Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations of European Criminal Law
- Part II Purposes and Principles
- Part III European Substantive Criminal Law
- Part IV European Criminal Procedure
- Part V Institutions
- Part VI Perspectives
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Part V - Institutions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations of European Criminal Law
- Part II Purposes and Principles
- Part III European Substantive Criminal Law
- Part IV European Criminal Procedure
- Part V Institutions
- Part VI Perspectives
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law , pp. 327 - 438Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Further Reading
Jan, F. H. Inghelram, Legal and Institutional Aspects of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), Groningen: Europa Law Publishing 2011.Google Scholar
Stefanov, Constantin, White, Simone and Xanthaki, Helen, OLAF at the Crossroads: Action Against EU Fraud, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
OLAF Annual Reports (https://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/about-us/reports/annual-olaf-reports_fr).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Casagran, C. Blasi ‘The New Europol Legal Framework: Implications for EU Exchanges of Information in the Field of Law Enforcement’, in O’Neill, M. and Swinton, K. (eds.), Challenges and Critiques of the EU Internal Security Strategy: Rights, Power and Security, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Brodowski, D. ‘Article 102: Relations with Europol’, in Herrnfeld, H.-H., Brodowski, D. and Burchard, C. (eds.), European Public Prosecutor’s Office: Article-by-Article Commentary, Baden-Baden, München, Oxford: Nomos, Beck, Hart, 2021.Google Scholar
Cocq, C. and Galli F., F., ‘The Evolving Role of Europol in the Fight against Serious Crime: Current Challenges and Future Prospects’, in Hufnagel, S. and McCartney, C. (eds.), Trust in International Police and Justice Cooperation, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 2017.Google Scholar
Cooper, I., ‘A New Form of Democratic Oversight in the EU: The Joint Parliamentary Scrutiny Group for Europol’, (2018) 10 Perspectives on Federalism, 185.Google Scholar
Gless, S., ‘Europol’, in Mitsilegas, V., Bergström, M. and Konstadinides, T. (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2016.Google Scholar
Gless, S. and Wahl, T., ‘A Comparison of the Evolution and Pace of Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters: A Race between Europol and Eurojust?’, in Brière, C. and Weyembergh, A. (eds.), The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law. Past, Present and Future, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 2018.Google Scholar
Gruszczak, A., ‘The EU Criminal Intelligence Model’, in Banach-Gutierrez, J.B. and Harding, C. (eds.), EU Criminal Law and Policy. Values, Principles and Methods, Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Hufnagel, S. S., Policing Global Regions. The Legal Context of Transnational Law Enforcement Cooperation, Abingdon, Oxon–New York, NY: Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V. and Giuffrida, F., ‘Bodies, Offices and Agencies’, in Mitsilegas, V., EU Criminal Law, 2nd edn., London: Hart, in press.Google Scholar
Vavoula, N. and Mitsilegas, V., ‘Strengthening Europol’s Mandate. A Legal Assessment of the Commission’s Proposal to Amend the Europol Regulation’, Study for the LIBE Committee of the European Parliament, 2021.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Brière, C., ‘Cooperation of Europol and Eurojust with External Partners in the Fight against Crime: A Legal Appraisal’, in Hofmann, H.C.H., Vos, E., and Chamon, M., The External Dimension of EU Agencies and Bodies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
Coninsx, M., ‘Eurojust’, in Mitsilegas, V., and Bergström, M. (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016, 441–456.Google Scholar
Covolo, V., ‘From Europol to Eurojust: Towards a European Public Prosecutor’, (2012) 7 eucrim, 83–88.Google Scholar
Amicis, G. De, and Kostoris, R., ‘Vertical Cooperation’, in Kostoris, P. (ed.), Handbook of European Criminal Procedure, Cham: Springer, 2018, 223–234.Google Scholar
López, A. Hernández, El papel de Eurojust en la resolución de conflictos de jurisdicción penal en la Unión Europea. Propuestas legislativas, Cizur Menor: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, 2020, 35–147.Google Scholar
Luchtman, M., and Vervaele, J.A.E., ‘European Agencies for Criminal Justice and Shared Enforcement (Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office)’, (2014) 10 Utrecht L. Rev., 132–150.Google Scholar
Suominen, A., ‘The Past, Present and the Future of Eurojust’, (2009 15 Maastricht J. Eur. Comp. L., 217–234.Google Scholar
Weyembergh, A., ‘An Overall Analysis of the Proposal for a Regulation on Eurojust’, (2013) 4 eucrim, 129–130.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Asp, P. (ed.), The European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Legal and Criminal Policy Perspectives, Stockholm: Stiftelsen Skrifter utgivna av Juridiska Fakulteren vid Stockholms Universitet, 2015.Google Scholar
Winter, L. Bachmaier (ed.), The European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The Challenges Ahead, Cham: Springer, 2018.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J.A.E., The Implementation of the Corpus Juris in the Member States, Vol. I, Cambridge: Intersentia, 2000.Google Scholar
Geelhoed, W., Erkelens, L.H. and Meij, A. (eds.), Shifting Perspectives on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, The Hague: Asser Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, G., Sicurella, R., Illuminati, G., and Allegrezza, S. (eds.), Le sfide dell’attuazione di una Procura europea: definizione di regole comuni e loro impatto sugli ordinamenti interni, Milano: Giuffrè, 2013.Google Scholar
Herrnfeld, H.-H., Brodowski, D. and Burchard, C. (eds.), European Public Prosecutor’s Office: EPPO, Baden Baden: Nomos, 2021.Google Scholar
Ligeti, K. (ed.), Toward a Public Prosecutor for the European Union, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Ligeti, K., Antunes, M.J., and Giuffrida, F., The European Public Prosecutor’s Office at Launch, Milano: Wolter Kluwer, 2020.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V. and Giuffrida, F. (eds.), ‘Raising the Bar? Thoughts on the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office’, (2017) CEPS Research Report www.ceps.eu/system/files/PI%202017-39%20Mitsilegas_Giuffrida_0.pdf (accessed 3 March 2022).Google Scholar