Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:21:36.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2020

Daniel W. Houck
Daniel W. Houck
Affiliation:
John Leland Center for Theological Studies
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Aquinas, Original Sin, and the Challenge of Evolution , pp. 258 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Abelard, Peter. Commentaria in epistolam Pauli ad Romanos. Ed. Buytaert, Eligius (CCCM 11). Turnhout, 1969.Google Scholar
Anselm of Canterbury. Cur deus homo. Opera Omnia, vol. 2. Ed. Schmitt, Franciscus Salesius. Rome, 1940.Google Scholar
Anselm of Canterbury. De conceptu virginali et de originali peccato. Opera Omnia, vol. 2. Ed. Schmitt, Franciscus Salesius. Rome, 1940.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Compendium theologiae: S. Thomae Aquinatis doctoris angelici Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII, vol. 42, cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. Rome, 1979.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de anima: S. Thomae Aquinatis doctoris angelici Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII, vol. 45, cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. Rome, 1996. [De anima]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de malo: S. Thomae Aquinatis doctoris angelici Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII, vol. 23, cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. Rome, 1982. [De malo]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de veritate: S. Thomae Aquinatis doctoris angelici Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII, vol. 22, 3/1: qq. 21–29, cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. Rome, 1973. [De veritate]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super Libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi episcopi Parisiensis, vol. 2. Ed. Mandonnet, Pierre. Paris, 1929. [Scriptum]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae: S. Thomae Aquinatis doctoris angelici Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII, vols. 4–12, cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. Rome, 1888–1906. [STh]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Super Epistolas S. Pauli Lectura. Turin: Marietti, 1953.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo. De civitate Dei libri XXII. Ed. Dombart, B. and Kalb, A. (CCL 47–8). Turnhout, 1955.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Thomas de Vio. Commentaria in Summa theologiae. S. Thomae Aquinatis doctoris angelici Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII, vol. 7, cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. Rome, 1892.Google Scholar
,. De infantibus praemature abreptis; Gregorii Nysseni ΓΡΗΓΟΡΙΟΥ ΕΠΙΣΚΟΠΟΥ ΝΥΣΣΗΣ ΠΡΟΣ ΙΕΠΙΟΝ ΠΕΡΙ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟ ΩΠΑΣ ΑΝΑΡΠΑΖΟΜΕΝΩΝ ΝΗΠΙΩΝ. Opera Dogmatica Minora, vol 3. Ed. Horner, Hadwiga. Leiden, 1987.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Sententiae in IV libris distinctae, 2 vols. Ed. Brady, Ignatius (SpicBon 4/5). Grottaferrata, 1971/81.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Alexander, Denis. Creation or Evolution? Do We Have to Choose? Oxford: Monarch Books, 2014.Google Scholar
Alexander, Denis. Genes, Determinism, God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Altaner, Berthold. Patrologie. Freiburg: Herder, 1958.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gary A. “Necessarium Adae Peccatum: The Problem of Original Sin.” In Sin, Death, and the Devil, ed. Braaten, Carl E. and Jenson, Robert W., 22–44. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Augustine, . The City of God against the Pagans. Trans. Dyson, R. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Augustine, . The Works of Saint Augustine: A New Translation for the 21st Century. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio. “A Theological Fittingness Argument for the Historicity of the Fall of Homo sapiens.” Nova et Vetera 13 (2015): 651–67.Google Scholar
Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio, Brent, James, Davenport, Thomas, and Ku, John Baptist, eds. Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith. Providence, RI: Cluny Media, 2016.Google Scholar
Ayala, Francisco J., and Cela-Conde, Camilo J.. Processes in Human Evolution: The Journey from Early Hominins to Neanderthals and Modern Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Babcock, William S. “Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1988): 28–55.Google Scholar
Backus, Irena, and Goudriaan, Aza. ‘“Semipelagianism’: The Origins of the Term and Its Passage into the History of Heresy.” The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 65.1 (2014): 25–46.Google Scholar
Bagby, Stephen. Sin in Origen’s Commentary on Romans. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2018.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics. Ed. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F.. Trans. Bromiley, G. W.. London: T&T Clark; New York: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
Bartmann, Bernhard. Lehrbuch der Dogmatik, vol. 1. Freiburg: Herder, 1932.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier Franco. The Transmission of Sin: Augustine and the Pre-Augustinian Sources. Trans. Kamesar, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Beiting, Christopher. “The Idea of Limbo in Thomas Aquinas.” The Thomist 62 (1998): 217–44.Google Scholar
Berry, R. J., and Noble, T. A., eds. Darwin, Creation and the Fall: Theological Challenges. Nottingham: Apollos, 2009.Google Scholar
