Casualwear and Its Birth in Japan

doi:10.1017/9781108862349.021

39 - Casualwear and Its Birth in Japan

from Part VI - Fashion Systems and Globalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2023

Toby Slade

Edited by

Christopher Breward ,

Beverly Lemire and

Giorgio Riello

Show author details

Christopher Breward: Affiliation:
National Museums Scotland
Beverly Lemire: Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Giorgio Riello: Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Casualness has perhaps always been present in clothing. Maybe even Julius Caesar’s loose-hung toga, sometimes read as a form of dandyism, was a move familiar in casualwear, changing the vocabulary of the sartorial norm to appear more relaxed, with something of an old-money swagger to it, to enact generational distinction, and to visually challenge the formality of a previous order. Casualness is not the same as informality or the unformed, indeed it is often as consciously put-together and structurally considered as formalwear, but it uses a vocabulary of relaxation of clothing rules, or total disregard for them to symbolize a change in values and generation. While acknowledging that this fashion move has been available and used throughout all clothing history and perhaps across all cultures, this chapter focuses on casualwear becoming a global industry and one of the dominating fashion meta-styles from the 1960s.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Global History of Fashion
From the Nineteenth Century to the Present
, pp. 1363 - 1393

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108862349.021 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Select Bibliography

Ajioka, Chiaki and Menzies, Jackie, Modern Boy, Modern Girl: Modernity in Japanese Art 1910–1935 (Sydney: Art Gallery of New South Wales, 1998).Google Scholar

Carter, Michael, ‘Hand in Glove: Respectability and Dress’. http://michaelcarter.artology.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Hand-in-Glove-Respectability-Dress.pdf (2020) (accessed 15 July 2021).Google Scholar

Fashion in Japan 1945–2020 (Tokyo: National Art Center Tokyo, 2021).Google Scholar

Flügel, John, The Psychology of Clothes (London: Hogarth Press, 1930).Google Scholar

Gordon, Andrew, Fabricating Consumers: The Sewing Machine in Modern Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Hayashida, Teruyoshi, Kurosu, Toshiyuki, and Hasegawa, Hajime, Take Ivy (New York: PowerHouse, 2010).Google Scholar

Martin, Richard and Koda, Harold, Infra-Apparel (New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1993).Google Scholar

Marx, W. David, Ametora: How Japan Saved American Style (New York: Basic Books, 2015).Google Scholar

Mears, David (ed.), Ivy Style: Radical Conformists (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Traganou, Jilly and Kuroishi, Izumi, Design and Disaster: Kon Wajirō’s Modernologio (New York: Parsons the New School, 2014).Google Scholar