, R. ed. The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edn. W.W. Norton & Company. p. 26.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1978d). The Class Struggles in France, 1848–1850. In Tucker, R. ed. The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edn. W.W. Norton & Company. p. 586.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1978e). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Tucker, R. ed. The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edn. W.W. Norton & Company. p. 594.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (2000). On the Jewish Question. In McLellan, D., ed., Karl Marx: Selected Writings, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–70.Google Scholar
Masri, M. (2017). The Dynamics of Exclusionary Constitutionalism: Israel as a Jewish and Democratic State, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Masur, J., & Posner, E. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Judicial Role. University of Chicago Law Review, 85 (4), 935–986.Google Scholar
Matikainen, S., Campiglio, E., & Zenghelis, D. (2017). The Climate Impact of Quantitative Easing, London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.Google Scholar
Matsuda, M. J. (1987). Looking to the Bottom: Critical Legal Studies and Reparations. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 22 (2), pp. 323–399.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, J. D. (2020). Let the People Rule. How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Matthes, C.-Y. (2022). Judges as Activists: How Polish Judges Mobilise to Defend the Rule of Law. East European Politics, 38 (3), pp. 468–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, W. (1991). The Logic of Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, E. (2019 [1844]). A Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings, and Usage of Parliament. 25th edn. Available from: https://erskinemay.parliament.uk/Google Scholar
May, J. R., & Daly, E. (2019). Global Climate Constitutionalism and Justice in the Courts. In Jaria-Manzano, J., & Borras, S., eds., Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Edgar Publishing, pp. 235–245.Google Scholar
May, K. (1952). A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision. Econometrica, 20 (4), 680–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, L. (2019). Ancient Legal Thought: Equity, Justice, and Humaneness from Hammurabi and the Pharaohs to Justinian and the Talmud, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. (1983). Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. (2012). Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. (2018). Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Self-government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, A. (2000). The Furies: Violence and Terror in the French and Russian Revolutions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, O. (1924). Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht, 3rd edn, München: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
McBride, M. (2021). The Tracking Theory of Claim-Rights. Analytic Philosophy. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
McCall Rosenbluth, F., & Shapiro, I. (2018). Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, T. (2009). Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, M. W. (2013–2014). Reconsidering Citizens United as a Press Clause Case. Yale Law Journal, 123 (2), pp. 412–458.Google Scholar
McCormick, J. (2008). People and Elites in Republican Constitutions, Traditional and Modern. In Loughlin, M., & Walker, N., eds., The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, J. (2011). Machiavellian Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, C. (2008). Human Dignity in Human Rights Interpretation. European Journal of International Law, 19 (4), 655–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols and Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28 (1), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies. Virginia Law Review, 75 (2), 431–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, A. (2014). Consociational Settlements in Deeply Divided Societies: The Liberal-Corporate Distinction. Democratization, 21 (3), 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, A. (2006). The Logic of Democracy. Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarry, J. (2019). Classical Consociational Theory and Recent Consociational Performance. Swiss Political Science Review, 25 (4), 538–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2009). Power Shared After Death of Thousands. In Taylor, R., ed., Consociational Theory. McGarry and O’Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 15–84.Google Scholar
McGinnis, J., & Movsesian, M. (2000). The World Trade Constitution. Harvard Law Review 114 (2), 511–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlwain, C. H. (1940). Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. H. (2008). Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern, rev. edn, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund Inc.Google Scholar
McKerrell, N. (2019). Explainer: What Scotland’s new citizen assemblies could mean for democracy. The Conversation, July 3. Available from: https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-scotlands-new-citizen-assemblies-could-mean-for-democracy-119793Google Scholar
McKie, R. (2017). How Sea Shepherd lost battle against Japan’s whale hunters in Antarctic. The Guardian. 23 December. Available from: www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/23/sea-shepherd-loses-antarctic-battle-japan-whale-hunters (Accessed: 15 November 2019).Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. (2012). Tax history: why U.S. pursues citizens overseas. The Wall Street Journal. 18 May. Available from: www.wsj.com/articles/BL-WB-34630 [Viewed 29 November 2020].Google Scholar
McLachlan, C. (2020). The Double-facing Foreign Relations Function of the Executive and Its Self-enforcing Obligation to Comply with International Law. In Bomhoff, J., Dyzenhaus, D., & Poole, T., eds., The Double-Facing Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 376–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. (2012). Searching for the State in British Legal Thought. Competing Conceptions of the Public Sphere, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. (2020). Between Sovereign and Subject: The Constitutional Position of the Official. University of Toronto Law Journal, 70 (supp. 2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, J., (2005). Just Cause in War. Ethics and International Affairs, 19 (3), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, L. K., & Shelby, T. (2004). Blackness and Blood: Interpreting African American Identity. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32 (2), 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, V. (2002). Locke’s Militant Liberalism. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 19 (4), 345–365.Google Scholar
Mee, S. (2019). Central Bank Independence and the Legacy of the German Past, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrling, P. (2010). The New Lombard Street: How the Fed Became the Dealer of Last Resort. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, L. et al. (2019). Climate Change and Uncertainty from “above” and “below”: Perspectives from India. Regional Environmental Change, 19 (6), 1533–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierhenrich, J. (2018). The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierhenrich, J. (2021). Rechtsstaat versus the Rule of Law. In Meierhenrich, J., & Loughlin, M., eds., The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierhenrich, J., & Loughlin, M., eds. (2021). The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinecke, F. (1957). Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’État and its Place in Modern History. Translated by D. Scott. Introduction by W. Stark. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meinel, F. (2021). Germany’s Dual Constitution: Parliamentary Democracy in the Federal Republic, Oxford: Hart Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, J., & Ginsburg, T. (2014). Does De Jure Judicial Independence Really Matter?: A Reevaluation of Explanations for Judicial Independence. Journal of Law and Courts, 2 (2), 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, C. H. (2013). Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, J. (2011). Participation in EU Rule-Making: A Rights-Based Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkiti, I. (1984). Person and Community in African Traditional Thought. In Wright, R., ed., African Philosophy: An Introduction. Lanham University Press of America, pp. 171–182.Google Scholar
Menzies, J., & Tiernan, A. (2015). Caretaker Conventions. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercat-Bruns, M. (2015). Les Discriminations Multiples et l’identité Au Travail Au Croisement Des Questions de Libertés et d’égalité. Revue de Droit du Travail, 1, 28–38.Google Scholar
Mercat-Bruns, M. (2016). Discrimination at Work: Comparing European, French, and American Law, Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercat-Bruns, M. (2018). Multiple Discrimination and Intersectionality: Issues of Equality and Liberty. International Social Science Journal, 67 (223–224), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercat-Bruns, M. (2021). Discrimination Intersectionnelle: Une Notion Émergente En Droit Du Travail. Bulletin Joly Travail, 4, 52.Google Scholar
Mérieau, E. (2019). French Authoritarian Constitutionalism and Its Legacy. In Garcia, H. A., & Frankenberg, G., eds., Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Comparative Analysis and Critique. Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar
Merkel, W. (2014). Is There a Crisis of Democracy? Democratic Theory, 1 (2), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkl, A. (1927). Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, Wien/Berlin: Verlag Österreich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, K. (1938). Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3 (5), 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, G. E. (2010). Ordinary Administrative Law as Constitutional Common Law. Columbia Law Review, 110 (2), 479–536.Google Scholar
Metzger, G. E. (2015). The Constitutional Duty to Supervise. Yale Law Journal, 126 (6), 1836–2201.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. S. (2007). The Politics of Protest: Social Movements in America, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (2018a). The Ethics of Consumer Credit: Balancing Wrongful Inclusion and Wrongful Exclusion. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 42 (1), 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. (2018b). The Right to Credit. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26 (3), 304–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, J. D. (2018). Constitutional Coup: Privatization’s Threat to the American Republic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. (1969). Foreword: On Protecting the Poor through the Fourteenth Amendment. Harvard Law Review, 83 (1), 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, F. (1979). Welfare Rights in a Constitutional Democracy. Washington University Law Quarterly, 1979 (3), 659–693.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. (1999). Constitutional Authorship by the People. Notre Dame Law Review, 74 (5), 1605–1630.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. (2000). Human Rights and the Limits of Constitutional Theory. Ratio Juris, 13, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, F. I. (2003a). Ida’s Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System. Fordham Law Review, 72 (2), 345–365.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. I. (2003b). Is the Constitution a Contract for Legitimacy? Review of Constitutional Studies, 8 (2), 101–128.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. I. (2004). Is the Constitution a Contract for Legitimacy? Review of Constitutional Studies, 8 (2), 101.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. (2011). The Interplay of Constitutional and Ordinary Jurisdiction. In Ginsburg, T., & Dixon, R., eds., Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 278–297.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. (2018). Human Rights and Constitutional Rights: A Proceduralizing Function for Substantive Constitutional Law? In Voeneky, S., & Neuman, G., eds., Human Rights, Democracy, and Legitimacy in a World of Disorder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, F. (2019). Political-Liberal Legitimacy and the Question of Judicial Restraint. Jus Cogens, 1 (1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelmann, H., ed. (2005). A Global Dialogue on Federalism: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Governance in Federal Countries, Kingston/Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Michels, R. (1962 [1911]). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchic Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Translated by E. Paul and C. Paul. Introduction by S. Martin Lipset. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Miles, D. (2020). Democracy, the Courts, and the Liberal State: A Comparative Analysis of American and German Constitutionalism, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1977 [1861]). Considerations on Representative Government, in Collected Works, vol. XIX. Edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 371–577.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2001). Nationality in Divided Societies. In Gagnon, A.-G., & Tully, J., eds., Multinational Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2014). Immigration: The Case for Limits. In Cohen, A. I., & Heath Wellman, C., eds., Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 193–206.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2018). What Makes a Democratic People? In Owen, D., ed., Democratic Inclusion: Rainer Bauböck in Dialogue. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 125–142.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2020). Is Self-Determination a Dangerous Illusion? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Miller, F. (1995). Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, P. (2001). Governing by Numbers: Why Calculative Practices Matter. Social Research, 68 (2), 379–396.Google Scholar
Milligan, T. (2013). Civil Disobedience: Protest, Justification and the Law, New York, London: Bloomsbury Acadeemic.Google Scholar
Minority Rights Group International. (2021). Peoples under Threat Data. Available from: https://peoplesunderthreat.org/data/ (Accessed: 13 February 2022).Google Scholar
Minow, M. (1990). Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Minow, M. (2017). Alternatives to the State Action Doctrine in the Era of Privatization, Mandatory Arbitration, and the Internet: Directing Law to Serve Human Needs. Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 52 (1), 145–167.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P., Evans, G., & O’Leary, B. (2009). Extremist Outbidding in Ethnic Party Systems Is Not Inevitable: Tribune Parties in Northern Ireland. Political Studies 57 (2), 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. (2018). Climate Law: Accomplishments and Areas for Growth. Climate Law, 8 (3–4), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modood, T. (2016). State-Religion Connections and Multicultural Citizenship. In Cohen, J., & Laborde, C., eds., Religion, Secularism, and Constitutional Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 182–203.Google Scholar
Moeckli, D. (2011). Of Minarets and Foreign Criminals: Swiss Direct Democracy and Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 11 (4), 774–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeckli, D. (2018). Referendums: Tyranny of the Majority? Swiss Political Science Review, 24 (3), 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B. (2017). Transnational Populism? Representative Claims, Media and the Difficulty of Constructing a Transnational “People”, Javnost-The Public, 24 (2), 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The Past, Present, and Future of a Concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 305–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, J., & Skaaning, S.-E. (2010). Beyond the Radial Delusion: Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy and Non-democracy. International Political Science Review, 31 (3), 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, J., & Skanning, S.-E. (2014). The Rule of Law: Definitions, Measures, Patterns and Causes, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, K. (2018). Popular Sovereignty, Populism and Deliberative Democracy. Philosophical Inquiry, 42 (1/2), 14–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, K. (2019). Justifying the Culture of Justification. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (4), 1078–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möllers, C. (2011b). Pouvoir Constituant-Constitution-Constitutionalisation. In von Bogdandy, A., & Bast, J., eds., Principles of European Constitutional Law. Oxford: Hart, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar
Möllers, C. (2013). The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möllers, C. (2014). Scope and Legitimacy of Judicial Review in German Constitutional Law – the Court versus the Political Process. In Pünder, H., & Waldhoff, C., eds., Debates in German Public Law. Oxford: Hart, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1952). Römisches Staatsrecht, Zweiter Band, 1. Teil, Akademissche Druck-u Verlagsansstalt.Google Scholar
Monnet, E. (2018). Controlling Credit: Central Banking and the Planned Economy in Postwar France, 1948–1973, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monnet, E. (2021). La Banque Providence: Démocratiser les banques centrales et la monnaie, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Montesquieu. (1989 [1748]). The Spirit of the Laws. Edited by Cohler, A., Miller, B. C., & Stone, H. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, A., & O’Doherty, K. (2014). Deliberative Voting: Clarifying Consent in a Consensus Process. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22 (3), pp. 302–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. J. (1988). Horizontalists and Verticalists: The Macroeconomics of Credit Money, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G., Loizides, N., Sandal, N. A., & Lordos, A. (2014). Winning Peace Frames: Intra-Ethnic Outbidding in Northern Ireland and Cyprus. West European Politics, 37 (1), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. (2015). A Political Theory of Territory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales-Gálvez, S. (2017). Living Together as Equals: Linguistic Justice and Sharing the Public Sphere in Multilingual Settings. Ethnicities, 17 (5), 646–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morell, M. (2016). I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton. New York Times, 5 August. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/opinion/campaign-stops/i-ran-the-cia-now-im-endorsing-hillary-clinton.htmlGoogle Scholar
Moretti, F. (2015). Quantitative Formalism: An Experiment, Stanford Literary Lab Pamphlet 1. Available from: https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet1.pdf.Google Scholar
Morgan, E. S. (1988). Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Morgan, I., & Davies, P., eds. (2008). The Federal Nation: Perspectives on American Federalism, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenbesser, L. (2017). The Autocratic Mandate: Elections, Legitimacy and Regime Stability in Singapore. Pacific Review, 30 (2), 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, B. (2004). The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (2020). Legal Sabotage: Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler’s Germany, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, T. (2011). Libya, “Hostilities,” the Office of Legal Counsel, and the Process of Executive Branch Legal Interpretation. Harvard Law Review Forum, 124 (42), 62–74.Google Scholar
Morrison, T., Weiler, J. H. H. (2009). Introduction to the Art Collection of 22, Washington Square North, New York.Google Scholar
Morton, P. A. (1991–1992). Conventions of the British Constitution. Holdsworth Law Review, 15, 114–180.Google Scholar
Moschella, M. (2015). Currency Wars in the Advanced World: Resisting Appreciation at a Time of Change in Central Banking Monetary Consensus. Review of International Political Economy, 22 (1), 134–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motomura, H. (2006). Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of Immigration and Citizenship in the United States, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2013). Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism? The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Policy Brief.Google Scholar
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48 (2), 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudge, S. L., & Vauchez, A. (2018). Too Embedded to Fail: The ECB and the Necessity of Calculating Europe. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 43 (3), 248–273.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mügge, D. (2016). Studying Macroeconomic Indicators as Powerful Ideas. Journal of European Public Policy, 23 (3), 410–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R. (2006). A Defence of Party Spirit. Perspectives on Politics, 4 (4), 713–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R. (2014). The Promise of Party in a Polarized Age, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R., & Rosenblum, N. (2006). Political Liberalism vs. “The Great Game of Politics”: The Politics of Political Liberalism. Perspectives on Politics, 4 (1), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R., & Rosenblum, N. (2015). The Uneasy Place of Parties in the Constitutional Order. In Tushnet, M., Graber, M., & Levinson, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the U.S. Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R., & Rosenblum, N. (2020). The Political Theory of Parties and Partisanship: Catching Up. Annual Review of Political Science, 23 (1), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2012). Militant Democracy. In Rosenfeld, M., & Sajó, A., eds., Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1253–69.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2018). Populism and Constitutionalism. In Kaltwasser, C. R. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 590–606.Google Scholar
Munday, R. (2016). Agency: Law and Principles, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, C. (1994). Review of Law, Liberty and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism. Legal Studies, 14 (3), 456–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, C. (2005). Studies in Constitutional Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murau, S. (2017). Shadow Money and the Public Money Supply: The Impact of the 2007–2009 Financial Crisis on the Monetary System. Review of International Political Economy, 24 (3), 802–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, Z., Connolly, S., & Kassim, H. (2018). Administrative Legitimacy and the Democratic Deficit of the European Union, Journal of European Public Policy, 25 (3), 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mureinik, E. (1992). Beyond a Charter of Luxuries: Economic Rights in the Constitution. South African Journal on Human Rights, 8 (4), 464–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murkens, J. E. K. (2013). From Empire to Union. Conceptions of German Constitutional Law Since 1871, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, W. (1993). Constitutions, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. In Greenberg, D., et. al., eds., Constitutionalism & Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nabulsi, K. (1999). Traditions of War: Occupation, Resistance, and the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabulsi, K., & Takriti, A. R., eds. (2016). The Palestinian Revolution Website. Available from: learnpalestine.politics.ox.ac.ukGoogle Scholar
Nadakavukaren Schefer, K. (2021). Introduction. In Baume, S., Boillet, V., & Martenet, V., eds. Misinformation in Referenda, London: Routledge, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Nader, L., & Mattei, U. (2008). Plunder: When the Rule of Law Is Illegal, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nagel, R. (2002). The Implosion of American Federalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1995). Personal Rights and Public Space. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24 (2), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Decentralized Business Review, 21260. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdfGoogle Scholar
Napoleon, V. (1910 [1804]). The Corsican: A Diary of Napoleon’s Life in His Own Words. Edited by Johnston, R. M.. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Napoleon, V., & Friedland, H. (2014). Indigenous Legal Traditions: Roots to Renaissance. In Dubber, M. D., & Hörnle, T., eds., Oxford Handbook on Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 225–247.Google Scholar
Napoli, P. (2018). What If More Speech Is No Longer the Solution? First Amendment Theory Meets Fake News and the Filter Bubble. Federal Communications Law Journal, 70 (1), 55–104.Google Scholar
Nash, K. (2016). Politicising Human Rights in Europe: Challenges to Legal Constitutionalism from the Left and the Right. International Journal of Human Rights, 20 (8), 1295–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näsströom, S. (2015). Democratic Representation Beyond Elections. Constellations, 22 (1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarajan, U. (2015). Human rights – help or hindrance to combatting climate change? Open Democracy. Available from: www.opendemocracy.net/en/openglobalrights-openpage-blog/human-rights-help-or-hindrance-to-combatting-climate-change/Google Scholar
Natarajan, U., & Khoday, K. (2014). Locating Nature: Making and Unmaking International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 27 (3), 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naudé, G. (2020). Political Considerations upon Refin’d Politicks, and the Master-Strokes of State. Translated by W. King. Edited by Watson, K.. Independently Published.Google Scholar
Neblo, M. (2007). Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring Deliberation. Swiss Political Science Review 13 (4), pp. 527–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, M. (2015). Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, M., & Sterling, K. (2018). Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Necker, J. (2020). On Executive Power in Great States. Edited by Craiutu, A.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Negri, A. (2009). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. Translated by Maurizia Boscagli. 2nd edn, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. (2014). The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding, Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nemacheck, C. (2017). Appointing Supreme Court Justices. In Epstein, L., & Lindquist, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
Nethercote, J. R. (2015). Parliament. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, B. (2015). Public Reason. In Mandle, J., & Reidy, D. A., eds., The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 666–673.Google Scholar
Neuman, G. (2000). Human Dignity in United States Constitutional Law. In Simon, Dieter and Weiss, Manfred, eds., Zur Autonomie des Individuums: Liber Amicorum Spiros Simitis. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 249–271.Google Scholar
Neuman, G. (2003). Human Rights and Constitutional Rights: Harmony and Dissonance. Stanford Law Review, 55 (5), 1863–1900.Google Scholar
Neumann, F. (1944). Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933–44, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, F. (1978). Rechtsstaat, Gewaltenteilung, und Demokratie. In Söllner, A., ed., Wirtschaft, Staat, Demokratie, Aufsätze. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 1930–1954.Google Scholar
Neumann, F. (1987 [1934]). Rechstaat, the Division of Powers and Socialism’. In Kirchheimer, O. and Neumann, F., eds., Social Democracy and the Rule of Law. Edited by K. Tribe. Translated by L. Tanner and K. Tribe. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Ngai, M. (2004). Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, B. (1970). Loi, Règlement and Judicial Review in the Fifth Republic. Public Law, 1970, 251–276.Google Scholar
Nickel, J. (2005). Who Needs Freedom of Religion? University of Colorado Law Review, 76 (4), 941–964.Google Scholar
Nickel, J. (2013). Goals and Rights: Working Together? In Langford, M. et al., eds., The MDGs and Human Rights: Past, Present, and Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–48.Google Scholar
Nicolaïdis, K. (2012). The Idea of European Demoi-cracy. In Dickson, J., & Eleftheriadis, P., eds., Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemeyer, S. (2014). Scaling Up Deliberation to Mass Publics: Harnessing Mini-Publics in a Deliberative System. In Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., & Setälä, M., eds., Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 177–201.Google Scholar
Nino, C. (1997). The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nkrumah, K. (1996). Consciencism: Philosophy and Ideology for De-Colonization, 2nd edn, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Nolte, D., & Schilling-Vacaflor, A., eds. (2012). New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices, London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norman, W. (2006). Negotiating Nationalism: Nation-Building, Federalism, and Secession in the Multinational State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norocel, O. C., & Baluta, I. (2021). Retrogressive Mobilization in the 2018 “Referendum for Family” in Romania. Problems of Postcommunism, 70 (2), 1–10.Google Scholar
North, D. (1993). Institutions and Credible Commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 149 (1), 11–23.Google Scholar
North, D., & Weingast, B. (1989). Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49 (4), 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D., Wallis, J., & Weingast, B. (2009). Violence and Social Orders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, G. (2018). Climate Change Litigation and Narrative: How to Use Litigation to Tell Compelling Climate Stories. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 42 (3), 733–804.Google Scholar
Novak, W. N. (2018). The Progressive Idea of Democratic Administration. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 167 (7), 1823–1848.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2016). Genome Editing: An Ethical Review. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1990). Aristotelian Social Democracy. In Douglass, R. B., Mara, G. M., & Richardson, H. S., eds., Liberalism and the Good. New York: Routledge. pp. 203–252.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice. Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2019). Civil Disobedience and Free Speech. In Lackey, J., ed., Academic Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 170–185.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, M. (1996). The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism, New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oberman, K. (2016). Immigration as a Human Right. In Fine, S. and Ypi, L., eds., Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochoa Espejo, P. (2011). The Time of Popular Sovereignty: Process and the Democratic State, University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (2004). Why the Rule of Law Matters. Journal of Democracy, 15 (4), 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donoghue, A. (2014). Constitutionalism in Global Constitutionalisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
O’Flynn, I. (2017). Pulling Together: Shared Intentions, Deliberative Democracy and Deeply Divided Societies. British Journal of Political Science, 47 (1), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogien, A. (2015). La désobéissance civile peut-elle être un droit? Droit et société, 3 (91), 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oklopcic, Z. (2019). Imagined Ideologies: Populist Figures, Liberalist Projections, and the Horizons of Constitutionalism. German Law Journal, 20 (2), 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Leary, B. (2019). Consociation in the Present. Swiss Political Science Review 25 (4), 556–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Leary, K. (2006). Saving Democracy: A Plan for Real Representation in America, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, D. (1999). Common Values and the Public-Private Divide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, F. (2005). Civil Disobedience for Social Change. Griffith Law Review, 14 (2), 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. (1989). Constructions of Reason. Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, M. 2016. What We Owe Each Other: T.M. Scanlon’s Egalitarian Philosophy. Boston Review, June 2. Available from: www.bostonreview.net/articles/martin-oneill-tm-scanlon-inequality/.Google Scholar
O’Neill, M., & White, S. (2018). Trade Unions and Political Equality. In Collins, H., Lester, G., & Mantouvalou, V., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 252–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongena, S., & Popov, A. (2016). Gender Bias and Credit Access. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48 (8), 1691–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Regan, K. (2017). The Constitution and Administrative Law: Insights from South Africa’s Constitutional Journey. Admin Law Blog. Available from: adminlawblog.org/2017/04/12Google Scholar
Orphanides, A. (2017). ECB Monetary Policy and Euro Area Governance: Collateral Eligibility Criteria for Sovereign Debt. Working Paper No. 5258–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School.Google Scholar
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2004). The Search for American Political Development, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osofsky, H. M. (2007). The Inuit Petition as a Bridge? Beyond Dialectics of Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights. American Indian Law Review, 31 (2), 675–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osofosky, H. M. (2011). Diagonal Federalism and Climate Change Implications for the Obama Administration. Alabama Law Review, 62 (2), 237–303.Google Scholar
Osterkamp, J. (2009). Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in der Tschechoslowakei (1920–1939): Verfassungsidee, Demokratieverständnis, Nationalitätenproblem, Frankfurt-am-Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Ostler, J. (2019). Surviving Genocide: Native Nations and the United States from the American Revolution to Bleeding Kansas, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, M. (1902). Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, 2 vols. Translated by F. Clarke. Preface by James Bryce. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Ottolenghi, E. (2001). Why Direct Election Failed in Israel. Journal of Democracy, 12 (4), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D., & Smith, G. (2018). Sortition, Rotation, and Mandate: Conditions for Political Equality and Deliberative Reasoning. Politics & Society, 46 (3), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozouf, M. (1989). Revolution. In Furet, F., & Ozouf, M., eds., A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 806–817.Google Scholar
Paddock, R. (2020). U.N. Court Orders Myanmar to Protect Rohingya Muslims. The New York Times, January 23, sec. World. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/world/asia/myanmar-rohingya-genocide.html.Google Scholar
Page, E. (2001). Governing by Numbers: Delegated Legislation and Everyday Policymaking, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Paine, T. (1995 [1791]). Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings. Edited by Philp, Mark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pal, M. (2016). Electoral Management Bodies as a Fourth Branch of Government. Review of Constitutional Studies, 21 (1), 85–113.Google Scholar
Pal, M. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: Challenges for Election Law and Administration in Canada.Election Law Journal, 19 (2), 111–261.Google Scholar
Pal, M., & Choudhry, S. (2014). Still Not Equal? Visible Minority Vote Dilution in Canada. Canadian Political Science Review, 8 (1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palermo, F., & Kössler, K. (2017). Comparative Federalism: Constitutional Arrangements and Case Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Paley, W. (2002). The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. R. (2014). The Age of the Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Panayotu, P. (2017). Towards a Transnational Populism: A Chance for European Democracy (?) The Case of DiEM25. Populismus Working Paper No. 5.Google Scholar
Parau, C. E. (2018). Transnational Networking and Elite Self-Empowerment: The Making of the Judiciary in Contemporary Europe and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parekh, B. (1981). Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parekh, B. (2004). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Parrillo, N. (2014). Against the Profit Motive: The Salary Revolution in American Government, 1780–1940, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, J. (2020). The Roles of Referendums in Deliberative Systems. Representation: Journal of Representative Democracy, 56 (4), 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parra, O. (2016). The Protection of Social Rights. In Bertomeu, J., & Gargarella, R., eds., The Latin American Casebook. London: Routledge, pp. 147–171.Google Scholar
Pasquino, P. (1998). Locke on King’s Prerogative. Political Theory, 26 (2), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. (1988). The Patriarchal Welfare State. In Gutmann, Amy, ed., Democracy and the Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patberg, M. (2016). Against Democratic Intergovernmentalism: The Case for a Theory of Constituent Power in the Global Realm. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (3), 622–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, A. (2002). Democratic Secession from a Multinational State. Ethics, 112 (3), 558–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, A. (2006). The Humanist Roots of Linguistic Nationalism. History of Political Thought, 27 (2), 223–262.Google Scholar
Patten, A. (2014). Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. (2021). Dworkin’s Critique of Hart’s Positivism. In Spaak, T., & Mendus, P., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 675–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, C. (2015). Divided Sovereignty: International Institutions and the Limits of State Authority, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pavel, C. (2021a). Law Beyond the State: Dynamic Coordination, State Consent, and Binding International Law, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, C. (2021b). The Rule of Law and the Limits of Anarchism. Legal Theory, 27 (1), 70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, G. (2003). From Warlords to Peacelords? Journal of International Affairs, 56 (2), 181–191.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. (2008). Habermas’ Method: Rational Reconstruction. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 38 (4), pp. 457–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J., & Lin, J. (2019). Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South. The American Journal of International Law, 113 (4), 679–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2015). Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory pathways to cleaner energy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J., & Osofosky, H. M. (2018). A Rights Turn in Climate Litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 7 (1), 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peer, N. O. (2019). Negotiating the Lender of Last Resort: The 1913 Federal Reserve Act as a Debate Over Credit Distribution. New York University Journal of Law & Business, 15 (2), 367–452.Google Scholar
Peled, Y. (2018). Language Barriers and Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare Settings. Bioethics, 32 (6), 360–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennington, K. (1993). The Prince and the Law 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, A. (2020). Narratives of Executive Downfall: Recall, Impeachment, or Coup? In Welp, Y. and Whitehead, L., eds., The Politics of Recall Elections. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perreau, B. (2021). Les Analogies Du Genre: Différance, Intrasectionallité et Droit. In Bosvieux-Onyekwelu, C. and Mottier, V., eds., Genre, Droit et Politique. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Perry, A. (2015). The Crown’s Administrative Powers. Law Quarterly Review 131, 652–672.Google Scholar
Perry, A. (2017). Plan B: A Theory of Judicial Review. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 66/2017, 22. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3075886 (Accessed: 31 August 2019).Google Scholar
Perry, A., & Ahmed, F. (2014). The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations. Cambridge Law Journal 73 (1), 61–85.Google Scholar
Perry, A., & Tucker, P. (2018). Top-Down Constitutional Conventions. Modern Law Review, 81 (5), 765–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perse, H., & Warren, M., eds. (2007). Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pescatore, P. (1983). The Doctrine of “Direct Effect”: An Infant Disease of Community Law. European Law Review, 8, 155–177.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (3), 579–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (2009a). Dual Democracy. In Klabbers, J., Peters, A., & Ulfstein, G., The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 263–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (2009b). Membership in the Global Constitutional Community. In Klabbers, J., Peters, A., & Ulfstein, G., eds., Constitutionalization of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (2011). The Constitutionalisation of International Organisations. In Walker, N., Shaw, J., & Tierney, S., eds., Europe’s Constitutional Mosaic. Oxford: Hart, pp. 264−266.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (2013). Das Gründungsdokument internationaler Organisationen als Verfassungsvertrag. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 68 (1), 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (2016). International Organizations and International Law. In Cogan, J. K., Hurd, I., & Johnstone, I., eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–59.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (2018). Global Constitutionalism: The Social Dimension. In Suami, T., Peters, A., Vanoverbeke, D., & Kumm, M., eds., Global Constitutionalism from European and East Asian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 277–350.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. (2007). Multilevel Judicial Governance of International Trade Requires a Common Conception of Rule of Law and Justice. Journal of International Economic Law, 10 (3), 529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008). Freedom and Probability: A Comment on Goodin and Jackson. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36 (2), 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2014). Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for a Complex World, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2015). Justice, Social and Political. In Sobel, D., Vallentyne, P., & Wall, S., eds., Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2019). Analyzing Concepts and Allocating Referents. In Burgess, A., Cappelen, H., & Plunkett, D., eds., Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 333–357.Google Scholar
Pevnick, R. (2011). Immigration and the Constraints of Justice: Between Open Borders and Absolute Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2011. Towards a Critical Environmental Law. In Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas, ed., Law and Ecology: New Environmental Foundations. London: Routledge, pp. 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, T., Holmes, O., & Bowcott, O. (2016). Beijing Rejects Tribunal’s Ruling in South China Sea Case. The Guardian, July 12, sec. World news. Available from: www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/12/philippines-wins-south-china-sea-case-against-china.Google Scholar
Phillipson, G. (2019). Indeterminate, inaccessible, illegitimate: Three weaknesses constitutional conventions bring to the unwritten constitution. Working Paper. Bristol University.Google Scholar
Piana, D. (2010). Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe: From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pierce, R. J. (1985). The Role of Constitutional and Political Theory in Administrative Law. Texas Law Review, 64 (3), 469–529.Google Scholar
Pierce, Jr., R., Shapiro, S., & Verkuil, P. (2014). Administrative Law and Process, 6th edn, St. Paul: West Academic.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2018). Brahmin Left vs, Merchant Right: Rising Inequality & the Changing Structure of Political Conflict (Evidence from France, Britain and the US, 1948–2017). WID.world WORKING PAPER SERIES N° 2018/7 (Accessed: 1 March 2020).Google Scholar
Pillay, A. (2019). The Constitution of the Republic of India. In Masterman, R., & Schütze, R., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincock, H. (2018). Can Democratic States Justify Restricting the Rights of Persons with Mental Illness? Presumption of Competence, Voting, and Voting Rights. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6 (1), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, S. (2009). 1688: The First Modern Revolution, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pinelli, C. (2011). The Populist Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. European Constitutional Law Review, 7 (1), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinnow, C. (2022). Monetary-Policy Delegation for Democrats. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Online Ahead of Print. DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2108228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, A. C. (2017). Corporatism and Fascism: The Corporatist Wave in Europe, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, K. (2013). A Legal Theory of Finance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41 (2), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (2004). Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27 (3), 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato. (1992). Statesman. Translated by J.B. Skemp. Edited by Ostwald, M.. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Plato. (1997). Gorgias. In Cooper, J. M. ed., Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing, pp. 791–869.Google Scholar
Plato. (2000). The Republic. Edited by Ferrari, G. R. F.. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pochet, Philippe (2019). À la recherche de l’Europe sociale, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1987). The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeeth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1995). The Ideal of Citizenship Since Classical Times. In Beiner, R., ed., Theorizing Citizenship. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T., & Webb, P., (2005) eds. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. (2003). Accommodation Rights for Hispanics in the U.S. In Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A., eds., Language Rights and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggi, G. (1990). The State. Its Nature, Development and Prospects, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (2001 [1944]). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, N. W. (1997). Political Opposition in the United States. Government and Opposition, 32 (4), 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T. (2003). Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (3), 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T. (2005). Questioning Common Law Constitutionalism. Legal Studies, 25 (1), 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T. (2010). Proportionality in Perspective. New Zealand Law Review, 2010 (2), 369–391.Google Scholar
Poole, T. (2015). Reason of State: Law, Prerogative and Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T. (2019). The Executive Power Project. Available from: www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2019/april/the-executive-power-projectGoogle Scholar
Poole, T. (2020). The Idea of the Federative. In Bomhoff, J., Dyzenhaus, D., & Poole, T., eds., The Double-Facing Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popova, M. (2012). Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, T. (2019). Donald Trump Is Not “Unwitting Agent” to Russia, “Knows Exactly What He Is Doing” Says House Intelligence Democrat. Newsweek, 16 January. Available at: www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-not-unwitting-agent-russia-knows-exactly-what-he-doing-says-1293373Google Scholar
Portes, A, & Hao, L. (2002). The Price of Uniformity: Language, Family, and Personality Adjustment in the Immigrant Second Generation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25 (6), 889–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. (1974). Theories of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Econmics and Management Science, 5 (2), 335–358.Google Scholar
Posner, R. (2003). Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. (2006). Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in Times of Emergency, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E., & Vermeule, A. (2002). Legislative Entrenchment: A Reappraisal. Yale Law Journal, 111 (7), 1165–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E., & Vermeule, A. (2005). Accommodating Emergencies. In Tushnet, M., ed., The Constitution in Wartime: Beyond Alarmism and Complacency, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 55–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E., & Vermeuele, A. (2010). The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Post, G. (1964). Studies in Medieval Legal Thought: Public Law and the State 1100–1322, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, R. (2023). The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930, Volume X of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, G. (2014). Fidelity in Law’s Commonwealth. In Austin, L., & Klimchuk, D., eds., The Rule of Law and Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
Postema, G. (2022). Law’s Rule: The Nature, Value, and Viability of the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pottage, A. (2012). The Materiality of What? Journal of Law and Society, 39 (1), 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, A. (1966). Great Britain: Opposition with a Capital “O”. In Dahl, R., ed., Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, B. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy. Majoritarian and Proportional Visions, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither Markets nor Hierarchies: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Oragnizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & di Maggio, P. J. (1992). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pozas-Loyo, A., & Rios-Figueroa, J. (2018). Anatomy of an Informal Institution: The “Gentlemen’s Pact” and Judicial Selection in Mexico, 1917–1994. International Political Science Review, 39 (5), 647–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozas-Loyo, A., & Rios-Figueroa, J. (2022). Instituciones informales e independencia judicial de facto. El eslabón olvidado en el camino hacia la eficacia institucional. Política y gobierno, 29 (2), 1–27.Google Scholar
Pozen, D. E. (2019). Hardball and/as Anti-Hardball. New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 21 (4), 949–955.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. B. (2020). The Living Presidency: An Originalist Argument against Its Ever-Expanding Powers, Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
President’s Committee on Administrative Management (PCAM). (1937). Administrative Management in the Government of the United States, Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Presidential executive order on restoring state, tribal, and local law enforcement’s access to life-saving equipment and resources. Federal Register 82, 168, Executive Order 13809 of August 28 (2017).Google Scholar
Preuss, U. K. (1994). Constitutional Powermaking for the New Polity: Some Deliberations on the Relations Between Constituent Power and the Constitution. In Rosenfeld, M., ed., Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference, and Legitimacy: Theoretical Perspectives. Duke University Press, pp. 143–164.Google Scholar
Prins, N. (2018). Collusion: How Central Bankers Rigged the World, New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2010). Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psygkas, A. (2017). From the “emocratic Deficit” to a “Democratic Surplus”: Constructing Administrative Democracy in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puetter, U. (2014). European Council and the Council, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pünder, H. (2014). Administrative Procedure – Mere Facilitator of Material Law versus Cooperative Realization of Common Welfare. In Pünder, H., & Waldhoff, C., eds., Debates in German Public Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 239–260.Google Scholar
Pünder, H. (2015). More Government with the People: The Crisis of Representative Democracy and Options for Reform in Germany. German Law Journal, 16, 713–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punnett, R. M. (1973). Front-Bench Opposition: The Role of the Leader of the Opposition, the Shadow Cabinet and the Shadow Government in British Politics, New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Quah, J. (2011). Curbing Corruption in Asian Countries; An Impossible Dream? Portland: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, S. L. (2019). American Bonds: How Credit Markets Shaped a Nation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quong, J. (2017). Public Reason. In E. Zalta, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/public-reason/Google Scholar
Qvortrup, M. (2006). Democracy by Delegation: The Decision to Hold Referendums in the United Kingdom. Representation 42 (1), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvortrup, M. (2014). Referendums and Ethnic Conflict, Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, B. (2011). Contested Federalism and American Climate Policy. The Journal of Federalism, 41 (3), 494–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabushka, A., & Shepsle, K. (1971). Political Entrepreneurship and Patterns of Democratic Instability in Plural Societies. Race and Class 12 (4), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, M. (1942). Martial Law and the State of Siege, California Law Review, 30 (6), 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, K. S. (2016). Democracy Against Domination, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, K., & Colbern, A. (2019). Progressive State Citizenship, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. M. (1994). The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach. Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (2), 721–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. M., & Rasmusen, E. B. (1997). Judicial Independence in a Civil Law Regime: The Evidence From Japan. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 13 (2), 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, N. (2008). On the Use and Abuse of Dignity in Constitutional Law. Columbia Journal of European Law, 14 (2), 201–255.Google Scholar
Raskin, J. B. (1993). Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical, Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141 (4), 1391–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathja, J. (2012). Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ratner, S. (2015). The Thin Justice of International Law: A Moral Reckoning of the Law of Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, R. (2008). Modelling Judicial Review. Current Legal Problems, 61 (1), 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999a). A Theory of Justice, rev. edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism, expanded edn, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1972). Legal Principles and the Limits of the Law. Yale Law Journal, 81 (5), 823–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (1979a). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (1979b). The Rule of Law and Its Virtue. In Raz, J. ed., The Authority of Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 210–229.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1992). The Relevance of Coherence. Boston University Law Review, 72 (2), 273–321.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1994). Rights and Individual Well-Being. In Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1998). On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries. In Alexander, L., ed., Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–193.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (2009). Intentions in Interpretation. In Raz, J. ed., Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (2015). Human Rights in the Emerging World Order. In Cruft, R., Liao, M., & Renzo, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (2019). The Law’s Own Virtue. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 39 (1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redslob, R. (1912). Staatstheories der französischen Nationalversammlung von 1789, Leipzig: von Veit.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, R. (2020). Collective Judging in the UK Supreme Court. In Häcker, B., & Ernst, W., eds., Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfeld, A. (2005). The Concept of Constituency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehnquist, W. H. (1976). The Notion of a Living Constitution. Texas Law Review, 54 (4), 693–706.Google Scholar
Reilly, B. (2001). Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, B. (2012). Institutional Designs for Diverse Democracies: Consociationalism, Centripetalism and Communalism Compared. European Political Science, 11 (2), 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, B. (2020). Cross-ethnic Voting: An Index of Centripetal Electoral Systems. Government and Opposition. First view. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitz, J. C. (2006). Political Economy and Separation of Powers. Transnational Law & Contempory Problems, 15 (2), 579–625.Google Scholar
Renan, E. (2018). What Is a Nation? and Other Political Writings, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renda, A. (2011). Law and Economics in the RIA World: Improving the Use of Economic Analysis in Public Policy and Legislation, Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Renwick, A., Palese, M., & Sargeant, J. (2020). Information in Referendum Campaigns: How Can It Be Improved? Representation, 56 (4), 521–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, J. (2005). Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure. Cardozo Law Review, 26 (2), 579–658.Google Scholar
Reuchamps, M., & Suiter, J. eds. (2016). Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Revkin, A. C. (2012). Beyond Rio: Pursuing “Ecological Citizenship.” The New York Times. 25 June.Google Scholar
Rhode, D. (1991). Justice and Gender: Sex Discrimination and the Law, revised edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, C. (2013). Defending the Objective List Theory of Well-Being. Ratio, 26 (2), 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs 5 (4), 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, H. S. (2002). Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricks, M. (2016). The Money Problem: Rethinking Financial Regulation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice, San Francisco: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Rios-Figueroa, J., 2006. Judicial Independence and Corruption: An Analysis of Latin America. SSRN. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=912924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, R. B. (1967). Party Leaders in the House of Representatives, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Ripple, W. J. et al. (2020). World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency. BioScience, 70 (1), 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, A., (2016). Reclaiming Proportionality. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22 (2), 24–31.Google Scholar
