Reconstructing the Council of Nicaea

doi:10.1017/9781108613200.005

5 - Reconstructing the Council of Nicaea

from Part II - The Council

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2020

David M. Gwynn

Edited by

Young Richard Kim

Show author details

Young Richard Kim: Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The Council of Nicaea was a landmark event, yet uncertainty surrounds almost every aspect of the council and its proceedings. No Acts survive, the signatory lists are incomplete, and the organization of the council’s meetings and the identities and motivations of those who participated remain controversial. Rather than propose another hypothetical reconstruction, the aim of this chapter is to reconsider the different interpretations made possible by our limited evidence and the particular questions that have divided scholarly opinion. Who attended the council? Who took the leading roles in the council’s deliberations? And who proposed and supported the crucial decisions, such as the inclusion of the contested term homoousios into the Nicene Creed? Not only are such questions essential to understanding the council and its legacy, but our search for answers offers the opportunity to look beyond the emperor Constantine and the most famous episcopal protagonists, and consider the significance of Nicaea for some of the less prominent figures who contributed to the drama. While their voices are difficult to hear, these more humble individuals had their own parts to play and shared the contemporary awe at a spectacle that symbolized the changing status of Christianity within the fourth-century Roman empire.

Keywords

318 bishops canons Constantine Council of Chalcedon Easter Eusebius of Caesarea homoousios Melitian Schism Ossius of Cordova signature lists

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea , pp. 90 - 110

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108613200.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select References

Aubineau, Michel. 1966. “Les 318 serviteurs d’Abraham (Gen., XIV, 14) et le nombre des pères au concile de Nicée (325).” RHE 61:5–43.Google Scholar

Barnes, Timothy D. 1978. “Emperors and Bishops, ad 324–344: Some Problems.” American Journal of Ancient History 3:53–75.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Henry. 1960. “Faith and Order at the Council of Nicaea: A Note on the Background of the Sixth Canon.” HTR 53:171–95.Google Scholar

De Clercq, Victor C. 1954. Ossius of Cordova: A Contribution to the History of the Constantinian Period. Studies in Christian Antiquity 13. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

DelCogliano, Mark. 2011b. “The Promotion of the Constantinian Agenda in Eusebius of Caesarea’s On the Feast of Pascha.” In Reconsidering Eusebius: Collected Papers on Literary, Historical, and Theological Issues, ed. Inowlocki, S. and Zamagni, C., 39–68. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 107. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Gelzer, Heinrich, Hilgenfeld, Heinrich and Cuntz, Otto, eds. 1898. Patrum Nicaenorum nomina Latine Graece Coptice Syriace Arabice Armeniace sociata opera. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Gwynn, David M. 2009. “The Council of Chalcedon and the Definition of Christian Tradition.” In Chalcedon in Context: Church Councils 400–700, ed. Price, Richard and Whitby, Mary, 7–26. TTH, Contexts 1. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Gwynn, David M. 2012. Athanasius of Alexandria: Bishop, Theologian, Ascetic, Father. Christian Theology in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hauben, Hans. 2012. Studies on the Melitian Schism in Egypt (AD 306–335), ed. Van Nuffelen, Peter. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Honigmann, Ernst. 1939. “La liste originale des pères de Nicée: à propos de l’Évêché de ‘Sodoma’ en Arabie.” Byzantion 14(1): 17–76.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. N. D. 1972. Early Christian Creeds, 3rd ed. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Lim, Richard. 1995. Public Disputation, Power, and Social Order in Late Antiquity. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 23. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

MacMullen, Ramsay. 2006. Voting About God in Early Church Councils. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Person, Ralph E. 1978. The Mode of Theological Decision Making at the Early Ecumenical Councils: An Inquiry into the Function of Scripture and Tradition at the Councils of Nicaea and Ephesus. Theologische Dissertationen 14. Basel: F. Reinhardt.Google Scholar

Price, Richard, and Gaddis, Michael, eds. 2005. The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon. 3 vols. TTH 45. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar