Outcomes

Part III - Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2020

Edited by

Young Richard Kim

Show author details

Young Richard Kim: Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea , pp. 133 - 222

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108613200 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select References

Beatrice, Pier Franco. 2002. “The Word ‘Homoousios’ from Hellenism to Christianity.” CH 71(2): 243–72.Google Scholar

Bidez, J., ed. 1913. Philostorgius, Kirchengeschichte. GCS 21. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar

Bindley, Thomas Herbert. 1899. The Oecumenical Documents of the Faith. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Dossetti, Giuseppe. 1967. Il simbolo di Nicea e di Constantinopoli: Edizione critica. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar

Edwards Mark, J. 2012. “Alexander of Alexandria and the Homoousion.” VC 66(5): 482–502.Google Scholar

Heurtley, Charles Able. 1911. De Fide et Symbolo. Oxford: Parker.Google Scholar

Hort, Fenton J. A. 1876. Two Dissertations. Cambridge: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. N. D. 1972. Early Christian Creeds. 3rd ed. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Pietras, Henryk. 2016. Council of Nicaea (325): Religious and Political Context, Documents, Commentaries. Rome: Gregorian and Biblical Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard, and Gaddis, Michael. 2005. The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon. TTH 45. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Siecienski, A. Edward. 2010. The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy. Oxford Studies in Historical Theology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skarsaune, Oskar. 1987. “A Neglected Detail in the Creed of Nicaea (325).” VC 41(1): 34–54.Google Scholar

Stead, G. Christopher. 1961. “The Significance of the Homoousios.” StPatr 3: 397–412.Google Scholar

Stead, G. Christopher. 1998. “The Word ‘From Nothing’.” JTS, n.s., 49(2): 671–84.Google Scholar

Thomson, Robert, and Howard-Johnston, James, trans. 1999. The Armenian History Attributed to Sebeos. TTH 31. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Wiles, Maurice F. 1993. “A Textual Variant in the Creed of the Council of Nicaea.” StPatr 26: 428–33.Google Scholar

Select References

Alberigo, Giuseppe, and Jedin, Hubert, eds. 1991. Conciliorum oecumenicorum decreta. Bologna: Edizione Dehoniane.Google Scholar

Beneševič, Vladimir. 1937. Ioannis Scholastici Synagoga L titulorum ceteraque eiusdem opera iuridica. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Philosophisch-Historische Abteilung, Neue Folge 14. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Beneševič, Vladimir. (1906) 1974. Drevne-slavjanskaja kormcaja XIV titulov bez tolkovanij (Syntagma XIV titulorum sine scholiis secundum versionem Palaeo-Slovenicam, adjecto textu Graeco e vetustissimis codicibus manuscriptis exarato. St. Petersburg, 1906. Reprinted Leipzig: Zentralantiquariat der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik.Google Scholar

Hefele, Carl Joseph von, and Leclercq, Henri. 1907. Histoire des conciles d’après les documents originaux, 1.1. Paris: Letouzey et Ané.Google Scholar

Joannou, Périclès-Pierre, ed. 1963. Discipline générale antique (IV^e–IX^e s.), vol. 2: Les canons des Pères Grecs. Fonti: Pontificia commissione per la redazione del codice di diritto canonico orientale ser. 1, 9.2. Grottaferrata (Roma): Tipografia Italo-Orientale “S. Nilo.”Google Scholar

Lafontaine, Paul-Henri. 1963. Les conditions positives de l’Accession aux Ordres dans la première legislation ecclésiastique (300–492). Ottawa: Éditions de l’Université d’Ottawa.Google Scholar

L’Huillier, Peter. 1996. The Church of the Ancient Councils: The Disciplinary Work of the First Four Ecumenical Councils. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar

Linck, Heinrich. 1908. Zur Übersetzung und Erläuterung der Kanones IV, VI und VII des Konzils von Nicaea. Gießen: Münchow’sche Hof- und Universitäts-Druckerei.Google Scholar

Lübeck, Konrad. 1901. Reichseinteilung und kirchliche Hierarchie des Ostens bis zum Ausgange des vierten Jahrhunderts: Ein Beitrag zur Rechts- und Verfassungsgeschichte der Kirche. Kirchengeschichtliche Studien 5.4. Münster: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Ohme, Heinz. 1998. Kanon ekklesiastikos: Die Bedeutung des altkirchlichen Kanonsbegriff. Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte 67. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ohme, Heinz. 2012. “Greek Canon Law to 691/2.” In The History of Byzantine and Eastern Canon Law to 1500, ed. Hartmann, Wilfried and Pennington, Kenneth, 24–114. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Poschmann, Bernhard. 1954. “Bußstufen (Bußstationen).” In RAC 2: 814–16.Google Scholar

Tanner, S. J., Norman, P., ed. 1990. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, vol. 1. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar

Ulrich, Jörg. 1994. Die Anfänge der abendländischen Rezeption des Nizänums. Patristische Texten und Studien 39. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Weckwerth, Andreas. 2010. Ablauf, Organisation und Selbstverständnis westlicher antiker Synoden im Spiegel ihrer Akten. Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum: Ergänzungsband Kleine Reihe 5. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Google Scholar

Wohlmuth, Josef, ed. 1998. Dekrete der ökumenischen Konzilien, vol 1. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar

Select References

Barnes, Timothy D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Averil, and Hall, Stuart G., trans. 1999. Eusebius: Life of Constantine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Charles. 1943. Bedae opera de temporibus. Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America.Google Scholar

Krusch, Bruno. 1880. Studien zur christlich-mittelalterlichen Chronologie: Der 84jährige Ostercyclus und seine Quellen. Leipzig: Veit.Google Scholar

Krusch, Bruno. 1938. Studien zur christlich-mittelalterlichen Chronologie: Die Entstehung unserer heutigen Zeitrechnung. Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 8. Berlin: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Mc Carthy, Daniel. 1993. “Easter Principles and a Fifth-Century Lunar Cycle Used in the British Isles.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 24: 204–24.Google Scholar

Mc Carthy, Daniel. 2011. “On the Arrival of the Latercus in Ireland.” In The Easter Controversy of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, ed. Warntjes, Immo and Cróinín, Dáibhí Ó, 48–75. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Mc Carthy, Daniel and Breen, Aidan, eds. 2003. The Ante-Nicene Christian Pasch “De ratione paschali”: The Paschal Tract of Anatolius, Bishop of Laodicea. Dublin: Four Courts.Google Scholar

Mosshammer, Alden. 2008. The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mosshammer, Alden, ed. 2017. The Prologues on Easter of Theophilus of Alexandria and [Cyril]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Robertson, Archibald, trans. 1892. Athanasius: Select Works and Letters. NPNF 2.4. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Eduard. 1905. Christliche und jüdische Ostertafeln. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologisch-historische Klasse, Neue Folge, vol. 8, no. 6. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Eduard, Schwartz and Mommsen, Theodor, eds. 1903–9. Eusebius Werke II.1–3. Die Kirchengeschichte. GCS 9.1–3. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar

van der Hagen, Johannes. 1733. Observationes in Prosperi Aquitani Chronicon […] Amsterdam: Johannem Boom.Google Scholar

Walch, Christian. 1770. “Decreti Nicaeni de Paschate Explicatio.” Novum Commentarium Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Goettingensis, commentationes historicae et philologicae 1: 10–65. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Select References

Barnes, Timothy D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Averil, and Hall, Stuart G., trans. 1999. Eusebius: Life of Constantine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dainese, Davide. 2011. “Συνέρχομαι – συγρότησις – σύνοδος. Tre diversi usi della denominazione.” Cristianesimo nella storia 32: 875–943.Google Scholar

DelCogliano, Mark. 2006. “Eusebian Theologies of the Son as the Image of God before 341.” JECS 14 (4): 458–84.Google Scholar

Drake, H. A. 2000. Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Drecoll, Volker Henning. 2013. “How Binitarian/Trinitarian Was Eusebius?” In Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations, ed. Johnson, Aaron P. and Schott, Jeremy, 289–305. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies Press.Google Scholar

Irshai, Oded. 2011. “Fourth Century Christian Palestinian Politics.” In Reconsidering Eusebius: Collected Papers on Literary, Historical, and Theological Issues, ed. Inowlocki, Sabrina and Zamagni, Claudio, 25–38. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 107. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Johannessen, Hazel. 2016. The Demonic in the Political Thought of Eusebius of Caesarea. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Aaron P. 2014. Eusebius. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Lyman, Rebecca. 1993. Christology and Cosmology: Models of Divine Activity in Origen, Eusebius and Athanasius. Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morlet, Sébastien. 2009. La Démonstration évangélique d’Eusèbe de Césarée: Étude sur l’apologétique chrétienne à l’époque de Constantin. Collection des Études augustiniennes, Série Antiquité 187. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Spoerl, Kelley McCarthy and Vinzent, Markus, trans. 2017. Eusebius of Caesarea: Against Marcellus and On Ecclesiastical Theology. FC 135. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Strutwolf, Holger. 1999. Die Trinitätstheologie und Christologie des Euseb von Caesarea. Forschungen zur Kirchen- und Dogmengeschichte 72. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Van Nuffelen, Peter. 2013. “Eusebius and Images of Truth in the Life of Constantine.” In Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations, ed. Johnson, Aaron P. and Schott, Jeremy 133–49. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Michael Stuart. 2008. Authorized Lives in Early Christian Biography: Between Eusebius and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part III - Outcomes

Summary

Access options

References

Select References

Select References

Select References

Select References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive