Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law
- The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Taking Centre Stage in Global Governance and the International Legal Order
- Part II Interfaces between National and International Law
- Part III Selected Areas of Chinese State Practice
- 7 China’s Treaty Practices
- 8 The Solid State of State Immunity in the People’s Republic of China
- 9 The ‘Effect Doctrine’ and the Extraterritorial Application of Chinese National Laws
- Part IV International Peace and Security
- Part V Human-Centred International Law
- Part VI The Habitat and the Global Commons
- Part VII International Economic Law
- Part VIII International Dispute Settlement
- Index
8 - The Solid State of State Immunity in the People’s Republic of China
from Part III - Selected Areas of Chinese State Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
- The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law
- The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Taking Centre Stage in Global Governance and the International Legal Order
- Part II Interfaces between National and International Law
- Part III Selected Areas of Chinese State Practice
- 7 China’s Treaty Practices
- 8 The Solid State of State Immunity in the People’s Republic of China
- 9 The ‘Effect Doctrine’ and the Extraterritorial Application of Chinese National Laws
- Part IV International Peace and Security
- Part V Human-Centred International Law
- Part VI The Habitat and the Global Commons
- Part VII International Economic Law
- Part VIII International Dispute Settlement
- Index
Summary
The doctrine of state immunity occupies a contentious space in China’s contemporary approach to international law. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) insists on the doctrine of absolute immunity: Chinese courts cannot exercise jurisdiction over a foreign state without its permission, nor can foreign courts exercise jurisdiction over the PRC without its consent. This position contrasts with the doctrine of restrictive immunity, which holds that domestic courts may hear a limited number of cases against foreign governments that engage in commercial activity or seize foreign-owned property. In maintaining the absolute position, China clings to the traditional view. However, recent overtures suggest that China may begin a shift, made by many other countries, towards the restrictive theory. Ultimately, this chapter is agnostic as to whether China should adopt the restrictive theory.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law , pp. 161 - 180Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024