Aristotle on the Lung and the Bellows–Lungs Analogy

doi:10.1017/9781009085786.008

Chapter 7 - Aristotle on the Lung and the Bellows–Lungs Analogy

from Part III - Towards the Mechanization of the Human Body

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023

Giouli Korobili

Edited by

Maria Gerolemou and

George Kazantzidis

Show author details

Maria Gerolemou: Affiliation:
Center for Hellenic Studies, Washington
George Kazantzidis: Affiliation:
University of Patras, Greece

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In a well-known passage (Juv. 13 (7).473a15–474a24), Aristotle preserves a fragment of Empedocles’ poem dealing with respiration, in which the clepsydra is used as a model for breathing. Although there is a substantial literature on this subject, most scholars have focused on explaining Empedocles’ account of the mode of operation of the clepsydra as well as on assessing the extent to which Aristotle’s interpretation does justice to Empedocles’ fragment. What has received little attention is the fact that Aristotle begins his criticism of Empedocles by offering a specific counterproposal of his own, one that rests on the idea that the mechanism of respiration can be explained in a much clearer fashion through the analogy of a forge bellows. References to bellows are actually already traceable to Homer. At the same time, the bellows–lungs analogy continued to be used for centuries after Aristotle. The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the existing literary and archaeological evidence about bellows in Greek antiquity in order to build a complete picture of its function and hence clarify Aristotle’s theory of respiration.

Keywords

Aristotle Empedocles bellows lung respiration analogy clepsydra.

Type: Chapter
Information: Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity , pp. 181 - 202

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009085786.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althoff, J. 1992. Warm, kalt, flüssig und fest bei Aristoteles: Die elementarqualitäten in den zoologischen Schriften (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Barnes, J., ed. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 1-vol. digital edition, Bollingen Series lxxi.2 (Princeton).Google Scholar

Berryman, S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Booth, N. B. 1960. ‘Empedocles’ Account of Breathing’, JHS, 80: 10–15.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bremer, D. 1980. ‘Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher’, Poetica, 12: 350–76.Google Scholar

Craddock, P. T. 2008. ‘Mining and Metallurgy’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 93–120.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. 2005. Galeni De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, vol. 2, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum v 4,1,2 (Berlin).Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. 2017. ‘Aristotle’s Heart and the Heartless Man’, in Wee, J. Z., ed., The Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman Medicine (Leiden), 122–41.Google Scholar

Fleming, G. 1873 ². The Comparative Anatomy of the Domesticated Animals by A. Chauveau, translated and edited by George Fleming (London).Google Scholar

Forbes, R. J. 1964. Studies in Ancient Technology, vol. 4 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Gans, C. and Hughes, G. M.. 1967. ‘The Mechanism of Lung Ventilation in the Tortoise Testudo Graeca Linne’, J. Exp. Biol., 47: 1–20.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. 1939. Aristotle: On the Heavens (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Hahn, R. 2010, Archaeology and the Origins of Philosophy (Albany, N. York).Google Scholar

Harris, C. R. S. 1973. The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine (Oxford).Google Scholar

Healy, J. F. 1978. Mining and Metallurgy in the Greek and Roman World (London).Google Scholar

Holmes, B. 2010. The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece (Princeton).CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2017. ‘Aristotelian Mechanistic Explanation’, in Rocca, J., ed., Teleology in the Ancient World (Cambridge), 125–50.Google Scholar

Korobili, G. 2022. Aristotle. On Youth and Old Age, Life and Death, and Respiration 1–6. With Translation, Introduction and Interpretation (Cham).Google Scholar

Last, H. 1924. ‘Empedokles and His Klepsydra Again’, CQ, 18: 169–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001. Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals i–iv (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Longrigg, J. 1993. Greek Rational Medicine (London).CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattusch, C. 2008. ‘Metalworking and Tools’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 418–38.Google Scholar

O’Brien, D. 1970. ‘The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing and Breathing’, JHS, 90: 140–79.Google Scholar

Oser-Grote, C. M. 2004. Aristoteles und das Corpus Hippocraticum (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Powell, J. U. 1923. ‘The Simile of the Clepsydra in Empedocles’, CQ, 17: 172–4.Google Scholar

Rashed, M. 2008. ‘De qui la clepsydre est-elle le nom? Une interpretation du fragment 100 d’Empédocle’, REG, 121.2: 443–68.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1955. Aristotle: Parva Naturalia. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford).CrossRef Google Scholar

Siwek, P. 1963. Aristoteles: Parva Naturalia graece et latine (Rome).Google Scholar

Smith, W. 1859 ². Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (Boston).Google Scholar

Von Staden, H. 1997. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S., eds., Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart), 183–208.Google Scholar

Thivel, A. 2005, ‘Air, Pneuma and Breathing from Homer to Hippocrates’, in van der Eijk, P. J., ed., Hippocrates in Context: Papers read at the xith International Hippocrates Colloquium University of Newcastle upon Tyne 27–31 August 2002 (Leiden), 239–49.Google Scholar

Timpanaro Cardini, M. 1957. ‘Respirazione e Clessidra’, PP, 12: 250–70.Google Scholar

Tsaimou, K. G. 1997. Αρχαιογνωσία των μετάλλων: αρχαία μεταλλευτική και μεταλλουργική τεχνική (Athens).Google Scholar

Ulrich, R. 2008. ‘Representations of Technical Processes’, in Oleson, J. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World (Oxford), 35–61.Google Scholar

Wee, J. Z. 2017. ‘Earthquake and Epilepsy: The Body Geologic in the Hippocratic Treatise On the Sacred Disease’, in Wee, J. Z., ed., The Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman Medicine (Leiden), 142–67.Google Scholar

Worthen, T. D. 1970. ‘Pneumatic Action in the Klepsydra and Empedocles’ Account of Breathing’, Isis, 61.4: 520–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

Chapter 7 - Aristotle on the Lung and the Bellows–Lungs Analogy

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive