Book contents
- Beyond Fragmentation
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- Beyond Fragmentation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Beyond Fragmentation
- 2 The Procedural Cross-Fertilization Pull
- 3 Procedural Convergence in International Courts and Tribunals
- 4 New Media Evidence across International Courts and Tribunals
- 5 The Acquis Judiciaire, a Tool for Harmonization in a Decentralized System of Litigation?
- 6 Why Cite External Legal Sources?
- 7 Of Gardeners and Bees
- 8 A View from the Coal Face
- 9 Agents of Cross-Fertilization
- Index
7 - Of Gardeners and Bees
Theorizing the Actors of Cross-Fertilization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2022
- Beyond Fragmentation
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- Beyond Fragmentation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Beyond Fragmentation
- 2 The Procedural Cross-Fertilization Pull
- 3 Procedural Convergence in International Courts and Tribunals
- 4 New Media Evidence across International Courts and Tribunals
- 5 The Acquis Judiciaire, a Tool for Harmonization in a Decentralized System of Litigation?
- 6 Why Cite External Legal Sources?
- 7 Of Gardeners and Bees
- 8 A View from the Coal Face
- 9 Agents of Cross-Fertilization
- Index
Summary
This chapter offers a new framework for theorizing about the roles of different types of actors who participate in processes of cross-fertilization. All of these actors have complex or mixed motives: while actors may place some value on the coherence of the international legal system, they weigh such systemic concerns against other, more immediate concerns. International judges, for example, may place value on the coherence of the international legal system, but they may place greater emphasis on the autonomy of their own specialized or regional legal order, on the normative values of that order and on their own authority within that order. Other actors, by contrast, may place little or no value on international legal coherence, but favor or oppose cross-fertilization as a function of its effect on the their likelihood of prevailing in a dispute. In a world of complex actor preferences, the process of cross-fertilization is likely to resemble, not a consensual process of management, but a constant struggle among a wide variety of actors, some of whom will champion cross-fertilization while others seek to prevent or limit it.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Beyond FragmentationCross-Fertilization, Cooperation and Competition among International Courts and Tribunals, pp. 182 - 217Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022