Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:26:03.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Charles Taylor

from PART IV - TRIALS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Charles Chernor Jalloh
Affiliation:
Florida International University College of Law, Miami
William A. Schabas
Affiliation:
Middlesex University, London
Get access

Summary

The trial of the former president of Liberia, Charles Ghankay Taylor, by the United Nations-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone, was remarkable for several reasons. First, it was the only case before the Court involving a non-Sierra Leonean. Taylor is from neighbouring Liberia, where he is alleged to be responsible for crimes even worse than those committed during Sierra Leone's civil war. But Taylor, like all the other rebel leaders from his native country, has never been prosecuted for crimes committed in Liberia because the parties to that conflict effectively granted themselves amnesty. Rather, he was implicated by the Special Court for supporting Foday Sankoh, the leader of a rebel army called the Revolutionary United Front, to foment a war in Sierra Leone in which numerous atrocity crimes were committed. Sankoh and Taylor made ‘common cause’ to help each other take over their respective countries for personal and political gain.

Second, as a criminal trial, the case against Taylor was inevitably complicated. He reportedly never set foot in Sierra Leone during the time the offences for which he was charged were perpetrated. This meant that the prosecution's appropriate burden to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, when compared to the other cases before the Court, was going to be doubly difficult. Indeed, for most of the pre-trial and trial phases, the success of the case against Taylor appeared to hinge primarily on two expansive and controversial modes of criminal liability in international criminal law – joint criminal enterprise and command responsibility – neither of which requires the suspect to directly commit the acts in question. The task for the Court's prosecutors was how, using those two and other indirect theories of criminal participation such as instigating or ordering, they could link Taylor in Liberia to the offences carried out by the Revolutionary United Front and its collaborators in Sierra Leone. Interestingly, although it managed to secure Taylor's conviction for planning and aiding and abetting crimes in Sierra Leone, the prosecution failed to prove joint criminal enterprise and command responsibility.

Aside from Taylor, those persons tried by the Special Court were leaders of rebel, militia, or other organisations. Those convicted in the cases involving the Revolutionary United Front, the Civil Defence Forces, and the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council were part of the command structure of those entities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frulli, Micaela, ‘Piercing the Veil of Head of State Immunity: The Taylor Trial and Beyond’, in Jalloh, Charles, ed., The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 325–39.Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla, Negotiating Peace in Liberia: Preserving the Possibility for Justice, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue and International Centre for Transitional Justice, November 2007.Google Scholar
Jalloh, Charles, ‘Immunity from Prosecution for International Crimes: The Case of Charles Taylor at the Special Court for Sierra Leone’, ASIL Insights, October 2004.Google Scholar
Jalloh, Charles, ‘Special Court for Sierra Leone: Achieving Justice?’, (2011) 32 Michigan Journal of International Law395.Google Scholar
Jalloh, Charles, ‘Case Report: Prosecutor v. Charles Taylor, Appeal Judgment’, (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law58.Google Scholar
Mariniello, Triestino, ‘Case Report: Prosecutor v. Charles Taylor, Trial Judgment’, (2013) 107 American Journal of International Law424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miglin, James L., ‘From Immunity to Impunity: Charles Taylor and the Special Court for Sierra Leone’, (2007) 16 Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies21.Google Scholar
Nouwen, Sarah M., ‘The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued’, (2005) 18 Leiden Journal of International Law645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejan-Cole, Abdul, ‘A Big Man in a Small Cell: Charles Taylor and the Special Court for Sierra Leone’, in Lutz, Ellen and Reiger, Caitlin, eds., Prosecuting Heads of State, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 205–32.
Ward, Kathy, ‘Might vs. Right: Charles Taylor and the Sierra Leone Special Court’, (2003) 11 Human Rights Brief1.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Taylor (SCSL-03-01-T), Judgment, 18 May 2012.
Prosecutor v. Taylor (SCSL-03-01-A), Judgment, 26 September 2013.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Charles Taylor
  • Edited by William A. Schabas, Middlesex University, London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to International Criminal Law
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280540.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Charles Taylor
  • Edited by William A. Schabas, Middlesex University, London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to International Criminal Law
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280540.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Charles Taylor
  • Edited by William A. Schabas, Middlesex University, London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to International Criminal Law
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280540.017
Available formats
×