Ritter, J. (1984). Hegel and the French Revolution: Essays on The Philosophy of Right. Translated by Richard Dien Winfield. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. (2020). Should We Defend the Administrative State? Public Administration Review, 80 (3), 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. C., & Chemerinsky, E. (2003). Entrenchment of Ordinary Legislation: A Reply to Professors Posner and Vermeule. California Law Review 91 (6), 1773–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T. M. (2009). Distant Revolutions: 1848 and the Challenge to American Exceptionalism, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2010). The Judge as Political Theorist. Contemporary Constitutional Review, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. (2018). The Counter-Majoritan Thesis. In Jacobson, G., & Schor, M., eds., Comparative Constitutional Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (2014). Social and Legal Aspects of Climate Change. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 5, 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, D. T. (1998). Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Agency, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, D. T. (2000). Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy, New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, C. A., & Arenas, L. (2005). Indigenous Rights, Transnational Activism, and Legal Mobilization: The Struggle of the U’wa People in Colombia. In de Sousa Santos, B., & Rodríguez-Garavito, C. A., eds., Law and Globalization from Below. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolfe, J. (2010). Combating Climate Change with Words: The Effect of Incorporating “Climate Change” into Development-Regulating Laws. Queensland Environmental Practice Reporter 15, (70), 164–179.Google Scholar
Romain, P. (1918). L’état de siège politique, Albi: Librairie des Orphelins-Apprentis.Google Scholar
Ronkainen, A., & Sorsa, V.-P. (2018). Quantitative Easing Forever? Financialisation and the Institutional Legitimacy of the Federal Reserve’s Unconventional Monetary Policy. New Political Economy, 23 (6), 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, H. (1989). Tying the King’s Hands. Rationality and Society, 1 (2), 240–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (2012). The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy. In Rorty, R., ed., Objectivism, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2006). La contre-démocratie. La politique à l’âge de la défiance, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2011a). Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Translated by A. Goldhammer. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2011b). Penser le populisme. La vie des idees, January 27. Available from: www.laviedesidees.fr/Penser-le-populisme.html.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2018). Good Government. Translated by A. Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R., (1984). Do Parties Make a Difference? 2nd edn, London: The Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1992). Rethinking the Progressive Agenda: The Reform of the American Regulatory State, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1995). Controlling Environmental Policy; the Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2017). Citizens and Technocrats: An Essay on Trust, Public Participation, and Government Legitimacy. In Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P., & Emerson, B., eds., Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2021). Democracy and Executive Power: Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, France, and Germany, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Egidy, S., & Fowkes, J. (2015). Due Process of Lawmaking: The United States, South Africa, Germany, and the European Union, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Perroud, T. (2014). Policymaking and Public Law in France: Public Participation, Agency Independence, and Impact Assessment. The Columbia Journal of European Law, 19 (2), 225–312.Google Scholar
Rosemont, H. (2004). Whose Democracy? Which Rights? A Confucian Critique of Modern Western Liberalism. In Shung, K.-L., & Wong, D., eds., Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. pp. 49–71.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (2012). Dignity: Its History and Meaning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (2004). On the Priority of Intellectual Property Rights, Especially in Biotechnology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 3 (1), 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, N. (2008). On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N. (2022). The Anti-fascist Roots of Presidential Administration. Columbia Law Review, 122 (1), 1–85.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, F. M., & Shapiro, I. (2018). Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenne, S. (1966). Is the Constitution of an International Organization an International Treaty? – Reflections on the Codification of the Law of Treaties. Comunicazioni e studi, 12 (1), 21–89.Google Scholar
Ross, A. (2018). Post-Revolutionary Politics: The Case of the Prussian Ministry of State. In Moggach, D., & Stedman Jones, G., eds., The 1848 Revolutions and European Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 276–292.Google Scholar
Ross, B. L. (2019). Administrative Constitutionalism as Popular Constitutionalism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 167 (7), 1783–1823.Google Scholar
Rossiter, C. (1982). Conservatism in America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rossiter, C. (2002 [1948]). Constitutional Dictatorship: Crisis Government in the Modern Democracies, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Roszkowski, T., & Goldsworthy, J. (2012). Symmetric Entrenchment of Manner and Form Requirements. Public Law Review 23 (3), 216–222.Google Scholar
Roth, B. (2011). Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement: Premises of a Pluralist International Legal Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, K. (2001). The Case for Universal Jurisdiction. Foreign Affairs, 80 (5), 150–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. (2004). Social Trust and Honesty in Government: A Causal Mechanism Approach. In: Kornai, J., Rothstein, B., & Rose-Ackerman, S., eds., Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Societies. New York: Palgrave, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
Rothstein, R. (2017). The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America, W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Roubier, P. (1929). Les conflicts de lois dans le temps – Théorie dite de la non-rétroactivité des lois, vol. I, 2nd edn, Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Roughan, N. (2018). The Official Point of View and the Official Claim to Authority. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38 (2), 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D., Gahdoun, P.-Y., & Bonnet, J. (2016). Droit du contentieux constitutionnel, 11th edn, Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1973). The Social Contract. Translated by G. D. H. Cole. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1987). The Social Contract. In Cress, D. A. ed., Basic Political Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1997 [1762]). The Social Contract. In Gourevitch, V. ed., The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (2003 [1762]). On the Social Contract. Translated by G.D.H. Cole. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (2004). Letter to Mirabeau. In Rousseau, J. J. ed., The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 268–271.Google Scholar
Roux, T. (2015). In Defence of Empirical Entanglement: The Methodological Flaw in Waldron’s Case against Judicial Review, University of New South Wales Working Paper No. 2015–73.Google Scholar
Roy, S. (2011). Hamas and Civil Society in Gaza: Engaging the Islamist Social Sector, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roznai, Y. (2017). Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, J. (1998). The Moment and the Millennium. George Washington Law Journal, 66 (5/6), 1085–1111.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, K. (1995). Citizenship in Australia: Unscrambling Its Meaning. Melbourne University Law Review, 20 (2), 503–527.Google Scholar
Rubin, E. (2005). Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinelli, L. (2018). Taming Sovereignty: Constituent Power in Nineteenth Century French Political Thought. History of European Ideas, 44 (1), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinelli, L. (2019a). Constantion Mortati and the Idea of Material Constitution. History of Political Thought, 40 (3), 515–547.Google Scholar
Rubinelli, L. (2019b). How to Think Beyond Sovereignty: One Sieyès and Constituent Power. European Journal of Political Theory, 18 (1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinelli, L. (2020). Constituent Power: A History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, J. B. (2021). Why Do We Think That Inflation Expectations Matter for Inflation? (And Should We?). In Finance and Economics Discussion Series (No. 2021–062). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufus Davis, S. (1956). The “Federal Principle” Reconsidered, Part 2. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 1 (2), 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization, 36 (2), 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. (1998). Globalisation and the Embedded Liberalism Compromise, The End of an Era? In Streeck, W., ed., Internationale Wirtschaft, nationale Demokratie: Herausforderungen für die Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt-am-Main: Campus, pp. 79–97.Google Scholar
Runciman, D. (1997). Pluralism and the Personality of the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, K. (2012). Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller, Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Russell, M., & Gover, D. (2017). Legislation at Westminster, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. H. (2001). Toward a General Theory of Judicial Independence. In Russell, P. H., & O’Brien, D. M., eds., Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Russell, P. H. (2015). Codifying Conventions. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. (1982). John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Ryan-Collins, J. (2017). Breaking the Taboo: A History of Monetary Financing in Canada, 1930–1975: Monetary Financing. The British Journal of Sociology, 68 (4), 643–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sábato, H. (2010). Pueblo y política. La construcción de la Argentina moderna, Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.Google Scholar
Sábato, H., & Lettieri, A. (2003). La vida política en la Argentina del siglo XIX. Armas, votos y voces, Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F., & Simon, W. H. (2017). Democratic Experimentalism. In Desautels-Stein, J., & Tomlins, C., eds., Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14 (3), 271–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabl, A. (2002). Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sadurski, W. (2019). Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W. (2020). Majority Rule, Democracy, and Populism: Theoretical Considerations. Sydney Law School Research Paper 20/01.Google Scholar
Sajó, A. (1999). Limiting Government: An Introduction to Constitutionalism, Budapest: Central European Press.Google Scholar
Sajó, A. (2021). Ruling by Cheating: Governance in Illiberal Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajó, A., & Uitz, R. (2017). The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampford, C. J. G. (1987). “Recognize and Declare”: An Australian Experiment in Codifying Constitutional Conventions. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7 (3), 369–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sample, I. (2010). Deep-Sea Trawling Is Destroying Coral Reefs and Pristine Marine Habitats. The Guardian. February 18. Available from: www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/feb/18/deep-sea-trawling-coral-reefs.Google Scholar
Samuels, D., & Shugart, M. (2010). Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers – How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Sibony, O. (2018). Competitive Authoritarianism in Ecuador under Correa. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 14 (2), 97–120.Google Scholar
Sandalow, T. (1969). Review of Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience, by A. Fortas. Michigan Law Review, 67 (3), 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, M. (1996). Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1998). Religious Liberty: Freedom of Choice or Freedom of Conscience? In Bhargava, R., ed., Secularism and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Santiago Nino, C. (1996). The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, A., Douglas, L., & Umphrey, M., eds. (2005). The Limits of Law, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1962). Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion. American Political Science Review, 56 (4). 853–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. (1997). Comparative Constitutional Engineering, 2nd edn, New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, S. (2002). Towards Post-national and Denationalized Citizenship. In Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S., eds. Handbook of Citizenship Studies. London: Sage. pp. 279–280.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (2017). Constitutional Review in Asia: A Comparative Perspective. In Chen, A. H. Y., & Harding, A., eds., Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–59.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (2018). Theoretical Underpinnings of Separation of Powers. In Jacobson, G., & Schor, M., eds., Comparative Constitutional Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 66–85.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (2019). Global Constitutionalism – Myth and Reality. In Varuhas, J., & Stark, S., eds., The Frontiers of Public Law. Oxford: Hart, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayigh, R. (2007). The Palestinians: From Peasants to Revolutionaries, 2nd edn, London & New York: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbragia, A. (2008). Comparative Regionalism: What Might It Be? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, A (1997). A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scalia, A., & Garner, B. (2012). Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts, St Paul: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1972). A Theory of Freedom of Expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1 (2), 204–226.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (2003). The Difficult of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, O. (1983). Human Dignity as a Normative Concept. American Journal of International Law, 77 (4), 848–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective or Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (2010). The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot be a Social Market Economy. Socio-Economic Review, 8 (2), 211–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1988). The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America, South Melbourne, Victoria: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (2009). Party Government. Introduction by Sidney A. Pearsons. Jr. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2006). Legislatures as Rule-Followers. In Bauman, R., & Kahana, T., eds., The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 468–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, F. (2009–10). When and How (If At All) Does Law Constrain Official Action? Georgia Law Review, 44 (3), 769–801.Google Scholar
Scheingold, S. (2004). The Politics of Rights, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheppele, K. L. (2000). The Constitutional Basis of Hungarian Conservatism. East European Constitutional Review, 9 (4), 51–57.Google Scholar
Scheppele, K. L. (2008). Legal and Extralegal Emergencies, In Whittington, K. E., Kelemen, R. D., & Caldeira, G. A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 164–188.Google Scholar
Scheppele, K. L. (2018). Autocratic Legalism. University of Chicago Law Review, 85 (2), 545–583.Google Scholar
Scheppele, K. L. (2019). The Opportunism of Populists and the Defense of Constitutional Liberalism. German Law Journal, 20 (3), 314–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schermers, H., & Blokker, N. (2018). International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (1994). Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (2005). American Kingship? Monarchical Origins of Modern Presidentialism. Polity, 37 (1), 24–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (2006). Survey Article: Emergency Powers and the Rule of Law After 9/11. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14 (1), 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schielke, S. (2015). Egypt in the Future Tense: Hope, Frustration, and Ambivalence before and after 2011, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, R. E. (2007). The Era of Deference: Courts, Expertise, and the Emergence of New Deal Administrative Law. Michigan Law Review, 106 (3), 399–442.Google Scholar
Schirazi, A. (1997). The Constitution of Iran: Politics and the State in the Islamic Republic. Translated by John O’Kane. I.B. London: Tauris Publishers.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2018). Unequal and Unrepresented: Political Inequality in the New Gilded Age, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K. L., Page, B., Verba, S., & Fiorina, M. (2005). Inequality of Political Voice. In Jacobs, L. R., & Skocpol, T., eds., Inequality and American Democracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 19–87.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S., & Kelemen, D. (2013). The Power of the European Court of Justice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Aßmann, E. (1991). Verwaltungslegitimation als Rechtsbegriff. Archiv des öffentliches Rechts, 116 (3), 329–390.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Assmann, E. (2004). Der Rechtsstaat. In Isensee, J., & Kirchhof, P., eds, Handbuch des Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. CF Müller 2004.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1958 [1941]). Staat als ein konkreter, an eine geschichtliche Epoche gebundener Begriff. In Schmitt, C. ed., Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954. Materialien zu einer Verfassungslehre, 4th edn, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 375–385.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1963 [1932]). Der Begriff des Politischen. Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien, 2nd edn, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1985 [1922]). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by G Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1985 [1926]). The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated by E. Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1991 [1919]). Political Romanticism. Translated by G. Oakes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1996 [1932]). The Concept of the Political. Translated by G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2004 [1932]). Legality and Legitimacy. Translated by J. Seitzer., ed. Durham, , Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2005 [1922]). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by G Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2008 [1928]). Constitutional Theory. Translated by J. Seitzer. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2014 [1921]). Dictatorship: From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggle. Translated by M. Hoelzl and G. Ward. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2015). The Guardian of the Constitution. In Vinx, L. ed., The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–173.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1974). Still the Century of Corporatism? Review of Politics, 36 (1), 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, J. (2007). Regulation and Europeanisation as Key Patterns of Change in Administrative Law. In Ruffert, M., ed., The Transformation of Administrative Law in Europe. Munich: Sellier, pp. 309–323.Google Scholar
Schönberger, C. (1999). Der “Staat” der Allgemeinen Staatslehre: Anmerkungen zu einer eigenwilligen deutschen Disziplin im Vergleich mit Frankreich. In Beaud, O., & Heyen, E. V., eds., Eine deutsch-französische Rechtswissenschaft? Une science juridique franco-allemande? Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 111–137.Google Scholar
Schönberger, C. (2011). Vorrang der Verfassung. In: Appel, I., Hermes, G., & Schönberger, C., eds., Öffentliches Recht im offenen Staat. Festschrift für Rainer Wahl zum 70. Geburtstag. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 385–403.Google Scholar
Schreurs, M. A. (2008). From the Bottom Up: Local and Subnational Climate Change Politics. The Journal of Environment and Development, 17 (4), 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, P. (1998). Citizens, Strangers, and In-Betweens: Essays on Immigration and Citizenship, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1984). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Schütze, R. (2009). From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. (2020). Criminalizing A Constitutional Right. New York Review of Books, December 3. Available from: www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/12/03/criminalizing-abortion-constitutional-right/.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, M. (2007). Democracy and Legal Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, M. (2013). Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of the Supermajority Rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, M. (2018). Justifying the Jury: Reconciling Justice, Equality and Democracy. American Political Science Review, 112 (3), 446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, M. (2012). What if Religion Is Not Special? University of Chicago Law Review 79 (4), 1351–1427.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, L., & Tavits, M. (2016). Clarity of Responsibility, Accountability, and Corruption, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C. (2001). Analysing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design. Public Law, 283–305.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, K. (2011). Federalism: A Normative Theory and its Practical Relevance, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks; London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sea Shepherd. (2018). Sea Shepherd’s Statement on Japan’s Decision to Commercially Slaughter Whales, 26 December. Available from: https://seashepherd.org/2018/12/26/sea-shepherd-welcomes-the-end-of-whaling-in-the-southern-ocean/ (Accessed: 3 October 2019).Google Scholar
Segal, J, & Cover, A. (1989). Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. American Political Science Review, 83 (2), 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidman, L. M. (2013). On Constitutional Disobedience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selgin, G. A. (1988). The Theory of Free Banking: Money Supply under Competitive Note Issue, New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Selinger, W. (2019). Parliamentarism: From Burke to Weber, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sempill, J. (2017). The Lions and the Greatest Part: The Rule of Law and the Constitution of Employer Power. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 9 (2), 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sempill, J. (2018a). Ruler’s Sword, Citizen’s Shield: The Rule of Law and the Constitution of Power. Journal of Law & Politics, 31 (3), 333–415.Google Scholar
Sempill, J. (2018b). What Rendered Ancient Tyrants Detestable: The Rule of Law and the Constitution of Corporate Power. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 10 (2), 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and Well-Being. In Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A., eds., The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Senellart, M. (1989). Machiavellisme et raison d’État, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Sengupta, A. (2019). Independence and Accountability of the Indian Higher Judiciary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serres, M., & Polacco, M. (2018). Défense et illustration de la langue française aujourd’hui, Paris: Le Pommier.Google Scholar
Setzer, J., & Vanhala, L. (2019). Climate Change Litigation: A Review of Research on Courts and Litigants in Climate Governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10 (3), e580.Google Scholar
Sewell, Jr, W. H. (1994). A Rhetoric of Bourgeois Revolution: The Abbé Sieyès and What Is the Third Estate? Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, W. H. (1996). Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille. Theory and Society, 25 (6), 841–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaafqat, S. (2018). Civil Society and the Lawyers’ Movement of Pakistan. Law and Social Inquiry, 43 (3), 889–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, A. (2006). The Race for Talent: Highly Skilled Migrants and Competitive Immigration Regimes. NYU Law Review, 81 (1), 148–206.Google Scholar
Shachar, A. (2009). The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shachar, A. (2017). Citizenship for Sale? In Shachar, A. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 789–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, A., & Hirschl, R. (2014). On Citizenship, States, and Markets. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22 (2), 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G. (2009). Developing Country Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Why It Matters, the Barriers Posed. In Hartigan, J., ed., Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Volume 6 of Frontiers of Economics and Globalization. Leeds, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, R. (2021). Top upper caste judges in India “biased” against Dalit colleagues: US Bar Association report. Available from: https://theleaflet.in/top-upper-caste-judges-in-india-biased-towards-dalit-colleagues-us-bar-association-report/Google Scholar
Shakman Hurd, E. (2015). Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Shane, P. M. (2009). Madison’s Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy, Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, I. (1994). The Rule of Law: NOMOS XXXVI, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. (2016). Politics against Domination, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, M. (2010). A Comparison of US and European Independent Agencies. In Rose-Ackerman, S., & Lindseth, P., eds., Comparative Administrative Law, Research Handbooks in Comparative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 293–308.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. (2019). Judicial Power and Democracy. In Landfried, C., ed., Judicial Power. How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharlet, R. (1993). The Russian Constitutional Court: The First Term. Post-Soviet Affairs, 9 (1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, C. (2015). Upper Houses. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C. K. (1992). Hegel’s Theory of Modern Bureaucracy, American Political Science Review, 86 (2), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. (2020). The People in Question: Citizens and Constitutions in Uncertain Times, Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. (1991). Discretion, Institutions and the Problem of Government Commitment. In Bourdieu, P., & Coleman, J., ed., Social Theory for a Changing Society. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. (1992). Congress Is a “They,” Not an “It”: Legislative Intent as an Oxymoron. International Review of Law & Economics, 12 (2), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, J. E. (1975). China in Disintegration: The Republican Era in Chinese History, 1912–1949, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shetreet, S. (2011). Judicial Independence and Accountability: Core Values in Liberal Democracies. In Lee, H., ed. Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, S. (2021). Democratic Law. Edited by Ginsborg, H.. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shihata, I. (2000). The Dynamic Evolution of International Organizations: The Case of the World Bank. Journal of the History of International Law, 2 (2), 217–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, J. (1987). Political Theory and the Rule of Law. In Hutchinson, A., & Monahan, P., eds., The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology? Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
Shklar, J. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. In Rosenblum, N., ed., Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shonfield, A. (1965). Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shu, M. (2008). Referendums and the Political Constitution of the EU. European Law Journal 14 (4), 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, M. S., & Wattenberg, M. P. (2001). Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. The Best of Both Worlds? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shugerman, J. (2002–2003). A Six-Three Rule: Reviving Consensus and Deference on the Supreme Court. Georgia Law Review 37 (3), 893–1020.Google Scholar
Sieder, R. (2016). Legal Pluralism and Indigenous Women’s Rights in Mexico: The Ambiguities of Recognition. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 48 (4), 1125–1150.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. (1997). Why Equal Protection No Longer Protects: The Evolving Forms of Status-Enhancing State Action. Stanford Law Review, 49 (5), 1111–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siep, L. (2017). Hegel’s Liberal, Social, and “Ethical” State. In Moyar, D., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 515–534.Google Scholar
Siéyès, E.-J. (1795). Opinion sur les attributions et l’organisation du jury constitutionnaire, Paris.Google Scholar
Sieyès, E.-J. (2003 [1789]). What Is the Third Estate? In Political Writings. Translated by M. Sonenscher. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 92–162.Google Scholar
Sieyès, E.-J. (2014 [1789]). What Is the Third Estate? In Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès: The Essential Political Writings. Edited by Lembcke, O. W. and Weber, F.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sillen, J. (2019). The Concept of “Internal Judicial Independence” in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. European Constitutional Law Review, 15 (1), 104–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, G. (2008). Singapore: The Exception That Proves Rules Matter. In Ginsburg, T. and Moustafa, T., eds. Rule of Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J. (1992). The Lockean Theory of Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B. (2002). Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Institutions and Territorial Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (6), 829–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B. (2012). Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, D. (1981). L’interprétation judiciaire des traités d’organisations internationales, Paris: Editions A. Pedone.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. M. (2013). Intellectual Agency and Responsibility for Belief in Free-Speech Theory. Legal Theory, 19 (3), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, G. F. (2017). To Reform the World: International Organizations and the Making of Modern States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinden, A. (2019). A Human Rights Framework for the Anthropocene. In Jaria-Manzano, J., & Borras, S., eds., Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 132–152.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1991). Disobedience as a Plea for Reconsideration. In Bedau, H. A., ed., Civil Disobedience in Focus. London: Routledge, pp. 122–129.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Y. (2013). The Meanings of Political Representation: Uses and Misuses of a Notion. Raisons Politiques, 50 (2), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šipulová, K. (2021). Under Pressure: Building Judicial Resistance to Political Inference. In Galligan, D. J., ed., The Courts and the People: Friend or Foe? The Putney Debates 2019. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar
Šipulová, K. et al. (2023). Judicial Self-Governance Index: Towards better understanding of the role of judges in governing the judiciary. Regulation & Governance, 17(1), pp. 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1965). History and Ideology in the English Revolution. The Historical Journal, 8 (2), 151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Volume 2: The Age of Reformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1989). The State. In Ball, T., Farr, J., & Hanson, R. L., eds., Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–131.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2002). Hobbes and Civil Science. Volume III of Visions of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2009). A Genealogy of the Modern State, Proceedings of the British Academy, 162, pp. 325–370.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, S. (1997). The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, S., Dearborn, J. A., & King, D. (2021). Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., Stone Sweet, A., & Weiler, J., eds (1998). The ECJ and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Sloan, B. (1989). The United Nations Charter as a Constitution. Pace International Law Review 1 (1), 61–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smend, R. (1955 [1923]). Die politische Gewalt im Verfassungsstaat. In Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht, Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen, 2nd edn, Berlin: Dunkner & Humbolt, pp. 69–88.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1976 [1776]). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by Cannan, E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1985[1762–63]). Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Edited by Bryce, J. C.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1981 [1776]). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A., & Todd, W.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, D. E. (2013). Across the Aisle: Opposition in Canadian Politics, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. (2016). Equity and Administrative Behaviour. In Turner, P. G., ed., Equity and Administration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 326–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G., & Setälä, M. (2019). Mini-Publics and Deliberative Democracy. In Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 300–314.Google Scholar
Smith, M. N. (2008). Rethinking Sovereignty, Rethinking Revolution. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36 (4), 405–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (1997). Civic Ideals: Conficting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2018). New South Wales: An Accidental Case of Semi-Parliamentarism? Australian Journal of Political Science, 53 (2), 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. (2013). Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoleńska, A., & van ’t Klooster, J. (2022). A Risky Bet: Climate Change and the EU’s Microprudential Framework for Banks. Journal of Financial Regulation, 8 (1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokol, M., & Pataccini, L. (2021). Financialisation, regional economic development and the coronavirus crisis: A time for spatial monetary policy? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, rsab033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, F. (2008). Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52 (1), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, L. B. (2008). Semantic Originalism. Illinois Public Law Research Paper, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, A. (2003). Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Austrian Constitutional Doctrine 1933 to 1938 and Its Legacy. In Joerges, C., & Singh Ghaleigh, N., eds., Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Somek, A. (2006). Stateless Law: Kelsen’s Conception and Its Limits. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (4), 753–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somin, I. (2014). Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Sommermann, K.-P. (1997). Staatsziele und Staatszielbestimmungen, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Song, S. (2017). Why Does the State Have the Right to Control Immigration? In Knight, J., ed., NOMOS LVII: Migration, Emigration, and Immigration. New York: New York University Press, pp. 3–50.Google Scholar
Song, S. (2018). Immigration and the Limits of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sordi, B. (2017). Révolution, Rechtsstaat, and the Rule of Law: Historical Reflections on the Emergence of Administrative Law. In Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P., & Emerson, B., eds., Comparative Administrative Law, 2nd edn. Cheltenham, UK; Edward Elgar, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. (1983). Autonomous Legal Orders: Some Considerations Relating to a Systems Analysis of International Organisations in the World Legal Order. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 32 (3), 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sossin, L. (2003). Public Fiduciary Obligations, Political Trusts, and the Equitable Duty of Reasonableness in Administrative Law. Saskatchewan Law Review, 66 (1), 129–182.Google Scholar
Sossin, L. (2004). The Quasi-Revival of the Canadian Bill of Rights and Its Implications for Administrative Law. Supreme Court Law Review, 2nd series, 25, 191–212.Google Scholar
Souter, J. (2014). Towards a Theory of Asylum as Reparation for Past Injustice. Political Studies, 62 (2), 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Y. (2012). Postnational Citizenship: Rights and Obligations of Individuality. In Nash, K., & Scott, A., eds., The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell. pp. 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spáč, S. (2018). Recruiting European Judges in the Age of Judicial Self-Government. German Law Journal, 19 (7), 2077–2104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spáč, S. (2022). The Illusion of Merit-Based Judicial Selection in Post-Communist Judiciary: Evidence from Slovakia. Problems of Post-Communism, 69 (6), 528–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, H. (2009). The Right to a Constitutional Jury. Legisprudence, 3 (1), 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, M. (2002). Hume and Madison on Faction. The William and Mary Quarterly, 59 (4), 869–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, S. (2021). Climate Injustice, Criminalisation of Land Protection and Anti-colonial Solidarity: Courtroom Ethnography in an Age of Fossil Fuel Violence. Political Geography, 84. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629820303619?via%3DihubGoogle Scholar
Spieler, M. F. (2009). The Legal Structure of Colonial Rule during the French Revolution. William and Mary Quarterly, 66 (2), 365–408.Google Scholar
Spinelli, A., & Rossi, E. (1941). The Manifesto of Ventotene for a Free and United Europe. Available from: www.ena.lu/manifesto-ventotene-1941-020000007.html.Google Scholar
Spinner-Halev, J. (2005). Hinduism, Christianity and Liberal Religious Toleration. Political Theory, 33 (1), 28–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, P. (2013). The (Dwindling) Rights and Obligations of Citizenship. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 21 (3), 899–923.Google Scholar
Spiro, P. (2016). At Home in Two Countries: The Past and Future of Dual Citizenship, New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, G. (2005). A Hybrid Theory of Claim-Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25 (2). 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, J. (2018). The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Stacey, J. (2022). The Public Law Paradoxes of Climate Emergency Declarations. Transnational Environmental Law, 11 (2), 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staughton, L. (1967). Class Conflict, Slavery, and the United States Constitution: Ten Essays, Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merill Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Stears, M. (2002). Progressives, Pluralists, and the Problems of the State: Ideologies of Reform in the United States and Britain, 1909–1926, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, E. (1981). Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution. American Journal of International Law, 75 (1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, R. (1994). Untergesetzliche Regelwerke und Gremien. In Steinberg, R., ed., Reform des Atomrechts. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 82–100.Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (2002). In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization 56 (2), 339–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, H. (1992). Libertarianism and the Transnational Migration of People. In Barry, B., & Goodin, R. E., eds., Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 87–94.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10 (4), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, T. (2019). What Is the Point of International Environmental Law Scholarship in the Anthropocene? In Pedersen, Ole W., ed., Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
Stephenson, M. (2003). “When the Devil Turns…”: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review. Journal of Legal Studies, 32 (1), 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, M. (2006). A Costly Signaling Theory of Hard Look Judicial Review. Administrative Law Review, 58 (4), 753–814.Google Scholar
Stephenson, S. (2021). Constitutional Conventions and the Judiciary. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41 (3), 750–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steurer, R., Clar, C., & Casado-Asensio, J. (2020). Climate Change Mitigation in Austria and Switzerland: The Pitfalls of Federalism in Greening Decentralized Building Policies. Natural Resources Forum, 44 (1), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevin, S. (1955 [1586]). General Introduction Mechanics. Vol. I of The Principal Works of Simon Stevin. Edited by Dijksterhuis, E. J.. Amsterdam: C.V. Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. (1975). The Reformation of Administrative Law. Harvard Law Review, 88 (8), 1667–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R. B. (1977). Pyramids of Sacrifice? Problems of Federalism in Mandating State Implementation of National Environmental Policy. The Yale Law Journal, 86 (6), 1196–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, S. G. W. (2014). When Democracy Meets Pluralism: Landemore’s Epistemic Argument for Democracy and the Problem of Value Diversity. Critical Review, 26 (1–2), 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2 (1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (2019). The Climate Crisis Is Our Third World War. It Needs a Bold Response. The Guardian. 4 June.Google Scholar
Stilz, A. (2013). Occupancy Rights and the Wrong of Removal, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41 (4), 324–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilz, A. (2015). Language, Dignity, and Territory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18 (2), 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolleis, M. (1992). Staatsrechtslehre und Verwaltungswissenschaft 1800–1914. Vol. II of Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Stone, B. (2008). State Legislative Councils: Designing for Accountability. In Aroney, N., Prasser, S., & Nethercote, J., eds., Restraining Elective Dictatorship: The Upper House Solution? Perth: University of West Australia Press, 175–195.Google Scholar
Stojanović, N. (2006). Do Multicultural Democracies Really Require PR? Counterevidence from Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 12 (4), 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanović, N. (2011). Limits of Consociationalism and Possible Alternatives. Centripetal Effects of Direct Democracy in a Multiethnic Society. Transitions 51 (1–2), 99–114.Google Scholar
Stojanović, N. (2016). Party, Regional and Linguistic Proportionality Under Majoritarian Rules: Swiss Federal Council Elections. Swiss Political Science Review, 22 (1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanović, N. (2020). Democracy, Ethnoicracy and Consociational Demoicracy. International Political Science Review, 41 (1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolleis, M. (2001). Konstitution und Intervention. Studien zur Geschichte des oeffentliches Rechts im 19. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stolleis, M. (2004). A History of Public Law in Germany, 1914–1945. Translated by M. Dunlap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. (2004). The Judicial Construction of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., & Mathews, J. (2019). Proportionality Balancing and Constitutional Governance: A Comparative and Global Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., & Shapiro, M. (2002). Abstract and Concrete Review in the United States. In Shapiro, M., & Stone Sweet, A. eds., On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, D. (1999). What Is Constitutional Theory. California Law Review, 87 (3), 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, D. (2011). Do We Have a Living Constitution? Drake Law Review, 59 (4), 973–984.Google Scholar
Strauss, P. L. (2007). Overseer or “the Decider”? The President in Administrative Law. George Washington Law Review, 75 (4), 696–760.Google Scholar
Strauss, P. L. (2013–2014). Private Standards Organizations and Public Law. William & Mary Bill of Rights Law Journal, 22 (2), 497–562.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2015). German Hegemony: Unintended and Unwanted. 15 May. Available from: https://wolfgangstreeck.com/2015/05/15/german-hegemony-unintended-and-unwanted/.Google Scholar
Strøm, K., Müller, W., & Bergman, T., eds. (2003). Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, P., & Lendvai‐Bainton, N. (2020). Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Radical Conservatism and Social Policy within the European Union: Croatia, Hungary and Poland. Development and Change, 51 (2), 540–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stykow, P. (2019). The Devil in the Details: Constitutional Regime Types in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 35 (2), 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suiter, J., Farrell, D., & Harris, C. (2016). The Irish Constitutional Convention: A Case of “High Legitimacy”? In Reuchamps, M., & Suiter, J., eds., Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 33–54.Google Scholar
Suiter, J., & Reidy, T. (2020). Does Deliberation Help Deliver Informed Electorates: Evidence from Irish Referendum Votes. Representation, 56 (4), 539–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, E., & Courty, G. (1997). L’Âge d’Or de l’État: Une métamorphose annoncée, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Sullivan, T., & Frase, F. (2008). Proportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government Actions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, W. F. (2005). The Impossibility of Religious Freedom, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, W. F., Shakman Hurd, E., Mahmood, S., & Danchin, P. G., eds., (2015). The Politics of Religious Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sultany, N. (2012). The State of Progressive Constitutional Theory: The Paradox of Constitutional Democracy and the Project of Political Justification. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 47 (2), 371–455.Google Scholar
Sultany, N. (2017a). Law and Revolution: Legitimacy and Constitutionalism After the Arab Spring, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sultany, N. (2017b). The Legal Structures of Subordination: The Palestinian Minority and Israeli Law. In Rouhana, N. N., & Huneidi, S. N., eds., Ethnic Privileges in the Jewish State: Israel and its Palestinian Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sultany, N. (2019). What Good Is Abstraction? From Liberal Legitimacy to Social Justice. Buffalo Law Review, 67 (3), 823–887.Google Scholar
Sultany, N. (2021). Marx and Critical Constitutional Theory. In O’Connell, P., & Özsu, U., eds., Research Handbook on Law and Marxism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 209–241.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1990). After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1991). Constitutionalism and Secession. University of Chicago Law Review 58 (2), 633–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1993a). Against Positive Rights. East European Constitutional Review, 2 (1), 35–38.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1993b). Democracy and Shifting Preferences. In Copp, D., Hampton, J., & Roemer, J., eds., The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 196–230.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1993c). The Anticaste Principle. Michigan Law Review, 92 (8), 2410–2455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1993d). The Partial Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (1996). On the Expressive Function of Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144 (5), 2021–2054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2000/2001). Social and Economic Rights? Lessons from South Africa. Constitutional Forum, 11 (4), 123–132.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2001). Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2009). A Constitution of Many Minds, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2017). Cost-Benefit Analysis and Arbitrariness Review. Harvard Environmental Law Review 41 (1), 1–41.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. ed. (2018a). Can it happen here? Authoritarianism in America, New York: Dey Street/Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2020). Falsehoods and the First Amendment. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 33 (2), 387–426.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., & Barnett, R. (2005). Constitutive Commitments and Roosevelt’s Second Bill of Rights: A Dialogue. Drake Law Review, 53 (2), 205–230.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., & Vermeule, A. (2017). The Morality of Administrative Law. Harvard Law Review, 131 (7), 1924–1978.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., & Vermeule, A. (2020). Law and Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Suteu, S. (2015). Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era: Lessons from Iceland and Ireland. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 38 (2), 251–276.Google Scholar
Suteu, S. (2019). Recourse to the People in Semi-presidential Systems: Lessons from Romanian Referendum Practice during Periods of Divided Government. Romanian Journal of Comparative Law, 10 (2), 264–300.Google Scholar
Suteu, S. (2022a). The View from Nowhere in Constitutional Theory: A Methodological Inquiry. In Kyritsis, D., & Lakin, S., eds., The Methodology of Constitutional Theory. London: Hart, pp. 341–358.Google Scholar
Suteu, S. (2022b). Scotland’s Political and Constitutional Process: Negotiating Independence under a Flexible Constitution. In Vidmar, J., McGibbon, S., & Raible, L., eds., Research Handbook on Secession. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suteu, S., & Tierney, S. (2018). Squaring the Circle? Bringing Deliberation and Participation Together in Processes of Constitution-Making. In Levy, R., Kong, H., & King, J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensen, A., & McCarthy, C. (1998). The International Law of Human Rights and States of Exception, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Svolik, M. (2015). Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation. British Journal of Political Science, 45 (4), 715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, C., ed. (2007). Debating Immigration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenden, W. (2015). Belgium and the Crisis of Governability 2007–2011. Rebooting Territorial Pluralism? In Basta, K., McGarry, J., & Simeon, R., eds., Territorial Pluralism. Managing Difference in Multinational States. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swyngedouw, M., Abts, K., Baute, S. Galle, J., & Meuleman, B. (2015). Het communautaire in de verkiezingen van 25 mei 2014. CeSO/ISPO/2015–1.Google Scholar
Szpiro, G. (2010). Numbers Rule. The Vexing Mathematics of Democracy, From Plato to the Present, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taflaga, M. (2018). What’s in a Name? Semi-Parliamentarism and Australian Commonwealth Executive-Legislative Relations. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53 (2), 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takayasu, K. (2015). Is The Japanese Prime Minister Too Weak or Too Strong?: An Institutional Analysis. 成蹊法学, (83), 147–169.Google Scholar
Takriti, A. R. (2013). Monsoon Revolution: Republicans, Sultans, and Empires in Oman, 1965–1976, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takriti, A. R. (2019a). Colonial Coups and the War on Popular Sovereignty. The American Historical Review, 124 (3), 878–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takriti, A. R. (2019b). Before BDS: Lineages of Boycott in Palestine. Radical History Review, 134, 58–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jönsson, C. (2013). The Opening up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon, S. (2005). The Security Council as World Legislature. The American Journal of International Law, 99 (1), 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, B. (2004). On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K. C. (2017). Cosmopolitan Citizenship. In Shachar, A. et al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 694–713.Google Scholar
Tani, K. (2014). Administrative Equal Protection: Federalism, The Fourteenth Amendment, and the Rights of the Poor. Cornell Law Review, 100 (4), 825–900.Google Scholar
Tani, K. (2019). Administrative Constitutionalism at the “Borders of Belonging”: Drawing on History to Expand the Archive and Change the Lens. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 167 (7), 1603–1630.Google Scholar
Tarullo, D. K. (2017). Monetary policy without a working theory of inflation (Hutchins Center Working Paper No. 33). Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J. (2015). On the Foundations of Human Rights. In Cruft, R., Liao, S. M., & Renzo, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
Taub, N., & Schneider, E. (1990). Women’s Subordination and the Role of Law. In Kairys, D., ed., The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 152–176.Google Scholar
Tavits, M. (2009). Presidents with Prime Ministers. Do Direct Elections Matter? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1979). Hegel and Modern Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985). Atomism. In Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modem Identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2006). What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty? In Miller, David, ed., The Liberty Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., Nanz, P., & Beaubien Taylor, M. (2020). Reconstructing Democracy: How Citizens Are Building from the Ground Up, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. M. (2014). The Limits of Judicial Independence: A Model with Illustration from Venezuela under Chávez. Journal of Latin American Studies, 46 (2), 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ternavasio, M. (2002). La revolución del voto. Política y elecciones en Buenos Aires, 1810–1852, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Tetley, W. (2014). October Crisis 1970: An Insider’s View, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., (2000). Ein Fall von struktureller Korruption? Die Familienbürgschaft in der Kollision unverträglicher Handlungslogiken (BVerfGE 89, 214 ff.). Kritische Vierteljahreszeitschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft (Krit V), 83 (3/4), 388–404.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2012). Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism in the Globalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. (2018). Quod Omnes Tangit: Transnational Constitutions Without Democracy? Journal of Law and Society, 45 (1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Nudge: The Final Edition, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Thatcher, M. (2002). Regulation after Delegation: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (6), 954–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Associated Press. 2020. AP Interview: Egypt Wants UN to Avert Unilateral Fill of Dam. The New York Times, June 21, sec. World. Available from: www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/06/21/world/middleeast/ap-ml-egypt-ethiopia-dam-dispute.html.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2014). Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiemann, M. (2019). Is Resilience Enough? The Macroprudential Reform Agenda and the Lack of Smoothing of the Cycle. Public Administration, 97 (3), 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thies, M., & Yanai, Y. (2014). Bicameralism vs. Parliamentarism: Lessons from Japan’s Twisted Diet. Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies, 30 (2), 60–74.Google Scholar
Thio, L.-A. (2012). Constitutionalism in Illiberal Polities. In Rosenfeld, M., & Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–152.Google Scholar
Thiruvengadam, A. K. (2019). Evaluating Bruce Ackerman’s “Pathways to Constitutionalism” and India as an Exemplar of “Revolutionary Constitutionalism on a Human Scale”. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (2), 682–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoma, R. (1953/2008). Rechtsgutachten betreffend die Stellung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. In Dreier, H., ed., Rechtsstaat – Demokratie – Grundrechte: ausgewählte Abhandlungen aus fünf Jahrzehnten. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 511–554.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. (1902). The Bastille. Vol. I of The French Revolution: A History, London: Chiswick Press.Google Scholar
Thomassen, L. (2007). Within the Limits of Deliberative Reason Alone: Habermas, Civil Disobedience and Constitutional Democracy. European Journal of Political Theory 6 (2), 200–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. (2002). Just Elections. Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (2022). Why Representative Democracy Requires Referendums. In Gardener, James A., ed., Comparative Electoral Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 193–211.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. (2004). What Is It to Wrong Someone? A Puzzle about Justice. In Wallace, R., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., & Smith, M., eds., Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, V. E., & Arroyo, V. (2011). Upside-Down Cooperative Federalism: Climate Change Policymaking and the States. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 29 (1), 1–62.Google Scholar
Thoreau, H. D. (1974). The Writings of Henry David Thoreau: Reform Papers. Edited by Glick, T. F.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2012). Contemporary Constitutionalism and the Dialectic of Constituent Power. Global Constitutionalism, 1 (3), 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2013). A Sociology of Constituent Power: The Political Code of Transnational Societal Constitutions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2), 551–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2017). The Rise and Fall of Corporatist Constitutionalism: A Sociological Thesis. In Pinto, A. C., ed., Corporatism and Fascism: The Corporatist Wave in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2020). Constitutionalism and Populism: National Political Integration and Global Legal Integration. International Theory, 12 (1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrush, A., & Ferris, J. P., eds. (2010). The House of Commons 1604–1629, vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for The History of Parliament Trust.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64 (5), 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiede, L. B. (2006). Judicial Independence: Often Cited, Rarely Understood. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 15 (1), 129–161.Google Scholar
Tierney, S. (2004). Constitutional Law and National Pluralism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, S. (2012). Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, S. (2018). Federalism and Constitutional Theory. In Jacobsohn, G., & Schor, M., eds, Comparative Constitutional Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, Capital, and European States AD 990–1992, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tobin, B. (2016). Marriage Equality in Ireland: The Politico-Legal Context. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 30 (2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, A. (1835). Democracy in America, vol. I. Translated by H. Reeve. London: Saunders and Otley, Conduit Street.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. (2008). The Ancien Régime and the Revolution. Translated by Gerald Bevan. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Toharia, J. J. (1975). Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain. Law and Society Review, 9 (3), 475–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollison, R. (1988). Public Choice and Legislation. Virginia Law Review 74 (2), 339–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, A. (2006). The Struggle to Delimit Executive Power in Britain. In Craig, P., & Tomkins, A., eds., The Executive and Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 16–51.Google Scholar
Tomkins, A. (2010). The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution. University of Toronto Law Journal, 60 (1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, J. (2019a). Justice in the Digital State: Assessing the Next Revolution in Administrative Justice, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, J. (2019b). Quick and Uneasy Justice: An Administrative Analysis of the EU Settlement Scheme. Public Law Project. Available from: https://publiclawproject.org.uk/resources/quick-and-uneasy-justice/Google Scholar
Tormey, S. (2014). The Contemporary Crisis of Representative Democracy. Democratic Theory 1 (2), 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, L. H., & Gudridge, P. O. (2004). The Anti-Emergency Constitution. Yale Law Journal, 113 (8), 1801–1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trochev, A., & Ellett, R. (2014). Judges and Their Allies: Rethinking Judicial Autonomy Through the Prism of Off-Bench Resistance. Journal of Law and Courts, 2 (1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troper, M. (1973). La séparation des pouvoirs et l’histoire constitutionelle française, Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Troper, M. (1994). Pour une théorie juridique de l’Etat, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troper, M. (2008). Comment décident les juges : la constitution, les collectivités locales et l’éducation, Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Trotsky, L. (2017). The History of the Russian Revolution, Chicago, IL: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Trouillot, M. R. (1997). Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Trueblood, L. (2020). Are Referendums Directly Democratic? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40 (3), 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trueblood, L. (2022). Brexit and Two Roles for Referendums in the United Kingdom. In Albert, R., & Stacey, R., eds., The Limits and Legitimacy of Referendums. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, B. (1962). Federalism and the Party System. In Wildavsky, A. B., ed., American Federalism in Perspective. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Tsakyrakis, S. (2009). Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (3), 468–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, R. (2019). Active and Passive Citizens. The Yeoh Tiong Lay Centre for Politics, Philosophy & Law annual lecture. London: King’s College.Google Scholar
Tucker, P. (2018). Unelected Power: The Quest for Legitimacy in Central Banking and the Regulatory State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, J. (1995). Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, K. (2020). Constitutional Review in Finland. In Bogdandy, A. v., Huber, P. M., & Grabenwarter, C., eds., Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Vol. III of The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–221.Google Scholar
Turner, A. (2015). The Case for Monetary Finance – An Essentially Political Issue, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Turpin, C. (2002). British Government and the Constitution, 5th edn, Colchester: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Turner, B. (2001). The Erosion of Citizenship. British Journal of Sociology, 52 (2), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, P. G., ed. (2016). Equity and Administration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. (1999). Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2004). Constitutional Hardball. John Marshall Law Review, 37 (2), 523–553.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2005a). Emergencies and the Idea of Constitutionalism. In Tushnet, M. ed., The Constitution in Wartime: Beyond Alarmism and Complacency. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2005b). The Relationship between Judicial Review of Legislation and the Interpretation of Non-Constitutional Law, with Reference to Third Party Effect. In Sajó, A., & Uitz, R., eds., The Constitution in Private Law Relations. Expanding Constitutionalism. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, pp. 167–182.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2006). Weak-Form Judicial Review and “Core” Civil Liberties, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 41 (1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2008a). The Political Constitution of Emergency Powers: Some Conceptual Issues. In Ramraj, V. V., ed., Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2008b). Weak Courts, Strong Rights. Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2011). Administrative Law in the 1930s: The Supreme Court’s Accommodation of Progressive Legal Theory. Duke Law Journal, 60 (7), 1565–1638.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2015). Authoritarian Constitutionalism. Cornell Law Review, 100 (2), 2015, 391–463.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2017a). Making Easy Cases Harder. In Jackson, V., & Tushnet, M., eds., Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–321.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2017b). Review of Böckenförde, Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings. Constellations, 24 (3), 480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2018a). Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. 2nd revised edn, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2018b). Amendment Theory and Constituent Power. In Jacobson, G., & Schor, M., eds., Comparative Constitutional Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 317–333.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2018c). Comparing Right-wing and Left-wing Populism. In Graber, M., Levinson, S., & Tushnet, M., eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 639–650.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2019). Institutions Supporting Constitutional Democracy: Some Thoughts About Anti-Corruption (and Other) Agencies. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2019, 440–455.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2020). Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2021). The New Fourth Branch: Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tymoigne, E. (2009). Central Banking, Asset Prices and Financial Fragility, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Uitz, R. (2015). Can You Tell When an Illiberal Democracy Is in the Making? An Appeal to Comparative Constitutional Scholarship from Hungary. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13 (1), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbach, M., ed. (2002). German Federalism: Past, Present and Future, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underdal, A. (2010). Complexity and Challenges of Long-Term Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Change, 20 (3), 386–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. (2019a). Emissions Gap Report 2019, Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme. (2019b). Environmental Rule of Law: First Global Report, Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
Urbániková, M., & Šipulová, K. (2018). Failed Expectations: Does the Establishment of Judicial Councils Enhance Confidence in Courts? German Law Journal, 19 (7), 2105–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbina, F. (2017). A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and The People, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2019). Me The People: How Populism Transforms Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. (2008). The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Political Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (1), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Congress. (ca. 2020). Majority and Minority Leaders. United States Senate. Available from: www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Majority_Minority_Leaders.htm (Accessed: 22 September 2020).Google Scholar
Vallier, K. (2015). Public Justification Versus Public Deliberation: The Case for Divorce. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45 (2), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Caenegem, R. C. (2012). An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, F. (2024). Conceptualizing and Measuring Judicial Independence. In Lee Epstein and others (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Judicial Behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 775–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Doorslaer, H., & Vermeiren, M. (2021). Pushing on a String: Monetary Policy, Growth Models and the Persistence of Low Inflation in Advanced Capitalism. New Political Economy, 26 (5), 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Parijs, P. (2008). Linguistic Justice for Europe, Belgium, and the World. In Raymaekers, B., ed., Lectures for the XXIst Century. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Parijs, P. (2011). Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Against Elections: The Case for Democracy, London: Random House.Google Scholar
van ’t Klooster, J. (2018). How to make money: Distributive justice, finance, and monetary constitutions. PhD thesis. Cambridge University.Google Scholar
van ’t Klooster, J. (2019). Central Banking in Rawls’s Property-Owning Democracy. Political Theory, 47 (5), 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van ’t Klooster, J. (2020). The Ethics of Delegating Monetary Policy. Journal of Politics, 82 (2), 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van ’t Klooster, J., & Fontan, C. (2020). The Myth of Market Neutrality: A Comparative Study of the European Central Bank’s and the Swiss National Bank’s Corporate Security Purchases. New Political Economy, 25 (6), 865–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van ’t Klooster, J., & van Tilburg, R. (2020). Targeting a sustainable recovery with Green TLTROs. Positive Money Europe & Sustainable Finance Lab.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargova, M. (2005). Democratic Deficit of a Dualist Deliberative Constitutionalism: Bruce Ackerman and Jürgen Habermas, Ratio Juris, 18 (3), 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varol, O. O., Dalla Peregrina, L., & Groupa, N. (2017). An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Transformation in Turkey. American Journal of Comparative Law, 65 (1), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varuhas, J. (2013). The Reformation of English Administrative Law? “Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality. Cambridge Law Journal, 72 (2), 369–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varuhas, J. (2018). Taxonomy and Public Law. In Elliott, M., Varuhas, J., & Stark, S., eds., The Unity of Public Law? Doctrinal, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 39–78.Google Scholar
Vedel, G. (1985). Rétrodictions: Si de Gaulle avait perdu en 1962, si Alain Poher avait gagné en 1969. In Duhamel, O., & Parodi, J.-L., eds., La Constitution de la cinquième République. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, pp. 133–165.Google Scholar
Vermeule, A. (2007). Mechanisms of Democracy. Institutional Design Writ Small, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, A. (2016). Law’s Abnegation: From Law’s Empire to the Administrative State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versteeg, M., & Ginsburg, T. (2016). Measuring the Rule of Law: A Comparison of Indicators. Law and Social Inquiry, 42 (1), 100–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versteeg, M., & Zackin, E. (2016). Constitutions Unentrenched: Toward an Alternative Theory of Constitutional Design. American Political Science Review, 110 (4), 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viehoff, D. (2014). Democratic Equality and Political Authority. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42 (4), 337–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. (1967). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vinx, L., ed., trans. (2015). The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, L. (2020). The Closure of the International System: How Institutions Create Political Equalities and Hierarchies, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, C. ed. (2013). Rule of Law for Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, S., Gutmann, J., & Feld, L. P. (2015). Economic Growth and Judicial Independence, a Dozen Years On: Cross-country Evidence Using and Updated Set of Indicators. European Journal of Political Economy, 38 (C), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, C. (2012). Why Global Constitutionalism Does not Live up to Its Promises. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 4 (2), 551–574.Google Scholar
Volpp, L. (2017). Feminist, Sexual, and Queer Citizenship. In Shachar, A. et al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–177.Google Scholar
von Haldenwang, C. (2016). Measuring Legitimacy – New Trends, Old Shortcomings? Bonn: Deutsches Institut fur Entwicklungspolitik.Google Scholar
von Mohl, R. (1866). Die Polizeiwissenschaft nach den Grundsaetzen des Rechtsstaates, 3rd edn, Tuebingen: Verlag H. Laupp’schen.Google Scholar
von Stein, L. (2010 [1870]). Handbuch der Verwaltungslehre und des Verwaltungsrechts. Edited by Schliesky, Utz. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Voßkuhle, A. (2004). Die Renaissance der Allgemeinen Staatslehre im Zeitalter der Europäisierung und Internationalisierung, Juristische Schulung, 1 (44), 2–7.Google Scholar
Voßkuhle, A. (2013). Die Staatstheorie des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Der Staat, Beiheft 21, 371–383.Google Scholar
Wade, W. (1955). The Basis of Legal Sovereignty. Cambridge Law Journal, 13 (2), 172–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadsworth, T., & Kubrin, C. E. (2007). Hispanic Suicide in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Examining the Effects of Immigration, Assimilation, Affluence, and Disadvantage. American Journal of Sociology, 112 (6), 1848–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W. (2010). Administrative Law, Filter Failure, and Information Capture. Duke Law Journal, 59 (7), 1321–1432.Google Scholar
Wahl, R. (2006). Herausforderungen und Antworten: Das Öffentliches Recht der letzten fünf Jahrzehnte, Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahnich, S. (2012). In Defence of the Terror: Liberty or Death in the French Revolution, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. (1948). The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration, New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1989a). Democratic Theory and the Public Interest. American Political Science Review, 83, (4), 1322–1328.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1989b). The Rule of Law in Contemporary Liberal Theory. Ratio Juris 2 (1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (1993b). Rights. In Goodin, R., & Pettit, P., eds., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1993c). A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights Review. Oxford Journal Law Review, 13 (1), 18–51.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999b). The Dignity of Legislation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2002). Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)? Law & Philosophy, 21 (2), 137–164.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2004). Liberalism, Political and Comprehensive. In Gaus, G., & Kukathas, C., eds., Handbook of Political Theory. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2005). Compared to What? Judicial Activism and the New Zealand Parliament. New Zealand Law Journal, 2005 (11), 441–445.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2006). The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, 115 (6), 1346–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2007). Dignity and Rank. European Journal of Sociology, 48 (2), 201–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2008). Did Dworkin Ever Answer the Crits? In Hershovitz, S., ed., Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2008–2009). The Concept and the Rule of Law. Georgia Law Review, 43 (1), 1–61.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2011a). Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law? European Journal of International Law, 22 (2), 315–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2011b). The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure. In Flemming, J., ed., Getting to the Rule of Law: NOMOS L. New York: New York University Press, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2011c). Thoughtfulness and the Rule of Law. British Academy Review, 18, 1–8.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2012a). Bicameralism and the Separation of Powers. Current Legal Problems, 65 (1), 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2012b). Dignity, Rank and Rights, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2012c). How Law Protects Dignity. Cambridge Law Journal, 71 (1), 200–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2012d). The Rule of Law and the Measure of Property, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2013). Citizenship and Dignity. In McCrudden, C., ed., Understanding Human Dignity. London: The British Academy, pp. 327–343.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2014a). Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts? Yale Law Journal, 123 (6), 1692–1731.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2014b). Never Mind the Constitution. Harvard Law Review, 127 (4), 1147–1172.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2015). Is Dignity the Foundation of Human Rights? In Liao, M., Renzo, M., & Cruft, R., eds., The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016a). Accountability and Insolence. In Waldron, J., Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 167–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016b). Constitutionalism: A Skeptical View. In Waldron, J., Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016c). Political Political Theory. In Waldron, J., Political Political Theory. Essays on Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016d). Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions, Cambridge, M: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016e). Representative Lawmaking. In Waldron, J., Political Political Theory. Essays on Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016f). Separation of Powers in Thought and Practice. In Waldron, J., Political Political Theory. Essays on Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2017). One Another’s Equals. The Basis of Human Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2018). All Kings in the Kingdom of Ends. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 13–39. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3207754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldstreicher, D. (2010). Slavery’s Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification, New York: Hill & Wang Inc.Google Scholar
Walen, A. (2009). Judicial Review in Review: A Four-Part Defense of Legal Constitutionalism. A Review Essay on Political Constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (2), 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. (2002). The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. Modern Law Review, 65 (3), 317–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. (2003). Postnational Constitutionalism and the Problem of Translation. In Weiler, J., & Wind, M., eds., European Constitutionalism beyond the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, N. (2016). The Return of Constituent Power: A Reply to Mattias Kumm. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14 (4), 906–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. (2019). Populism and Constitutional Tension, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (2), 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waluchow, W. J. (2007). A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 52 (1), 297–312.Google Scholar
Waluchow, W. J. (2014). Constitutional Interpretation. In Marmor, A., ed., The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. New York: Routledge, pp. 417–433.Google Scholar
Waluchow, W. J. & Kyritsis, D. (2023). Constitutionalism. In Zalta, E., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition). Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/constitutionalism/.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1970). Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ward, H., & Weale, A. (2010). Is Rule by Majorities Special? Political Studies, 58 (1), 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2017). A Problem-based Approach to Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 111 (1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2018). How Representation Enables Democratic Citizenship. In Castiglione, D., & Pollack, J., eds., Creating Political Presence: The New Politics of Democratic Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E., & Pearse, H., eds. (2008). Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizen’s Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, D., & Lemieux, S. (2015). Compared to What? Judicial Review and Other Veto Points in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Perspectives on Politics, 13 (2), 312–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, R. L. (2008). Comparing Federal Systems, 3rd edn, Kingston/Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R. L. (1998). Federalism, Federal Political Systems, and Federations. Annual Review of Political Science, 1 (1), 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous Place-Thought & Agency Amongst Humans and Non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European World Tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2 (1), 20–34.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. H., & Kysar, D. A. (2017). Courting Disaster: Climate Change and the Adjudication of Catastrophe. Notre Dame Law Journal, 93 (1), 295–356.Google Scholar
Webb, P. (2013). International Judicial Integration and Fragmentation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb Yackee, J., & Webb Yackee, S. (2006). A Bias toward Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy. Journal of Politics 68 (1), 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, G. (2014). On the Loss of Rights. In Huscroft, G., Miller, B., & Webber, G., eds., Proportionality and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, G. (2017). Loyal Opposition and the Political Constitution, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 37 (2), 357–382.Google Scholar
Webber, G., Yowell, P., Ekins, R.; Köpcke, M., Miller, B. W., & Urbina, F. J. (2018). Legislated Rights: Securing Human Rights through Legislation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, G., & Yowell, P. (2020). Legislated Rights in the real world. Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, 20 (1), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1946). Bureaucracy. In H.H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills, eds., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford, 196–245.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1964). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Edited by Winckelmann, J.. Vol. II. Köln, Berlin: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by Roth, G., & Wittich, C.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1994 [1919]). Parliament and Government in Germany under a New Political Order. In Lassman, P., & Speirs, R. eds., Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–217.Google Scholar
Weil, P. (2012). The Sovereign Citizen, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Weil, S. (2013 [1950]). On the Abolition of Parties. Translated by S. Leys. New York: New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. (1981). The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism, Yearbook of European Law, 1, 268–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). The Transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal, 100 (8), 2403–2483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (2003). In Defense of the Status Quo, Europe’s Constitutional Sonderweg. In Weiler, J. H. H., & Wind, M., eds., European Constitutionalism beyond the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–25.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U. R., & Mayer, F. C. (1995). European Democracy and Its Critique, West European Politics, 18 (3), 4–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., & Wind, M., eds. (2003). European Constitutionalism beyond the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, P. (1982). The New Liberalism: Liberal Social Theory in Great Britain, 1889–1914, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weill, R. (2012). Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Review: On the Theoretical and Historical Origins of the Israeli Legislative Override Power. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 39 (2), 457–512.Google Scholar
Weill, R. (2014). The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism Notwithstanding: On Judicial Review and Constitution-Making. American Journal of Comparative Law, 62, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, J. (2018). The View from the Oval Office: Understanding the Legislative Presidency. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24 (4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, J. (2016). Dimensions of Dignity: The Theory and Practice of Modern Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, J. (2018). Climate Change Disinformation, Citizen Competence, and the First Amendment. University of Colorado Law Review, 89 (2), 341–376.Google Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2001). Towards a Normative Theory of Federalism. International Social Science Journal, 53 (167), 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2003). The Antinomy of Language Rights. In Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A., eds., Language Rights and Political Theory. Oxford: University Press, pp. 250–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2010). On Voting Ethics for Dual Nationals. In Breen, K., ed., After the Nation-State. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2015a). In Praise of Some Unfashionable Democratic Institutions: Political Parties, Party Discipline, and “First Past the Post”. Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law, 9, 291–306.Google Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2015b). Health Justice after the Social Determinants of Health Revolution. Social Theory and Health, 13 (3–4), 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2015c). Integrating Intermediate Goods to Theories of Distributive Justice: The Importance of Platforms. Res Publica, 21 (2), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2016). How Democratic Is Civil Disobedience? Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10 (4), 707–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2017). The Complex Normative Landscape of Electoral Systems. In Loewen, P., Potter, A., & Weinstock, D., eds., Should We Change How We Vote? Montreal: McGill-Queens Press, pp. 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2019). On Partisan Compromise. Political Theory, 47 (1), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. (2020). What’s So Funny About Voting Rights For Children? Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, 18 (2), 751–771.Google Scholar
Weis, L. (2017). Constitutional Directive Principles. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 37 (4), 916–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellens, K. (2010). Revisiting Solidarity as a (Re-) Emerging Constitutional Principle: Some Further Reflections. In Wolfrum, R., & Kojima, C., eds., Solidarity: A Structural Principle of International Law. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, P. (2015). Cabinet Government. In Galligan, B., & Brenton, S., eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, C. H. (2008). Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics, 119 (1), 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, C. H. (2011). In Defense of the Right to Exclude. In Brock, G., & Wellman, C. H., Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welp, Y., & Whitehead, L. (2020). Recall: Democratic Advance, Safety Valve or Risky Adventure? In Welp, Y. and Whitehead, L., eds., The Politics of Recall Elections. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, L. (2017). John Rawls. In Zalta, E., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/rawls/Google Scholar
Wenar, L. (2020). Rights. In Zalta, E., ed., The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition). Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/rights/Google Scholar
Wendenburg, H. (1984). Die Debatte um die Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und der Methodenstreit der Staatsrechtslehre in der Weimarer Republik, Göttingen: Schwartz.Google Scholar
Werner, F. (1959). Verwaltungsrecht als konkretisiertes Verfassungsrecht, Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt, 74, 527–533.Google Scholar
West, R. (2003). Re-Imagining Justice: Progressive Interpretations of Formal Equality, Rights, and The Rule of Law, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
West, R. (2011). The Limits of Process. In Fleming, J., ed., Getting to the Rule of Law: NOMOS L. New York: New York University Press, pp. 32–51.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2020). Populism’s Threat to Democracy: Comparative Lessons for the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 18 (2), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, C., & Whalen, B. (1989). The Longest Debate: A Legislative History of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Cabin John; Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.Google Scholar
White, J. (1998). Talking about Religion in the Language of the Law: Impossible but Necessary. Marquette Law Review, 81 (2), 177–202.Google Scholar
White, J. (2018). The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay: The Ethics of Political Alliance. British Journal of Political Science, 48 (3), 593–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. (2021). What Kind of Electoral System Sustains a Politics of Firm Commitments? Representation, 57 (3), 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J., & Ypi, L. (2010). Rethinking the Modern Prince: Partisanship and the Democratic Ethos. Political Studies, 58 (4), 809–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J., & Ypi, L. (2016). The Meaning of Partisanship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J., & Ypi, L. (2020a). Reselection and Deselection in the Political Party. In Welp, Y., & Whitehead, L., eds., The Politics of Recall Elections. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J., & Ypi, L. (2020b). Recalling Representatives. In Urbinati, N., eds., Thinking Democracy Now: Between Innovation and Regression. Milan: Feltrinelli, pp. 135–150.Google Scholar
White, S. (1997). Freedom of Association and the Right to Exclude. Journal of Political Philosophy, 5 (4), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. (2020). Citizens’ Assemblies and Radical Democracy. In Leipold, B., Nabulsi, K., & White, S., eds., Radical Republicanism: Recovering the Tradition’s Popular Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. K. (2017). A Democratic Bearing: Admirable Citizens, Uneven Injustice, and Critical Theory, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, K. (2017). Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes, 55 (1–2), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widner, J. (1999). Building Judicial Independence in Common Law Africa. In Schedler, A., Diamond, L., & Plattner, M., eds., The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, A. (2018). Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. (2005). Realism and Moralism in Political Theory. In Williams, B. ed., In the Beginning Was the Deed. Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Williams, G, Brennan, S, & Lynch, A. (2014). Blackshield and Williams: Australian Constitutional Law and Theory, 6th edn, Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Williams, I. (2021). James VI and I, rex et iudex: One King as Judge in Two Kingdoms. In Eves, W., Hudson, J., Ivarsen, I., & White, S. B., eds., Common Law, Civil Law and Colonial Law: Essays in Comparative Legal History from the Twelfth to the Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. S. (1998). Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington Means by Policy Reform. In Williamson, J., ed., Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, pp. 5–38.Google Scholar
Willoughby, W. W. (1992 [1896]). An Examination of the Nature of the State: A Study in Political Philosophy, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (1992). American Constitutional Conventions. Buffalo Law Review, 40 (3), 645–738.Google Scholar
Winkler, H. (2006). Germany: The Long Road West. Volume 1: 1789–1933, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winterton, G. (1980). Can the Commonwealth Parliament Enact “Manner and Form” Legislation? Federal Law Review, 11 (2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, J. F. (2007). Anglo-American Empire and the Crisis of the Legal Frame (Will the Real British Empire Please Stand Up?). Harvard Law Review, 120 (3), 754–796.Google Scholar
Wong, D. (2004). Rights and Community in Confucianism. In Shun, K.-L., & Wong, D. B., eds., Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, S. (1997). Happiness and Meaning: Two Aspects of the Good Life. Social Philosophy and Policy, 14 (1), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J., & de-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, R. P. (1998). In Defense of Anarchism, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfrum, R. (2006 ). Solidarity Amongst States: An Emerging Structural Principle of International Law. In: Dupuy, P.-M., Fassbender, B., Shaw, M., & Sommermann, K., eds., Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat. Kehl: Engel, pp. 1087–1101.Google Scholar
Wolkestein, F. (2019). Rethinking Party Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G. S. (1969). The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wood, G. S. (1993). The Radicalism of the American Revolution, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Wood, S., Eberlein, B., Meidinger, E., Schmidt, R., & Abbott, K. W. (2019). Transnational Business Governance Interactions, Regulatory Quality and Marginalized Actors: An Introduction. In Wood, S. et al., eds., Transnational Business Governance Interactions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S., Tanner, G., & Richardson, B. J. (2010). What Ever Happened to Canadian Environmental Law? Ecology Law Quarterly, 37 (4), 981–1040.Google Scholar
Wright, G. (2013). Sharing the Prize: The Economics of the Civil Rights Revolution in the American South, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. (2019). Pluralism and social epistemology in economics. PhD thesis. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Yamin, A., & Parra, O. (2009). The role of courts in Refining Health policy: The case of the Colombian Court. Manuscript in file with R. Gargarella.Google Scholar
Yamin, A., & Gloppen, S. (2011). Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeager, L. (1962). In Search of a Monetary Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, K. (2010). The Regulatory State. In Baldwin, R., & Lodge, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–84.Google Scholar
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12 (4), 505–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. (2008). Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. (1986). The Washington Community 1800–1828, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Young, K. (2012). Constituting Economic and Social Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yowell, P. (2018). Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design: Moral and Empirical Reasoning in Judicial Review, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Zack, N. (2015). White Privilege and Black Rights: The Injustice of U.S. Police Racial Profiling and Homicide, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Zacklin, R. (1968). The Amendment of the Constitutive Instruments of the United Nations and Specialised Agencies, Leyden: Sijthoff (reprint 2005 Brill).Google Scholar
Zahra, T. (2016). The Great Departure: Mass Migration from Eastern Europe and the Making of the Free World, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. (2012). The Constitution of China: A Contextual Analysis, Oxford: Hart Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, D. (2009). The Mandate of Heaven and Performance Legitimacy in Historical and Contemporary China. American Behavioral Scientist, 53 (3), 416–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziller, J. (2008). Political Accountability in France. In Broeksteeg, H., Verhey, L., & Van den Driessche, I., eds., Political Accountability in Europe: Which Way Forward? Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar
Zinn, H. (2002 [1968]). Disobedience and Democracy: Nine Fallacies of Law and Order, Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Zreik, R. (2018). Kant on Time and Revolution. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 39 (1), 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuber, Christina I., & Szöcsik, E. (2015). Ethnic Outbidding and Nested Competition: Explaining the Extremism of Ethnonational Minority Parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 54 (4), 784–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, I. (2006). One Law for War and Peace? Judicial Review and Emergency Powers between the Norm and the Exception. Constellations, 13 (4), 522–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurn, C. (2007). Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurn, C. (2010). The Logic of Legitimacy: Bootstrapping Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy. Legal Theory, 16 (3), 191–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurn, C. (2011). Judicial Review, Constitutional Juries and Civic Constitutional Fora: Rights, Democracy and Law. Theoria, 58 (2), 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurn, C. F. (2020). Constitutional Interpretation and Public Reason: Seductive Disanalogies. In Langvatn, S. A., Kumm, M., & Sadurski, W., eds., Public Reason and the Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweifel, T. (2006). International Organizations and Democracy: Accountability, Politics, and Power, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Zweig, E. (1909). Die Lehre vom Pouvoir Constituant: Ein Beitrag zum Staatrecht der französischen Revolution, Tübingen: JCB Mohr.Google Scholar