Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:35:06.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Atrocity crimes (genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes)

from PART III - CRIMES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

William A. Schabas
Affiliation:
Middlesex University, London
William A. Schabas
Affiliation:
Middlesex University, London
Get access

Summary

The expression ‘atrocity crimes’, apparently first proposed by David Scheffer, and subsequently adopted by the Special Advisers to the United Nations Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide and on the Responsibility to Protect, has emerged in recent years as shorthand for the offences that comprise the common denominator of the subject matter jurisdiction of the modern international criminal tribunals: genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Since the modern generation of international criminal courts and tribunals began activity in the mid 1990s, essentially all of the prosecutions have been for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Exceptionally, the prosecutions at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon are for terrorist crimes under Lebanese law. The Special Court for Sierra Leone was able to exercise jurisdiction over some serious offences in the criminal law of Sierra Leone but the Prosecutor never sought indictments under the relevant provisions. And, soon, the International Criminal Court will be able to deal with the crime of aggression, a subject discussed in the chapter in this book by Benjamin and Donald Ferencz. All of the tribunals also have jurisdiction over offences related to their own operations, in particular perjury and contempt of court.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘atrocity’ as ‘[a]n atrocious deed; an act of extreme cruelty or heinousness’, offering Thomas Jefferson as the historical example of its first use: ‘To defend themselves from the atrocities of a vastly more numerous and powerful people.’ Jefferson was justifying the young American government's provision of weapons to aboriginal peoples in Florida in order to protect themselves from Spanish colonialists. The association with this early manifestation of ‘humanitarian intervention’ is intriguing because ‘atrocity crimes’ are the unifying principle of the modern doctrine of the responsibility to protect, defined by the United Nations General Assembly in 2005.

In international law, the tripartite classification of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes can be traced to the First World War. On 24 May 1915, the United Kingdom, France, and Russia informed the Ottoman rulers of reports of ‘these new crimes of Turkey against humanity and civilisation’. This was the first use of the term ‘crime against humanity’ in an official context although it had been employed by writers since the middle of the eighteenth century.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, Crimes Against Humanity, Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L. and Reid, Natalie L., Elements of Crimes Under International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, Elements of War Crimes Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Sources and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Paola, ed., The UN Genocide Convention, A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henham, Ralph and Behrens, Paul, eds., The Criminal Law of Genocide, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Mettraux, Guénaël, International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya, ed., Forging a Convention for Crimes Against Humanity, Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William A., Genocide in International Law, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, Christian J., Berster, Lars and Schiffbauer, Björn, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Munich: Beck, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×