Book contents
- Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution
- Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Considerations
- 1 The Cross-Modal Lexical Priming Paradigm and Bilingual Exhaustive Access
- 2 Theory Visualizations for Bilingual Models of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution
- 3 Bilingual Lexical Access
- Part II Bilingual Lexical Processing
- Part III Bilingual Sentence Processing
- Part IV Neuroscience of Bilingual Lexical Access
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
1 - The Cross-Modal Lexical Priming Paradigm and Bilingual Exhaustive Access
from Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2019
Book contents
- Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution
- Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Considerations
- 1 The Cross-Modal Lexical Priming Paradigm and Bilingual Exhaustive Access
- 2 Theory Visualizations for Bilingual Models of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution
- 3 Bilingual Lexical Access
- Part II Bilingual Lexical Processing
- Part III Bilingual Sentence Processing
- Part IV Neuroscience of Bilingual Lexical Access
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
This chapter provides a critical review of the cross-modal lexical priming (CMLP) paradigm and its variants as used in the bilingual lexical access literature. We first discuss methodological concerns related to task processing demands and the specific requirements (e.g., ecological validity, online vs. offline) required to appropriately assess bilingual exhaustive activation. We then go on to discuss the functionality and reliability of the CMLP and its implementations in bilingual cross-language priming, bilingual figurative language processing (e.g., idioms and metaphors), and word type effects (e.g., homophones, homographs). We underscore the CMLP’s capability and flexibility to probe for bilingual multiple lexical activation at multiple points throughout the spoken sentence and provide early and late measures of language processing.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution , pp. 3 - 16Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Further Reading
Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2009). An overview of semantic processing in bilinguals: Methods and findings. In Pavlenko, A, The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 79–98). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Altarriba, J., & Gianico, J. (2003). Lexical ambiguity resolution across languages: A theoretical and empirical review. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 159–170.Google Scholar
Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.). (2016). Methods in bilingual reading comprehension. The Bilingual Mind and Brain Book Series, 1. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
References
Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice (rev. ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Beck, S. D., & Weber, A. (2016). Bilingual and monolingual idiom processing is cut from the same cloth: The role of the L1 in literal and figurative meaning activation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01350Google Scholar
Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 295–308.Google Scholar
Cieślicka, A. B. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 22, 115–144.Google Scholar
Cieślicka, A. B., & Heredia, R. R. (2016). Priming and online multiple language activation. In Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 123–156). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.Google Scholar
Davis, C., Sánchez-Casas, R., García-Albea, J. E., Guasch, M., Molero, M., & Ferré, P. (2010). Masked translation priming: Varying language experience and word type with Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990393Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1001–1018.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in a bilingual and a monolingual task: Support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 397–428.Google Scholar
Felser, C., & Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23(1), 9–36.Google Scholar
Fernández, E. M., & De Souza, R. A. (2016). Walking bilinguals across language boundaries: On-line and off-line techniques. In Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 33–60). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Anes, M. (1994). Why study spoken language? In Gernsnacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 33–56). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gerard, L. D., & Scarborough, D. L. (1989). Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 305–315.Google Scholar
Heredia, R. R., & Blumentritt, T. L. (2002). On-line processing of social stereotypes during spoken language comprehension. Experimental Psychology, 49, 208–221.Google Scholar
Heredia, R. R., & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.). (2015). Bilingual figurative language processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heredia, R.R., & Cieślicka, A. B. (2016). Metaphoric reference: An eye movement analysis of Spanish–English and English–Spanish bilingual readers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00439Google Scholar
Heredia, R. R., & Muñoz, M. E. (2015). Metaphoric reference: A real-time analysis. In Heredia, R. R. & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 89–116). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hernández, A. E., Bates, E., & Ávila, L. X. (1996). Processing across the language boundary: A cross-modal priming study of Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 846–864.Google Scholar
Hoversten, L. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). A time course analysis of interlingual homograph processing: Evidence from eye movements. Bilingualism, 19(2), 347–360.Google Scholar
Keatley, C. W., Spinks, J. A., & De Gelder, B. (1994). Asymmetrical cross-language priming effects. Memory and Cognition, 22(11), 70–84.Google Scholar
Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual non-selective lexical access in sentence contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 217–233.Google Scholar
Li, P., & Yip, M. C. (1998). Context effects and the processing of spoken homophones. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 223–243.Google Scholar
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 381–390.Google Scholar
Macizo, P., Bajo, T., & Martín, M. C. (2010). Inhibitory processes in bilingual language comprehension: Evidence from Spanish-English interlexical homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 232–244.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1965). “Intentional” and “incidental” learning in human subjects: The role of instructions to learn and motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 63(5), 359–376.Google Scholar
Mason, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
Morris, D. C., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.Google Scholar
Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 225–236.Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L. (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225–254.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 197–212.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. T., & Heredia, R. R. (2002). Comprehending spoken metaphoric reference: A real-time analysis. Experimental Psychology, 49, 34–44.Google Scholar
Swaab, T., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (2003). Understanding words in sentence contexts: The time course of ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language, 86, 326–343.Google Scholar
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D. A. (1982). The structure and time-course of information interaction during speech comprehension: Lexical segmentation, access, and interpretation. In Mehler, J., Walker, E. C. T., & Garrett, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on mental representation (pp. 151–167). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Swinney, D., Love, T., Walenski, M., & Smith, E. E. (2007). Conceptual combination during sentence comprehension: Evidence for compositional processes. Psychological Science, 18(5), 397–400.Google Scholar
Tabossi, P. (1996). Cross-modal semantic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 569–576.Google Scholar
van Hell, J. G., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2008). Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals, Acta Psychological, 128, 431–451.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., Pivneva, I., & Titone, D. (2016). Eye movement methods to investigate bilingual reading. In Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieślicka, A. B.(Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension (pp. 183–211). New York: Springer.Google Scholar