Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:29:45.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Phonetic and Phonological L1 Attrition and Drift in Bilingual Speech

from Part VI - Variables and Outcomes of Bilingual Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Esther de Leeuw  and
Charles B. Chang
Edited by
Mark Amengual
Mark Amengual
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents an overview of what is currently known about phonetic and phonological first language (L1) attrition and drift in bilingual speech and introduces a new theory of bilingual speech, Attrition & Drift in Access, Production, and Perception Theory (ADAPPT). Attrition and drift are defined and differentiated along several dimensions, including duration of change, source in second language (L2) experience, consciousness, agency, and scope. We address why findings of attrition and drift are important for our overall understanding of bilingual speech and draw links between ADAPPT and well-known theories of L2 speech, such as the revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r), the Perceptual Assimilation Model-L2 (PAM-L2), and the Second Language Linguistic Perception model (L2LP). The significance of findings revealing attrition and drift is discussed in relation to different linguistic subfields. The chapter raises the question of how attrition and drift potentially interact to influence speech production and perception in the bilingual’s L1 over the life span; additional directions for future research are pointed out as well.

Keywords

late bilingualismbidialectalismlife-span developmentcritical periodindividual differencescross-language interactionscolonialismperception–production linkexemplar theorylinguistic performancesociolinguisticsattritiondriftphoneticsphonology
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology , pp. 721 - 745
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, S., Chang, C. B., DeKeyser, R., & Lee-Ellis, S. (2017). Age effects in first language attrition: Speech perception by Korean-English bilinguals. Language Learning, 67(3), 694–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkhudidi, A., Stevenson, R., & Rafat, Y. (2020). Geminate attrition in the speech of Arabic-English bilinguals living in Canada. Heritage Language Journal, 17(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baese-Berk, M. M. (2019). Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 981–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, W. & Trofimovich, P. (2005). Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech, 48(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrientos, F. (2023). On segmental representations in second language phonology: A perceptual account. Second Language Research, 39(1), 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, E. F., Burnham, D., & Kitamura, C. (2001). Bilingualism and the relationship between perception and production: Greek/English bilinguals and Thai bilabial stops. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(2), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, C., Nota, A., Sprenger, S. A., & Schmid, M. S. (2016). L2 immersion causes non-native-like L1 pronunciation in German attriters. Journal of Phonetics, 58(Supp. C), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 171–204.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14(3), 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Yeni‐Komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French‐English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(2), 421–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celata, C. (2019). Phonological attrition. In Schmid, M. S. & Köpke, B., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Attrition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 218–227.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill, P. (1998). Dialectology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2013). A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2019a). Language change and linguistic inquiry in a world of multicompetence: Sustained phonetic drift and its implications for behavioral linguistic research. Journal of Phonetics, 74, 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2019b). Phonetic drift. In Schmid, M. S. & Köpke, B., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Attrition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–203.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. & Ahn, S. (2023). Examining the role of phoneme frequency in first language perceptual attrition. Languages, 8(1), 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B., Yao, Y., Haynes, E. F., & Rhodes, R. (2011). Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(6), 3964–3980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, H.-S., Niziolek, C. A., Buchwald, A., & McAllister, T. (2021). Examining the relationship between speech perception, production distinctness, and production variability. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 660948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheshire, J. (2020). Taking the longer view: Explaining Multicultural London English and Multicultural Paris French. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(3), 308–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P., Fox, S., & Torgersen, E. (2011). Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 151–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1992). Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42(4), 557–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. [J.] (2003). The changing L1 in the L2 user’s mind. In Cook, V., ed., Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. (1984). Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 49–70.Google Scholar
De Bot, K. & Clyne, M. (1994). A 16‐year longitudinal study of language attrition in Dutch immigrants in Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E. (2019a). Phonetic attrition. In Schmid, M. S. and Köpke, B., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Attrition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–217.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, E. (2019b). Native speech plasticity in the German-English late bilingual Stefanie Graf: A longitudinal study over four decades. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E. & Celata, C. (2019). Plasticity of native phonetic and phonological domains in the context of bilingualism. Journal of Phonetics, 75, 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Kapia, E., & Lewis, S. (2023). Sound change in Albanian monolinguals and Albanian-English sequential bilingual returnees in Tirana, Albania. Languages, 8(1), 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Mennen, I., & Scobbie, J. M. (2012). Singing a different tune in your native language: First language attrition of prosody. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Mennen, I., & Scobbie, J. M. (2013). Dynamic systems, maturational constraints and L1 phonetic attrition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(6), 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Opitz, C., & Lubinska, D. (2013). Dynamics of first language attrition across the lifespan. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(6), 667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Schmid, M. S., & Mennen, I. (2010). The effects of contact on native language pronunciation in an L2 migrant setting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Stockall, L., Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., & Gorba Masip, C. (2021). Illusory vowels in Spanish-English sequential bilinguals: Evidence that accurate L2 perception is neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate L2 production. Second Language Research, 37(4), 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Tusha, A., & Schmid, M. S. (2018). Individual phonological attrition in Albanian-English late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 278–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, O., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2010). Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, O., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2020). The effect of instructed second language learning on the acoustic properties of first language speech. Languages, 5, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht].Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2009). The linguistic perception of similar L2 sounds. In Boersma, P. & Hamann, S., eds., Phonology in Perception. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 151–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, B. G. & Iverson, P. (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(6), 3814–3826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 233–272.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R., ed., Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Eefting, W. (1987). Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication, 6(3), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, S. (2015). The New Cockney: New Ethnicities and Adolescent Speech in the Traditional East End of London. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fox, S. & Torgersen, E. (2018). Language change and innovation in London: Multicultural London English. In Braber, N. & Jansen, S., eds., Sociolinguistics in England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S. & Baayen, R. H. (2019). Twenty-eight years of vowels: Tracking phonetic variation through young to middle age adulthood. Journal of Phonetics, 74, 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N., eds., Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorba Masip, C. & Cebrian, J. (2021). The role of L2 experience in L1 and L2 perception and production of voiceless stops by English learners of Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 88, 101094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M. L. & de Leeuw, S. N. (2012). Social determinants of health and the future well-being of Aboriginal children in Canada. Paediatrics & Child Health, 17(7), 381–384.Google ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J. (2006). An acoustic analysis of “happy-tensing” in the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966). Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist, 68(4), 922–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, J., Jannedy, S., & Mendoza-Denton, N. (1999). Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style. In Ohala, J. J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D., & Bailey, A. C., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. International Phonetic Association, pp. 1389–1392. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS1999/papers/p14_1389.pdf.Google Scholar
Hay, J. B., Pierrehumbert, J. B., Walker, A. J., & LaShell, P. (2015). Tracking word frequency effects through 130 years of sound change. Cognition, 139, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herd, W. J., Walden, R. L., Knight, W. L., & Alexander, S. N. (2015). Phonetic drift in a first language dominant environment. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 23(1), 060005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. & Schmid, M. S. (2013). Perceived foreign accent in first language attrition and second language acquisition: The impact of age of acquisition and bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(2), 361–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulsen, M. (2000). Language loss and language processing: Three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand. [Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen].Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2003). Probing the effects of the L2 on the L1: A case study. In Cook, V., ed., Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartushina, N. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2014). On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2016). Mutual influences between native and non-native vowels in production: Evidence from short-term visual articulatory feedback training. Journal of Phonetics, 57, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartushina, N. & Martin, C. D. (2019). Third-language learning affects bilinguals’ production in both their native languages: A longitudinal study of dynamic changes in L1, L2 and L3 vowel production. Journal of Phonetics, 77, 100920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, J. & Chang, C. B. (2023). Exploring the onset of phonetic drift in voice onset time perception. Languages, 8(1), 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, M. (2009). Phonetic accommodation in conversations between native and non-native speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(4), 2764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B. (2004). Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B. & Schmid, M. S. (2004). Language attrition: The next phase. In Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M., & Weilemar, L., eds., First Language Attrition: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Methodological Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1971). The study of language in its social context. In Fishman, J. A., ed., Advances in the Sociology of Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 152–216.Google Scholar
Lang, B. & Davidson, L. (2019). Effects of exposure and vowel space distribution on phonetic drift: Evidence from American English learners of French. Language and Speech, 62(1), 30–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2005). Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end, and there is no state. In Han, Z. & Odlin, T., eds., Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1969). On explaining language. Science, 164(3880), 635–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lev-Ari, S. & Peperkamp, S. (2013). Low inhibitory skill leads to non-native perception and production in bilinguals’ native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 320–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1507–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. C. (1992). Losing English as a first language. Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzo, S. (2016). Exploring the social meaning of contemporary urban vernaculars: Perceptions and attitudes about Citétaal in Flanders. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(5), 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, R., Price, S., & Mennen, I. (2012). First language attrition in the speech of Dutch-English bilinguals: The case of monozygotic twin sisters. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 687–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnik-Leroy, G. A., Turnbull, R., & Peperkamp, S. (2021). On the relationship between perception and production of L2 sounds: Evidence from Anglophones’ processing of the French /u/–/y/ contrast. Second Language Research, 38(3), 581–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32(4), 543–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In Delais-Roussarie, E., Avanzi, M., & Herment, S., eds., Prosody and Language in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition and Languages in Multilingual Situations. Berlin: Springer, pp. 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. (2011). Introducing Sociolinguistics, 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Flege, J. E. (1999). Canadians in Alabama: A perceptual study of dialect acquisition in adults. Journal of Phonetics, 27(4), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nodari, R., Celata, C., & Nagy, N. (2019). Socio-indexical phonetic features in the heritage language context: Voiceless stop aspiration in the Calabrian community in Toronto. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nycz, J. (2015). Second dialect acquisition: A sociophonetic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(11), 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, J. S., Au, T. K., & Jun, S.-A. (2010). Early childhood language memory in the speech perception of international adoptees. Journal of Child Language, 37(5), 1123–1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oxbury, R. & de Leeuw, E. (2020). Style-shifting in Multicultural London English in an all-girls homework club: A group of 11-year-old girls in Hackney change their pronunciations of the innovative Multicultural London English diphthongs according to the speech context. English Today, 36(3), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2007). L1 attrition features predicted by a neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. In Köpke, B., Schmid, M. S., Keijzer, M., & Dostert, S., eds., Language Attrition: A Theoretical Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passoni, E., Mehrabi, A., Levon, E., & de Leeuw, E. (2018). Bilingualism, pitch range and social factors: Preliminary results from sequential Japanese-English bilinguals. In Klessa, K., Bachan, J., Wagner, A., Karpiński, M., and Śledziński, D., eds., Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody. International Speech Communication Association, pp. 384–388. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-78.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797.Google ScholarPubMed
Sancier, M. L. & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G. (2004). Adolescents, young adults and the critical period: Two case studies from “Seven Up.” In Fought, C., ed., Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2011). Language Attrition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuerman, W. L., Meyer, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2015). Do we perceive others better than ourselves? A perceptual benefit for noise-vocoded speech produced by an average speaker. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0129731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheldon, A. & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3(3), 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockey, L. (1984). All in a flap: Long-term accommodation in phonology. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1984(46), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, C. K. & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterud Miller, D. (2019). Indigenous language revitalization on Puyallup territory. In Denham, K., ed., Northwest Voices: Language and Culture in the Pacific Northwest. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Baum, S. (2006). Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tice, M. & Woodley, M. (2012). Paguettes and bastries: Novice French learners show shifts in native phoneme boundaries. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report, 8, 72–75.Google Scholar
Tobin, S. J., Nam, H., & Fowler, C. A. (2017). Phonetic drift in Spanish-English bilinguals: Experiment and a self-organizing model. Journal of Phonetics, 65, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. (2022). Analysing the relationship between L2 production and different stages of L2 processing: Eye-tracking and acoustic evidence for a novel contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 91, 101134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. (2023). Phonetic development of an L2 vowel system and tandem drift in the L1: A residence abroad and L1 re-immersion study. Language and Speech, 66(3), 756–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, M. D., Best, C. T., Faber, A., & Levitt, A. G. (2014). Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 71(1), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulbrich, C. & Ordin, M. (2014). Can L2-English influence L1-German? The case of post-vocalic /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. (1999). Perception and production in early L1 acquisition and some theoretical implications. In Ohala, J. J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D., & Bailey, A. C., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. International Phonetic Association, pp. 1265–1268.Google Scholar
Yao, Y. & Chang, C. B. (2016). On the cognitive basis of contact-induced sound change: Vowel merger reversal in Shanghainese. Language, 92(2), 433–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zampini, M. L. (1998). The relationship between the production and perception of L2 Spanish stops. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 3(3), 85–100.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×