Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Map
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Historical Context
- Part II The New Testament Writings
- Part III Methods and Modes of Interpretation
- Index
- Cambridge Companions to Religion (continued from page iii)
- References
Part II - The New Testament Writings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 April 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Map
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Historical Context
- Part II The New Testament Writings
- Part III Methods and Modes of Interpretation
- Index
- Cambridge Companions to Religion (continued from page iii)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament , pp. 93 - 330Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Further Reading
Bird, Michael F. The Gospel of the Lord: How the Early Church Wrote the Story of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Bolt, Peter G. “Mark’s Gospel.” Pages 391–413 in The Face of New Testament Studies: A Survey of Recent Research. Edited by McKnight, S. and Osborne, G. R.. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004.Google Scholar
Boring, Eugene M. Mark: A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2014.Google Scholar
Gundry, Robert H. Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993.Google Scholar
Huizenga, Leroy A. Loosing the Lion: Proclaiming the Gospel of Mark. Steubenville: Emmaus Road, 2017.Google Scholar
Kok, Michael J. The Gospel on the Margins: The Reception of Mark in the Second Century. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2017.Google Scholar
Malbon, Elisabeth Struthers. Mark’s Jesus: Characterization As Narrative Christology. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Davies, W. D., and Allison, D. C.. The Gospel according to Saint Matthew. ICC. 3 vols. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988–1997.Google Scholar
Foster, P. Community, Law and Mission in Matthew’s Gospel. WUNT 2.177. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar
Konradt, M. Israel, Church, and the Gentiles in the Gospel of Matthew. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Saldarini, A. Matthew’s Christian-Jewish Community. CSHJ. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Stanton, G. A Gospel for a New People: Studies in Matthew. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1992.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bovon, François. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke. 3 vols. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002–2012.Google Scholar
Bovon, François. Luke the Theologian: Fifty-Five Years of Research (1950–2005). Waco: Baylor University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Cadbury, Henry J. The Style and Literary Method of Luke. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1920.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. The Theology of St. Luke. Translated by Geoffrey Buswell. New York: Harper & Row, 1961.Google Scholar
Foakes Jackson, F. J., and Lake, Kirsopp, eds. The Beginnings of Christianity: The Acts of the Apostles. 5 vols. London: Macmillan, 1920–1933.Google Scholar
Hornik, Heidi J., and Parsons, Mikeal C.. The Acts of the Apostles through the Centuries. Wiley Blackwell Bible Commentaries. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2017.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig. Acts: An Exegetical Commentary. 4 vols. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2012–2015.Google Scholar
Moessner, David P., Marguerat, Daniel, Parsons, Mikeal C., and Wolter, Michael, eds. Paul and the Heritage of Israel: Paul’s Claim upon Israel’s Legacy in Luke and Acts in the Light of the Pauline Letters. LNTS 452. London: T&T Clark, 2012.Google Scholar
Parsons, Mikeal C. Luke: Storyteller, Interpreter, Evangelist. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Attridge, Harold W. Essays on John and Hebrews. WUNT 2.264. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Gospel according to John. 2 vols. AB 29–29A. New York: Doubleday, 1969.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray et al. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1971.Google Scholar
Culpepper, R. Alan. Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987.Google Scholar
Dodd, C. H. The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Frey, J. Theology and History in the Fourth Gospel: Tradition and Narration. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew T. Truth on Trial: The Lawsuit Motif in the Fourth Gospel. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2000.Google Scholar
Martyn, J. Louis. History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel. 3rd. ed. NTL. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2003.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A. “The Stranger from Heaven in Johannine Sectarianism.” JBL 91 (1972): 44–72.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Donfried, K. P. Paul, Thessalonica, and Early Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Foster, P. “Who Wrote 2 Thessalonians? A Fresh Look at an Old Problem.” JSNT 35 (2012): 150–75.Google Scholar
Gupta, N. K. 1–2 Thessalonians. New Covenant Commentary Series. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2016.Google Scholar
Gupta, N. K. Zondervan Critical Introduction to 1–2 Thessalonians. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2019.Google Scholar
Krentz, E. “A Stone That Will Not Fit: The Non-Pauline Authorship of 2 Thessalonians.” Pages 439–70 in Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in Frühchristlichen Briefen. Edited by Frey, J. et al. WUNT 246. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009Google Scholar
Nasrallah, L., Bakirtzis, C., and Friesen, S., eds. From Roman to Early Christian Thessalonikē. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Nicholl, C. R. From Hope to Despair in Thessalonica: Situating 1 and 2 Thessalonians. SNTSMS 126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Thiselton, A. C. 1 & 2 Thessalonians through the Centuries. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Fee, Gordon, The First Epistle to the Corinthians. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar
Horrell, David. Solidarity and Difference: A Contemporary Reading of Paul’s Ethics. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians. HUT 28. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991.Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme. First Corinthians. Paideia Commentaries on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2012.Google Scholar
Thistelton, Anthony. First Epistle to the Corinthians. NIGTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Thrall, Margaret E. The First and Second Letters of Paul to the Corinthians. Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Welborn, L. L. Politics and Rhetoric in the Corinthian Epistles Macon: Mercer University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wire, Antoinette C. The Corinthian Women Prophets: A Reconstruction through Paul’s Rhetoric. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Luther, Martin. Lectures on Galatians (1519) and Lectures on Galatians (1535). Volumes 26–27 of Luther’s Works. Edited by Pelikan, Jaroslav and Lehmann, Helmut T.. St. Louis: Concordia, 1955–1976.Google Scholar
