The U.S. Corporate Economy in the Twentieth Century

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521553087.016

15 - The U.S. Corporate Economy in the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Louis Galambos

Edited by

Stanley L. Engerman and

Robert E. Gallman

Show author details

Louis Galambos: Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Stanley L. Engerman: Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Robert E. Gallman: Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Book contents

Get access

Summary

During the past century America’s business system has experienced three dramatic transformations. The first, which climaxed in the last years of the nineteenth and early years of the twentieth centuries and is usually labeled “The Great Merger Movement,” featured a shift to the corporate form of organization and the development of a high degree of concentration in most sectors of the industrial economy. A second, less drastic, wave of change took place in the 1940s and 1950s, when the multidivisional, decentralized firm operating in worldwide markets became the norm for America’s leading enterprises. We are currently experiencing the third and most formidable of these three transformations, as leading U.S. companies – many of them now in the service sector – reorganize and develop appropriate strategies for an international economy characterized by intense competition and seemingly unending pressures to innovate.

All three of these transitions have been successful, and the U.S. corporate economy has, on balance, succeeded in providing society with the goods, services, jobs, and economic opportunities that the American people wanted. The key to that success has been the ability of corporate enterprise to adapt to new conditions in its external environment and to reshape its personnel, organizations, and operations so as to remain innovative over the long term.

The single most important factor accounting for the ability to adapt and innovate has been the manner in which successful U.S. companies have blended corporate resources with professional expertise. This combination has taken place in cultural and institutional settings that have fostered risk-taking and creative change.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Economic History of the United States , pp. 927 - 968

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521553087.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownlee, W. Elliot, ed., Funding the Modern American State, 1941–1995: The Rise and Fall of the Era of Easy Finance (New York, 1996).Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, MA, 1977)..Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred D. in The Visible Hand and in his earlier account of Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, MA, 1962).Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred D., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, MA, 1990)Google Scholar

Cohen, Stephen S. and Zysman, John, Economic Report of the President, February 1998Google Scholar

Cohen, Stephen S. and Zysman, John, Manufacturing Mattery: The Myth of the Post-Industrial Economy (New York, 1987).Google Scholar

Collins, Robert, The Business Response to Keynes, 1929–1964 (New York, 1981)Google Scholar

Eichner, Alfred S., The Emergence of Oligopoly: Sugar Refining as a Case Study (Baltimore, 1969)Google Scholar

Fagen, M. D., ed., A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell System: The Early Years (1875–1925) (Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1975)Google Scholar

Fuchs, Victor R., The Service Economy (New York, 1968)Google Scholar

Galambos, Louis and Sturchio, Jeffrey L., “The Transformation of the Pharmaceutical Industry in the Twentieth Century,” in Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique, eds., Science in the Twentieth Century (Amsterdam, 1997).Google Scholar

Galambos, Louis, with Sewell, Jane Eliot, Networks of Innovation: Vaccine Development at Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and Mulford, 1895–1995 (New York, 1995)Google Scholar

Gallman, Robert E., “The Pace and Pattern of American Economic Gŕowth,” in Davis, Lance E. et al., American Economic Growth: An Economist’s History of the United States (New York, 1972).Google Scholar

Graham, Margaret B. W. and Pruitt, Bettye H., R&D for Industry: A Century of Technical Innovation at Alcoa (New York, 1990)Google Scholar

Graham, Margaret B. W., RCA & the VideoDisc: The Business of Research (New York, 1986).Google Scholar

Hays, Samuel P., Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985 (New York, 1987).CrossRef Google Scholar

Hidy, Ralph W. and Hidy, Muriel E., Pioneering in Big Business, 1882–1911: History of Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) (New York, 1955)Google Scholar

Hounshell, David A. and Smith, John Kenly Jr., Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980 (New York, 1988).Google Scholar

Hounshell, David A., “The Evolution of Industrial Research in the United States,” in Rosenbloom, Richard S. and Spencer, William J., eds., Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research at the End of an Era (Boston, 1996)Google Scholar

Hughes, Thomas P., Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930 (Baltimore, 1988)Google Scholar

,International Institute for Management Development, The World Competitiveness Yearbook, 1997 (Lausanne, 1997).

Kendrick, John W., Productivity Trends in the United States (Princeton, 1961)Google Scholar

Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Insider Lending: Banks, Personal Connections, and Economic Development in Industrial New England (New York, 1994).CrossRef Google Scholar

Lamoreaux, Naomi R., The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904 (New York, 1985).CrossRef Google Scholar

Letwin, William, Law and Economic Policy in America: The Evolution of the Sherman Antitrust Act (New York, 1965).Google Scholar

McCurdy, Charles W., “The Knight Sugar Decision of 1895 and the Modernization of American Corporate Law, 1869–1903,” Business History Review 53 (1979).CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R., ed., National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (New York, 1993).Google Scholar

Reich, Leonard S., The Making of American Industrial Research: Science and Business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926 (New York, 1985).Google Scholar

Roy, William G., The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America (Princeton, 1997)Google Scholar

Scherer, F. M. and Ross, David, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Boston, 1990).Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York, 1942).Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A., The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Cambridge, MA, 1934)Google Scholar

Scranton, Philip, Endless Novelty: Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865–1925 (Princeton, 1997).Google Scholar

Smith, George David, From Monopoly to Competition: The Transformations of Alcoa, 1888–1986 (New York, 1988).Google Scholar

Tedlow, Richard S., New and Improved: The Story of Mass Marketing in America (New York, 1990).Google Scholar

Thorelli, Hans B., The Federal Antitrust Policy: Origination of an American Tradition (Baltimore, 1955)Google Scholar

Williamson, Jeffrey G. and Linden, Peter H., American Inequality: A Macroeconomic History (New York, 1980).Google Scholar

Zunz, Olivier, Making America Corporate, 1870–1920 (Chicago, 1990).Google Scholar

Book contents

15 - The U.S. Corporate Economy in the Twentieth Century

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive