Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:50:04.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Edited by
George Duke  and
Robert P. George
George Duke
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Robert P. George
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence , pp. 15 - 130
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alexy, R. 2007. ‘The Dual Nature of Law’. Ratio Juris 23: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. 1885. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Ed. Campbell, R.. Murray, J..Google Scholar
Boyle, J., Grisez, G. and Tollefsen, O. 1976, Free Choice: A Self-Referential Argument. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Burazin, L. 2016. ‘Can there be an Artefactual Theory of Law?’ Ratio Juris 29: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 1983. Fundamentals of Ethics. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2010. ‘Law as Idea, Ideal, and Duty’, Jurisprudence 1: 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011a. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011b. Collected Essays I: Reason in Action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011c. Collected Essays II: Intention and Identity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011d. Collected Essays IV: Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2013. ‘Reflections and Responses’. In Reason, Morality, and Law, eds. Keown, J. and George, R.P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2014. ‘Law as Fact and as Reason for Action: A Response to Robert Alexy on Law’s “Ideal Dimension”’, American Journal of Jurisprudence 59: 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2015. ‘Grounding Human Rights in Natural Law’, American Journal of Jurisprudence 60: 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2016. ‘Aquinas’ Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/aquinas-moral-political/.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2017. ‘On the Nature of Law’. In ed. Tasioulas, J.. The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Law.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. and Grisez, G. 1981. ‘The Basic Principles of Natural Law: A Reply to Ralph McInerny’, American Journal of Jurisprudence 26: 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J., Boyle, J. and Grisez, G. 1987. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. 1969. The Morality of Law rev. ed. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 2012. Law as a Leap of Faith. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. 1987. ‘Natural Law and Natural Inclinations: Some Comments and Clarifications’, New Scholasticism, 61: 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. 1988. ‘The Structures of Practical Reason: Some Comments and Clarifications’, Thomist, 52: 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1983. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1651/1996. Leviathan ed. Tuck, R.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leiter, B. 2012. ‘The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Skepticism’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32: 663–677.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1664/2008. Questions Concerning the Law of Nature. ed. and trans. Horwitz, R., Clay, D. and Clay, J.S.. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1690/1979. Essay Concerning Human Understanding ed. Nidditch, P.H.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2015. ‘Two Unhappy Dilemmas for Natural Law Jurisprudence’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 60: 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1994. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 2009. Between Authority and Interpretation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, F. 2012. ‘On the Nature of the Nature of Law’. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 98: 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2011. Legality. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, N.E. 2007. Law as a Moral Idea. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waluchow, W. and Sciaraffa, S. (eds.) 2013. Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Works Cited

Boyle, J.M., Grisez, G. and Tollefsen, C. 1976. Free Choice: A Self-Referential Argument. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J., Boyle, J.M. and Grisez, G. 1987. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1991. Moral Absolutes: Tradition, Revision and Truth. The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011a. Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011b. Collected Essays I: Reason in Action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011c. Collected Essays V: Religion and Public Reasons. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, R.P. 1999. In Defense of Natural Law. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, R.P. and Tollefsen, C. 2011. Embryo: A Defense of Human Life (2nd edition): Witherspoon Institute Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1888/1739. A Treatise of Human Nature. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1994/1651. Leviathan. Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lonergan, B.J.F. 1955. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Y.R. 1962. A General Theory of Authority. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Vatican Council II. 1988. The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents, revised edition, ed. Flannery, A.. O.P. Costello Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Works Cited

Ahnert, T. 2006. Religion and the Origins of the German Enlightenment. Faith and the Reform of Learning in the Thought of Christian Thomasius. University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Alberti, V. 1678. Compendium Juris Naturae, Orthodoxae Theologiae Conformatum, Georg Heinrich Frommann.Google Scholar
Bisset, S. 2015. ‘Jean Barbeyrac’s Theory of Permissive Natural Law and the Foundations of Property Rights’. Journal of the History of Ideas 76: 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, R. 1982. ‘Das Erlaubnisgesetz, oder: Vernunft und Geschichte in Kants Rechtslehre’. In Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung, ed. Brandt, R.. Walter de Gruyter: 233–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burlamaqui, J.-J. 1747. Principes du Droit Naturel. Barillot et fils.Google Scholar
Burlamaqui, J.-J. 1751. Principes du Droit Politique. Barillot et fils.Google Scholar
Burlamaqui, J.-J. 1763/2006. The Principles of Natural and Politic Law, trans. Nugent, T., ed. Korkman, P.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Byrd, B.S. and Hruschka, J. 2010. Kant’s Doctrine of Right. A Commentary. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocceji, S. 1740. Novum Systema Justitiae Naturalis et Romanae. Johan Peter Schmid.Google Scholar
Cumberland, R. 1672/2005. A Treatise of the Laws of Nature, trans. Maxwell, J., ed. Parkin, J.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. 1796/2000. Foundations of Natural Right According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre, trans. Baur, M., ed. Neuhouser, F.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregor, M.J. 1963. Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant’s Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grote, S. 2006. ‘Hutcheson’s Divergence from Shaftesbury’. The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 4: 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, H. 1625/2005. The Rights of War and Peace, trans. anon., ed. Tuck, R.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 1996. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 2002. ‘The Moral Conservatism of Natural Rights’. In Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty: Moral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought, ed. Hunter, I. and Saunders, D.. Palgrave: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 2006. ‘German Natural Law’. In Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Goldie, M., Wokler, R., Cambridge University Press: 251–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 2012. ‘Natural Jurisprudence and the Identity of the Scottish Enlightenment’. In Religion and Philosophy in Enlightenment Britain, ed. Savage, R.. Oxford University Press: 258–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 2013. ‘Natural Rights or Political Prudence? Toleration in Francis Hutcheson’. In Natural Law and Toleration in the Early Enlightenment, ed. Parkin, J., Stanton, T.. Oxford University Press: 183–200.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. and Seidler, M. 2016. ‘‘Natural Law: Law, Rights and Duties’. In A Companion to Intellectual History, ed. Whatmore, R., Young, B.. Wiley-Blackwell: 377–401.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T.J. 1993. ‘Conscience and Reason: The Natural Law Theory of Jean Barbeyrac’. Historical Journal 36: 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstrasser, T.J. 2000. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I. 2001. Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I. 2002. ‘The Morals of Metaphysics: Kant’s Groundwork as Intellectual Paideia’. Critical Inquiry 28: 908–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I. 2007. The Secularisation of the Confessional State. The Political Thought of Christian Thomasius. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I. 2012. ‘Vattel’s Law of Nations: Diplomatic Casuistry for the Protestant Nation’. Grotiana 31: 1–33.Google Scholar
Hunter, I. 2014. ‘The Law of Nature and Nations’. In The Routledge Companion to Eighteenth Century Philosophy, ed. Garrett, A.. Routledge: 559–592.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, F. 1747/2007. Philosophiae Moralis Institutio Compendiaria/Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy, trans. anon., ed. Turco, L.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, F. 1755/forthcoming. A System of Moral Philosophy, ed. Haakonssen, K.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1996. Practical Philosophy, trans., ed. Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klippel, D. (ed.). 1997. Naturrecht im 19. Jahrhundert. Kontinuität, Inhalt, Funktion, Wirkung. Keip Verlag.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. 1988. The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed., trans. Riley, P., Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. 2006. ‘Natural Rights in the Scottish Enlightenment’. In Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, eds. Goldie, M., Wokler, R.. Cambridge University Press: 291–316.Google Scholar
Osterhorn, E-D. 1962. Die Naturrechtslehre Valentin Albertis. Ein Beitrag zum Rechtsdenken der lutherischen Orthodoxie des 17. Jahrhunderts, Inaugural Diss., Albert-Ludwig-Universität Freiburg i.B.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 1672/1749/forthcoming. The Law of Nature and Nations. ed. Barbeyrac, J., trans. Kennet, B., re-ed. by Haakonssen, K.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 1673/1991. On the Duty of Man and Citizen, trans. Silverthorne, M., ed. Tully, J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 1673/2003. The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, trans. Tooke, A., ed. Hunter, I., Saunders, D.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, H. 1997. Rousseau and Geneva. From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J.B. 1993. ‘Kant and Natural Law Ethics’. Ethics 104: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidler, M. 2015. ‘Pufendorf’s Moral and Political Philosophy’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, E.N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/pufendorf-moral/. Accessed December 2015.Google Scholar
Silvestrini, G. 2010. ‘Rousseau, Pufendorf and the Eighteenth-Century Natural Law Tradition’. History of European Ideas 36: 280–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stipperger, E. 1984. Freiheit und Institution bei Christian Wolff (1679–1754), Verlag Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. 2015. Roman Law in the State of Nature. The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymkowiak, A. 2009. ‘Kant’s Permissive Law. Critical Rights, Sceptical Politics’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17: 567–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasius, C. 1688/2011. Institutes of Divine Jurisprudence, with Selections from Foundations of the Law of Nature and Nations, ed. and trans. Ahnert, T.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Tierney, B. 2014. Liberty and Law. The Idea of Permissive Natural Law, 1100–1800. The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace. Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vattel, E. 1758/2008. The Law of Nations, or the Principles of the Law of Nature, trans. anon., ed. Kapossy, B., Whatmore, R.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Wokler, R. 1994. ‘Rousseau’s Pufendorf: Natural Law and the Foundation of Commercial Society’. History of Political Thought 15: 373–402.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1740–48/2016. The Law of Nations According to the Scientific Method, ed. Ahnert, T.. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Works Cited

Alexy, R. 2008. ‘On the Concept and Nature of Law’, Ratio Juris, 21, pp. 281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2010a. The Argument from Injustice. Trans. Paulson, B.L. and Paulson, S.L.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2010b. ‘The Dual Nature of Law’, Ratio Juris, 23, pp. 167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1948. Summa Theologiae. Trans. Fathers, Dominican. Notre Dame, IN: Ave MariaGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. 1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, L.R. 2004. ‘The Ontology of Artifacts’, Philosophical Explorations, 7, pp. 99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, L.R. 2007. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life: An Essay in Practical Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, M.E. and Komatsu, L.K.. 1989. ‘Defining Features of Natural Kinds and Artifacts’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, pp. 433–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastick, T. 1982. Intuition: How We Think and Act. Chichester: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. 1996. ‘Intention, History and Artifact Concepts’, Cognition, 60, pp.1–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burge, T. 1992. ‘Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950–1990’, Philosophical Review, 101, pp. 3–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrara, M. and Vermaas, P.E.. 2009. ‘The Fine-Grained Metaphysics of Artifactual and Biological Functional Kinds’, Synthese, 169, pp. 125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, T. 1998. Understanding Human Goods. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartier, G. 2009. Economic Justice and Natural Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. and Simchen, O.. 2003. ‘Law’, Legal Theory, 9, pp. 1–41Google Scholar
Crowe, J. 2005. ‘Existentialism and Natural Law’, Adelaide Law Review, 26, pp. 55–72Google Scholar
Crowe, J. 2011a. ‘Natural Law Beyond Finnis’, Jurisprudence, 2, pp. 293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, J. 2011b. ‘Pre-Reflective Law’, in New Waves in Philosophy of Law. Ed. Del Mar, M.. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Crowe, J. 2012. ‘Clarifying the Natural Law Thesis’, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 37, pp. 159–181Google Scholar
Crowe, J. 2014. ‘Law as an Artifact Kind’, Monash University Law Review, 40, pp. 737–757Google Scholar
Crowe, J. 2015. ‘Natural Law and Normative Inclinations’, Ratio Juris, 28, pp.52–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, J. 2016. ‘Natural Law Theories’, Philosophy Compass, 11, pp. 91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, K. 2009. ‘Defending the Possibility of a Neutral Functional Theory of Law’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29, pp. 91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, K. 2013. ‘Functions in Jurisprudential Methodology’, Philosophy Compass, 8, pp. 447–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C.L. 2004. Real Natures and Familiar Objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C.L. 2007. ‘On the Place of Artifacts in Ontology’, in Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation. Eds Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 1983. Fundamentals of Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011. Natural Law and Natural Rights. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Fortin, E.L. 1982. ‘The New Rights Theory and the Natural Law’, Review of Politics, 44, pp. 590–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1969. The Morality of Law. Revised edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. 2004. ‘The Legality of Law’, Ratio Juris, 17, pp. 168–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, R.P. 1988. ‘Recent Criticism of Natural Law Theory’, University of Chicago Law Review, 55, pp. 1371–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, A. 2002. Morality and the Human Goods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. 1965. ‘The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1–2, Question 94, Article 2’, Natural Law Forum, 10, pp. 168–201Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1983. The Way of the Lord Jesus: Christian Moral Principles. Quincy, IL: Franciscan PressGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J.M. and Finnis, J.. 1987a. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J.M. and Finnis, J.. 1987b. ‘Practical Principles, Moral Truth and Ultimate Ends’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 32, pp. 99–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Miller, A.V.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hilpinen, R. 1993. ‘Authors and Artifacts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 93, pp. 155–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hittinger, R. 1987. A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University PressGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 1980. ‘Referring to Artifacts’, Philosophical Review, 89, pp.109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, B. 2011. ‘The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Scepticism’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31, pp. 663–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1989. ‘Dispositional Theories of Value’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 63, pp. 113–137Google Scholar
Levinson, J. 1979. ‘Defining Art Historically’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 19, pp. 232–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, J. 2007. ‘Artworks as Artifacts’, in Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation. Eds Margolis, E. and Laurence, S.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lisska, A. 1996. Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Lumb, R.D. 1959. ‘The Scholastic Doctrine of Natural Law’, Melbourne University Law Review, 2, pp. 205–221Google Scholar
Macklem, T. 2013. ‘Ideas of Easy Virtue’, in Reason, Morality and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis. Eds Keown, J. and George, R.P.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Maslow, A.H. 1943. ‘A Theory of Human Motivation’, Psychological Review, 50, pp. 370–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerny, R. 1982. Ethica Thomistica. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America PressGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M.S. 1992. ‘Law as a Functional Kind’, in Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Ed. George, R.P.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, M.S. 2001. ‘Law as Justice’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 18, pp. 115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2001. Natural Law and Practical Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2003. ‘Natural Law Jurisprudence’, Legal Theory, 9, pp. 241–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2006. Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2011. ‘Defect and Deviance in Natural Law Jurisprudence’, in Institutional Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Ed. Klatt, M.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2013. ‘The Explanatory Role of the Weak Natural Law Thesis’, in Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Eds.Waluchow, W. and Sciaraffa, S.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap PressGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. 1993. ‘Basic Goods and the Human Good in Recent Catholic Moral Theology’, The Thomist, 57, pp. 27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1979. The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Shiner, R.A. 2010. ‘Law and its Normativity’, in A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Ed. Patterson, D.. 2nd edn. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Sloman, S. and Malt, B.. 2002. ‘Artifacts Are Not Ascribed Essences, Nor Are They Treated as Belonging to Kinds’, Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, pp. 563–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. 1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A.L. 2003. ‘Realism and Human Kinds’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67, pp. 580–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A.L. 2007a. ‘Artifacts and Human Concepts’, in Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation. Eds Margolis, E. and Laurence, S.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A.L. 2007b. Ordinary Objects. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Veatch, H. 1981. ‘Natural Law and the “Is”-“Ought” Question’, Catholic Lawyer, 81, pp. 251–265Google Scholar
Vernon, M.D. 1969. Human Motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1980. Sameness and Substance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 2001. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Foundations
  • Edited by George Duke, Deakin University, Victoria, Robert P. George, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
  • Online publication: 04 July 2017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Foundations
  • Edited by George Duke, Deakin University, Victoria, Robert P. George, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
  • Online publication: 04 July 2017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Foundations
  • Edited by George Duke, Deakin University, Victoria, Robert P. George, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
  • Online publication: 04 July 2017
Available formats
×