Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:14:24.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Against the philosophers: the refutation of materialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

P. J. E. Kail
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The previous chapter discussed Berkeley’s case for immaterialism. The basis for this idea is a claim about the essence of sensible qualities. A sensible quality is essentially a form of appearance, and so it exists only in relation to a mind. The physical objects that populate the world are just collections of these sensible qualities and so physical objects are mind-dependent.

Much of the Principles attempts to show how this central insight is consistent with what we ordinarily believe of the world and how we are to understand the practice of science in its light. However, Berkeley’s first move, after offering his case for immaterialism, is to dispose of materialism. His objections to materialism are the subject of the present chapter. He has a battery of different objections to different characterisations of material substance, treating it, as Kenneth Winkler aptly puts it, as ‘a moving target’. This is not a surprise. As we saw in Chapter 2 there are differing views on material substance, and so Berkeley considers a different version of the doctrine and possible responses to his objections.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gallois, André in his paper, ‘Berkeley’s Master Argument’, Philosophical Review 83 (1974), 55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret, ‘Did Berkeley Completely Misunderstand the Basis of the Primary–Secondary Quality Distinction in Locke?’, in Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (Princeton University Press, 1999), pp. 215–28Google Scholar
Campbell, John, ‘Berkeley’s Puzzle’, in Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility (Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 127–43Google Scholar
Stoneham, Tom, Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues (Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 134–9Google Scholar
Fogelin, Robert, Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge (London: Routledge, 2001), p. 63Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×