The age of Akbar

Catherine B. Asher

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521267281.004

3 - The age of Akbar

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Catherine B. Asher

Show author details

Catherine B. Asher: Affiliation:
University of Minnesota

Book contents

Get access

Summary

MUGHAL THEORIES OF KINGSHIP AND STATE POLITY

Akbar is generally recognized as the greatest and most capable of the Mughal rulers. Under him Mughal polity and statecraft reached maturity; and under his guidance the Mughals changed from a petty power to a major dynastic state. From his time to the end of the Mughal period, artistic production on both an imperial and sub-imperial level was closely linked to notions of state polity, religion and kingship.

Humayun died in 1556, only one year after his return to Hindustan. Upon hearing the call to prayers, he slipped on the steep stone steps of the library in his Din-Panah citadel in Delhi. Humayun's only surviving son and heir-apparent, Akbar, then just fourteen years of age, ascended the throne and ruled until 1605 the expanding Mughal empire. Until about 1561, Akbar was under the control of powerful court factions, first his guardian, Bhairam Khan, and then the scheming Maham Anga, a former imperial wet-nurse. Between about 1560 and 1580, Akbar devoted his energies to the conquest and then the consolidation of territory in north India. This he achieved through battle, marriage, treaty and, most significantly, administrative reform. Concurrent with these activities, Akbar developed an interest in religion that, while initially a personal concern, ultimately transformed his concept of state. Many of the policies he adopted, such as the renunciation of the poll-tax (jiziya) for non-Muslims, had a solid political basis as well as a personal one, for Akbar, much more than his Mughal predecessors, saw every advantage in maintaining good relations with the Hindu majority.

Type: Chapter
Information: Architecture of Mughal India , pp. 39 - 98

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521267281.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmad, Qeyamuddin, Corpus of Arabic and Persian Inscriptions of Bihar (Patna, 1973).

Ahmed, Shamsud-Din, Inscriptions of Bengal, IV (Rajshahi, 1960).

al-Badayuni, , Muntakhab al-Tawarikh, 3 vols. tr. Ranking, G. S. A., Lowe, W. H. and Haig, W. (reprinted., Patna, 1973), II.

Asher, Catherine B., “Sub-Imperial Patronage: The Architecture of Raja Man Singh,” in Miller, Barbara S. (ed.), Powers of Art: Patronage in Indian Culture (New Delhi, 1992).Google Scholar

Begley, W. E., “Mirak, Mirza Ghiyas,” Macmillan Encyclopedia of Architects (New York, 1982), II.Google Scholar

Bhakkari, Farid, Dhakhirat al-Khawanin, 3 vols. (Karachi, 1961–74), 1.

Brand, Michael and Lowry, Glenn D. (eds.), Fatehpur-Sikri: A Sourcebook (Cambridge, 1985).

Fuhrer, A., The Sharqi Architecture of Jaunpur, Archaeological Survey of India, New Imperial Series, Vol. XI (reprint ed.; Varanasi, 1970).

Hoag, John, Islamic Architecture (New York, 1977).

Jahangir, Muhammad Nur al-Din, Tuzuk-i Jahangiri, 2 vols., tr. Rogers, A. (reprint ed., Delhi, 1968), 1.

Khan, Iqtidar Alam, “The Nobility under Akbar and the Development of his Religious Policy, 1560–80,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1–2, 1968.Google Scholar

Khan, Samsam al-Daula Shah Nawaz and al-Hayy, 'Abd, Maasir al-Umara, 2 vols., tr. Beveridge, H. (reprint ed., Patna, 1979), 1.

Koch, Ebba, “Influence of Mughal Architecture,” in Michell, George (ed.), Ahmadabad (Bombay, 1988).Google Scholar

Koch, Ebba, “The Architectural Forms,” in Brand, Michael and Lowry, Glenn D. (eds.), Fatehpur-Sikri (Bombay, 1987).Google Scholar

Lowry, Glenn D., “Urban Structures and Functions,” in Brand, Michael and Lowry, Glenn D. (eds.), Fatehpur-Sikri (Bombay, 1987).Google Scholar

Lowry, Glenn, “Humayun's Tomb: Form, Function and Meaning in Early Mughal Architecture,” Muqarnas, 4, 1987.Google Scholar

Monserrate, Anthony, The Commentary of Father Monserrate, S.J., tr. Hoyland, J. S. (London, 1922).

Petruccioli, Attilio, “The Geometry of Power: The City's Planning,” in Brand, Michael and Lowry, Glenn D. (eds.), Fatehpur-Sikri (Bombay, 1987).Google Scholar

Richards, J. F., “The Formulation of Imperial Authority under Akbar and Jahangir,” in Richards, J. F. (ed.), Kingship and Authority in South Asia (Madison, 1978).Google Scholar

Richards, John F., “The Imperial Capital,” in Brand, Michael and Lowry, Glenn D. (eds.), Fatehpur-Sikri (Bombay, 1987).Google Scholar

Rizvi, S. A. A. and Flynn, John Vincent, Fathpnr Sikri (Bombay, 1975).

Sen, Geeti, Paintings from the Akbar Nama (Calcutta, 1984).

Skelton, Robert, “The Nicmat Nama: A Landmark in Malwa Painting,” Marg, XII, 1959.Google Scholar

Yazdani, G., “Narnaul and its Buildings,” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, III, 1907.Google Scholar