Billings, J. Todd. Calvin, Participation, and the Gift: The Activity of Believers in Union with Christ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Blankenhorn, Bernhard. “The Instrumental Causality of the Sacraments: Thomas Aquinas and Louis-Marie Chauvet.” Nova et Vetera, English edition, 4.2 (2006): 255–94.Google Scholar
Blocher, Henri. Original Sin: Illuminating the Riddle. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997.Google Scholar
Bonino, Serge-Thomas. “La théorie des limbes et le mystère du surnaturel chez saint Thomas d’Aquin.” Revue Thomiste 101 (2001): 131–66.Google Scholar
Bonner, Gerald. St. Augustine of Hippo: Life and Controversies. Norwich: Canterbury Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bonnette, Dennis. Origin of the Human Species, 3rd ed. Ave Maria, FL: Sapientia Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Bouillard, Henri. Conversion et grâce chez s. Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Aubier, 1944.Google Scholar
Bowlin, John. “Nature’s Grace: Aquinas and Wittgenstein on Natural Law and Moral Knowledge.” In Grammar and Grace: Reformulations of Aquinas and Wittgenstein, ed. Stout, Jeffrey and MacSwain, Robert, 154–74. London: SCM, 2004.Google Scholar
Boyce, James. Born Bad: Original Sin and the Making of the Western World. Berkeley: Counterpoint, 2015.Google Scholar
Bradley, Denis J. M. Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Science. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Brand, Miryam. Evil within and Without: The Source of Sin and Its Nature as Portrayed in Second Temple Literature. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013.Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey E. “Anselm on Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Anselm, ed. Davies, Brian and Leftow, Brian, 222–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. “Pelagius and His Supporters: Aims and Environment.” Journal of Theological Studies, New Series, 19.1 (1968): 93–114.Google Scholar
Burggren, Warren. “Epigenetic Inheritance and Its Role in Evolutionary Biology: Re-evaluation and New Perspectives.” Biology 5.24 (2016): 1–22.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Richard. The Spirit of System: Lamarck and Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995 [1977].Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Commentaries on the Last Four Books of Moses, Arranged in the Form of a Harmony. Vol. 1. Trans. Bingham, Charles. Grand Rapids, MI: CCEL, 1852.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutionis Christianae Religionis. Ed. Tholuck, F. G.. Berolini, 1834.Google Scholar
Cann, Rebecca L., Stoneking, Mark, and Wilson, Allan C.. “Mitochondrial DNA and Human Evolution.” Nature 325 (1987): 31–6.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, William T., and Smith, James K. A., eds. Evolution and the Fall. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017.Google Scholar
Clarke, Norris. “Person, Being, and St. Thomas.” Communio 19 (1992): 601–18.Google Scholar
Coffey, David. “The Whole Rahner on the Supernatural Existential.” Theological Studies 65 (2004): 95–118.Google Scholar
Collins, R. “Evolution and Original Sin.” In Perspectives on an Evolving Creation, ed. Miller, K. B., 469–501. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L. Peter Lombard. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Cortez, Marc. “What Does It Mean to Call Karl Barth a ‘Christocentric Theologian’?” Scottish Journal of Theology 60.2 (2007): 1–17.Google Scholar
Couenhoven, Jesse. “Karl Barth’s Conception(s) of Human and Divine Freedom(s).” In Commanding Grace: Studies in Karl Barth’s Ethics, ed. Migliore, Daniel L., 239–55. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Couenhoven, Jesse. “St. Augustine’s Doctrine of Original Sin.” Augustinian Studies 36.2 (2005): 359–96.Google Scholar
Couenhoven, Jesse. Stricken by Sin, Cured by Christ: Agency, Necessity, and Culpability in Augustinian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Courtneay, William J. “The Dialectic of Omnipotence in the High and Late Middle Ages.” In Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy: Islamic, Jewish, and Christian Perspectives, ed. Rudavsky, Tamar, 243–69. Boston: D. Reidel, 1995.Google Scholar
Cranfield, C. E. B. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, vol. 1. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1975.Google Scholar
Cress, Donald A. “Augustine’s Privation Account of Evil.” Augustinian Studies 20 (1989): 105–23.Google Scholar
Crisp, Oliver D. An American Augustinian: Sin and Salvation in the Dogmatic Theology of William G. T. Shedd. Milton Keynes: Paternoster, 2007.Google Scholar
Crisp, Oliver D. Jonathan Edwards and the Metaphysics of Sin. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Crisp, Oliver D. “On Original Sin.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 17.3 (2015): 252–66.Google Scholar
Croasmun, Matthew. The Emergence of Sin: The Cosmic Tyrant in Romans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. Duns Scotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. Origen: The Life and Times of the First Great Theologian. Trans. Worrall, A. S.. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Conor. Darwin’s Pious Idea: Why the Ultra-Darwinists and Creationists Both Get It Wrong. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Wieslaw. “La dottrina sul peccato originale nei commenti di san Thommaso d’Aquino alle lettere di san Paolo Apostolo.” Angelicum 83 (2006): 557–629.Google Scholar
Davies, Brian. “Introduction” to On Evil. Translation of Thomas Aquinas’s De malo by Richard Regan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Davies, Brian. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Contra Gentiles: A Guide and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Davis, William A. Jr. “The Rape of Tess: Hardy, English Law, and the Case for Sexual Assault.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 52.2 (1997): 221–31.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 [1976].Google Scholar
De Boer, Martinus C. The Defeat of Death: Apocalyptic Eschatology in 1 Corinthians 15 and Romans 5. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
De Letter, P. “Original Sin, Privation of Original Justice.” The Thomist 17 (1954): 469–509.Google Scholar
De Lubac, Henri. Augustinisme et théologie moderne. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 2008.Google Scholar
Decosimo, David. Ethics as a Work of Charity: Thomas Aquinas and Pagan Virtue. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Denlinger, Adam C. Omnes in Adam ex pacto Dei: Ambrogio Catarino’s Doctrine of Covenantal Solidarity and Its Influence on Post-Reformation Reformed Theologians. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Roprecht, 2011.Google Scholar
Denzinger, Heinrich. Enchiridion Symbolorum: A Compendium of Creeds, Definitions, and Declarations of the Catholic Church, 43rd ed. Ed. Hünnerman, Peter. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence. “Natural Law and the First Act of Freedom: Maritain Revisited.” In Wisdom, Law, and Virtue: Essays in Thomistic Ethics, 221–42. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Di Noia, J. A. “Not ‘Born Bad’: The Catholic Truth about Original Sin in a Thomistic Perspective.” The Thomist 81.3 (2017): 345–59.Google Scholar
DiCenso, James J. Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dole, Andrew. Schleiermacher on Religion and the Natural Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Domning, Daryl P., and Hellwig, Monika K.. Original Selfishness: Original Sin and Evil in Light of Evolution. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Dorrien, Gary. The Making of American Liberal Theology: Imagining Progressive Religion, 1805–1900. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Downing, Andrew. “Sin and Its Relevance to Human Nature in the Summa Theologiae.” The Heythrop Journal 50 (2009): 793–805.Google Scholar
Drecoll, Volker Henning. Die Entstehung der Gnadenlehre Augustins. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar
Dubarle, André-Marie. Le Péché originel. Écriture et tradition. Paris: Cerf, 1999.Google Scholar
Dubarle, André-Marie. “La Pluralité des péchés héréditaires dans la tradition augustinienne.” Revue des etudes augustiniennes 2 (1957): 113–36.Google Scholar
Duffy, Stephen J. “Our Hearts of Darkness: Original Sin Revisited.” Theological Studies 49 (1988): 597–622.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. Romans 1–8. Dallas: Word Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Dupont, Anthony. “Original Sin in Tertullian and Cyprian: Conceptual Presence and Pre-Augustinian Content?” Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques 63 (2017): 1–29.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc, “Species.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/species/.Google Scholar
Espenberger, Johanes. Elemente der Erbsünde nach Augustin und der Frühscholastik. Mainz: Verlag von Kirchheim, 1905.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R. Augustine on Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Feingold, Lawrence. The Natural Desire to See God According to St. Thomas and His Interpreters. Naples, FL: Sapientia Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Firestone, Chris L., and Jacobs, Nathan. In Defense of Kant’s Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. Romans: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: Doubleday, 1993.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Edmund J. The Sin of Adam in the Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Mundelein: Saint Mary of the Lake Seminary, 1950.Google Scholar
Frediksen, Paula. Sin: The Early History of an Idea. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gagnebet, M.-Rosaire. “L’amour naturel de Dieu chez saint Thomas et ses contemporains (II).” Revue Thomiste 49 (1949): 31–102.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. De Deo Trino et Creatore: Commentarius in Summam Theologicam S. Thomae (Ia q. xxvii–cxix). Taurini: Marietti and Descleé de Brouwer, 1943.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. “La mortification et les suites du péché original.” La vie spirituelle 12 (1925): 17–31.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. “Utrum gratia sanctificans fuerit in Adamo dos naturae an donum personae tantum.” Angelicum 2 (1925): 133–44.Google Scholar
Gaudel, A. “Péché originel.” In Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique 12 (1933): 275–606.Google Scholar
Gaventa, Beverly Roberts. Our Mother Saint Paul. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Gavrilyuk, Paul L. “The Retrieval of Deification: How a Once-Despised Archaism Became an Ecumenical Desideratum.” Modern Theology 25.4 (2009): 647–59.Google Scholar
George, Marie I. “Aquinas on Intelligent Extra-Terrestrial Life.” The Thomist 65 (2001): 239–58.Google Scholar
Gerrish, B. A. “Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst.” In The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought, ed. Hastings, Adrian, Mason, Alistair, and Pyper, Hugh, 644–6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Givens, Terryl L. When Souls Had Wings: Pre-mortal Existence in Western Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Goethes Briefe, 4 vols. Hamburg: Christian Wegner Verlag, 1964.Google Scholar
Gombis, Timothy G. “Paul.” In the T&T Clark Companion to the Doctrine of Sin, ed. Johnson, Keith L. and Lauber, David, 97–110. New York: T&T Clark, 2016.Google Scholar
Green, Richard E., et al. “A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome.” Science 328.5979 (2010): 710–22.Google Scholar
Grimm, Stephen R. “Kant’s Argument for Radical Evil.” European Journal of Philosophy 10.2 (2002): 160–77.Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain. “The True Ultimate End of Human Beings: The Kingdom, Not God Alone.” Theological Studies 69 (2008): 38–61.Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain. The Way of the Lord Jesus, vol. 1: Christian Moral Principles. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Gross, Julius. Geschichte des Erbsündendogmas: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Problems vom Ursprung des Übels. 4 vols. München: Ernst Reinhardt, 1960–72.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter, ed. The Harmony of the Protestant Confessions: Exhibiting the Faith of the Churches of Christ, Reformed after the Pure and Holy Doctrine of the Gospel, throughout Europe. London: John F. Shaw, 1842.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Tess of the d’Urbervilles: A Pure Woman. London: Folio Society, 1991.Google Scholar
Hare, John. The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits and God’s Assistance. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.Google Scholar
Haught, John F. God after Darwin: A Theology of Evolution, 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Helm, Paul. Calvin at the Centre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Henrici, Peter. “The Philosophers and Original Sin.” Communio 18 (1991): 489–501.Google Scholar
Hervé, J. M. Manuale theologiae dogmaticae. Vol 2. Paris: Berche et Pagis, 1935.Google Scholar
Hick, John. Evil and the God of Love. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Hiestand, Gerald. “A More Modest Adam: An Exploration of Irenaeus’ Anthropology in Light of the Darwinian Account of Pre-Fall Death.” Bulletin of Ecclesial Theology 5.1 (2018): 55–72.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Joshua P. The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan’s De Nominum Analogia. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Holte, Ragnar. Béatitude et sagesse: Saint Augustin et le problème de la fin de l’homme dans la philosophie ancienne. Paris: Études augustiniennes, 1962.Google Scholar
Houck, Daniel W. “Natura Humana Relicta est Christo: Thomas Aquinas on the Effects of Original Sin.” Archa Verbi 13 (2016): 68–102.Google Scholar
Houck, Daniel W. “Original Sin in Abelard’s Commentary on Romans.” In Being Saved: Explorations in Soteriology and Human Ontology, ed. Cortez, Marc, Farris, Joshua, and Mark Hamilton, S., 54–67. London: SCM Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hudson, Hud. The Fall and Hypertime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hütter, Reinhard. “Desiderium Naturale Visionis Dei – Est autem duplex hominis beatitudo sive felicitas: Some Observations about Lawrence Feingold’s and John Milbank’s Recent Interventions in the Debate over the Natural Desire to See God.” Nova et Vetera, English edition, 5.1 (2007): 81–132.Google Scholar
Janz, Denis R. Luther and Late Medieval Thomism. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Jewett, Robert. Romans: A Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2007.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark F. “Augustine and Aquinas on Original Sin: Doctrine, Authority, and Pedagogy.” In Aquinas the Augustinian, ed. Dauphinais, M., David, B., and Levering, M., 145–58. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark F. “St Thomas and the ‘Law of Sin.’” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévale 67 (2000): 80–95.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Religion. In Religion and Rational Theology, ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone. Trans. Green, Theodore M. and Hudson, Hoyt H.. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960.Google Scholar
Kaup, Julian. “Die Begründung des Schuldcharakters der Erbsünde bei Thomas von Aquin und ihre Kritik durch Johannes Peckham und Petrus Johannis Olivi.” In Wahrheit und Verkündigung: Michael Schmaus zum 70. Geburtstag, vol. 1, ed. Scheffczyk, L., Dettloff, W., and Heinzmann, Richard, 851–76. München: Schöningh, 1967.Google Scholar
Kemp, Kenneth W. “Science, Theology, and Monogenesis.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2011): 217–36.Google Scholar
Kidner, Derek. Genesis: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2008 [1967].Google Scholar
Kleffman, Tom. Die Erbsündenlehre in sprachtheologischem Horizont: Eine Interpretation Augustins, Luthers und Hamanns. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1994.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “The Medieval Problem of Universals.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/universals-medieval/, accessed January 10, 2016.Google Scholar
Kors, J. B. La Justice primitive et le péché originel d’après S. Thomas. Paris: Bibliothèque Thomiste, 1922.Google Scholar
Korsmeyer, Jerry D. Evolution and Eden: Balancing Original Sin and Contemporary Science. New York: Paulist Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Köster, Henrich M. Urstand, Fall und Erbsünde in der Scholastik. Freiburg: Herder, 1979.Google Scholar
Labourdette, M. M. Le Péché originel et les origines de l’homme. Paris: Alsatia, 1953.Google Scholar
Laland, Kevin, Wray, Gregory, Hoekstra, Hopi, et al. “Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink?” Nature 514 (2014): 161–4.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, Denis O. “Beyond Original Sin: Is a Theological Paradigm Shift Inevitable?” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 67.1 (2015): 35–49.Google Scholar
Lawler, M. G. “Grace and Free Will in Justification.” The Thomist 35 (1971): 601–30.Google Scholar
Levering, Matthew. Engaging the Doctrine of Creation: Cosmos, Creatures, and the Wise and Good Creator. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2017.Google Scholar
Livingstone, David. Adam’s Ancestors: Race, Religion, and the Politics of Human Origins. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lockett, Leslie. Anglo-Saxon Psychologies in the Vernacular and Latin Traditions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Nicholas. The Logic of Desire: Aquinas on Emotion. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lonergan, Bernard. Grace and Freedom: Operative Grace in the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Long, Steven A. Natura Pura: On the Recovery of Nature in the Doctrine of Grace. New York: Fordham University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lottin, D. Odon. “Le péché originel chez Albert le Grand, Bonaventure et Thomas d’Aquin.” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 12 (1940): 275–328.Google Scholar
Lottin, D. Odon. Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles, Tom. IV: Problèmes de morale, troisième partie. Louvain, 1954.Google Scholar
Lyonnet, S. “Le Péché Originel et l’exégèse de Rom. 5, 12–14.” Recherches de science religieuse 44 (1956): 63–84.Google Scholar
Madueme, Hans. “‘The Most Vulnerable Part of the Whole Christian Account’: Original Sin and Modern Science.” In Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin: Theological, Biblical, and Scientific Perspectives, ed. Madueme, Hans and Reeves, Michael, 225–49. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Magrath, Oswin. “St. Thomas’s Theory of Original Sin.” The Thomist 16.2 (1953): 161–89.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Jack. Christianity in Evolution: An Exploration. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mansini, Guy. “Lonergan on the Natural Desire in the Light of Feingold.” Nova et Vetera, English edition, 5.1 (2007): 185–98.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. The Philosophy of Peter Abelard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Aquinas as Postliberal Theologian.” The Thomist 53.3 (1989): 353–402.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Beatus vir: Aquinas, Romans 4, and the Role of ‘Reckoning’ in Justification.” In Reading Romans with Saint Thomas Aquinas, ed. Levering, Matthew and Dauphinais, Michael, 216–38. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Christ the End of Analogy.” In The Analogy of Being: Invention of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God?, ed. White, Thomas Joseph, 280–313. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Debt, Punishment, and Payment: A Meditation on the Cross, in Light of St. Anselm.” Nova et Vetera, English edition, 9.1 (2011): 163–81.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Ex Occidente Lux? Aquinas and Eastern Orthodox Theology.” Modern Theology 20.1 (2004): 23–50.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Faith and Reason Reconsidered: Aquinas and Luther on Deciding What Is True.” The Thomist 63.1 (1999): 1–48.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Justification as Declaration and Deification.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 4.1 (2002): 3–28.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Look on the Faith of Your Church: Mary’s Assent and the Task of Theology.” Nova et Vetera, English edition, 13.2 (2015): 419–39.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Quod Scit Una Uetula: Aquinas on the Nature of Theology.” In The Theology of Thomas Aquinas, ed. Wawrykow, Joseph and Van Nieuwenhove, Rik, 1–35. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. “Religion and Election: Aquinas on Natural Law, Judaism, and Salvation in Christ.” Nova et Vetera, English edition, 14.1 (2016): 61–125.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce D. Trinity and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Martin, R. M. “La doctrina sobre el pecado original en la Summa contra Gentiles.” La Ciencia Tomista 10 (1915): 389–400.Google Scholar
Martin, R. M. “La question du péché originel dans Saint Anselme.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 5 (1911): 735–48.Google Scholar
Mausbach, Joseph. Die Ethik des Heilegen Augustinus. Vol 2. Freiburg: Herdersche Verlagshandlung, 1909.Google Scholar
McCabe, Hebert. God Still Matters. London: Continuum, 2005 [2002].Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. “Karl Barth’s Version of an ‘Analogy of Being’: A Dialectical No and Yes to Roman Catholicism.” In The Analogy of Being: Invention of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God?, ed. White, Thomas Joseph, 88–144. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
McDermott, Timothy. “Original Sin, I & II.” New Blackfriars 49 January–February (1968).Google Scholar
McFadyen, Alistair. Bound to Sin: Abuse, Holocaust and the Christian Doctrine of Sin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
McFarland, Ian A. In Adam’s Fall: A Meditation on the Christian Doctrine of Original Sin. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
McFarland, Ian A. “Original Sin.” In T&T Clark Companion to the Doctrine of Sin, ed. Johnson, Keith L. and Lauber, David, 303–18. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016.Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister E. Reformation Thought: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar
Merlin, Nicolas. Saint Augustin et les dogmes de péché originel et de la grâce. Paris: Librairie Letouzey, 1931.Google Scholar
Mews, Constant J. Abelard and Heloise. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Meyer, Matthias, et al. “A High-Coverage Genome Sequence from an Archaic Denisovan Individual,” Science 338 (2012): 222–6.Google Scholar
Meyer, Nicholas A. Adam’s Dust and Adam’s Glory in the Hodayot and the Letters of Paul: Rethinking Anthropogony and Theology. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Milbank, John. The Suspended Middle: Henri de Lubac and the Renewed Split in Modern Catholic Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Miles, Rebekah. “Valerie Saiving Reconsidered.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 28.1 (Spring 2012): 79–86.Google Scholar
Miller, Eddis N. Kant’s “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Mohler, Albert R. Jr. “The New Shape of the Debate.” Southern Seminary Magazine (Winter 2011): 22–6.Google Scholar
Mulchahey, M. Michèle. “First the Bow Is Bent in Study …”: Dominican Education before 1350. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1998.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. Philosophical Myths of the Fall. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Nisula, Timo. Augustine and the Functions of Concupiscence. Boston: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Noll, Mark. “Charles Hodge.” In Reading Romans through the Centuries: From the Early Church to Karl Barth, ed. Greenman, Jeffrey and Larsen, Timothy, 169–86. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2005.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin A., and Coakley, Sarah, eds. Evolution, Games, and God. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
O’Brien, T. C. “Fallen Nature.” In appendix 9 to vol. 26 of the Summa theologiae Ia2æ, ed. O’Brien, T. C., 154–61. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, Oliver. The Problem of Self-Love in Augustine. London: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Oliva, Adriano. “La contemplation des philosophes selon Thomas d’Aquin.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 96 (2012): 585–662.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Thomas. Thomas Aquinas, Theologian. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Osborne, Thomas M. Love of Self and Love of God in Thirteenth-Century Ethics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Otto, S. A. “‘Felix Culpa.’ The Doctrine of Original Sin as Doctrine of Hope in Aquinas’s Summa contra Gentiles.” The Heythrop Journal 50 (2009): 781–92.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. Comprehensive Commentary on Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016.Google Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence R. Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Pelagius, . Commentary on St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Trans. de Bruyn, Theodore. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Pesch, Otto Hermann. Theologie der Rechtfertigung bei Martin Luther und Thomas von Aquin: Versuch eines systematisch-theologischen Dialogs. Mainz: M. Grünewald, 1967.Google Scholar
Pesch, Otto Hermann. “Der Urstand des Menschen. Eine Erkundung bei Thomas von Aquin.” Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift 63 (2012): 134–44.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gregory. “Falling Up: Evolution and Original Sin.” In Evolution and Ethics: Human Morality in Biological and Religious Perspective, ed. Clayton, Phillip and Schloss, Jeffrey, 273–86. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Portalié, Eugêne. A Guide to the Thought of Saint Augustine. Trans. Bastian, Ralph J.. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1960.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. “Concerning the Relationship between Nature and Grace,” in Theological Investigations, vol. 1. Trans. Ernst, Cornelius, 297–317. Baltimore: Helicon, 1961.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. “Evolution and Original Sin.” In Concilium 26, trans. Metz, Johannes, 61–73. New York: Paulist Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. “Original Sin.” In Sacramentum Mundi: An Encyclopedia of Theology, vol. 4, ed. Rahner, Karl et al., 328–34. London: Burns and Oates, 1969.Google Scholar
Ramírez, Jacobus. De vitiis et peccatis, In I-II Summae theologiae Divi Thomae expositio. Salamanca: San Esteban, 1990.Google Scholar
Rea, Michael C. “The Metaphysics of Original Sin.” In Persons: Human and Divine, ed. van Inwagen, Peter and Zimmerman, Dean, 319–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Redding, John P. The Influence of St. Augustine on the Doctrine of the II Council of Orange Concerning Original Sin. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Reich, David. Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past. New York: Pantheon Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Relethford, John H. “Genetics of Modern Human Origins and Diversity.” Annual Review of Anthropology 27 (1998): 1–23.Google Scholar
Resnick, Irven M. “Introduction: Odo of Tournai.” In On Original Sin and a Disputation with the Jew, Leo, Concerning the Advent of Christ, the Son of God. Trans. Resnick, Irven M.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Philip Lyndon. Food & the Body: Some Peculiar Questions in High Medieval Theology. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Rigby, Paul. “Original Sin.” In Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia, ed. Fitzgerald, A., 607–14. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999.Google Scholar
Rigby, Paul. Original Sin in Augustine’s Confessions. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Rist, John M. Augustine Deformed: Love, Sin and Freedom in the Western Moral Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Rondet, Henri. Le Péché originel dans la tradition patristique et théologique. Paris: Librairie Fayard, 1967.Google Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W. Peter Lombard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Rosen-Zivi, Ishay. Demonic Desires: Yetzer Hara and the Problem of Evil in Late Antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Stanley P., Burdett, Michael, Lloyd, Michael, and van den Toren, Benno, eds. Finding Ourselves after Darwin. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2018.Google Scholar
Sage, Athanase. “Le péché originel dans la pensée de saint Augustin, de 412 à 430.” Revue des études augustiniennes 13 (1969): 211–48.Google Scholar
Saiving, Valerie. “The Human Situation: A Feminine View.” In Womanspirit Rising: A Feminist Reader in Religion, ed. Christ, Carol P. and Plaskow, Judith, 25–42. New York: HarperCollins, 1992.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. P. Paul and Palestinian Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Savage, Minot Judson. The Religion of Evolution. Boston: Lockwood, Brooks, 1881.Google Scholar
Schenk, Richard. “Analogy as the discrimen naturae et gratiae: Thomism and Ecumenical Learning.” In The Analogy of Being: Invention of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God?, ed. White, Thomas Joseph, 172–91. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. The Christian Faith. Trans. Mackintosh, H. R. and Stewart, James S.. Berkeley: Apocryphile, 2011.Google Scholar
Schönborn, Christoph. “Die kirchliche Erbsündenlehre im Umriss.” In Zur kirchlichen Erbsündenlehre. Stellungnahmen zu einer brennenden Frage, ed. Schönborn, Christoph, 69–102. Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar
Schoonenberg, Piet. Der Macht der Zonde. L.C.G. Malmberg: Hertogenbosch, 1962.Google Scholar
Schoonenberg, Piet. Man and Sin: A Theological View. Trans. Donceel, J.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Schubert, Anselm. Das Ende der Sünde: Anthropologie und Erbsünde zwischen Reformation und Aufklärung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2002.Google Scholar
Shanley, Brian. “Aquinas on Pagan Virtue.” The Thomist 63 (1999): 553–77.Google Scholar
Sharkey, Sarah Borden. “How Can Being Be Limited?: W. Norris Clarke on Thomas’s ‘Limitation of Act by Potency.’” The Saint Anselm Journal 7.1 (2009): 1–19.Google Scholar
Siewerth, Gustav. Die christliche Erbsündelehre: Entwickelt auf Grund der Theologie des Heiligen Thomas von Aquin. Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag, 1964.Google Scholar
Smith, James K. A. “Lost in Translation? On the Secularization of the Fall.” In The Devil Reads Derrida: And Other Essays on the University, Church, Politics, and the Arts, 62–7. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Southern, R. W. Saint Anselm: A Portrait in a Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. The Groaning of Creation: God, Evolution, and the Problem of Evil. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2008.Google Scholar
Staffner, Hans. “Die Lehre des hl. Augustinus über das Wesen der Erbsünde.” Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie 79 (1957): 385–416.Google Scholar
Stringer, Chris. “Why We Are Not All Multiregionalists Now.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29.5 (2014): 248–51.Google Scholar
Suchoki, Marjorie Hewitt. The Fall to Violence: Original Sin in Relational Theology. New York: Continuum, 1994.Google Scholar
Swafford, Andrew Dean. Nature and Grace: A New Approach to Thomistic Ressourcement. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014.Google Scholar
Swamidass, Joshua S. “The Overlooked Science of Genealogical Ancestry.” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 70.1 (2018): 9–35.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. Responsibility and Atonement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Te Velde, Rudi. “Evil, Sin, and Death: Thomas Aquinas on Original Sin.” In The Theology of Thomas Aquinas, ed. van Nieuwenhove, R. and Wawrykow, J., 143–66. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Tennant, F. R. The Concept of Sin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1912.Google Scholar
Tennant, F. R. The Origin and Propagation of Sin, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1906.Google Scholar
