Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T11:34:09.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2019

Devin Henry
Devin Henry
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes
The Hylomorphic Theory of Substantial Generation
 , pp. 222 - 231
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, T. 2016. ‘Form vs. matter’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/form-matter/.Google Scholar
Algra, K. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 3: substantial change and the problem of not-being’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J., Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 91–121. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, A. 2013. ‘Aristotle’s Parmenidean dilemma’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95(3): 245–74.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1982. ‘Aristotle on inefficient causes’, The Philosophical Quarterly 32 (129): 311–26.Google Scholar
Balme, D. [1972](1992). Aristotle: De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I (with passages from II.1–13). Translated with notes, with a report on recent work and additional bibliography by A. Gotthelf. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Balme, D. 1987. ‘Aristotle’s biology was not essentialist’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 291–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. 1962. ‘GENOS and EIDOS in Aristotle’s biology’, The Classical Quarterly, New Series 12(1): 81–98.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 2000. Aristotle: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1982. Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodnar, I. 2012. ‘Aristotle’s natural philosophy’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/aristotle-natphil/.Google Scholar
Bodnar, I. 2005. ‘Teleology across nature’, Rhizai 2: 9–29.Google Scholar
Bodnar, I. 1997. ‘Movers and elemental motion in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15: 81–117.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s natural teleology in Physics II’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 121–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2010. ‘Biology and metaphysics in Aristotle’, in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, pp. 30–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. 1987. ‘Definition and scientific method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 120–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bostock, D. 2006. Space, Time, Matter, and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostock, D. 1994. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Z and H. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 4: distinguishing alteration’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 123–50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Broadie [Waterlow], S. 1982. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brown, L. 1994. ‘The verb “to be” in Greek philosophy’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Language (Companions to Ancient Thought 3), pp. 212–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, L. 1986. ‘Being in the Sophist: a syntactic inquiry’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 49–70. Reprinted in G. Fine (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, 1999, pp. 455–78, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 1: a false start?’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 25–63. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2004. ‘Aristotle on the foundations of sublunary physics’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 7–24. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carraro, N. 2017. ‘Aristotle’s embryology and Ackrill’s Problem’, Phronesis 62(3): 274–304.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2018. ‘Physics I 7’, in Quarantotto, D. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics Book I: A Systematic Exploration, pp. 178–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2010. Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2004. ‘Simple genesis and prime matter’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 151–69. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2001. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1991. ‘Teleological causation in the Physics’, in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, pp. 101–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1988. ‘Aristotle on hypothetical necessity and irreducibility’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69: 1–53.Google Scholar
Charlton, W. 1970. Aristotle’s Physics Books 1 & 2. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Code, A. 2003. ‘Changes, powers and potentialities in Aristotle’, in Reshotko, N. (ed.), Desire, Identity and Existence: Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner, pp. 251–71. Kelowna: Academic Printing & Publishing.Google Scholar
Code, A. 1995. ‘Potentiality in Aristotle’s Science and Metaphysics’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76(3/4): 405–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, A. 1987. ‘Soul as efficient cause in Aristotle’s embryology’. Philosophical Topics 15 (2): 51–9.Google Scholar
Code, A. 1976. ‘The persistence of Aristotelian matter’, Philosophical Studies 29(6): 357–67.Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, S. 2001. ‘An integrated approach to Aristotle as a biological philosopher’, Review of Metaphysics 55(2): 297–322.Google Scholar
Cook, K. 1996. ‘Sexual inequality in Aristotle’s theories of reproduction and inheritance’ in Ward, Julie K. (ed.), Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, pp. 51–67. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1988. ‘Metaphysics in Aristotle’s embryology’, Cambridge Philological Society Proceedings, 214 (new series 34): 14–41.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1987. ‘Hypothetical necessity and natural teleology’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 243–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1982. ‘Aristotle on natural teleology’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos, pp. 197–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Gregoric, P.. 2010. ‘Separability vs. difference: parts and capacities of the soul in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 81–120.Google Scholar
Curd, P. 2011. A Presocratics Reader: Selected Fragments and Testimonia. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
De Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J., eds. 2004. Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. In press. ‘The matter for birth, life, and the elements’, in Taub, L. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Ancient Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. 2018. ‘The definition of matter in Physics I’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. 2007. ‘Aristotle’s motivation for matter’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. (ed.) 2015. Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M. 2015. ‘Eulogos in natural scientific inquiry’, in Ebrey, D., Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy, pp. 217–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fankhauser, D. 2017. ‘Rennet for making cheese’, www.biology.clc.uc.edu/fankhauser/Cheese/Rennet/Rennet.html.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. 1989. ‘Plato and Aristotle on negative predication’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 71(3): 257–82.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 10: on mixtures and mixables’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J., Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 289–314. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1994. ‘Aristotle’s notion of potentiality in Metaphysics’, in Scaltas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M.-L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, pp. 173–94. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. 1987. ‘Aristotle on bodies, matter, and potentiality’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 392–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, G. 1999. Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, C. 2015. ‘From blood to flesh: homonymy, unity, and ways of being in Aristotle’, Ancient Philosophy 35(2): 375–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, C. 2007. ‘Organic unity and the matter of man’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 167–204.Google Scholar
Furth, M. 1988. Substance, Form, and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2010. ‘Form and inheritance in Aristotle’s embryology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 183–212.Google Scholar
Gill, M-L. 2016. ‘Aristotle’s hylomorphism in Metaphysics Theta’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Gill, M-L. 2014. ‘The limits of teleology in Aristotle’s Meteorology IV.12’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4: 335–50.Google Scholar
Gill, M-L. 2012. Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, M-L. 1989. Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds. 1987. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2018. ‘Aristotle on animals’, in Adamson, P. and Edwards, G. F. (eds.), Animals: A History, pp. 9–26. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2017. ‘Aristotle on epigenesis’, in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide, pp. 89–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2015a. ‘Substantial generation in Physics I.5–7’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 144–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2015b. ‘The cosmological significance of animal generation’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, pp. 100–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2014. ‘The birds and the bees: Aristotle on the biological concept of analogy’, in Gurtler, G. M. SJ and Wians, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 145–69. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2013. ‘Optimality reasoning in Aristotle’s natural teleology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45: 225–63.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2011. ‘Review of Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 11 May, http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/explanation-and-teleology-in-aristotle-s-science-of-nature/.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2009. ‘Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle, pp. 368–83. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2008. ‘Organismal natures’, in Mouracade, J. (ed.), Aristotle on Life. Special issue of Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 41(3): 47–74.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2007a. ‘How sexist is Aristotle’s developmental biology?’, Phronesis 52(3): 251–69.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2007b. ‘Review of Monte Ransome Johnson Aristotle on Teleology’, Ancient Philosophy 27(1): 191–200.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2006a. ‘Aristotle on the mechanisms of inheritance’, Journal of the History of Biology 39: 425–55.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2006b. ‘Understanding Aristotle’s reproductive hylomorphism’, Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 39(3): 257–88.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2005. ‘Embryological models in ancient philosophy’, Phronesis 50(1): 1–42.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. 2010. ‘The sense and reference of Kalon in Aristotle’, Classical Philology 105(4): 381–96.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. 1951. Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. 1926. Aristotle on Coming-to-Be and Passing-Away. Revised text with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2015. ‘The two kinds of ends in Aristotle: the view from de Anima’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, pp. 119–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus–Critias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s architectonic sciences’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, pp. 163–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 2005. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, B. 1974. ‘Aristotle’s Introduction of Matter’, The Philosophical Review 83(4): 474–500.Google Scholar
Judson, L. 2005. ‘Aristotelian teleology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 341–66.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 2009. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1981. ‘Some philosophical uses of “to be” in Plato’, Phronesis 26(2): 105–34.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1986. ‘Retrospective on the verb “to be” and the concept of being’, in Knuuttila, S. and Hintikka, J. (eds.), The Logic of Being, pp. 1–28. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Katz, E. 2017. ‘Commentary on GC II 9’, paper presented at the Notre Dame Centre for Aristotelian Studies Workshop, University of Notre Dame, 13 May 2017.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2015. ‘Aristotle on interpreting nature’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 31–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2010. ‘Hylomorphism in Aristotle’s Physics’, Ancient Philosophy 30(1): 107–24.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2008. ‘The place of I 7 in the argument of Physics I’, Phronesis 53(2): 180–208.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2006. ‘Aristotle Physics I 8’, Phronesis 51(4): 330–61.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2003. ‘Aristotle’s definition of nature’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 59–87.Google Scholar
Kono, T., Obata, Y., Wu, Q., Niwa, K., Ono, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Park, E. S., Seo, J. S., and Ogawa, H. 2004. ‘Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood’, Nature 428(6985): 860–4.Google Scholar
Kosman, L. A. 2010. ‘Male and female in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, in Lennox, James G. and Bolton, Robert (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, pp. 147–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krizan, M. 2013. ‘Substantial change and the limiting case of Aristotelian matter’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 30(4): 293–310.Google Scholar
Kullman, W. (1985). ‘Different concepts of the final cause in Aristotle’, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday, pp. 170–5. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. 2010. ‘Aristotle on causation and conditional necessity: An. Post. 2.12 in context’, in de Haas, F., Leunissen, M., and Martijn, M. (eds.), Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond, pp. 203–34. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lane, M. S. 1998. Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lang, H. 1998. The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lear, J. 1988. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, D. 2019. ‘Looking for the formative power in Aristotle’s nutritive soul’, in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2018. ‘“Most natural among the functions of living things”: reproduction as a nutritive function’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2010. ‘Bios and explanatory unity in Aristotle’s biology’, in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, pp. 329–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2008. ‘“As if we were investigating snubness”: Aristotle on the prospects for a single science of nature’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 149–86.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2004a. ‘Aristotle on the emergence of material complexity: Meteorologica IV and Aristotle’s biology’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4(2): 272–305.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2004b. ‘The place of zoology in Aristotle’s natural philosophy’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, pp. 58–70. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001a. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001b. ‘Aristotle on the unity and disunity of science’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15(2): 133–44.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001c. Aristotle on the Parts of Animals I-IV. Translation with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1999. ‘Teleology’, in Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A. (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, pp. 324–23. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1994. ‘Putting philosophy of science to the test: the case of Aristotle’s biology’, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 239–47.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1985. ‘Are Aristotelian Species Eternal?’, in Gotthelf, Allan (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, pp. 67–94. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1982. ‘Teleology, chance, and Aristotle’s theory of spontaneous generation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 20(3): 219–38.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2012a. ‘Crafting natures: Aristotle on animal design’, in Dicker, G. (ed.), The Annual Proceedings of the Center for Philosophic Exchange, pp. 28–51. Brockport: SUNY.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2012b. ‘Aristotle on natural character and its implications for moral development’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(4): 507–30.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. and Gotthelf, A.. 2010. ‘What’s teleology got to do with it? A reinterpretation of Generation of Animals V’, Phronesis 55(4): 325–56.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. 2014. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Meteorology 4. Translation with introduction by E. Lewis. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. 1994. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Meteorology 4. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. ‘Empirical research in Aristotle’s biology’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 53–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loux, M. J. 1992. ‘Aristotle and Parmenides: an interpretation of Physics A8’, in Cleary, J. and Wians, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 281–319. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Mason, A. 2006. ‘Plato on necessity and chaos’, Philosophical Studies 127(2): 283–98.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. 1982. ‘Accidental unities’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy, pp. 223–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2004. The Female in Aristotle’s Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 2002. ‘Aristotle’s definition of soul and the programme of the De Anima’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 83–139.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. Suavé 1992. ‘Aristotle, teleology, and reduction’, Philosophical Review 101(4): 791–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, R. 1982. ‘The world-soul in the Platonic cosmology’, Illinois Classical Studies 7(1): 41–8.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. R. 1950. ‘Necessity and persuasion in Plato’s Timaeus’, Philosophical Review 59(2): 147–63.Google Scholar
Notomi, N. 1999. The Unity of Plato’s Sophist: Between the Sophist and the Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1999. ‘Plato on not-being’, in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, pp. 416–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Originally published in Vlastos, G. (ed.) 1970, Plato, i: Metaphysics and Epistemology, New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. 2008. ‘Parmenides’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Feb. 2008) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/parmenides/.Google Scholar
Peck, A. L. 1942. Aristotle: Generation of Animals. Translation with notes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 1986. Aristotle’s Classification of Animals: Biology and the Conceptual Unity of the Aristotelian Corpus. Translated into English by A. Preus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. 1985. ‘Aristotle: zoology without species’, translated into English by A. Preus, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, pp. 95–116. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.Google Scholar
Quarantotto, D. 2015. ‘A dynamic ontology: on how Aristotle arrived at the conclusion that eternal change accomplishes ousia’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 162–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. M. 1974. ‘Prime matter in Aristotle’, Phronesis 19(2): 168–88.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jacob. 2015. ‘Physics V–VI versus VIII: unity of change and disunity in the Physics’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 206–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1953. Aristotle: Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle: Physics. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scharle, M. 2015. ‘“And these things follow”: teleology, necessity, and explanation in Aristotle’s Meteorologica’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy, pp. 79–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scharle, M. 2008. ‘Elemental teleology in Aristotle’s Physics 2.8’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 147–83.Google Scholar
Schut, E., Hemmings, N., and Brickhead, T. R.. 2008. ‘Parthenogenesis in a passerine bird, the Zebra Finch Taeniopygia guttata’, Ibis 150(1): 197–9.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2010. ‘Teleology: Aristotelian and Platonic’, in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, pp. 5–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 2’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 65–89. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1991. ‘Is Aristotle’s teleology anthropocentric?’, Phronesis 36(2): 179–96.Google Scholar
Segev, M. 2015. ‘Review of Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, by David Ebrey’, Notre Dame Philosophical Review 2 November, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/theory-and-practice-in-aristotle-s-natural-science.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2016. Aristotle: De anima. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2007. ‘Substance and life in Aristotle’, in Mouracade, J. (ed.), Aristotle on Life. Special issue of Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 41(3): 129–52.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1980. Necessity, Cause, and Blame. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Stavrianeas, S. 2015. ‘Nature as a principle of change’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics. A Critical Guide, pp. 46–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strange, S. 1999. ‘The double explanation in Plato’s Timaeus’, in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 1. Metaphysics and Epistemology, pp. 397–415. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tredennick, H. 1933. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Translated with introduction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tress, D. McGowan 1999. ‘Aristotle against the Hippocratics on sexual generation: a reply to Coles’, Phronesis 44(3): 228–41.Google Scholar
Tress, D. McGowan 1992. ‘The metaphysical science of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals and its feminist critics’, The Review of Metaphysics 46(2): 307–41.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1969. ‘Reasons and causes in the Phaedo’, Philosophical Review 78(3): 291–325.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. 1993. ‘Aristotelian rainfall and the lore of averages’, Phronesis 38(1): 18–30.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 2002. ‘Locomotive soul: the parts of soul in Aristotle’s scientific works’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 141–200.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 1990. ‘Aristotle on form and generation’, in Cleary, J. and Shartin, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 35–63. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1999. Philoponus: Aristotle on Coming-to-Be and Perishing. Translated with an introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1982. Aristotle’s De Generatione et Corruptione. Translated with notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2015. ‘In defense of the craft analogy: artifacts and natural teleology’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 107–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2003. Ways of Being: Potentiality and Actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, C. 1998. ‘Form, normativity, and gender in Aristotle: a feminist perspective’, in Freeland, C. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle, pp. 118–37. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1994. ‘The priority of actuality’, in Scaltas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M-L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, pp. 215–28. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1989. Substance and Essence in Aristotle. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1985. ‘Form, reproduction, and inherited characteristics in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, Phronesis 30(1): 46–57.Google Scholar
Yu, J. 2003. The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Vol. 52, The New Synthesis Historical Library. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Devin Henry, University of Western Ontario
  • Book: Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes
  • Online publication: 14 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108646680.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Devin Henry, University of Western Ontario
  • Book: Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes
  • Online publication: 14 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108646680.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Devin Henry, University of Western Ontario
  • Book: Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes
  • Online publication: 14 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108646680.012
Available formats
×