Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:36:33.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Independence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Get access

Summary

Having argued for the legitimacy of assuming transitivity and normality, I now turn to the independence principle (defined in Section 1.3). Independence does not have the kind of popular endorsement that transitivity does. Nevertheless, I show that independence does follow from premises that are widely endorsed. The argument that I give differs at least subtly from those in the literature, and I explain why I regard my argument as superior. I also explain why arguments against independence strike me as uncompelling.

VIOLATIONS

In Chapter 2 we saw that most people endorse transitivity and normality. With independence, on the other hand, there is fairly strong prima facie evidence that many people reject it. Part of this evidence consists of decision problems in which a substantial proportion of people make choices that appear inconsistent with independence; there is also evidence that to many people the axiom itself does not seem compelling.

The Allais problems

Maurice Allais was one of the earliest critics of independence, and backed up his position by formulating decision problems in which many people have preferences that appear to violate independence. I will present these problems in the way Savage (1954, p. 103) formulated them, since this brings out the conflict with independence most clearly.

A ball is to be randomly drawn from an urn containing 100 balls, numbered from 1 to 100. There are two separate decision problems to consider, with options and outcomes as in Figure 3.1.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Independence
  • Patrick Maher
  • Book: Betting on Theories
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527326.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Independence
  • Patrick Maher
  • Book: Betting on Theories
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527326.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Independence
  • Patrick Maher
  • Book: Betting on Theories
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527326.004
Available formats
×