Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Authors’ Affiliations
- Acknowledgment
- Part I General Chapters
- Part II Country Reports
- 17 Competition Law Sanctions in Austria
- 18 Antitrust Enforcement in Belgium
- 19 The Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Brazil
- 20 The Present Situation and Improvement Direction of the Sanction System in China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- 21 Application of the 2006 Guidelines on Fines by the European Commission and the Union Courts
- 22 Competition Law Sanctions in Germany
- 23 Competition Law Sanctions in Hungary
- 24 Competition Law Sanctions in Indonesia and a Comparison to Other ASEAN Member States
- 25 Competition Law Sanctions in Italy
- 26 Competition Law Sanctions in Japan
- 27 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Kenya
- 28 The Enforcement of Competition Law in the Netherlands
- 29 A Barking Dog Seldom Bites
- 30 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions
- 31 Competition Law Sanctions in Spain
- 32 The Swedish Competition Law Enforcement System
- 33 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Turkey
- 34 Competition Law Sanctions in the United Kingdom
29 - A Barking Dog Seldom Bites
Some Comments on Competition Law Sanctions Policy in Poland
from Part II - Country Reports
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2022
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Authors’ Affiliations
- Acknowledgment
- Part I General Chapters
- Part II Country Reports
- 17 Competition Law Sanctions in Austria
- 18 Antitrust Enforcement in Belgium
- 19 The Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Brazil
- 20 The Present Situation and Improvement Direction of the Sanction System in China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- 21 Application of the 2006 Guidelines on Fines by the European Commission and the Union Courts
- 22 Competition Law Sanctions in Germany
- 23 Competition Law Sanctions in Hungary
- 24 Competition Law Sanctions in Indonesia and a Comparison to Other ASEAN Member States
- 25 Competition Law Sanctions in Italy
- 26 Competition Law Sanctions in Japan
- 27 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Kenya
- 28 The Enforcement of Competition Law in the Netherlands
- 29 A Barking Dog Seldom Bites
- 30 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions
- 31 Competition Law Sanctions in Spain
- 32 The Swedish Competition Law Enforcement System
- 33 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Turkey
- 34 Competition Law Sanctions in the United Kingdom
Summary
Polish competition law is characterized by the strong predominance of public enforcement. The crucial component of the Polish system of sanctions has always been administrative corporate fines regulated in much the same way as under EU Law. So far, however, the Polish competition law does not recognize the concept of the single economic unit. This means that the amount of fine is always calculated on the basis of the whole or a part of a direct infringer's turnover. Similarly the fines imposed on associations of undertakings are calculated exclusively on the basis of an association’s turnover. Such a concept of undertaking contributes to the intensification of one of the problems related to enforcement of Polish competition law: the low level of fines imposed by the Competition Authority (CA). The 2014 ACCP amendment introduced into the Polish system individual administrative fines of up to PLN 2 million (c. EUR 450,000) for intentional infringements of the prohibition of anticompetitive agreements, and remedies which may be imposed with or without a fine. These amendments may have significant impact on the effectiveness of the Polish competition law system, in particular by strengthening the deterrent effect of the decisions of the CA.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions , pp. 580 - 612Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022