Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:28:04.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Neo-Latin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

By
Yasmin Haskell
Edited by
Roy Gibson  and
Christopher Whitton
Roy Gibson
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Christopher Whitton
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

This chapter takes a snapshot of the field of Neo-Latin with a view to opening it up to curious classical Latinists. What sorts of texts do neo-Latinists study? How do their concerns and approaches differ from those of mainstream classicists and modern linguists? What is the disciplinary position of Neo-Latin across Europe, the United Kingdom and the Americas? Is it forever condemned to be the handmaiden of intellectual history, the history of scholarship, religion, rhetoric, science and medicine, or do neo-Latin authors and texts merit attention for their Latinity? This chapter describes the rise and fall of the neo-Latin idiom from the Italian Renaissance through to the present, with attention to questions of authority, alterity, plurilingualism, genre hybridity and the distinctive modalities of neo-Latin intertextuality. It confronts the bugbear of neo-Latin poetry’s supposed lack of authenticity from a history of emotions perspective. Finally, the problem of a Neo-Latin ‘canon’ is raised in the context of indicating authors suitable for teaching to Classics undergraduates, as well as prospects for the future digital dissemination of neo-Latin editions and commentaries.

Keywords

Neo-Latinhumanismintertextualitycanongenrevernacularhistory of emotionsliving LatinGirolamo FracastoroMichael MarullusLatin EnlightenmentJesuit Latin
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature , pp. 334 - 394
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abad, Diego José (1974) Poema heróico (Cesena, 1780) (trans. B. F. Valenzuela), Mexico City.Google Scholar
Agbamu, S. (2019) ‘The Arco dei Fileni: a fascist reading of Sallust’s Bellum Iugurthinum’, Classical Receptions Journal 11: 157–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alciati, (1531) Emblematum libellus, Augsburg.Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond (1751) ‘Discourse Préliminaire’, Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, vol. 1, Paris.Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond (1767) ‘Sur l’harmonie des langues, et en particulier sur celle qu’on croit sentir dans les langues mortes; et à cette occasion sur la latinité des modernes’, Mélanges v 523–68. Reprinted in Œuvres de d’Alembert, iv.1 (Paris, 1822) 11–28. http://obvil.sorbonne-universite.fr/corpus/critique/alembert_apologie-etude/.Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond (2009) ‘Preliminary Discourse’ (trans. R. N. Schwab and W. E. Rex), The Encyclopedia of Diderot and d’Alembert Collaborative Translation Project, Ann Arbor. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0001.083. Trans. of d’Alembert, 1751.Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond and Mallet, Edme-François (2003) ‘College [abridged]’, The Encyclopedia of Diderot and d’Alembert Collaborative Translation Project (trans. by N. S. Hoyt and T. Cassirer), Ann Arbor. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/did/did2222.0000.144/.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Ludovico (2018) Latin Poetry (ed. Looney, D and Possanza, M), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Backus, I. (2014) ‘Patristics’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 733–45.Google Scholar
Backus, I., ed. (1997) The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists, 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar
Barea, J. P. (2013) ‘Neo-Latin drama in Spain, Portugal and Latin America’, in Bloemendal, and Norland, 2013, 545–631.Google Scholar
Bejczy, I. (2001) Erasmus and the Middle Ages: The Historical Consciousness of a Christian Humanist, Leiden.Google Scholar
du Bellay, J. (1558) Poematum libri quatuor, Paris.Google Scholar
Benci, Francesco ([1591] 1592) Quinque martyres, [Venice] Rome.Google Scholar
Benci, Francesco (1591) Carminum libri quatuor Eiusdem Ergastus et Philotus dramata, Ingolstadt.Google Scholar
Berlincourt, V. (2013) ‘Commenting on Claudian’s “political poems”, 1612/1650’, in Enenkel, K. A. E., ed., Transformations of the Classics via Early Modern Commentaries (Leiden), 125–50.Google Scholar
Bertiau, C. (2017) ‘Neo-Latin literature in nineteenth-century Europe: an overview’, History of European Ideas 43: 416–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertiau, C. and Sacré, D. (2020) Le latin et la littérature néo-latine au XIXe siècle: pratiques et represéntations, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Best, T. W. (1975) Jacob Bidermann, New York.Google Scholar
Bianco, L. A. (1996) ‘Latin et langues vivantes dans l’Encyclopédie’, Recherches sur Diderot et sur l’Encyclopédie 20: 141–7.Google Scholar
Bicknell, T. (1996) ‘Calamus ense potentior est: Walter Savage Landor’s poetic war of words’, Romanticism on the Net 4. http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/005730ar.Google Scholar
Bidermann, Jacob (1630) Heroum epistolae, Antwerp.Google Scholar
Bidermann, Jacob (1634) Silvulae hendecasyllaborum, Rome.Google Scholar
Bidermann, Jacob (1638) Heroidum epistulae, Antwerp.Google Scholar
Bidermann, Jacob (1666) Ludi theatrales sacri, Munich.Google Scholar
Bidermann, Jacob (1975) Cenodoxus (ed. and trans. D. G. Dyer and C. Longrigg), Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Binns, J. (1974) The Latin Poetry of English Poets, London and Boston.Google Scholar
Binns, J. (1990) Intellectual Culture in Elizabethan and Jacobean England: The Latin Writings of the Age, Leeds.Google Scholar
Bisselius, Johannes (2013) Deliciae veris – Frühlingsfreuden. Lateinischer Text, Übersetzung, Einführungen und Kommentar (ed. Claren, L, Eickmeyer, J, Kühlmann, W and Wiegand, H), Berlin.Google Scholar
Blair, A. (2014) ‘North America’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 833–48.Google Scholar
Bloemendal, J., Ford, P. and Fantazzi, C., eds. (2014a) Brill’s Companion to the Neo-Latin World: Micropaedia, Leiden.Google Scholar
Bloemendal, J., Ford, P. and Fantazzi, C. eds. (2014b) Brill’s Companion to the Neo-Latin World: Macropaedia, Leiden.Google Scholar
Bloemendal, J. and Norland, H. B., eds. (2013) Neo-Latin Drama and Theatre in Early Modern Europe, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloemendal, J. and Verbeke, D., eds. (2015) Bilingual Europe: Latin and Vernacular Cultures – Examples of Bilingualism and Multilingualism ca. 1300–1800, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonincontrius, Laurentius (1999) De rebus naturalibus et divinis. Zwei Lehrgedichte an Lorenzo de’ Medici und Ferdinand von Aragonien (ed. Heilen, S), Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bontinck, F. (1962) La lutte autour de la liturgie chinoise aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles, Louvain.Google Scholar
Botley, P. (2010) Learning Greek in Western Europe, 1396–1529: Grammars, Dictionaries and Student Texts, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Botley, P. (2012) ‘Greek epistolography in fifteenth-century Italy’, in Glucker, J and Burnett, C, eds., Greek into Latin: From Antiquity until the Nineteenth Century (London), 187–205.Google Scholar
Botley, P. and van Miert, D., eds. (2012) The Correspondence of Joseph Scaliger (1540–1609), 8 vols., Geneva.Google Scholar
Bradner, L. (1940) Musae Anglicanae: A History of Anglo-Latin Poetry, 1500–1925, London.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2010) The Return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burkard, T., ed. (2006) Jacob Balde im kulturellen Kontext seiner Epoche: Zur 400. Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages, Regensburg.Google Scholar
Burke, P. (1991) ‘Heu domine, adsunt Turcae: a sketch for a social history of post-medieval Latin’, in Burke, P. and Porter, R., eds., Language, Self and Society: A Social History of Language (Oxford), 23–50.Google Scholar
Burke, P. (2007) ‘Translations into Latin in early modern Europe’, in Burke, P. and Po-Chia Hsia, R., eds., Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, C. and Mann, N., eds. (2005) Britannia Latina: Latin in the Culture of Great Britain from the Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century, London.Google Scholar
Bury, E., ed. (2005) Tous vos gens à Latin: le latin, langue savante, langue mondaine (XIVe–XVIIe siècles), Geneva.Google Scholar
Cabrera, F. J. (2012) Quetzalcóatl y el paraiso de Tamoanchan: dos poemas neolatinos, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Cabrera, F. J. (2016) Exaltación guadalupana = Laus guadalupensis: tradición y recepción clásico-moderna, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Campanelli, M. (2008) ‘Settecento Latino ii’, L’Ellisse. Studi storici di letteratura italiana 3: 85–110.Google Scholar
Campanelli, M. (2013) ‘Settecento Latino iii. L’inflazione dei poeti e il monte di Testaccio in un’epistola di Contuccio Contucci’, L’Ellisse. Studi storici di letteratura italiana 8: 159–95.Google Scholar
Campanelli, M. (2014) ‘Settecento Latino iv. Due frammenti della preistoria poetica di G. B. Casti’, L’Ellisse. Studi storici di letteratura italiana 9: 101–14.Google Scholar
Campanelli, M. and Ottaviani, A. (2007) ‘Settecento Latino i’, L’Ellisse. Studi storici di letteratura italiana 2: 99–133.Google Scholar
Campanelli, M. and Muecke, F., eds. (2017) The Invention of Rome: Biondo Flavio’s Roma triumphans and Its Worlds, Geneva.Google Scholar
Carmina illustrium poetarum Italorum (1719–26), 11 vols., Florence.Google Scholar
Carrara, Ubertino, SJ (2004) Columbus. Carmen epicum (ed. and trans. F. Schaffenrath), Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Castor, G. and Cave, T. (1984) Neo-Latin and the Vernacular in Renaissance France, Oxford.Google Scholar
Champion, M., Garrod, R., Haskell, Y. and Ruys, J. (2016) ‘But were they talking about the emotions? Affectus, affectio and the history of emotions’, Rivista storica italiana 128: 521–53.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. and Hosington, B., eds. (2000) Elizabeth Jane Weston: Collected Writings, Toronto.Google Scholar
Coppini, D. (1990) Antonius Panormita. Hermaphroditus, Rome.Google Scholar
Coppini, D (2009) ‘The comic and the obscene in the Latin epigrams of the early fifteenth century’, in de Beer, S., Enenkel, K. A. E. and Rijser, D., eds., The Neo-Latin Epigram: A Learned and Witty Genre (Louvain), 83–102.Google Scholar
Cortesi, M., ed. (2006) ‘Editiones principes’ delle opere dei padri greci e latini, Florence.Google Scholar
Cottier, J.F. and Westra, H. (2015) ‘North America’, in Knight, and Tilg, 2015, 541–56.Google Scholar
Couplet, Philippe, SJ, Herdtrich, Christian SJ, Intorcetta, Prospero SJ and Rougemont, Francis SJ, eds. (1687) Confucius Sinarum philosophus, sive, Scientia Sinensis latine exposita, Paris.Google Scholar
D’Amico, J.F. (1983) Renaissance Humanism in Papal Rome: Humanists and Churchmen on the Eve of the Reformation, Baltimore.Google Scholar
de la Cerda, Juan Luis, SJ, ed. (1608) Bucolica et Georgica argumentis: explicationibus notis illustrati, Lyon.Google Scholar
de la Cerda, Juan Luis (1612) P. Virgilii Maronis Aeneidos sex libri priores: argumentis, explicationibus notis illustrati, Lyon.Google Scholar
de la Cerda, Juan Luis (1617) P. Virgilii Maronis Aeneidos libri sex posteriores: argumentis, explicationibus notis illustrati, Lyon.Google Scholar
De Landtsheer, J. (1998) ‘Justus Lipsius (1547–1606) and Lucius Annaeus Seneca’, Annales Societatis litterarum humaniorum regiae Upsaliensis, 217–38.Google Scholar
De Landtsheer, J. (2013) ‘Annotating Tacitus: the case of Justus Lipsius’, in Enenkel, K., ed., Transformations of the Classics via Early Modern Commentaries (Leiden) 279–326.Google Scholar
de Sande, Duarte (2012) Japanese Travellers in Sixteenth-Century Europe: A Dialogue Concerning the Mission of the Japanese Ambassadors to the Roman Curia (1590) (ed. and trans. J. F. Moran and D. Massarella), London.Google Scholar
De Smet, I. (1996) Menippean Satire in the Republic of Letters 1581–1655, Geneva.Google Scholar
De Sutter, N. (2019a) ‘A modern myth in classical dress: the Titanic disaster in contemporary Latin verse’, New Voices in Classical Reception Studies 13.Google Scholar
De Sutter, N. (2019b) ‘Through Vergil’s eyes: the Certamen Hoeufftianum and the revival of figures from antiquity in the Latin poetry of the First World War’, Futuro Classico 5: 45–91.Google Scholar
Delitiae C poetarum Gallorum coll. Ranutius Gherus (1609), 3 vols., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Delitiae CC Italorum Poetarum coll. Ranutius Gherus [Ianus Gruterus] (1608), 2 vols., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Delitiae poetarum Germanorum coll. A.F.G.C. (1612), 6 vols., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Delitiae poetarum Hungaricorum … à Ioh. Philippo Pareo (1619), Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Delitiae poetarum Scotorum huius aevi illustrium (1637), 2 vols., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
DellaNeva, J., ed. (2007) Ciceronian Controversies. English Translation by Brian Duvick, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Deneire, T. (2014a) ‘Neo-Latin and the vernacular: prose’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 275–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneire, T., ed. (2014b) Dynamics of Neo-Latin and the Vernacular: Language and Poetics, Translation and Transfer, Leiden.Google Scholar
Deraedt, F. (2016) ‘Post Bruxellensem ictum tromocraticum’, Melissa 191: 1–3.Google Scholar
Dufresnoy, Charles-Alphonse (2005) De arte graphica (ed. with introductory essays and commentary by Allen, C, Haskell, Y and Muecke, F), Geneva.Google Scholar
Eickmeyer, J. (2012) Der jesuitische Heroidenbrief. Zur Christianisierung und Kontextualiserung einer antiken Gattung in der frühen Neuzeit, Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Endres, C. (1981) Johannes Secundus: The Latin Love Elegy in the Renaissance, Hamden, CT.Google Scholar
Enenkel, K. A. E. (2014) ‘Neo-Latin erotic and pornographic literature’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 487–501.Google Scholar
Enenkel, K. A. E. and de Jong, J. L., eds. (2019) Artes apodemicae and Early Modern Travel Culture, 1550–1700, Leiden.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius (1986) ‘The Ciceronian: a dialogue on the ideal style’ (trans. B. I. Knott), in Collected Works of Erasmus, vol. 28 (Toronto), 323–448.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius (1993) Poems (trans. C. H. Miller, ed. and annotated H. Vredeveld), = Collected Works of Erasmus, vol. 85, Toronto.Google Scholar
Esseiva, Pierre (1870) Urania: Carmen didascalicum, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fantazzi, C. (2014) ‘Imitation, emulation, Ciceronianism, anti-Ciceronianism’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 141–53.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1977) ‘Studio e uso del latino nella scuola fascista’, in Matrici culturali del Fascismo (Bari), 209–24.Google Scholar
Feile Tomes, M. (2015a) ‘News of a hitherto unknown neo-Latin Columbus epic – part i: José Manuel Peramás’s De invento novo orbe inductoque illuc Christi sacrificio (1777)’, IJCT 22: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feile Tomes, M. (2015b) ‘News of a hitherto unknown neo-Latin Columbus epic – part ii: José Manuel Peramás’s De invento novo orbe inductoque illuc Christi sacrificio (1777)’, IJCT 22: 223–57.Google Scholar
Feile Tomes, M. (2015c) ‘Further points on Peramás: an erratum and two addenda’, IJCT 22: 383–9.Google Scholar
Fera, V. (2017) Pascoli e le vie della tradizione: atti del convegno internazionale di studi: Messina, 3–5 dicembre 2012, Messina.Google Scholar
Fera, V., Gionta, D. and Morabito, E., eds. (2006) La poesia latina nell’area dello Stretto fra Ottocento e Novecento, Messina.Google Scholar
Ferri, G. (1771) Pro linguae latinae usu epistolae adversus Alambertium, Faenza.Google Scholar
Föcking, M. and Müller, G. M., eds. (2007) Abgrenzung und Synthese. Lateinische Dichtung und volkssprachliche Traditionen in Renaissance und Barock, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Folengo, T. (1997) Baldo (ed. with critical text, trans. and extensive notes, index and glossary by Chiesa, M.), Turin.Google Scholar
Folengo, Teofilo (2007) Baldus (ed. and trans. A. E. Mullaney), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2015) Joannes Burmeister: Aulularia and Other Inversions of Plautus, Leuven.Google Scholar
Ford, P. (1997) Ronsard’s Hymnes: A Literary and Iconographical Study, Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
Ford, P. (2013) The Judgment of Palaemon: The Contest Between Neo-Latin and Vernacular Poetry in Renaissance France, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordónski, K. and Urbánski, P., eds. (2008) Casimir Britannicus: English Translations, Paraphrases, and Emulations of the Poetry of Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski. Revised and expanded edn, London.Google Scholar
Fracastoro, G. (2013) Latin Poetry (ed. Gardner, J.), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fullenwider, H. F. (1984) ‘Die Kritik der deutschen Jesuiten an dem lakonischen Stil des Justus Lipsius im Zusammenhang der jesuitischen Argutia-Bewegung’, Rhetorica 2: 55–62.Google Scholar
Fúrlong Cárdiff, G., ed. (1952) José Manuel Peramás y su Diario del destierro, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Gier, H. ed. (2005) Jakob Bidermann und sein ‘Cenodoxus’: Der bedeutendste Dramatiker aus dem Jesuitenorden und sein erfolgreichstes Stück, Regensburg.Google Scholar
Giglioni, G. (2015) ‘Philosophy’, in Knight, and Tilg, 2015, 249–62.Google Scholar
Gilmore, J. (2005) ‘The British empire and the neo-Latin tradition: the case of Francis Williams’, in Goff, B. E., ed., Classics and Colonialism (London), 92–106.Google Scholar
Gilmore, J. (2009) ‘Aethiopissae: the classical tradition, neo-Latin verse and images of race in George Herbert and Vincent Bourne’, Classical Receptions Journal 1: 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, J. (2010) ‘Sub herili venditur hasta: an early eighteenth-century justification of the slave trade by a colonial poet’, in Haskell, and Ruys, 2010, 221–39.Google Scholar
Gilmore, J. (2011) ‘John Barclay’s “Camella” poems: ideas of race, beauty and ugliness in Renaissance Latin verse’, in Orrells, D, Bhambra, G. K and Roynon, T, eds., African Athena: New Agendas (Oxford), 277–92.Google Scholar
Giustiniani, V. (1979) Neulateinische Dichtung in Italien 1850–1950: Ein unerforschtes Kapitel italienischer Literatur- und Geistesgeschichte, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (1991) ‘Pontano’s use of the didactic genre: rhetoric, irony and the manipulation of Lucretius in Urania’, Renaissance Studies 5: 250–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golvers, N. (2015) ‘Asia’, in Knight, and Tilg, 2015, 557–73.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. T. (1983–93) Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Green, R. P. H. (2014) ‘Poetic psalm paraphrases’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 461–9.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S. (2011) The Swerve: How the Renaissance Began, New York.Google Scholar
Gwynne, P. (2016) ‘Francesco Benci and the origins of Jesuit neo-Latin epic’, in Maryks, R., ed., Jesuit Distinctiveness (Leiden), 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, P. (2018) Francesco Benci’s Quinque martyres: Introduction, Translation and Commentary, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, P. and Schirg, B., eds. (2018) The Economics of Poetry: The Efficient Production of Neo-Latin Verse, 1400–1720, Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Brussels, New York and Vienna.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadas, D., Manuwald, G. and Nicholas, L. R., eds. (2020) An Anthology of European Neo-Latin Literature, London.Google Scholar
Hale, J. K. (1997) Milton’s Languages: The Impact of Multilingualism on Style, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hale, J. K. (1998) John Milton, Latin Writings: A Selection, Assen.Google Scholar
Hale, J. K. (2005) Milton’s Cambridge Latin: Performing in the Genres 1625–1632, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. (2001) ‘The lost continent: neo-Latin literature and the rise of modern European literatures’, HLB 12: 1–92.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R., Prosperi, V. and Zucca, D., eds. (2020) Lucretius Poet and Philosopher: Background and Fortunes of De rerum natura, Berlin.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (1998a) ‘The masculine muse: form and content in the Latin didactic poetry of Palingenius and Bruno’, in Atherton, C., ed., Form and Content in Didactic Poetry (Bari), 117–44.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (1998b) ‘Renaissance Latin didactic poetry on the stars: wonder, myth, and science’, Renaissance Studies 12: 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, Y. (1998c) ‘The Tristia of a Greek refugee: Michael Marullus and the politics of Latin subjectivity after the fall of Constantinople (1453)’, PCPhS 44: 110–36.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2001) ‘The Columbus paradigm – or complex? – in Neo-Latin studies’, SO 76: 47–51.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2003) Loyola’s Bees: Ideology and Industry in Jesuit Latin Didactic Poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2009) ‘Back to the stone age: virtual Roman realities in Victorian Britain’, in Hummel, P. C., ed., Epilanguages: Beyond Idioms and Languages (Paris), 129–47.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2010) ‘Practicing what they preach? Virgil and the Jesuits’, in Farrell, J. and Putnam, M., eds., A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and Its Tradition (Chichester), 203–16.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2011) ‘Early anger management: Seneca, Ovid, and Lieven De Meyere’s De ira libri tres (Antwerp, 1694)’, IJCT 18: 136–65.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2013a) Prescribing Ovid: The Latin Works and Networks of the Enlightened Doctor Heerkens, London.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2013b) ‘Child murder and child’s play: the emotions of children in Jakob Bidermann’s epic on the massacre of the innocents (Herodiados libri iii, 1622)’, IJCT 20: 83‒100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2014) ‘The classification of neo-Latin didactic poetry from the fifteenth to nineteenth centuries’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 437–48.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2015) ‘Arts and games of love: genre, gender and friendship in eighteenth-century Jesuit poetry’, in Broomhall, S., ed., Ordering Emotions in Europe, 1100–1800 (Leiden), 225–44.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2016) ‘Suppressed emotions: the heroic Tristia of Portuguese (ex-)Jesuit, Emanuel de Azevedo’, Journal of Jesuit Studies 3: 42–60.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2017) ‘Conjuring with the Classics: neo-Latin poets and their pagan familiars’, in Moul, 2017, 17–34.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2019a) ‘Latinitas Jesu: neo-Latin writing and the literary-emotional communities of the Old Society of Jesus’, in Županov, I. G., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Jesuits (Oxford), 553–74.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. (2019b) ‘Performing the passions: Pierre Brumoy’s De motibus animi between dramatic and didactic poetry’, in Haskell, Y and Garrod, R, eds., Changing Hearts: Performing Jesuit Emotions between Europe, Asia and the Americas (Leiden), 43–62.Google Scholar
Haskell, Y. and Ruys, J. F., eds. (2010) Latinity and Alterity in the Early Modern Period, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
Hass, T. A. and Ramminger, J., eds. (2010) Latin and the Vernaculars in Early Modern Europe (= Renæssanceforum 6), www.njrs.dk.Google Scholar
Haugen, K. (2014) ‘Joseph Scaliger’s letters: collaborator, teacher, impresario’, History of Universities 18: 105–47.Google Scholar
Heerkens, G. N. (1790) De valetudine literatorum, 2nd expanded edn, Groningen.Google Scholar
Helander, H. (2004) Neo-Latin Literature in Sweden in the Period 1620–1720: Stylistics, Vocabulary and Characteristic Ideas, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Herbert, G. (2015) Complete Poetry (ed. and trans. J. Drury and V. Moul), London.Google Scholar
Hess, G. (1976) ‘Spectator-Lector-Actor. Zum Publikum von Jacob Bidermanns Cenodoxus’, Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur 1: 30–106.Google Scholar
Hess, G. (2000) ‘Der Mord auff dem Papier oder: Herodes in Augsburg’, in Hess, G., ed., Der Tod des Seneca: Studien zur Kunst der Imagination in Texten und Bildern des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts (Regensburg), 145–65. Reprinted in Gier 2005, 169–89.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (2016) De mirabilibus Pecci carmen (ed. Luggin, J), Hildesheim, Zürich and New York.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. (1994) ‘Adveniat tandem Typhis, qui detegat orbes: Columbus in neo-Latin epic poetry (16th–18th centuries)’, in Haase, W. and Meyer, R., eds., The Classical Tradition and the Americas. Vol. 1: European Images of the Classical Tradition and the Americas (Berlin), 420–656.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. and Manuwald, G., eds. (2013) Neo-Latin Poetry in the British Isles, London.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T., Manuwald, G. and Nicholas, L. R., eds. (2020) An Anthology of British Neo-Latin Literature, London.Google Scholar
IJsewijn, J. (1990) ‘Poetry in a Roman garden: the Coryciana’, in Godman, P. and Murray, O., eds., Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition: Essays in Medieval and Renaissance Literature (Oxford), 211–31.Google Scholar
IJsewijn, J. (1990–8) Companion to Neo-Latin Studies. With Sacré, D., 2 vols., Leuven.Google Scholar
IJsewijn, J. Imago primi saeculi Societatis Jesu (1640), Antwerp.Google Scholar
Isebaert, L. and Smeesters, A., eds. (2013) Poésie latine à haute voix (1500–1700), Turnhout.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalabert, R. (2015) ‘Les vers latins en France au xixe siècle’, 3 vols., unpublished PhD dissertation, Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. (1983) ‘Isotta Nogarola: women humanists – education for what?’, History of Education 12: 231–44.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. (1985) ‘O decus Italiae virgo, or the myth of the learned lady in the Renaissance’, The Historical Journal 28: 799–819.Google Scholar
Jovanović, N., Luggin, J., Špoljarić, L. and Šubarić, L., eds. (2018) Neo-Latin Contexts in Croatia and Tyrol: Challenges, Prospects, Case Studies, Vienna, Cologne and Weimar.Google Scholar
Kaiser, L. (1984) Early American Latin Verse 1625–1825: An Anthology, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kajanto, I. (2005) ‘Spinoza’s Latinity’, in Akkerman, F and Steenbakkers, P, eds., Spinoza to the Letter: Studies in Words, Texts and Books (Leiden), 35–54.Google Scholar
Kallendorf, C. (2007) The Other Virgil: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Early Modern Culture, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kerson, A. L. (1991) ‘Diego José Abad, Dissertatio Ludicro-Seria’, HumLov 40: 357–422.Google Scholar
Klecker, E. (2002) ‘Ein Missionar auf den Spuren des Aeneas. Die Paciecis des Bartholomaeus Pereira SJ (Coimbra 1640)’, in Briesemeister, D. and Schönberger, A., eds., De litteris neolatinis in America meridionali, Portugallia, Hispania, Italia cultis (Frankfurt), 99–112.Google Scholar
Knight, S. and Tilg, S., eds. (2015) The Oxford Handbook of Neo-Latin, Oxford.Google Scholar
Korenjak, M. (2015) ‘Short mythological epic in neo-Latin literature’, in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S., eds., Brill’s Companion to the Greek and Latin Epyllion and Its Reception (Leiden), 519–36.Google Scholar
Korenjak, M., Schaffenrath, F., Šubarić, L. and Töchterle, K., eds. (2012) Tyrolis Latina: Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur in Tirol, 2 vols., Vienna.Google Scholar
Krüssel, H. (2011–15) Napoleo Latinitate vestitus: Napoleon Bonaparte in lateinischen Dichtungen vom Ende des 18. bis zum Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts, 2 vols., Hildesheim, Zürich and New York.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2002) ‘Juan Luis de la Cerda and the predicament of commentary’, in Gibson, R. K and Shuttleworth Kraus, C. S, eds., The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory (Leiden), 171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, A. (2004) ‘Selenopolitanus: Diego José Abad, Latin, and Mexican identity’, StudUmanistPiceni 24: 231–7.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2010) ‘Latin in Cuauhtémoc’s shadow: humanism and the politics of language in Mexico after the conquest’, in Haskell, and Ruys, 2010, 169–200.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2014) ‘Latin in Latin America’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 821–32.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2015) ‘Colonial Spanish America and Brazil’, in Knight, and Tilg, 2015, 525–40.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2017) ‘A mirror for Mexican princes: reconsidering the context and Latin source for the Nahuatl translation of Aesop’s Fables’, in Taylor, B. and Coroleu, A., eds., Brief Forms in Medieval and Renaissance Hispanic Literature (Newcastle), 132–67.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2019) ‘American philological associations: Latin and Amerindian languages’, TAPhA 149: 117–41.Google Scholar
Lamers, H. (2015) Greece Reinvented: Transformations of Byzantine Hellenism in Renaissance Italy, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamers, H., ed. (2018) ‘Constructing Hellenism: studies on the history of Greek learning in early modern Europe’, introduction to special issue of IJCT 25.3: 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamers, H. and Reitz-Joosse, B. (2015) ‘Lingua lictoria: the Latin literature of Italian fascism’, Classical Receptions Journal 8: 1–37.Google Scholar
Lamers, H. and Reitz-Joosse, B. (2016) The Codex Fori Mussolini: A Latin Text of Italian Fascism, London.Google Scholar
Lamers, H., Reitz-Joosse, B. and Sacré, D. (2014) ‘Neo-Latin literature – Italy: fascism (1922–1943)’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014a, 1091–5.Google Scholar
Lamers, H., Reitz-Joosse, B. and Sanzotta, V., eds. (2019) Studies in the Latin Literature and Epigraphy of Italian Fascism, Leuven.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2017) Jakob Baldes ‘Expeditio Polemico-Poetica’ (1664). Eine satirische Verteidigung der lateinischen und neulateinischen Literatur. Einführung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar, Berlin.Google Scholar
Leochaus [Leech], Johannes (1630) Musae priores, London.Google Scholar
Lepri, V. (2015) ‘Hic liber libenter legitur in Polonia: mapping the popularity of the Zodiacus Vitae between the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’, Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce 59: 67–93.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1990) Poetry and Prose in the Sixteenth Century, Oxford.Google Scholar
Longo, S. G. (2004) Savoir de la nature et poésie des choses: Lucrèce et Epicure à la Renaissance italienne, Paris.Google Scholar
Luccioli, F. (2019) ‘Ariosto latine redditus: early modern neo-Latin rewritings of the Orlando Furioso’, in Schaffenrath, F. and Winkler, A., eds., Neo-Latin and the Vernaculars: Bilingual Interactions in the Early Modern Period (Leiden), 113–29.Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. (2006a) ‘Das Album amicorum als Bestandteil der humanistischen Kultur’, in Traditio Classicorum. Auf dem Wege zur Gründung des Centre for the Classical Tradition. Reden und Beiträge anläßlich der Beendigung der Lehrtätigkeit von Karl August Neuhausen an der Universität Bonn (Bonn), 19–33.Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. (2006b) Das Stammbuch als Bestandteil humanistischer Kultur. Das Album des Heinrich Carlhack Hermeling (1587–1592), Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. (2008) ‘Unbekannte emblematologische Jesuitendichtung: Das horazisierende Lehrgedicht De arte symbolica ad Erastum (1701) des Jacobus Boschius aus Sigmaringen’, NLJ 10: 195–261.Google Scholar
Luggin, J. (2018) ‘Macrohistory or microhistory? The Tyrolean Menippean satire as a regional literary genre’, in Jovanović, , Luggin, , Špoljarić, and Šubarić, 2018, 107–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, P. and North, J., eds. (2015) The Afterlife of Ovid, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPhail, E. (2014) Dancing Around the Well: The Circulation of Commonplaces in Renaissance Humanism, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2015) ‘Letter-writing after Ovid: his impact on neo-Latin verse epistles’, in Mack and North 2015, 95–114.Google Scholar
Marr, A., Garrod, R., Ramon Marcaida, J. and Oesterhoff, R., eds. (2019) Logodaedalus: Word Histories of Ingenuity in Early Modern Europe, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1993) Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mazzocco, A., ed. (2016) A New Sense of the Past: The Scholarship of Biondo Flavio (1392–1463), Leuven.Google Scholar
Mertz, J. J., SJ, Murphy, J. P. SJ and IJsewijn, J., eds. (1989) Jesuit Latin Poets of the 17th and 18th Centuries: An Anthology of Neo-Latin Poetry, Chicago.Google Scholar
Meynard, T., SJ (2011) Confucius Sinarum philosophus (1687): The First Translation of the Confucian Classics, Rome.Google Scholar
Meynard, T. (2015) The Jesuit Reading of Confucius. The First Complete Translation of the Lunyu (1687) Published in the West, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynard, T., SJ, and Pan, D, ed. and trans. (2020) Giulio Aleni: A Brief Introduction to the Study of Human Nature, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikołajczak, A. W. ([1998] 2005) Łacina w kulturze polskiej [= Latin in Polish Culture], Warsaw.Google Scholar
Morrall, E. J. (1988) Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini (Pius II) and Niklas von Wyle: the Tale of Two Lovers Eurialus and Lucretia, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Moss, A. (1996) Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, A. (2003) Renaissance Truth and the Latin Language Turn, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, A. (2010) ‘Other Latins, other cultures’, in Haskell, and Ruys, 2010, 19–34.Google Scholar
Moul, V. (2013) ‘Horatian Odes in Abraham Cowley’s Plantarum Libri Sex (1668)’, in Houghton and Manuwald 2013, 87–104.Google Scholar
Moul, V. (2015) ‘The transformation of Ovid in Cowley’s herb garden: books 1 and 2 of the Plantarum libri sex (1668)’, in Mack and North 2015, 221–32.Google Scholar
Moul, V. (2016) ‘Neo-Latin poetry, 1500–1700: an English perspective’, Oxford Handbooks Online https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935338.013.16.Google Scholar
Moul, V. (2017) A Guide to Neo-Latin Literature, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moul, V. (2018) ‘Neo-Latin metrical practice in English manuscript sources, c. 1550–1720’, in Tilg, S., ed., Neo-Latin Metre (Tübingen), 257–75.Google Scholar
Moul, V. (2021) ‘England’s Stilicho: Claudian’s political poetry in early modern England’, IJCT 28: 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muecke, F. and Pincelli, M. A., eds. (2016) Rome in Triumph, Books I–ii, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Murru, F. and Filos, G. P. (1980) Alla riscoperta della didattica del latino in Italia nel Settecento e nell’Ottocento, Rome.Google Scholar
Noël, F., SJ (1711) Sinensis imperii libri classici sex, Prague.Google Scholar
Norbrook, D., Harrison, S. and Hardie, P., eds. (2016) Lucretius and the Early Modern, Oxford.Google Scholar
O’Connor, E. (2001) Antonio Panormita: Hermaphroditus, Lanham, Boulder, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
O’Malley, J. W., SJ, ed. (2015) Art, Controversy, and the Jesuits: The Imago primi saeculi (1640), Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Pade, M., ed. (2015) Vitae Pomponianae: Lives of Classical Writers in Fifteenth-Century Roman Humanism (= Renæssanceforum 9), www.njrs.dk.Google Scholar
Paladini, M. (2015) Lucrezio e l’epicureismo tra Riforma e Controriforma, Naples.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. (2014) Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. (1999) The Agony of Asar: A Thesis on Slavery by the Former Slave, Jacobus Elisa Johannes Capitein, 1717–1747, Princeton.Google Scholar
Passanante, G. (2011) The Lucretian Renaissance: Philology and the Afterlife of Tradition, Chicago.Google Scholar
Pavone, F. (1968) I carmi latini del Tasso, Catania.Google Scholar
Po-chia Hsia, R. (2007) ‘The Catholic Mission and translations in China 1583–1700’, in Burke, P. and Po-chia Hsia, R., eds., Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontano, G. G. (2006) Baiae (ed. and trans. Dennis, R. G), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pontano, Giovanni Gioviano (2014) On Married Love (ed. and trans. L. Roman), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pontano, Giovanni Gioviano (2022) Eclogues. Garden of the Hesperides (ed. and trans. L. Roman), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Porteman, K., ed. (1996) Emblematic Exhibitions of the Brussels Jesuit College (1630–1685), Turnhout.Google Scholar
Possevino, A., SJ (1593) Bibliotheca selecta de ratione studiorum …, Rome.Google Scholar
Price, D. (1996) Janus Secundus, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
Prosperi, V. (2004) Di soavi licor gli orli del vaso: la fortuna di Lucrezio dall’Umanesimo alla Controriforma, Turin.Google Scholar
Rabbie, E. (1997) ‘Editing neo-Latin texts’, Editio 10: 25–48.Google Scholar
Refini, E. (2017) ‘By imitating our nurses: Latin and the vernacular in the Renaissance’, in Caferro, W., ed., The Routledge History of the Renaissance (Abingdon and New York), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, S. J. and McOmish, D., eds. (2016) Neo-Latin Literature and Literary Culture in Early Modern Scotland, Leiden.Google Scholar
Romero, I. O. (1981) ‘Jano o la literatura neolatina de Mexico’, HumLov 30: 124–55.Google Scholar
Romero, M. E. (2013) ‘El uso diglósico del latín en los villancicos a San Pedro Nolasco de Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz’, Auster 18, http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/51470.Google Scholar
Rowland, I. (1998) The Culture of the High Renaissance: Ancients and Moderns in Sixteenth-Century Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (2000) ‘Notes on the Latin poems of Samuel Johnson’, Translation and Literature 9: 215–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. (2012) ‘Samuel Johnson’s Latin poetry’, in Houghton, and Manuwald, 2013, 105–24.Google Scholar
Rudd, N., ed. (2005) Samuel Johnson: The Latin Poems, Lewisburg, PA.Google Scholar
Ruysschaert, J. (1949) Juste Lipse et les Annales de Tacite. Une méthode de critique textuelle au XVIe siècle, Leuven.Google Scholar
Sacré, D. (1996a) ‘La poésie néo-latine en France au XIXe siècle’, in Cesbron, G. and Richer, L., eds., La réception du latin du XIXe siècle à nos jours: actes du colloque d’Angers des 23 et 24 septembre 1994 (Angers), 66–77.Google Scholar
Sacré, D. (1996b), ‘Formal aspects of the Brussels emblem verses: reconnaissance of the terrain’, in Porteman, 1996, 47–53.Google Scholar
Sacré, D., Smets, M and Servotte, H, eds. and trans. (1999) Tonight They All Dance: 92 Latin and English Haiku, Wauconda, IL.Google Scholar
Sacré, D., Tusiani, J. and Deneire, T., eds. (2006) Musae saeculi XX Latinae, Brussels and Rome.Google Scholar
Sanzotta, V., ed. (2019) Una lingua morta per letterature vive: il dibattito sul latino come lingua letteraria in età moderna e contemporanea, Leuven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saracco, L. (2012) ‘Olimpia Fulvia Morato’, in Dizionario biografico degl’Italiani 76. www.treccani.it/enciclopediaolimpia-fulvia-morato_(dizionario-biografico)/.Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. (1583) De emendatione temporum, Paris.Google Scholar
Schaffenrath, F. and Winkler, A., eds. (2019) Neo-Latin and the Vernaculars: Bilingual Interactions in the Early Modern Period, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, M., ed. (1984) Jakob Bidermanns Utopia. Edition mit Übersetzung und Monographie. Bern, Frankfurt and New York.Google Scholar
Scroffa, C. (1981) I cantici di Fidenzio. Con appendice di poeti fidenziani (ed. Trifone, P), Rome.Google Scholar
Sidwell, K. (2017) ‘Editing neo-Latin literature’, in Moul, 2017, 394–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinn, C. (2007) ‘The figure in the carpet: metadramatical concepts in Jacob Bidermann’s Cenodoxus (1609)’, in Fischer, G. and Greiner, B., eds., The Play within the Play: The Performance of Meta-Theatre and Self-Reflection (Amsterdam and New York), 61–75.Google Scholar
Skafte Jensen, M. (1995) A History of Nordic Neo-Latin Literature, Odense.Google Scholar
Skafte Jensen, M. (2004) Friendship and Poetry: Studies in Danish Neo-Latin Literature, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Sluperius, J. (1575) Poemata, Antwerp.Google Scholar
Soranzo, M., ed. (2019) Giovanni Aurelio Augurello (1441–1524) and Renaissance Alchemy: A Critical Edition of Chrysopoeia and Other Alchemical Poems, with an Introduction, English Translation and Commentary, Leiden.Google Scholar
Sparrow, J. (1960) ‘Latin verse of the High Renaissance’, in Jacob, E. F., ed., Italian Renaissance Studies: A Tribute to the Late Cecilia M. Ady (London), 354–409.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. W. (1955) ‘The problem of Latin Renaissance poetry’, Studies in the Renaissance 2: 118–38.Google Scholar
Špoljarić, L. (2018) ‘Power and subversion in the ducal palace: Dalmatian patrician humanists and congratulatory orations to newly elected doges’, in Jovanović, , Luggin, , Špoljarić, and Šubarić, 2018, 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standaert, N. (2001) Handbook of Christianity in China, Vol. 1: 635–1800, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stellato, M. (1996) Le Zodiaque de la vie (Zodiacus vitae, 1534) (ed. Chomarat, J.), Geneva.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. (2005) Women Latin Poets: Language, Gender, and Authority, from Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. (2014) ‘Women writers’ networks’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014a, 1202–4.Google Scholar
Strozzi, T., SJ (1689) De mentis potu sive de cocolatis opificio, in Poemata varia, Naples.Google Scholar
Struever, N. (1993) ‘Petrarch’s Invective contra medicum: an early confrontation of rhetoric and medicine’, Modern Language Notes 108: 659–79.Google Scholar
Suárez, M. A. (2009) ‘La literatura neolatina del siglo XVIII y el exilio: la obra de Rafael Landívar y José Peramás’, in Casazza, R. et al., eds., Artes, ciencias y letras en la América colonial (Buenos Aires), 1–17.Google Scholar
Szörényi, L. (1976) ‘Poésie latine entre 1770 et 1820’, Neohelicon 4: 271–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taida, I. (2017) ‘The earliest history of European language education in Japan: focusing on Latin education by Jesuit missionaries’, Classical Receptions Journal 9: 566–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarot, R., ed. (1963) Jakob Bidermann, Cenodoxus: Abdruck nach den ‘Ludi Theatrales’ mit den Lesarten der Kelheimer und Pollinger Handschrift, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. and Coroleu, A. (1999) Latin and Vernacular in Renaissance Spain, Manchester.Google Scholar
Thill, A. (1999) La lyre jésuite: anthologie de poèmes latins (1620–1730), Geneva.Google Scholar
Thorius, R. (1626) Hymnus tabaci (ed. M. Riley), https://philological.cal.bham.ac.uk/thorius/.Google Scholar
Thurn, N. (2002) Kommentar zur Carlias des Ugolino Verino, Munich.Google Scholar
Thurn, N. (2012) Neulatein und Volkssprachen: Beispiele für die Rezeption neusprachlicher Dichtung Europas im 15.–16. Jh., Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurn, N. (2014) ‘Neo-Latin and the vernacular: poetry’, in Bloemendal, Ford and Fantazzi 2014b, 287–302.Google Scholar
Trifone, P. (2019) ‘La Maschera ambigua del pedante: Fidenzio e il suo linguaggio’, in Sorella, A. and Ortolano, P., eds., Il personaggio nella letteratura italiana (Florence), 67–74.Google Scholar
Trofymuk, M. (2014) Латиномовна література України (XV–XIX ст.): жанри, мотиви, ідеї [= Latin Literature in Ukraine (15th–19th c.): Genres, Motifs, Ideas], Lviv.Google Scholar
Tunberg, J. M. and Tunberg, T. (2000) Cattus petasatus, Wauconda, IL.Google Scholar
Tunberg, T. (1997) ‘Ciceronian Latin: Longolius and others’, HumLov 46: 13–61.Google Scholar
Urbano, C. (2005) ‘The Paciecidos by Bartolomeu Pereira, SJ: an epic interpretation of evangelization and martyrdom in 17th-century Japan,’ Bulletin of Portuguese–Japanese Studies 11: 61–95.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, B. F. (1974) Diego José Abad. Poema heroico. Introducción, versión y aparato crítico, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Valla, L. (2007) On the Donation of Constantine (ed. and trans. Bowersock, G. W), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
van Binnebeke, X. (2018) ‘The Certamen poeticum Hoeufftianum and the Second Anglo-Boer War (1899–1902)’, in Steiner-Weber, A. and Römer, F., eds., Acta conventus neo-latini Vindonobensis (Leiden), 163–72.Google Scholar
van Rompaey, C. (2015) ‘Language and meaning in the Ethics. Or, why bother with Spinoza’s Latin?’, Parrhesia 24: 336–66.Google Scholar
van Schurman, A. M. (1650) Opuscula Hebraea Graeca Latina et Gallica, prosaica et metrica, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Verbeke, D. (2015) ‘Neo-Latin’s interplay with other languages’, in Knight, and Tilg, 2015, 27–40.Google Scholar
Verhaart, F. and Brockliss, L., eds. (2023) The Latin Language and the Enlightenment, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Vissac, J. A. (1862) De la poésie latine en France au siècle de Louis XIV, Paris.Google Scholar
Vitrioli, D. ([1845] 1998) Xiphias: Epigrammata: Elegiæ, Reggio Calabria.Google Scholar
von Martels, Z. (2014) ‘Asia’, in Bloemendal, , Ford, and Fantazzi, 2014b, 849–61.Google Scholar
Vratović, V. and Gortan, V. (1969–70), Hrvatski latinisti: Croatici auctores qui latine scripserunt, Zagreb.Google Scholar
Waquet, F. (1998) Le latin ou l’empire d’un signe, XVIe–XXe siècle, Paris.Google Scholar
Waquet, F. (2001) Latin or the Empire of a Sign: From the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Centuries (trans. J. Howe), London.Google Scholar
Waquet, F. (2015) ‘Social status’, in Knight, and Tilg, 2015, 379–92.Google Scholar
Watanabe, A. (2018) ‘From Coimbra to Nagasaki: an overview of Jesuit Neo-Latin in early modern Japan’, in Gwynne, P. and Schirg, B., eds., The Economics of Poetry: The Efficient Production of Neo-Latin Verse, 1400–1720 (Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Brussels, New York and Vienna), 387–408.Google Scholar
White, J. A. (2005–16) Biondo Flavio: Italy Illuminated, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wiegand, H. (1984) Hodoeporica: Studien zur neulateinischen Reisedichtung des deutschen Kulturraums im 16. Jahrhundert. Mit einer Bio-Bibliographie der Autoren und Drucke, Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (2015) Latin of New Spain, Mundelein, IL.Google Scholar
Witt, R. G. (2000) In the Footsteps of the Ancients: The Origins of Humanism from Lovato to Bruni, Leiden.Google Scholar
Witt, R. G. (2012) The Two Latin Cultures and the Foundation of Renaissance Humanism in Medieval Italy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, E. R. (2016) The Epic of Juan Latino: Dilemmas of Race and Religion in Renaissance Spain, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, E. R., Spence, S. and Lemons, A., eds. (2014) The Battle of Lepanto, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wright, F. A. (1930) The Love Poems of Joannes Secundus: A Revised Latin Text and an English Verse Translation, Together with an Introductory Essay on the Latin Poetry of the Renaissance, London.Google Scholar
Wyatt, W. S. (1997) ‘Notes on the Latin poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins’, Translation and Literature 6: 83–8.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1964) Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, Chicago.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×