Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-685pp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T16:15:18.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Parthenogenesis and parthenogenetic stem cells

from Section 4 - Imprinting and reprogramming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

By
Tiziana A.L. Brevini  and
Fulvio Gandolfi
Edited by
Alan Trounson ,
Roger Gosden  and
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Tiziana A.L. Brevini
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Centre for Stem Cell Research UNISTEM, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Fulvio Gandolfi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Centre for Stem Cell Research UNISTEM, Universit degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Alan Trounson
Affiliation:
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Roger Gosden
Affiliation:
Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Cornell University, New York
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Get access

Summary

Parthenogenesis

Parthenogenesis is the process by which an egg can develop without being fertilized by the sperm and is a form of reproduction common to a variety of lower organisms such as ants, flies, lizards, snakes, fish, amphibia, and honeybees that may occasionally reproduce in this manner.

Although mammals are not spontaneously capable of this form of reproduction, mammalian ova can successfully undergo artificial parthenogenesis in vitro. Mimicking the calcium wave induced by the sperm at fertilization, with the use of a calcium ionophore or other stimuli, the mature oocyte is activated and begins to divide. Mammalian parthenotes can develop into different stages after oocyte activation, depending on the species, but never to term.

Parthenogenetic activation can be induced at diferent stages along oocyte meiosis, resulting in parthenotes with diferent chromosome complements.

When parthenogenetic activation is performed in oocytes at the secondmetaphase it results in the extrusion of the second polar body and leads to the formation of a haploid parthenote. This method is rarely used since, in this case, the developmental competence is reduced compared to normal embryos and to diploid parthenotes.