Tennant, F. R. The Sources of the Doctrine of the Fall and Original Sin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Initiation à saint Thomas d’Aquin: Sa personne et son oeuvre. Fribourg: Les Éditions du Cerf, 2002.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. “Nature et grâce chez Thomas d’Aquin.” Revue Thomiste 101 (2001): 167–202.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 1: The Person and His Work. Trans. Royal, Robert. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Trooster, S. G. M. Evolution and the Doctrine of Original Sin. Trans. Ter Haar, John A.. Glen Rock: Newman Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Tschipke, Theophil. L’humanité du Christ comme instrument de salut de la divinité. Fribourg: Academic Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Van den Toren, Benno. “Human Evolution and a Cultural Evolution of Original Sin.” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 68.1 (2016): 12–21.Google Scholar
Van Oort, Johannes. “Jews and Judaism in Augustine’s Sermones.” Instrvmenta Patristica et Mediaevalia 53 (2009): 213–65.Google Scholar
Van Roo, William A. Grace and Original Justice According to St. Thomas. Rome: Gregorian University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Vandervelde, George. Original Sin: Two Major Trends in Contemporary Catholic Reinterpretation. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1981.Google Scholar
Vanneste, A. Het dogma van de erfzonde: Zinloze mythe of openbaring van een grondstruktuur van het menselijk bestaan? Tielt: Lannoo, 1969.Google Scholar
Vanneste, A. Le dogme du péché originel. Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1971.Google Scholar
Venema, Denis R., and McKnight, Scot. Adam and the Genome: Reading Scripture after Genetic Science. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Verriele, A. Le Surnaturel en nous et le péché originel. Paris: Bloud et Gay, 1932.Google Scholar
Vollert, Cyril. The Doctrine of Hervaeus Natalis on Primitive Justice and Original Sin: As Developed in the Controversy on Original Sin during the Early Decades 14th Century. Rome: Gregorian University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Vollert, Cyril. “Saint Thomas on Sanctifying Grace and Original Justice: A Comparative Study of a Recent Controversy.” Theological Studies 2 (1941): 369–87.Google Scholar
Walsh, Liam G. “Thomas Aquinas, the Doctrine of Original Sin, and the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception.” In Studying Mary: Reflections on the Virgin Mary in Anglican and Roman Catholic Theology and Devotion, ed. Denaux, Adelbert and Sagovsky, Nicholas, 110–30. London: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar
Walton, John H. The Lost World of Adam and Eve: Genesis 2–3 and the Human Origins Debate. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Wawrykow, Joseph. God’s Grace and Human Action: “Merit” in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Weberburger, Richard. “‘Limbus Puerorum.’ Zur Enstehung eines theologischen Begriffes.” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 55 (1968): 83–133.Google Scholar
Webster, John. “‘The Firmest Grasp of the Real’: Barth on Original Sin.” Toronto Journal of Theology 4.1 (1988): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, Richard E. The Logic of Divine Love: A Critical Analysis of the Soteriology of Peter Abailard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Weir, D. A. The Origins of the Federal Theology in Sixteenth-Century Reformation Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Free Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Wiley, Tatha. Original Sin: Origins, Developments, Contemporary Meanings. New York: Paulist Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Williams, A. N. The Ground of Union: Deification in Aquinas and Palamas. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Williams, N. P. The Ideas of the Fall and of Original Sin: A Historical and Critical Study. London: Longman, Green, 1927.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia A. Doing without Adam and Eve: Sociobiology and Original Sin. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Willows, Adam M. “Natural Love: Aquinas, Evolution and Charity.” The Heythrop Journal (June 2017): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12665.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Nicolas Patrick. Twelve Lectures on the Connexion between Science and Revealed Religion. London: Cox and Wyman, 1849.Google Scholar
Wolpoff, Milford H., Hawks, John, and Casparai, Rachel. “Multiregional, Not Multiple Origins.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 112 (2000): 129–36.Google Scholar
Wolter, Allan B. “Duns Scotus on the Natural Desire for the Supernatural.” In The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus, ed. Adams, Marilyn McCord, 125–47. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. Kant’s Ethical Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Wrangham, Richard, and Peterson, Dale. Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1996.Google Scholar
Yarnold, Edward. The Theology of Original Sin. Hales Corner: Clergy Book Service, 1971.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Daniel W. Houck
  • Book: Aquinas, Original Sin, and the Challenge of Evolution
  • Online publication: 22 February 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108642927.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Daniel W. Houck
  • Book: Aquinas, Original Sin, and the Challenge of Evolution
  • Online publication: 22 February 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108642927.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Daniel W. Houck
  • Book: Aquinas, Original Sin, and the Challenge of Evolution
  • Online publication: 22 February 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108642927.011
Available formats
×