Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:51:12.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction:

Mix and Stir

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

By
Tracy C. Davis
Edited by
Tracy C. Davis  and
Paul Rae
Tracy C. Davis
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Paul Rae
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Tracy C. Davis outlines facets of tradecraft in theatre and performance studies (TaPS). Performances based on dramatic texts or social interactions can take into account distinctions between an aesthetic focus, case studies of performance history, and extrinsic cultural factors; each kind of research prioritizes particular kinds of information and has predominant methodologies for analysis. Additionally, Davis explicates the incompleteness and unrecoverability of performances in relation to different methodologies, and the salience of theory to different methodological traditions. Ultimately, combinations are likely in order to address the complexity of TaPS research.

Keywords

mixed methodstheoretical gapsepistemologiesunrecoverable performance
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies , pp. 1 - 36
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P. (2010). So Much Wasted: Hunger, Performance, and the Morbidity of Resistance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, P. (1998). Popular Culture and Performance in the Victorian City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balme, C. B. (2008). The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, G. J. (ca. 1806). Annotated Copy of Mrs. Inchbald’s Edition of The British Theatre. Archived in Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. (1997). 2nd edn. Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. (2011). Racial Innocence: Performing American Childhood from Slavery to Civil Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (2010). Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Trans. R. Savage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradway, T. (2021). ‘Queer Narrative Theory and the Relationality of Form’. PMLA, 136(5), 711–27.Google Scholar
Brand, D. (2001). A Map to the Door of No Return: Notes to Belonging. Toronto: Vintage.Google Scholar
Cahill, H., Aitken, V., & Hatton, C. (2019). ‘We Need to Talk about Theory: Rethinking the Theory/Practice Dichotomy in Pursuit of Rigour in Drama Research’. In Duffy, P., Hatton, C., & Sallis, R., eds., Drama Research Methods: Provocations of Practice. Leiden: Brill, pp. 183–99.Google Scholar
Campbell, P. N. (1982). ‘The Rhetoric of Theatre’. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 48(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, M. (1989). Places of Performance: The Semiotics of Theatre Architecture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, A. (2018). Building Character: The Art and Science of Casting. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Davis, T. C. (2004). ‘The Context Problem’. Theatre Survey, 45(2), 203–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, T. C., & Marx, P. W. (2021). ‘Introduction: On Critical Media History.’ In Davis, T. C. & Marx, P. W., eds., The Routledge Companion to Theatre and Performance Historiography. London: Routledge, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Escobar Varela, M. (2021). Theater as Data: Computational Journeys into Theater Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essin, C. (2021). Working Backstage: A Cultural History and Ethnography of Technical Theater Labor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fensham, R. (2021). Theory for Theatre Studies: Movement. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Furet, F. (2001). ‘From Narrative History to Problem-Oriented History’. In Roberts, G., ed., The History and Narrative Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 269–80.Google Scholar
Gajdoš, J. (2007). From Drama Technique to Scenology. Prague: Amu and Kant.Google Scholar
Gale, M. B., & Featherstone, A. (2011). ‘The Imperative of the Archive: Creative Archive Research’. In Kershaw, B. & Nicholson, H., eds., Research Methods in Theatre and Performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 16–40.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S. (1988). Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. (2018). ‘Research-Based Practice: Facilitating Transfer across Artistic, Scholarly, and Scientific Inquiries’. In Arlander, A., Barton, B., Dreyer-Lude, M., & Spatz, B., Performance as Research: Knowledge, Methods, Impact. London: Routledge, pp. 32–49.Google Scholar
Hartman, S. (2019). Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Riotous Black Girls, Troublesome Women, and Queer Radicals. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Heim, C. (2016). Audience as Performer: The Changing Role of Theatre Audiences in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2010). Theory Construction and Model-Building Skills. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Johnson, O. (2006). Absence and Memory in Colonial American Theatre: Fiorelli’s Plaster. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, O. (2018). Ruins: Classical Theatre and Broken Memory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, O. (2021). ‘The Size of All That’s Missing’. In Davis, T. C. & Marx, P. W., eds., The Routledge Companion to Theatre and Performance Historiography. London: Routledge, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
Kershaw, B., & Nicholson, H. (2011). ‘Introduction: Doing Methods Creatively’. In Kershaw, B. & Nicholson, H., eds., Research Methods in Theatre and Performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Knowles, R. (2004). Reading the Material Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McGlennon, F., & Rowenfeld, M. H. (1894). And Her Golden Hair Was Hanging Down Her Back. New York: Frank Tousey.Google Scholar
McKenzie, J., Roms, H., & Wee, C. J. W.-L. (2010). ‘Introduction: Performance in an Age of Globalization’. In McKenzie, J., Roms, H., & Wee, C. J. W.-L., eds., Contesting Performance: Global Sites of Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Moretti, F. (2005). Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Pascoe, J. (2011). The Sarah Siddons Audio Files: Romanticism and the Lost Voice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavis, P. (2003). Analyzing Performance: Theater, Dance, Film. Trans. D. Williams. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Peters, J. S. (2000). Theatre of the Book 1480–1880: Print, Text, and Performance in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prentki, T., & Preston, S. (2009). The Applied Theatre Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2014). ‘Critical Realism and Ethnography’. In Edwards, P. K., O’Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S., eds., Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 132–47.Google Scholar
Riley, S. R., & Hunter, L., eds. (2009). Mapping Landscapes for Performance as Research: Scholarly Acts and Creative Cartographies. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Santos, B. de S. (2018). The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, C. (2016). In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder-Young, D. (2020). Privileged Spectatorship: Theatrical Interventions in White Supremacy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Spatz, B. (2019). ‘Molecular Identities: Digital Archives and Decolonial Judaism in a Laboratory of Song’. Performance Research, 24(1), 66–79.Google Scholar
Trudell, S. A. (2020). ‘Shakespeare’s Notation: Writing Sound in Much Ado about Nothing’. PMLA, 135(2), 370–7.Google Scholar
Ubersfeld, A. (1999). Reading Theatre. Trans. F. Collins. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. (2006). ‘The Text/Performance Split across the Analytic/Continental Divide’. In Krasner, D. & Saltz, D. Z., eds., Staging Philosophy: Intersections of Theater, Performance, and Philosophy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
West, W. N. (2021). Common Understandings, Poetic Confusion: Playhouses and Playgoers in Elizabethan England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B. (2005). Print and the Poetics of Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B. (2010). Drama: Between Poetry and Performance. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction:
  • Edited by Tracy C. Davis, Northwestern University, Illinois, Paul Rae, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294904.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction:
  • Edited by Tracy C. Davis, Northwestern University, Illinois, Paul Rae, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294904.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction:
  • Edited by Tracy C. Davis, Northwestern University, Illinois, Paul Rae, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294904.001
Available formats
×