Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:10:30.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Liberal Democracy as a Culture of Rights: England, the United States, and Continental Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Elisabeth Glaser
Affiliation:
German Historical Institute, Washington DC
Hermann Wellenreuther
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Get access

Summary

“The Commons of England for hereditary fundamental Liberties and Properties are blest above and beyond the Subject of any Monarch in the World.” Thus wrote Edward Chamberlayne in 1669 in his highly successful work Angliae Notitia, which was to run through no less than thirty-eight editions until 1755 and was translated into German and other continental languages.

Chamberlayne did not mean the members of the House of Commons; he had in mind free Englishmen who did not belong to clergy or nobility, and he proceeded to enumerate, in what may be considered an early, though unofficial catalog of the rights of Englishmen, these liberties and properties in eight points. I shall mention only a few of them. The first point: “No Freeman of England ought to be imprisoned or otherwise restrained, without cause shewn for which by Law he ought to be so imprisoned.” In point two, the Writ of Habeas Corpus was mentioned; in point four, it was stated: “No soldiers can be quartered in the House of any Freeman in time of Peace, without his will.” In point five, the Englishmen’s property rights were extolled: “Every Freeman hath such a full and absolute property in Goods, that no Taxes, Loans, or Benevolences ordinarily and legally can be imposed on them, without their own consent by their Representatives in Parliament.” hamberlayne went on to describe the unrestricted freedom to bequeath one’s property, “which other Nations governed by the Civil Law, cannot do.” Those familiar with the 1628 Petition of Right will recognize in points four and five various similarities in content and partly even in wording. Point six stated that no Englishman could be compelled (unless bound by his tenure) to fight in foreign wars.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bridging the Atlantic
The Question of American Exceptionalism in Perspective
, pp. 11 - 42
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×