We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2009
In surveying past treatments of apposition, I demonstrate in this chapter that they provide either an inadequate or incomplete definition of apposition, and argue that apposition is best defined as a grammatical relation realized by constructions having specific syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic characteristics (1.1). To study these linguistic characteristics of apposition, I analyzed the appositions in three computer corpora of spoken and written English (1.2) with the aid of a problem-oriented tagging program (1.3).
The inadequacy of past studies of apposition
A survey of the literature on apposition supports Quirk et al.'s (1985:1302) assertion that “Grammarians vary in the freedom with which they apply the term ‘apposition’…”
Some sources take a very conservative approach to defining apposition. Both Fries (1952:187) and Francis (1958:301) restrict the category of apposition to coreferential noun phrases that are juxtaposed:
(1) The President of the United States, George Bush, spoke at a campaign breakfast yesterday.
Others have expanded the category of apposition considerably. Curme (1931) admits as appositions a diverse group of constructions, including predicate appositives (p. 30):
(2) He came home sick, [italics in original]
appositive genitives (p. 84):
(3) the vice of intemperance
apposition proper (pp. 88–91), which can be loose (example 4) or close (example 5), categorizations that correspond in this study to, respectively, nonrestrictive and restrictive apposition (see 3.3):
(4) Mary, the belle of the village
(5) my friend Jones
Apposition as a grammatical relation
and appositive adjectives (p. 93):
(6) the room above
Jespersen (1961), like Curme, quite liberally defines apposition.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
