Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:07:40.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - The Case for Case in Chinese

from Part Four - Syntax-semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2022

By
Yen-hui Audrey Li
Edited by
Chu-Ren Huang ,
Yen-Hwei Lin ,
I-Hsuan Chen  and
Yu-Yin Hsu
Chu-Ren Huang
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Yen-Hwei Lin
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
I-Hsuan Chen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Yu-Yin Hsu
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Get access

Summary

Case theory is a theoretical tool in the generative grammar to capture generalizations regarding categorial distribution, particularly the nominal category in relation to others. The notion of case can describe the close relation between grammatical categories, such as a verb/preposition and its object, or the subject of a sentence and the tense or agreement of the sentence. This chapter reviews the advantages of adopting the notion of abstract case in Chinese, a language without overt morphological case marking. Data and issues discussed include how the challenges Chinese poses to the word order correlations proposed as universals or tendencies in typological studies cease to be problems if the notion of abstract case interacts with word order universals, what the postverbal structure constraint is in Chinese, and how Case plays a role in the analysis, whether there are true pre-nominal PPs in Chinese, and whether tensed and non-tensed clauses can be distinguished in Chinese, as well as the role of case in capturing the behavior of clauses.

Keywords

orderingtensepreposition vs. postpositionpostverbal constraint
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics , pp. 467 - 485
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babby, Leonard. 1991. Noncanonical configurational case assignment strategies. In Cornell working papers in linguistics 9, ed. Toribio, Almeida J. and Harbert, Wayne E., 1–55. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. Jacobs, Roderick A. and Rosenbaum, Peter S., 184–221. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Chauncy C. 1979. The word order change in Chinese and its problems. In Yuyanxue Lunji 语言学论集, ed. Chu, Chauncy C., 87–121. Taipei: Crane Books.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 1987. Duration adverbials and Chinese phrase structure. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 22:1–11.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 1996. On adjunct case in Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 25:167–197.Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2003. Prosodically constrained postverbal PPs in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 41(6):1085–1122.Google Scholar
Grano, Thomas. 2017. Finiteness contrasts without tense? A view from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26:259–299.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, ed. Greenberg, Joseph, 40–70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1983. Word order universals. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Jianhua, Pan, Haihua, and Xu, Liejiong. 2001. Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics 39:1117–1148.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1994a. More on Chinese word order and parametric theory. In Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Volume 1: Phrase structure, ed. Lust, Barbara, Whitman, John, and Kornfilt, Jaklin, 15–35. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1994b. Verb movement and some syntax–semantics mismatches in Chinese, Chinese Languages and Linguistics 2:587–613.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 2017. On finiteness and the architecture of complements in verbal and nominal domains. Talk given at the 11th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics, Taipei.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Audrey Li, Y.-H., and Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Nick. 2015. On syntactic tense in Mandarin Chinese. In Proceedings of the 27th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, vol. 2, ed. Tao, Hongyin with Lee, Yu‐Hui, Su, Danjie, Tsurumi, Keiko, Wang, Wei, and Yang, Ying, 406–423. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Huang, Nick. 2018. Control complements in Mandarin Chinese: Implications for restructuring and the Chinese finiteness debate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27:347–376.Google Scholar
Huang, Shuan-fan. 1978. Historical change of prepositions and emergence of SOV order. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6:212–242.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 1994. The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to universal grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40:187–237.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–392.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 2018. AP-de (地) adverbs in Mandarin. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39:1–28.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 55–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1975. The semantic function of word order: A case study in Mandarin. In Word order and word order change, ed. Li, Charles N., 164–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Li, Meng-zhen. 1979. An investigation of word order change in Chinese. Papers from the 1979 Asian and Pacific Conference on Linguistics and Language Teaching, ed. Tang, Tingchi, Tsao, Fengfu, and Li, Ing, 261–274. Taipei: Student Books.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1985. Abstract case in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1987. Duration phrases: Distributions and interpretations. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 22:27–65.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2008. Case, 20 years later. Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 41–68. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University,Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2013. Case, tense and clauses. In Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond, ed. Chappell, Hilary, Djamouri, Redouane, and Wiebusch, Thekla, 203–235. Paris/Taipei: Le Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale, l’infrastructure de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS)/Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2014. Thematic hierarchy and derivational economy. Language and Linguistics 15:295–339.Google Scholar
Lin, Tzong-Hong. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1989. Adverbials and structural case in Korean. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics 3, ed. Kim, Young-joo, Kuno, Susumo, Whitman, John, Kang, Young-Se, Lee, Ik-Hwan, and Bak, Sung-Yun, 291–309. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1992. Of nominative and accusative: The hierarchical assignment of grammatical Case in Finnish. In Case and other function categories in Finnish syntax, ed. Holmberg, Anders and Nikanne, Urpo, 49–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mei, Kuang. 1979. Is Modern Chinese really a SOV language? In Papers from the 1979 Asian and Pacific Conference on Linguistics and Language Teaching, ed. Tang, Tingchi, Tsao, Fengfu, and Li, Ing, 275–297. Taipei: Student Books.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Erika. 1991. Case and the Finnish object. In Cornell working papers in linguistics 9, ed. Toribio, Almeida J. and Harbert, Wayne E., 193–228. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ross, (Haj) John. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Soh, Hooi-Ling. 1998. Object scrambling in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Sun, Chao-Fen and Givón, Talmy. 1985. On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language 61:329–351.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Whether we tense-agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry 38:580–587.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2009. Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements: Data, diagnostics, and preliminary analyses. In NYU working papers in linguistics, vol. 2: Papers in syntax, ed. Irwin, Patricia and Maldonado, Violeta Vasquez Rojas. New York, NY: New York University.Google Scholar
Tai, James H.-Y. 1973. Chinese as a SOV language. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 659–671. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Takano, Yuji. 1996. Movement and parametric variation in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. The (non-)existence of gapping in Chinese and its implications for the theory of gapping. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10:201–224.Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2015. A generalized syntactic schema for utterance particles in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 1:1–23.Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing. 邓思颖. 2016. Sentence-final particles as conjuncts under the cartographic approach 制图理论与助词的联合结构说. Bulletin of Linguistic Studies 语言研究集刊 2016(1):1–10.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and the effects of word order variation. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-tian. 1995. Visibility, complement selection and the case requirement of CP. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4:281–312.Google Scholar
Wei, Wei Haley, and Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2018. Adverbial clauses in Mandarin Chinese, part 1: Preverbal adverbial PPs and clauses. Linguistic Analysis 42:163–234.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 1986. Free empty category. Linguistic Inquiry 17:75–94.Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2016. Identifying Chinese dependent clauses in the forms of subjects. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25:275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2019. Complex indefinites and the projection of DP in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28:179–210.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×