Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Contexts
- Part II The Council
- Part III Outcomes
- Part IV The Aftermath
- Part V The Long Reception
- Appendices
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Part I - Contexts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Contexts
- Part II The Council
- Part III Outcomes
- Part IV The Aftermath
- Part V The Long Reception
- Appendices
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea , pp. 17 - 62Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Select References
Barnes, Timothy D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Timothy D. 2011. Constantine: Dynasty, Religion and Power in the Later Roman Empire. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bowman, Alan K. 2005. “Diocletian and the First Tetrarchy, A.D. 284–305.” In The Cambridge Ancient History, Second Edition, Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire, A.D. 193–337, edited by Bowman, Alan K., Cameron, Averil, and Garnsey, Peter, 67–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A., trans. 1976. In Praise of Constantine: A Historical Study and New Translation of Eusebius’ Tricennial Orations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Georgia. 2000. The Memory of the Eyes: Pilgrims to Living Saints in Christian Late Antiquity. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 30. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, Robert C., and Groh, Dennis. 1981. Early Arianism: A View of Salvation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Gwynn, David M. 2007. The Eusebians: The Polemic of Athanasius of Alexandria and the Construction of the “Arian Controversy.” Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hekster, Olivier. 2015. Emperors and Ancestors: Roman Rulers and the Constraints of Tradition. Oxford Studies in Ancient Culture and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lenski, Noel, ed. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, Richard, ed. 2016. The Donatist Schism: Controversy and Contexts. TTH, Contexts 2. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Salzman, Michele Renee. 1990. On Roman Time: The Codex-Calendar of 354 and the Rhythms of Urban Life in Late Antiquity. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 17. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Raymond. 2007. The Roman Revolution of Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Raymond. 2010. Rome and Constantinople: Rewriting Roman History during Late Antiquity. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Raymond. 2011. Remembering Constantine at the Milvian Bridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Raymond. 2018. “Eastern Aristocracies and Imperial Courts: Constantine’s Half-Brother, Licinius’s Prefect, and Egyptian Grain.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 72:1–24.Google Scholar
Select References
Anatolios, Khaled. 2011. Retrieving Nicaea: The Development and Meaning of Trinitarian Doctrine. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. 2004. Nicaea and its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Behr, John. 2004. The Nicene Faith, Formation of Christian Theology 2. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
DelCogliano, Mark. 2006. “Eusebian Theologies of the Son as the Image of God before 341.” JECS 14(4): 458–84.Google Scholar
DelCogliano, Mark. 2015. “Asterius in Athanasius’ Catalogue of Arian Views.” JTS, n.s., 66(2): 625–50.Google Scholar
DelCogliano, Mark. 2018. “How Did Arius Learn from Asterius? On the Relationship between the Thalia and the Syntagmation.” JEH 69(3): 477–92.Google Scholar
Galvão-Sobrinho, Carlos R. 2013. Doctrine and Power: Theological Controversy and Christian Leadership in the Later Roman Empire. Transformation of the Classical World 51. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, Robert C., and Groh, Dennis. 1981. Early Arianism: A View of Salvation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Gwynn, David M. 2007. The Eusebians: The Polemic of Athanasius and the Construction of the Arian Controversy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. 1988. The Search for the Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318–381. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Rudolf. 1979. Arius judaizans? Untersuchungen zur dogmengeschichtlichen Einordnung des Arius. Forschungen zur Kirchen- und Dogmengeschichte 31. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Parvis, Sara. 2006. Marcellus of Ancyra and the Lost Years of the Arian Controversy 325–345. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan D. 1987. Arius: Heresy and Tradition. London: Darton, Longman and Todd. Rev. ed. 2001. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar