Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Augustine’s Confessions
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to Augustine’s Confessions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Circumstances of Composition
- Part II Main Themes and Topics
- Part III Reception and Reading Strategies
- A Bibliographical Note
- Index
- Other Titles in the Series (continued from page ii)
- References
Part II - Main Themes and Topics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Augustine’s Confessions
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to Augustine’s Confessions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Circumstances of Composition
- Part II Main Themes and Topics
- Part III Reception and Reading Strategies
- A Bibliographical Note
- Index
- Other Titles in the Series (continued from page ii)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Augustine's 'Confessions' , pp. 61 - 242Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Further Reading
Ferrari, L. C. The Conversions of Saint Augustine, Saint Augustine Lecture Series. Villanova: Villanova University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Madec, G. “Conversio.” In Augustinus-Lexikon, eds. Mayer, C., Feldmann, E., Dodaro, R., and Müller, C.. Basel: Schwabe, 1994, vol. 1, 1282–1294Google Scholar
Madec, G. La patrie et la voie: le Christ dans la vie et la pensée de saint Augustin. Paris, Desclée, 1989.Google Scholar
Mandouze, A. Saint Augustin: L’aventure de la raison et de la grâce. Paris, Études Augustiniennes, 1968.Google Scholar
Masai, F. “Les conversions de S. Augustin et les débuts du spiritualisme en Occident,” Revue du Moyen Âge latin 67 (1961), 1–40.Google Scholar
Oroz-Reta, J. “Conversion.” In Saint Augustin, la Méditerranée et l’Europe: IVe–XXIe siècle, ed. Fitzgerald, A.. Paris: Cerf, 2005, 377–382.Google Scholar
Vannier, M.-A. Creatio, conversio, formatio chez S. Augustin. Paradosis 31. Fribourg: Éditions universitaires, 1991 (rev. ed. 1997).Google Scholar
Vannier, M.-A. Les Confessions de Saint Augustin. Collection Classiques du Christianisme. Paris: Cerf, 2007.Google Scholar
Vannier, M.-A. Saint Augustin ou la conversion en acte. Sagesses éternelles. Paris: Entrelacs, 2011.Google Scholar
Zum Brunn, E. Le dilemme de l’être et du néant chez Saint Augustin. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1969.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Brachtendorf, J. “… damit sie weinen lernen im Tal der Tränen. Augustin und die christliche Rehabilitation der Affekte.” In Unruhig ist unser Herz. Interpretationen zu Augustins Confessiones, ed. Fiedrowicz, M.. Trier: Paulinus, 2004, 123–139.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. “The Role of Creatio ex Nihilo in Augustine’s Confessions.” Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum 85 (2003), 415–419.Google Scholar
O’Daly, G. “Time as Distentio and St. Augustine’s Exegesis of Philippians 3, 12–14.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 23 (1977), 265–271.Google Scholar
Ortiz, J. “You Made Us for Yourself”: Creation in St Augustine’s Confessions. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2016.Google Scholar
Torchia, N. J. Creatio ex nihilo and the Theology of St. Augustine: The Anti-Manichaean Polemic and Beyond. American University Studies VII, Theology and Religion 205. New York: Peter Lang, 1999.Google Scholar
Torrance Kirby, W. J. “Praise as the Soul’s Overcoming of Time in the Confessions of St. Augustine,” Pro Ecclesia 6/2 (1997), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werpehowski, W. “Weeping at the Death of Dido: Sorrow, Virtue, and Augustine’s Confessions,” Journal of Religious Ethics 19/1 (1991), 175–191.Google Scholar
Williams, R. “Good for Nothing? Augustine on Creation,” Augustinian Studies 25 (1994), 9–23.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Beatrice, P. F. The Transmission of Sin: Augustine and the Pre-Augustinian Sources, trans. Kamesar, A.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, G. “Concupiscentia.” In Augustinus-Lexikon, ed. Mayer, C. (Basel: Schwabe, 1986–), vol. 1, 1113–1122.Google Scholar
Cipriani, N. “Libido.” In Augustinus-Lexikon, ed. Mayer, C. (Basel: Schwabe, 1986–), vol. 3, 981–985.Google Scholar
Couenhoven, J. “St. Augustine’s Doctrine of Original Sin,” Augustinian Studies 36 (2005) 359–396.Google Scholar
Nisula, T. Augustine and the Functions of Concupiscence. Supplement to Vigiliae Christianae 116. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. Augustine: Confessions. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992 (reprint 2012), three vols.Google Scholar
Van Oort, J. “Augustine and Mani on Concupiscentia Sexualis.” In Augustiniana Traiectina. Communications présentées au Colloque International d’Utrecht, 13–14 novembre 1986, eds. den Boeft, J. and van Oort, J.. Paris: Études Augustiniennes 1987, 137–152.Google Scholar
Van Oort, J. “Augustine on Sexual Concupiscence and Original Sin.” Studia Patristica 22 (1989), 382–386.Google Scholar
Van Oort, J. “Was Julian Right? A Re-Evaluation of Augustine’s and Mani’s Doctrines of Sexual Concupiscence and the Transmission of Sin.” Journal of Early Christian History 6 (2016), 111–125.Google Scholar
Van Oort, J. “Sin and Concupiscence in Augustine’s Confessions: An Analytical Overview of the Relevant Texts and Some Conclusions.” Augustiniana 68 (2018), 193–207.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bochet, Isabelle, “Le firmament de l’écriture”: L’herméneutique Augustinienne. Collection des Études Augustiniennes. Série Antiquité 172. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2004.Google Scholar
Brachtendorf, J. Augustins “Confessiones.” Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2005.Google Scholar
Byers, S. C. Perception, Sensibility, and Moral Motivation in Augustine: A Stoic-Platonic Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Drecoll, V. H., Die Entstehung der Gnadenlehre Augustins. Beiträge zur historischen Theologie 109. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar
Feldmann, E. “Confessiones,” in Augustinus-Lexikon, ed. Mayer, C.. Basel: Schwabe, 1994, vol. 1, 1134–1193.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, P. “The Confessions as Autobiography.” In A Companion to Augustine, ed. Vessey, M.. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, 87–98.Google Scholar
Köckert, C. “Therapie der Affekte: Augustins Confessiones als Dokument christlich-philosophischer Seelsorge.” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 127 (2016), 293–314.Google Scholar
Kotzé, A. Augustine’s Confessions: Communicative Purpose and Audience. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 71. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Madec, G. “‘Platonisme’ et ‘Christianisme’: Analyse du livre VII des ‘Confessions’.” In Lectures Augustiniennes. Collection des Études Augustiniennes. Série Antiquité 168. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2001, 121–184.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J., Augustine, Sinner and Saint: A New Biography. London: Profile Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Pizzolato, L. F. “Libro ottavo.” In Sant’ Agostino. Confessioni (Libri VII–IX). Fondazione Lorenzo Valla. Scrittori greci e latini. Milan: Arnoldo Mondadori, 1994, vol. 3, 229–292.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. L’ordre caché. La notion de l’ordre chez saint Augustin. Collection des Études Augustiniennes. Série Antiquité 174. Paris: Études Augustiniènnes, 2004.Google Scholar
Brachtendorf, J., Augustins “Confessiones.” Darmstadt: Wissenschaffliche Buchgesellschaft, 2005.Google Scholar
Feldmann, E. “Confessiones.” In Augustinus-Lexikon, ed. Mayer, C.. Basel: Schwabe, 1994, vol. 1, 1134–1193.Google Scholar
Fischer, N. and Mayer, C. (eds.), Die Confessiones des Augustinus von Hippo: Einführung und Interpretationen zu den dreizehn Büchern. Forschungen zur europäischen Geistesgeschichte 1. Freiburg: Herder, 1998.Google Scholar
Kotzé, A. Augustine’s Confessions: Communicative Purpose and Audience. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 71. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Madec, G. “Deus,” in Augustinus-Lexikon, ed. Mayer, C.. Basel: Schwabe, vol. 2, fasc. 1/2 (1996), 314–322; fasc. 3/4 (1999), 322–366.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. Confessions: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, two vols.Google Scholar
Van Geest, P. The Incomprehensibility of God: Augustine as a Negative Theologian. Late Antique History and Religion 4. Leuven: Peeters, 2010.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. “Body Language in Augustine’s Confessions and De doctrina christiana.” Augustinian Studies 49/1 (2018), 1–23.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. “Alypius, l’ami sceptique d’Augustin?” In Augustin philosophe et prédicateur. Hommage à Goulven Madec: actes du colloque international organisé à Paris les 8 et 9 septembre 2011, ed. Bochet, I.. Colletion des Études Augustiniennes, Série Antiquité 195. Paris: Institut d’études Augustiniennes, 2012, 295–314.Google Scholar
Bouton-Touboulic, A.-I. L’ordre caché. La notion d’ordre chez saint Augustin, Collection des études augustiniennes, Série Antiquité 174. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2004.Google Scholar
Folliet, G. “‘Deificari in otio’, Augustin, Epistula 10, 2.” RechAug 2 (1962), 225–236.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, T. “Contro I Platonici con Epicuro. Agostino sulla fisiologia del corpo umano.” Eikasmos 26 (2015), 303–318.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. “Amicitia.” In Augustinus-Lexikon, ed. Mayer, C.. Basel: Schwabe, 1986–, vol. 1, 287–293.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. “Problems in the History of Christian Friendship.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 4/1 (1996), 87–113.Google Scholar
MacNamara, M. A. Friendship in Saint Augustine. Studia Friburgensia 20. Fribourg: The University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Nawar, T. “Augustine and the Dangers of Friendship.” The Classical Quarterly 65/2 (2015), 836–851.Google Scholar
O’Daly, G. P. “Friendship and Transgression: Luminosus limes amicitiae (Augustine, Confessions 2.2.2) and the Theme of Confessions 2.” In Reading Ancient Texts, Aristotle and Neoplatonism, eds. Stern-Gillet, S. and Corrigan, K.. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 162. Leiden: Brill, 2007, vol. II, 211–223.Google Scholar
Pépin, J. “Le problème de la communication des consciences chez Plotin et saint Augustin.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 55/2 (1950), 128–148.Google Scholar
Pétré, H. Caritas: Étude sur le vocabulaire latin de la charité chrétienne. Études et documents 22. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1948.Google Scholar
Pizzolato, L. F. “L’amicizia in S. Agostino e il “Laelius” di Cicerone.” Vigiliae Christianae 28 (1974), 203–215.Google Scholar
Pizzolato, L. F. L’idea di amicizia nel mundo classico e cristiano. Turin: G. Einaudi, 1993.Google Scholar
Touboulic, A.-I. “De la mort de l’ami à la présence divine (Conf. IV, 4, 7–12, 19).” Vita Latina, 153 (1999), 58–69.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, T. J. “The Influence of Cicero’s Ideal of Friendship on Augustine.” In Augustiniana Traiectina: communications présentées au colloque international d’Utrecht, 13–14 novembre 1986, eds. den Boeft, J. and van Oort, J.. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1986, 59–72.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Boone, M. “The Role of Platonism in Augustine’s 386 Conversion to Christianity.” Religion Compass 9/5 (May 2015), 151–161.Google Scholar
Brittian, C. “Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Psychological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18 (2003), 223–263.Google Scholar
Byers, S. “Augustine and the Philosophers.” In A Companion to Augustine, ed. Vessey, M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2012, 175–187.Google Scholar
Cooper, S. “The Platonist Christianity of Marius Victorinus.” Religions 7/122 (October 1, 2016), 1–24.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. P. Contemplation and Classical Christianity: A Study in Augustine. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. “Plotinus and Christian Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, ed. Gerson, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. “Time, Mysticism, and Creation.” In Augustine’s Confessions: Critical Essays, ed. Mann, W.. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006, 209–235.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Flasch, K. Was ist Zeit? Augustinus von Hippo, Das XI. Buch der Confessiones: historisch-philosophische Studie: Text-Übersetzung-Kommentar. Klostermann Rote Reihe 13. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1993.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. “Temps et étérnité dans le livre XI des Confessions: Augustin, Plotin, Porphyre et saint Paul.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 63 (2017), 31–79.Google Scholar
Meijering, E. P. Augustin über Schöpfung, Ewigkeit und Zeit: das elfte Buch der Bekenntnisse. Philosophia Patrum 4. Leiden: Brill, 1979.Google Scholar
Mesch, W. Reflektierte Gegenwart. Eine Studie über Zeit und Ewigkeit bei Platon, Aristoteles, Plotin und Augustinus. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2003.Google Scholar
Mourant, J. A. Saint Augustine on Memory. Saint Augustine Lecture Series. Villanova: Villanova University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. Temps et récit / T. 1, L’intrigue et le récit historique. Éditions Points. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1983.Google Scholar
Teske, R. J. “Augustine’s Philosophy of Memory.” The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, ed. Stump, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teske, R. J. Paradoxes of Time in Saint Augustine. Aquinas Lecture 1996. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Von Herrmann, F.-W. Augustinus und die phänomenologische Frage nach der Zeit. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1992 (English translation by F. Van Fleteren and J. Hackett [Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen, 2008]).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Byers, S. “Augustine and the Philosophers.” In A Companion to Augustine, ed. Vessey, M.. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, 175–187.Google Scholar
Cary, P., Doody, J., and Paffenroth, K. (eds.), Augustine and Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Catapano, G. L’idea di filosofia in Agostino. Guida bibliografica, Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 1. Padova: Il Poligrafo, 2000.Google Scholar
Catapano, G. “Philosophia.” In Augustinus-Lexikon, ed. Mayer, C.. Basel: Schwabe, 2016, vol. 4, 719–742.Google Scholar
Domínguez, P. Augustins Philosophiebegriff: Fides und Ratio im Hinblick auf die Glücksfrage. Augustinus, Werk und Wirkung 4. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2016.Google Scholar
Madec, G. “Philosophia: secundum Ambrosium - secundum Augustinum.” Medioevo 28 (2003), 7–16.Google Scholar
Madec, G. Saint Augustin et la philosophie. Notes critiques. Collection des Études Augustiniennes. Série Antiquité 149. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 1996.Google Scholar
Mann, W. E. (ed.), Augustine’s Confessions: Philosophy in Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Baumann, N. Die Demut als Grundlage aller Tugenden bei Augustinus. Patrologia 21. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2009.Google Scholar
Bruning, B. “Augustine’s Concept of Pride: Ut cancer serpit (en. Ps. 1,1).” Augustiniana 63/1–4 (2013), 9–81.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P. “Le Typhus, maladie de l’âme d’après Philon et d’après Saint Augustin.” In Corona gratiarum: miscellanea patristica, historica et liturgica Eligio Dekkers O.S.B. XII lustra complenti oblata. Instrumenta patristica 10–11. Brugge: S. Pieter-sabdij, 1975, 245–288.Google Scholar
Hombert, P.-M. Gloria Gratiae. Se glorifier en Dieu, principe et fin de la théologie augustinienne de la grâce. Collection des Études Augustiniennes, Série Antiquité 148. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1996.Google Scholar
Jamieson, I. W. A., “Augustine’s Confessions: The Structure of Humility.” Augustiniana 24 (1974), 234–246.Google Scholar
Mayer, C. “Humiliatio, humilitas.” In Augustinus-Lexikon, ed. Mayer, C.. Basel: Schwabe, 2004–2010, vol. 3, 443–456.Google Scholar
Procopé, J. F. “Hochmut.” In Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, eds. Dassmann, E., et al. Stuttgart: Hiersemann 1991, vol. 15, 795–858.Google Scholar
Schaffner, O. Christliche Demut. Des hl. Augustinus Lehre von der Humilitas. Cassiciacum 17. Würzburg: Augustinus, 1959.Google Scholar
Testard, M. “La ‘superbia’ dans les Confessions de saint Augustin.” In Homo Spiritualis. Festgabe für Luc Verheijen OSA zu seinem 70. Geburtstag, ed. Mayer, C.. Cassiciacum 38. Würzburg: Augustinus, 1987, 136–170.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bourke, V. Augustine’s Love of Wisdom: An Introspective Philosophy. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Cary, P. Augustine’s Invention of the Inner Self: The Legacy of a Christian Platonist. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Cary, P. Inner Grace: Augustine in the Traditions of Plato and Paul. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cary, P. Outward Signs: The Powerlessness of External Things in Augustine’s Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. P. The Mysticism of Saint Augustine: Rereading the Confessions. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
O’Connell, R. J. St. Augustine’s Confessions: The Odyssey of Soul. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
O’Meara, J. J. Young Augustine: The Growth of St. Augustine’s Mind up to His Conversion. London: Longman, 1980.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius, . “Mystical Theology.” In Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works, trans. Luibheid, C.. Classics of Western Spirituality. New York: Paulist, 1987.Google Scholar