Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:37:57.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - After Invention: Traces and Materials in the Eroica Finale

from Part II - Analytical Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2020

Nancy November
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Get access

Summary

The Eroica finale is its most contested movement. It is at once Beethoven’s earliest unique structure, departing from any known formal precedent, and the only piece he based on his own earlier compositions. The theme comes from his ‘heroic-allegorical’ or ‘allegorical-historical’ ballet, The Creatures of Prometheus, Op. 43, first performed in March 1801. The following year he wrote the Variations for piano in E♭ major, Op. 35, on that theme, and sought to have the title page identify the theme’s source as his ‘allegorical ballet Prometheus’.1 And, as Lewis Lockwood has shown, immediately upon completion of the variations Beethoven sketched out a movement-plan for a symphony in E♭ major, the projected finale of which is inferably to be based on Op. 35.2 It seems to have been the theme and its variations, then, that formed part of the ‘invariant concept’ of the symphony, in Lockwood’s words.3 What was it about this theme that drew Beethoven to compose with it after its invention was complete, to start to elaborate it anew, and in such different genres?4 This chapter seeks to explore the traces of these earlier works in the Eroica and to consider which of them Beethoven found essential to his symphonic conception. In particular, it will bring together his letters concerned with the counting of variations in Op. 35 and a sketch page suggesting that the theme of the Eroica finale will be ‘varied and deduced’, which have not yet made an impression on analytical understandings of the movement. Ultimately, these material traces will be used to illuminate the intersection between variation form and symphonic discourse.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×