Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:49:48.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Eshelby approach to modelling composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

T. W. Clyne
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
P. J. Withers
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

In the previous chapter a number of models were presented for estimating the partitioning of loads between the constituents of composites subjected to external loads. These models involve mathematical approximations ranging from the good to the very poor. Some are rather limited in terms of the properties which can be predicted, while others are computationally daunting. For an isolated inclusion (reinforcing constituent) having an ellipsoidal shape, the approach presented in this chapter is mathematically rigorous. Later we shall see that it is also a good model at higher inclusion volume fractions and for other inclusion shapes. This analysis, commonly named the Eshelby method, turns out to be useful for predicting a wide range of composite properties. On a practical level, the standard equations highlighted by boxes in the text can be used to predict many composite properties quickly and fairly accurately.

Internal stresses are commonplace in almost any material which is mechanically inhomogeneous. Typically, their magnitude varies according to the degree of inhomogeneity: for an externally loaded polycrystalline cubic metal, differently oriented crystallites will be stressed to different extents, but these differences are usually quite small. For a composite, consisting of two distinct constituents with different stiffnesses, these disparities in stress will commonly be much larger. Internal stresses arise as a result of some kind of misfit between the shapes of the constituents (matrix and reinforcement, i.e. fibre, whisker or particle). Such a misfit could arise from a temperature change, but a closely related situation is created during mechanical loading - when a stiff inclusion tends to deform less than the surrounding matrix.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×