Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:45:18.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Conserving the world’s resources?

from Part IV - Projects of international law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Sundhya Pahuja
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
James Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martti Koskenniemi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Central to the question of how we live is how we share the earth. From conflict over territory, to passage over the high seas, to the quest for raw materials, to disputes over water and oil, to dams and development, to methods of agriculture, food security and to negotiations over climate change, the question of resources lies at the heart of many international events. The struggle for the use, control and distribution of the earth and its riches has been the impelling force behind a great deal of international legal doctrine, including much which might, at first glance seem unrelated to that issue. From the River Oder case at the Permanent Court of Justice in 1929, to the judgments of the International Court in Corfu Channel in 1949 and the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project case in 1997, many landmark decisions of international courts and tribunals, cited for a range of legal principles involving sources, jurisdiction, nationality, etc. involve at base disputes over scarce resources.

But if the struggle for control over resources lurks under the surface of international law, international law lies in the background of how we understand and define them in the first place. The idea of background reiterates the importance, highlighted by other chapters in this volume, of an appreciation of historical context in understanding international law. In this instance, the ‘background’ is closely connected to international law’s imperial origins (Anghie 2005; Chimni 1987).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anghie, A., 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J., 2009. ‘The Impossible Necessity of Climate Justice?’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 10, 424–438Google Scholar
Bastmeijer, K. and Koivurova, T., 2008. Theory and Practice of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment, Boston: Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, K. and Cramer, C., 2001. ‘Privatisation and the Post-Washington Consensus: Between the Laboratory and the Real World’, in Fine, B., Lapavitsas, C. and Pincus, J. (eds.), Development Policy in the 21st Century: Beyond the Post-Washington Consensus, LondonRoutledge, 52–79Google Scholar
Beard, J., 2007. The Political Economy of Desire: International Law, Development and the Nation State, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bedjaoui, M., 1979. Towards a New International Economic Order, New York: Holmes & MeierGoogle Scholar
Birnie, P., Boyle, A. and Redgwell, C., 2009. International Law and the Environment, 3rd edn., Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Brown-Weiss, E., 1992. ‘International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order’, Georgetown Law Journal, 81, 675–710Google Scholar
Brunnée, J., 2007. ‘Common Areas, Common Heritage, and Common Concern’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, H., 2002. ‘International Law: A Discipline of Crisis’, Modern Law Review, 65, 377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimni, B., 1987. International Commodity Agreements: A Legal Study, London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T. and Matteotti-Berkutova, S., 2009. ‘International Environmental Law and the Evolving Concept of “Common Concern of Mankind”’, in Cottier, T., Nartova, O. and Bigdeli, S. (eds.), International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change: World Trade Forum, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, D., 2008. Smithsonian Ocean: Our Water, Our World, New York: HarperCollinsGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M., 2007. ‘International Responsibility and Liability’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Freestone, D. and Salman, M., 2007. ‘Ocean and Freshwater Resources’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Godden, L., 2009. ‘Death, Desire, Modernity and Redemption: Climate Change and Public International Law’, The Melbourne Journal of International Law, 10, 543–578Google Scholar
Gore, A., 1992. The Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit, Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Grotius, H., 1972. The Freedom of the Seas, Or, The Right Which Belongs to the Dutch to Take Part in the East Indian Trade, reprint New York: Arno PressGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G., 1968. ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162, 1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Hardt, M., 2009. ‘Politics of the Common’, Remaining Society Project, Z Net, 6 July
Jackson, T., 2009. Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet, London: EarthscanGoogle Scholar
Kaye, S., 2001. International Fisheries Management, Boston: Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., 2002. Mining in World History, London: ReaktionGoogle Scholar
Mgbeoji, I., 2003. ‘Beyond Rhetoric: State Sovereignty, Common Concern, and the Inapplicability of the Common Heritage Concept to Plant Genetic Resources’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 16, 821–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Washington, DC: Island PressGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., 2010. International Environmental Agreements Database Project, Version 2010.2,
Nesiah, V., 2006. ‘Resistance in the Age of Empire’, in Falk, R. (ed.), Third World Quarterly – Special Issue: Reshaping Justice: International Law and the Third World, 27, 903–922
Orford, A., 1997. ‘Locating the International: Military and Monetary Interventions after the Cold War’, Harvard International Law Journal, 38, 443–485Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahuja, S., 2011. Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perreault, T., 2008. ‘Popular Protest and Unpopular Policies: State Restructuring, Resource Conflict, and Social Justice in Bolivia’, in Carruthers, D. (ed.), Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promise, and Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Porter, D., 2001. The Enlightenment, Basingstoke: PalgraveCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopal, B., 2003. International Law From Below: Development, Social Movements, and Third World Resistance, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopal, B., 2006. ‘Counter-hegemonic International Law: Rethinking Human Rights and Development as a Third World Strategy’, Third World Quarterly, 27(5), 767–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, S., 2008. ‘Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 102, 475–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribbentrop, B., 1989. Forestry in British India, reprinted Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government PrintingGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, I., 2007. ‘Atmosphere and Outer Space’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C., 2003. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, Ulmen, G. L. (trans.), New York: Telos PressGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, N., 2008. The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law: Inception, Meaning and Status, Leiden: Martinus NijhoffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010. Global Biodiversity Outlook 3
Shiva, V., 2002. Water Wars: Privatisation, Pollution and Profit, Cambridge, MA: South End PressGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B., 2001. Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Sornarajah, M., 2004. The International Law of Foreign Investment, 2nd edn., Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, P., 2007. ‘Non-governmental Organisations and Civil Society’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
The Economist, 2010. Ploughing On, 1 July
Toope, S., 2007. ‘Formality and Informality’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD, 2005. South–South Cooperation in International Investment Agreements
UNCTAD, 2006. International Investment Arrangements: Trends and Emerging Issues
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007. Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Vandevelde, K., 2000. ‘The Economics of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Harvard International Law Journal, 41, 469–502Google Scholar
Vogler, J., 1995. The Global Commons: A Regime Analysis, Sussex: Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Witbooi, E., 2008. ‘Governing Global Fisheries: Commons, Community Law and Third-country Coastal Waters’, Social & Legal Studies, 17, 369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank, 2009. World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change
World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Our Common Future
World Data Centre for Glaciology, University of Cambridge
WWF, 2008. Living Planet Report, World Wildlife Fund

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×