Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Figures
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: The historical interpretation of mathematical texts and the problem of anachronism
- 2 From reading rules to reading algorithms: textual anachronisms in the history of mathematics and their effects on interpretation
- 3 Anachronism and anachorism in the study of mathematics in India
- 4 On the need to re-examine the relationship between the mathematical sciences and philosophy in Greek antiquity
- 5 Productive anachronism: on mathematical reconstruction as a historiographical method
- 6 Anachronism in the Renaissance historiography of mathematics
- 7 Deceptive familiarity: differential equations in Leibniz and the Leibnizian school (1689–1736)
- 8 Euler and analysis: case studies and historiographical perspectives
- 9 Measuring past geometers: a history of non-metric projective anachronism
- 10 Anachronism: Bonola and non-Euclidean geometry
- 11 Anachronism and incommensurability:words, concepts, contexts, and intentions
- Index
9 - Measuring past geometers: a history of non-metric projective anachronism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2021
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Figures
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: The historical interpretation of mathematical texts and the problem of anachronism
- 2 From reading rules to reading algorithms: textual anachronisms in the history of mathematics and their effects on interpretation
- 3 Anachronism and anachorism in the study of mathematics in India
- 4 On the need to re-examine the relationship between the mathematical sciences and philosophy in Greek antiquity
- 5 Productive anachronism: on mathematical reconstruction as a historiographical method
- 6 Anachronism in the Renaissance historiography of mathematics
- 7 Deceptive familiarity: differential equations in Leibniz and the Leibnizian school (1689–1736)
- 8 Euler and analysis: case studies and historiographical perspectives
- 9 Measuring past geometers: a history of non-metric projective anachronism
- 10 Anachronism: Bonola and non-Euclidean geometry
- 11 Anachronism and incommensurability:words, concepts, contexts, and intentions
- Index
Summary
A recurring historical narrative depicts Jean-Victor Poncelet, Michel Chasles, Jakob Steiner, and other early-nineteenth-century geometers as striving and failing to create a non-metric projective geometry. According to this historiographical view, only in the middle of the century with Karl Christian Georg von Staudt would projective geometry be liberated from its ties to measurement. This claim for geometers before von Staudt is what I will call the non-metric projective anachronism. This chapter will consider how and why pure geometers of the early nineteenth century came to be seen as opposed to measurement. A focus on Klein will capture features of late-nineteenth-century mathematics that made the non-metric projective anachronism so appealing.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anachronisms in the History of MathematicsEssays on the Historical Interpretation of Mathematical Texts, pp. 251 - 280Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021