Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:24:45.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

James Crawford
Affiliation:
Latrobe University
Martti Koskenniemi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
James Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martti Koskenniemi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Purpose of the Companion

From an exotic specialisation on the fringes of the law school, international law has turned during the twentieth century into a ubiquitous presence in global policy-making as well as in academic and journalistic commentary. With internationalisation first, globalisation later, questions about the legality under international treaties or customary law of this or that action were posed with increasing urgency in the media and by citizen activists as well as by governments and international institutions. International law exited the chambers of diplomacy to become part of the debates on how the world is governed. With good reason, the last ten years of the old millennium were labelled by the United Nations General Assembly the ‘Decade of International Law’. The decade saw such impressive developments as the establishment in 1995 of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) with a powerful system for settling trade disputes. In 1998 the Rome Treaty was adopted that led to the setting up of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to try suspected war criminals and those committing grave violations of human rights. The system of multilateral human rights and environmental treaties expanded and, as many said, henceforth needed more deepening rather than widening. The UN Security Council arose from its Cold War slumber to take action in many regional crises, sometimes with more, sometimes with less success, but always surrounded by much legal argument. Cooperation in development and in the organisation of international investment took a legal turn: the rhetoric of ‘rule of law’ penetrated everywhere. The same trends continued in the first decade of the new millennium. At the same time, however, new concerns emerged. Violations of human rights and humanitarian law kept occurring, especially in the Third World but also in Europe, while only little progress was attained in the eradication of poverty and global economic injustice. Some activities led by the Great Powers such as the bombing of Belgrade by the North Atlantic alliance (NATO) in 1999 or the campaign to oust Saddam Hussein from Iraq’s leadership in 2003 became the subject of heated debate. The relationship between the fight against terrorism and the protection of human rights divided opinions in Europe and elsewhere. While the number of democratic countries increased, democracy also brought popular restlessness and conflict out in the open.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownlie, I., 2008. Principles of Public International Law, 7th edn., Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
ILC 2006. Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, finalised by Koskenniemi, Martti, UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682, 13 April 2006
Janis, M. W., 1984. ‘Jeremy Bentham and the Fashioning of “International Law”’, 78 AJIL405–418Google Scholar
Keane, J., 2005. Global Civil Society?, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kmak, M., 2011. The Scope and Application of the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction, Helsinki: Erik Castrén Institute Research ReportsGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, A. -K., 2005. Non-governmental Organisations in International Law, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Moyn, S., 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q., 2010. ‘The Sovereign State: a Genealogy’, in Kalmo, H. and Skinner, Q. (eds.), Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept, Cambridge University Press, 26–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×