Martyn, J. Louis. Galatians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Yale Bible. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Reasoner, Mark. Romans in Full Circle: A History of Interpretation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2005.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley K. A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. The Climax of the Covenant: Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Donfried, K. P., and Marshall, I. H., The Theology of the Shorter Pauline Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fowl, Stephen E. Ephesians: A Commentary. NTL. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2012.Google Scholar
Gräbe, Petrus J. “Salvation in Colossians and Ephesians.” Pages 287–304 in Salvation in the New Testament: Perspectives on Soteriology. Edited by van der Watt, Jan G.. NovTSup 121. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Keck, Leander, ed. The Second Letter to the Corinthians, The Letter to the Galatians, The Letter to the Ephesians, The Letter to the Philippians, The Letter to the Colossians, The First and Second Letters to Timothy and the Letter to Titus, The Letter to Philemon. Vol. 11 of The New Interpreter’s Bible. Nashville: Abingdon, 2000.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew T., and Wedderburn, A. J. M.. The Theology of the Later Pauline Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Martin, Ralph P. Carmen Christi: Philippians ii.5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1983.Google Scholar
Sumney, Jerry L. Colossians: A Commentary. NTL. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2008.Google Scholar
Thompson, James W., and Longenecker, Bruce W.. Philippians and Philemon. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Aageson, James W. Paul, the Pastoral Epistles, and the Early Church. Library of Pauline Studies. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2008.Google Scholar
Donelson, Lewis R. Pseudepigraphy and Ethical Arguments in the Pastoral Epistles. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1986.Google Scholar
Herzer, Jens. “Rearranging the ‘House of God’: A New Perspective on the Pastoral Epistles.” Pages 547–66 in Empsychoi Logoi – Religious Innovations in Antiquity. Edited by Houtman, Alberdina, de Jong, Albert, and Misset-van de Weg, Magda. AJEC 73. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Hoklotubbe, Chris. Civilized Piety: The Rhetoric of Pietas in the Pastoral Epistles and the Roman Empire. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Johnson, Luke Timothy. Letters to Paul’s Delegates: 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus. Valley Forge: Trinity Press International, 1996.Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. “2 Timothy Contrasted with 1 Timothy and Titus.” RB 98 (1991): 403–18.Google Scholar
Prior, Michael. Paul the Letter-Writer and the Second Letter to Timothy. JSNTSup 23. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Twomey, Jay. The Pastoral Epistles through the Centuries. Blackwell Bible Commentaries. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Van Nes, Jermo. Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles: A Study of Linguistic Variation in the Corpus Paulinum. Linguistic Biblical Studies 16. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bauckham, Richard, ed. The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard, et al., eds. A Cloud of Witnesses: The Theology of Hebrews in Its Ancient Contexts. LNTS 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Cockerill, Gareth Lee. The Epistle to the Hebrews. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Docherty, Susan E. The Use of the Old Testament in Hebrews: A Case Study in Early Jewish Bible Interpretation. WUNT 2.260. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella, and Attridge, Harold W., eds. Hebrews in Contexts. AJEC 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Mackie, Scott D., ed. The Letter to the Hebrews: Critical Readings. Critical Readings in Biblical Studies. London: T&T Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Mason, Eric F., and McCruden, Kevin B., eds. Reading the Epistle to the Hebrews: A Resource for Students. RBS 66. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar
Moffitt, David M. Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews. NovTSup 141. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Moore, Nicholas J. Repetition in Hebrews: Plurality and Singularity in the Letter to the Hebrews, Its Ancient Context, and the Early Church. WUNT 2.388. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.Google Scholar
Peeler, Amy L. B. You Are My Son: The Family of God in the Epistle to the Hebrews. LNTS 486. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. Cosmology and Eschatology in Hebrews: The Settings of the Sacrifice. SNTSMS 143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Dibelius, Martin. James: A Commentary on the Epistle of James. Hermeneia. Translated by Williams, Michael A.. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976. Translation of Der Brief des Jakobus. 11th ed. Revised by Heinrich Greeven. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1964.Google Scholar
Elliott, John H. 1 Peter: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 37B. New York: Doubleday, 2000.Google Scholar
Johnson, Luke Timothy. The Letter of James: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 37. New York: Doubleday, 1995.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Karl Wilhelm, and Wall, Robert W., eds. The Catholic Epistles & Apostolic Tradition: A New Perspective on James to Jude. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben III. Letters and Homilies for Jewish Christians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on Hebrews, James, and Jude. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2007.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Barr, David L, ed. Reading the Book of Revelation: A Resource for Students. Atlanta: SBL, 2003.Google Scholar
Blount, Brian K. Can I Get a Witness? Reading Revelation through African American Culture. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2005.Google Scholar
Collins, Adela Yarbro, ed. New Perspectives on the Book of Revelation. BETL 291. Leuven: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar
Daley, Brian E. The Hope of the Early Church: A Handbook of Patristic Eschatology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Koester, Craig R. Revelation and the End of All Things. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2018.Google Scholar
Koester, Craig R. Revelation: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Yale Bible 38A. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Levine, Amy-Jill, ed. A Feminist Companion to the Apocalypse of John. FCNTECW 13. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar