Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T14:03:21.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER I - NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA AND SYRIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
J.-R. Kupper
Edited by
I. E. S. Edwards ,
C. J. Gadd ,
N. G. L. Hammond  and
E. Sollberger
Get access

Summary

SHAMSHI-ADAD I

Scarcely thirty years ago the figure of Hammurabi, the unifier of Babylonia, still stood out in striking isolation. In fact, at the time he ascended the throne another centralized empire already occupied the whole of northern Mesopotamia: it was the personal creation of Shamshi-Adad I, to whom recent discoveries have made it possible to give his place in history.

Whereas Hammurabi had inherited a considerable territory from his father, Shamshi-Adad had more modest beginnings. He belonged to one of the numerous nomad clans which had infiltrated into Mesopotamia after the break-up of the Third Dynasty of Ur. His father, Ila-kabkabu, ruled over a land bordering on the kingdom of Mari, with which he had come into conflict. It is not well known what happened next. According to one version, the authenticity of which is not certain, Shamshi-Adad made his way into Babylonia, while his brother succeeded to Ila-kabkabu. Later on he seized Ekallatum; the capture of this fortress, on the left bank of the Tigris, in the southern reaches of the lower Zab, laid the gates of Assyria open to him. The moment was propitious, for Assyria had only lately regained her independence, having previously had to submit to Naram-Sin of Eshnunna, who had advanced as far as the upper Khabur. But Naram-Sin's conquests had been ephemeral: on his death, Assyria had shaken off the yoke of Eshnunna, only to fall beneath that of Shamshi-Adad. Once installed on the throne of Ashur, the latter soon set about extending his dominion in the direction of the West.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Ancient History
, pp. 1 - 41
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, W. F. ‘Further Observations on the Chronology of Alalakh.’ In Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 146 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, A. Die Herkunft der Hyksos in neuer Sicht (Berichte der sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaft 101/6). Berlin, 1954.Google Scholar
Archives royales de Mari (Archives Royales de Mari (translation vols) texts in transliteration and translation), i–xiii. Paris, 1950–64.
Birot, M. ‘Textes économiques de Mari.’ In Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 47 (1953); 49 (1955); 50 (1956).Google Scholar
Birot, M. ‘Les lettres de Iasîm-Sumû.’ In Syria, 41 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borger, R. ‘Šamši-Adad I. und seine Nachfolger.’ In Handbuch der Orientalistik, Erste Abt., Ergänzungsband V, Heft I (Leiden, 1961).Google Scholar
Borger, R. ‘Das Problem der ‘apīru (“Ḫabiru”).’ In Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 74 (1958).Google Scholar
Bottéro, J. Le problème des Ḫabiru á la 4e Rencontre assyriologique internationale (Cahiers de la Société Asiatique, 12). Paris, 1954.Google Scholar
Burke, M. L. ‘Lettres de Numušda-naḫrâri et de trois autres correspondants á Idiniatum.’ In Syria, 41 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Les archives éonomiques du Palais de Mari.’ In Syria, 20 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Les archives épistolaires du Palais de Mari.’ In Syria, 19 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Les noms d'années et d'éponymes dans les “Archives de Mari”.’ In Studia Mariana (Leiden, 1950).Google Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Šamši-Addu Ier, roi d'Assyrie (1726–1694 av. J.-C.).’ In Bulletin de l'Académie Royale de Belgique, Classe des Lettres, 1948.Google Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘L'inscription de fondation de Iaḫdun-Lim, roi de Mari.’ In Syria, 32 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Une lettre de Iarîm-Lim, roi d'Alep, à Iašûb-Iaḫad, roi de Dîr.’ In Syria, 33 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Le royaume d'Alep au XVIIIe siécle avant notre ère d'après les “Archives de Mari”.’ In Bulletin de l'Académie Royale de Belgique, Classe des Lettres, 1952.Google Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Le royaume de Qatna au XVIIIe siècle avant notre ère d'après les “Archives royales de Mari”.’ In Bulletin de l'Académie Royale de Belgique, Classe des Lettres, 1954.Google Scholar
Dossin, G. ‘Les Bédouins dans les textes de Mari.’ In L'antica società beduina (Rome, 1959).Google Scholar
Finet, A. ‘Iawi-Ilâ, roi deTalḫayûm.’ In Syria, 41 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadd, C. J. ‘Tablets from Chagar Bazar and Tall Brak.’ In Iraq, 7 (1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, I. J. Hurrians and Subarians (Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 22). Chicago, 1944.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. ‘The Early History of the West Semitic Peoples.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 15 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘On the Chronology of the Second Millennium B.C.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 11 (1957).Google Scholar
Goossens, G. Het ontstaan van het Assyrisch rijk (Mededeelingen van de Koninklijke vlaamse Academic van België, Klasse der Letteren, XXII, 3). Brussels, 1960.Google Scholar
Güterbock, H. G. ‘The Hurrian Element in the Hittite Empire.’ In Cahiers d'histoire mondiale (See , J. W. H.) 11, 2 (1954).Google Scholar
Hrouda, B. ‘Die Churriter als Problem archäologischer Forschung.’ In Archaeologia Geographica, 7 (1958).Google Scholar
Huffmon, H. B. Amorite Personal Names in the Mart Texts: A Structural and Lexical Study. Baltimore, 1965.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Th. ‘Historical Data.’ In Oriental Institute Publications 43 (Chicago, 1940).Google Scholar
Klengel, H. Geschichte Syriens im 2. Jahrtausend v.u. Z. Teil 1–Nordsyrien. Berlin, 1965.Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. Les nomades en Mésopotamie au temps des rois de Mari. Paris, 1957.Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. ‘Baḫdi-Lim, préfet du palais de Mari.’ In Bulletin de l'Académie Royale de Belgique, Classe des Lettres, 1954.Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. ‘Un gouvemement provincial dans le royaume de Mari.’ In Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 41 (1947).Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. ‘Le rôle des nomades dans l'histoire de la Méopotamie an-cienne.’ In Journ. of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 11, 2 (1959).Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. ‘Sutéens et Ḫapiru.’ In Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 55 (1961). See especially p. n. 2 for recent bibliography on the Habiru.Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. ‘Correspondance de Kibri-Dagan.’ In Syria, 41 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laessøe, J. The Shemshāra Tablets. A Preliminary Report. Copenhagen, 1959.Google Scholar
Landsberger, B. ‘Assyrische Königsliste und “Dunkles Zeitalter”.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 8 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leemans, W. F. Foreign Trade in the Old Babylonian Period. Leiden, 1960.Google Scholar
Lewy, H. ‘The Synchronism Assyria–Eˇnunna–Babylon.’ In Die Welt des Orients II, 5/6 (1959).Google Scholar
Lewy, H. ‘The Historical Background of the Correspondence of Baḫdi-Lim.’ In Orientalia 25 (1956).Google Scholar
Lewy, H. ‘On Some Problems of Kassite and Assyrian Chronology.’ In Annuaire de l'Inst, de Philologie et d'Histoire orientates et slaves, xiii, 1953 (Brussels, 1955).Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, M. Die Indo-Arier im Alten Vorderasien. Wiesbaden, 1966.Google Scholar
Munn-Rankin, J. M. ‘Diplomacy in Western Asia in the Early Second Millennium B.C.’ In Iraq, 18 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, W. and Strommenger, E. ‘Alalaḫ und Siegelkunst.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 12 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nougayrol, J. ‘Documents du Ḫabur.’ In Syria, 37 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Callaghan, R. T. Aram Naharaim (Analecta Orientalia 26), ch. iii. Rome, 1948.Google Scholar
Otten, H. ‘Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Boǧazköy im Jahre 1957.’ In Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 91 (1958).Google Scholar
Parrot, A. Mission archéologique de Mari, II: Le Palais. 3 parts (Inst. fr. d'Arch. de Beyrouth, Biblioth. arch, et hist. 68–70). Paris, 1958–9.Google Scholar
Smith, S. ‘Yarim-Lim of Yamḫad.’ In Rivista degli Studi Orientali 32 (1957).Google Scholar
Smith, S. Alalakh and Chronology. London, 1940.Google Scholar
Speiser, E. A. ‘The Alalakh Tablets.’ In Journal of the American Oriental Society 74 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speiser, E. A. ‘The Hurrian Participation in the Civilizations of Mesopotamia, Syria and Palestine.’ In Cahiers d'histoire mondiale (See , J. W. H.) 1, 2 (1953).Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. ‘Iaḫdunlim, roi de H̬ana.’ In Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 33 (1936).Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. ‘La chronologie de la première dynastie babylonienne’ (Mémoires de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 43, 2). Paris, 1942.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. ‘Tablettes hurrites provenant de Mari.’ In Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 36 (1939).Google Scholar
Tocci, Fr. M. La Siria nell'età di Mari. Rome, 1960.Google Scholar
Seters, J. The Hyksos. A New Investigation. New Haven and London, 1966.Google Scholar
Soden, W. Herrscher im Alten Orient. Berlin–Göttingen-Heidelberg, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, D. J. The Alalakh Tablets (Occasional Publications of the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, 2). London, 1953.Google Scholar
Wiseman, D. J. ‘Abban and Alalaḫ.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 12 (1958). (amendment in Journal of Cuneiform Studies 13 (1959)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, D. J. ‘Ration Lists from Alalakh VII.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 13 (1959).Google Scholar
Woolley, L. Alalakh. An Account of the Excavations at Tell Atchana in the Hatay, 1937–1949. Oxford, 1955.Google Scholar
Woolley, L. A Forgotten Kingdom. London, 1953.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×