Diploid parthenotes can be obtained in two different ways. The most common consists in combining the activation of metaphase II oocytes with exposure to an actin polymerization inhibitor, usually cytochalasin B. Alternatively, a diploid parthenote can be generated by preventing the extrusion of the first polar body. This protocol leads to the formation of tetraploid oocytes and the diploid status is then re-established at the end of oocytematuration with the extrusion of the second polar body.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biology and Pathology of the Oocyte
Role in Fertility, Medicine and Nuclear Reprograming
 , pp. 250 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Henery, CC, Kaufman, MH. Cleavage rate of haploid and diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos during the preimplantation period. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 31: 258–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balakier, H, Tarkowski, AK. Diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos produced by heat-shock and cytochalasin B. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1976; 35: 25–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Kubiak, J, Paldi, A, Weber, M, Maro, B. Genetically identical parthenogenetic mouse embryos produced by inhibition of the first meiotic cleavage with cytochalasin D. Development 1991; 111: 763–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Surani, MA. Reprogramming of genome function through epigenetic inheritance. Nature 2001; 414: 122–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, MH, Barton, SC, Surani, MA. Normal postimplantation development of mouse parthenogenetic embryos to the forelimb bud stage. Nature 1977; 265: 53–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brevini, TA, Pennarossa, G, Vanelli, A, Maffei, S, Gandolfi, F.Parthenogenesis in non-rodent species: developmental competence and differentiation plasticity. Theriogenology 2012; 77: 766–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman-Smith, ED, Werb, Z.Stem cell defects in parthenogenetic peri-implantation embryos. Development 1995; 121: 2069–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Stevens, LC, Varnum, DS, Eicher, EM.Viable chimaeras produced from normal and parthenogenetic mouse embryos. Nature 1977; 269: 515–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surani, MA, Barton, SC, Kaufman, MH. Development to term of chimaeras between diploid parthenogenetic and fertilised embryos. Nature 1977; 270: 601–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fundele, RH, Norris, ML, Barton, SC, et al. Temporal and spatial selection against parthenogenetic cells during development of fetal chimeras. Development 1990; 108: 203–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Nigg, EA, Stearns, T. The centrosome cycle: centriole biogenesis, duplication and inherent asymmetries. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13: 1154–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manandhar, G, Schatten, H, Sutovsky, P. Centrosome reduction during gametogenesis and its significance. Biol Reprod 2005; 72: 2–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schatten, H, Sun, Q-Y. New insights into the role of centrosomes in mammalian fertilization and implications for ART. Reproduction 2011; 142: 793–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schatten, G.The centrosome and its mode of inheritance: the reduction of the centrosome during gametogenesis and its restoration during fertilization. Dev Biol 1994; 165: 299–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calarco-Gillam, PD, Siebert, MC, Hubble, R, Mitchison, T, Kirschner, M.Centrosome development in early mouse embryos as defined by an autoantibody against pericentriolar material. Cell 1983; 35: 621–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sathananthan, AH, Ratnam, SS, Ng, SC, et al. The sperm centriole: its inheritance, replication and perpetuation in early human embryos. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 345–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sathananthan, AH, Lyons, G, Dharmawardena, V, et al. Centriolar dynamics in the bovine embryo: inheritance and perpetuation of the sperm centrosome during fertilization and development. Protoplasma 1999; 206: 263–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morita, J, Terada, Y, Hosoi, Y, et al. Microtubule organization during rabbit fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection with and without sperm centrosome. Reprod Med Biol 2005; 4: 169–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manandhar, G, Feng, D, Yi, YJ, et al. Centrosomal protein centrin is not detectable during early pre-implantation development but reappears during late blastocyst stage in porcine embryos. Reproduction 2006; 132: 423–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatten, H, Sun, QY. Centrosome dynamics during mammalian oocyte maturation with a focus on meiotic spindle formation. Mol Reprod Dev 2011; 78: 757–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szöllosi, D, Ozil, J-P. De novo formation of centrioles in parthenogenetically activated, diploidized rabbit embryos. Biol Cell 1991; 72: 61–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, M-R, Kim, N-H. Maternal gamma (γ)-tubulin is involved in microtubule reorganization during bovine fertilization and parthenogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 2003; 64: 438–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winger, QA, De La, Fuente R, King, WA, Armstrong, DT, Watson, AJ. Bovine parthenogenesis is characterized by abnormal chromosomal complements: implications for maternal and paternal co-dependence during early bovine development. Dev Genet 1997; 21: 160–6.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhak, J-S, Lee, S-L, Ock, S-A, et al. Developmental rate and ploidy of embryos produced by nuclear transfer with different activation treatments in cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 92: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van De Velde, A, Liu, L, Bols, PEJ, Ysebaert, M-T, Yang, X. Cell allocation and chromosomal complement of parthenogenetic and IVF bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1999; 54: 57–62.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, B, Coppola, G, Di Berardino, D, et al. The effect of 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) and cycloheximide (CHX) on the development and chromosomal complement of sheep parthenogenetic and nuclear transfer embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2006; 73: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somfai, T, Ozawa, M, Noguchi, J, et al. Diploid porcine parthenotes produced by inhibition of first polar body extrusion during in vitro maturation of follicular oocytes. Reproduction 2006; 132: 559–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, MH. The chromosome complement of single-pronuclear haploid mouse embryos following activation by ethanol treatment. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1982; 71: 139–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Henery, CC, Kaufman, MH. The incidence of aneuploidy after single pulse electroactivation of mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1993; 34: 299–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, F, Zakhartchenko, V, Stojkovic, M, et al. Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos. Curr Biol 2003; 13: 1116–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combelles, CM, Kearns, WG, Fox, JH, Racowsky, C. Cellular and genetic analysis of oocytes and embryos in a human case of spontaneous oocyte activation. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 545–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munne, S, Chen, S, Colls, P, et al. Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 628–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sathananthan, AH. Human centriole: origin, & how it impacts fertilization, embryogenesis, infertility & cloning. Indian J Med Res 2009; 129: 348–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Maller, J, Poccia, D, Nishioka, D, et al. Spindle formation and cleavage in Xenopus eggs injected with centriole-containing fractions from sperm. Exp Cell Res 1976; 99: 285–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palermo, G, Colombero, L, Rosenwaks, Z. The human sperm centrosome is responsible for normal syngamy and early embryonic development. Rev Reprod 1997; 2: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surti, U, Hoffner, L, Chakravarti, A, Ferrell, RE. Genetics and biology of human ovarian teratomas. I. Cytogenetic analysis and mechanism of origin. Am J Hum Genet 1990; 47: 635–43.Google Scholar
Sathananthan, AH, Selvaraj, K, Girijashankar, ML, et al. From oogonia to mature oocytes: inactivation of the maternal centrosome in humans. Microsc Res Tech 2006; 69: 396–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, MH, Robertson, EJ, Handyside, AH, Evans, MJ. Establishment of pluripotential cell lines from haploid mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1983; 73: 249–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Leeb, M, Wutz, A. Derivation of haploid embryonic stem cells from mouse embryos. Nature 2011; 479: 131–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, ND, Barton, SC, Hilton, K, Norris, ML, Surani, MA. A functional analysis of imprinting in parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells. Development 1994; 120: 1473–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Horii, T, Kimura, M, Morita, S, Nagao, Y, Hatada, I. Loss of genomic imprinting in mouse parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2008; 26: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C, Chen, Z, Liu, Z, et al. Correlation of expression and methylation of imprinted genes with pluripotency of parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18: 2177–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Z, Liu, Z, Huang, J, et al. Birth of parthenote mice directly from parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2009; 27: 2136–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, L, Kozlov, S, Piras, G, Stewart, CL. Paternal and maternal genomes confer opposite effects on proliferation, cell-cycle length, senescence, and tumor formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 13344–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, H, Lei, J, Wininger, D, et al. Multilineage potential of homozygous stem cells derived from metaphase II oocytes. Stem Cells 2003; 21: 152–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cibelli, JB, Grant, KA, Chapman, KB, et al. Parthenogenetic stem cells in nonhuman primates. Science 2002; 295: 819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paffoni, A, Brevini, TA, Somigliana, E, et al. In vitro development of human oocytes after parthenogenetic activation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 77–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brevini, T, Cillo, F, Tosetti, V, et al. Human pluripotent stem cells derived by parthenogenesis. Keystone Symposia on Stem Cells Whistler, BC 2006; 54 (abstract).Google Scholar
Kim, K, Lerou, P, Yabuuchi, A, et al. Histocompatible embryonic stem cells by parthenogenesis. Science 2007; 315: 482–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, G, OuYang, Q, Zhou, X, et al. A highly homozygous and parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line derived from a one-pronuclear oocyte following in vitro fertilization procedure. Cell Res 2007; 17: 999–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mai, Q, Yu, Y, Li, T, et al. Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines from parthenogenetic blastocysts. Cell Res 2007; 17: 1008–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revazova, ES, Turovets, NA, Kochetkova, OD, et al. Patient-specific stem cell lines derived from human parthenogenetic blastocysts. Cloning Stem Cells 2007; 9: 432–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brevini, TA, Gandolfi, F. Parthenotes as a source of embryonic stem cells. Cell Prolif 2008; 41 Suppl 1: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brevini, TA, Pennarossa, G, Antonini, S, et al. Cell lines derived from human parthenogenetic embryos can display aberrant centriole distribution and altered expression levels of mitotic spindle check-point transcripts. Stem Cell Rev 2009; 5: 340–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, Z, Zhu, W, Yu, Y, et al. Derivation and long-term culture of human parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells using human foreskin feeders. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27: 285–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, K, Ng, K, Rugg-Gunn, PJ, et al. Recombination signatures distinguish embryonic stem cells derived by parthenogenesis and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Stem Cell 2007; 1: 346–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dighe, V, Clepper, L, Pedersen, D, et al. Heterozygous embryonic stem cell lines derived from nonhuman primate parthenotes. Stem Cells 2008; 26: 756–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revazova, ES, Turovets, NA, Kochetkova, OD, et al. HLA homozygous stem cell lines derived from human parthenogenetic blastocysts. Cloning Stem Cells 2008; 10: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelzer, Y, Yanuka, O, Benvenisty, N. Global analysis of parental imprinting in human parthenogenetic induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18: 735–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turovets, N, D’Amour, KA, Agapov, V, et al. Human parthenogenetic stem cells produce enriched populations of definitive endoderm cells after trichostatin A pretreatment. Differentiation 2011; 81: 292–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turovets, N, Fair, J, West, R, et al. Derivation of high-purity definitive endoderm from human parthenogenetic stem cells using an in vitro analog of the primitive streak. Cell Transplant 2012; 21: 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Ai, A, Tang, ZY, et al. Mesenchymal-like stem cells derived from human parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2012; 21: 143–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaev, DA, Garitaonandia, I, Abramihina, TV, et al. In vitro differentiation of human parthenogenetic stem cells into neural lineages. Regen Med 2012; 7: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schatten, H, Sun, Q-Y. The significant role of centrosomes in stem cell division and differentiation. Microsc Microanal 2011; 17: 506–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatten, H, Hueser, CN, Chakrabarti, A. From fertilization to cancer: the role of centrosomes in the union and separation of genomic material. Microsc Res Tech 2000; 49: 420–7.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mizushima, N, Levine, B, Cuervo, AM, Klionsky, DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 2008; 451: 1069–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, E, Chen, RH. Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13: 1501–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, C, Filopei, J, Batac, J, Alford, L, Paluh, JL. An extended anaphase signaling pathway for Mad2p includes microtubule organizing center proteins and multiple motor-dependent transitions. Cell Cycle 2006; 5: 1456–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, KM, Hardwick, KG. The spindle checkpoint. J Cell Sci 2006; 119: 4139–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandori, C, Cowley, SM, James, LP, Eisenman, RN. The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2000; 16: 653–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morito, Y, Terada, Y, Nakamura, S, et al. Dynamics of microtubules and positioning of female pronucleus during bovine parthenogenesis. Biol Reprod 2005; 73: 935–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nigg, EA, Raff, JW. Centrioles, centrosomes, and cilia in health and disease. Cell 2009; 139: 663–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×